Who is online?
In total there are 13 users online :: 0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 13 Guests :: 1 Bot

None

[ View the whole list ]


Most users ever online was 111 on Thu 12 Dec 2013, 2:28 am
Latest topics
» Live Long and Prosper: The Jewish Story Behind Spock,
Yesterday at 9:58 pm by Admin

» What Is the Hajj? Everything You Need to Know About Islam's Holy Pilgrimage
Yesterday at 9:44 pm by Admin

» ISRAEL BREAKING NEWS
Yesterday at 9:35 pm by Admin

» Delrifkah: HEBREW SAGE MIGHT SAY.
Yesterday at 9:29 pm by Admin

» Bayo Afolaranmi (Pastor).
Yesterday at 9:21 pm by Admin

» NUGGET Today's Devotional
Yesterday at 9:17 pm by Admin

»  Chip Brogden CHURCH WITHOUT WALLS
Yesterday at 9:10 pm by Admin

» ISRAEL VIDEO'S
Yesterday at 8:54 pm by Admin

»  HONEST REPORTING Defending Israel from Media Bias plz read REGULAR UPDATES
Yesterday at 8:31 pm by Admin

» Syria-Iran-Israel-Russia-Turkey
Yesterday at 7:17 pm by Admin

» PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP
Yesterday at 6:51 pm by Admin

» WORLD ISRAEL NEWS
Yesterday at 11:34 am by Admin

» How Arafat and the KGB invented a nationality to change the debate over Israel
Yesterday at 11:03 am by Admin

» JIHAD WATCH
Yesterday at 10:06 am by Admin

» ENDTIME HEADLINES
Yesterday at 9:09 am by Admin

» BIRTH PANGS – Series of Powerful Earthquakes Volcano's Strike Around the Globe
Yesterday at 8:54 am by Admin

» UN chief suggests armed forces in Gaza to protect Palestinians
Yesterday at 8:47 am by Admin

» Daily Disciples
Yesterday at 8:27 am by Admin

» HEAVEN LETTERS
Yesterday at 8:25 am by Admin

» FRANCIS FRANGIPANE MINISTRIES
Sat 18 Aug 2018, 8:53 pm by Admin

Navigation
 Portal
 Index
 Memberlist
 Profile
 FAQ
 Search

Obama not going away

Page 1 of 2 1, 2  Next

Go down

Re: Obama not going away

Post  Admin on Fri 17 Aug 2018, 2:04 pm

The Comical Conservative
July 26, 2013 · 
President Obama walks into a local bank in Chicago to cash a check. He is surrounded by Secret Service agents. As he approaches the cashier he says, "Good morning Ma'am, could you please cash this check for me?"

Cashier:
"It would be my pleasure sir. Could you please show me your ID?"

Obama:
"Truthfully, I did not bring my ID with me as I didn't think there was any need to. I am President Barack Obama, the President of the United States of AMERICA !!!!"

Cashier:
"Yes sir, I know who you are, but with all the regulations and monitoring of the banks because of 9/11, impostors, forgers, money laundering, and bad mortgage underwriting not to mention requirements of the Dodd/Frank legislation, etc., I must insist on seeing ID."

Obama:
“Just ask anyone here at the bank who I am and they will tell you. Everybody knows who I am."

Cashier:
"I am sorry Mr. President but these are the bank rules and I must follow them."

Obama:
"I am urging you, please, to cash this check. I need to buy a gift for Michelle for Valentine’s Day"

Cashier:
"Look Mr. President, here is an example of what we can do. One day, Tiger Woods came into one of our bank branches without ID. To prove he was Tiger Woods he pulled out his putter and made a beautiful shot across the bank into a coffee cup. With that shot we knew him to be Tiger Woods and cashed his check.”
“Another time, Andre Agassi came into the same place without ID. He pulled out his tennis racquet and made a fabulous shot where as the tennis ball landed in a coffee cup. With that shot we cashed his check.
So, Mr. President, what can you do to prove that it is you, and only you, as the President of the United States?"

Obama:
Obama stands there thinking, and thinking, and finally says, "Honestly, my mind is a total blank...there is nothing that comes to my mind. I can't think of a single thing. I have absolutely no idea what to do and I don’t have a clue.”
Cashier:
"Will that be large or small bills, Mr. President?
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 53241
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: Obama not going away

Post  Admin on Wed 15 Aug 2018, 9:09 pm

Thomas W. Ahlf is with Lana Henderson.
July 21, 2015 at 4:17 PM
Quit trashing Obama's accomplishments. He has done more than any other President before him. Here is a list of his impressive accomplishments:

1. First President to be photographed smoking a joint. 
2. First President to apply for college aid as a foreign student, then deny he was a foreigner. 
3. First President to have a social security number from a state he has never lived in. 
4. First President to preside over a cut to the credit-rating of the United States. 
5. First President to violate the War Powers Act. 
6. First President to be held in contempt of court for illegally obstructing oil drilling in the Gulf of Mexico. 
7. First President to require all Americans to purchase a product from a third party. 
8. First President to spend a trillion dollars on "shovel-ready" jobs when there was no such thing as "shovel-ready" jobs. 
9. First President to abrogate bankruptcy law to turn over control of companies to his union supporters. 
10. First President to by-pass Congress and implement the Dream Act through executive fiat. 
11. First President to order a secret amnesty program that stopped the deportation of illegal immigrants across the U.S., including those with criminal convictions. 
12. First President to demand a company hand-over $20 billion to one of his political appointees. 
13. First President to tell a CEO of a major corporation (Chrysler) to resign. 
14. First President to terminate America’s ability to put a man in space. 
15. First President to cancel the National Day of Prayer and to say that America is no longer a Christian nation. 
16. First President to have a law signed by an auto-pen without being present. 
17. First President to arbitrarily declare an existing law unconstitutional and refuse to enforce it. 
18. First President to threaten insurance companies if they publicly spoke out on the reasons for their rate increases. 
19. First President to tell a major manufacturing company in which state it is allowed to locate a factory. 
20. First President to file lawsuits against the states he swore an oath to protect (AZ, WI, OH, IN). 
21. First President to withdraw an existing coal permit that had been properly issued years ago. 
22. First President to actively try to bankrupt an American industry (coal). 
23. First President to fire an inspector general of AmeriCorps for catching one of his friends in a corruption case. 
24. First President to appoint 45 czars to replace elected officials in his office. 
25. First President to surround himself with radical left wing anarchists. 
26. First President to golf more than 150 separate times in his five years in office. 
27. First President to hide his birth, medical, educational and travel records. 
28. First President to win a Nobel Peace Prize for doing NOTHING to earn it. 
29. First President to go on multiple "global apology tours" and concurrent "insult our friends" tours. 
30. First President to go on over 17 lavish vacations, in addition to date nights and Wednesday evening White House parties for his friends paid for by the taxpayers. 
31. First President to have personal servants (taxpayer funded) for his wife. 
32. First President to keep a dog trainer on retainer for $102,000 a year at taxpayer expense. 
33. First President to fly in a personal trainer from Chicago at least once a week at taxpayer expense. 
34. First President to repeat the Quran and tell us the early morning call of the Azan (Islamic call to worship) is the most beautiful sound on earth. 
35. First President to side with a foreign nation over one of the American 50 states (Mexico vs Arizona). 
36. First President to tell the military men and women that they should pay for their own private insurance because they "volunteered to go to war and knew the consequences." 
37. Then he was the First President to tell the members of the military that THEY were UNPATRIOTIC for balking at the last suggestion.

I feel much better now. I had been under the impression he hadn't been doing ANYTHING... Such an accomplished individual... in the eyes of the ignorant maybe.!.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 53241
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: Obama not going away

Post  Admin on Wed 08 Aug 2018, 12:41 pm

https://www.patriotnewsalerts.com/obama-support-south-africa/?utm_source=dc&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=dc-1
Obama called him ‘inspiring.’ Now, the president of South Africa is pushing for farm seizures.
August 6, 2018 by Ben Marquis
Obama called him ‘inspiring.’ Now, the president of South Africa is pushing for farm seizures.
Image via Lacy Landre / CCL
Former President Barack Obama spoke in Johannesburg, South Africa, earlier this summer to celebrate the 100th anniversary of the birth of Nelson Mandela, the country’s most famous political icon. But instead of simply memorializing Mandela’s humanitarian work, Obama didn’t hesitate to praise South African President Cyril Ramaphosa for “inspiring new hope” in South Africa.

This praise comes after Ramaphosa declared in December that he would soon allow the “expropriation of land without compensation,” particularly from white farmers, apparently as retribution for South Africa’s apartheid era that ended nearly a quarter of a century ago. And now that the government is in the process of amending their constitution to formally legalize the expropriation process, Obama’s praise for the South African president is looking especially shameful.

Obama “inspired” by government-sponsored persecution?
Concern over Obama’s July comments first came from Tucker Carlson, who condemned the former president’s speech on his self-titled Fox News program shortly after Obama spoke in Johannesburg. “Ramaphosa recently declared that he would change the South African constitution,” Carlson said, “and he’ll do it for the explicit purpose of persecuting a racial minority, seizing their land without compensation, not because they committed any specific crime, but because they are the wrong color…purely on racial grounds.” Watch below:

Tucker Carlson Obama In South Africa Praises White Genocide Leaders
WATCH https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=33&v=ZzHg-IiDX4A
Obama had said on July 17 that Ramaphosa “is inspiring new hope in this great country” — but Carlson didn’t find Ramaphosa’s actions to be “inspiring.”

That opinion likely hasn’t changed, as the ruling party, the African National Congress, has now moved to “finalize the proposed amendment to the constitution that outlines more clearly the conditions under which expropriation of land without compensation can be effected,” Ramaphosa announced last week.

“It has become pertinently clear that our people want the constitution to be more explicit about expropriation of land without compensation as demonstrated in the public hearings,” the South African president explained.

Ramaphosa went on to explain that “the intention of this proposed amendment is to promote redress, advance economic development, [and] increase agricultural production and food security.”

White South Africans flee the country in fear
In reality, the amendment would do little more than provide cover for an explicitly racist policy that seeks to reverse the effects of the nation’s apartheid era — during which whites owned most of the nation’s land and blacks owned very little — by expropriating land from white landowners and redistributing it among black citizens.

As noted by RT, “There have been growing fears that the planned expropriation will deal a blow to commercial farming in the country and might put it on the verge of a food production crisis.”

Experts are concerned that the new farmers who take over the land expropriated by the government will have little experience in agriculture, an issue that could push the already-impoverished country into total starvation. Such a scenario occurred in neighboring Zimbabwe after the agricultural land was redistributed in 2000 — food production dropped as experienced farmers left.

Additionally, Ramaphosa’s land redistribution strategy has the country’s white population, which makes up about nine percent of the citizenry, concerned not just over the loss of land, but also about “what they say is a surge in violence and government-fueled hostility against them,” according to RT, who reported that some of the country’s whites have even sought asylum abroad.

“Thanks to policies like this,” Carlson said in July, “many South Africans have already been murdered in race killings and many more are fleeing the country for their lives.”

Do you oppose South Africa's racist expropriation of land from white farmers as a form of "redress"?
Yes
No
Next
The future of South Africa rests in racist hands
Meanwhile, Ramaphosa has maintained that he simply wants “dialog[ue], discussion, [and] engagement until we find good solutions that take our country forward.” He added in March that “there is no reason for anyone of us to panic and start beating war drums.”

But if there was ever a time to panic, it would be now. The South African government has prioritized explicitly racial policies over the wellbeing of its people in order to “promote redress” for racial policies of decades ago.

Even more horrifying: that sentiment is apparently “inspiring” former President Barack Obama. What a shame.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 53241
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: Obama not going away

Post  Admin on Sun 05 Aug 2018, 4:10 pm

Obama Endorses 81 Democrats for Midterm Elections; Snubs Socialist Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
3139
Former U.S. President Barack Obama, left, delivers his speech at the 16th Annual Nelson Mandela Lecture at the Wanderers Stadium in Johannesburg, South Africa, Tuesday, July 17, 2018. In his highest-profile speech since leaving office, Obama urged people around the world to respect human rights and other values under threat …AP Photo/Themba Hadebe
1 Aug 20183,484
President Barack Obama announced an endorsement list of 81 Democrats for the Congressional midterm elections and even some candidates for Governor and state-level races.
But he did not signal support for rising Socialist Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez who surprised the political establishment by defeating prominent Congressman Joe Crowley in New York.
Obama also did not weigh in on the New York race for Governor as Governor Andrew Cuomo faces a challenge from actress Cynthia Nixon. He also did not endorse Rep. Beto O’Rourke who is challenging Sen. Ted Cruz in Texas.
Establishment Senate Democrats seeking re-election were also snubbed by Obama, including Senators facing tough races such as Bill Nelson, Joe Manchin, Joe Donnelly, Jon Tester, and Claire McCaskill.
“I’m proud to endorse such a wide and impressive array of Democratic candidates – leaders as diverse, patriotic, and big-hearted as the America they’re running to represent,” Obama said in a statement sent to reporters.
The statement said that Obama’s list was a “first round” of Democratic candidates and that he was prioritizing control of the House of Representatives.
Obama plans to campaign in several states this fall and will release a second round of endorsements before the election.

Here is the full list:
MORE https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/08/01/obama-endorses-81-democrats-for-midterm-elections-snubs-socialist-alexandria-ocasio-cortez/?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_term=daily&utm_content=links&utm_campaign=20180801
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 53241
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: Obama not going away

Post  Admin on Wed 01 Aug 2018, 11:22 pm

WATCH: Obama administration knowingly gave US aid money to Al-Qaeda
July 26, 2018
A Middle East Forum investigation reveals that the Obama administration knowingly gave US aid money to an Al-Qaeda affiliate in Sudan that was sanctioned by the US for its support for terrorists, including Osama bin Laden and Hamas.
WATCH:EXCLUSIVE: Obama Administration Gave US Aid Money to Al Qaeda Affiliate in Sudan
Obama administration knowingly gave US aid money to Al-Qaeda
i24NEWS
Published on 25 Jul 2018
THE RUNDOWN | A joint i24NEWS- Middle East Forum investigation reveals that the Obama Administration knowingly gave US aid money to an Al-Qaeda affiliate in Sudan, sanctioned for its support for terrorists including Osama bin Laden and Hamas. Our Eylon Levy has the story.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=17&v=W1o2GlLywRs
July 26, 2018
A Middle East Forum investigation reveals that the Obama administration knowingly gave US aid money to an Al-Qaeda affiliate in Sudan that was sanctioned by the US for its support for terrorists, including Osama bin Laden and Hamas.

avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 53241
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: Obama not going away

Post  Admin on Thu 19 Jul 2018, 4:51 pm

VIDEO: Obama slams ‘right-wing billionaires,’ touts push for ‘universal income’
ShareTweet
BY ANNETA GRIFFEE / JULY 18, 2018 /
GET the DML NEWS APP (FREE) Click Here
As the most reliable and balanced news aggregation service on the internet, DML News offers the following information published by FOXNEWS.COM:
Former President Barack Obama, in a rare post-presidency speech abroad, took several thinly veiled shots at his successor and other populist “right-wing billionaires” — while openly touting a controversial liberal push for “universal income.”
In one of his biggest speeches since leaving the White House, Obama delivered the 2018 Nelson Mandela Annual Lecture in Johannesburg, South Africa on Tuesday. He used the platform to rail against populist movements, which have gained strength in the U.S. and Europe.
The article goes on to state the following:
Obama went on to slam the “right-wing billionaires” leading populist movements, in a clear reference to President Trump and like-minded politicians in Europe.
“Populist movements, cynically funded by right-wing billionaires worried about their own interests,” Obama said. “These movements tapped the unease that was felt by so many people who live outside of urban course. That their social status and privileges were eroding … threatened by outsiders, those who don’t look like them or sound like them.”
The report also stated:
Obama, meanwhile, on Tuesday seemed to embrace some talking points of the resurgent progressive left — including opening the door to proposals for a guaranteed income. One such proposal is being considered in Chicago.
MORE https://dmlnews.com/video-obama-slams-right-wing-billionaires-touts-push-universal-income/


https://politicsdailynewsreport.blogspot.com/2018/07/confirmed-barack-obama-was-running.html
CONFIRMED: Barack Obama was running the entire spygate operation that violated federal law to spy on Trump campaign officials
July 17, 2018
Image: CONFIRMED: Barack Obama was running the entire spygate operation that violated federal law to spy on Trump campaign officials
(Natural News) In recent months, democrats have laughed in the face of everyone that has even considered the possibility that Barack Obama was involved in the counterintelligence investigation into the Trump campaign. Now, it appears as though conservatives will have the last laugh after all.

After an in-depth analysis of text messages sent between FBI agent Peter Strzok and former FBI lawyer Lisa Page around the time the investigation into Trump’s campaign began, National Review’s Andrew McCarthy discovered that the Department of Justice had redacted bits of information that were damning for Barack Obama and his administration.

Damning evidence
One of the most revealing text messages that McCarthy highlighted came from Strzok, which appeared to indicate that, contrary to what liberals have been saying for months now, the Obama White House was involved in the entire anti-Trump operation. (Related: A deep state leak to the New York Times reveals that the Obama regime spied on the Trump campaign without evidence of any crime.)

The message, which related to a high-level meeting with CIA officials on August 5, 2016, read: “And hi. Went well, best we could have expected. Other than (REDACTED) quote: ‘the White House is running this.’ My answer, ‘well, maybe for you they are.’ And of course, I was planning on telling this guy, thanks for coming, we’ve got an hour, but with Bill (Priestap) there, I‘ve got no control.”

Bill Priestap was the assistant director of counterintelligence and Strzok’s immediate superior at the FBI.

In response to Strzok’s text message, Lisa Page replied: “Yeah, whatever (re the WH comment). We’ve got the emails that say otherwise.”
Based on this short conversation between Strzok and Page, it sure seems as though what conservatives have been saying for months now is true after all – that the Obama White House did, in fact, play a role in the counterintelligence investigation into the Trump campaign.

Still, though, there are two important questions that need to be answered: First, who was the redacted official who stated that the “White House is running this” regarding the investigation? And second, what is the content of the emails referenced by Lisa page “that say otherwise”?

In order to provide context to what already appears to be damning evidence against the Obama administration, these questions need to be answered sooner rather than later. (Related: Obama’s spying on the Trump campaign included the use of secret national security letters reserved for the most serious threats.)

One thing that we know for sure is that Obama’s spying on Trump’s team is turning out to be a much bigger and more significant scandal than the so-called “Russia collusion” narrative ever was. In fact, just this past weekend, Michael Barone of the New York Postmade the argument that Obama’s spying scandal has reached a point where it is now starting to resemble Watergate.


“The crime at the root of Watergate was an attempt at surveillance of the DNC after George McGovern seemed about to win the Democratic Party’s presidential nomination, just as the government misconduct in Russiagate was an attempt at surveillance of the Republican Party’s national campaign after Trump clinched its nomination,” Barone wrote.

Indeed, the Left’s behind-the-scenes efforts to tear down President Trump without any significant evidence of any wrongdoing whatsoever is quickly turning into one of the most serious scandals in recent history. Highly unethical and potentially illegal acts were seemingly committed, and now the liberals are desperately trying to cover their tracks through lies and the perpetuation of misinformation.

Sadly, however, it’s far from guaranteed that anybody will be held accountable. If history has taught us anything, it’s that liberals have a knack for avoiding legal consequences after committing crimes, even though they belong behind bars. Only time will tell if the United States justice system will prevail.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 53241
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: Obama not going away

Post  Admin on Mon 16 Jul 2018, 3:42 pm

James Woods Destroys Obama Legacy, Shows Americans the 1 Video Barack Wanted Us To Forget
BY JOE SAUNDERS 
JULY 15, 2018 AT 1:42PM
 Share on Facebook  Tweet  Email  Print
These are the words that haunt the Barack Obama legacy.

While Democrats and their media allies chase the phantom of “Russian collusion” with the Donald Trump campaign, leave it to conservative champion James Woods to pass on a Twitter post to remind Americans of just how brazenly Democrats downplayed the threat posed by Russia during the Obama administration.

As President Trump prepares to meet with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Helsinki, Finland, for the first summit between the two leaders, it’s a video that should make for some uncomfortable viewing for liberals with short memories.

The moment came during the final debate between then-President Obama and Republican challenger Mitt Romney at Lynne University in Boca Raton, Florida in October, 2012. (A full transcript is here, as published by the Commission on Presidential Debates.)

Romney had just gone through a litany of the dangers posed by terrorism in the Islamic world (terrorism that increased sharply under Obama’s feckless watch) when Obama launched his zinger that gladdened the hearts of his liberal fanbase — but now makes him look like a patronizing fool.

TRENDING: Woman Recording Strzok Testimony on Own TV Catches Creepiest Moment by Far

Woods passed on a video of the moment in a Saturday retweet, with the message: “This is like an ice cream Sundae.”

And here’s the video – just in case Democrats have forgotten it:


Caleb Hull

@CalebJHull
 Obama wouldn’t want this video to be shared.

You know what to do.  

9:38 PM - Jul 14, 2018
16.1K
13.5K people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy
“Governor Romney, I’m glad that you recognize that Al Qaida is a threat, because a few months ago when you were asked what’s the biggest geopolitical threat facing America, you said Russia, not Al Qaida,” Obama said. “You said Russia. And the 1980s, they’re now calling to ask for their foreign policy back because, you know, the Cold War’s been over for 20 years.”
Is American foreign policy better with Donald Trump as president?
Yes No
Completing this poll entitles you to Conservative Tribune news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
You're logged in to Facebook. Click here to log out.
It sums up the Obama administration perfectly: The arrogance of a president who considered his opponent beneath contempt. The sneering put-down of the past that was loved by Obama’s oh-so-modern liberal backers.

(The video in the tweet Woods was passing on clearly originated with an Obama supporter, judging by the implied mockery of the music and the zoom in on Romney’s face. Russia isn’t looking so funny to liberals now.)

What the video really proved, though, is that, as usual, when Democrats are accusing Republicans of something, it’s because they’re guilty of it themselves.

In the case of the Trump-“Russia collusion” fantasy, the party of Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama hope Americans don’t remember the infamous “reset” button of Clinton’s first major initiative of her cursed time as America’s secretary of state.
They’re hoping Americans don’t remember how Obama unilaterally abandoned a planned missile defense screen against Russia in Central Europe back in 2009. Even left-wing news sites like The Guardian covered it then, though the mainstream media says little about it now.

RELATED: James Woods Finds Old Video of Hillary, Links It to Strzok Testimony and the Internet Goes Nuts

They’re hoping Americans don’t remember that it was Obama who was caught on a hot mic pledging the use greater “flexibility” in negotiating with Russia if he won re-election in 2012. Some mainstream media reporters literally do not remember the incident now. (Or pretend not to.)
But clips like this one, passed on to Woods’ politically aware Twitter audience of 1.6 million followers, are going to keep reminding Americans of the truth.

It wasn’t Republican presidents or their political party that were soft on Russians during the Soviet Union days. And it hasn’t been Republican presidents or their political party that have been soft on Russians since the Cold War ended.
Democrats thought Ronald Reagan was wrong to stand up to the Soviets in the 1980s, with the very foreign policy Obama was mocking in that 2012 debate in Boca Raton.

And if Donald Trump were not in the White House today, and if the Democrats didn’t need the phantom of “Russia collusion” to attack him with, they’d be cozying up to Putin just as much as Hillary Clinton did to nail the Uranium One deal Democrats still don’t want to talk about.

With every passing day, the Obama legacy gets more disreputable, thanks to the successes of the Trump administration domestically and the strenth it projects abroad.
And thanks to activist conservatives like Woods, the American people can get some much-needed reminders of how bad things really were when Barack Obama was in the White House.

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers' newsfeeds and is instead promoting mainstream media sources. When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content. Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you.
https://www.westernjournal.com/ct/james-woods-destroys-obama-legacy-shows-americans-the-1-video-barack-wanted-us-to-forget/?utm_source=push&utm_medium=conservativetribune&utm_content=2018-07-15&utm_campaign=manualpost
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 53241
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: Obama not going away

Post  Admin on Thu 05 Jul 2018, 11:01 pm

https://www.westernjournal.com/ct/independence-day-present-for-trump-approval-blows-past-obamas/?

Independence Day Present for Trump: Approval Blows Past Obama’s
BY JOE SAUNDERS 
JULY 5, 2018 AT 7:03AM
 Share on Facebook Tweet Email Print
It’s the kind of news the news media hates.

Marking his second Independence Day as the man in the Oval Office, President Donald Trump saw his approval rating sitting above former President Barack Obama’s at the same point in his first term.

And Trump’s doing it in the face of a mainstream news media assault his predecessor never could have imagined.

According to Rasmussen’s Daily Presidential Tracking Poll,  Trump entered the holiday with 48 percent of Americans approving of the job he’s doing.

That beats Obama’s rating on July 3, 2010, by 3 points, the daily tracking of the Obama administration shows.

TRENDING: James Woods Nails LA City Councilman Arrested at ICE Protest the Way Only Woods Can
He
@hhheomn1
 WOW: Trump's approval rating stands at 48%, according to Rasmussen. Barack Obama, during the same time in office, had approval of only 45%

1:01 AM - Jul 5, 2018
11
See He's other Tweets
Twitter Ads info and privacy
Three points might not seem like much in the grand scheme of things, but when it’s seen in the context of the unflagging worship the news media was bestowing on Obama from before he even won the presidency to his second Fourth of July in office, it’s fair to say Trump is blowing Obama away.

Remember, by July 4, 2010, Obama had been a president with huge majorities in both houses of Congress. The world was still swooning over the first black president, who had been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize the year before for literally nothing he had accomplished yet (or would, in fact, accomplish over the next six, dismal years of his tenure).

He’d signed the Affordable Care Act in March of 2010, and Washington correspondents for mainstream news organizations were mainly concerned with trying to outdo each other in degrading their profession by fawning over Obama, his wife and the whole quasi-socialist program his Democrat Party was trying to foist on the country.

Are you surprised to see Trump’s approval rating beating Obama’s?
Yes No
Completing this poll entitles you to Conservative Tribune news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
You’re logged in to Facebook. Click here to log out.
By contrast, Trump has been battling not only foreign governments in trade disputes but also a nit-picking, overly antagonistic media that’s given his administration an astounding 90 percent negative coverage, according to the hawk-eyed Newsbusters at the Media Research Center.

Even more impressive, Trump’s approval numbers are actually being helped by black and Hispanic voters – exactly the kind of Americans liberals are counting on to power their vaunted (and probably mythical) “blue wave” come November.

Now, it’s a good chance most mainstream media commentators were hoping — along with the Democrat Party — that Trump would never actually reach the milestone of a second Fourth of July in the White House.

By now, special counsel Robert Mueller’s “Russia collusion” investigation should have driven him from office, of course – if Trump’s own perfidy (in liberal eyes) or the inherent criminality (again, in liberal eyes) of his administration hadn’t made it self-destruct.

But neither of those things have happened. And despite the onslaught of media hostility, Americans can see with their own eyes what a Trump administration is accomplishing.

RELATED: Dems Faking Immigration Outrage: Place It 9th on List of Issues They Worry About

Low unemployment, a roaring stock market, demonstrable – if still uncertain – progress toward peace with the always-nettlesome North Koreans.

That’s the kind of news that can’t help but get through the media filter, because Americans have their eyes open. And it’s the kind of reality Americans are experiencing in their daily lives, no matter what the news media keeps telling them.

And that makes the news about what Americans are really thinking the kind of news the news media hates most of all.

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers' newsfeeds and is instead promoting mainstream media sources. When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content. Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 53241
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: Obama not going away

Post  Admin on Wed 04 Jul 2018, 10:43 am

Ben Shapiro Torches Obama, Briefly Silences Bill Maher With History Lesson on His Own Show
BY CILLIAN ZEAL 
JUNE 30, 2018 AT 6:33AM
 https://www.westernjournal.com/ct/ben-shapiro-torches-obama-briefly-silences-bill-maher-history-lesson-his-own-show/?
Did President Trump collude with Russian leader Vladimir Putin during the 2016 election and beyond? Bill Maher certainly thinks so. Yet, in just 30 seconds, conservative pundit Ben Shapiro proved that if the Kremlin had their druthers, they’d probably rather have Barack Obama back in place at 1600 Pennsylvania.

Shapiro appeared on Maher’s HBO show Friday, and heavily on the agenda was Trump’s relationship with Putin and Russia, particularly given that Maher and Shapiro are on opposite sides of the debate.

The discussion began after a discussion of whether or not Trump was a thought leader. Shapiro, who describes himself as a “sometimes-Trumper” and has been critical of the president’s character, claimed that he wasn’t.

“Can he have some thoughts?” Maher said.

“I don’t know, can he?” Shapiro asked with a laugh. “You tell me.”

TRENDING: FBI Caught Red Handed: Set Up Lynch-Clinton Tarmac Meeting, According to IG Report

“Well, it seems like his only thoughts, to me, are to work with Vladimir Putin to make Russia great again,” Maher responded.

VIDEO https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=430&v=SGcdPakoytg

“He’s been a lot harsher on Putin than Obama was, by the way,” Shapiro said, drawing incredulity from Maher.

“Not in terms of his rhetoric, in terms of his actions,” Shapiro continued. “He has armed the people of Ukraine with deadly weapons, something which Obama would not do. Two-hundred Russian soldiers were killed in Syria by U.S. forces under Donald Trump, not under Barack Obama, because Barack Obama said to (former Russian President) Dmitry Medvedyev that he wanted to provide him with flexibility in 2012. Crimea was annexed under Barack Obama.”

Are you a fan of Ben Shapiro?
Yes No
Completing this poll entitles you to Conservative Tribune news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
You’re logged in to Facebook. Click here to log out.
The history lesson drew a stunned “wow” from Maher, who still didn’t want to believe it.

“This reminds me of when Hitchens used to come on the show and tried to convince me that Saddam Hussein was a radical Islamist when he was actually a secularist,” Maher said — referencing the late journalist and polemicist Christopher Hitchens, who supported the invasion of Iraq and the Bush administration’s agenda in the Middle East in spite of the fact that he was an avowed Trotskyist.

Perhaps the great irony of this is that Maher spent the majority of the interview pointing to direct collusion between the president and Vladimir Putin’s Kremlin without citing anything more than the desultory indictments by the Mueller special counsel and a few tweets by the president.

What was arguably Hitchens’ most famous quote was made in regards to religion, but it bears repurposing here: “What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence.”

In terms of collusion, the idea that Trump is the Muscovian Candidate isn’t borne out by any evidence to suggest he’s been easy on Putin. Shapiro also neglected to mention the fact that the Trump administration has authorized air strikes on two occasions against the Russian-backed Assad regime in Syria, something that was hardly viewed with unalloyed joy in the halls of the Kremlin.

RELATED: Watch: Bill Maher Goes After Melania with Sick ‘Mrs. Hitler’ Jacket

Obama, meanwhile, has said he was “very proud” that he had held off striking Syria during his presidency even after drawing a “red line” regarding the use of chemical weapons.

All of this, on balance, is a lot worse for the Putin regime than a few errant tweets or Trump saying he wants Russia back in the G-7. Actions have always mattered more than words in politics, however, even before those words were measured in 280 characters or less.

When it came to actions, Putin loved him some Obama, and he likely would have loved him some Hillary Clinton, too. That’s the evidence, and no amount of aberrant rhetoric can change the facts. When it comes to collusion, perhaps Mr. Maher would do well to listen to Shapiro. If he doesn’t trust Shapiro alone, however, he would also do well to take his late friend’s advice.

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers' newsfeeds and is instead promoting mainstream media sources. When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content. Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 53241
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: Obama not going away

Post  Admin on Sat 30 Jun 2018, 9:26 pm

Ben Shapiro Torches Obama, Briefly Silences Bill Maher With History Lesson on His Own Show
https://www.westernjournal.com/ct/ben-shapiro-torches-obama-briefly-silences-bill-maher-history-lesson-his-own-show/?utm_source=push&utm_medium=conservativetribune&utm_content=2018-06-30&utm_campaign=manualpost
BY CILLIAN ZEAL 
JUNE 30, 2018 AT 6:33AM

 Share on Facebook Tweet Email Print
Did President Trump collude with Russian leader Vladimir Putin during the 2016 election and beyond? Bill Maher certainly thinks so. Yet, in just 30 seconds, conservative pundit Ben Shapiro proved that if the Kremlin had their druthers, they’d probably rather have Barack Obama back in place at 1600 Pennsylvania.

Shapiro appeared on Maher’s HBO show Friday, and heavily on the agenda was Trump’s relationship with Putin and Russia, particularly given that Maher and Shapiro are on opposite sides of the debate.

The discussion began after a discussion of whether or not Trump was a thought leader. Shapiro, who describes himself as a “sometimes-Trumper” and has been critical of the president’s character, claimed that he wasn’t.

“Can he have some thoughts?” Maher said.

“I don’t know, can he?” Shapiro asked with a laugh. “You tell me.”

TRENDING: Peter Fonda’s New Film Nets Measly $30,000 After Actor’s Perverted Attack on Barron Trump

“Well, it seems like his only thoughts, to me, are to work with Vladimir Putin to make Russia great again,” Maher responded.



“He’s been a lot harsher on Putin than Obama was, by the way,” Shapiro said, drawing incredulity from Maher.

“Not in terms of his rhetoric, in terms of his actions,” Shapiro continued. “He has armed the people of Ukraine with deadly weapons, something which Obama would not do. Two-hundred Russian soldiers were killed in Syria by U.S. forces under Donald Trump, not under Barack Obama, because Barack Obama said to (former Russian President) Dmitry Medvedyev that he wanted to provide him with flexibility in 2012. Crimea was annexed under Barack Obama.”

Are you a fan of Ben Shapiro?
Yes No

Completing this poll entitles you to Conservative Tribune news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
You’re logged in to Facebook. Click here to log out.
The history lesson drew a stunned “wow” from Maher, who still didn’t want to believe it.

“This reminds me of when Hitchens used to come on the show and tried to convince me that Saddam Hussein was a radical Islamist when he was actually a secularist,” Maher said — referencing the late journalist and polemicist Christopher Hitchens, who supported the invasion of Iraq and the Bush administration’s agenda in the Middle East in spite of the fact that he was an avowed Trotskyist.

Perhaps the great irony of this is that Maher spent the majority of the interview pointing to direct collusion between the president and Vladimir Putin’s Kremlin without citing anything more than the desultory indictments by the Mueller special counsel and a few tweets by the president.

What was arguably Hitchens’ most famous quote was made in regards to religion, but it bears repurposing here: “What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence.”

In terms of collusion, the idea that Trump is the Muscovian Candidate isn’t borne out by any evidence to suggest he’s been easy on Putin. Shapiro also neglected to mention the fact that the Trump administration has authorized air strikes on two occasions against the Russian-backed Assad regime in Syria, something that was hardly viewed with unalloyed joy in the halls of the Kremlin.

RELATED: Watch: Bill Maher Goes After Melania with Sick ‘Mrs. Hitler’ Jacket

Obama, meanwhile, has said he was “very proud” that he had held off striking Syria during his presidency even after drawing a “red line” regarding the use of chemical weapons.

All of this, on balance, is a lot worse for the Putin regime than a few errant tweets or Trump saying he wants Russia back in the G-7. Actions have always mattered more than words in politics, however, even before those words were measured in 280 characters or less.

When it came to actions, Putin loved him some Obama, and he likely would have loved him some Hillary Clinton, too. That’s the evidence, and no amount of aberrant rhetoric can change the facts. When it comes to collusion, perhaps Mr. Maher would do well to listen to Shapiro. If he doesn’t trust Shapiro alone, however, he would also do well to take his late friend’s advice.

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers' newsfeeds and is instead promoting mainstream media sources. When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content. Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 53241
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: Obama not going away

Post  Admin on Mon 25 Jun 2018, 6:22 pm

Barack Obama will travel to Kenya next month
June 24, 2018
Barack Obama will travel to Kenya next month
Image via Golden Brown / Shutterstock.com
Former President Barack Obama is headed out of the country.
https://www.patriotnewsalerts.com/obama-travel-to-kenya/?utm_medium=ci&utm_source=push&utm_campaign=pnaAccording to reports, the former president will soon be traveling to Portugal, Spain, and South Africa, as well as visiting his father’s homeland of Kenya.

We Are Paying for It
Obama is expected to leave on his global jaunt in early July, then travel for several weeks.

Of course, along with him will be dozens of Secret Service agents to protect him and his family from harm.

With that, the month of July will not be a cheap one for the American taxpayer.

Long Lost Sister
Toward the middle of July, Obama is expected to arrive in Kenya.

While there, he will be making an appearance at a local youth center founded by his sister, Auma Obama.

“Given that his own mission under the Obama Foundation is to inspire and empower people to change the world, his attendance at this event at our ancestral home, where our father was laid to rest, is of great significance to me,” Auma Obama, who shares a father with the former president, said.

The Stops
Barack Obama is also expected to meet with Kenyan president Uhuru Kenyatta while he is in the country.

Additionally, he is scheduled to meet with Raila Odinga, the opposition leader.

Later, Obama will be attending an event in South Africa to honor Nelson Mandela’s birthday.

He is also scheduled to meet President Cyril Ramphosa while there.

Should Obama Be Talking to World Leaders?
Yes
No
Next
Prior to heading to Africa, Obama will be making some quick stops in Spain and Portugal.

One can only imagine the damage he will do, no doubt badmouthing Trump wherever he goes.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 53241
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: Obama not going away

Post  Admin on Fri 22 Jun 2018, 12:31 pm

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/06/21/lawsuit-obama-agency-held-teenage-migrants-brutal-inhumane-conditions/?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_term=daily&utm_content=links&utm_campaign=20180621
Lawsuit: Obama’s Agency Held Teenage Migrants in ‘Brutal, Inhumane Conditions’
1631
lawsuitAlex Wong/Getty Images
21 Jun 20181,459
President Barack Obama’s immigration agency allowed migrant youths as young as 14 to be abused, tied up, left naked in solitary confinement, and denied health treatment at a juvenile detention center in Virginia in 2015 and 2016, says a lawsuit filed on behalf of a Latino migrant.
The lawsuit was settled in January, according to the Associated Press, which does not describe the settlement but does say that officials at Shenandoah Valley Juvenile Center (SVJC) in Staunton, Virginia, denied the claims.

The lawsuit filed on behalf of plaintiff John Doe states:

Doe and other similarly situated young people in SVJC are subject to unconstitutional conditions that shock the conscience, including violence by staff, abusive and excessive use of seclusion and restraints, and denial of necessary mental health care. As a result, Doe has engaged in significant and continuous self-harm, to which SVJC staff and counselors have responded with callous indifference.

These violations reflects a disorganized, untrained and understaffed facility that house immigrant children in brutal, inhumane conditions.

AP reported on sworn statements of jailed teens, including charges that guards stripped off their clothes and strapped them to chairs and placed bags over their heads.

“Whenever they used to restrain me and put me in the chair, they would handcuff me,” a Honduran immigrant who was sent to the facility at 15, said in the AP report. “Strapped me down all the way, from your feet all the way to your chest, you couldn’t really move. … They have total control over you. They also put a bag over your head. It has little holes; you can see through it. But you feel suffocated with the bag on.”

“If you are behaving bad, resisting the staff when they try to remove you from the program, they will take everything in your room away — your mattress, blanket, everything,” a16-year old Latino immigrant detained at the center said in the AP report.

“They will also take your clothes. Then they will leave you locked in there for a while,” he said. “This has happened to me, and I know it has happened to other kids, too.”

A 15-year-old Mexican held at the detention center for nine months said in his sworn statement he was restrained with a bag over his head.

“They handcuffed me and put a white bag of some kind over my head,” he said. “They took off all of my clothes and put me into a restraint chair, where they attached my hands and feet to the chair. They also put a strap across my chest. They left me naked and attached to that chair for two and a half days, including at night.”

AP reported:

In addition to the children’s first-hand, translated accounts in court filings, a former child-development specialist who worked inside the facility independently told The Associated Press this week that she saw kids there with bruises and broken bones they blamed on guards. She spoke on condition of anonymity because she was not authorized to publicly discuss the children’s cases.

The AP did admit that some of the youths detained in Virginia were suspected to be MS-13 gang members and had received “secure placement” because of violent behavior.

The AP report does not mention Obama or any of his cabinet, but repeatedly suggests a link to President Donald Trump.

“Many of the children were sent there after U.S. immigration authorities accused them of belonging to violent gangs, including MS-13,” AP reported, and added, “President Donald Trump has repeatedly cited gang activity as justification for his crackdown on illegal immigration.”

AP reported:

Most children held in the Shenandoah facility who were the focus of the abuse lawsuit were caught crossing the border illegally alone. They were not the children who have been separated from their families under the Trump administration’s recent policy and are now in the government’s care. But the facility there operates under the same program run by the U.S. Office of Refugee Resettlement.

It was not immediately clear whether any separated children have been sent to Shenandoah Valley since the Trump administration in April announced its “zero tolerance” policy toward immigrant families after the lawsuit was filed.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 53241
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Obama Presidential Center Will Cost Taxpayers Almost $200 Million

Post  Admin on Sun 17 Jun 2018, 8:36 pm

Obama Presidential Center Will Cost Taxpayers Almost $200 Million
By Jack Davis 
June 16, 2018 at 9:55am
 Share on Facebook Tweet Email Print
Illinois taxpayers will cough up almost $200 million as part of the state’s plan to improve the area around the Obama Presidential Center, which will be constructed on the South Side of Chicago.
Earlier this month, Gov. Bruce Rauner signed off on a bill that included $174 million for road work near the project and another $50 million to repair a rail stop, the Washington Examiner reported.
“Bringing the Obama Presidential Center to Chicago took leadership and vision, and we are gratified that our partners in Springfield also saw the potential for what this means for all of Illinois. The state’s $174 million investment in infrastructure improvements near the Obama Center on the South Side of Chicago is money well spent,” Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel said in a statement that was released Friday as ground was broken for the rail stop project.
The rail stop project is supported by state and federal tax dollars through a federal grant matched with state money. Emanuel was a one-time chief of staff to former President Barack Obama.
The Obama Center is still in the process of getting all local, state and federal approvals. One issue that has emerged is that the 23-story center would eat up a slice of historic Jackson Park. Some opponents of the project want the park spared, and want the center built on private land.
MORE  https://www.westernjournal.com/obama-presidential-center-will-cost-taxpayers-almost-200-million/?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=newsletter-WJ&utm_campaign=dailyam&utm_content=western-journal
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 53241
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: Obama not going away

Post  Admin on Tue 12 Jun 2018, 12:04 pm

https://www.westernjournal.com/report-obama-holding-secret-one-on-one-meetings-with-potential-2020-candidates/?Report: Obama Holding Secret One-On-One Meetings with Potential 2020 Candidates
By Joe Setyon 
June 11, 2018 at 9:37am
 Share on Facebook Tweet Email Print
Former President Barack Obama has reportedly held multiple one-on-one meetings with potential 2020 Democrat presidential candidates as he looks to help his party regain control of the White House.

Citing multiple sources, Politico was the first to report on the meetings, which have been held in Obama’s Washington, D.C. office. The former president is not set to support or endorse any one candidate, but he reportedly does want to be involved in the Democratic Party’s attempts to bounce back in the 2018 midterms and in 2020.

The meeting have been held in secret, according to Politico, due to the fact that Obama does not like his private interactions to become public.

The nine potential candidates Trump has met with reportedly include Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren, former Vice President Joe Biden and former Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick.

“The president was generous with his time and advice, and he was excited to talk about the future,” said a source who is familiar with one of the meetings.

TRENDING: Trump To Leave Summit Early, Nuclear Talks Moving ‘More Quickly Than Expected’

Obama’s office, though, refused to confirm the meetings to Politico.

In 2016, Democrats had only two major candidates for president — Sanders and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

However, they are expecting a much larger field in 2020, with high-profile figures like California Sen. Kamala Harris, New York Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand and former Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe all rumored to be interested in running.

But not all of those potential candidates have met with Obama, and according to CNN, the one-on-one meetings the former president did hold had little to do with specific strategies.

Will Democrats take back the presidency in 2020?
Yes No
Completing this poll entitles you to The Western Journal news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
“This is not about where you put your Sioux City, Iowa office,” a Democrat source told the network, adding that Obama spends “much more time on how to respond to (President Donald Trump), positioning and broader challenges with the party.”

“He has been very clear about the need for the Democratic Party to rebuild and part of that is lifting up the next generation of leaders,” the Democrat said. “So if people want advice or a gut check or just to come in and look at the challenges we face, he is happy to do that.”

Sanders reportedly contacted Obama to set up their meeting, during which they talked more about the general future of the Democratic Party than whether or not Sanders would run in 2020.

Obama has also reportedly kept in touch with Biden — his former vice president — who is expected to announce his plans for 2020 following the midterms, according to The Hill.

Per Politico, Obama believes that going forward, Democrats should focus less on “kitchen table issues” and more on things that will “stick in the long term,” like the alleged collusion between Trump’s 2016 campaign and Russia.

RELATED: Forward, For Real

Obama has stayed out of the spotlight since he left office in January 2017, but Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer — who has also met with the former president — said he expects Obama to be more visible as he campaigns for Democrat candidates in the 2018 midterms.

“I think it’s great that he’s meeting with people who are interested in the future of the country and the party,” a source with knowledge of one of Obama’s one-on-one meetings told Politico.

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers' newsfeeds and is instead promoting mainstream media sources. When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content. Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you.




Nat. Archives Stumble onto New Obama Scandal — ‘Wholesale Destruction’ of Gov’t Records
BY CILLIAN ZEAL 
JUNE 11, 2018 AT 8:49AM
https://www.westernjournal.com/ct/nat-archives-stumble-onto-new-obama-scandal-wholesale-destruction-of-govt-records/?The archivist in charge of transferring former President Barack Obama’s records into the National Archives has run across a serious problem, according to a report published Sunday: A lot of the records are missing.

“A first-rate librarian, (David) Ferriero has been driving a much-needed digital overhaul and expansion of the National Archives over the nine years of his appointment,” writer Thomas Lipscomb reported for RealClearPolitics. “This will greatly improve the ability of digital search locally and remotely, as well as accessing the files themselves.”

However, that only works if you have the files you need in the first place. And Lipscomb, well, doesn’t.

The former president, it must be noted, signed a law that put electronic communications under the 1950 Federal Records Act. However, it doesn’t seem that his practice is quite what he preaches.

Lipscomb wrote that “the accumulation of recent congressional testimony has made it clear that the Obama administration itself engaged in the wholesale destruction and ‘loss’ of tens of thousands of government records covered under the act as well as the intentional evasion of the government records recording system by engaging in private email exchanges.”

TRENDING: Paranoid KJU Brings ‘Just in Case’ Cargo to Historic Summit

“So far, former President Obama, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, former Attorney General Lynch and several EPA officials have been named as offenders. The IRS suffered record ‘losses’ as well. Former federal prosecutor Andrew McCarthy called it ‘an unauthorized private communications system for official business for the patent purpose of defeating federal record-keeping and disclosure laws.’”

It’s worth noting two things. First, this isn’t a minor thing. Lipscomb argued that “America’s National Archives is facing the first major challenge to its historic role in preserving the records of the United States.”

“What good is the National Archives administering a presidential library, like the planned Obama library in Chicago, if it is missing critical records of interest to scholars?” he wrote. “And what’s to prevent evasion of the entire federal records system by subsequent administrations to suit current politics rather than serve scholars for centuries to come?”

And that’s the second thing. In a break from tradition, Barack Obama’s presidential library is actually opting out of any sort of relationship of the National Archives.

Do you think that the Obama administration deliberately “lost” records to protect its reputation?
Yes No
Continue with Facebook
— or —

Enter your email
Completing this poll entitles you to Conservative Tribune news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
“The Obama Presidential Center in Chicago’s Jackson Park will take a different route, opting out of the presidential library network operated by the National Archives and Records Administration — and the millions of dollars in federal support that go along with membership,” the Chicago Tribune reported back in May.

“In the months leading up to the announcement, it was widely assumed that the center would have a presidential library, full of documents and artifacts, that was part of the NARA system.”

The spin at that point was that Obama’s decision to opt out of a relationship with the National Archives was a good thing. It would allow Obama to escape several regulations set by NARA in terms of both the design and endowment of the library, among other things. Whether or not that was true — or whether or not this has anything to do with the former administration’s destruction of records — is anyone’s guess, although it certainly looks somewhat more suspicious in this light.

This isn’t the first time that a former Democrat president has faced a controversy over documents that are supposed to be housed at the National Archives. Clinton surrogate Sandy Berger was caught stuffing uncatalogued papers from the archives in his clothing while allegedly “reviewing records for a Clinton response to the 9/11 Commission’s considerations of mistakes made leading up to the attack on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon,” Lipscomb noted.

This time, however, the gap in electronic records appears to be a lot bigger, particularly when it comes to Clinton, to Lynch and to the IRS, each of which saw major scandals during the Obama presidency. This could be massive, particularly given that the avoidance of the gaze of the National Archives appears to be totally deliberate. In many ways, the story here is the wholesale destruction of the documents — although quite frankly, bigger scandals could have been hidden within the data.

RELATED: Compare Trump’s G-7 Pic to Obama’s and It’s Suddenly Clear Why Trump Won

“How does David Ferriero plan to deal with this unique challenge to his institution? First, it’s not just his problem, although he must address the realities of gaps in the record and how it will affect plans for the new Obama presidential library,” Lipscomb wrote. “But will there be penalties for violating the 2014 law? Is it even possible to continue the great tradition of maintaining an authentic record center for the United States that President Franklin Roosevelt founded 83 years ago, if that law is not supported?”

The answer to the first question is undoubtedly “no.” As with all other scandals that happened under the Obama administration, Democrats aren’t terribly interested in paying them any attention, and their enmity falls upon anyone who doesn’t follow the playbook. Will this be fatal for the National Archives? Well, the Obama administration has just set a precedent, apparently saying that a president is entitled to protect his legacy at the expense of the law.

That could change, however. Look how many stories there have been over reports that President Donald Trump likes to rip up papers and frantic staff tape them back together so they can comply with the Federal Records Act. This is some of the coverage that story got, via Google News:

Here’s the kind of coverage, meanwhile, that Lipscomb’s report is getting:

Apparently, real document destruction isn’t that big of a deal for the media. But if there’s a comical story regarding Trump, they’re more than willing to run it.

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers' newsfeeds and is instead promoting mainstream media sources. When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content. Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 53241
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: Obama not going away

Post  Admin on Thu 07 Jun 2018, 3:03 pm

AP: Obama Admin Secretly Tried to Let Iran Convert $5.7 Billion Through U.S. Banks
http://www.breitbart.com/news/apnewsbreak-secret-obama-era-license-let-iran-tap-dollars/?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_term=daily&utm_content=links&utm_campaign=20180606
Barack ObamaAP Photo/Thibault Camus
6 Jun 20181,392
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Obama administration secretly sought to give Iran access — albeit briefly — to the U.S. financial system by sidestepping sanctions kept in place after the 2015 nuclear deal, despite repeatedly telling Congress and the public it had no plans to do so.

An investigation by Senate Republicans released Wednesday sheds light on the delicate balance the Obama administration sought to strike after the deal, as it worked to ensure Iran received its promised benefits without playing into the hands of the deal’s opponents. Amid a tense political climate, Iran hawks in the U.S., Israel and elsewhere argued that the United States was giving far too much to Tehran and that the windfall would be used to fund extremism and other troubling Iranian activity.

The report by the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations revealed that under President Barack Obama, the Treasury Department issued a license in February 2016, never previously disclosed, that would have allowed Iran to convert $5.7 billion it held at a bank in Oman from Omani rials into euros by exchanging them first into U.S. dollars. If the Omani bank had allowed the exchange without such a license, it would have violated sanctions that bar Iran from transactions that touch the U.S. financial system.

The effort was unsuccessful because American banks — themselves afraid of running afoul of U.S. sanctions — declined to participate. The Obama administration approached two U.S. banks to facilitate the conversion, the report said, but both refused, citing the reputational risk of doing business with or for Iran.

“The Obama administration misled the American people and Congress because they were desperate to get a deal with Iran,” said Sen. Rob Portman, R-Ohio, the subcommittee’s chairman.

Issuing the license was not illegal. Still, it went above and beyond what the Obama administration was required to do under the terms of the nuclear agreement. Under that deal, the U.S. and world powers gave Iran billions of dollars in sanctions relief in exchange for curbing its nuclear program. Last month, President Donald Trump declared the U.S. was pulling out of what he described as a “disastrous deal.”

The license issued to Bank Muscat stood in stark contrast to repeated public statements from the Obama White House, the Treasury and the State Department, all of which denied that the administration was contemplating allowing Iran access to the U.S. financial system.

Shortly after the nuclear deal was sealed in July 2015, then-Treasury Secretary Jack Lew testified that even with the sanctions relief, Iran “will continue to be denied access to the world’s largest financial and commercial market.” A month later, one of Lew’s top deputies, Adam Szubin, testified that despite the nuclear deal “Iran will be denied access to the world’s most important market and unable to deal in the world’s most important currency.”

Yet almost immediately after the sanctions relief took effect in January 2016, Iran began to complain that it wasn’t reaping the benefits it had envisioned. Iran argued that other sanctions — such as those linked to human rights, terrorism and missile development — were scaring off potential investors and banks who feared any business with Iran would lead to punishment. The global financial system is heavily intertwined with U.S. banks, making it nearly impossible to conduct many international transactions without touching New York in one way or another.

Former Obama administration officials declined to comment for the record.

However, they said the decision to grant the license had been made in line with the spirt of the deal, which included allowing Iran to regain access to foreign reserves that had been off-limits because of the sanctions. They said public comments made by the Obama administration at the time were intended to dispel incorrect reports about nonexistent proposals that would have gone much farther by letting Iran actually buy or sell things in dollars.

The former officials spoke on condition of anonymity because many are still involved in national security issues.

As the Obama administration pondered how to address Iran’s complaints in 2016, reports in The Associated Press and other media outlets revealed that the U.S. was considering additional sanctions relief, including issuing licenses that would allow Iran limited transactions in dollars. Democratic and Republican lawmakers argued against it throughout the late winter, spring and summer of 2016. They warned that unless Tehran was willing to give up more, the U.S. shouldn’t give Iran anything more than it already had.

At the time, the Obama administration downplayed those concerns while speaking in general terms about the need for the U.S. to live up to its part of the deal. Secretary of State John Kerry and other top aides fanned out across Europe, Asia and the Middle East trying to convince banks and businesses they could do business with Iran without violating sanctions and facing steep fines.

“Since Iran has kept its end of the deal, it is our responsibility to uphold ours, in both letter and spirit,” Lew said at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace in March 2016, without offering details.

That same week, the AP reported that the Treasury had prepared a draft of a license that would have given Iran much broader permission to convert its assets from foreign currencies into easier-to-spend currencies like euros, yen or rupees, by first exchanging them for dollars at offshore financial institutions.

The draft involved a general license, a blanket go-ahead that allows all transactions of a certain type, rather than a specific license like the one given to Oman’s Bank Muscat, which only covers specific transactions and institutions. The proposal would have allowed dollars to be used in currency exchanges provided that no Iranian banks, no Iranian rials and no sanctioned Iranian individuals or businesses were involved, and that the transaction did not begin or end in U.S. dollars.

Obama administration officials at the time assured concerned lawmakers that a general license wouldn’t be coming. But the report from the Republican members of the Senate panel showed that a draft of the license was indeed prepared, though it was never published.

And when questioned by lawmakers about the possibility of granting Iran any kind of access to the U.S. financial system, Obama-era officials never volunteered that the specific license for Bank Muscat in Oman had been issued two months earlier.

According to the report, Iran is believed to have found other ways to access its money, possibly by exchanging it in smaller quantities through another currency.

The situation resulted from the fact that Iran had stored billions in Omani rials, a currency that’s notoriously hard to convert. The U.S. dollar is the world’s dominant currency, so allowing it to be used as a conversion instrument for Iranian assets was the easiest and most efficient way to speed up Iran’s access to its own funds.

For example: If the Iranians want to sell oil to India, they would likely want to be paid in euros instead of rupees, so they could more easily use the proceeds to purchase European goods. That process commonly starts with the rupees being converted into dollars, just for a moment, before being converted once again into euros.

U.S. sanctions block Iran from exchanging the money on its own. And Asian and European banks are wary because U.S. regulators have levied billions of dollars in fines in recent years and threatened transgressors with a cutoff from the far more lucrative American market.

Flashback: When Obama Officials Lied to Congress About Iran’s Access to U.S. Banks
http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2018/06/06/flashback-obama-officials-lied-congress-iran-access-u-s-banks/?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_term=daily&utm_content=links&utm_campaign=20180606
US President Barack Obama smiles at the annual White House Correspondent's Association Gala at the Washington Hilton hotel April 25, 2015 in Washington, D.C. The dinner is an annual event attended by journalists, politicians and celebrities. (Photo by Olivier Douliery-Pool/Getty Images)Olivier Douliery-Pool/Getty Images
6 Jun 2018567
A bombshell report released Wednesday by the majority staff of the Senate Homeland Security Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations revealed that the Obama administration secretly plotted to give Iran access to the U.S. financial system as a sweetener for the 2015 nuclear deal.
This effectively helped Iran evade sanctions that were not lifted as part of the JCPOA, as it is formally known. The report also details how Obama officials blatantly lied to Congress and the American people about this special arrangement.

The Senate report cites four occasions when Obama officials “publicly stated that Iranian access to the U.S. financial system was not part of the relief specified in the JCPOA,” detailed as follows:

First, on July 23, 2015, U.S. Treasury Secretary Jack Lew testified before the U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations concerning the nature of the potential sanctions relief contained in the JCPOA.  Secretary Lew stated that the JCPOA would “suspend nuclear-related secondary sanctions,” but that “a number of key sanctions will remain in place.” Specifically, Secretary Lew explained that “Iranian banks will not be able to clear U.S. dollars through New York, hold correspondent account relationships with U.S. financial institutions, or enter into financing arrangements with U.S. banks.” He further testified that “Iran, in other words, will continue to be denied access to the world’s largest financial and commercial market.”

Second, on August 5, 2015, Adam Szubin, the Acting Under Secretary of the Treasury for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence, testified before the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs that “Iran will be denied access to the world’s most important market and unable to deal in the world’s most important currency,” referring to the U.S. financial system and the U.S. dollar. He also stated that “Iranian banks will not be able to clear U.S. dollars through New York, hold correspondent account relationships with U.S. financial institutions, or enter into financing arrangements with U.S. banks.”

Third, in testimony before the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs on September 17, 2015, Mr. Szubin again assured lawmakers that “no Iranian banks can access the U.S. financial system, not to open an account, not to purchase a security, and not even to execute a dollarized transaction where a split–second’s worth of business is done in a New York clearing bank.”

Fourth, on September 16, 2015, Mr. Szubin gave a public address to the Washington Institute for Near East Policy where he discussed the sanctions that would remain after Implementation Day.

There, Mr. Szubin stated: “Iran  will not be able to open bank  accounts with U.S. banks, nor will  Iran be able to access the U.S. banking sector, even for that momentary transaction to, what we call, dollarize a foreign payment. …  That is not in the cards. That is not part of the relief offered under the JCPOA.”

Both Secretary Lew and Mr. Szubin testified that Iran would not have access to the U.S. financial system.  This public testimony mirrored what OFAC and State Department officials told foreign financial institutions and other investors around the world, as detailed in the following section.

The Senate report goes on to discuss the “roadshows” held by Obama administration officials for foreign governments and investors, explaining how sanctions relief under the JCPOA would work. It was repeatedly stated in these roadshows that “the U.S. financial system remained off-limits for foreign financial institutions conducting business on behalf of Iran.”

“U.S. government officials repeated this particular advice – to not use the U.S. financial system for transactions involving Iran – multiple times to bankers and business development leaders in countries including Switzerland, England, and Germany,” the Senate report notes.

At the same time, the roadshows featured a good deal of nudging and winking to the effect that the Obama administration would not vigorously pursue violations that favored Iran. At one of the most important roadshows in London, a Treasury official said violations would be addressed with simple warning letters “95 percent of the time.”

Despite these assurances, the Obama plan to convert $5.7 billion in currency to U.S. dollars fell apart because the two American banks asked to handle the transaction refused the request.

“The Obama administration misled the American people and Congress because they were desperate to get a deal with Iran.  Despite claims both before and after the Iran deal was completed that the U.S. financial system would remain off limits, the Obama administration issued a specific license allowing Iran to convert billions of dollars in assets using the U.S. financial system,” subcommittee chairman Sen. Rob Portman (R-OH) said on Wednesday.
Portman added that the report includes a number of transparency recommendations to “ensure these secret side deals never happen again.”
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 53241
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: Obama not going away

Post  Admin on Tue 05 Jun 2018, 6:30 pm

Bill Clinton: The media was easy on Obama because he was African-American
https://www.conservativeinstitute.org/conservative-news/bill-clinton-on-obama.htm?utm_source=aimtell&utm_campaign=automated_push&utm_medium=push
June 4, 2018

Bill Clinton: The media was easy on Obama because he was African-American
Eric Austin / CCL
Did the mainstream media go easy on Barack Obama during his time in the nation’s highest office? A fellow former president thinks so, and he believes that he knows the reason why.

According to Bill Clinton, the press went easy on Barack Obama because he is “African-American.” Really?

The interview
Clinton’s remarks came on the most recent edition of CBS’s Sunday Morning. The former president has been making the media rounds to promote The President is Missing, a fictional terrorism book that he co-authored with novelist James Patterson.

At one point, Clinton and host Mo Rocca began to discuss the media’s coverage of the investigation into alleged Russia-Trump collusion. Clinton stated that he believes that such reporting has been based on the facts, which caused Rocca to ask:

You hear from Trump supporters who say, ‘You know, the press slobbered all over President Obama. He could do no wrong. And now this guy can do no right. What gives?’ That there’s a kind of whiplash.

“Well, they did treat him differently than other Democrats and Republicans,” responded Clinton.

“Why,” asked Rocca.

“It was the political press. You know, I don’t know. They liked him, and they liked having the first African American president – and he was a good president, I think,” said Clinton.

2016 Presidential race
Although both Democrats, Clinton and Obama have a higher loyalty to power, which they have proven desperate to maintain in their post-presidential lives. And so, it is no surprise that Clinton, supporting his wife in the most recent presidential race, gave speeches critical of Obama.

In 2016, at a rally in Spokane, Washington, Clinton went so far as to call Obama’s time in office “awful.” In full, he said:

But if you believe we can all rise together, if you believe we’ve finally come to the point where we can put the awful legacy of the last eight years behind us and the 7 years before that when we were practicing trickle-down economics and no regulation in Washington, which is what caused the crash, then you should vote for her.

Of course, he was referring to his wife Hillary.

The real explanation
It may come as a surprise to some, although not readers of this publication, that the continued prominence of racism is due in large part to this country’s political left, whose political success often depends on the votes of minority groups. Clinton and Obama know this perfectly well, and strategically adjust their rhetoric to appeal to the black and white world which comes to dominate their thinking.

And so, it is little wonder that Clinton would turn to race as the explanation for the media’s favorable treatment of Barrack Obama. But, it is easy to prove him wrong. How?

All one needs to do is bring up Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas. Thomas, especially after the recent death of colleague Antonin Scalia, is widely considered the High Court’s most conservative justice.

For this, Thomas, despite the fact that he himself is an African-American, receives harsh treatment from the left, which includes the mainstream media.

Is Bill Clinton right about Obama?
Yes
No
Next
Another easy counterexample is Ben Carson. So, sorry Bill, but race is not the answer.

The real explanation is simply that Obama is a liberal, and thus, shares that viewpoint which is constantly being peddled by the mainstream media. The fact that he was the first African-American president – a fact only emphasized by the race-driven left – was just the cherry on top.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 53241
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: Obama not going away

Post  Admin on Tue 05 Jun 2018, 6:17 pm

Ex-Navy Sailor Suing Obama, Comey After Being Pardoned by Trump
https://www.westernjournal.com/ex-navy-sailor-suing-obama-comey-after-being-pardoned-by-trump/?utm_source=push&utm_medium=westernjournalism&utm_content=2018-06-05&utm_campaign=manualpost
By Randy DeSoto 
June 5, 2018 at 6:47am
A former Navy sailor who was pardoned by President Donald Trump in March after pleading guilty to mishandling classified information is planning to sue former President Barack Obama, former FBI Director James Comey and others in the Obama administration for unequal treatment under the law.

Kristian Saucier, 31, pleaded guilty in 2016 to unlawfully retaining national defense information by taking six photos on his cell phone inside the submarine he was serving on in 2009.

Saucier said the pictures were taken as innocent keepsakes to show his family. The photos were deemed “confidential” after they surfaced, when someone found the sailor’s phone in the trash.

“We’ll highlight the differences in the way Hillary Clinton was prosecuted and how my client was prosecuted,” his lawyer, Ronald Daigle, told Fox News. “We’re seeking to cast a light on this to show that there’s a two-tier justice system and we want it to be corrected.”

During an appearance on FNC in March, Saucier argued, “Obviously, there’s two different sets of laws in this country, for the politically elite and for those lower-level individuals, Americans like myself. And I think that’s very upsetting on a basic level for most people. It should be.”

TRENDING: Obama-Era School Policy Caused 9-Year-Old to Become Suicidal, Parents Claim

“I accepted responsibility. I didn’t go to trial. I pleaded guilty. I said, ‘Look, I made a mistake when I was a young kid, and my family still continues … to be punished for that mistake,'” the Navy veteran added.

“Whereas Hillary Clinton not only was not punished, but was allowed to run for the highest office in the country, and that should be very upsetting to the American people.”

FOX & friends
✔️
@foxandfriends
 Former Navy Sailor Kristian Saucier: I mishandled classified info, pled guilty to that mistake and continue to be punished, meanwhile Hillary Clinton gets to run for president

6:45 PM - Mar 4, 2018
4,376
2,189 people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy
The Obama administration chose to prosecute him in criminal court rather than military court.

Do you think the sailor was subject to different treatment than Hillary Clinton?
Yes No
Continue with Facebook
-- or --

Enter your email
 
Completing this poll entitles you to The Western Journal news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
“They used me as an example because of (the backlash over) Hillary Clinton,” Saucier said.

Because of his criminal conviction, Saucier struggled to find work after being dishonorably discharged from the Navy and serving a year in federal prison.

He ended up finding a job as a trash collector in Vermont, but struggled to make ends meet for his wife and their young daughter.

The family’s home went into foreclosure and their cars were repossessed while he was still in prison.

A week after Saucier’s appearance, Trump announced via Twitter that he was pardoning the former sailor.

RELATED: Forward, For Real
Donald J. Trump
✔️
@realDonaldTrump
 Congratulations to Kristian Saucier, a man who has served proudly in the Navy, on your newly found Freedom. Now you can go out and have the life you deserve!

4:52 PM - Mar 10, 2018
85K
23.5K people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy
“Now you can go out and have the life you deserve!” Trump wrote.

The presidential pardon clears Saucier’s criminal record.

“With a pardon there’s no magic wand that that gets waved and makes everything right,” Saucier said, “But I try to stay positive and look forward.”

The veteran now works on design and engineer projects for an industrial boiler company.

“Things are starting to go in the right direction,” Saucier said. “I work with a group of really great people, I get to use my skills set.”

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers' newsfeeds and is instead promoting mainstream media sources. When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content. Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 53241
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: Obama not going away

Post  Admin on Wed 30 May 2018, 8:58 pm

https://www.westernjournal.com/ct/trump-didnt-lose-1500-immigrants/?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=conservative-brief-WJ&utm_campaign=dailypm&utm_content=western-journal
Trump Didn’t Lose 1,500 Immigrant Kids, But Obama ‘Lost’ 4,159
BY JOE SAUNDERS 
MAY 29, 2018 AT 8:33AM
As far as media double standards go, it’s a double helping of hypocrisy.

For the past week, the mainstream media has been filled with headlines claiming that the Trump administration has “lost” almost 1,500 illegal immigrant children who were detained while crossing the border into the United States — from a widely circulated USA Today column to the old #Resistance standby CNN.

But in the latest media misfire aimed at making President Donald Trump look bad, it’s the liberal hero Barack Obama who ends up looking even worse — and the truth is coming from surprising sources.

The basic — and completely wrong — liberal narrative is that a Trump get-tough policy that separates children from illegal immigrants who have been caught trying to enter the country has ended up with authorities losing track of 1,475.

But according to The New York Times — the house organ of the Democrat Party and chief propaganda outlet for the anti-Trump movement — the real story is much different.

First of all, the children in this particular subset of illegal immigrants weren’t even with their families when they were caught. They were traveling unaccompanied by their parents, so there was no separation.

Second, they haven’t even been “lost” in the sense the media is implying.

Instead, they have been placed in the custody of relatives inside the United States who have not responded to follow-up efforts by the Department of Health and Human Services — often because they are illegal immigrants themselves, who have little interest in contact with immigration officials.

Do you think Democrats are being intentionally misleading?
Yes No

Completing this poll entitles you to Conservative Tribune news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
In other words, there are not 1,475 children wandering around the U.S.-Mexico border like some kind of dysfunctional Peter Pan story. They’ve been placed with families in the interior of the United States.

More to the point, an even greater number of children — almost three times as many — were “lost” in the same way by the allegedly all-good and all-caring Obama administration, according to The Times.

“Losing track of children who arrive at the border alone is not a new phenomenon,” The Times reported. “A 2016 inspector general report showed that the federal government was able to reach only 84 percent of children it had placed, leaving 4,159 unaccounted for.”

Does anyone remember CNN, USA TODAY or other mainstream media outlets attacking the Obama administration for deplorable treatment of illegal aliens?

The answer to that would be “no,” because the media and the Democrat Party didn’t have a vested interest in skewing the truth.

RELATED: CNN Interview Goes Wrong as Deported Illegal’s Wife Wrecks Media Narrative

Things are different in the Trump years. And Trump’s new “zero tolerance” policy on illegal immigration — which includes criminal charges against every adult caught trying to enter the country illegally — is the latest front where liberals are attacking.

And if that means making up a lie that Trump’s policy has resulted in almost 1,500 kids being “lost,” that’s just part of the #Resistance strategy.

As reported by The Washington Post (another mainstream media enemy of the Trump administration):

“As mentioned before, the 1,475 children were not separated from their parents at the border. However, many who have expressed outrage online about family separations have been appending their tweets with the hashtags #WhereAreTheChildren or #MissingChildren, intentionally or unintentionally linking the two issues.

“Some who should have been better informed also conflated the two, implying that federal officials had lost 1,500 immigrant children who had been taken from their parents, when this was not the case.”

Preet Bahara, the former United States attorney for the Southern District of New York — a liberal hero who was fired by Trump in 2017 — was among those who, as The Post delicately put it, “should have known better.”
Preet Bharara
✔️
@PreetBharara
 What is more shameful than forcibly separating, in America, parents from infant children at the border? And then, losing track of those children?

4:54 AM - May 26, 2018
80K
31.6K people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy
Well, there are a couple of things more shameful than that.

Lying to the American public, like Bahara is doing, is one of them. (For a layman to confuse immigration policies is one thing. For a former federal prosecutor to get a key element of an accusation wrong almost requires deliberate malice.)

For liberals in the media to denounce a sitting president for alleged inhumanity toward illegal immigrants for one problem, while ignoring a problem three times as big when his predecessor was in office is another.

The reality is, Trump and his administration haven’t “lost” 1,475 children in the way the media desperately wants Americans to believe.

The other reality is that Obama officials really did lose 4,159 children by the current standards of the media/Democrat industrial complex. And the currently outraged liberals never breathed a word about it.

Even in the Trump years, it’s a double standard that’s tough to beat.

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers' newsfeeds and is instead promoting mainstream media sources. When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content. Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 53241
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: Obama not going away

Post  Admin on Wed 30 May 2018, 6:54 pm

http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2018/05/28/liberals-blame-trump-for-immigrant-children-conditions-under-obama/?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_term=daily&utm_content=links&utm_campaign=20180528
Fake News: 
Top Liberals Blame Trump for ‘Awful’ Photos of Obama’s Migrant Detention Centers
17997
FILE - In this June 18, 2014, file photo, detainees sleep in a holding cell at a U.S. Customs and Border Protection processing facility in Brownsville,Texas. More than half of the nearly 60,000 Central America children who have arrived on the U.S.-Mexico border in the past year still don’t have …AP Photos/Eric Gay, Jacquelyn Martin; Edit: BNN
28 May 20185,644
Democratic politicians, journalists, and top staffers in Barack Obama’s White House whipped themselves into a frenzy Sunday, attributing “disturbing” photos of migrant detention centers to President Donald Trump — before discovering the photos were taken during Obama’s second term as president.
The first wave of viral photos, showing immigrant minors sleeping inside enclosed cages, were featured in an AZCentral.com article — but that didn’t stop far-left activists from decrying the photos.

Obama speechwriter Jon Favreau urged followers to “look at these pictures,” adding that the forcing the Trump administration to return the children to their parents was the “only debate that matters” right now.

Farveau, who later deleted the tweet, admitted to sharing photos taken under his former boss’s watch — but still found a way to shift blame onto the Trump administration.

“These awful pictures are from 2014, when the government’s challenge was reconnecting unaccompanied minors who showed up at the border with family or a safe sponsor,” he wrote.

“Today, in 2018, the government is CREATING unaccompanied minors by tearing them away from family at the border.”


Jon Favreau
✔️
@jonfavs
 These awful pictures are from 2014, when the government's challenge was reconnecting unaccompanied minors who showed up at the border with family or a safe sponsor. 

Today, in 2018, the government is CREATING unaccompanied minors by tearing them away from family at the border. https://twitter.com/jakesilverstein/status/1000805432271745025

8:27 PM - May 27, 2018
2,695
2,125 people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy
Antonio Villaraigosa, former Los Angeles mayor and California gubernatorial candidate, said the photos left him “speechless.”

“This is not who we are as a nation,” he added.

Villaraigosa later deleted his post.

View image on Twitter
View image on Twitter

Stephen Miller
✔️
@redsteeze
 Hello @antonio4ca Why did you delete this tweet? Is it because this was 2014 and you are no longer outraged because who this all happened under? Are you no longer speechless? Help explain, thanks.

1:58 AM - May 28, 2018
7,985
4,327 people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy
When confronted on why he deleted the tweet, Villaraigosa completely sidestepped the question.

“Taking children from their parents whether it’s under a Democrat president or a Republican one doesn’t make it any more right,” he snapped. “The key issue is not when it started, but when it will end.

“It’s wrong. It’s wrong for Democrats. It’s wrong for Republicans. It’s wrong for Americans.”


Stephen Miller
✔️
@redsteeze
28 May
Hello @antonio4ca Why did you delete this tweet? Is it because this was 2014 and you are no longer outraged because who this all happened under? Are you no longer speechless? Help explain, thanks. pic.twitter.com/Qe8Pr9Zac1


Antonio Villaraigosa
✔️
@antonio4ca
 Taking children from their parents whether it's under a Democrat president or a Republican one doesn’t make it any more right. The key issue is not when it started, but when it will end. It's wrong. It's wrong for Democrats. It's wrong for Republicans. It's wrong for Americans.

2:49 AM - May 28, 2018
88
783 people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy
CNN reporter Hadas Gold deleted her own tweet, claiming it gave people the “impression” that the photos were recent.


Hadas Gold
✔️
@Hadas_Gold
27 May
Deleted previous tweet because gave impression of recent photos (they’re from 2014)


EducatédHillbilly™️
@RobProvince
 No you did not “give the impression”. You flat out said it. pic.twitter.com/kGJ2PmPVgT

9:46 PM - May 27, 2018
View image on Twitter
4,838
1,628 people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy
New York Times Magazine‘s Editor-in-Chief Jake Silverstein called the photos “disturbing” before deleting his tweet. Shortly after, Silverstein claimed he made the massive factual error because he was “distracted [with his] family on the weekend.”

“Correction: this link, which was going around this morning, is from 2014. Still disturbing, of course, but only indirectly related to current situation. My bad (and a good reminder not to RT things while distracted w family on the weekend).”


Stephen Miller
✔️
@redsteeze
27 May
Editor in chief of the New York Times Magazine also just now discovering how inhumanly  immigrant children were treated in 2014 https://twitter.com/jakesilverstein/status/1000805432271745025


Stephen Miller
✔️
@redsteeze
 This can’t be parodied. Welcome back from your nap guys! pic.twitter.com/dQEUTtH0lF

9:31 PM - May 27, 2018
View image on TwitterView image on Twitter
642
379 people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy
Linda Sarsour, the co-founder of the Women’s March, opted to leave her tweet up, later slamming the U.S.’s immigration system, which she described as a “disaster” long before the Trump administration.


Linda Sarsour
✔️
@lsarsour
 No amnesia here. Our immigration system is a disaster and was a disaster long before Trump came along. Now it will become increasingly worse under this White Supremacist Administration who have made their hatred for immigrants crystal clear.

5:00 AM - May 28, 2018
1,185
710 people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy
Civil rights activist Shaun King, no stranger to spreading fake news about law enforcement, urged his followers to read the dated article.

“I saw this photo floating around and didn’t know if it was real. It is,” he fumed.

“Children of immigrants are being held in cages, like dogs, at ICE detention centers, sleeping on the floor. It’s an abomination.”


Stephen Miller
✔️
@redsteeze
27 May
So weird how Linda Sarsour, an Obama Pod Bro, Shaun King, a NYT editor & a CNN reporter all tweeted the exact same AZ central article thinking it was 2018 & not 2014. How do those things happen? It’s a Scooby mystery that may never be solved


Stephen Miller
✔️
@redsteeze
 Amazing pic.twitter.com/rMX3E38LS3

9:41 PM - May 27, 2018
View image on TwitterView image on TwitterView image on TwitterView image on Twitter
3,292
1,774 people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy
The inaccurately portrayed photos prompted AZCentral.com to issue a public clarification.

“Photos of children at a migrant holding facility have gone viral on social media,” the paper’s official account tweeted. “The pictures are from 2014. They were originally posted with this azcentral article about unaccompanied migrant children who were transported to a facility in Arizona.”


azcentral
✔️
@azcentral
 Photos of children at a migrant holding facility have gone viral on social media. The pictures are from 2014. They were originally posted with this azcentral article about unaccompanied migrant children who were transported to a facility in Arizona. http://azc.cc/1imeXsD 

12:04 AM - May 28, 2018

First peek: Immigrant children flood detention center
U.S. Customs and Border Protection briefly opened the doors of a holding facility for hundreds of immigrant children shipped to Arizona.

azcentral.com
887
1,225 people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy
While AZCentral’s story claimed to have the “first” look at the Obama ICE detention centers, the paper published its photos nearly two weeks after Breitbart Texas first revealed leaked images of these facilities in June 2014. The Breitbart Texas scoop set off a national debate on illegal border crossings that pushed immigration to the forefront of America’s national elections in both 2014 and 2016.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 53241
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: Obama not going away

Post  Admin on Wed 30 May 2018, 5:57 pm

https://www.westernjournal.com/viral-photo-of-caged-children-actually-from-obama-era-nothing-to-do-with-trump/?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=conservative-brief-WJ&utm_campaign=dailypm&utm_content=western-journal
Viral Photo of Caged Children Actually from Obama Era, Nothing To Do with Trump
By Jack Davis 
May 28, 2018 at 7:05am
 Share on Facebook  Tweet  Email  Print
Activists attacked the Trump administration Sunday for its treatment of children who were detained at the border, based upon a picture that showed children sleeping in a cage.
There was only one flaw in the tweets that called the treatment “inhumane” and laid it at the door of President Donald Trump.
The image was from an Arizona newspaper report from 2014, during the second term of former President Barack Obama, The Daily Caller reported.
Former Obama speechwriter Jon Favreau began the avalanche of tweets with a since-deleted comment.
“This is happening right now, and the only debate that matters is how we force our government to get these kids back to their families as fast as humanly possible,” Favreau wrote. He added a link to the image, which was part of an Arizona Republic photo gallery from 2014.
TRENDING: The Top 5 Patriotic Cities in the US – Did Yours Make the Cut?
A series of tweets followed as many used the outdated image and applied it as though it was current.
“Children of immigrants are being held in cages, like dogs, at ICE detention centers, sleeping on the floor. It’s an abomination,” Shaun King tweeted.
View image on Twitter
Shaun King

@ShaunKing
 I saw this photo floating around and didn’t know if it was real. 
It is. 
Children of immigrants are being held in cages, like dogs, at ICE detention centers, sleeping on the floor. It’s an abomination. 
FULL STORY: https://www.azcentral.com/picture-gallery/news/politics/immigration/2014/06/18/first-glimpse-of-immigrant-children-at-holding-facility/10808687/

6:29 PM - May 27, 2018
21.1K
25.2K people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy
Others followed.
Qasim Rashid, Esq.

@MuslimIQ
27 May
Beautiful child.
Imagine the horror that in your most desperate moment:
•Armed men strip him from you as he cries
•Don’t tell you where they’re taking him
•Lose him to human traffickers
No parent should ever suffer that. Stop the US policy enforcing it.#WhereAreTheChildren https://twitter.com/ivankatrump/status/1000770717628104710
Qasim Rashid, Esq.

@MuslimIQ
 The US Govt is holding migrant children in small cages like they are animals--just as 45 describes them. 
This is horrific. This is inhumane. This cannot stand. #ThisIsAmerica https://www.azcentral.com/picture-gallery/news/politics/immigration/2014/06/18/first-glimpse-of-immigrant-children-at-holding-facility/10808687/
7:11 PM - May 27, 2018
First glimpse of immigrant children at holding facility
azcentral.com
576
565 people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy
Linda Sarsour

@lsarsour
 Take a look at these photos. #WhereAreOurChildren https://www.azcentral.com/picture-gallery/news/politics/immigration/2014/06/18/first-glimpse-of-immigrant-children-at-holding-facility/10808687/
6:19 PM - May 27, 2018
First glimpse of immigrant children at holding facility
azcentral.com
552
2,078 people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy
Context for the picture was provided by Fox News, which noted that the picture was taken at a time when immigration officials had detained more than 1,000 children who illegally crossed America’s Southern Border.
Controversy over the image reflects the debate over immigration policy that separates children from their parents.
Trump has called for changing that policy as part of broad-based immigration policy reform.
RELATED: Trump Slams Disney CEO for Double Standard in ABC’s ‘Roseanne’ Cancellation

Donald J. Trump

@realDonaldTrump
 Put pressure on the Democrats to end the horrible law that separates children from there parents once they cross the Border into the U.S. Catch and Release, Lottery and Chain must also go with it and we MUST continue building the WALL! DEMOCRATS ARE PROTECTING MS-13 THUGS.
2:59 PM - May 26, 2018
88.7K
84.8K people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy
Even after the true origin of the picture was revealed, few of those who tweeted it clarified that the picture was from Obama’s days in the White House.
One who did was Jake Silverstein, editor in chief of the New York Times Magazine.
Jake Silverstein

@jakesilverstein
 Correction: this link, which was going around this morning, is from 2014. Still disturbing, of course, but only indirectly related to current situation. My bad (and a good reminder not to RT things while distracted w family on the weekend). https://twitter.com/jakesilverstein/status/1000805432271745025
9:33 PM - May 27, 2018
171
2,022 people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy
“Correction: this link, which was going around this morning, is from 2014. Still disturbing, of course, but only indirectly related to current situation. My bad (and a good reminder not to RT things while distracted w family on the weekend),” he tweeted.
Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers' newsfeeds and is instead promoting mainstream media sources. When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content. Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 53241
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Obama administration supplied weapons which landed in Al Qaeda’s hands

Post  Admin on Thu 17 May 2018, 9:46 pm

Obama administration supplied weapons which landed in Al Qaeda’s hands
https://www.patriotnewsalerts.com/obama-weapons-al-qaedas-hands/?utm_medium=ci&utm_source=push&utm_campaign=pna
May 16, 2018
Obama administration supplied weapons which landed in Al Qaeda’s hands
Image via ChameleonsEye / Shutterstock.com
It has long been suspected by many that former President Barack Obama refrained from doing all he could to “degrade and destroy” various Islamic terror groups, and some even suspect that he covertly helped them.

Now a report has emerged which appears to confirm that his administration allowed, if not facilitated, the transfer of weapons into the hands of terrorists affiliated with Al Qaeda and the Islamic State group.

According to Right Wing News, citing a report in December 2017, an international arms monitoring group known as Conflict Armament Research claimed to have uncovered proof that Obama’s CIA supplied weapons to terrorist groups.

Those researchers studied the weapons recovered from retreating Islamic State group fighters over the past several years.

They found that some heavy weapons supplied to Syrian “freedom fighters” had been used by the terrorists within mere months after delivery.

Anti-war activist Cindy Sheehan, who has bashed both former President George W. Bush and Obama for their Middle East military ventures, stated, “It’s no accident that US-supplied weapons made it into the hands of ISIS.”

She suspects that Obama wanted to further destabilize the region to gain control over vital resources, and said, “The CIA wanted the weapons to get into the hands of the extremists.”

“I think it is incorrect to assume that the CIA/US is losing control of its weapons,” Sheehan added. Instead, she believed “Washington and the CIA wanted the Daesh forces in Syria to have control of many U.S. supplied heavy weapons, including missiles.”

The CAR researchers also claimed to discover that it wasn’t just weapons that quickly ended up in the hands of terrorists, but also ammunition and chemical precursors used to make explosives.

Though purported to be a covert operation, it was widely known that Obama’s administration was giving weapons and supplies to the so-called “moderate” rebels fighting against Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad, weapons which were quickly handed over or captured by Al Qaeda and Islamic State group fighters.

Do you believe Obama supplied weapons to terrorist groups?
Yes
No
Next
Thankfully, President Donald Trump put an end to that program in 2017 while ramping up the fight against the brutal terrorists.
If this report of Obama’s people knowingly allowing weapons to end up in the hands of terrorists is true, he needs to be held responsible for what is essentially crimes against humanity and treason against the United States.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 53241
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: Obama not going away

Post  Admin on Thu 10 May 2018, 6:32 pm

World Israel News
Obama, Kerry Slam Trump’s Withdrawal from Iran Deal
May 9, 2018
Obama, Kerry slam Trump’s withdrawal from Iran nuclear dealFormer President Barack Obama and former Secretary of State John Kerry. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)
call the president’s announcement to nix it a “serious mistake.”
By: Batya Jerenberg, World Israel News
It was the signature deal of Barack Obama’s presidency, and President Trump’s dramatic announcement Tuesday that he was withdrawing from it engendered very sharp reactions from both the former president and his secretary of state, John Kerry, who oversaw the negotiations with Iran.
Obama reiterated the main argument he made when Congress was debating in 2015 whether to agree to the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), the formal name of the nuclear accord.
“Without the JCPOA, the United States could eventually be left with a losing choice between a nuclear-armed Iran or another war in the Middle East,” he said, adding that a nuclear Iran “could embolden an already dangerous regime; threaten our friends with destruction; pose unacceptable dangers to America’s own security; and trigger an arms race in the world’s most dangerous region.”
He also invoked the upcoming US negotiations with North Korea as another reason why the president’s decision was “so misguided.”
“The consistent flouting of agreements that our country is a party to, risks eroding America’s credibility, and puts us at odds with the world’s major powers,” his statement continued.
What Obama left out of his statement is that the JCPOA was an international compact that was entered into by the United States only through an executive agreement signed by Obama. It was never a treaty ratified by Congress. The White House deliberately constructed it differently since a treaty needs to be approved by two-thirds of Congress, a hurdle which many believe the JCPOA never could have overcome.
Indeed, over 50 senators voted to disapprove the deal the three times they tried, while in the House of Representatives the various resolutions introduced against different parts of the deal were handily won by deal’s opponents. However, the requirement in this case was to get veto-proof and filibuster-proof majorities to kill the accord, and this could not be done.
Kerry claims withdrawal hurts Israel
Kerry’s condemnation of the pullout perhaps surprisingly mentioned Israel specifically as being a potential loser from Trump’s move, even though Jerusalem has always stood firmly against the accord and praised Trump unstintingly for keeping his campaign promise to get America out of the “horrible deal,” as Trump repeatedly called it.
“Today’s announcement weakens our security, breaks America’s word, isolates us from our European allies, puts Israel at greater risk, empowers Iran’s hardliners, and reduces our global leverage to address Tehran’s misbehavior, while damaging the ability of future Administrations to make international agreements,” Kerry said in his statement.
MORE https://worldisraelnews.com/obama-kerry-slam-trumps-withdrawal-iran-nuclear-deal/?


WATCH: Counter-terrorism expert debunks Obama’s Iran deal reaction
https://worldisraelnews.com/counter-terrorism-expert-debunks-obamas-iran-deal-reaction/?
 May 9, 2018
 Print  Email  121 Comments
While former president Barack Obama says abandoning the Iran nuclear agreement poses “unacceptable dangers to America’s own security,” Republican congressman and counter-terrorism expert Brian Mast casts serious doubt on Obama’s statement.
https://worldisraelnews.com/counter-terrorism-expert-debunks-obamas-iran-deal-reaction/?
Fox News
Published on 8 May 2018
Former president says abandoning the JCPOA poses 'unacceptable dangers to America's own security'; reaction from Republican Congressman Brian Mast on 'Fox News @ Night with Shannon Bream.'
Fox News
Published on 8 May 2018
Former president says abandoning the JCPOA poses 'unacceptable dangers to America's own security'; reaction from Republican Congressman Brian Mast on 'Fox News @ Night with Shannon Bream.'
Obama criticizes Trump's decision to exit Iran deal
WATCH https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=20&v=ZScUaHnTLco&ab_channel=FoxNews
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 53241
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: Obama not going away

Post  Admin on Thu 10 May 2018, 5:23 pm

Obama got played by Iran, and Israel proved it!
By Avi Abelow -  May 6, 2018 12248 0
Share on Facebook
Tweet
President Obama failed humanity. He failed to protect the freedom loving world, including the USA, from Iran, the biggest terror-supporting state in the world.


These revelations about Iran show Obama got played!
Tipping Point With Liz Wheeler on OAN
Published on 1 May 2018
twitter.com/liz_wheeler
facebook.com/officiallizwheeler
WATCH https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U_yLKeKAY34&ab_channel=TippingPointWithLizWheeleronOAN

Prime Minister Netanyahu warned America that the Iran deal was dangerous. President Obama did not want to listen. He pushed through the horrible nuclear deal even though Netanyahu pointed out how dangerous it was.  Last week Netanyahu revealed Iranian documents that prove that the deal was based on Iranian lies. It is clear to all that Obama was either a fool who allowed himself to make a deal based on lies. Or, he was a dangerous leader who made a deal even though he knew Iran was lying. Which is worse?

Read more about Netanyahu’s bombshell speech revealing the Iranian nuclear documents.

Iran didn’t fear President Obama. Iran knew that he wasn’t a leader who kept his word. He was all bluster and bluff. Like his famous red line threat to Syria if it used chemical weapons.  When Syria used chemical weapons again, Obama did nothing. There is one thing worse than a leader not leading.  It is a leader who makes empty threats and whose words are meaningless.

He made America look like a fool. He put Americans in danger.  In addition, he endangered Israel and emboldened tyrants around the world to push the boundaries of peace and nuclear proliferation. He did all of this because Obama was too weak to do anything to stop Iran. So President Trump today has a choice. Continue to be played the fool like Obama by Iran, who hides their nuclear blueprints in secret vaults. Or President Trump can indeed ditch the phony Iran nuclear deal as he proclaimed and instead show us what real, strong, tough American leadership looks like. Our country needs it.


https://israelunwired.com/prime-minister-iran-lied/
Bombshell Speech by Prime Minister Netanyahu Unmasks Iran’s Lies to the whole world
By Phil Schneider -  May 1, 2018 7375 0
Share on Facebook
Tweet
Prime Minister Netanyahu just made it clear that Israel has perfectly clear evidence – and tons of it – that Iran is full of it.  The Israeli secret service delivered 100% clear proof that Iran lied and continues to lie about nuclear weapons.
WATCH 2 VIDEOS
I just revealed something the world has never seen before.
Netanyahu continues to be at the forefront of the fight to keep nuclear weapons out of Israel’s most dangerous foe – Iran.  Prime Minister Netanyahu clarifies exactly what Iran did to Obama, the EU, and all foreign leaders.  Iran lied to them – plain and simple.  The Obama administration said hundreds of times that Iran was in compliance with the signed agreement.  In truth, Iran did not only NOT comply with the agreements.  Iran had no intention whatsoever to comply with the agreements.  Barack Obama turned Iran’s compliance into a policy point.  This was 100% false.  The Iranian leaders are liars.

Worthless Signatures
The strong incontrovertible evidence that Israel just displayed serves as a powerful reminder.  Dictators sign pieces of paper without any intention of fulfilling anything they sign on.  In Pre-World War II Europe, Neville Chamberlain was proud of what he accomplished when he met Adolf Hitler.  He got a signature!  The Soviet Union believed that Germany would not invade them after Germany and the Soviet Union signed an agreement to split up Poland.  But German signatures were simple tactics of stalling an enemy till a future date.  The signatures meant nothing else to the Germans.  The signatures of the Iranians were nothing but a stalling tactic by the Iranians.  Barack Obama was duped by the Iranians – period.

President Trump needs to decide how to get out of the horrible and worthless agreement with the Iranians.  But any reasonable person now knows that lies and dictators go hand in hand.  The Iranian leadership are dictators.  We need to treat all Iranians statements as potentially true – but probably lies.  We need to judge the Iranians on one thing – actions.

This message must be shared and spread worldwide to unmask Iran’s lies!


Full Version
WATCH 19.48 MINS 
PM Netanyahu Reveals the Iranian Secret Atomic Archive
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pkihrV4cZLE&ab_channel=IsraeliPM
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 53241
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: Obama not going away

Post  Admin on Thu 10 May 2018, 5:03 pm

Obama’s gift to Iran that just threatened Israel like never before
https://israelunwired.com/obamas-gift-iran-threatened-israel-like-never-before/
By Avi Abelow -  March 10, 2018 20074 0
Share on Facebook
Tweet
Past President Barak Obama was an unmitigated disaster for Israel with regards to his multiple blunders and policies vis a vis Iran.
‘Gifts to Iran: An Obama-Era Blunder’
WATCH 4.55 mins
Obama’s gift to Iran that just threatened Israel like never before
https://israelunwired.com/obamas-gift-iran-threatened-israel-like-never-before/
By Avi Abelow -  March 10, 2018 20074 0
Share on Facebook
Tweet

Past President Barak Obama was an unmitigated disaster for Israel with regards to his multiple blunders and policies vis a vis Iran.
‘Gifts to Iran: An Obama-Era Blunder’
WATCH 4.55 mins
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Po9wk1e32cE


US Drone in the Hands of Iran
Just a few weeks ago, an Iranian stealth drone flew into Israeli airspace. This Iranian drone was not an Iranian invention. Back in December 2011, Iran successfully landed a fully functioning US made Lockheed Martin Sentinel stealth drone –  that it then copied. This was one of the biggest intelligence losses to the USA. At the time, then President Barack Obama asked Iran to return the stealth drone. Obviously, they did not return the drone. Former Vice President Dick Cheney said at the time that the intelligence loss was significant and that the USA should have gone into Iran to retrieve the drone. He said “It would have been a fairly simple operation.”

Instead of honoring Obama’s request to return the drone, Iran stole the intelligence information.  They then reverse engineered it and developed their own stealth drones. It was this drone that was then flown into Israeli airspace that Israel shot down.

A Disastrous Obama Policy Direction
This was only one of the numerous blunders of then President Obama with the Iranian regime.  Obama also handed over to them a total of $1.7 billion in cash!  Much of that money was then transferred to various terror organizations and operations run by Iran around the Middle East. Even according to the State Department, this country is one of the biggest state sponsors of terror in the world. It is beyond boggling that a US President would willingly hand over so much money – in cash – to such a rogue actor on the world state.

His policy direction vis-a-vis Iran began right when he began his first term in office.  In 2009, President Obama offered a “new beginning” on Iranian State TV.  He said very clearly, right from the start, “my administration is committed to diplomacy.”  What he forgot to mention is that he prioritized diplomacy over the most basic priorities of a President.  Instead of doing everything necessary to protect America and the freedom-loving world from the growing threat of Iranian terror and nuclear capabilities, he held talks.

Today, we in Israel are on the frontlines, paying the price for eight years of Obama’s mishandling of Iran. Instead of stopping their terror and nuclear ambitions, he emboldened them.Obama’s gift to Iran that just threatened Israel like never before
https://israelunwired.com/obamas-gift-iran-threatened-israel-like-never-before/
By Avi Abelow -  March 10, 2018 20074 0
Share on Facebook
Tweet

Past President Barak Obama was an unmitigated disaster for Israel with regards to his multiple blunders and policies vis a vis Iran.
‘Gifts to Iran: An Obama-Era Blunder’
WATCH 4.55 mins
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Po9wk1e32cE


US Drone in the Hands of Iran
Just a few weeks ago, an Iranian stealth drone flew into Israeli airspace. This Iranian drone was not an Iranian invention. Back in December 2011, Iran successfully landed a fully functioning US made Lockheed Martin Sentinel stealth drone –  that it then copied. This was one of the biggest intelligence losses to the USA. At the time, then President Barack Obama asked Iran to return the stealth drone. Obviously, they did not return the drone. Former Vice President Dick Cheney said at the time that the intelligence loss was significant and that the USA should have gone into Iran to retrieve the drone. He said “It would have been a fairly simple operation.”

Instead of honoring Obama’s request to return the drone, Iran stole the intelligence information.  They then reverse engineered it and developed their own stealth drones. It was this drone that was then flown into Israeli airspace that Israel shot down.

A Disastrous Obama Policy Direction
This was only one of the numerous blunders of then President Obama with the Iranian regime.  Obama also handed over to them a total of $1.7 billion in cash!  Much of that money was then transferred to various terror organizations and operations run by Iran around the Middle East. Even according to the State Department, this country is one of the biggest state sponsors of terror in the world. It is beyond boggling that a US President would willingly hand over so much money – in cash – to such a rogue actor on the world state.

His policy direction vis-a-vis Iran began right when he began his first term in office.  In 2009, President Obama offered a “new beginning” on Iranian State TV.  He said very clearly, right from the start, “my administration is committed to diplomacy.”  What he forgot to mention is that he prioritized diplomacy over the most basic priorities of a President.  Instead of doing everything necessary to protect America and the freedom-loving world from the growing threat of Iranian terror and nuclear capabilities, he held talks.

Today, we in Israel are on the frontlines, paying the price for eight years of Obama’s mishandling of Iran. Instead of stopping their terror and nuclear ambitions, he emboldened them.



US Drone in the Hands of Iran
Just a few weeks ago, an Iranian stealth drone flew into Israeli airspace. This Iranian drone was not an Iranian invention. Back in December 2011, Iran successfully landed a fully functioning US made Lockheed Martin Sentinel stealth drone –  that it then copied. This was one of the biggest intelligence losses to the USA. At the time, then President Barack Obama asked Iran to return the stealth drone. Obviously, they did not return the drone. Former Vice President Dick Cheney said at the time that the intelligence loss was significant and that the USA should have gone into Iran to retrieve the drone. He said “It would have been a fairly simple operation.”

Instead of honoring Obama’s request to return the drone, Iran stole the intelligence information.  They then reverse engineered it and developed their own stealth drones. It was this drone that was then flown into Israeli airspace that Israel shot down.

A Disastrous Obama Policy Direction
This was only one of the numerous blunders of then President Obama with the Iranian regime.  Obama also handed over to them a total of $1.7 billion in cash!  Much of that money was then transferred to various terror organizations and operations run by Iran around the Middle East. Even according to the State Department, this country is one of the biggest state sponsors of terror in the world. It is beyond boggling that a US President would willingly hand over so much money – in cash – to such a rogue actor on the world state.

His policy direction vis-a-vis Iran began right when he began his first term in office.  In 2009, President Obama offered a “new beginning” on Iranian State TV.  He said very clearly, right from the start, “my administration is committed to diplomacy.”  What he forgot to mention is that he prioritized diplomacy over the most basic priorities of a President.  Instead of doing everything necessary to protect America and the freedom-loving world from the growing threat of Iranian terror and nuclear capabilities, he held talks.

Today, we in Israel are on the frontlines, paying the price for eight years of Obama’s mishandling of Iran. Instead of stopping their terror and nuclear ambitions, he emboldened them.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 53241
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: Obama not going away

Post  Admin on Thu 10 May 2018, 4:46 pm

https://israelunwired.com/obama-denounces-trumps-decision-to-pull-out-of-iran-deal/
Obama Denounces Trump’s Decision To Pull Out of Iran Deal
By Avi Abelow -  May 9, 2018 4674 0
President Trump is continuing to trash Obama’s legacy and Obama is livid. Obama’s response to Trump killing his nuclear deal shows how delusional Obama was as a US President.  He always manages to sound so “presidential,” but if you really think about what he says, you see that he was a dangerous fraud!!!

Obama’s Response
“Leaving the (Iran nuclear) agreement could embolden an already dangerous regime; threaten our friends with destruction; pose unacceptable dangers to America’s own security, and trigger an arms race in the region’s most dangerous regime.”

He himself admitted that Iran is a DANGEROUS regime!  Yet his nuclear deal only pushed off the dangerous Iranian regime from attaining a nuclear bomb for a decade, not stopping them. Even wore than that, Obama himself positioned the Iran nuclear deal to help dangerous Iran become the regional power it wanted to be. He says so himself in this video interview back in July 2015. “Iran Will Be And Should Be A Regional Power.”
Leadership?
Is this the type of talk of a leader who wants to stop an enemy of the United States from being a threat to the USA?

In the FOX news video above, US Congressman Brian Mast (FL) replies to Obama’s reaction to Trump’s killing his nuclear deal. “If you look at the eight years of Obama’s administration, you see an administration that ignored and appeased our enemies that emboldened them.”

“You do not make peace with your enemies. You make peace with former enemies. And we shouldn’t have been trying to negotiate with an existing enemy.”

That was exactly the problem of Obama’s administration. They appeased US enemies and made the world a lot more dangerous. Thank G-d, Trump was elected President, and he is trying to undo the horrible damage that Obama did as President.

Leaders are only successful in stopping a war when they are willing to go the distance and go to war. President Trump knows that.

Presumably, Trump’s predecessor knew that as well, but he wanted to help Iran become a regional superpower. This, even though Iran is an enemy of the US, a dangerous regime, and are designated as a state supporter of terror by the US State Department.

How did Americans vote for that man to be President not once but twice?

Thank G-d we now have President Trump!
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 53241
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: Obama not going away

Post  Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 1 of 2 1, 2  Next

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum