Who is online?
In total there are 16 users online :: 0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 16 Guests :: 1 Bot

None

[ View the whole list ]


Most users ever online was 111 on Thu 12 Dec 2013, 2:28 am
Latest topics
» ISRAEL VIDEO'S
Yesterday at 8:58 pm by Admin

» US & NORTH Korea Summit June 12
Yesterday at 8:51 pm by Admin

» CHRISTIAN NEWS NETWORK
Yesterday at 7:28 pm by Admin

» Who Killed Jesus?
Yesterday at 6:27 pm by Admin

» Why Is It Called An Ark?
Yesterday at 5:17 pm by Admin

» The Ark On Wheels And The Shocking Fate Of Uzzah
Yesterday at 5:05 pm by Admin

»  Chip Brogden CHURCH WITHOUT WALLS
Yesterday at 4:59 pm by Admin

» PROPHESY NEWS WATCH
Yesterday at 4:44 pm by Admin

» Five Undeniable Facts of Life
Yesterday at 4:28 pm by Admin

» Viral post purports to show the difference between Obama and Trump’s immigration policies
Yesterday at 4:26 pm by Admin

» ENDTIME HEADLINES
Yesterday at 11:19 am by Admin

» Delrifkah: HEBREW SAGE MIGHT SAY.
Yesterday at 10:57 am by Admin

» +Dev+ Michael D. Inman
Yesterday at 10:44 am by Admin

» WORTHY NEWS
Yesterday at 10:22 am by Admin

» Daily Disciples
Yesterday at 10:20 am by Admin

» HEAVEN LETTERS
Yesterday at 10:12 am by Admin

»  HONEST REPORTING Defending Israel from Media Bias plz read REGULAR UPDATES
Mon 18 Jun 2018, 10:33 pm by Admin

» German leader Angela Merkel could soon be ousted over immigration crisis
Mon 18 Jun 2018, 10:20 pm by Admin

» ISRAEL HISTORY
Mon 18 Jun 2018, 9:54 pm by Admin

»  BRITAIN NEWS AND ALERT's
Mon 18 Jun 2018, 9:52 pm by Admin

Navigation
 Portal
 Index
 Memberlist
 Profile
 FAQ
 Search

If Hillary Goes Down So Will Obama

Page 1 of 2 1, 2  Next

Go down

Re: If Hillary Goes Down So Will Obama

Post  Admin on Mon 18 Jun 2018, 9:23 am

https://www.westernjournal.com/ct/billionaire-clinton-obama-crony-caught-in-massive-fraud-scandal/?utm_source=push&utm_medium=westernjournalism&utm_content=2018-06-17&utm_campaign=manualpost
Billionaire Clinton, Obama Crony Caught in Massive Fraud Scandal
BY CILLIAN ZEAL 
JUNE 17, 2018 AT 10:16AM

 Share on Facebook  Tweet  Email  Print
In October of 2015, Elizabeth Holmes, the CEO of medical device startup Theranos, declared that “Every time you see a glass ceiling there’s an ‘iron woman’ underneath it.” America had every reason to believe she was one of them.

She was the “self-made billionaire” head of a company that was valued at $9 billion, which was at one point more than Uber or Spotify. Its Edison platform promised a revolutionary blood test that only required a finger prick as opposed to blood drawn from a vein. Bill Clinton interviewed her with Alibaba founder Jack Ma in an event for the Clinton Global Initiative. Barack Obama appointed her as a Presidential Ambassador for Global Entrepreneurship. She raised money for Hillary Clinton’s presidential run.

On Friday, Holmes was indicted on wire fraud charges by federal prosecutors in the Northern District of California. Theranos is very close to being liquidated, basically having lapsed into “Enron 2: Electric Boogaloo.”

As it turned out, its “revolutionary platform” could barely perform a few of the 240 tests the company had promised, and even then it didn’t perform them well. As Vanity Fair reports, Holmes, 34, could be spending decades in jail, all because the company she started in 2003 after dropping out of Stanford apparently turned out to be little more than a way to spend investors’ dollars, poorly.

“According to the indictment, Holmes and (Theranos COO and president Ramesh) Balwani used advertisements and solicitations to encourage and induce doctors and patients to use Theranos’s blood testing laboratory services, even though the defendants knew Theranos was not capable of consistently producing accurate and reliable results for certain blood tests,” a statement from the U.S. Attorney’s Office read. “The tests performed on Theranos technology, in addition, were likely to contain inaccurate and unreliable results.”

TRENDING: Liberals Spread Viral Photo of Child in Cage, Silenced After Learning Who Was Really Behind Photo`

“The indictment alleges that the defendants used a combination of direct communications, marketing materials, statements to the media, financial statements, models, and other information to defraud potential investors. Specifically, the defendants claimed that Theranos developed a revolutionary and proprietary analyzer that the defendants referred to by various names, including as the TSPU, Edison, or minilab. The defendants claimed the analyzer was able to perform a full range of clinical tests using small blood samples drawn from a finger stick. The defendants also represented that the analyzer could produce results that were more accurate and reliable than those yielded by conventional methods — all at a faster speed than previously possible.”

In addition to the criminal indictment, Holmes has already agreed to pay a civil penalty of $500,000 to the Securities and Exchange Commission for fraud in an agreement that mandated she not be able to head a public company for 10 years. (Theranos is a privately held company, although Holmes stepped down as CEO on Friday after her indictment.)

So, how did Elizabeth Holmes sucker so many people? It’s worth noting that this is a bipartisan scandal in many ways. Before he became defense secretary, James Mattis served on Theranos’ board, as did former Reagan administration Secretary of State George Shultz. (Shultz’s grandson was one of the whistleblowers on Theranos’ alleged illegal activity, according to The Wall Street Journal.) According to The New York Times, media mogul Rupert Murdoch and Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos lost huge amounts of money in the enterprise.

However, each of them seemed to have been taken either by the science behind Theranos’ device or the possible applications for it (in the case of Shultz and Mattis) or because it represented a prime investment opportunity (in the case of Murdoch and DeVos).

 Do you think that Elizabeth Holmes is guilty?
Yes No
Completing this poll entitles you to Conservative Tribune news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
You’re logged in to Facebook. Click here to log out.
When it comes to the Clintons and Obama, however, things get a bit murkier.

It probably won’t surprise you, given that she helmed a Silicon Valley startup, that Holmes was a Clinton donor. Not only that, but Hillary Clinton had planned to host a fundraiser at Theranos until media attention forced her to host it elsewhere. (Even liberals were embarrassed.) The planned $2,700 a head event was to feature Chelsea Clinton, but apparently even the media couldn’t ignore the fact that she was hosting an event at a company that was under federal investigation.

“(The event) is not connected to a specific company or policy, but a chance to talk directly to women in tech,” Clinton’s campaign said at the time, according to the Washington Free Beacon. “We frequently send initial invitations while host committees are still being formed and locations finalized. This was never a health care event and the location wasn’t set. It will not be at Theranos.”

That was hardly the only contact that the Clintons had with her, however. When Bill Clinton interviewed Holmes in 2015 for his Clinton Global Initiative, an arm of the scandal-plagued Clinton Foundation, he noted that she started the company when she was only 19.

“Don’t worry about the future, we’re in good hands,” Clinton said. Holmes, for her part, talked about bringing “equality” to health care.

RELATED: Ridiculous Video Shows Results of Clinton Admin’s Prep for NK Meeting

President Obama went even further than the Clintons in embracing Holmes. In 2015, he invited the CEO to the White House, where he made her a Presidential Ambassador for Global Entrepreneurship. If you’re wondering what a Presidential Ambassador for Global Entrepreneurship does, it’s stuff like this PSA:

So, what’s the overarching point here? Why would the Clintons and the Obama administration get so involved with Holmes? We don’t necessarily impugn their judgment on her company’s viability, inasmuch as almost nobody knew it was a fraud.

On the other hand, they didn’t really seem to care whether it was or not. Hillary Clinton’s campaign wanted to hold a campaign event at Theranos well after it became clear, thanks to The Wall Street Journal’s reporting, that the company was suspected at least of some very shady things.

The fact was that Elizabeth Holmes was a Democrat’s dream.

Here was a young, millennial woman CEO saying all the right things about breaking the glass ceiling and instituting “equality “in health care. So what if her product was promising things that seemed impossible? So what if her company was under investigation? After all, she just brushed it off as the ossified medical establishment coming after her company. She was great copy.

And so, in a way deeper than Theranos’ investors or board members did, they co-signed Holmes’ reputation as the next Steve Jobs. The great thing for the Democrat mind was that the next Jobs came in a package that echoed all of their political prejudices. Or, in a kind of corruption of philosophy and politics that’s worse — and deeper — than financial misdealing, was it that she was the next Steve Jobs because she echoed all of their political preferences?

We’ll probably never know the answer to that chicken-or-egg question. We do know one thing for sure, however:

If only the Clintons and Obama had waited a little while, they’d have figured out they were dealing not with a Steve Jobs but instead a Kenneth Lay.

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers' newsfeeds and is instead promoting mainstream media sources. When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content. Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 52194
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

FBI didn’t pursue Hillary investigation because there were too many crimes

Post  Admin on Sun 17 Jun 2018, 4:42 pm

Report: FBI didn’t pursue Hillary investigation because there were too many crimes
https://www.patriotnewsalerts.com/report-fbi-didnt-pursue/?utm_medium=ci&utm_source=push&utm_campaign=pna
June 16, 2018
Report: FBI didn’t pursue Hillary investigation because there were too many crimes
Photo via Fox News Twitter Video Screenshot
When a law enforcement agency throws up its hands because there’s simply too much wrongdoing, you know there is something incredibly wrong with the justice system in this country.

But that is exactly what happened when the FBI failed to investigate staff members of Hillary Clinton’s State Department.

The Admission
The Justice Department inspector general report on the Clinton email investigation has as many shocking revelations as a Tom Clancy novel.

The report slams leadership in the FBI for being blatantly negligent and inadequate in its performance during the investigation.

It also makes it plainly clear that former FBI Director James Comey’s agency was operating under the pretense that Clinton was going to win — and all of this would have just been swept under the rug anyway.

But sandwiched in between all of that is the fact the FBI simply did not do its job.

The report openly admits specific devices were never checked because the FBI was afraid of how much information would be revealed and the vastness of the devices it would have to check.

The agency also came to the conclusion that all would be best served by the State Department conducting an internal investigation.

How Can That Be?
Let that sink in for a moment…

A massive FBI investigation was ordered, and rather than do their job, the agency decided to kick the investigation back to the agency that was being investigated.

This might be acceptable if there was just one person being investigated.

However, as the report states, the violations of policy were so vast that dozens of people in the agency more than likely violated protocol for the handling of classified documents.

This would be like coming home to three guilty-looking children and a broken window and asking them to investigate who broke it and get back to you with the answer.

Anyone challenging President Donald Trump’s statement that he has been completely vindicated in the firing both Comey and former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe after seeing that report has a serious case of the crazies.

Should Sessions or Congress Order a New Investigation Into Hillary Clinton?
Yes
No
Next
Not only was Trump vindicated in terminating them both, but charges should be filed against them.

In addition, that report leaves no doubt there needs to be a real investigation into the Hillary Clinton email scandal. The FBI clearly failed us on this one.

https://www.freespeechtime.net/2017/12/iran-stones-women-saudi-arabia-beheads.html
Iran stones women, Saudi Arabia beheads them but the UN condemns Israel - Oxford University declares war on the UN
Facebook 16.8k      
The incredible Anne Bayefsky speaking about the UN when it comes to their treatment of Israel! Watch her present at The Oxford Union. 
Is anyone in the UN listening? 
Every Western country must stand with Israel against radical Islamic terrorism. 
The Israeli people face the frighteningening escalation of Islamic terror acts through Israel. 
The world is silent when Palestinians influct pain and death upon Israel but screams when Israel protects itself.

 The U.N is a Failing Institution | Prof Anne Bayefsky | 7 of 8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=1&v=84OMOc04ZIE

Britain, the US and Australia should stop funding the UN. 
The U.N. General Assembly elected Qatar, Congo and Pakistan to its top human rights body, joining existing members such as Saudi Arabia, China, Cuba and Venezuela. 

Countries that practice Sharia laws have been chosen to be human rights watchdogs. 
Even a country like Iran has been given a seat in the UN Human Rights Council. 
Iran Where women are stoned to death, where gays are executed in a public square. 
Christians are brutally persecuted in the Islamic Republic of Iran. 
Pastors are jailed for no reason, no reason other than for being Christian leaders. Christians have been lashed for sipping wine during prayer services; Christians have been brutally tortured for doing nothing more than practicing their faith. 

Saudi Arabia is the head of the Human Rights Council, a country where there are no Christian citizens, even Christian migrant workers are persecuted by the authorities if they practice their religion. 
No religion is allowed to exist in Saudi Arabia except Islam, anyone who leaves Islam is executed.
Pakistan is the worst country for Christians to live in. 
Under sharia blasphemy law Muslims murder Christians on false charges of insulting the Prophet Muhammad and the Koran. 

These countries are kidnapping the UN bodies to push the anti-Israel and anti-Western agenda. 
They use the United Nations to attack Israel which is the only democratic state in the Middle East where Christians are free and women are not considered citizens in rank. 

In the last two years Benjamin Netanyahu cut 90% of Israeli aid to the UN after U.N.'s Cultural Agency passed a resolution denying the Jewish and Christian connection to Jerusalem. 
Western countries should follow Israel - Cut all funding & Announce Withdrawal From U.N.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 52194
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: If Hillary Goes Down So Will Obama

Post  Admin on Sat 16 Jun 2018, 12:34 pm

Court sets hearing on motion to force Hillary Clinton email testimony
https://www.patriotnewsalerts.com/court-hearing-hillary-email/?
June 14, 2018
Court sets hearing on motion to force Hillary Clinton email testimony
Image via K2 images / Shutterstock.com
Hillary Clinton is no doubt squirming in her chair after a judge handed down a decision in her email scandal case.

Judge Emmet G. Sullivan issued a ruling that on Oct. 11, Clinton will finally be compelled to answer questions about her email practices.

Don’t Remember, Don’t Recall
Hillary Clinton has constantly accused Donald Trump of lying to the American people.

Perhaps Clinton would like to look in a mirror before throwing out accusations such as that.

When Clinton was questioned about her email practices, she outright declined to answer three questions.

The current ruling is meant to rectify that situation.

But don’t get too excited.

During her prior testimony, Clinton stated she “does not recall” almost two dozen times.

Keep in mind, now, this is the woman the Dems ran out there for president.

Yet she doesn’t seem to be able to remember anything that happened on her watch.

Objection!
In addition to not recalling anything, Clinton was not at all happy with someone challenging the way she did things as secretary of State.

Clinton objected to eight questions asked of her, as well as objecting to two definitions given during her testimony.

In all, Clinton used variations of the word “objection” 84 times during her prior testimony.

One More Thing
Judicial Watch will have one more day in court, as Judge Sullivan has agreed to hear arguments regarding the testimony of John Bentel.

Bentel, as you may recall, was the Director of Information Resource Management for the State Department.

Do You Think Hillary Will Be Indicted?
Yes
No
He outright refused to answer 87 questions, invoking the Fifth Amendment, when he was called to testify.

Hillary and friends need to realize this scandal is not going away anytime soon, no matter how hard they try to keep the wool pulled over the eyes of American citizens.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 52194
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: If Hillary Goes Down So Will Obama

Post  Admin on Fri 15 Jun 2018, 5:45 pm

Court sets hearing on motion to force Hillary Clinton email testimony
https://www.patriotnewsalerts.com/court-hearing-hillary-email/?utm_medium=ci&utm_source=push&utm_campaign=pna
June 14, 2018
Court sets hearing on motion to force Hillary Clinton email testimony
Image via K2 images / Shutterstock.com
Hillary Clinton is no doubt squirming in her chair after a judge handed down a decision in her email scandal case.

Judge Emmet G. Sullivan issued a ruling that on Oct. 11, Clinton will finally be compelled to answer questions about her email practices.

Don’t Remember, Don’t Recall
Hillary Clinton has constantly accused Donald Trump of lying to the American people.

Perhaps Clinton would like to look in a mirror before throwing out accusations such as that.

When Clinton was questioned about her email practices, she outright declined to answer three questions.

The current ruling is meant to rectify that situation.

But don’t get too excited.

During her prior testimony, Clinton stated she “does not recall” almost two dozen times.

Keep in mind, now, this is the woman the Dems ran out there for president.

Yet she doesn’t seem to be able to remember anything that happened on her watch.

Objection!
In addition to not recalling anything, Clinton was not at all happy with someone challenging the way she did things as secretary of State.

Clinton objected to eight questions asked of her, as well as objecting to two definitions given during her testimony.

In all, Clinton used variations of the word “objection” 84 times during her prior testimony.

One More Thing
Judicial Watch will have one more day in court, as Judge Sullivan has agreed to hear arguments regarding the testimony of John Bentel.

Bentel, as you may recall, was the Director of Information Resource Management for the State Department.

Do You Think Hillary Will Be Indicted?
Yes
No
Next
He outright refused to answer 87 questions, invoking the Fifth Amendment, when he was called to testify.

Hillary and friends need to realize this scandal is not going away anytime soon, no matter how hard they try to keep the wool pulled over the eyes of American citizens.

The King James Version (KJV), also known as the King James Bible (KJB) or simply the Authorized Version (AV), is an English translation of the Christian Bible for the Church of England, begun in 1604 and completed in 1611.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 52194
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: If Hillary Goes Down So Will Obama

Post  Admin on Sun 10 Jun 2018, 10:25 pm

Democratic Party Accused of Illegally Funneling Millions of Dollars to Clinton Campaign
https://www.westernjournal.com/funneling-millions-clinton-campaign/?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=newsletter-WJ&utm_campaign=dailyam&utm_content=western-journal
By Jack Davis 
June 9, 2018 at 9:55am
 Share on Facebook Tweet Email Print
Up to 40 state Democratic Party operations may have colluded with the Clinton campaign in the most recent presidential election to attempt an end run around campaign finance laws, according to a new lawsuit.

As a result, up to $84 million may have been funneled to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign, Fox News reported.

Dan Backer, a campaign finance attorney, filed the lawsuit.

It claims that the actions were part of an “unprecedented nationwide scheme to violate federal campaign finance law in which $84 million was effectively laundered over more than a year by the Hillary Victory Fund through dozens of state political party committees to the Democratic National Committee and, ultimately, to Hillary for America,” according to a complaint filed with the Federal Elections Commission by the Committee to Defend the President.

“The money was papered to make it look like it passed through state committees,” Backer said, according to the Bangor Daily News. However, he said, state parties never really had the money.

TRENDING: Stormy Daniels Hit with Defamation Lawsuit After Criticizing Former Lawyer

“And that makes this entire money laundering operation a scheme to circumvent base contribution limits to make massively excessive six-figure contributions through straw entities on paper in order to deliver them to Hillary Clinton’s control,” he said. “It is exceedingly illegal to do have done so.”

“You had individuals giving $300,000,” Backer said Friday, according to the Las Vegas Review-Journal. “They’re not doing it because they care about Nevada’s or Arkansas’ state party. They’re doing it to curry favor with and buy influence with Hillary Clinton.”

The money was initially raised through the Hillary Victory Fund, which had an agreement to share funds with the states. However, Backer contends, the money never arrived.

He said the fund supposedly sent $1.7 million to the Nevada Democratic Party from December 2015 to November 2016. But Nevada only reported receiving $146,200. Backer claims the money that did not go to Nevada went to the Democratic National Committee.

Did the Clinton campaign violate federal campaign laws?
Yes No
 
Completing this poll entitles you to The Western Journal news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
The remaining $1.6 million was sent by the Hillary Victory Fund to the Nevada party and received by the DNC and never appeared on the Nevada party’s reports, Backer contends.

Backer’s lawsuit claims that in Idaho, the plan sent $1.6 million to Clinton’s campaign that should have gone to the state party. However, the complaint also notes that state parties may not have had a role in the plan because all the transfers were made by the Clinton campaign or DNC, according to The Idaho Statesman.

Delaware’s state Democratic Party took in $2.4 million from the Hillary Victory Fund, but then shipped almost all of that according to WXDE.

Backer said the paper trail shows this was an organized effort by those associated with the Clinton campaign to circumvent campaign finance rules.

“There were 11 transactions where the Democratic State Committee of Delaware (Delaware Democratic Party) forwarded $2.5 million to the Democratic National Committee, and so these funds were raised, transferred to the Delaware Democratic Party and then transferred to the DNC on the exact same day, or at least that’s what was reported,” he said. “For example, November 2, 2016, $59,000 was reported transferred from the Hillary Victory Fund to the State Committee, and then the Delaware State Committee reports receiving it and then reports sending it to the DNC who also reports receiving that exact same amount.”

RELATED: George Soros: ‘Everything That Could Go Wrong, Has Gone Wrong’

Backer said the scheme breaks the law because “the Supreme Court has said that we can impose a contribution limit on how much any one individual can give to any one candidate, state party, or political action committee. It doesn’t pass the sniff test. If I give you a million dollars for your campaign, I may not have bought anything, but it looks that way. The Supreme Court has widely upheld these base limits.”

State-level Democrats downplayed Backer’s claims.

“This is nothing more than a bogus political stunt feebly designed to distract from vulnerable Republicans’ disastrous agenda,” said Helen Kalla, a spokeswoman for the Nevada Democratic Party.

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers' newsfeeds and is instead promoting mainstream media sources. When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content. Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 52194
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: If Hillary Goes Down So Will Obama

Post  Admin on Fri 08 Jun 2018, 9:33 am

https://www.westernjournal.com/ct/more-than-maga/?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=conservative-brief-WJ&utm_campaign=dailypm&utm_content=western-journal
The Hat Hillary Regrets More Than ‘MAGA’
BY SPONSORED CONTENT 

JUNE 7, 2018 AT 12:09PM

 Share on Facebook  Tweet  Email  Print
The red “Make America Great Again” hat has been an icon of politics in the United States since the first formative days of the 2016 election. It was the wakeup call Americans wanted and needed after years of politicians selling our country short and losing at every turn.

But there is a phrase that likely did more to galvanize voters than “Make America Great Again” ever did. Hillary Clinton’s “deplorable” comment was reprehensible, and did more to separate the “elite” from everyday Americans than anything else in the 2016 election.

The quick-witted conservatives at Patriot Depot helped turn this insult into a badge of honor, something that can identify a patriotic and hard-working American citizen. If you don’t have one, you can pick it up here!



TRENDING: The Hat Hillary Regrets More Than ‘MAGA’

Thankfully, Clinton’s ambitions for the White House were crushed when the same deplorables she loved to insult stood together for America and elected Donald J. Trump.

So, what is a deplorable?

According to Hillary, the 75 million Americans who make up the “basket of deplorables” she referenced are racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic and Islamaphobic. These are hardworking Americans — dads, mothers, first responders, military personnel, teachers and many others  — that Hillary had no interest in meeting.

But we know better. We know that lifetime members of the Deplorables Club are easy to see. They’re the ones tirelessly working to help friends, family and their fellow Americans. Often times their jobs are thankless and underappreciated.

The paramedic who is working 18-hour ambulance shifts helping to save people regardless of race, religion, or creed? She’s a Deplorable.

The dad working two jobs to send his kids to a good college? He’s a Deplorable, too.

The soldier selflessly fighting to ensure our freedom? He’s also a Deplorable.

It’s no surprise this insult became a point of pride. Everyday Americans were sick and tired of being told how they and their loved ones posed a danger to our country, so they donned this hat and hit the polls.

Since then, the political and cultural landscape of America has shifted back to something close to normalcy thanks to the hard work of Deplorables all over the country.

Your lifetime membership in the Deplorables Club is simple. In fact, you’re probably already a member. Now all you need to do is grab your badge of pride: Get your “Deplorables Club — Lifetime Member” hat here!

This article was written by Jared Harris.

Sponsored content is a service paid for by an advertiser and produced by Liftable Media.

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers' newsfeeds and is instead promoting mainstream media sources. When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content. Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 52194
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: If Hillary Goes Down So Will Obama

Post  Admin on Sun 03 Jun 2018, 9:37 pm

Timely Flashback: Hillary Clinton Predicted Trump’s Tax Plan Would Kill 3.5 Million Jobs
https://www.westernjournal.com/ct/clinton-trumps-plan-kill-jobs/?utm_source=push&utm_medium=westernjournalism&utm_content=2018-06-02&utm_campaign=manualpost
BY BEN MARQUIS 
JUNE 2, 2018 AT 10:54AM

 Share on Facebook Tweet Email Print
The Bureau of Labor released their employment report for the month of May on Friday, and it contained some incredibly good economic news for the United States and American workers.

CNBC reported that the jobs report revealed a total of 223,000 nonfarm payroll jobs had been added over the past month, and the unemployment rate had dropped to 3.8 percent — the lowest since April 2000. These numbers beat estimates of only 188,000 new jobs and the unemployment rate holding steady at 3.9 percent.

Contrast that good news with the dire predictions offered up in 2016 by countless economic analysts and “experts,” who warned that Donald Trump’s tax, trade and regulatory policies would result in a horrendous economic downturn, potentially on par with the “Great Depression” of the 1930s.

More specifically, Townhall’s Guy Benson flashed back to the rather grim prediction by failed Democrat candidate Hillary Clinton during the third presidential debate of the 2016 election.

See her prediction of a dismal Trump economy around the 2:25 mark in the video below:

TRENDING: After Samantha Bee Attacks Ivanka, Chelsea Clinton Finds Way To Go After Donald



“By contrast, Donald’s plan has been analyzed to conclude it might lose 3.5 million jobs,” Clinton said.

“Why? Because his whole plan is to cut taxes, to give the biggest tax breaks ever to the wealthy and to corporations, adding $20 trillion to our debt, and causing the kind of dislocation that we have seen before, because it truly will be trickle-down economics on steroids,” she continued.

“So the plan I have I think will actually produce greater opportunities. The plan he has will cost us jobs and possibly lead to another Great Recession,” Clinton added.

Are you pleased with Donald Trump's work on the economy?
Yes No
Continue with Facebook
-- or --

Enter your email
 
Completing this poll entitles you to Conservative Tribune news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
But Benson pointed out that while Clinton predicted Trump’s economic policies would result in 3.5 million jobs lost, a recent projection by the Congressional Budget Office suggested that job creation would actually be about 2.6 million more than the initial projections issued in 2017.

Furthermore, a CNBC report in April revealed that more than 3 million new jobs had already been created in the U.S. economy since Trump took office, almost the complete opposite of what Clinton had predicted.

Meanwhile, the massive tax cuts Trump signed into law have had a positive effect on far more than just the wealthy and corporations — one need only ask the tens of thousands of workers who received “crumbs” in the form of large bonuses from the businesses that employ them, proving that the tax cuts did indeed “trickle down.”

On top of that, a report from The Washington Post noted that the recent jobs report fueled speculation among analysts that the unemployment rate will continue to fall throughout the rest of this year, potentially to an astonishingly low level of 3.5 percent, the lowest rate since 1969.

As new jobs are being added and unemployment numbers are dropping, wages are actually beginning to rise as well — something not seen in quite some time — at a rate of 2.7 percent over this time last year.

RELATED: Judge Jeanine ‘Stunned’ and ‘Confused’ by Trey Gowdy’s Trump Spy Statement

Additional proof that runs contrary to Clinton’s dystopian vision of Trump’s economy is the fact that the Atlanta Federal Reserve Bank just increased their projection of Gross Domestic Product growth rate for the second quarter of 2018 from 4.7 to 4.8 percent, a key economic metric that indicates the underlying strength of the U.S. economy.

All in all, the U.S. economy is booming, largely due to the fact that Trump kept his campaign promises of cutting taxes on corporations and individuals and rolling back regulations that stifled economic growth.

Like so many other things, Clinton was dead wrong in her predictions of what Trump’s economic policies would bring about, as more and more American workers are finding out each and every payday.

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers' newsfeeds and is instead promoting mainstream media sources. When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content. Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you.




Hillary posts angry rant about Trump’s immigration policy
https://www.patriotnewsalerts.com/hillary-posts-angry-rant/?utm_medium=ci&utm_source=push&utm_campaign=pna
June 2, 2018
Hillary posts angry rant about Trump’s immigration policy
Photo via Fox News Twitter Video Screenshot
Hillary Clinton has gone off the deep end…

Clinton proved that very fact with a recent Twitter rant blaming Trump for the problems with illegal immigration.

She Missed One Fact
Hillary ripped off a series of tweets over “immigrant” families being ripped apart due to policies of this administration.

The only problem, though, is that Hillary missed one small word repeatedly in her rants.

While she constantly called these people immigrants, she neglected to say they were undocumented immigrants.

In other words, Hillary was defending criminal acts by immigrants and blaming the results of those actions on President Trump and his administration.

Bill’s Immigration Policy
To appreciate the insanity of Hillary comments, we need look no further than her own husband’s administration.

During the 1995 State of the Union, Bill outlined a very aggressive plan to lock down our borders.

Then-President Clinton stated, “That’s why our administration has moved to aggressively secure our borders more, by hiring a record number of new border guards, by deporting twice as many criminal aliens as ever before, by cracking down on illegal hiring, by barring welfare to illegal aliens.”

That speech got a standing ovation from both sides of the aisle.

Hillary herself often campaigned touting Bill’s tough stance on immigration.

The Hypocrisy
Obama himself once gave a similar speech, then along came Trump.

When Trump started making border security a major part of his platform, Democrats made a huge pivot to protect undocumented immigrants.

Then, of course, the Dreamers program was put in place.

Do You Support Trump’s Immigration Policy?
Yes
No
Next
The fact is these people are breaking the law, period, and Democrats want to reward them for it.

Hillary need look no further than her former president and the parents of these children for who caused this problem, not Trump.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 52194
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: If Hillary Goes Down So Will Obama

Post  Admin on Wed 30 May 2018, 9:13 pm

DOJ Inspector Finishes Review of Hillary Probe, Expected To Be Released to Congress Soon
By Randy DeSoto 
May 29, 2018 at 1:43pm
 Share on Facebook Tweet Email Print
The Justice Department’s Office of Inspector General has completed its report on the FBI and DOJ’s handling of the Hillary Clinton investigation during the 2016 presidential campaign, and its release to Congress could come any day.

“The intelligence agencies have to clear some certain classified material to be released,” former Congressman Jason Chaffetz told Fox News on Sunday.

Chaffetz added that he anticipates Inspector General Michael Horowitz’s report will be nonpartisan.

“I expect him to be a fair arbiter of what’s going on there,” said the former chair of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee. “I think it will bring us as close to the truth as we’ll ever get.”

Fox News reported in mid-May Horowitz had completed his report.

TRENDING: ‘Terrible President:’ Former ACLU President Attacks Obama on Free Speech Issues

“We will update you on the specific timing for the report’s release, and I will be prepared to provide a briefing and testify publicly about our findings and conclusions as soon as the report is released,” Horowitz said at the time.

In April, Horowitz sent a criminal referral to the DOJ regarding former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, who allegedly lied to federal investigators about leaking details to the media in October 2016 regarding the bureau’s Clinton Foundation investigation.

House Republicans are looking deeper into the FBI’s handling of the Clinton email probe, scheduling interviews with three witnesses for June after a four-month hiatus without interviews.

The inquiry is being run jointly by the Judiciary and House Oversight and Government Affairs committees, The Hill reported.

Do you think Hillary Clinton is guilty of criminal wrongdoing in relation to her email server?
Yes No
Continue with Facebook
-- or --

Enter your email
 
Completing this poll entitles you to The Western Journal news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
The three witnesses include Bill Priestap, the assistant director of the FBI’s counterintelligence division; Michael Steinbach, the former head of the FBI’s national security division; and John Giacalone, who preceded Steinbach as the bureau’s top national security official.

Priestap is of particular interest because of his leadership position over the Clinton and Russia probes. Among those who served under him was counterintelligence agent Peter Strzok, who was reportedly on hand when the bureau interviewed both Clinton and Michael Flynn, President Donald Trump’s former national security adviser.

Multiple texts released by the Department of Justice inspector general between Strzok and his mistress, then-FBI attorney Lisa Page, showed extreme bias against then-candidate Trump.

Strzok described Trump during the 2016 campaign as a “loathsome human” and an “idiot,” and found the prospect of him being president “terrifying.”

Page texted him, “There is no way (Trump) gets elected.”

RELATED: Hillary Clinton: I’d Like To Be the CEO of Facebook

Strzok then replied, “I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy’s office … that there’s no way he gets elected — but I’m afraid we can’t take that risk. It’s like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you’re 40.”

In another exchange, Page wrote “Trump should go f himself,” to which Strzok replied, “F Trump.”

Additionally, House Republicans introduced a resolution earlier this month calling for the appointment a second special counsel to look into alleged abuses at the FBI and Justice Department regarding multiple issues, including their handling of the Clinton email scandal and the reported spying on the Trump presidential campaign.

The 12-page resolution offers a detailed account of the many areas the members would call on the special counsel to investigate.

The subjects range from the “premature” closing of the investigation into Clinton’s unauthorized, unsecured private email server during her time as secretary of state, to her destruction of materials subject to grand jury and congressional subpoenas, to former FBI Director James Comey’s letter exonerating Clinton drafted before he interviewed numerous key witnesses (including Clinton), to donations received by the Clinton Foundation in light of the Uranium One deal.

Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich told Fox News last week that wrongdoing by the Obama administration and Clinton are continuing to come to light.

 

Newt Gingrich
✔️
@newtgingrich
 The system of corruption that Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton were in charge of is beginning to unravel. The Inspector General's reports are just the beginning. More and more information will come out that will show how unimaginably corrupt the previous administration was.

11:32 PM - May 23, 2018
14.8K
7,621 people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy
“The system of corruption that Obama and Clinton were in charge of is gradually beginning to unravel,” Gingrich said.

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers' newsfeeds and is instead promoting mainstream media sources. When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content. Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 52194
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: If Hillary Goes Down So Will Obama

Post  Admin on Sun 27 May 2018, 10:56 pm

Hillary admits she would like to be CEO of Facebook
May 26, 2018
https://www.patriotnewsalerts.com/hillary-ceo-of-facebook/?utm_medium=ci&utm_source=push&utm_campaign=pna
Image via a katz / Shutterstock.com
Hillary will do or say anything right now to keep her name in the headlines.

Her latest utterance came during an appearance at Harvard, when Hillary said she would like to be the CEO of Facebook.

Can You Imagine…
What would a world be like with someone like Hillary controlling the flow of news to people?

Hillary had made it quite clear than unless you are telling news with a liberal twist, she considers it to be fake news.

When asked what company, if she had her choice, to be CEO, Hillary made no bones about going after one of the most powerful sites in the world today… Facebook.

“Facebook. It’s the biggest news platform in the world,” Clinton stated.

She continued, “Most people in our country get their news, true or not, from Facebook.”

Clinton then went on to compliment David Ignatius, an associate editor and writer for the Washington Post.

A quick look at recent articles by Ignatius and it is quite apparent he has an agenda against not only President Trump, but conservative beliefs in general.

Conservatives Would Have No Voice
Clinton also went out of her way to slam several news sites by hinting they are manipulating the news.

Of course, the two she singled out were Fox News and Sinclair.

Clinton would much prefer the likes of CNN and MSNBC, where every bit of news gets twisted to push a liberal agenda.

Now imagine her in charge of a social media platform that has already put restrictions on conservative news.

If Clinton were in charge of Facebook, the entire country can rest assured the ONLY news that would get through would be news that shows liberal news in a positive light.

Would You Use Facebook if Hillary Was CEO?
Yes
No
Next
The bottom line here is Hillary Clinton continues to try to pull the wool over everyone’s eyes as some great savior for the rule of law and the truth.

This from a woman that has spent her entire political career threatening whistleblowers, hiding the truth, and breaking the law.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 52194
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: If Hillary Goes Down So Will Obama

Post  Admin on Sun 27 May 2018, 10:38 pm

Hillary Clinton covers up with heavy coat and scarf despite soaring temperatures
May 26, 2018
https://www.conservativeinstitute.org/conservative-news/hillary-clinton-heavy-coat.htm?utm_source=aimtell&utm_campaign=automated_push&utm_medium=push
Hillary Clinton covers up with heavy coat and scarf despite soaring temperatures
Gregory Reed / Shutterstock.com
New photos are raising more questions about Hillary Clinton’s health.

On Friday, Clinton was spotted wearing a heavy coat and a scarf in nearly 90-degree weather. What’s more, this wasn’t even the first time she’s been seen in this unseasonable outfit,  causing many to wonder just what the former secretary of state is hiding under all that clothing.

Clinton’s strange wardrobe
The newest photos came from Clinton’s recent visit to Harvard where she received the Radcliffe Award for her “transformative impact on society.” According to weather reports, temperatures in Boston, Massachusetts, reached nearly 90 degrees on Friday. But that didn’t stop her from wearing this covered up number:

View image on Twitter

Maura Healey
✔️
@maura_healey
 WATCH LIVE NOW - Maura's special conversation with @HillaryClinton at @RadInstitute #RadDay18. bit.ly 2s7nx6V  #MaPoli

5:58 PM - May 25, 2018
824
381 people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy

Lest anyone think that Clinton simply misjudged the weather, she has been seen wearing a nearly identical outfit on a number of recent occasions, including towards the end of April when she visited her daughter Chelsea in 80-degree New York weather.

What is Hillary hiding?
The obvious explanation would seem to be that Clinton has been trying to cover something up. But what?

As curiosity grew, perceptive individuals began to notice other oddities: that Clinton’s posture has been unnaturally erect, both when standing and sitting; that there seems to be some kind of protrusion coming from her back; and that she often wears a scarf strategically draped down her back, over whatever is jutting out.

Some believe that all signs point to a back brace, but there has been no confirmation of this.

Do you think Hillary is covering something up?
Yes
No
Next
Hillary’s health history
If Clinton is having trouble with her back, this would be the latest in what seems to be an ever-growing list of health issues.

Towards the end of 2017, the 70-year-old was seen wearing a surgical boot for months after falling down stairs and breaking her toe. Then, in early 2018, Clinton had to wear a cast, which she also tried to keep hidden, after slipping in a hotel bathroom and breaking her wrist.

In fact, staying on her feet has been a persistent problem for Clinton. Readers will likely recall the incident that occurred in 2016 when she collapsed while visiting the 9/11 memorial site. Subsequently, excuses ranged from a loss of balance to pneumonia.

In recent years, Clinton has also suffered from head injuries, blood clots, and violent coughing attacks.

Clinton has done her best to keep all of these problems hidden, presumably to maintain a strong appearance before her supporters. But this growing list of ailments suggests that Clinton’s health is becoming more and more fragile, making future political bids unlikely
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 52194
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: If Hillary Goes Down So Will Obama

Post  Admin on Fri 25 May 2018, 4:23 pm

PROOF! 'NO FIREWALL' BETWEEN HILLARY'S STATE, FOUNDATION
http://www.wnd.com/2018/05/proof-no-firewall-between-hillarys-state-foundation/
Feds confirm discovery of 'thousands' of connections while Clinton was in office
Published: 14 hours ago
Hillary Clinton (Photo: Twitter)

The Washington-watching American Center for Law and Justice has confirmed it will be getting “thousands” of documents connecting the State Department and the Clinton Foundation during the time that Hillary Clinton was secretary of State for Barack Obama.

“We have just uncovered a stunning revelation about the extent to which the Clinton State Department colluded with the Clinton Foundation,” the organization confirmed this week.

“Despite what Hillary Clinton told the American people, there was no firewall.”

The organization long has been pursuing a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit against the “Deep State Department” over details of Hillary Clinton’s tenure.

It was during that time she set up and ran a private email server that was unsecured for classified national secrets.

It was during that time Benghazi happened, and more.

Now the ACLJ has revealed it has learned the State Department as found “and will be forced to turn over to the ACLJ – literally thousands of documents to and about the Clinton Foundation, its subsidiaries, and its senior operatives.”

The latest documents to have been released, more than 330 pages, have been posted online.

The ACLJ reported that the volume of information that has been discovered, some 30,000 emails alone, “debunks the specious assertion that there was any kind of firewall whatsoever between Clinton’s State Department and the Clinton Foundation.”

Instead, they show “extensive communications exchanged between Clinton or her senior staff at State Department and Doug Band – a senior aide at the Clinton Foundation and creator of the Clinton Global Initiative (CGI).”

The problem is that as a senior official in the Obama administration, Hillary Clinton should not have been favoring her own family foundation with even information.

“In recent court filings, the State Department has revealed that more than 8,700 documents exist in Cheryl Mills’ and/or Huma Abedin’s files which contain the single search term, ‘Doug Band.’ It is possible, and indeed likely, that each document consists of several pages placing the number closer to 18,000 pages or more,” the ACLJ speculated.

Mills and Abedin were top aides for Hillary Clinton.

And, the ACLJ said, it also has learned another 22,000 documents exist in Cheryl Mills’ and Huma Abedin’s files (not including attachments) mentioning or referring to the Clinton Foundation or a related term referencing the foundation.

Find Out More >
55,336
The result is “overwhelming evidence of the corruption that occurred within the State Department during the time Hillary Clinton served as secretary of State.”

And they show she “intentionally lied” to America and misled the Senate Foreign Relations Committee during her confirmation hearings, the report said.

After all, that was when she promised “complete separation” between the interests of State and the benefits for her foundation.

The reality was, however, the ACLJ said, that “Band served as a liaison for Clinton donors looking for favors and official acts from the Clinton-run State Department.”

The evidence shows that if a foundation donor “needed help with a visa application in light of a prior criminal conviction or experienced complications with international travel, they contacted Doug Band and, within minutes of receiving their request, Doug Band would forward the request/favor to Huma Abedin or Cheryl Mills.”

Sometimes, even government employees looking for Clinton contacted Band for a response, the report says.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 52194
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: If Hillary Goes Down So Will Obama

Post  Admin on Tue 22 May 2018, 11:40 pm

Hillary campaign paid her own company $150,000
https://www.patriotnewsalerts.com/hillary-paid-her-own-company-150000/?utm_medium=ci&utm_source=push&utm_campaign=pna
May 21, 2018
Hillary campaign paid her own company $150,000
Image via aphrodite-in-nyc / CCL
Hillary just got caught with her hand in the cookie jar… again.

A new report has surfaced, showing Hillary Clinton funneling campaign cash to one of her Delaware-based LLC’s.

Leopards Don’t Change Their Spots
There is little doubt among conservatives that Hillary Clinton is a con artist.

She schemed her way through the political world on the coattails of her husband.

She did nothing while serving in New York other than having a street renamed, yet somehow catapulted herself into the presidential picture.

After getting crushed by Obama, she was handed a state department job to make her happy.

She took advantage of that position by garnering six-figure speaking fees for Bill and working a pay-to-play scheme for an audience with the president.

All the while, her family was in charge of a foundation that pays most of its donations out in salaries!

So, is anyone really surprised she is now linked to some pretty shady accounting practices involving leftover campaign funds?

The Scam
Since last May, ZFS Holdings LLC has received about $150,000 from the Clinton campaign.

Payment amounts have ranged from almost $10,000 to just under $33,000.

Now, this is where it gets interesting.

Hillary’s people are claiming the money being paid was for rent during the presidential campaign.

However, there were no rent payments made during the entire election to this company for this purpose.

The more likely scenario is Hillary is skimming a little cash off the top to dip her dirty little paws into leftover funds.

Campaign laws state leftover funds can be kept in a war chest for an upcoming campaign, to pay off campaign debt, or donated to charity.

None of these appear to be the case with these payments.

A DC attorney, Cleta Mitchell, stated, “So the question is whether this is really for rent of whether the payments are to this entity for other types of work for Hillary, which would be personal use if it is isn’t specifically tied to the winding down of the campaign.”

Do You Think Hillary Broke the Law?
Yes
No
Next
Since personal use is against the law, Hillary has some serious questions to answer and she better be able to back up those answers with proof.

And the sooner the better, because we all know how good Hillary and company are at covering their tracks!
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 52194
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: If Hillary Goes Down So Will Obama

Post  Admin on Mon 14 May 2018, 8:49 pm

https://www.patriotnewsalerts.com/hillary-clinton-slammed-trumps/?utm_medium=ci&utm_source=push&utm_campaign=pna
Hillary Clinton slammed Trump’s North Korea approach as “not useful” just months ago
May 13, 2018
Hillary Clinton slammed Trump’s North Korea approach as “not useful” just months ago
Photo Courtesy of Karen Murphy via Creative Commons License (flickr)
Hillary Clinton is rarely right about anything. In fact, she’s made being comically wrong almost an art form.


She’s the Picasso of poor predictions, the Mozart of missing the boat, the Da Vinci of dumb decision making. You get the point.


So it shouldn’t surprise anyone that she was dead wrong about Trump’s strategy on North Korea. 


Oops…
It happened on The View, a show that is usually so idiotic that it takes a special brand of crazy to stand out.


Hillary delivered.


When asked by Joy Behar about President Trump’s alleged “saber-rattling” towards North Korea, Hillary went on the record:


“North Korea, this is a very serious issue. What I’m most critical of is that you cannot deal with North Korea unless you deal with our allies.”


She added:


“It doesn’t help for the President on Twitter to insult South Korea. It is not useful in our trying to bring people together to deal with what is a very serious threat to our own national security.”


Not useful, she says.


Watch here (Hillary starts talking about North Korea at 2:22):




Come again?
Trump’s approach wasn’t “useful” in “bringing people together?” Really?


Just a few months later, North Korea has promised to destroy its nuclear arsenal in full view of foreign journalists.


They’ve promised to meet with President Trump at a summit conference to discuss the future.


They released American prisoners they held for years.


And they declared an end to the decades-long war with South Korea.


Seems like Trump’s approach was rather productive. It seems like he knows what he’s doing after all.


Is Hillary the most incompetent politician since Jimmy Carter?
Yes
No
Next
That’s more than you can say for Hillary. Even for her, this is embarrassing.


If she had a legacy to destroy, this would do it. Thank God she’s not in charge of anything.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 52194
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: If Hillary Goes Down So Will Obama

Post  Admin on Wed 09 May 2018, 8:47 pm

Newly revealed memo shows Hillary server was ‘lost’ by FBI
https://www.patriotnewsalerts.com/newly-revealed-memo-shows-hillary-server-was-lost-by-fbi/?utm_medium=ci&utm_source=push&utm_campaign=pna 
May 8, 2018
Newly revealed memo shows Hillary server was ‘lost’ by FBI
Image via Evan El-Amin / Shutterstock.com
We are all pretty sure the Hillary Clinton email/server investigation was botched by the FBI, but I doubt anyone really expected this.

Buried deep in FBI records recently released is proof the FBI actually lost the “chain of custody” trail for Hillary’s servers…

View image on Twitter
View image on Twitter

WikiLeaks
✔️
@wikileaks
 New FOIA docs show that FBI lost chain of custody for five weeks of Hillary Clinton's server. Say they lost the chain entirely and created a new one. https://vault.fbi.gov/hillary-r.-clinton/Hillary%20R.%20Clinton%20Part%2021%20of%2021/view

9:14 PM - May 5, 2018
5,105
5,030 people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy
Not a Big Deal, Right?
If you read the language in the report, it makes it sound like this is no big deal.

That could not be further from the truth, though.

The chain of custody for evidence is one of the single most important factors when handling evidence in any criminal case.

In essence, the FBI is admitting that someone could have gotten their hands on the server for nefarious purposes at some point.

In all, there were five weeks unaccounted for.

In this day and age, someone with the right skillset would need only hours, if not minutes, to change or delete records on the server.

What this essentially means in that server, for all intents and purposes, can never be used as evidence against Hillary because anything could have happened to it during the time where it “disappeared.”

Was this convenient loss of custody ordered by Obama, Lynch, or even one of the Clintons to their lackeys in the FBI?

Would anyone really be surprised if that is what actually happened? We think not!

What Now Comey?
This does not bode well for Comey, or McCabe for that matter.

Americans have already lost the trust of the agency, and this is only going to make things worse.

We already know Comey was drafting a letter to exonerate Hillary months before the investigation was over.

Could it be that Comey knew about this problem and did not tell anyone?
Yes
No
Next
Did he let her off the hook for fear of having gross negligence in the handling of the evidence exposed?

All this document did was create more questions for Comey and McCabe as well as some significant problems for both of them.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 52194
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: If Hillary Goes Down So Will Obama

Post  Admin on Wed 09 May 2018, 4:10 pm

Photo of Hillary Clinton shows something protruding from her back
https://www.patriotnewsalerts.com/photo-of-hillary-clinton/?utm_medium=ci&utm_source=push&utm_campaign=pna
May 8, 2018
Photo of Hillary Clinton shows something protruding from her back
Photo Courtesy of Karen Murphy via Creative Commons License (flickr)
Something is oddly wrong with Hillary these days, and it did not take very long for people to pick up on it.

During a recent outing, a large protrusion from Hillary’s back was noticed, with amateur sleuths speculating she may now be wearing some sort of back brace…

View image on Twitter

deplorable susie
@gs777gs777
 Hillary Clinton - bullet-proof vest or back brace ?

7:14 AM - May 4, 2018
53
58 people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy
With the weather being what it was, everyone is very much right to wonder why Hillary was so bundled up and exactly what that protrusion on her back really was.

There are really only two options here:

Option 1: Back Brace
With all the medical problems Hillary has been having, the speculation that she is wearing some type of back brace is very real.

She has recently been seen wearing a cast on her wrist, so there is a very good chance she took another bad fall.

If that happened, it is not out of the realm that she hurt her back in the process.

Of course, we will never know if this is the case because Hillary doesn’t want anyone to know about her health.

Option 2: Bullet Proof Vest
Today’s political climate has made public appearances very dangerous for any political figure.

The random shooting during the congressional softball game is proof of that.

And let’s face facts, Hillary has not exactly endeared herself to very many people.

It is not exactly reaching to say someone might want to take a shot at her.

Bullet Proof Vest or Back Brace?
Yes
No
Next
From what we can tell, though, it would appear that option one is the more likely case here.

During yet another recent appearance, Hillary was sitting noticeably upright, so the lean here is that she is wearing some type of brace for a back problem.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 52194
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: If Hillary Goes Down So Will Obama

Post  Admin on Sun 06 May 2018, 5:52 pm

DOJ inspector postpones testimony after new Hillary email case leads found
https://www.patriotnewsalerts.com/doj-inspector-postpones-testimony/?utm_medium=ci&utm_source=push&utm_campaign=pna
May 5, 2018
DOJ inspector postpones testimony after new Hillary email case leads found
Image via K2 images / Shutterstock.com
There is just a little more hope that we may finally get some justice against Hillary Clinton.

Inspector General Michael Horowitz’s testimony before the House Oversight Committee has been delayed, so he can have more time to review new evidence in regard to the Hillary email investigation.

Bad News for Hillary
For what seems like years, the House Oversight Committee had been requesting information from the FBI related to Hillary’s email case.

Within the last couple of weeks, the committee was finally able to secure the release of the information it needed to fully investigate the case.

Now that the Inspector General has his hands on the information, the committee wants a report to find out exactly how Comey came to let Hillary off the hook.

While his original testimony date was scheduled for May 8, he will now look to testify as soon as he finishes his report on the case.

On the delay, Rep. Gowdy stated, “It is of the utmost importance that your review be fulsome, complete, and unimpeded as possible.”

Delay Should Not Be Long
According to reports, even though his testimony is being delayed, it should not be a significant delay.

Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, who has been facing considerable heat from the Trump administration over the raid of Cohen’s hotel room and office, seems very optimistic the report will present the Justice Department with a learning opportunity.

Rosenstein stated, “Within the next few weeks, I anticipate our inspector general will complete a comprehensive, fair, and nonpartisan report that answers many questions about how the Department of Justice handled a high-profile investigation during the last presidential campaign.”

“We will learn from it, and our Department will do better in the future,” Rosenstein added.

Now, that does not exactly sound like someone that is confident the investigation was actually handled properly.

That little tidbit is not good news for Comey, McCabe, or Hillary.

Comey had managed to dodge the bullet thus far, but this report could change that.

And McCabe, well, he is already hanging on by a thread.

Hillary should also be walking on egg shells right now.

If Horowitz finds a blatant mishandling of the case, there is a very good chance a new investigation will be opened up into the email scandal.

Without Obama putting pressure on the Justice Department, it is unlikely Hillary will like the outcome the second time around.

Do You Think the Hillary Email Investigation Was Handled Properly?
Yes
No
Next
If this report comes out the way we think it will come out, McCabe could be getting fitted for an orange jumper sooner rather than later.

And, with any luck, Hillary won’t be far behind him.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 52194
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: If Hillary Goes Down So Will Obama

Post  Admin on Thu 26 Apr 2018, 6:22 pm

https://www.conservativeinstitute.org/conservative-news/hillary-clinton-unleashed-staffers.htm?utm_source=aimtell&utm_campaign=automated_push&utm_medium=push
Report: Hillary Clinton ‘unleashed’ on staffers before debates with expletive-ridden rants
April 25, 2018
Report: Hillary Clinton ‘unleashed’ on staffers before debates with expletive-ridden rants
Image Source: Screenshot
A new book about the 2016 presidential campaign season is revealing the truth about the former secretary of State — and it isn’t pretty.

The book, Chasing Hillary: Ten Years, Two Presidential Campaigns and One Intact Glass Ceiling, was written by Amy Chozick, a New York Times journalist who covered Hillary Clinton during the campaign. According to Chozick, Clinton unleashed on her staff in a foul-mouthed rant during a debate prep session in 2016, when she reportedly ranted about her struggles with appearing “authentic” to voters and laced into Donald Trump, who she called “disgusting” in between f-bombs.

“You want authentic, here it is!” Clinton reportedly yelled, before melting down into what Chozick called a “f***-laced fusillade about what a ‘disgusting’ human being Trump was and how he didn’t deserve to even be in the arena.”

Hillary: Unleashed
According to Chozick’s book, Clinton’s staff knew that their boss sometimes needed to lash out on them before a debate to calm down. According to Chozick, “Aides understood that in order to keep it all together onstage, Hillary sometimes needed to unleash on them in private.”

But the book doesn’t stop there: Chozick also chronicles Clinton’s efforts to beat her own inauthentic image. According to Chozick, Clinton would reportedly rehearse empathetic body language to appear more relatable to debate questioners.

“Hillary would take a couple of steps toward the questioner, make eye contact, empathize,” Chozick wrote.

According to The Guardian, Chozick even dedicates three pages to discussing the campaign’s struggle to settle on an authentic-sounding slogan. The campaign considered some 84 slogans that they discarded, including, “You’ve earned a fair chance,” and, “No quit.”

The campaign also reportedly struggled with handling then-candidate Trump’s attacks on his adversary over the rape allegations against her husband. Chozick wrote that Clinton “erupted” when she reported in January 2016 that Clinton supporter and entertainer Lena Dunham was disturbed “by how, in the 1990s, the Clintons and their allies discredited women” who had accused Clinton of assault.

Are you glad that this book is revealing the truth about Hillary Clinton?
Yes
No
Next
Deplorables comments “always got a laugh”
Chozick spends most of her book recounting some of the most disturbing parts of the Clinton campaign, many of which were previously unknown to the public. According to the journalist, Clinton often joked about “deplorables” with friends in private, and her wisecracks were a big hit at parties in the Hamptons and Martha’s Vineyard.

“The Deplorables always got a laugh, over living-room chats in the Hamptons, at dinner parties under the stars on Martha’s Vineyard, over passed hors d’oeuvres in Beverly Hills, and during sunset cocktails in Silicon Valley,” Chozick wrote.

This allegation makes it clear that Clinton’s infamous “basket of deplorables” comment was not a one-off remark, but rather, part of an ironic classification of Trump voters. Clinton broke Trump supporters down into “three baskets,” writes Chozick: Republican loyalists, the economically depressed, and bigots.

Chozick further described these “baskets” in Clinton’s terms:

Basket #1: The Republicans who hated her and would vote Republican no matter who the nominee.

Basket #2: Voters whose jobs and livelihoods had disappeared, or as Hillary said, “who feel that the government has let them down, the economy has let them down, nobody cares about them, nobody worries about what happens in their lives and their futures.”

Basket #3: The Deplorables. This basket includes “the racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamophobic—you name it.”

“I really messed up,’ [Clinton] told aides that night,” Chozick wrote of the evening after Clinton’s “Deplorables” comment went public. Clinton even reportedly told a friend at one point, “Oh what’s the point? They’re never going to like me.”

But what the former secretary of State fails to realize is that it was more than just her comments that made her an unfavorable candidate. Clinton once said during a debate with Trump that she had a “public and a private position” on Wall Street. Now, it looks like that personality split runs deeper than we thought.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 52194
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: If Hillary Goes Down So Will Obama

Post  Admin on Sun 22 Apr 2018, 10:30 pm

Hillary told campaign staff she was ‘getting pretty tired’ of hearing about how no one likes her
https://www.patriotnewsalerts.com/nobody-likes-hillary/?utm_medium=ci&utm_source=push&utm_campaign=pna
April 21, 2018
Hillary told campaign staff she was ‘getting pretty tired’ of hearing about how no one likes her
Image via a katz / Shutterstock.com
One of the main reasons Hillary was not elected president was simply because people did not like her… and she knew it.
 
In a new book revealing inside details of the Clinton presidential campaigns, author Amy Chozick stated, “You know, I [Hillary] am getting pretty tired of hearing about how nobody likes me.”
 
The Tell All
Amy Chozick had the not so desirable duty of trailing Hillary Clinton during both of her failed presidential bids.
 
During that time, she was privy to some rather interesting behind-the-scenes conversations that took place between Hillary and her staffers.
 
Her new book, Chasing Hillary: Ten Years, Two Presidential Campaigns, and One Intact Glass Ceiling, she reveals some of those moments to the public.
 
The fact that Hillary was not well-liked by Americans was a point that was seemingly made time and time again by Hillary staffers.
 
You did not have to be present when Hillary made that statement to hear the frustration in her voice.
 
And, it was not apparent then, it surely was in her follow up comment.
 
Clinton said to no one in particular, “Oh, what’s the point? They’re never going to like me.”
 
Can’t Change People’s Minds
Even though Hillary knew people did not like her, she seemed content to just let it lie.
 
She had conceded there was nothing she would ever be able to do that could win over voters that did not already think favorably of her.
 
That same sentiment seemed to run through her campaign officers as well.
 
Podesta was quoted as saying, “I remember no one trusted Bill Clinton, and he won twice.”
 
As it would turn out, it was a colossal mistake on the part of her campaign to not work on her image more.
 
Do You Think Hillary’s ‘Unlikability’ Cost Her the Election?
Yes
No
Next
While Trump gradually won more people over and obviously won the election because of it, Hillary just continued to spin her wheels.
 
Her hubris got in the way of reality, thankfully, for all of us.



Report: Obama DOJ tried to end Clinton Foundation investigation – because of 2016 election
https://www.patriotnewsalerts.com/doj-end-clinton-investigation/?utm_medium=ci&utm_source=push&utm_campaign=pna
April 21, 2018
Report: Obama DOJ tried to end Clinton Foundation investigation – because of 2016 election
Image via Drop of Light / Shutterstock.com
Details within the Inspector General’s report on McCabe are going to take down more than the beleaguered former Deputy Director of the FBI.

Further details have revealed someone deep inside the Obama administration may have ordered the shut down of the investigation into the illegal activities of the Clinton Foundation.

The Proof
Liberals are already trying to call this conspiracy theory, but it is far from it.

The root of these accusations is there for everyone to see in the Inspector General’s report about the “lack of candor” by Andrew McCabe.

Within this report, McCabe gives details about being put under pressure by the Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General (PADAG) to drop the Clinton Foundation investigation.

Since that investigation was taking place during the presidential election, and Obama was obviously trying to protect his legacy, it makes perfect sense the administration wanted this to just “go away.”

The DOJ report stated, “According to McCabe, he pushed back, asking ‘are you telling me that I need to shut down a validly predicated investigation?’ McCabe told us that the conversation was ‘very dramatic’ and he never had a similar confrontation like the PADAG call with a high-level Department official in his entire FBI career.”

Every piece of documentation has been gone over by several legal experts, and they all came to the same conclusion:

Someone very high in the Justice Department had ordered the end to the Clinton Foundation investigation.

One legal expert, J. Christian Adams, who has experience operating in the Department of Justice Civil Rights Division, asked, “What kind of Justice Department do we have, that a couple weeks before the election, the presidential political appointees are calling the No. 2 guy at the FBI, essentially saying, give Hillary a pass?”

He emphasized, “That’s in the OIG report! That’s the real bombshell!”

Questions Need to be Answered
There are obviously a lot of questions that now need to be answered by the likes of Loretta Lynch and Barack Obama.

These are not questions they can just dismiss as right-wing rhetoric, either, but you know that is exactly what they will try to do.

Do You Think Obama Ordered This Investigation To Be Shut Down?
Yes
No
Next
This is a major scandal where someone must be held accountable.

Not only that, but an immediate and full investigation into the activities of the Clinton Foundation must be conducted, because it is quite apparent that did not happen the first time around.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 52194
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: If Hillary Goes Down So Will Obama

Post  Admin on Tue 17 Apr 2018, 10:06 pm

Bombshell: FBI covered up scandal involving both Hillary and Obama at the same time
January 22, 2018
https://www.conservativeinstitute.org/government-corruption/hillary-obama-scandal-fbi.htm?
Bombshell: FBI covered up scandal involving both Hillary and Obama at the same time
Marc Nozell / CCL
The Justice Department released a fresh batch of texts exchanged between top FBI agent Peter Strzok and FBI lawyer Lisa Page to Congress last week.

One of those messages mentions a notable omission in James Comey’s statement closing out the Clinton email probe. An earlier draft referred to emails exchanged between Clinton and former president Obama while Clinton was “on the territory of a hostile adversary,” but the reference to Obama was later changed to “senior government official,” and ultimately was omitted entirely.

It was revealed late last year that the language in Comey’s statement had been changed significantly from “grossly negligent” to “extremely careless” to exonerate Clinton of any wrongdoing. Comey’s original statement also said that it was “reasonably likely” that hostile hackers were able to access Clinton’s unsecured server, but was changed to “possible” in the final version.

FBI covered up Obama-Clinton exchange
The Justice Department provided 384 pages of texts to Congress on Friday. The newly released messages, dating from the spring and summer of 2016, mostly deal with the Clinton email probe.

Strzok, who worked on the Trump-Russia investigation before his dismissal over alleged anti-Trump bias, also worked on the Clinton email investigation.

One message mentions changes in Comey’s statement closing out the Clinton email probe. Earlier draft language mentioned that Clinton used her private server to email Obama while Clinton was “on the territory” of a hostile adversary. The reference to Obama was at first changed and then erased altogether.

The AP reports:

One of the messages references a change in language to Comey’s statement closing out the email case involving Clinton, Trump’s Democratic opponent in the 2016 presidential election.

While an earlier draft of the statement said Clinton and President Barack Obama had an email exchange while Clinton was “on the territory” of a hostile adversary, the reference to Obama was at first changed to “senior government official” and then omitted entirely in the final version.

This looks more than a little suspicious.

Five months of texts vanish
The FBI told Congress its system had failed to preserve five months of texts, ranging from Dec. 14, 2016, to May 17, 2017, the day Mueller was appointed to lead the investigation. The FBI blamed the vanished texts on “misconfiguration issues related to rollouts, provisioning, and software upgrades that conflicted with the FBI’s collection capabilities.”

But wait – there’s more.

Others texts suggest that Strzok and Page knew the outcome of the Clinton email probe before it was over. The two bemoaned the ill-timing of former Attorney General Loretta Lynch’s announcement that she would defer to the FBI’s conclusion on the case, which came just days after a meeting between Lynch and Bill Clinton aboard her plane in Phoenix.

“Timing looks like hell,” Strzok texted Page on July 1, 2016.

“Yeah, that is awful timing,” Page said, adding, “It’s a real profile in couragw [sic], since she knows no charges will be brought.”

Comey announced on July 5, 2016, that no charges would be brought against Clinton.

Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), chairman of the Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee, sent a letter to FBI Director Christopher Wray on Sunday asking for an explanation for the missing texts.

Meanwhile, Republicans have seized upon the texts, including the missing ones, to step up calls for a second, independent special counsel to investigate the FBI’s handling of the email probe. While Democrats describe Republicans’ criticism as an attempt to smear the FBI, it is getting harder to not connect the dots.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 52194
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: If Hillary Goes Down So Will Obama

Post  Admin on Fri 13 Apr 2018, 11:19 am

Judicial Watch sues State, Justice Departments for Uranium One documents
April 11, 2018
https://www.conservativeinstitute.org/political-corruption/foia-lawsuit-uranium-one.htm?Judicial Watch sues State, Justice Departments for Uranium One documents
JStone / Shutterstock.com
Hillary Clinton probably wants everyone to forget about the shadowy Uranium One deal she signed off on under the Barack Obama administration, but one watchdog group has other plans.

Judicial Watch announced on Tuesday that it filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the Justice and State Departments for all records pertaining to the Uranium One deal. The suit comes after the agencies failed to comply with previous record requests in December.

Judicial Watch sues for Uranium One docs
The watchdog group filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) suit in Washington on March 29. The lawsuit comes after the two agencies did not respond to a pair of similar requests on Dec. 22, 2017.

According to the press release, Judicial Watch asked the Justice Department for “all records regarding the company Uranium One (otherwise known as Uranium One, Inc. or SXR Uranium One, Inc.), including records of communication sent to and from officials in the offices of the Attorney General and Deputy Attorney General, Office of Legal Counsel, and the National Security Division from January 20, 2009 through December 31, 2013.”

Meanwhile, the State Department was asked to produce:

Any records relating to the company Uranium One (otherwise known as Uranium One, Inc. or SXR Uranium One, Inc.), including records of communication sent to and from officials in the Office of the Secretary of State, Office of the Legal Advisor, Office of the Under Secretary for Arms Control and International Security Affairs, Office of Arms Control, Verification and Compliance, Office of International Security and Nonproliferation, and the Office of Political-Military Affairs from January 20, 2009 through December 31, 2013.

The president of Judicial Watch was hopeful that the suits would bring the “Uranium One cover-up” to an end.

“It is simply remarkable that Judicial Watch had to sue the State and Justice Departments in federal court for basic information about the shady Uranium One deal,” Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said. He added:

It seems Judicial Watch has done more to investigate the Clinton-Russia connections than the Justice Department, even as DOJ resources are spent on supporting Mueller’s massive investigation into the fanciful Clinton Dossier-inspired [Donald] Trump-Russia conspiracy theory. We hope the Uranium One cover-up ends thanks to these lawsuits.

Should Hillary Clinton be held accountable for her crimes?
Yes
No
Next
Conflicts of interest
Judicial Watch is currently investigating the controversial 2010 Uranium One deal that Clinton signed off on, along with other eight other officials who sat on the Committee on Foreign Investments in the United States (CFIUS), which must approve business deals that carry implications for American national security.

The national security risk in this case stemmed from the fact that Russia’s state-owned nuclear company, Rosatom, was looking to buy Canadian mining company Uranium One, which controlled 20 percent of America’s uranium.

Conflicts of interest cropped up when it was revealed that entities connected to Uranium One donated millions to the Clinton Foundation. Former President Bill Clinton also gave a $500,00 speech sponsored by Renaissance Capital, a Russian investment firm connected to the deal, in Moscow in June 2010.

According to the New York Times, the Clintons did not disclose the cash that started flowing into their foundation as the deal went through.

The Times reported:

As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation.

Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.

On top of that, the Justice Department was investigating officials in Russia’s nuclear sector before the deal went through, but apparently, nobody in the Justice Department alerted Congress or the public. The Hill reported:

Rather than bring immediate charges in 2010, however, the Department of Justice (DOJ) continued investigating the matter for nearly four more years, essentially leaving the American public and Congress in the dark about Russian nuclear corruption on U.S. soil during a period when the Obama administration made two major decisions benefiting Putin’s commercial nuclear ambitions.

It’s about time someone called the Clintons out on the corruption. The Clintons have to be held accountable, and if the Justice Department won’t hand over the records voluntarily, a lawsuit may be the only way.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 52194
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: If Hillary Goes Down So Will Obama

Post  Admin on Fri 13 Apr 2018, 10:21 am

Hillary Clinton blames loss on NRA, NRA fires back: ‘You’re exactly right’
April 10, 2018
https://www.conservativeinstitute.org/conservative-news/hillary-clinton-nra-loss.htm?
Hillary Clinton blames loss on NRA, NRA fires back: ‘You’re exactly right’
https://www.conservativeinstitute.org/conservative-news/hillary-clinton-nra-loss.htm
Hillary Clinton continues to humiliate herself by dredging up excuses for her surprise loss to Donald Trump. In what could easily be mistaken for a self-parody, Clinton has insisted that Russian President Vladimir Putin, former FBI Director James Comey, white supremacy, misogyny, and even submissive housewives were responsible for the shellacking she took on Nov. 8, 2016.

But Clinton may have finally gotten something right by crediting gun owners for her campaign’s failure. The National Rifle Association blasted Clinton’s latest “sob story” by pointing out that she was, indeed, “exactly right” to blame the “hard work and dedication” of “nearly six million” NRA members for her loss.
“It’s the NRA, stupid”
The NRA was responding to Clinton’s most recent tantrum — this time at New York’s elitist, ladies-only clubhouse known as The Wing — where she gave a familiar speech echoing the same outrageous themes first presented in her campaign blame-all book, What Happened. As her monologue drifted from subject to victimized subject, Clinton insisted that a massive Russia-Trump conspiracy stole the election from her, before lamenting how the president “decimated” the State Department that she worked to fill with liberal bureaucrats.
Is it time for Hillary Clinton to go away?
Yes
No
Next
Although Clinton couldn’t be further detached from reality, she did make one solid point. Referencing the more than $20 million that the NRA spent on educating the public about her strict gun control stance, Clinton said, “You know the NRA has spent more money on me than any other candidate,” before quipping, “We’ll find out if any of that was Russian money.”
NRATV, the media arm of the gun advocacy group, thankful for the publicity from Mrs. Clinton, tweeted a fiery video response from firearms enthusiast and gun rights defender Grant Stinchfield. Watch below:
NRATV

@NRATV
 “@HillaryClinton here's where your sob story gets real. That the reason you lost was because of the #NRA. You’re exactly right. Spot on & thank you for the acknowledgment of the nearly 6 million members’ hard work & dedication to get @realDonaldTrump elected.” -@stinchfield1776

8:34 PM - Apr 5, 2018
637
308 people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy
Before going after the pantsuit-wearing pol, however, Stinchfield defended the Trump administration’s successes:

Truthfully, I thought I was done with this woman years ago, but even after suffering her most humiliating loss in modern history, Hillary Clinton continues to return again and again and again. Yes, with the economy booming and ISIS all but destroyed, with Americans getting the tax cuts they deserve, [and] with Neil Gorsuch on the Supreme Court, Hillary Clinton lashed out claiming “America is in a really bad spot.”

Tell me, Hillary, were we doing better when your husband’s failed leadership caused two American soldiers to be dragged through the streets of Somalia? Were we in a “good spot” when you lied about Benghazi? Was America better off when Loretta Lynch met with your husband on a plane to discuss your crimes? When James Comey, Andrew McCabe and corrupted FBI officials refused to prosecute you, were you making anything better? You were making America vulnerable is what you were doing.

Pity party
Calling Clinton’s latest speech a “#MeToo pity session,” Stinchfield mocked Clinton’s excuses and deflections, arguing that Clinton has succumbed to a “post-deplorable delusional state.” 

For example, Mrs. Clinton believes that the “lock her up” chants that Trump supporters spontaneously invoke are a sign of sexism. “They’re still chanting it,” Clinton told the room full of Democratic women.

But Clinton is blind to her own misogyny. Asking Clinton to “pick up a copy of the Ken Starr Report,” Stinchfield explained:

Your entire career was built on the pillars of sexism and misogyny. You linked yourself to a powerful man and ride your way all the way to the top, all the whole beings escorted by armed drivers and guards for the past three decades. The millions of women you called “deplorables” drove their kids to school before driving themselves to work, and you want those women disarmed. The truth is, you want all of us disarmed.

Certainly, Clinton inspired “trepidation” in NRA members during the presidential race, explaining why the NRA spent so much to oppose her. The liberal millionaire demanded draconian background checks which ignored due process and a complete ban on so-called assault rifles — stances that clearly alarmed many Americans.

With a Supreme Court vacancy waiting to be filled by the next president, the NRA treated that election with the urgency it deserved. Stinchfield explained:

But Hillary Clinton, here is where your sob story gets real. The reason you lost was because of the NRA. You know what? You’re exactly right. Spot on! And thank you for the acknowledgment of the nearly six million members, of all their hard work and dedication to get Donald Trump elected. Because when you compare them — us — to the Iranians and communists, when you proposed Australian-style gun confiscation programs, assault weapons bans, when you called all of us “deplorables” we rallied together to send you packing.

#MeToo Meltdown
Stinchfield slammed the “political machine consisting of high-priced anti-gun hacks” which Clinton utilized to oppose the NRA. The former New York senator spent $1.2 billion to lose the election to Trump, who spent just half of that sum. Clinton collected truck-loads of cash from big banks to finance her doomed campaign — contributions that make the NRA’s donations look like a mere pittance.

The bottom line is that ordinary U.S. citizens rose up to take back the country from the political elite, connected by a sense of urgency to protect their right to self defense. “We rose up, took back the truth and defended our Second Amendment, and we fought for every freedom you sought to take away,” Stinchfield said. “So, the next time you have a meltdown about why you’re not president, remember this, Hillary Clinton: it’s the NRA, stupid.”
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 52194
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: If Hillary Goes Down So Will Obama

Post  Admin on Sat 07 Apr 2018, 6:27 pm

Hillary Clinton throws pity party: ‘Fox News is always trying to impeach me’
https://www.conservativeinstitute.org/conservative-news/hillary-impeach-fox-news.htm?
April 5, 2018
Hillary Clinton throws pity party: ‘Fox News is always trying to impeach me’
Image Source: YouTube
For the life of her, twice-failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton cannot figure out why on earth Republicans would want to dredge up her ignominious past. Speaking to a friendly New York audience earlier this week, the self-pitying former secretary of state lamented, “Fox News is always trying to impeach me” even though, she added, “that doesn’t apply to a private citizen.”

Impeachment-proof
Clinton, who styles herself as part of “the resistance,” an informal collection of left-wing dissidents who refuse to recognize the authority of the duly elected president of the United States, can’t understand why she continues to garner attention from conservative media sources. Clinton told her supporters that she finds all of the public scrutiny disheartening:

Fox News is always trying to impeach me, so somebody needs to tell them, that doesn’t apply to a private citizen. When you’ve been accused of everything like I have, and you realize some people believe it, it’s really depressing.

Hillary apparently labors under the assumption that all of her (too often criminal) past deeds should be forgotten or forgiven simply because she lost the presidential election. On top of that being simply wrong, it doesn’t take into account the fact that in a binary election, she would have been the President but for Trump’s unexpected victory, and her past would have created enormous political issues.

As an outspoken critic of the Trump administration who completed a book tour last summer blaming an exhaustive list of international personalities and social forces for her 2016 electoral defeat, Clinton isn’t going to get a pass from conservatives.

However, it isn’t just her graceless defeat that has created so much contempt for the former first lady among Republicans.

Lock her up already!
Clinton is the subject of several very real investigations following a number of developments that have come to light since Trump was elected and her Democratic patron left the White House. Her status as a private citizen won’t afford Clinton any legal protection from what is coming.

Should Hillary Clinton be held accountable?
Yes
No
Next
On Nov. 14, 2017, the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform opened an investigation seeking answers to why Clinton’s State Department approved the sale of a significant portion of U.S. uranium reserves to a Russian energy firm engaged in kickbacks, bribery, extortion and money laundering. Clinton’s agency was part of a board that approved the sale of 20 percent of America’s uranium reserves despite warnings from concerned officials.

FBI agents in Little Rock, Arkansas have interviewed at least one witness so far after the Justice Department launched a new inquiry to determine whether the Clinton Foundation engaged in any pay-to-play politics while she served as secretary of state.

The investigation will examine if Clinton promised any foreign powers favorable “government outcomes” in exchange for donations to her charity.

After pressure from the White House to determine what happened to as many as 33,000 “deleted” and “acid-washed” emails from Clinton’s unauthorized server, the DOJ is once again taking a look at an FBI investigation that formally ended in July of 2016.

Officials familiar with this renewed inquiry have alleged that Attorney General Jeff Sessions will be examining just how much classified information went over Clinton’s server, as well as reviewing the Obama-era investigation for any flaws or inconsistencies.

Clinton feeling the pressure
Clinton acknowledged the pressure from these criminal and ethical probes during this week’s conference. Without citing any specific examples, she said, “I’ve really been admiring the staying power of the resistance because it’s hard when you are fighting on so many fronts.”

The former first lady is right to be worried. Although Clinton won’t be impeached, the stakes are even higher for a private citizen subject to criminal proceedings for a long list of offenses.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 52194
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: If Hillary Goes Down So Will Obama

Post  Admin on Sun 01 Apr 2018, 11:54 pm

Whistleblower Says Obama Could Have Stopped Russian ‘Meddling,’ Did Nothing
March 28, 2018
Whistleblower Says Obama Could Have Stopped Russian ‘Meddling,’ Did Nothing
Image via ChameleonsEye / Shutterstock.com
Just how much blame falls with the Obama administration for the Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election?

According to former staffer Brett Bruen, Obama not only knew about the meddling, he did absolutely nothing to stop it.

Who is Brett Bruen
Bruen was the Director of Global Engagement from 2013-2015.

According to Bruen, the entire Obama administration was warned about the possibility of Russian meddling in 2014, but he was ignored.

His hypothesis was not unfounded, either.

Bruen looked at how the Russians had already wrecked elections in the Ukraine.

How They Did It
During the 2014 election in the Ukraine, the Russians more or less created the very same plan that was allegedly used here in the United States.

They had an all-out attack via social media and used propaganda to allegedly point the election in the direction they wanted.

A task force had been assembled to find out exactly what took place during that election.

When the task force, of which Bruen was part of, started cranking out fact sheets and video detailing the Russians actions, the Russians pulled back their efforts in the Ukraine election.

The Warning
Bruen stated, “I was sitting in the Situation Room saying, ‘Why do we continue to look at this as an issue that only concerns the Ukraine, that only concerns Eastern Europe.’”

“This is something that’s going to march across Western Europe. This is something that’s going to march over to our shores, and we need to be ready,” Bruen continued.

Funding Denied
Even with the warning, any effort to stop the Russians from doing the same thing here would have needed significant funding.

Sadly, the Obama administration chose to ignore Bruen as well as thinking the Russians would not dare try to do something like that in a United States election.

Now, think about that for second…

Obama’s administration had no problem assembling a task force to investigate another country’s election, yet no funding could be found to protect an election on our home soil.

Was this because Obama possibly knew one of the candidates of choice for the Russians was Bernie Sanders?

Do You Think the Russian Meddling is Obama’s Fault?
Yes
No
Next
Or maybe it was just that the administration was looking for a ready-made excuse for the eventual Hillary Clinton loss.

Either way, it is time for Jeff Sessions to open the book on the Obama administration and bring everyone involved in the deception of the American people to justice!
https://www.patriotnewsalerts.com/obama-did-nothing/?utm_source=boomtrain&utm_medium=automated&utm_campaign=cna1&utm_source=boomtrain&utm_medium=automated&utm_campaign=cna1





avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 52194
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: If Hillary Goes Down So Will Obama

Post  Admin on Mon 26 Mar 2018, 10:21 pm

Rush Limbaugh accuses Rod Rosenstein of exonerating Hillary Clinton in Whitewater scandal
https://www.conservativeinstitute.org/government-corruption/rush-limbaugh-accuses-rosenstein.htm?utm_source=boomtrain&utm_medium=NS1&utm_campaign=1522006334409&utm_source=boomtrain&utm_medium=NS1&utm_campaign=1522006334310
March 23, 2018

Rush Limbaugh accuses Rod Rosenstein of exonerating Hillary Clinton in Whitewater scandal
Image Source: Screenshot
In 2017, the Democrats successfully lobbied Attorney General Jeff Sessions to recuse himself from the investigation into alleged Russian interference because of his ties to the Donald Trump campaign and a pair of short, chance encounters he had with a Russian diplomat. As a result, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein was tapped to replace Sessions, and oversee the special counsel’s investigation into allegations that Trump colluded with the Russian government during the 2016 presidential race.

However, it turns out that — with Rosenstein’s blessing — Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation has since evolved into an unrestrained “fishing expedition” desperately searching for any misconduct to discredit the Trump administration — and syndicated conservative talk show host Rush Limbaugh knows exactly why. On the Tuesday broadcast of his radio program, Limbaugh pointed out Rosenstein’s scurrilous ties to the Clinton family and accused the deputy AG of “clearing Hillary” Clinton in the Whitewater scandal.

Friends in low places
In the months leading up to the 2016 presidential election, former secretary of State Hillary Clinton relied upon her friends in Washington to exonerate her for disseminating classified information over an unauthorized personal server.

Americans have since learned that FBI Director James Comey drafted a memo pardoning Clinton months before interviewing as many as 16 key witnesses in the case — including the prime suspect herself.

Additionally, an email intercepted between disgraced FBI paramours Peter Strzok and Lisa Page indicated that then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch knew in advance that Clinton would be pardoned — perhaps explaining the motive behind a mysterious Phoenix, Arizona tarmac meeting between Bill Clinton and Lynch days before the exoneration was formally announced.

Hillary Clinton’s troubling email server usage was not the only scandal from which she escaped unscathed. Clinton received a similar treatment from federal investigators and prosecutors during the various scandals that emerged during independent counsel Kenneth Starr’s long-running Whitewater investigation in the 90’s.

Limbaugh explained Rosenstein’s ties to this probe in his recent program:

It turns out that Rosenstein worked as a Whitewater prosecutor. … This guy was on the prosecution team of Whitewater, which, of course, found the Clintons had done nothing… I mean, you talk about incestuous.

Rosenstein himself interrogated Hillary Clinton on Jan. 14, 1998, in a speedy interview that lasted just 15 minutes. Later, he was appointed by former President Bill Clinton to work for the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Maryland.

The truth comes out
Rosenstein’s wife also has connections to the Clintons, Limbaugh explained:

Rosenstein’s wife then represented Bill Clinton shortly after Rod Rosenstein cleared Hillary in the Whitewater thing.

Rosenstein’s wife is Lisa Barsoomian, and she represented then-President Bill Clinton in a 1998-99 civil case in federal court.

Barsoomian represented Clinton in a civil case filed by Wyoming candidate and political activist Al Hamburg, filed just months after Rosenstein’s interview of the first lady.

Should Hillary Clinton be prosecuted for her crimes?
Yes
No
Next
“Washington hillbillies”
Limbaugh says these intimate political ties should disqualify Rosenstein from overseeing the special counsel investigation. He concluded:

In a way, Washington is like the hillbillies in the mountains. Everybody’s related to everybody. It’s a gigantic revolving door, and they all know each other, and they all work or are married to each other, and they work for the same people over and over and over again.

And this to me is further evidence why this guy, Rosenstein, ought not have any role in the Trump administration at all because the Trump administration is there to drain the swamp, not to promote it.

With Rosenstein in charge of Mueller, a partisan, Clinton loyalist has allowed the special counsel’s investigation to extend far beyond its original mandate of exploring Russia’s ties to the Trump team. Limbaugh noted, “Justice Department regulations require that a crime be named and that that is what the special counsel shall pursue,” although it appears that Mueller has been awarded “free rein” to explore Trump’s business relationships and his ties to just about everyone.

Limbaugh also argued that if the special counsel “encounters something else that is not within the purview of the crime being investigated, he’s gotta go back to the person that appointed him and seek permission to add this newly discovered crime to the investigation.”

However, the conservative pundit observed, “None of that has happened. Mueller has been given free rein by Rod Rosenstein.”
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 52194
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: If Hillary Goes Down So Will Obama

Post  Admin on Fri 23 Mar 2018, 9:42 pm

Report: Obama Used His Power to Help His Friends’ Businesses
March 22, 2018
Report: Obama Used His Power to Help His Friends’ Businesses
Image via Lacy Landre / CCL
We know establishment politicians are corrupt, that is just a gimme in today’s political world.

But, when you have a president that says he is cracking down on the corruption but is actually feeding his friends coffers, well, that just needs to be exposed… and it is exactly what Obama was allegedly doing, according to Lou Dobbs.

Obama Administration Creating Stock Crashes
For most of us, the news a school is or is not included in the GI Bill of Rights is not really all that big of a deal.

However, this is exactly what Peter Schweizer is claiming the Obama Administration did to help out his buddies.

The scam is very simple, but brilliant at the same time.

By excluding and including schools where benefits could be used, Obama and company created momentary crashes to take advantage of for investors.

No, Then Yes
The example Schweizer used was the University of Phoenix.

You have no doubt seen the for-profit university’s commercials on TV.

The administration says the school is no longer supported by the bill, which causes a massive crash.

Obama’s buddy Marty Nesbitt swings in and buys as much stock on the school as he can get his hands on.

Soon after, the administration changes its tune and says the school is now acceptable, causing the stock to blow up, creating a huge profit for Obama’s buddy Nesbitt.

‘It Was Rampant’
According to Schweizer, this was typical of the Obama administration

Schweizer stated, “And that pattern is repeated over and over again in other sectors of the economy. It was rampant.”

Should the Justice Department Open an Investigation on Obama?
Yes
No
Next
If this was true, it is one of the most blatant abuses of power in the history of our country.

Our Justice Department needs to immediately open an investigation into this and once and for all bring justice against Barack H. Obama.

https://www.conservativeinstitute.org/conservative-news/melania-responds-to-critics.htm?Melania Trump responds to her critics at
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 52194
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: If Hillary Goes Down So Will Obama

Post  Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 1 of 2 1, 2  Next

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum