Who is online?
In total there are 11 users online :: 0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 11 Guests :: 1 Bot

None

[ View the whole list ]


Most users ever online was 111 on Thu 12 Dec 2013, 2:28 am
Latest topics
» JIHAD WATCH
Today at 11:17 am by Admin

» Rashida Tlaib interview on Palestine, Trump’s America and becoming the first Muslim congresswoman
Today at 11:01 am by Admin

» TERRORISTS ATTACKS Various places
Today at 10:41 am by Admin

» ISRAEL BREAKING NEWS
Today at 10:34 am by Admin

» Delrifkah: HEBREW SAGE MIGHT SAY.
Today at 10:30 am by Admin

» +Dev+ Michael D. Inman Pastor
Today at 10:26 am by Admin

» WORTHY NEWS
Today at 10:21 am by Admin

» HEAVEN LETTERS
Today at 10:18 am by Admin

» Daily Disciples
Today at 10:17 am by Admin

»  BRITAIN NEWS AND ALERT's
Yesterday at 10:04 pm by Admin

» WORLD ISRAEL NEWS
Yesterday at 9:53 pm by Admin

» PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP
Yesterday at 9:45 pm by Admin

» Share your Jokes smiles here
Yesterday at 9:14 pm by Admin

» Obama not going away
Yesterday at 9:09 pm by Admin

» ENDTIME HEADLINES
Yesterday at 9:01 pm by Admin

» Mrs. P's Haven of Refuge Inspirational
Yesterday at 8:58 pm by Admin

» Sweden Officially Backs a CryptoCurrency and Establishes it as their Official Coin.
Yesterday at 4:10 pm by Admin

» Traitor: Elected Democrat Frees NM Jihadis
Yesterday at 3:16 pm by Admin

»  HONEST REPORTING Defending Israel from Media Bias plz read REGULAR UPDATES
Yesterday at 3:08 pm by Admin

» ISRAEL HISTORY
Yesterday at 2:55 pm by Admin

Navigation
 Portal
 Index
 Memberlist
 Profile
 FAQ
 Search

If Hillary Goes Down So Will Obama

Page 1 of 2 1, 2  Next

Go down

Re: If Hillary Goes Down So Will Obama

Post  Admin on Mon 13 Aug 2018, 7:52 pm

https://yournewswire.com/man-who-leaked-clintons-medical-records-found-dead/
Man Who Leaked Clinton’s Medical Records Found Dead
August 12, 2016 Sean Adl-Tabatabai News, US 540

The man who leaked Hillary Clinton's medical records to the public has been found dead
   
Russia’s Foreign Intelligence Service has issued a report saying that the father of a doctor treating Hillary Clinton for dementia was found killed this weekend after he leaked information about her deteriorating health to the public. 

According to the report, Vincent Fleck, the father of Clinton’s physician Dr. Daniel Fleck, was found near his home just 24 hours after releasing Hillary’s most secret medical records to the public.

Whatdoesitmean.com reports:

The SVR first became “alerted/alarmed” regarding the circumstances of this latest mysterious death associated with Hillary Clinton on 17 July, this report says, when a “known/suspected” Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) “hit team” traveled about 70 kilometers (44 miles) from their New York City “base/headquarters” to a small village named Mount Kisco, both being located in New York State.

Upon arriving in Mount Kisco, this report continues, this CIA “hit team” broke into a specialized small computer security companies annex office named Right Click Solutions, located at 322 East Main Street, but were “shocked/surprised” by the unexpected arrival of an off duty employee—who immediately called the local police forces when he noticed the break in—and who were only able to obtain a single laptop computer.

An “electronic interrogation” of this company and its customers to ascertain the CIA’s interest in it, this report says, revealed an anomaly where this computer security company had installed a “Snowden-like dead man’s switch” on the personal computer of man named Vincent Fleck.

In the SVR’s investigation of Vincent Fleck, this report continues, it was discovered that he was the father of Dr. Daniel Fleck—who is the personal physical therapist for Hillary Clinton and whose practice is located in New York City.

While SVR analysts were still investigating this case, this report notes, they received information this past Sunday (7 August) that Vincent Fleck had been reported dead in a mysterious swimming “event” near his home—and that was followed 24 hours later by the leaking to the public of Hillary Clinton’s secret medical reports from a Twitter account named @HillsMedlRecords—and that was nearly immediately shut down.

Prior to this Twitter account being shut down, however, this report continues, its creator was able to state “I hate to do this, but people need to need to know. Dr. Bardack was not honest about Hillary Clinton’s health and I have proof” and release several damaging medical documents—the most damaging being a diagnosis of Hillary Clinton that says she has “Complex Partial Seizures” and “Subcortical Vascular Dementia.”

Still unable to be determined by SVR analysts, this report says, is if this leak was done by Vincent Fleck acting alone, or by his son Dr. Daniel Fleck who was using his father’s computer in the mistaken belief he would not be discovered.

With Hillary Clinton’s health being reported in rapid decline, and her aides having to constantly keep her from falling, this report concludes, the US propaganda mainstream media is now reported to be “strangely silent” about telling the American people how ill she really is with dementia—leaving everyone to wonder if she’ll even be fit for office should she win the presidency.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 53157
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: If Hillary Goes Down So Will Obama

Post  Admin on Sat 11 Aug 2018, 7:43 pm

https://www.patriotnewsalerts.com/republican-activist-found-dead/?utm_medium=ci&utm_source=push&utm_campaign=pna
Republican activist found dead in his hotel room with plastic bag on his head
August 10, 2018 by Jerry McCormick
Republican activist found dead in his hotel room with plastic bag on his head
Photo via Fox News Twitter Video Screenshot
There may be more to the story than originally reported regarding the death of a Hillary Clinton investigator.

Peter Smith, a Republican activist, died of an apparent suicide in May 2017 — but there may be much more to the story.

Suicide or Murder
By all accounts, Peter Smith had no reason to take his life.

Quite the contrary, in fact. Smith was a Republican activist with a new purpose in life.

Smith had been revitalized by the Hillary Clinton email scandal.

He was one of the financiers trying to get Clinton’s emails publicized so the American people would know the truth.

But on May 14, 2017, the 81-year-old activist was found dead in his hotel room.

Smith did not take an overdose of pills, nor did he try to hang himself.

Instead, we are being expected to believe that Smith put a black plastic bag over his head to asphyxiate himself.

In an effort to find the truth, investigators have interviewed his close personal friends numerous times.

According to new reports, sources have stated there is far more to this story than meets the eye.

Suspicious
The timing of his death is what has everyone scratching their head.

Less than two weeks prior to his death, Smith had given an in-depth interview about his quest for Clinton’s emails.

There is also the scene of his “suicide,” which seemed far too neat for those that knew him best.

Smith had reportedly gathered his medical records, life insurance policy, as well as a suicide note to be discovered.

It just seemed as though everything was “packaged” so as not to question why he was committing suicide.

Do you think there's more to this story?
Yes
No
Next
That black plastic bag, though…

It just doesn’t seem likely someone like Smith would take his own life, let alone take it in such a brutal manner.

But we may never know the truth.

avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 53157
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: If Hillary Goes Down So Will Obama

Post  Admin on Mon 23 Jul 2018, 7:46 pm

How the Mighty Have Fallen: Hillary Clinton Shows Up in Apparent Hospital Gown To Bash Trump
https://www.westernjournal.com/ct/how-the-mighty-have-fallen-hillary-clinton-shows-up-in-apparent-hospital-gown-to-bash-trump/?utm_source=push&utm_medium=conservativetribune&utm_content=2018-07-22&utm_campaign=manualpost
BY JOE SAUNDERS
JULY 22, 2018 AT 2:08PM
In politics, bad optics can drown the best message.
So when Hillary Clinton showed up in New York’s Central Park on Saturday looking for all the world like she’d just rolled out of a hospital bed, seemingly wearing one of those gowns with the strings that tie in the back, the optics weren’t just bad.

They were downright awful.
The former first lady, junior senator from New York, secretary of state and the 2016 Democrat standard-bearer looked nothing like a woman who should at work in the Oval Office right now, cementing the legacy of Barack Obama’s dismal eight years in office by carrying on the progressive agenda into the future.

She looked instead like she’d just been discharged from one of the Big Apple’s more downscale hospitals, and somehow ended up on a stage in front of thousands of people by some hideous mistake.

TRENDING: How the Mighty Have Fallen: Hillary Clinton Shows Up in Apparent Hospital Gown To Bash Trump

Frankly, the pantsuits Hillary had made her signature look during a lifetime in politics might have been horrendous, but they would have been a vast improvement over Clinton’s outfit for New York’s annual Ozy Fest:View image on Twitter
John Hawkins
✔️
@johnhawkinsrwn
Oh my gosh, I didn't even know Hillary was sick until I saw her wearing a hospital gown in public. Get better soon, Hillary!

6:53 AM - Jul 22, 2018
236
161 people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy
What Clinton actually had to say wasn’t a whole lot more confidence-inspiring than her appearance.

Do you think there’s something wrong with Hillary Clinton besides her fashion sense?
Yes No
Completing this poll entitles you to Conservative Tribune news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
You’re logged in to Facebook. Click here to log out.
Naturally, she tried to bash President Donald Trump over hot-button issues like the controversy over dealing with illegal immigrants and complaining about last week’s summit between Trump and Russian leader Vladimir Putin, according to The Associated Press.

She appeared to offering travel help to illegal alien families that were separated because adults who are facing criminal prosecution – as illegal aliens should be – tend to be separated from children who aren’t facing criminal charges.

(Considering the Clintons’ record of charitable giving, the illegal aliens might be better off waiting to see the money before banking on a plane ticket.)

She also tried a jibe at Trump for what might have taken place while he met with Putin privately in Helsinki on Monday.

“The great mystery is why the president has not spoken up for our country and we saw that most clearly in this recent meeting with Putin,” she said.

Actually, a great mystery is why Democrats think anyone serious would ever consider them to be credible judges on what constitutes a good idea for national security. And Clinton’s personal history in that regard is even worse than normal for her party.

RELATED: Watch What Happens When Libs Think Obama and Hillary’s Quotes Are Trump’s

But the biggest mystery is why anyone in Clinton’s camp thought it would be a good idea to let her appear in public looking like an escapee from a secured mental ward.

The social media reactions were scathing.


avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 53157
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: If Hillary Goes Down So Will Obama

Post  Admin on Sat 21 Jul 2018, 7:42 pm

https://www.westernjournal.com/ct/hillary-calls-defending-diplomats-blindsided-benghazi-survivor-brings-dead-brothers/?utm_source=push&utm_medium=conservativetribune&utm_content=2018-07-20&utm_campaign=manualpost
Hillary Calls For ‘Defending Diplomats:’ Blindsided when Benghazi Survivor Brings Up Dead Brothers
BY BEN MARQUIS
JULY 20, 2018 AT 2:22PM
Share on Facebook Tweet Email Print
Failed Democrat presidential candidate Hillary Clinton has refused to step aside following her unexpected defeat in the 2016 election and has since that time seemingly made it a habit to repeatedly insert her foot into her mouth with ill-advised commentary and attacks on the man who beat her, President Donald Trump.

Most recently, Clinton launched an attack via Twitter on the president with regard to a rumor that had begun to circulate about a potential deal between the U.S. and Russia that would allow for individuals wanted by those nations to be questioned, even as they lived in the opposite nation.

According to The Daily Wire, one of those individuals wanted for questioning by Russia is former U.S. ambassador Michael McFaul, who the Russians accuse of being involved in a financial scam and who Clinton rushed to defend … which opened her up to a counterattack in regard to a different ambassador she failed to defend in the past.

Clinton tweeted, “Ambassador @McFaul is a patriot who has spent his career standing up for America. To see the White House even hesitate to defend a diplomat is deeply troubling.”
Hillary Clinton
✔️
@HillaryClinton
Ambassador @McFaul is a patriot who has spent his career standing up for America. To see the White House even hesitate to defend a diplomat is deeply troubling.

John Harwood
✔️
@JohnJHarwood
WH press sec Sanders acknowledged that Putin talked to Trump about his interest in prosecuting financier Bill Browder and former US ambassador Michael McFaul. she declined to rule out US cooperation in that effort, saying Trump would consult his national security team

3:25 PM - Jul 19, 2018
50.7K
21.2K people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy
TRENDING: Trump’s New Name for America’s Biggest Threat Is Sure To Send Leftists into a Frenzy
That particular message calling out the White House for failing to defend a diplomat didn’t sit particularly well with one of the survivors of the 2012 Benghazi terrorist attack, in which Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three others were killed by Libyan militants who attacked a U.S. diplomatic compound and CIA annex.
That survivor was Kris “Tanto” Paronto, a former Special Forces officer and Army Ranger who was one of several private security contractors who fended off repeated waves of attacks from the terrorists at the compound and a CIA annex in Benghazi while the Obama White House and then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton did nothing.

Kris Paronto
@KrisParonto
Are you f’n kidding me @HillaryClinton ?!!! You left Ambassador Stevens and us to die in Benghazi then spewed lie after lie to the family members of my dead teammates and to the world to cover it up and now you have the nerve to talk about defending diplomats?!You are disgusting!
Hillary Clinton
✔️
@HillaryClinton
Ambassador @McFaul is a patriot who has spent his career standing up for America. To see the White House even hesitate to defend a diplomat is deeply troubling. https://twitter.com/johnjharwood/status/1019656469304799232
10:28 PM - Jul 19, 2018
57.7K
35.5K people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy
Paronto tweeted, “Are you f’n kidding me @HillaryClinton ?!!! You left Ambassador Stevens and us to die in Benghazi then spewed lie after lie to the family members of my dead teammates and to the world to cover it up and now you have the nerve to talk about defending diplomats?!You are disgusting!”
Do you think Clinton should have refrained from tweeting about defending diplomats and protecting ambassadors?
Yes No
Completing this poll entitles you to Conservative Tribune news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
You're logged in to Facebook. Click here to log out.
On top of doing nothing for the 13 hours during which the waves of terror assaults raged, Clinton and the Obama White House then worked to downplay and cover up the attack in the aftermath, even going so far as to lie repeatedly to the public about the cause of the attack and their failure to respond to warnings of an imminent attack ahead of time.
Those characters, in conjunction with establishment politicians in Congress, then worked diligently to smear and undermine the credibility of Benghazi survivors, like Paronto, as well as the family members of those killed in the attack in order to protect the future political ambitions of both former President Barack Obama and would-be president Clinton.
According to NBC News, the issue with McFaul came to a head following Trump’s summit in Helsinki, Finland, with Russian President Vladimir Putin, during which Putin had offered to allow U.S. investigators under Special Counsel Robert Mueller to travel to Russia to interview Russian intelligence officials indicted over alleged 2016 election interference efforts.
In exchange, Russian investigators would be allowed to question McFaul, and potentially others, in a deal that Trump initially found to be intriguing and was described as “an incredible offer.”

White House press secretary Sarah Sanders had stated Wednesday that there had been some discussion of the idea but no commitments had been made, then clarified on Thursday that Trump ultimately disagreed with the proposal put forward by Putin and would not allow McFaul, or anyone else, to be questioned by the Russians.

RELATED: Hillary Tries Taking Cheap Shot at Trump, Winds Up Knocking Herself Out Instead

Nevertheless, Clinton’s tweet — which reeks of a lack of self-awareness — went out anyway and left herself open to be hit on her hypocrisy by a number of Twitter users, not just Paronto.

This is just the latest example of a moment where Clinton likely would’ve been better off keeping her mouth shut instead of opening it and reminding everyone of her history of failed leadership.

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers' newsfeeds and is instead promoting mainstream media sources. When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content. Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 53157
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: If Hillary Goes Down So Will Obama

Post  Admin on Fri 20 Jul 2018, 2:53 pm

Mikehttps://www.patriotnewsalerts.com/huckabee-slams-hillary-clinton/?utm_medium=ci&utm_source=push&utm_campaign=pna
Huckabee slams Hillary Clinton for Russia hypocrisy
July 19, 2018 by Jerry McCormick
Mike Huckabee slams Hillary Clinton for Russia hypocrisy
Image via Gage Skidmore / CCL
Hillary Clinton decided to take a cheap shot at President Donald Trump during his meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin.

After seeing her idiotic comment, former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee absolutely unloaded on Clinton, slamming her over her previous, questionable relationships with the Russians.

Just Stupid
When you know you have skeletons in your closet on a certain subject, you normally sit back and let everyone else take their shots.

Hillary, though, is simply too stupid to do that.

As everyone was taking shots at Trump for his post-summit press conference with Putin, Hillary decided to get her two cents in:


Hillary Clinton
✔️
@HillaryClinton
Great World Cup. Question for President Trump as he meets Putin: Do you know which team you play for?

1:15 AM - Jul 16, 2018
270K
102K people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy
Hillary, as most know by now, sold massive Uranium rights off to Russia. And let’s not forget about the infamous “reset” button Hillary offered the Russians while Obama was in office.

Need we also point out the numerous occasions the Russians were have found to have hacked American government computers while Obama was in office — yet nothing was ever done.

Enough!
Huckabee apparently hit his breaking point, as he unleashed a tweet that absolutely shredded Hillary Clinton:


Gov. Mike Huckabee
✔️
@GovMikeHuckabee
Hillary tweeted, “Q for Trump as he meets Putin: Do U know which team you play for?” @POTUS never accepted $500K dollars for 1 speech from Russian bank, taken $140m for his foundation from Russian sources, or sold Russia 1/5 of US uranium supply. Which team are YOU on, Hillary?

12:43 PM - Jul 16, 2018
55.1K
29.3K people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy
Criticize Trump if you must, but he always has the best interest of the United States as his number one priority.

Do You Support Trump as Your President?
Yes
No
Next
The Democrats and Clinton in particular have proven that far more often than not, their own self interests take precedence over anything else.

Next time, Hillary, do us all a favor and keep your mouth shut.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 53157
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: If Hillary Goes Down So Will Obama

Post  Admin on Thu 19 Jul 2018, 5:07 pm

http://thefederalist.com/2018/04/24/bombshell-fec-records-indicate-hillary-campaign-illegally-laundered-84-million/
CRIME
Bombshell: FEC Records Indicate Hillary Campaign Illegally Laundered $84 Million
The mainstream media took no notice of a federal court filing that exposes a $84 million money-laundering conspiracy Democrats executed during the 2016 presidential election.
Margot Cleveland By Margot Cleveland
APRIL 24, 2018
The press continues to feed the dying Russia collusion conspiracy theory, spending Friday’s news cycle regurgitating Democrat talking points from the just-filed Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act lawsuit against the Trump campaign, WikiLeaks, and Russia.

Yet the mainstream media took no notice of last week’s federal court filing that exposes an $84 million money-laundering conspiracy the Democratic National Committee and the Hillary Clinton campaign executed during the 2016 presidential election in violation of federal campaign-finance law.

That lawsuit, filed last week in a DC district court, summarizes the DNC-Clinton conspiracy and provides detailed evidence from Federal Election Commission (FEC) filings confirming the complaint’s allegations that Democrats undertook an extensive scheme to violate federal campaign limits.

From Bundling To Money Laundering
Dan Backer, a campaign-finance lawyer and attorney-of-record in the lawsuit, explained the underlying law in an article for Investor’s Business Daily: Under federal law, “an individual donor can contribute $2,700 to any candidate, $10,000 to any state party committee, and (during the 2016 cycle) $33,400 to a national party’s main account. These groups can all get together and take a single check from a donor for the sum of those contribution limits—it’s legal because the donor cannot exceed the base limit for any one recipient. And state parties can make unlimited transfer to their national party.”

This legal loophole allows “bundlers” to raise large sums of money from wealthy donors—more than $400,000 at a time—filtering the funds to the national committees. Democrats and Republicans alike exploit this tactic. But once the money reaches the national committees, other limits apply.

Suspecting the DNC had exceeded those limits, a client of Backer’s, the Committee to Defend the President, began reviewing FEC filings to determine whether there was excessive coordination between the DNC and Clinton. What Backer discovered, as he explained in an interview, was much worse. There was “extensive evidence in the Democrats’ own FEC reports, when coupled with their own public statements that demonstrated massive straw man contributions papered through the state parties, to the DNC, and then directly to Clinton’s campaign—in clear violation of federal campaign-finance law.”

On behalf of his clients, on December 15, 2017 Backer filed an 86-page complaint with the FEC, asking the FEC to commence enforcement proceedings against Hillary Clinton, her campaign and its treasurer, the DNC and its treasurer, and the participating state Democratic committees. The complaint, and an attached exhibit consisting of nearly 20 pages of Excel spreadsheets, detailed the misconduct and provided concrete evidence supporting the allegations. In short, here’s what happened and what the evidence establishes.

Think Of It Like A Shell Game With Millions Of Dollars
During the 2016 presidential election, Hillary Clinton, the DNC, and participating state Democratic committees established the Hillary Victory Fund (HVF) as a joint fundraising committee to accept contributions from large donors, some exceeding $400,000. So far, so good. To comply with campaign finance law, the HVF needed to transfer the donations to the specified recipients, whether the Clinton campaign, down-ticket Democrats, the DNC, or state committees.

FEC records, however, show several large contributions reported as received by the HVF and the same amount on the same day (or occasionally the following day) recorded as received by the DNC from a state Democratic committee, but without the state Democratic committee ever reporting the contribution.

For instance, the HVF reported transferring $19,500 to the Mississippi Democratic Party on November 2, 2015, and the Democratic National Committee reported receiving $19,500 from the Mississippi Democratic Party on November 2, 2015. But the Mississippi Democratic Party never recorded the receipt or the disbursement of the $19,500, and without the Mississippi Democratic Party controlling the funds, the HVF’s contribution to the DNC violated campaign finance law.

Over a 13-month period, FEC records show some 30 separate occasions when the HVF transferred contributions totaling more than $10 million to the DNC without any corresponding record of the receipt or disbursement from the state parties, thus illegally leap-frogging the state Democratic parties.

On the other hand, of the contributions state parties reported as received from the HVF, 99 percent wound up at the DNC. They were transferred immediately or within a day or two, raising questions of whether the state Democratic committees truly exercised control over the money—something necessary under campaign finance law to allow a later-legal transfer to the DNC.

Again, the evidence is damning. According to Politico, “[w]hile state party officials were made aware that Clinton’s campaign would control the movement of the funds between participating committees, one operative who has relationships with multiple state parties said that some of their officials have complained that they weren’t notified of the transfers into and out of their accounts until after the fact.”

‘Using The Party As A Fundraising Clearinghouse’
But the Clinton campaign’s control of the contributions did not end once the funds reached the DNC, as the complaint filed with the FEC detailed. Rather, public statements by former DNC chairwoman Donna Brazile acknowledged that “[a]s Hillary’s campaign gained momentum, she resolved the party’s debt and put it on a starvation diet. It had become dependent on her campaign for survival, for which she expected to wield control of its operations.”

Gary Gensler, the chief financial officer of the Clinton campaign, which operated as Hillary For America “HFA,” out of Brooklyn, New York, likewise stated that the Democratic Party was “fully under the control of the Clinton campaign . . . . The campaign had the DNC on life support, giving it money every month to meet its basic expenses, while the campaign was using the party as a fund-raising clearinghouse.”

By excercising control over the DNC’s funds, including funds transferred from the HVF through the state parties, the contributions qualified as donations to the Clinton campaign for purposes of federal campaign finance law, and when properly accounted for exceeded the legal contribution limits.

The Supreme Court Made It Clear This Is Illegal
The illegality of this scheme isn’t a matter of debate. The Supreme Court made clear in 2014 in McCutcheon v. FEC that this exact scenario would violate the law. Here’s how the court laid it out: “[A] donor gives a $500,000 check to a joint fundraising committee composed of a candidate, a national party committee, and most of the party’s state party committees. The committees divide up the money so that each one receives the maximum contribution permissible under the base limits, but then each transfers its allocated portion to the same single committee. That committee uses the money for coordinated expenditures on behalf of a particular candidate.”

The Supreme Court then declared: “Lest there be any confusion, a joint fundraising committee is simply a mechanism for individual committees to raise funds collectively, not to circumvent base limits or earmarking rules. Under no circumstances may a contribution to a joint fundraising committee result in an allocation that exceeds the contribution limits applicable to its constituent parts; the committee is in fact required to return any excess funds to the contributor.” And “the earmarking provision prohibits an individual from directing funds ‘through an intermediary or conduit to a particular candidate.”

This “scenario could not succeed,” the Supreme Court explained, “without assuming that nearly 50 separate party committees would engage in a transparent violation of the earmarking rules (and that they would not be caught if they did).” Caught Clinton was. Yet the FEC failed to act on Backer’s complaint, even though federal law authorizes any person to file “a complaint with the FEC alleging a violation of federal campaign finance law.”

FEC Declines To Follow The Law
Upon receipt of Backer’s complaint, the FEC was required to notify those accused of violating federal law of the charges. Then the commissioners were required to determine whether there was “reason to believe” a violation occurred. Following a finding by four FEC commissioners that there was “reason to believe” a violation has occurred, the FEC must investigate the complaint.

Last week Backer turned to federal court, seeking to force the FEC to fulfill its statutory duty.
But in this case, the FEC did nothing, other than pressumably notify the DNC and Clinton of the charges. Accordingly, last week Backer turned to federal court, seeking to force the FEC to fulfill its statutory duty, as provided by federal law.

Specifically, the controlling statute provides that should the FEC fail to act, “during the 120-day period beginning on the date the complaint is filed,” the aggrieved party “may file a petition with the United States District Court for the District of Columbia,” alleging the FEC’s “failure to act is contrary to law, [the court] may direct the Commission to conform with such declaration within 30 days.”

Given the overwhelming evidence of illegal campaign contributions Backer detailed in the complaint he filed with the FEC against Clinton, the DNC, and the state Democratic parties, there is more than sufficient evidence for the FEC to have “reason to believe” they violated federal campaign finance law.

So why didn’t the FEC act? The answer to that question came Thursday, when FEC Vice Chair Ellen L. Weintraub issued a statement in another case, involving another complainant and another provision of federal campaign-finance law, but which nonetheless showed the FEC is dysfunctional.

Senate Democrats’ Delay Could Prove Fatal
As noted above, the FEC can investigate a complaint only upon a finding of “reason to believe” by four commissioners. But the six-member FEC currently only has four commissioners. By statute, the commissioners must come from different political parties, and by practice, the Senate confirms newly nominated commissioners in pairs, one Democrat and one Republican. Democrats, however, have yet to name a replacement, holding up the confirmation process and leaving in place for the foreseeable future a likely deadlock.

This deadlock, though, might prove fatal to Clinton and the DNC because, as Weintraub explained in her statement, Congress provided for just such a contingency: “Fire alarms are sometimes housed in boxes labeled ‘Break glass in case of emergency.’ The Federal Election Campaign Act has such a box; it’s the provision that allows complainants to sue respondents directly when the Federal Election Commission fails to enforce the law itself (52 USC § 30109(a)(8)(C)). In the 44-year history of the FEC, this provision has never been fully utilized. Today, I’m breaking the glass.”

Weintraub then went on to say that she believed the complainant in that case should pursue litigation, “as Congress provided for under the Federal Election Campaign Act,” because by placing the matter in private hands, the goal of enforcing “America’s campaign-finance laws fairly and effectively” can be best achieved. Just yesterday, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington took Weintraub’s hint and filed suit in federal court directly against the nonprofit group American Action Network, alleging violations of federal campaign-finance law.

Using Democrats’ Tactics Against Them
While Weintraub is a Democrat and complained about charges against the right-leaning American Action Network, the same glass-breaking provisions provide Backer the right to pursue his case against the DNC and Clinton directly.

Placing the matter in Backer’s hands, as an advocate for his client the Committee to Defend the President, in a federal court, and with the tools of discovery—including the ability to subpoena bank accounts, DNC communications, and question party officials and bundlers—promises to shine more sunlight on the Clinton and DNC shennanigans than the FEC’s behind-closed-doors consideration and investigation. Also, the Clintons and party officials should not be the only ones concerned: Every big-time donor in on the scheme and acting with the requisite intent faces criminal prosecution, as well.

Yet even with the overwhelming evidence of tsunami-level campaign-finance criminality—more than $84 million—the media instead chases the cloud cast over President Trump because of the $130,000 payment his attorney, Michael Cohen, made to Stormy Daniels, and claims that payment constituted an illegal campaign contribution. One wonders what it will take to break through the mainstream media blackout. Maybe a few pointed unpresidential tweets from our commander-in-chief?

Margot Cleveland is a senior contributor to The Federalist. Cleveland served nearly 25 years as a permanent law clerk to a federal appellate judge and is a former full-time faculty member and current adjunct instructor at the college of business at the University of Notre Dame.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 53157
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: If Hillary Goes Down So Will Obama

Post  Admin on Fri 13 Jul 2018, 3:35 pm

Dead woman found in dumpster located at Huma Abedin’s apartment
https://www.patriotnewsalerts.com/dead-woman-found/?utm_medium=ci&utm_source=push&utm_campaign=pna
July 12, 2018 by Jerry McCormick
Dead woman found in dumpster located at Huma Abedin’s apartment
Image via a katz / Shutterstock.com
Death and Hillary Clinton associates… they just seem to go together.

On Tuesday, Huma Abedin’s neighbors were shocked to find a dead body in a trash compactor.

Scary Discovery
The apartment building is located in Manhattan’s Union Square.

Early Tuesday evening, an as-of-yet-unidentified woman was discovered in the trash compactor at the building.

At approximately 5pm local time, authorities were called about the body.

When police arrived, they found a 48-year-old woman unconscious and unresponsive.

Police believe the woman entered or was thrown into the compactor on the 27th floor.

This conclusion was reached because they found her purse in the landing area of the compact room on that floor of the building.

Police are still investigating the death and have not yet released any other details about the woman or any details related to how she died.

Huma and Anthony
Huma Abedin, as you may recall, was Hillary Clinton’s right hand during the presidential election.

Her husband, Anthony Weiner, is serving time for sexual misconduct charges.

According to court documents, Weiner had been involved in a “sexting” relationship with an underaged girl.

In September, Weiner was sentenced to 21 months in prison.

Even though he is in jail, he is still listed as the resident at one of the apartments in the building.

Will Abedin and Weiner Get Divorced?
Yes
No
Next
Initially, Abedin was set to divorce Weiner, but the petition was withdrawn in January.

Pundits surmised they were going to remain married so they could invoke spousal privilege to protect communications that could harm Hillary Clinton in any court case.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 53157
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: If Hillary Goes Down So Will Obama

Post  Admin on Mon 02 Jul 2018, 8:56 am

Hillary Clinton Turns Into Stammering Nightmare When Asked About Melania
https://www.westernjournal.com/ct/hillary-clinton-stammering-nightmare-when-asked-about-melania/?BY CILLIAN ZEAL 
JUNE 30, 2018 AT 10:35AM

 Share on Facebook Tweet Email Print
If Hillary Clinton was going to agree to what passes as a probing interview, probably one of the friendliest sources she could have picked was the London Guardian. The liberal rag has long functioned as a kind of admixture of MSNBC and The New York Times, somehow combining ostentatious leftism and a disregard for at least half of the story with the sobering pretensions of a journalistic enterprise that’s merely in the business of reporting the truth.

It’s really an impressive resolution of cognitive dissonance. Take their sub-headline for the interview: “She has made peace with losing the election — but not with Donald Trump. Now she is fighting to undo the damage of the president’s child-separation policy — and has no time for debates over civility.” Not even The Times — nay, not even the “Democracy Dies in Darkness” folks at The Washinton Post — would print something that shameless. Nice work, Guardian.

However, despite the friendly territory, even the Guardian was able to ask Hillary a question that turned her into a stammering nightmare. And surprisingly, it was a softball question about Melania Trump.

The question involved Melania’s “I really don’t care, do u?” jacket, which she wore as she was boarding a plane in Washington to visit illegal immigrant children in a Texas facility.

“I ask how (Clinton) interpreted the jacket the first lady wore to visit a child detention centre, bearing the opaque and intriguing slogan: ‘I really don’t care, do u?’” interviewer Decca Aitkenhead asked the former first lady in the interview, which was published Friday.

TRENDING: Hilarious: Dems Poll on Whom They Want To Run in 2020, Here Comes Another Term for Trump

“Clinton slumps back in her chair, wide eyed, arms spread, defeated by the mystery. ‘That, I have no idea. I have no idea. I can’t even … I don’t have any idea. I don’t know.’

“Does she feel sorry for the first lady? ‘I don’t know. I honestly don’t know.’”

If Clinton says “honestly” in any sentence, I’m usually pretty sure she’s not telling the truth. This time, I surprisingly believe her. Mentally, it seems, she’s all out of juice. Either that, or she realizes how fully petty and inconsequential this whole debate is and isn’t even willing to pursue it.

Oh, and she also used the interview to defend incivility among Democrats, because of course she did.

Do you think Hillary’s interview was self-serving?
Yes No
Completing this poll entitles you to Conservative Tribune news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
You’re logged in to Facebook. Click here to log out.
“Give me a break!” Clinton said when asked about it.

“What is more uncivil and cruel than taking children away? It should be met with resolve and strength. And if some of that comes across as a little uncivil, well, children’s lives are at stake; their futures are at stake. That is that ridiculous concept of bothsideism.”

Several things are let slide here — for instance, the fact that the policy is little different than that practiced by the Obama administration, under which she served; the fact that members of her own party are tacitly calling for physical confrontations with Republicans just one year after a madman shot up a baseball field of Republican congressmen simply for being Republican; the fact that she seems to be implying this behavior will continue until Democrats get their way on immigration, which is little more than blackmail.

All of these things could have been asked by Ms. Aitkenhead, who instead notes that “Clinton’s own speeches seldom fail to warn about the dangerously polarized divisions poisoning U.S. politics.” She then asks Clinton what she thought about her position as a “polarizing figure” and whether she’s considered “the possibility that her most effective contribution to healing the country’s divisions would be to withdraw from public life?”

“I’m sure they said that about Churchill between the wars, didn’t they?” Clinton responded, in a manner that even softball pitcher Aitkenhead acknowledges is “a fraction too quickly for the line to sound spontaneous.”

RELATED: Hilarious: Dems Poll on Whom They Want To Run in 2020, Here Comes Another Term for Trump

“I mean, I’m not comparing myself, but I’m just saying people said that, but he was right about Hitler, and a lot of people in England were wrong. And Churchill was a pain. He kept popping up all the time.”

She’s not comparing herself to Churchill or Trump to Hitler, she’s just — wait, that’s exactly what she’s doing. But you can see why. Churchill liked open borders. He went after Labour politicians for doing the same thing his government did — and defended Tories who made open threats against the opposition. He gave speeches warning about the dangerously polarized divisions poisoning British politics while poisoning British politics through division. Or not.

Hillary probably said it best: I can’t even.

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers' newsfeeds and is instead promoting mainstream media sources. When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content. Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 53157
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: If Hillary Goes Down So Will Obama

Post  Admin on Mon 25 Jun 2018, 7:16 pm

Lynch Promised Clinton Camp: I Won’t Let FBI ‘Go Too Far’ With Investigation [Report]
BY JOE SAUNDERS 
JUNE 25, 2018 AT 6:30AM
VIDEO 2.21  min  
 https://www.westernjournal.com/ct/lynch-promised-clinton-camp-i-wont-let-fbi-go-too-far-with-investigation-report/?utm_source=push&utm_medium=conservativetribune&utm_content=2018-06-25&utm_campaign=manualpost
The biggest shoe might be getting ready to drop.

The inspector general’s report on the FBI’s probe of Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server when she was secretary of state has already documented just how riddled the bureau was with bias against Donald Trump when he was the Republican candidate for president.

Now, one conservative commentator is suggesting the report holds proof that the corruption went all the way to the top of the Justice Department.

In a Twitter post last week, Paul Sperry, who has written extensively about the FBI in columns published by the New York Post, hinted that Inspector General Michael Horowitz could have solid grounds to show “obstruction” in the Clinton email case – by none other than former Attorney General Loretta Lynch.

Sperry wrote that Horowitz testified on Capitol Hill about parts of his report that remain classified, and Sperry had a guess as to some of what it contained.

TRENDING: Hypocrite: Anti-Gun David Hogg Caught Taking Stroll in NYC with Apparent Armed Guards Feet Away
Paul Sperry
@paulsperry_
 BREAKING: IG Horowitz testifies material implicating Lynch in possible obstruction of Hillary email case is contained in classified section of his report and that he will work with Congress to declassify it. Here is the possible smoking gun:https://nypost.com/2017/07/06/new-holes-in-loretta-lynchs-story-on-the-hillary-probe/ …
12:22 AM - Jun 19, 2018
New holes in Loretta Lynch’s story on the Hillary probe
When former Attorney General Loretta Lynch testified last year about her decision not to prosecute Hillary Clinton for mishandling classified information, she swore she never talked to “anyone” on
nypost.com
5,516
4,620 people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy
“BREAKING: IG Horowitz testifies material implicating Lynch in possible obstruction of Hillary email case is contained in classified section of his report and that he will work with Congress to declassify it,” Sperry wrote. “Here is the smoking gun …”

Sperry linked to one of his own columns in the Post from July 2017 that described a document indicating that Lynch had assured Clinton’s presidential campaign that she would make sure the FBI did not “go too far” in its investigation of the email case.

From even public information about the case, it’s pretty clear that Lynch kept a tight rein on it.

Did Loretta Lynch rein in the FBI’s Hillary Clinton investigation?
Yes No
Completing this poll entitles you to Conservative Tribune news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
You’re logged in to Facebook. Click here to log out.
Former FBI Director James Comey has publicly testified that Lynch wanted him to refer to the Clinton probe as a “matter” rather than an “investigation.” (Comey pretended he was “confused” and “concerned” by the semantic choice. Can a man who made it to the top of the FBI be that obtuse? The answer is “no.”)

But if the IG report really does contain proof that Lynch put a limit on the FBI’s investigation to benefit the woman most of the political world expected to be elected president of the United States in November 2016, it puts things in a different light.

Lynch’s now infamous meeting with former President Bill Clinton on an airport tarmac in Arizona on June 27, 2016, has never been adequately explained. The then-attorney general’s story that the two had crossed paths by accident never passed the laugh test.

On Sunday, The Washington Times reported that Clinton himself told investigators he only went to see Lynch on her Justice Department airplane because he did not want to be rude when he found out the two were parked at the same facility.

That doesn’t seem likely, to put it mildly.

RELATED: Nat. Archives Stumble onto New Obama Scandal — ‘Wholesale Destruction’ of Gov’t Records

What seems very possible, though, is that Lynch was keenly interested in keeping her job as the attorney general. And that Bill Clinton was interested in sounding her out about how much control she was exercising over the investigation into Hillary Clinton. Bill Clinton might have been in a position to guarantee Lynch would stay on as attorney general if Hillary won the election — or remind Lynch of a guarantee already made.

Does the still-classified section of the IG report hold proof that Lynch was willing to keep the FBI from going “too far” in investigating Hillary?

Democrats and the liberal media have been claiming – ludicrously – that Horowitz’s damning report actually cleared the FBI. It actually exposed the agency as filled with bias, staffed by agents who thought nothing of using the bureau’s awesome powers to try to rig a presidential election.

That was bad enough. But the biggest shoe might still be waiting to drop.

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers' newsfeeds and is instead promoting mainstream media sources. When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content. Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 53157
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: If Hillary Goes Down So Will Obama

Post  Admin on Sun 24 Jun 2018, 5:55 pm

DOJ Caves, Hands Over Massive Hillary, Russia Documents After GOP Threats
https://www.westernjournal.com/ct/doj-caves-hands-over-massive-hillary-russia-documents-after-gop-threats/?utm_source=push&utm_medium=conservativetribune&utm_content=2018-06-24&utm_campaign=manualpost
BY CILLIAN ZEAL 
JUNE 24, 2018 AT 8:55AM

 Share on Facebook Tweet Email Print
After months of stalling and escalating threats from Republicans in the House, the Department of Justice has handed documents related to the Hillary Clinton email investigation over to Congress, The Daily Caller reports.

The website reported the DOJ “claimed Saturday it has given House Republicans a trove of documents related to the Russia investigation and the probe against former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.”

Meanwhile, AshLee Strong, a spokeswoman for House Speaker Paul Ryan, said the DOJ had partially complied with the subpoenas issued by Congress for the material.

“Our efforts have resulted in the committees finally getting access to information that was sought months ago, but some important requests remain to be completed,” Strong said in a statement Saturday, according to the Washington Examiner.

“Additional time has been requested for the outstanding items, and based on our understanding of the process we believe that request is reasonable,” Strong added. “We expect the department to meet its full obligations to the two committees.”

TRENDING: Hypocrite: Anti-Gun David Hogg Caught Taking Stroll in NYC with Apparent Armed Guards Feet Away

More than 1,000 new documents had been turned over to the House Oversight and Judiciary Committees after contempt of Congress and even impeachment of Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein were floated by members of the committees.


Mark Meadows
✔️
@RepMarkMeadows
 New reports of DOJ/FBI compliance with document requests are NOT accurate. While they have turned over additional documents, the new documents represent a small percentage of what they owe.

The notion that DOJ/FBI have been forthcoming with Congress is false.

10:39 PM - Jun 23, 2018
20.4K
13.7K people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy
Last week, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes, a California Republican, warned there would be “there will be hell to pay” if the documents weren’t turned over to congressional investigators.

“We can’t force the resignation, but we can hold in contempt, we can pass resolutions, we can impeach. I think we’re getting close to there,” Nunes said in an appearance on Fox News.

Do you think these documents will yield new information?
Yes No
Continue with Facebook
— or —

Enter your email
Completing this poll entitles you to Conservative Tribune news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
You’re logged in to Facebook. Click here to log out.
He also said that if any of the records were withheld, they would “begin to take action against the Justice Department and FBI.”

Meanwhile, Rep. Trey Gowdy, a South Carolina Republican, said he was willing to take action on the House floor if the documents didn’t get turned over.

“We either have compliance, we have partial compliance or we have noncompliance,” Gowdy said.

“And Paul (Ryan) made it very clear; there’s going to be action on the floor of the House this week if the FBI and DOJ do not comply with our subpoena request. So Rod Rosenstein, Chris Wray, you were in the meeting, you understood him just as clearly as I did. We’re going to get compliance or the House of Representatives is going to use its full arsenal of constitutional weapons to gain compliance,” Gowdy added.

That, apparently, compelled action.

RELATED: Army Col. Blows Dem Minds: What if DOJ Treated a Black Man Like They Treat Trump?

In addition to the documents, the DOJ also made Nunes aware of a classified letter sent to the committee regarding “confidential human sources” that the FBI had used prior to beginning the Trump-Russia probe.

The House Intelligence Committee has been seeking information on the propriety of human intelligence used against the Trump campaign during the 2016 election, including an informant used to gather information on the campaign and the particulars of the Steele Dossier, which was funded in part by Hillary Clinton’s campaign and the DNC and was used to obtain a search warrant against Trump campaign functionary Carter Page.

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers' newsfeeds and is instead promoting mainstream media sources. When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content. Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 53157
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: If Hillary Goes Down So Will Obama

Post  Admin on Fri 22 Jun 2018, 10:51 pm

https://www.westernjournal.com/ct/ex-clinton-secret-service-agent-files-conspiracy-charges-against-hillary-bill-podesta/?utm_source=push&utm_medium=conservativetribune&utm_content=2018-06-22&utm_campaign=manualpost
Ex-Clinton Secret Service Agent Files Conspiracy Charges Against Hillary, Bill, Podesta…
BY CILLIAN ZEAL 
JUNE 22, 2018 AT 6:14AM
VIDEO
 
In an action that’s gaining a lot of attention from deep state theorists everywhere, a former Secret Service agent under the Clinton administration has filed a RICO lawsuit against Bill and Hillary Clinton and a number of their associates, Zero Hedge reported.

Gary Byrne is probably best known as the author of a tell-all book about the Clintons, “Crisis of Character: A White House Secret Service Officer Discloses His Firsthand Experience with Hillary, Bill, and How They Operate.”

According to Fox News, the book described a volatile relationship between Bill and Hillary, which wasn’t exactly news. Also not news was that Hillary had an “appalling leadership style” and was “volcanic, impulsive, enabled by sycophants, and disdainful of the rules set for everyone else.”

There was a fairly lengthy list of what was new in the book. Byrne talks about covering up for Clinton’s numerous sexual dalliances. “I even secretly disposed of sordid physical evidence that might later have been used to convict the president,” he wrote. During one fight, he alleged, Hillary gave the president a black eye.

Byrne had previously gained a certain degree of fame as the man who had Monica Lewinsky transferred out of the White House when he raised questions about her persistent presence in the West Wing.

TRENDING: Trump: I’m Cutting All Aid to Countries Abusing America’s Immigration System [Video]

Now, his fame could be tied to one of the most curious lawsuits in recent years.

According to Zero Hedge, it’s not just William Jefferson and Hillary Rodham Clinton who are being targeted by the action. The multifarious tendrils of the Clinton empire are also named in the lawsuit — the Clinton Foundation, Clinton-Giustra Enterprise Partnership, the Clinton Global Initiative and former Clinton campaign manager John Podesta are also named.

Podesta isn’t the only Clinton crony to be named in these pages, either. David Brock, the liberal Washington gadabout, also features heavily in the suit. In addition to being directly named, many of Brock’s organizations — Media Matters for America, Correct the Record, American Bridge 21st Century and Shareblue — are also part of the suit. Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, a group which Brock left in December of 2016, made the roster as well.

Oh, and just for good measure, George Soros is included too.

Do you think this lawsuit has merit?
Yes No
Completing this poll entitles you to Conservative Tribune news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
You’re logged in to Facebook. Click here to log out.
As for the suit itself, Byrne claims that the Clintons and those around them took aim at Byrne as retribution for his role in Clinton’s impeachment.

“For the past decade in which relevant predicate acts were corruptly carried out by the named defendants as ‘payback’ for Plaintiff Gary Byrne’s role in the Clinton impeachment and his status as a ‘Clinton enemy’ (for his temerity in telling the truth concerning obstruction of justice and gross abuse of power), along with their corrupt surrogates and collaborators (referenced individually and collectively as the ‘Enterprise’), David Brock and William and Hillary Clinton have been synonymous with criminal behavior, malicious baseless attacks (using mainly the illicit and vicious defamatory tactics against perceived political enemies (like Officer Gary Byrne, the Plaintiff here) of those willing to compensate participants like Brock) — and coordinating by mail and wire to violate myriad Federal and State laws in the exploitation of Enterprise nonprofit entities they use for purely partisan purposes,” the suit reads.

Byrne claims that the Clintons have “taken such attacks to an unprecedented and chilling new level — involving illegal domestic human and electronic surveillance, and tradecraft such as ‘lures’ run at Byrne in order to obstruct the Hillary Clinton e-mail and Clinton Foundation Investigations by the agencies of the Obama government, all against private citizens in order to assist Hillary Clinton become the 45th President of the United States, destroy Gary Byrne, and enrich themselves.

“According to investigations of the United States Congress, and as anticipated to emerge from numerous ongoing government investigations, Hillary Clinton and certain other Enterprise named and unknown named, and high-level surrogates, colluded with Russian intelligence (SVR and FSB) and a disgraced (and according to a referral from the United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary, a putative criminal) former British intelligence officer (Christopher Steele) to accomplish their illicit and unconstitutional objectives. These Enterprise defendants, surrogates and participants have their opportunity to properly respond before a court they knowingly misled many times using the most powerful counterintelligence tools available. Let them do so now.”

The lawsuit continues to say that “Brock’s malfeasance became more precisely organized in the Enterprise, and thus fully weaponized, as he joined forces with former president William Jefferson Clinton … Hillary Rodham Clinton and funder George Soros (‘Soros’), and at various stages of the illegal Enterprise, the other defendants named here. They, and the Enterprise they formed to control the Democratic Party, took illicit advantage of a previously inviolate structural arrangement (between all three branches of our government) codified in the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (‘FISA’) by arranging for payment through smear merchants Fusion GPS to the Russian SVR and FSB and British (former) agent Christopher Steele (‘Steele’). To abolish their enemies, in other words, the Enterprise defendants were willing to defy all legal and constitutional dictates – including certain actors within the Obama Department of Justice ineffably misleading Article III colleagues resident in this very Court.

RELATED: Watch: When Asked to Apologize to Hillary, Injured Comey Goes After Her Instead

“This is sedition, bordering on treason, and patently illegal,” the brief notes.

This is the first case of its kind brought against a former U.S. president. It’s worth noting, however, that there’s more than a soupçon of the conspiratorial behind this. If he actually has evidence of any of this, this would indeed be very interesting. And, if the case involved anyone else, I’d likely just dismiss the whole thing out of hand.

Then again, this is the Clintons — and stranger things have happened. Until we see the proof, however, this will be yet another curious chapter in the very curious saga of Bill and Hillary Clinton.

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers' newsfeeds and is instead promoting mainstream media sources. When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content. Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 53157
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: If Hillary Goes Down So Will Obama

Post  Admin on Mon 18 Jun 2018, 9:23 am

https://www.westernjournal.com/ct/billionaire-clinton-obama-crony-caught-in-massive-fraud-scandal/?utm_source=push&utm_medium=westernjournalism&utm_content=2018-06-17&utm_campaign=manualpost
Billionaire Clinton, Obama Crony Caught in Massive Fraud Scandal
BY CILLIAN ZEAL 
JUNE 17, 2018 AT 10:16AM

 Share on Facebook  Tweet  Email  Print
In October of 2015, Elizabeth Holmes, the CEO of medical device startup Theranos, declared that “Every time you see a glass ceiling there’s an ‘iron woman’ underneath it.” America had every reason to believe she was one of them.

She was the “self-made billionaire” head of a company that was valued at $9 billion, which was at one point more than Uber or Spotify. Its Edison platform promised a revolutionary blood test that only required a finger prick as opposed to blood drawn from a vein. Bill Clinton interviewed her with Alibaba founder Jack Ma in an event for the Clinton Global Initiative. Barack Obama appointed her as a Presidential Ambassador for Global Entrepreneurship. She raised money for Hillary Clinton’s presidential run.

On Friday, Holmes was indicted on wire fraud charges by federal prosecutors in the Northern District of California. Theranos is very close to being liquidated, basically having lapsed into “Enron 2: Electric Boogaloo.”

As it turned out, its “revolutionary platform” could barely perform a few of the 240 tests the company had promised, and even then it didn’t perform them well. As Vanity Fair reports, Holmes, 34, could be spending decades in jail, all because the company she started in 2003 after dropping out of Stanford apparently turned out to be little more than a way to spend investors’ dollars, poorly.

“According to the indictment, Holmes and (Theranos COO and president Ramesh) Balwani used advertisements and solicitations to encourage and induce doctors and patients to use Theranos’s blood testing laboratory services, even though the defendants knew Theranos was not capable of consistently producing accurate and reliable results for certain blood tests,” a statement from the U.S. Attorney’s Office read. “The tests performed on Theranos technology, in addition, were likely to contain inaccurate and unreliable results.”

TRENDING: Liberals Spread Viral Photo of Child in Cage, Silenced After Learning Who Was Really Behind Photo`

“The indictment alleges that the defendants used a combination of direct communications, marketing materials, statements to the media, financial statements, models, and other information to defraud potential investors. Specifically, the defendants claimed that Theranos developed a revolutionary and proprietary analyzer that the defendants referred to by various names, including as the TSPU, Edison, or minilab. The defendants claimed the analyzer was able to perform a full range of clinical tests using small blood samples drawn from a finger stick. The defendants also represented that the analyzer could produce results that were more accurate and reliable than those yielded by conventional methods — all at a faster speed than previously possible.”

In addition to the criminal indictment, Holmes has already agreed to pay a civil penalty of $500,000 to the Securities and Exchange Commission for fraud in an agreement that mandated she not be able to head a public company for 10 years. (Theranos is a privately held company, although Holmes stepped down as CEO on Friday after her indictment.)

So, how did Elizabeth Holmes sucker so many people? It’s worth noting that this is a bipartisan scandal in many ways. Before he became defense secretary, James Mattis served on Theranos’ board, as did former Reagan administration Secretary of State George Shultz. (Shultz’s grandson was one of the whistleblowers on Theranos’ alleged illegal activity, according to The Wall Street Journal.) According to The New York Times, media mogul Rupert Murdoch and Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos lost huge amounts of money in the enterprise.

However, each of them seemed to have been taken either by the science behind Theranos’ device or the possible applications for it (in the case of Shultz and Mattis) or because it represented a prime investment opportunity (in the case of Murdoch and DeVos).

 Do you think that Elizabeth Holmes is guilty?
Yes No
Completing this poll entitles you to Conservative Tribune news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
You’re logged in to Facebook. Click here to log out.
When it comes to the Clintons and Obama, however, things get a bit murkier.

It probably won’t surprise you, given that she helmed a Silicon Valley startup, that Holmes was a Clinton donor. Not only that, but Hillary Clinton had planned to host a fundraiser at Theranos until media attention forced her to host it elsewhere. (Even liberals were embarrassed.) The planned $2,700 a head event was to feature Chelsea Clinton, but apparently even the media couldn’t ignore the fact that she was hosting an event at a company that was under federal investigation.

“(The event) is not connected to a specific company or policy, but a chance to talk directly to women in tech,” Clinton’s campaign said at the time, according to the Washington Free Beacon. “We frequently send initial invitations while host committees are still being formed and locations finalized. This was never a health care event and the location wasn’t set. It will not be at Theranos.”

That was hardly the only contact that the Clintons had with her, however. When Bill Clinton interviewed Holmes in 2015 for his Clinton Global Initiative, an arm of the scandal-plagued Clinton Foundation, he noted that she started the company when she was only 19.

“Don’t worry about the future, we’re in good hands,” Clinton said. Holmes, for her part, talked about bringing “equality” to health care.

RELATED: Ridiculous Video Shows Results of Clinton Admin’s Prep for NK Meeting

President Obama went even further than the Clintons in embracing Holmes. In 2015, he invited the CEO to the White House, where he made her a Presidential Ambassador for Global Entrepreneurship. If you’re wondering what a Presidential Ambassador for Global Entrepreneurship does, it’s stuff like this PSA:

So, what’s the overarching point here? Why would the Clintons and the Obama administration get so involved with Holmes? We don’t necessarily impugn their judgment on her company’s viability, inasmuch as almost nobody knew it was a fraud.

On the other hand, they didn’t really seem to care whether it was or not. Hillary Clinton’s campaign wanted to hold a campaign event at Theranos well after it became clear, thanks to The Wall Street Journal’s reporting, that the company was suspected at least of some very shady things.

The fact was that Elizabeth Holmes was a Democrat’s dream.

Here was a young, millennial woman CEO saying all the right things about breaking the glass ceiling and instituting “equality “in health care. So what if her product was promising things that seemed impossible? So what if her company was under investigation? After all, she just brushed it off as the ossified medical establishment coming after her company. She was great copy.

And so, in a way deeper than Theranos’ investors or board members did, they co-signed Holmes’ reputation as the next Steve Jobs. The great thing for the Democrat mind was that the next Jobs came in a package that echoed all of their political prejudices. Or, in a kind of corruption of philosophy and politics that’s worse — and deeper — than financial misdealing, was it that she was the next Steve Jobs because she echoed all of their political preferences?

We’ll probably never know the answer to that chicken-or-egg question. We do know one thing for sure, however:

If only the Clintons and Obama had waited a little while, they’d have figured out they were dealing not with a Steve Jobs but instead a Kenneth Lay.

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers' newsfeeds and is instead promoting mainstream media sources. When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content. Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 53157
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

FBI didn’t pursue Hillary investigation because there were too many crimes

Post  Admin on Sun 17 Jun 2018, 4:42 pm

Report: FBI didn’t pursue Hillary investigation because there were too many crimes
https://www.patriotnewsalerts.com/report-fbi-didnt-pursue/?utm_medium=ci&utm_source=push&utm_campaign=pna
June 16, 2018
Report: FBI didn’t pursue Hillary investigation because there were too many crimes
Photo via Fox News Twitter Video Screenshot
When a law enforcement agency throws up its hands because there’s simply too much wrongdoing, you know there is something incredibly wrong with the justice system in this country.

But that is exactly what happened when the FBI failed to investigate staff members of Hillary Clinton’s State Department.

The Admission
The Justice Department inspector general report on the Clinton email investigation has as many shocking revelations as a Tom Clancy novel.

The report slams leadership in the FBI for being blatantly negligent and inadequate in its performance during the investigation.

It also makes it plainly clear that former FBI Director James Comey’s agency was operating under the pretense that Clinton was going to win — and all of this would have just been swept under the rug anyway.

But sandwiched in between all of that is the fact the FBI simply did not do its job.

The report openly admits specific devices were never checked because the FBI was afraid of how much information would be revealed and the vastness of the devices it would have to check.

The agency also came to the conclusion that all would be best served by the State Department conducting an internal investigation.

How Can That Be?
Let that sink in for a moment…

A massive FBI investigation was ordered, and rather than do their job, the agency decided to kick the investigation back to the agency that was being investigated.

This might be acceptable if there was just one person being investigated.

However, as the report states, the violations of policy were so vast that dozens of people in the agency more than likely violated protocol for the handling of classified documents.

This would be like coming home to three guilty-looking children and a broken window and asking them to investigate who broke it and get back to you with the answer.

Anyone challenging President Donald Trump’s statement that he has been completely vindicated in the firing both Comey and former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe after seeing that report has a serious case of the crazies.

Should Sessions or Congress Order a New Investigation Into Hillary Clinton?
Yes
No
Next
Not only was Trump vindicated in terminating them both, but charges should be filed against them.

In addition, that report leaves no doubt there needs to be a real investigation into the Hillary Clinton email scandal. The FBI clearly failed us on this one.

https://www.freespeechtime.net/2017/12/iran-stones-women-saudi-arabia-beheads.html
Iran stones women, Saudi Arabia beheads them but the UN condemns Israel - Oxford University declares war on the UN
Facebook 16.8k      
The incredible Anne Bayefsky speaking about the UN when it comes to their treatment of Israel! Watch her present at The Oxford Union. 
Is anyone in the UN listening? 
Every Western country must stand with Israel against radical Islamic terrorism. 
The Israeli people face the frighteningening escalation of Islamic terror acts through Israel. 
The world is silent when Palestinians influct pain and death upon Israel but screams when Israel protects itself.

 The U.N is a Failing Institution | Prof Anne Bayefsky | 7 of 8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=1&v=84OMOc04ZIE

Britain, the US and Australia should stop funding the UN. 
The U.N. General Assembly elected Qatar, Congo and Pakistan to its top human rights body, joining existing members such as Saudi Arabia, China, Cuba and Venezuela. 

Countries that practice Sharia laws have been chosen to be human rights watchdogs. 
Even a country like Iran has been given a seat in the UN Human Rights Council. 
Iran Where women are stoned to death, where gays are executed in a public square. 
Christians are brutally persecuted in the Islamic Republic of Iran. 
Pastors are jailed for no reason, no reason other than for being Christian leaders. Christians have been lashed for sipping wine during prayer services; Christians have been brutally tortured for doing nothing more than practicing their faith. 

Saudi Arabia is the head of the Human Rights Council, a country where there are no Christian citizens, even Christian migrant workers are persecuted by the authorities if they practice their religion. 
No religion is allowed to exist in Saudi Arabia except Islam, anyone who leaves Islam is executed.
Pakistan is the worst country for Christians to live in. 
Under sharia blasphemy law Muslims murder Christians on false charges of insulting the Prophet Muhammad and the Koran. 

These countries are kidnapping the UN bodies to push the anti-Israel and anti-Western agenda. 
They use the United Nations to attack Israel which is the only democratic state in the Middle East where Christians are free and women are not considered citizens in rank. 

In the last two years Benjamin Netanyahu cut 90% of Israeli aid to the UN after U.N.'s Cultural Agency passed a resolution denying the Jewish and Christian connection to Jerusalem. 
Western countries should follow Israel - Cut all funding & Announce Withdrawal From U.N.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 53157
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: If Hillary Goes Down So Will Obama

Post  Admin on Sat 16 Jun 2018, 12:34 pm

Court sets hearing on motion to force Hillary Clinton email testimony
https://www.patriotnewsalerts.com/court-hearing-hillary-email/?
June 14, 2018
Court sets hearing on motion to force Hillary Clinton email testimony
Image via K2 images / Shutterstock.com
Hillary Clinton is no doubt squirming in her chair after a judge handed down a decision in her email scandal case.

Judge Emmet G. Sullivan issued a ruling that on Oct. 11, Clinton will finally be compelled to answer questions about her email practices.

Don’t Remember, Don’t Recall
Hillary Clinton has constantly accused Donald Trump of lying to the American people.

Perhaps Clinton would like to look in a mirror before throwing out accusations such as that.

When Clinton was questioned about her email practices, she outright declined to answer three questions.

The current ruling is meant to rectify that situation.

But don’t get too excited.

During her prior testimony, Clinton stated she “does not recall” almost two dozen times.

Keep in mind, now, this is the woman the Dems ran out there for president.

Yet she doesn’t seem to be able to remember anything that happened on her watch.

Objection!
In addition to not recalling anything, Clinton was not at all happy with someone challenging the way she did things as secretary of State.

Clinton objected to eight questions asked of her, as well as objecting to two definitions given during her testimony.

In all, Clinton used variations of the word “objection” 84 times during her prior testimony.

One More Thing
Judicial Watch will have one more day in court, as Judge Sullivan has agreed to hear arguments regarding the testimony of John Bentel.

Bentel, as you may recall, was the Director of Information Resource Management for the State Department.

Do You Think Hillary Will Be Indicted?
Yes
No
He outright refused to answer 87 questions, invoking the Fifth Amendment, when he was called to testify.

Hillary and friends need to realize this scandal is not going away anytime soon, no matter how hard they try to keep the wool pulled over the eyes of American citizens.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 53157
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: If Hillary Goes Down So Will Obama

Post  Admin on Fri 15 Jun 2018, 5:45 pm

Court sets hearing on motion to force Hillary Clinton email testimony
https://www.patriotnewsalerts.com/court-hearing-hillary-email/?utm_medium=ci&utm_source=push&utm_campaign=pna
June 14, 2018
Court sets hearing on motion to force Hillary Clinton email testimony
Image via K2 images / Shutterstock.com
Hillary Clinton is no doubt squirming in her chair after a judge handed down a decision in her email scandal case.

Judge Emmet G. Sullivan issued a ruling that on Oct. 11, Clinton will finally be compelled to answer questions about her email practices.

Don’t Remember, Don’t Recall
Hillary Clinton has constantly accused Donald Trump of lying to the American people.

Perhaps Clinton would like to look in a mirror before throwing out accusations such as that.

When Clinton was questioned about her email practices, she outright declined to answer three questions.

The current ruling is meant to rectify that situation.

But don’t get too excited.

During her prior testimony, Clinton stated she “does not recall” almost two dozen times.

Keep in mind, now, this is the woman the Dems ran out there for president.

Yet she doesn’t seem to be able to remember anything that happened on her watch.

Objection!
In addition to not recalling anything, Clinton was not at all happy with someone challenging the way she did things as secretary of State.

Clinton objected to eight questions asked of her, as well as objecting to two definitions given during her testimony.

In all, Clinton used variations of the word “objection” 84 times during her prior testimony.

One More Thing
Judicial Watch will have one more day in court, as Judge Sullivan has agreed to hear arguments regarding the testimony of John Bentel.

Bentel, as you may recall, was the Director of Information Resource Management for the State Department.

Do You Think Hillary Will Be Indicted?
Yes
No
Next
He outright refused to answer 87 questions, invoking the Fifth Amendment, when he was called to testify.

Hillary and friends need to realize this scandal is not going away anytime soon, no matter how hard they try to keep the wool pulled over the eyes of American citizens.

The King James Version (KJV), also known as the King James Bible (KJB) or simply the Authorized Version (AV), is an English translation of the Christian Bible for the Church of England, begun in 1604 and completed in 1611.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 53157
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: If Hillary Goes Down So Will Obama

Post  Admin on Sun 10 Jun 2018, 10:25 pm

Democratic Party Accused of Illegally Funneling Millions of Dollars to Clinton Campaign
https://www.westernjournal.com/funneling-millions-clinton-campaign/?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=newsletter-WJ&utm_campaign=dailyam&utm_content=western-journal
By Jack Davis 
June 9, 2018 at 9:55am
 Share on Facebook Tweet Email Print
Up to 40 state Democratic Party operations may have colluded with the Clinton campaign in the most recent presidential election to attempt an end run around campaign finance laws, according to a new lawsuit.

As a result, up to $84 million may have been funneled to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign, Fox News reported.

Dan Backer, a campaign finance attorney, filed the lawsuit.

It claims that the actions were part of an “unprecedented nationwide scheme to violate federal campaign finance law in which $84 million was effectively laundered over more than a year by the Hillary Victory Fund through dozens of state political party committees to the Democratic National Committee and, ultimately, to Hillary for America,” according to a complaint filed with the Federal Elections Commission by the Committee to Defend the President.

“The money was papered to make it look like it passed through state committees,” Backer said, according to the Bangor Daily News. However, he said, state parties never really had the money.

TRENDING: Stormy Daniels Hit with Defamation Lawsuit After Criticizing Former Lawyer

“And that makes this entire money laundering operation a scheme to circumvent base contribution limits to make massively excessive six-figure contributions through straw entities on paper in order to deliver them to Hillary Clinton’s control,” he said. “It is exceedingly illegal to do have done so.”

“You had individuals giving $300,000,” Backer said Friday, according to the Las Vegas Review-Journal. “They’re not doing it because they care about Nevada’s or Arkansas’ state party. They’re doing it to curry favor with and buy influence with Hillary Clinton.”

The money was initially raised through the Hillary Victory Fund, which had an agreement to share funds with the states. However, Backer contends, the money never arrived.

He said the fund supposedly sent $1.7 million to the Nevada Democratic Party from December 2015 to November 2016. But Nevada only reported receiving $146,200. Backer claims the money that did not go to Nevada went to the Democratic National Committee.

Did the Clinton campaign violate federal campaign laws?
Yes No
 
Completing this poll entitles you to The Western Journal news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
The remaining $1.6 million was sent by the Hillary Victory Fund to the Nevada party and received by the DNC and never appeared on the Nevada party’s reports, Backer contends.

Backer’s lawsuit claims that in Idaho, the plan sent $1.6 million to Clinton’s campaign that should have gone to the state party. However, the complaint also notes that state parties may not have had a role in the plan because all the transfers were made by the Clinton campaign or DNC, according to The Idaho Statesman.

Delaware’s state Democratic Party took in $2.4 million from the Hillary Victory Fund, but then shipped almost all of that according to WXDE.

Backer said the paper trail shows this was an organized effort by those associated with the Clinton campaign to circumvent campaign finance rules.

“There were 11 transactions where the Democratic State Committee of Delaware (Delaware Democratic Party) forwarded $2.5 million to the Democratic National Committee, and so these funds were raised, transferred to the Delaware Democratic Party and then transferred to the DNC on the exact same day, or at least that’s what was reported,” he said. “For example, November 2, 2016, $59,000 was reported transferred from the Hillary Victory Fund to the State Committee, and then the Delaware State Committee reports receiving it and then reports sending it to the DNC who also reports receiving that exact same amount.”

RELATED: George Soros: ‘Everything That Could Go Wrong, Has Gone Wrong’

Backer said the scheme breaks the law because “the Supreme Court has said that we can impose a contribution limit on how much any one individual can give to any one candidate, state party, or political action committee. It doesn’t pass the sniff test. If I give you a million dollars for your campaign, I may not have bought anything, but it looks that way. The Supreme Court has widely upheld these base limits.”

State-level Democrats downplayed Backer’s claims.

“This is nothing more than a bogus political stunt feebly designed to distract from vulnerable Republicans’ disastrous agenda,” said Helen Kalla, a spokeswoman for the Nevada Democratic Party.

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers' newsfeeds and is instead promoting mainstream media sources. When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content. Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 53157
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: If Hillary Goes Down So Will Obama

Post  Admin on Fri 08 Jun 2018, 9:33 am

https://www.westernjournal.com/ct/more-than-maga/?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=conservative-brief-WJ&utm_campaign=dailypm&utm_content=western-journal
The Hat Hillary Regrets More Than ‘MAGA’
BY SPONSORED CONTENT 

JUNE 7, 2018 AT 12:09PM

 Share on Facebook  Tweet  Email  Print
The red “Make America Great Again” hat has been an icon of politics in the United States since the first formative days of the 2016 election. It was the wakeup call Americans wanted and needed after years of politicians selling our country short and losing at every turn.

But there is a phrase that likely did more to galvanize voters than “Make America Great Again” ever did. Hillary Clinton’s “deplorable” comment was reprehensible, and did more to separate the “elite” from everyday Americans than anything else in the 2016 election.

The quick-witted conservatives at Patriot Depot helped turn this insult into a badge of honor, something that can identify a patriotic and hard-working American citizen. If you don’t have one, you can pick it up here!



TRENDING: The Hat Hillary Regrets More Than ‘MAGA’

Thankfully, Clinton’s ambitions for the White House were crushed when the same deplorables she loved to insult stood together for America and elected Donald J. Trump.

So, what is a deplorable?

According to Hillary, the 75 million Americans who make up the “basket of deplorables” she referenced are racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic and Islamaphobic. These are hardworking Americans — dads, mothers, first responders, military personnel, teachers and many others  — that Hillary had no interest in meeting.

But we know better. We know that lifetime members of the Deplorables Club are easy to see. They’re the ones tirelessly working to help friends, family and their fellow Americans. Often times their jobs are thankless and underappreciated.

The paramedic who is working 18-hour ambulance shifts helping to save people regardless of race, religion, or creed? She’s a Deplorable.

The dad working two jobs to send his kids to a good college? He’s a Deplorable, too.

The soldier selflessly fighting to ensure our freedom? He’s also a Deplorable.

It’s no surprise this insult became a point of pride. Everyday Americans were sick and tired of being told how they and their loved ones posed a danger to our country, so they donned this hat and hit the polls.

Since then, the political and cultural landscape of America has shifted back to something close to normalcy thanks to the hard work of Deplorables all over the country.

Your lifetime membership in the Deplorables Club is simple. In fact, you’re probably already a member. Now all you need to do is grab your badge of pride: Get your “Deplorables Club — Lifetime Member” hat here!

This article was written by Jared Harris.

Sponsored content is a service paid for by an advertiser and produced by Liftable Media.

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers' newsfeeds and is instead promoting mainstream media sources. When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content. Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 53157
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: If Hillary Goes Down So Will Obama

Post  Admin on Sun 03 Jun 2018, 9:37 pm

Timely Flashback: Hillary Clinton Predicted Trump’s Tax Plan Would Kill 3.5 Million Jobs
https://www.westernjournal.com/ct/clinton-trumps-plan-kill-jobs/?utm_source=push&utm_medium=westernjournalism&utm_content=2018-06-02&utm_campaign=manualpost
BY BEN MARQUIS 
JUNE 2, 2018 AT 10:54AM

 Share on Facebook Tweet Email Print
The Bureau of Labor released their employment report for the month of May on Friday, and it contained some incredibly good economic news for the United States and American workers.

CNBC reported that the jobs report revealed a total of 223,000 nonfarm payroll jobs had been added over the past month, and the unemployment rate had dropped to 3.8 percent — the lowest since April 2000. These numbers beat estimates of only 188,000 new jobs and the unemployment rate holding steady at 3.9 percent.

Contrast that good news with the dire predictions offered up in 2016 by countless economic analysts and “experts,” who warned that Donald Trump’s tax, trade and regulatory policies would result in a horrendous economic downturn, potentially on par with the “Great Depression” of the 1930s.

More specifically, Townhall’s Guy Benson flashed back to the rather grim prediction by failed Democrat candidate Hillary Clinton during the third presidential debate of the 2016 election.

See her prediction of a dismal Trump economy around the 2:25 mark in the video below:

TRENDING: After Samantha Bee Attacks Ivanka, Chelsea Clinton Finds Way To Go After Donald



“By contrast, Donald’s plan has been analyzed to conclude it might lose 3.5 million jobs,” Clinton said.

“Why? Because his whole plan is to cut taxes, to give the biggest tax breaks ever to the wealthy and to corporations, adding $20 trillion to our debt, and causing the kind of dislocation that we have seen before, because it truly will be trickle-down economics on steroids,” she continued.

“So the plan I have I think will actually produce greater opportunities. The plan he has will cost us jobs and possibly lead to another Great Recession,” Clinton added.

Are you pleased with Donald Trump's work on the economy?
Yes No
Continue with Facebook
-- or --

Enter your email
 
Completing this poll entitles you to Conservative Tribune news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
But Benson pointed out that while Clinton predicted Trump’s economic policies would result in 3.5 million jobs lost, a recent projection by the Congressional Budget Office suggested that job creation would actually be about 2.6 million more than the initial projections issued in 2017.

Furthermore, a CNBC report in April revealed that more than 3 million new jobs had already been created in the U.S. economy since Trump took office, almost the complete opposite of what Clinton had predicted.

Meanwhile, the massive tax cuts Trump signed into law have had a positive effect on far more than just the wealthy and corporations — one need only ask the tens of thousands of workers who received “crumbs” in the form of large bonuses from the businesses that employ them, proving that the tax cuts did indeed “trickle down.”

On top of that, a report from The Washington Post noted that the recent jobs report fueled speculation among analysts that the unemployment rate will continue to fall throughout the rest of this year, potentially to an astonishingly low level of 3.5 percent, the lowest rate since 1969.

As new jobs are being added and unemployment numbers are dropping, wages are actually beginning to rise as well — something not seen in quite some time — at a rate of 2.7 percent over this time last year.

RELATED: Judge Jeanine ‘Stunned’ and ‘Confused’ by Trey Gowdy’s Trump Spy Statement

Additional proof that runs contrary to Clinton’s dystopian vision of Trump’s economy is the fact that the Atlanta Federal Reserve Bank just increased their projection of Gross Domestic Product growth rate for the second quarter of 2018 from 4.7 to 4.8 percent, a key economic metric that indicates the underlying strength of the U.S. economy.

All in all, the U.S. economy is booming, largely due to the fact that Trump kept his campaign promises of cutting taxes on corporations and individuals and rolling back regulations that stifled economic growth.

Like so many other things, Clinton was dead wrong in her predictions of what Trump’s economic policies would bring about, as more and more American workers are finding out each and every payday.

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers' newsfeeds and is instead promoting mainstream media sources. When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content. Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you.




Hillary posts angry rant about Trump’s immigration policy
https://www.patriotnewsalerts.com/hillary-posts-angry-rant/?utm_medium=ci&utm_source=push&utm_campaign=pna
June 2, 2018
Hillary posts angry rant about Trump’s immigration policy
Photo via Fox News Twitter Video Screenshot
Hillary Clinton has gone off the deep end…

Clinton proved that very fact with a recent Twitter rant blaming Trump for the problems with illegal immigration.

She Missed One Fact
Hillary ripped off a series of tweets over “immigrant” families being ripped apart due to policies of this administration.

The only problem, though, is that Hillary missed one small word repeatedly in her rants.

While she constantly called these people immigrants, she neglected to say they were undocumented immigrants.

In other words, Hillary was defending criminal acts by immigrants and blaming the results of those actions on President Trump and his administration.

Bill’s Immigration Policy
To appreciate the insanity of Hillary comments, we need look no further than her own husband’s administration.

During the 1995 State of the Union, Bill outlined a very aggressive plan to lock down our borders.

Then-President Clinton stated, “That’s why our administration has moved to aggressively secure our borders more, by hiring a record number of new border guards, by deporting twice as many criminal aliens as ever before, by cracking down on illegal hiring, by barring welfare to illegal aliens.”

That speech got a standing ovation from both sides of the aisle.

Hillary herself often campaigned touting Bill’s tough stance on immigration.

The Hypocrisy
Obama himself once gave a similar speech, then along came Trump.

When Trump started making border security a major part of his platform, Democrats made a huge pivot to protect undocumented immigrants.

Then, of course, the Dreamers program was put in place.

Do You Support Trump’s Immigration Policy?
Yes
No
Next
The fact is these people are breaking the law, period, and Democrats want to reward them for it.

Hillary need look no further than her former president and the parents of these children for who caused this problem, not Trump.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 53157
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: If Hillary Goes Down So Will Obama

Post  Admin on Wed 30 May 2018, 9:13 pm

DOJ Inspector Finishes Review of Hillary Probe, Expected To Be Released to Congress Soon
By Randy DeSoto 
May 29, 2018 at 1:43pm
 Share on Facebook Tweet Email Print
The Justice Department’s Office of Inspector General has completed its report on the FBI and DOJ’s handling of the Hillary Clinton investigation during the 2016 presidential campaign, and its release to Congress could come any day.

“The intelligence agencies have to clear some certain classified material to be released,” former Congressman Jason Chaffetz told Fox News on Sunday.

Chaffetz added that he anticipates Inspector General Michael Horowitz’s report will be nonpartisan.

“I expect him to be a fair arbiter of what’s going on there,” said the former chair of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee. “I think it will bring us as close to the truth as we’ll ever get.”

Fox News reported in mid-May Horowitz had completed his report.

TRENDING: ‘Terrible President:’ Former ACLU President Attacks Obama on Free Speech Issues

“We will update you on the specific timing for the report’s release, and I will be prepared to provide a briefing and testify publicly about our findings and conclusions as soon as the report is released,” Horowitz said at the time.

In April, Horowitz sent a criminal referral to the DOJ regarding former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, who allegedly lied to federal investigators about leaking details to the media in October 2016 regarding the bureau’s Clinton Foundation investigation.

House Republicans are looking deeper into the FBI’s handling of the Clinton email probe, scheduling interviews with three witnesses for June after a four-month hiatus without interviews.

The inquiry is being run jointly by the Judiciary and House Oversight and Government Affairs committees, The Hill reported.

Do you think Hillary Clinton is guilty of criminal wrongdoing in relation to her email server?
Yes No
Continue with Facebook
-- or --

Enter your email
 
Completing this poll entitles you to The Western Journal news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
The three witnesses include Bill Priestap, the assistant director of the FBI’s counterintelligence division; Michael Steinbach, the former head of the FBI’s national security division; and John Giacalone, who preceded Steinbach as the bureau’s top national security official.

Priestap is of particular interest because of his leadership position over the Clinton and Russia probes. Among those who served under him was counterintelligence agent Peter Strzok, who was reportedly on hand when the bureau interviewed both Clinton and Michael Flynn, President Donald Trump’s former national security adviser.

Multiple texts released by the Department of Justice inspector general between Strzok and his mistress, then-FBI attorney Lisa Page, showed extreme bias against then-candidate Trump.

Strzok described Trump during the 2016 campaign as a “loathsome human” and an “idiot,” and found the prospect of him being president “terrifying.”

Page texted him, “There is no way (Trump) gets elected.”

RELATED: Hillary Clinton: I’d Like To Be the CEO of Facebook

Strzok then replied, “I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy’s office … that there’s no way he gets elected — but I’m afraid we can’t take that risk. It’s like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you’re 40.”

In another exchange, Page wrote “Trump should go f himself,” to which Strzok replied, “F Trump.”

Additionally, House Republicans introduced a resolution earlier this month calling for the appointment a second special counsel to look into alleged abuses at the FBI and Justice Department regarding multiple issues, including their handling of the Clinton email scandal and the reported spying on the Trump presidential campaign.

The 12-page resolution offers a detailed account of the many areas the members would call on the special counsel to investigate.

The subjects range from the “premature” closing of the investigation into Clinton’s unauthorized, unsecured private email server during her time as secretary of state, to her destruction of materials subject to grand jury and congressional subpoenas, to former FBI Director James Comey’s letter exonerating Clinton drafted before he interviewed numerous key witnesses (including Clinton), to donations received by the Clinton Foundation in light of the Uranium One deal.

Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich told Fox News last week that wrongdoing by the Obama administration and Clinton are continuing to come to light.

 

Newt Gingrich
✔️
@newtgingrich
 The system of corruption that Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton were in charge of is beginning to unravel. The Inspector General's reports are just the beginning. More and more information will come out that will show how unimaginably corrupt the previous administration was.

11:32 PM - May 23, 2018
14.8K
7,621 people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy
“The system of corruption that Obama and Clinton were in charge of is gradually beginning to unravel,” Gingrich said.

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers' newsfeeds and is instead promoting mainstream media sources. When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content. Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 53157
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: If Hillary Goes Down So Will Obama

Post  Admin on Sun 27 May 2018, 10:56 pm

Hillary admits she would like to be CEO of Facebook
May 26, 2018
https://www.patriotnewsalerts.com/hillary-ceo-of-facebook/?utm_medium=ci&utm_source=push&utm_campaign=pna
Image via a katz / Shutterstock.com
Hillary will do or say anything right now to keep her name in the headlines.

Her latest utterance came during an appearance at Harvard, when Hillary said she would like to be the CEO of Facebook.

Can You Imagine…
What would a world be like with someone like Hillary controlling the flow of news to people?

Hillary had made it quite clear than unless you are telling news with a liberal twist, she considers it to be fake news.

When asked what company, if she had her choice, to be CEO, Hillary made no bones about going after one of the most powerful sites in the world today… Facebook.

“Facebook. It’s the biggest news platform in the world,” Clinton stated.

She continued, “Most people in our country get their news, true or not, from Facebook.”

Clinton then went on to compliment David Ignatius, an associate editor and writer for the Washington Post.

A quick look at recent articles by Ignatius and it is quite apparent he has an agenda against not only President Trump, but conservative beliefs in general.

Conservatives Would Have No Voice
Clinton also went out of her way to slam several news sites by hinting they are manipulating the news.

Of course, the two she singled out were Fox News and Sinclair.

Clinton would much prefer the likes of CNN and MSNBC, where every bit of news gets twisted to push a liberal agenda.

Now imagine her in charge of a social media platform that has already put restrictions on conservative news.

If Clinton were in charge of Facebook, the entire country can rest assured the ONLY news that would get through would be news that shows liberal news in a positive light.

Would You Use Facebook if Hillary Was CEO?
Yes
No
Next
The bottom line here is Hillary Clinton continues to try to pull the wool over everyone’s eyes as some great savior for the rule of law and the truth.

This from a woman that has spent her entire political career threatening whistleblowers, hiding the truth, and breaking the law.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 53157
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: If Hillary Goes Down So Will Obama

Post  Admin on Sun 27 May 2018, 10:38 pm

Hillary Clinton covers up with heavy coat and scarf despite soaring temperatures
May 26, 2018
https://www.conservativeinstitute.org/conservative-news/hillary-clinton-heavy-coat.htm?utm_source=aimtell&utm_campaign=automated_push&utm_medium=push
Hillary Clinton covers up with heavy coat and scarf despite soaring temperatures
Gregory Reed / Shutterstock.com
New photos are raising more questions about Hillary Clinton’s health.

On Friday, Clinton was spotted wearing a heavy coat and a scarf in nearly 90-degree weather. What’s more, this wasn’t even the first time she’s been seen in this unseasonable outfit,  causing many to wonder just what the former secretary of state is hiding under all that clothing.

Clinton’s strange wardrobe
The newest photos came from Clinton’s recent visit to Harvard where she received the Radcliffe Award for her “transformative impact on society.” According to weather reports, temperatures in Boston, Massachusetts, reached nearly 90 degrees on Friday. But that didn’t stop her from wearing this covered up number:

View image on Twitter

Maura Healey
✔️
@maura_healey
 WATCH LIVE NOW - Maura's special conversation with @HillaryClinton at @RadInstitute #RadDay18. bit.ly 2s7nx6V  #MaPoli

5:58 PM - May 25, 2018
824
381 people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy

Lest anyone think that Clinton simply misjudged the weather, she has been seen wearing a nearly identical outfit on a number of recent occasions, including towards the end of April when she visited her daughter Chelsea in 80-degree New York weather.

What is Hillary hiding?
The obvious explanation would seem to be that Clinton has been trying to cover something up. But what?

As curiosity grew, perceptive individuals began to notice other oddities: that Clinton’s posture has been unnaturally erect, both when standing and sitting; that there seems to be some kind of protrusion coming from her back; and that she often wears a scarf strategically draped down her back, over whatever is jutting out.

Some believe that all signs point to a back brace, but there has been no confirmation of this.

Do you think Hillary is covering something up?
Yes
No
Next
Hillary’s health history
If Clinton is having trouble with her back, this would be the latest in what seems to be an ever-growing list of health issues.

Towards the end of 2017, the 70-year-old was seen wearing a surgical boot for months after falling down stairs and breaking her toe. Then, in early 2018, Clinton had to wear a cast, which she also tried to keep hidden, after slipping in a hotel bathroom and breaking her wrist.

In fact, staying on her feet has been a persistent problem for Clinton. Readers will likely recall the incident that occurred in 2016 when she collapsed while visiting the 9/11 memorial site. Subsequently, excuses ranged from a loss of balance to pneumonia.

In recent years, Clinton has also suffered from head injuries, blood clots, and violent coughing attacks.

Clinton has done her best to keep all of these problems hidden, presumably to maintain a strong appearance before her supporters. But this growing list of ailments suggests that Clinton’s health is becoming more and more fragile, making future political bids unlikely
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 53157
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: If Hillary Goes Down So Will Obama

Post  Admin on Fri 25 May 2018, 4:23 pm

PROOF! 'NO FIREWALL' BETWEEN HILLARY'S STATE, FOUNDATION
http://www.wnd.com/2018/05/proof-no-firewall-between-hillarys-state-foundation/
Feds confirm discovery of 'thousands' of connections while Clinton was in office
Published: 14 hours ago
Hillary Clinton (Photo: Twitter)

The Washington-watching American Center for Law and Justice has confirmed it will be getting “thousands” of documents connecting the State Department and the Clinton Foundation during the time that Hillary Clinton was secretary of State for Barack Obama.

“We have just uncovered a stunning revelation about the extent to which the Clinton State Department colluded with the Clinton Foundation,” the organization confirmed this week.

“Despite what Hillary Clinton told the American people, there was no firewall.”

The organization long has been pursuing a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit against the “Deep State Department” over details of Hillary Clinton’s tenure.

It was during that time she set up and ran a private email server that was unsecured for classified national secrets.

It was during that time Benghazi happened, and more.

Now the ACLJ has revealed it has learned the State Department as found “and will be forced to turn over to the ACLJ – literally thousands of documents to and about the Clinton Foundation, its subsidiaries, and its senior operatives.”

The latest documents to have been released, more than 330 pages, have been posted online.

The ACLJ reported that the volume of information that has been discovered, some 30,000 emails alone, “debunks the specious assertion that there was any kind of firewall whatsoever between Clinton’s State Department and the Clinton Foundation.”

Instead, they show “extensive communications exchanged between Clinton or her senior staff at State Department and Doug Band – a senior aide at the Clinton Foundation and creator of the Clinton Global Initiative (CGI).”

The problem is that as a senior official in the Obama administration, Hillary Clinton should not have been favoring her own family foundation with even information.

“In recent court filings, the State Department has revealed that more than 8,700 documents exist in Cheryl Mills’ and/or Huma Abedin’s files which contain the single search term, ‘Doug Band.’ It is possible, and indeed likely, that each document consists of several pages placing the number closer to 18,000 pages or more,” the ACLJ speculated.

Mills and Abedin were top aides for Hillary Clinton.

And, the ACLJ said, it also has learned another 22,000 documents exist in Cheryl Mills’ and Huma Abedin’s files (not including attachments) mentioning or referring to the Clinton Foundation or a related term referencing the foundation.

Find Out More >
55,336
The result is “overwhelming evidence of the corruption that occurred within the State Department during the time Hillary Clinton served as secretary of State.”

And they show she “intentionally lied” to America and misled the Senate Foreign Relations Committee during her confirmation hearings, the report said.

After all, that was when she promised “complete separation” between the interests of State and the benefits for her foundation.

The reality was, however, the ACLJ said, that “Band served as a liaison for Clinton donors looking for favors and official acts from the Clinton-run State Department.”

The evidence shows that if a foundation donor “needed help with a visa application in light of a prior criminal conviction or experienced complications with international travel, they contacted Doug Band and, within minutes of receiving their request, Doug Band would forward the request/favor to Huma Abedin or Cheryl Mills.”

Sometimes, even government employees looking for Clinton contacted Band for a response, the report says.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 53157
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: If Hillary Goes Down So Will Obama

Post  Admin on Tue 22 May 2018, 11:40 pm

Hillary campaign paid her own company $150,000
https://www.patriotnewsalerts.com/hillary-paid-her-own-company-150000/?utm_medium=ci&utm_source=push&utm_campaign=pna
May 21, 2018
Hillary campaign paid her own company $150,000
Image via aphrodite-in-nyc / CCL
Hillary just got caught with her hand in the cookie jar… again.

A new report has surfaced, showing Hillary Clinton funneling campaign cash to one of her Delaware-based LLC’s.

Leopards Don’t Change Their Spots
There is little doubt among conservatives that Hillary Clinton is a con artist.

She schemed her way through the political world on the coattails of her husband.

She did nothing while serving in New York other than having a street renamed, yet somehow catapulted herself into the presidential picture.

After getting crushed by Obama, she was handed a state department job to make her happy.

She took advantage of that position by garnering six-figure speaking fees for Bill and working a pay-to-play scheme for an audience with the president.

All the while, her family was in charge of a foundation that pays most of its donations out in salaries!

So, is anyone really surprised she is now linked to some pretty shady accounting practices involving leftover campaign funds?

The Scam
Since last May, ZFS Holdings LLC has received about $150,000 from the Clinton campaign.

Payment amounts have ranged from almost $10,000 to just under $33,000.

Now, this is where it gets interesting.

Hillary’s people are claiming the money being paid was for rent during the presidential campaign.

However, there were no rent payments made during the entire election to this company for this purpose.

The more likely scenario is Hillary is skimming a little cash off the top to dip her dirty little paws into leftover funds.

Campaign laws state leftover funds can be kept in a war chest for an upcoming campaign, to pay off campaign debt, or donated to charity.

None of these appear to be the case with these payments.

A DC attorney, Cleta Mitchell, stated, “So the question is whether this is really for rent of whether the payments are to this entity for other types of work for Hillary, which would be personal use if it is isn’t specifically tied to the winding down of the campaign.”

Do You Think Hillary Broke the Law?
Yes
No
Next
Since personal use is against the law, Hillary has some serious questions to answer and she better be able to back up those answers with proof.

And the sooner the better, because we all know how good Hillary and company are at covering their tracks!
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 53157
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: If Hillary Goes Down So Will Obama

Post  Admin on Mon 14 May 2018, 8:49 pm

https://www.patriotnewsalerts.com/hillary-clinton-slammed-trumps/?utm_medium=ci&utm_source=push&utm_campaign=pna
Hillary Clinton slammed Trump’s North Korea approach as “not useful” just months ago
May 13, 2018
Hillary Clinton slammed Trump’s North Korea approach as “not useful” just months ago
Photo Courtesy of Karen Murphy via Creative Commons License (flickr)
Hillary Clinton is rarely right about anything. In fact, she’s made being comically wrong almost an art form.


She’s the Picasso of poor predictions, the Mozart of missing the boat, the Da Vinci of dumb decision making. You get the point.


So it shouldn’t surprise anyone that she was dead wrong about Trump’s strategy on North Korea. 


Oops…
It happened on The View, a show that is usually so idiotic that it takes a special brand of crazy to stand out.


Hillary delivered.


When asked by Joy Behar about President Trump’s alleged “saber-rattling” towards North Korea, Hillary went on the record:


“North Korea, this is a very serious issue. What I’m most critical of is that you cannot deal with North Korea unless you deal with our allies.”


She added:


“It doesn’t help for the President on Twitter to insult South Korea. It is not useful in our trying to bring people together to deal with what is a very serious threat to our own national security.”


Not useful, she says.


Watch here (Hillary starts talking about North Korea at 2:22):




Come again?
Trump’s approach wasn’t “useful” in “bringing people together?” Really?


Just a few months later, North Korea has promised to destroy its nuclear arsenal in full view of foreign journalists.


They’ve promised to meet with President Trump at a summit conference to discuss the future.


They released American prisoners they held for years.


And they declared an end to the decades-long war with South Korea.


Seems like Trump’s approach was rather productive. It seems like he knows what he’s doing after all.


Is Hillary the most incompetent politician since Jimmy Carter?
Yes
No
Next
That’s more than you can say for Hillary. Even for her, this is embarrassing.


If she had a legacy to destroy, this would do it. Thank God she’s not in charge of anything.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 53157
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: If Hillary Goes Down So Will Obama

Post  Admin on Wed 09 May 2018, 8:47 pm

Newly revealed memo shows Hillary server was ‘lost’ by FBI
https://www.patriotnewsalerts.com/newly-revealed-memo-shows-hillary-server-was-lost-by-fbi/?utm_medium=ci&utm_source=push&utm_campaign=pna 
May 8, 2018
Newly revealed memo shows Hillary server was ‘lost’ by FBI
Image via Evan El-Amin / Shutterstock.com
We are all pretty sure the Hillary Clinton email/server investigation was botched by the FBI, but I doubt anyone really expected this.

Buried deep in FBI records recently released is proof the FBI actually lost the “chain of custody” trail for Hillary’s servers…

View image on Twitter
View image on Twitter

WikiLeaks
✔️
@wikileaks
 New FOIA docs show that FBI lost chain of custody for five weeks of Hillary Clinton's server. Say they lost the chain entirely and created a new one. https://vault.fbi.gov/hillary-r.-clinton/Hillary%20R.%20Clinton%20Part%2021%20of%2021/view

9:14 PM - May 5, 2018
5,105
5,030 people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy
Not a Big Deal, Right?
If you read the language in the report, it makes it sound like this is no big deal.

That could not be further from the truth, though.

The chain of custody for evidence is one of the single most important factors when handling evidence in any criminal case.

In essence, the FBI is admitting that someone could have gotten their hands on the server for nefarious purposes at some point.

In all, there were five weeks unaccounted for.

In this day and age, someone with the right skillset would need only hours, if not minutes, to change or delete records on the server.

What this essentially means in that server, for all intents and purposes, can never be used as evidence against Hillary because anything could have happened to it during the time where it “disappeared.”

Was this convenient loss of custody ordered by Obama, Lynch, or even one of the Clintons to their lackeys in the FBI?

Would anyone really be surprised if that is what actually happened? We think not!

What Now Comey?
This does not bode well for Comey, or McCabe for that matter.

Americans have already lost the trust of the agency, and this is only going to make things worse.

We already know Comey was drafting a letter to exonerate Hillary months before the investigation was over.

Could it be that Comey knew about this problem and did not tell anyone?
Yes
No
Next
Did he let her off the hook for fear of having gross negligence in the handling of the evidence exposed?

All this document did was create more questions for Comey and McCabe as well as some significant problems for both of them.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 53157
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: If Hillary Goes Down So Will Obama

Post  Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 1 of 2 1, 2  Next

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum