Who is online?
In total there are 12 users online :: 0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 12 Guests :: 2 Bots

None

[ View the whole list ]


Most users ever online was 111 on Thu 12 Dec 2013, 2:28 am
Latest topics
» JIHAD WATCH
Today at 11:17 am by Admin

» Rashida Tlaib interview on Palestine, Trump’s America and becoming the first Muslim congresswoman
Today at 11:01 am by Admin

» TERRORISTS ATTACKS Various places
Today at 10:41 am by Admin

» ISRAEL BREAKING NEWS
Today at 10:34 am by Admin

» Delrifkah: HEBREW SAGE MIGHT SAY.
Today at 10:30 am by Admin

» +Dev+ Michael D. Inman Pastor
Today at 10:26 am by Admin

» WORTHY NEWS
Today at 10:21 am by Admin

» HEAVEN LETTERS
Today at 10:18 am by Admin

» Daily Disciples
Today at 10:17 am by Admin

»  BRITAIN NEWS AND ALERT's
Yesterday at 10:04 pm by Admin

» WORLD ISRAEL NEWS
Yesterday at 9:53 pm by Admin

» PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP
Yesterday at 9:45 pm by Admin

» Share your Jokes smiles here
Yesterday at 9:14 pm by Admin

» Obama not going away
Yesterday at 9:09 pm by Admin

» ENDTIME HEADLINES
Yesterday at 9:01 pm by Admin

» Mrs. P's Haven of Refuge Inspirational
Yesterday at 8:58 pm by Admin

» Sweden Officially Backs a CryptoCurrency and Establishes it as their Official Coin.
Yesterday at 4:10 pm by Admin

» Traitor: Elected Democrat Frees NM Jihadis
Yesterday at 3:16 pm by Admin

»  HONEST REPORTING Defending Israel from Media Bias plz read REGULAR UPDATES
Yesterday at 3:08 pm by Admin

» ISRAEL HISTORY
Yesterday at 2:55 pm by Admin

Navigation
 Portal
 Index
 Memberlist
 Profile
 FAQ
 Search

If Hillary Goes Down So Will Obama

Page 2 of 2 Previous  1, 2

Go down

Re: If Hillary Goes Down So Will Obama

Post  Admin on Wed 09 May 2018, 4:10 pm

Photo of Hillary Clinton shows something protruding from her back
https://www.patriotnewsalerts.com/photo-of-hillary-clinton/?utm_medium=ci&utm_source=push&utm_campaign=pna
May 8, 2018
Photo of Hillary Clinton shows something protruding from her back
Photo Courtesy of Karen Murphy via Creative Commons License (flickr)
Something is oddly wrong with Hillary these days, and it did not take very long for people to pick up on it.

During a recent outing, a large protrusion from Hillary’s back was noticed, with amateur sleuths speculating she may now be wearing some sort of back brace…

View image on Twitter

deplorable susie
@gs777gs777
 Hillary Clinton - bullet-proof vest or back brace ?

7:14 AM - May 4, 2018
53
58 people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy
With the weather being what it was, everyone is very much right to wonder why Hillary was so bundled up and exactly what that protrusion on her back really was.

There are really only two options here:

Option 1: Back Brace
With all the medical problems Hillary has been having, the speculation that she is wearing some type of back brace is very real.

She has recently been seen wearing a cast on her wrist, so there is a very good chance she took another bad fall.

If that happened, it is not out of the realm that she hurt her back in the process.

Of course, we will never know if this is the case because Hillary doesn’t want anyone to know about her health.

Option 2: Bullet Proof Vest
Today’s political climate has made public appearances very dangerous for any political figure.

The random shooting during the congressional softball game is proof of that.

And let’s face facts, Hillary has not exactly endeared herself to very many people.

It is not exactly reaching to say someone might want to take a shot at her.

Bullet Proof Vest or Back Brace?
Yes
No
Next
From what we can tell, though, it would appear that option one is the more likely case here.

During yet another recent appearance, Hillary was sitting noticeably upright, so the lean here is that she is wearing some type of brace for a back problem.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 53157
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: If Hillary Goes Down So Will Obama

Post  Admin on Sun 06 May 2018, 5:52 pm

DOJ inspector postpones testimony after new Hillary email case leads found
https://www.patriotnewsalerts.com/doj-inspector-postpones-testimony/?utm_medium=ci&utm_source=push&utm_campaign=pna
May 5, 2018
DOJ inspector postpones testimony after new Hillary email case leads found
Image via K2 images / Shutterstock.com
There is just a little more hope that we may finally get some justice against Hillary Clinton.

Inspector General Michael Horowitz’s testimony before the House Oversight Committee has been delayed, so he can have more time to review new evidence in regard to the Hillary email investigation.

Bad News for Hillary
For what seems like years, the House Oversight Committee had been requesting information from the FBI related to Hillary’s email case.

Within the last couple of weeks, the committee was finally able to secure the release of the information it needed to fully investigate the case.

Now that the Inspector General has his hands on the information, the committee wants a report to find out exactly how Comey came to let Hillary off the hook.

While his original testimony date was scheduled for May 8, he will now look to testify as soon as he finishes his report on the case.

On the delay, Rep. Gowdy stated, “It is of the utmost importance that your review be fulsome, complete, and unimpeded as possible.”

Delay Should Not Be Long
According to reports, even though his testimony is being delayed, it should not be a significant delay.

Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, who has been facing considerable heat from the Trump administration over the raid of Cohen’s hotel room and office, seems very optimistic the report will present the Justice Department with a learning opportunity.

Rosenstein stated, “Within the next few weeks, I anticipate our inspector general will complete a comprehensive, fair, and nonpartisan report that answers many questions about how the Department of Justice handled a high-profile investigation during the last presidential campaign.”

“We will learn from it, and our Department will do better in the future,” Rosenstein added.

Now, that does not exactly sound like someone that is confident the investigation was actually handled properly.

That little tidbit is not good news for Comey, McCabe, or Hillary.

Comey had managed to dodge the bullet thus far, but this report could change that.

And McCabe, well, he is already hanging on by a thread.

Hillary should also be walking on egg shells right now.

If Horowitz finds a blatant mishandling of the case, there is a very good chance a new investigation will be opened up into the email scandal.

Without Obama putting pressure on the Justice Department, it is unlikely Hillary will like the outcome the second time around.

Do You Think the Hillary Email Investigation Was Handled Properly?
Yes
No
Next
If this report comes out the way we think it will come out, McCabe could be getting fitted for an orange jumper sooner rather than later.

And, with any luck, Hillary won’t be far behind him.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 53157
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: If Hillary Goes Down So Will Obama

Post  Admin on Thu 26 Apr 2018, 6:22 pm

https://www.conservativeinstitute.org/conservative-news/hillary-clinton-unleashed-staffers.htm?utm_source=aimtell&utm_campaign=automated_push&utm_medium=push
Report: Hillary Clinton ‘unleashed’ on staffers before debates with expletive-ridden rants
April 25, 2018
Report: Hillary Clinton ‘unleashed’ on staffers before debates with expletive-ridden rants
Image Source: Screenshot
A new book about the 2016 presidential campaign season is revealing the truth about the former secretary of State — and it isn’t pretty.

The book, Chasing Hillary: Ten Years, Two Presidential Campaigns and One Intact Glass Ceiling, was written by Amy Chozick, a New York Times journalist who covered Hillary Clinton during the campaign. According to Chozick, Clinton unleashed on her staff in a foul-mouthed rant during a debate prep session in 2016, when she reportedly ranted about her struggles with appearing “authentic” to voters and laced into Donald Trump, who she called “disgusting” in between f-bombs.

“You want authentic, here it is!” Clinton reportedly yelled, before melting down into what Chozick called a “f***-laced fusillade about what a ‘disgusting’ human being Trump was and how he didn’t deserve to even be in the arena.”

Hillary: Unleashed
According to Chozick’s book, Clinton’s staff knew that their boss sometimes needed to lash out on them before a debate to calm down. According to Chozick, “Aides understood that in order to keep it all together onstage, Hillary sometimes needed to unleash on them in private.”

But the book doesn’t stop there: Chozick also chronicles Clinton’s efforts to beat her own inauthentic image. According to Chozick, Clinton would reportedly rehearse empathetic body language to appear more relatable to debate questioners.

“Hillary would take a couple of steps toward the questioner, make eye contact, empathize,” Chozick wrote.

According to The Guardian, Chozick even dedicates three pages to discussing the campaign’s struggle to settle on an authentic-sounding slogan. The campaign considered some 84 slogans that they discarded, including, “You’ve earned a fair chance,” and, “No quit.”

The campaign also reportedly struggled with handling then-candidate Trump’s attacks on his adversary over the rape allegations against her husband. Chozick wrote that Clinton “erupted” when she reported in January 2016 that Clinton supporter and entertainer Lena Dunham was disturbed “by how, in the 1990s, the Clintons and their allies discredited women” who had accused Clinton of assault.

Are you glad that this book is revealing the truth about Hillary Clinton?
Yes
No
Next
Deplorables comments “always got a laugh”
Chozick spends most of her book recounting some of the most disturbing parts of the Clinton campaign, many of which were previously unknown to the public. According to the journalist, Clinton often joked about “deplorables” with friends in private, and her wisecracks were a big hit at parties in the Hamptons and Martha’s Vineyard.

“The Deplorables always got a laugh, over living-room chats in the Hamptons, at dinner parties under the stars on Martha’s Vineyard, over passed hors d’oeuvres in Beverly Hills, and during sunset cocktails in Silicon Valley,” Chozick wrote.

This allegation makes it clear that Clinton’s infamous “basket of deplorables” comment was not a one-off remark, but rather, part of an ironic classification of Trump voters. Clinton broke Trump supporters down into “three baskets,” writes Chozick: Republican loyalists, the economically depressed, and bigots.

Chozick further described these “baskets” in Clinton’s terms:

Basket #1: The Republicans who hated her and would vote Republican no matter who the nominee.

Basket #2: Voters whose jobs and livelihoods had disappeared, or as Hillary said, “who feel that the government has let them down, the economy has let them down, nobody cares about them, nobody worries about what happens in their lives and their futures.”

Basket #3: The Deplorables. This basket includes “the racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamophobic—you name it.”

“I really messed up,’ [Clinton] told aides that night,” Chozick wrote of the evening after Clinton’s “Deplorables” comment went public. Clinton even reportedly told a friend at one point, “Oh what’s the point? They’re never going to like me.”

But what the former secretary of State fails to realize is that it was more than just her comments that made her an unfavorable candidate. Clinton once said during a debate with Trump that she had a “public and a private position” on Wall Street. Now, it looks like that personality split runs deeper than we thought.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 53157
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: If Hillary Goes Down So Will Obama

Post  Admin on Sun 22 Apr 2018, 10:30 pm

Hillary told campaign staff she was ‘getting pretty tired’ of hearing about how no one likes her
https://www.patriotnewsalerts.com/nobody-likes-hillary/?utm_medium=ci&utm_source=push&utm_campaign=pna
April 21, 2018
Hillary told campaign staff she was ‘getting pretty tired’ of hearing about how no one likes her
Image via a katz / Shutterstock.com
One of the main reasons Hillary was not elected president was simply because people did not like her… and she knew it.
 
In a new book revealing inside details of the Clinton presidential campaigns, author Amy Chozick stated, “You know, I [Hillary] am getting pretty tired of hearing about how nobody likes me.”
 
The Tell All
Amy Chozick had the not so desirable duty of trailing Hillary Clinton during both of her failed presidential bids.
 
During that time, she was privy to some rather interesting behind-the-scenes conversations that took place between Hillary and her staffers.
 
Her new book, Chasing Hillary: Ten Years, Two Presidential Campaigns, and One Intact Glass Ceiling, she reveals some of those moments to the public.
 
The fact that Hillary was not well-liked by Americans was a point that was seemingly made time and time again by Hillary staffers.
 
You did not have to be present when Hillary made that statement to hear the frustration in her voice.
 
And, it was not apparent then, it surely was in her follow up comment.
 
Clinton said to no one in particular, “Oh, what’s the point? They’re never going to like me.”
 
Can’t Change People’s Minds
Even though Hillary knew people did not like her, she seemed content to just let it lie.
 
She had conceded there was nothing she would ever be able to do that could win over voters that did not already think favorably of her.
 
That same sentiment seemed to run through her campaign officers as well.
 
Podesta was quoted as saying, “I remember no one trusted Bill Clinton, and he won twice.”
 
As it would turn out, it was a colossal mistake on the part of her campaign to not work on her image more.
 
Do You Think Hillary’s ‘Unlikability’ Cost Her the Election?
Yes
No
Next
While Trump gradually won more people over and obviously won the election because of it, Hillary just continued to spin her wheels.
 
Her hubris got in the way of reality, thankfully, for all of us.



Report: Obama DOJ tried to end Clinton Foundation investigation – because of 2016 election
https://www.patriotnewsalerts.com/doj-end-clinton-investigation/?utm_medium=ci&utm_source=push&utm_campaign=pna
April 21, 2018
Report: Obama DOJ tried to end Clinton Foundation investigation – because of 2016 election
Image via Drop of Light / Shutterstock.com
Details within the Inspector General’s report on McCabe are going to take down more than the beleaguered former Deputy Director of the FBI.

Further details have revealed someone deep inside the Obama administration may have ordered the shut down of the investigation into the illegal activities of the Clinton Foundation.

The Proof
Liberals are already trying to call this conspiracy theory, but it is far from it.

The root of these accusations is there for everyone to see in the Inspector General’s report about the “lack of candor” by Andrew McCabe.

Within this report, McCabe gives details about being put under pressure by the Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General (PADAG) to drop the Clinton Foundation investigation.

Since that investigation was taking place during the presidential election, and Obama was obviously trying to protect his legacy, it makes perfect sense the administration wanted this to just “go away.”

The DOJ report stated, “According to McCabe, he pushed back, asking ‘are you telling me that I need to shut down a validly predicated investigation?’ McCabe told us that the conversation was ‘very dramatic’ and he never had a similar confrontation like the PADAG call with a high-level Department official in his entire FBI career.”

Every piece of documentation has been gone over by several legal experts, and they all came to the same conclusion:

Someone very high in the Justice Department had ordered the end to the Clinton Foundation investigation.

One legal expert, J. Christian Adams, who has experience operating in the Department of Justice Civil Rights Division, asked, “What kind of Justice Department do we have, that a couple weeks before the election, the presidential political appointees are calling the No. 2 guy at the FBI, essentially saying, give Hillary a pass?”

He emphasized, “That’s in the OIG report! That’s the real bombshell!”

Questions Need to be Answered
There are obviously a lot of questions that now need to be answered by the likes of Loretta Lynch and Barack Obama.

These are not questions they can just dismiss as right-wing rhetoric, either, but you know that is exactly what they will try to do.

Do You Think Obama Ordered This Investigation To Be Shut Down?
Yes
No
Next
This is a major scandal where someone must be held accountable.

Not only that, but an immediate and full investigation into the activities of the Clinton Foundation must be conducted, because it is quite apparent that did not happen the first time around.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 53157
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: If Hillary Goes Down So Will Obama

Post  Admin on Tue 17 Apr 2018, 10:06 pm

Bombshell: FBI covered up scandal involving both Hillary and Obama at the same time
January 22, 2018
https://www.conservativeinstitute.org/government-corruption/hillary-obama-scandal-fbi.htm?
Bombshell: FBI covered up scandal involving both Hillary and Obama at the same time
Marc Nozell / CCL
The Justice Department released a fresh batch of texts exchanged between top FBI agent Peter Strzok and FBI lawyer Lisa Page to Congress last week.

One of those messages mentions a notable omission in James Comey’s statement closing out the Clinton email probe. An earlier draft referred to emails exchanged between Clinton and former president Obama while Clinton was “on the territory of a hostile adversary,” but the reference to Obama was later changed to “senior government official,” and ultimately was omitted entirely.

It was revealed late last year that the language in Comey’s statement had been changed significantly from “grossly negligent” to “extremely careless” to exonerate Clinton of any wrongdoing. Comey’s original statement also said that it was “reasonably likely” that hostile hackers were able to access Clinton’s unsecured server, but was changed to “possible” in the final version.

FBI covered up Obama-Clinton exchange
The Justice Department provided 384 pages of texts to Congress on Friday. The newly released messages, dating from the spring and summer of 2016, mostly deal with the Clinton email probe.

Strzok, who worked on the Trump-Russia investigation before his dismissal over alleged anti-Trump bias, also worked on the Clinton email investigation.

One message mentions changes in Comey’s statement closing out the Clinton email probe. Earlier draft language mentioned that Clinton used her private server to email Obama while Clinton was “on the territory” of a hostile adversary. The reference to Obama was at first changed and then erased altogether.

The AP reports:

One of the messages references a change in language to Comey’s statement closing out the email case involving Clinton, Trump’s Democratic opponent in the 2016 presidential election.

While an earlier draft of the statement said Clinton and President Barack Obama had an email exchange while Clinton was “on the territory” of a hostile adversary, the reference to Obama was at first changed to “senior government official” and then omitted entirely in the final version.

This looks more than a little suspicious.

Five months of texts vanish
The FBI told Congress its system had failed to preserve five months of texts, ranging from Dec. 14, 2016, to May 17, 2017, the day Mueller was appointed to lead the investigation. The FBI blamed the vanished texts on “misconfiguration issues related to rollouts, provisioning, and software upgrades that conflicted with the FBI’s collection capabilities.”

But wait – there’s more.

Others texts suggest that Strzok and Page knew the outcome of the Clinton email probe before it was over. The two bemoaned the ill-timing of former Attorney General Loretta Lynch’s announcement that she would defer to the FBI’s conclusion on the case, which came just days after a meeting between Lynch and Bill Clinton aboard her plane in Phoenix.

“Timing looks like hell,” Strzok texted Page on July 1, 2016.

“Yeah, that is awful timing,” Page said, adding, “It’s a real profile in couragw [sic], since she knows no charges will be brought.”

Comey announced on July 5, 2016, that no charges would be brought against Clinton.

Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), chairman of the Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee, sent a letter to FBI Director Christopher Wray on Sunday asking for an explanation for the missing texts.

Meanwhile, Republicans have seized upon the texts, including the missing ones, to step up calls for a second, independent special counsel to investigate the FBI’s handling of the email probe. While Democrats describe Republicans’ criticism as an attempt to smear the FBI, it is getting harder to not connect the dots.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 53157
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: If Hillary Goes Down So Will Obama

Post  Admin on Fri 13 Apr 2018, 11:19 am

Judicial Watch sues State, Justice Departments for Uranium One documents
April 11, 2018
https://www.conservativeinstitute.org/political-corruption/foia-lawsuit-uranium-one.htm?Judicial Watch sues State, Justice Departments for Uranium One documents
JStone / Shutterstock.com
Hillary Clinton probably wants everyone to forget about the shadowy Uranium One deal she signed off on under the Barack Obama administration, but one watchdog group has other plans.

Judicial Watch announced on Tuesday that it filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the Justice and State Departments for all records pertaining to the Uranium One deal. The suit comes after the agencies failed to comply with previous record requests in December.

Judicial Watch sues for Uranium One docs
The watchdog group filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) suit in Washington on March 29. The lawsuit comes after the two agencies did not respond to a pair of similar requests on Dec. 22, 2017.

According to the press release, Judicial Watch asked the Justice Department for “all records regarding the company Uranium One (otherwise known as Uranium One, Inc. or SXR Uranium One, Inc.), including records of communication sent to and from officials in the offices of the Attorney General and Deputy Attorney General, Office of Legal Counsel, and the National Security Division from January 20, 2009 through December 31, 2013.”

Meanwhile, the State Department was asked to produce:

Any records relating to the company Uranium One (otherwise known as Uranium One, Inc. or SXR Uranium One, Inc.), including records of communication sent to and from officials in the Office of the Secretary of State, Office of the Legal Advisor, Office of the Under Secretary for Arms Control and International Security Affairs, Office of Arms Control, Verification and Compliance, Office of International Security and Nonproliferation, and the Office of Political-Military Affairs from January 20, 2009 through December 31, 2013.

The president of Judicial Watch was hopeful that the suits would bring the “Uranium One cover-up” to an end.

“It is simply remarkable that Judicial Watch had to sue the State and Justice Departments in federal court for basic information about the shady Uranium One deal,” Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said. He added:

It seems Judicial Watch has done more to investigate the Clinton-Russia connections than the Justice Department, even as DOJ resources are spent on supporting Mueller’s massive investigation into the fanciful Clinton Dossier-inspired [Donald] Trump-Russia conspiracy theory. We hope the Uranium One cover-up ends thanks to these lawsuits.

Should Hillary Clinton be held accountable for her crimes?
Yes
No
Next
Conflicts of interest
Judicial Watch is currently investigating the controversial 2010 Uranium One deal that Clinton signed off on, along with other eight other officials who sat on the Committee on Foreign Investments in the United States (CFIUS), which must approve business deals that carry implications for American national security.

The national security risk in this case stemmed from the fact that Russia’s state-owned nuclear company, Rosatom, was looking to buy Canadian mining company Uranium One, which controlled 20 percent of America’s uranium.

Conflicts of interest cropped up when it was revealed that entities connected to Uranium One donated millions to the Clinton Foundation. Former President Bill Clinton also gave a $500,00 speech sponsored by Renaissance Capital, a Russian investment firm connected to the deal, in Moscow in June 2010.

According to the New York Times, the Clintons did not disclose the cash that started flowing into their foundation as the deal went through.

The Times reported:

As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation.

Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.

On top of that, the Justice Department was investigating officials in Russia’s nuclear sector before the deal went through, but apparently, nobody in the Justice Department alerted Congress or the public. The Hill reported:

Rather than bring immediate charges in 2010, however, the Department of Justice (DOJ) continued investigating the matter for nearly four more years, essentially leaving the American public and Congress in the dark about Russian nuclear corruption on U.S. soil during a period when the Obama administration made two major decisions benefiting Putin’s commercial nuclear ambitions.

It’s about time someone called the Clintons out on the corruption. The Clintons have to be held accountable, and if the Justice Department won’t hand over the records voluntarily, a lawsuit may be the only way.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 53157
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: If Hillary Goes Down So Will Obama

Post  Admin on Fri 13 Apr 2018, 10:21 am

Hillary Clinton blames loss on NRA, NRA fires back: ‘You’re exactly right’
April 10, 2018
https://www.conservativeinstitute.org/conservative-news/hillary-clinton-nra-loss.htm?
Hillary Clinton blames loss on NRA, NRA fires back: ‘You’re exactly right’
https://www.conservativeinstitute.org/conservative-news/hillary-clinton-nra-loss.htm
Hillary Clinton continues to humiliate herself by dredging up excuses for her surprise loss to Donald Trump. In what could easily be mistaken for a self-parody, Clinton has insisted that Russian President Vladimir Putin, former FBI Director James Comey, white supremacy, misogyny, and even submissive housewives were responsible for the shellacking she took on Nov. 8, 2016.

But Clinton may have finally gotten something right by crediting gun owners for her campaign’s failure. The National Rifle Association blasted Clinton’s latest “sob story” by pointing out that she was, indeed, “exactly right” to blame the “hard work and dedication” of “nearly six million” NRA members for her loss.
“It’s the NRA, stupid”
The NRA was responding to Clinton’s most recent tantrum — this time at New York’s elitist, ladies-only clubhouse known as The Wing — where she gave a familiar speech echoing the same outrageous themes first presented in her campaign blame-all book, What Happened. As her monologue drifted from subject to victimized subject, Clinton insisted that a massive Russia-Trump conspiracy stole the election from her, before lamenting how the president “decimated” the State Department that she worked to fill with liberal bureaucrats.
Is it time for Hillary Clinton to go away?
Yes
No
Next
Although Clinton couldn’t be further detached from reality, she did make one solid point. Referencing the more than $20 million that the NRA spent on educating the public about her strict gun control stance, Clinton said, “You know the NRA has spent more money on me than any other candidate,” before quipping, “We’ll find out if any of that was Russian money.”
NRATV, the media arm of the gun advocacy group, thankful for the publicity from Mrs. Clinton, tweeted a fiery video response from firearms enthusiast and gun rights defender Grant Stinchfield. Watch below:
NRATV

@NRATV
 “@HillaryClinton here's where your sob story gets real. That the reason you lost was because of the #NRA. You’re exactly right. Spot on & thank you for the acknowledgment of the nearly 6 million members’ hard work & dedication to get @realDonaldTrump elected.” -@stinchfield1776

8:34 PM - Apr 5, 2018
637
308 people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy
Before going after the pantsuit-wearing pol, however, Stinchfield defended the Trump administration’s successes:

Truthfully, I thought I was done with this woman years ago, but even after suffering her most humiliating loss in modern history, Hillary Clinton continues to return again and again and again. Yes, with the economy booming and ISIS all but destroyed, with Americans getting the tax cuts they deserve, [and] with Neil Gorsuch on the Supreme Court, Hillary Clinton lashed out claiming “America is in a really bad spot.”

Tell me, Hillary, were we doing better when your husband’s failed leadership caused two American soldiers to be dragged through the streets of Somalia? Were we in a “good spot” when you lied about Benghazi? Was America better off when Loretta Lynch met with your husband on a plane to discuss your crimes? When James Comey, Andrew McCabe and corrupted FBI officials refused to prosecute you, were you making anything better? You were making America vulnerable is what you were doing.

Pity party
Calling Clinton’s latest speech a “#MeToo pity session,” Stinchfield mocked Clinton’s excuses and deflections, arguing that Clinton has succumbed to a “post-deplorable delusional state.” 

For example, Mrs. Clinton believes that the “lock her up” chants that Trump supporters spontaneously invoke are a sign of sexism. “They’re still chanting it,” Clinton told the room full of Democratic women.

But Clinton is blind to her own misogyny. Asking Clinton to “pick up a copy of the Ken Starr Report,” Stinchfield explained:

Your entire career was built on the pillars of sexism and misogyny. You linked yourself to a powerful man and ride your way all the way to the top, all the whole beings escorted by armed drivers and guards for the past three decades. The millions of women you called “deplorables” drove their kids to school before driving themselves to work, and you want those women disarmed. The truth is, you want all of us disarmed.

Certainly, Clinton inspired “trepidation” in NRA members during the presidential race, explaining why the NRA spent so much to oppose her. The liberal millionaire demanded draconian background checks which ignored due process and a complete ban on so-called assault rifles — stances that clearly alarmed many Americans.

With a Supreme Court vacancy waiting to be filled by the next president, the NRA treated that election with the urgency it deserved. Stinchfield explained:

But Hillary Clinton, here is where your sob story gets real. The reason you lost was because of the NRA. You know what? You’re exactly right. Spot on! And thank you for the acknowledgment of the nearly six million members, of all their hard work and dedication to get Donald Trump elected. Because when you compare them — us — to the Iranians and communists, when you proposed Australian-style gun confiscation programs, assault weapons bans, when you called all of us “deplorables” we rallied together to send you packing.

#MeToo Meltdown
Stinchfield slammed the “political machine consisting of high-priced anti-gun hacks” which Clinton utilized to oppose the NRA. The former New York senator spent $1.2 billion to lose the election to Trump, who spent just half of that sum. Clinton collected truck-loads of cash from big banks to finance her doomed campaign — contributions that make the NRA’s donations look like a mere pittance.

The bottom line is that ordinary U.S. citizens rose up to take back the country from the political elite, connected by a sense of urgency to protect their right to self defense. “We rose up, took back the truth and defended our Second Amendment, and we fought for every freedom you sought to take away,” Stinchfield said. “So, the next time you have a meltdown about why you’re not president, remember this, Hillary Clinton: it’s the NRA, stupid.”
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 53157
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: If Hillary Goes Down So Will Obama

Post  Admin on Sat 07 Apr 2018, 6:27 pm

Hillary Clinton throws pity party: ‘Fox News is always trying to impeach me’
https://www.conservativeinstitute.org/conservative-news/hillary-impeach-fox-news.htm?
April 5, 2018
Hillary Clinton throws pity party: ‘Fox News is always trying to impeach me’
Image Source: YouTube
For the life of her, twice-failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton cannot figure out why on earth Republicans would want to dredge up her ignominious past. Speaking to a friendly New York audience earlier this week, the self-pitying former secretary of state lamented, “Fox News is always trying to impeach me” even though, she added, “that doesn’t apply to a private citizen.”

Impeachment-proof
Clinton, who styles herself as part of “the resistance,” an informal collection of left-wing dissidents who refuse to recognize the authority of the duly elected president of the United States, can’t understand why she continues to garner attention from conservative media sources. Clinton told her supporters that she finds all of the public scrutiny disheartening:

Fox News is always trying to impeach me, so somebody needs to tell them, that doesn’t apply to a private citizen. When you’ve been accused of everything like I have, and you realize some people believe it, it’s really depressing.

Hillary apparently labors under the assumption that all of her (too often criminal) past deeds should be forgotten or forgiven simply because she lost the presidential election. On top of that being simply wrong, it doesn’t take into account the fact that in a binary election, she would have been the President but for Trump’s unexpected victory, and her past would have created enormous political issues.

As an outspoken critic of the Trump administration who completed a book tour last summer blaming an exhaustive list of international personalities and social forces for her 2016 electoral defeat, Clinton isn’t going to get a pass from conservatives.

However, it isn’t just her graceless defeat that has created so much contempt for the former first lady among Republicans.

Lock her up already!
Clinton is the subject of several very real investigations following a number of developments that have come to light since Trump was elected and her Democratic patron left the White House. Her status as a private citizen won’t afford Clinton any legal protection from what is coming.

Should Hillary Clinton be held accountable?
Yes
No
Next
On Nov. 14, 2017, the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform opened an investigation seeking answers to why Clinton’s State Department approved the sale of a significant portion of U.S. uranium reserves to a Russian energy firm engaged in kickbacks, bribery, extortion and money laundering. Clinton’s agency was part of a board that approved the sale of 20 percent of America’s uranium reserves despite warnings from concerned officials.

FBI agents in Little Rock, Arkansas have interviewed at least one witness so far after the Justice Department launched a new inquiry to determine whether the Clinton Foundation engaged in any pay-to-play politics while she served as secretary of state.

The investigation will examine if Clinton promised any foreign powers favorable “government outcomes” in exchange for donations to her charity.

After pressure from the White House to determine what happened to as many as 33,000 “deleted” and “acid-washed” emails from Clinton’s unauthorized server, the DOJ is once again taking a look at an FBI investigation that formally ended in July of 2016.

Officials familiar with this renewed inquiry have alleged that Attorney General Jeff Sessions will be examining just how much classified information went over Clinton’s server, as well as reviewing the Obama-era investigation for any flaws or inconsistencies.

Clinton feeling the pressure
Clinton acknowledged the pressure from these criminal and ethical probes during this week’s conference. Without citing any specific examples, she said, “I’ve really been admiring the staying power of the resistance because it’s hard when you are fighting on so many fronts.”

The former first lady is right to be worried. Although Clinton won’t be impeached, the stakes are even higher for a private citizen subject to criminal proceedings for a long list of offenses.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 53157
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: If Hillary Goes Down So Will Obama

Post  Admin on Sun 01 Apr 2018, 11:54 pm

Whistleblower Says Obama Could Have Stopped Russian ‘Meddling,’ Did Nothing
March 28, 2018
Whistleblower Says Obama Could Have Stopped Russian ‘Meddling,’ Did Nothing
Image via ChameleonsEye / Shutterstock.com
Just how much blame falls with the Obama administration for the Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election?

According to former staffer Brett Bruen, Obama not only knew about the meddling, he did absolutely nothing to stop it.

Who is Brett Bruen
Bruen was the Director of Global Engagement from 2013-2015.

According to Bruen, the entire Obama administration was warned about the possibility of Russian meddling in 2014, but he was ignored.

His hypothesis was not unfounded, either.

Bruen looked at how the Russians had already wrecked elections in the Ukraine.

How They Did It
During the 2014 election in the Ukraine, the Russians more or less created the very same plan that was allegedly used here in the United States.

They had an all-out attack via social media and used propaganda to allegedly point the election in the direction they wanted.

A task force had been assembled to find out exactly what took place during that election.

When the task force, of which Bruen was part of, started cranking out fact sheets and video detailing the Russians actions, the Russians pulled back their efforts in the Ukraine election.

The Warning
Bruen stated, “I was sitting in the Situation Room saying, ‘Why do we continue to look at this as an issue that only concerns the Ukraine, that only concerns Eastern Europe.’”

“This is something that’s going to march across Western Europe. This is something that’s going to march over to our shores, and we need to be ready,” Bruen continued.

Funding Denied
Even with the warning, any effort to stop the Russians from doing the same thing here would have needed significant funding.

Sadly, the Obama administration chose to ignore Bruen as well as thinking the Russians would not dare try to do something like that in a United States election.

Now, think about that for second…

Obama’s administration had no problem assembling a task force to investigate another country’s election, yet no funding could be found to protect an election on our home soil.

Was this because Obama possibly knew one of the candidates of choice for the Russians was Bernie Sanders?

Do You Think the Russian Meddling is Obama’s Fault?
Yes
No
Next
Or maybe it was just that the administration was looking for a ready-made excuse for the eventual Hillary Clinton loss.

Either way, it is time for Jeff Sessions to open the book on the Obama administration and bring everyone involved in the deception of the American people to justice!
https://www.patriotnewsalerts.com/obama-did-nothing/?utm_source=boomtrain&utm_medium=automated&utm_campaign=cna1&utm_source=boomtrain&utm_medium=automated&utm_campaign=cna1





avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 53157
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: If Hillary Goes Down So Will Obama

Post  Admin on Mon 26 Mar 2018, 10:21 pm

Rush Limbaugh accuses Rod Rosenstein of exonerating Hillary Clinton in Whitewater scandal
https://www.conservativeinstitute.org/government-corruption/rush-limbaugh-accuses-rosenstein.htm?utm_source=boomtrain&utm_medium=NS1&utm_campaign=1522006334409&utm_source=boomtrain&utm_medium=NS1&utm_campaign=1522006334310
March 23, 2018

Rush Limbaugh accuses Rod Rosenstein of exonerating Hillary Clinton in Whitewater scandal
Image Source: Screenshot
In 2017, the Democrats successfully lobbied Attorney General Jeff Sessions to recuse himself from the investigation into alleged Russian interference because of his ties to the Donald Trump campaign and a pair of short, chance encounters he had with a Russian diplomat. As a result, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein was tapped to replace Sessions, and oversee the special counsel’s investigation into allegations that Trump colluded with the Russian government during the 2016 presidential race.

However, it turns out that — with Rosenstein’s blessing — Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation has since evolved into an unrestrained “fishing expedition” desperately searching for any misconduct to discredit the Trump administration — and syndicated conservative talk show host Rush Limbaugh knows exactly why. On the Tuesday broadcast of his radio program, Limbaugh pointed out Rosenstein’s scurrilous ties to the Clinton family and accused the deputy AG of “clearing Hillary” Clinton in the Whitewater scandal.

Friends in low places
In the months leading up to the 2016 presidential election, former secretary of State Hillary Clinton relied upon her friends in Washington to exonerate her for disseminating classified information over an unauthorized personal server.

Americans have since learned that FBI Director James Comey drafted a memo pardoning Clinton months before interviewing as many as 16 key witnesses in the case — including the prime suspect herself.

Additionally, an email intercepted between disgraced FBI paramours Peter Strzok and Lisa Page indicated that then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch knew in advance that Clinton would be pardoned — perhaps explaining the motive behind a mysterious Phoenix, Arizona tarmac meeting between Bill Clinton and Lynch days before the exoneration was formally announced.

Hillary Clinton’s troubling email server usage was not the only scandal from which she escaped unscathed. Clinton received a similar treatment from federal investigators and prosecutors during the various scandals that emerged during independent counsel Kenneth Starr’s long-running Whitewater investigation in the 90’s.

Limbaugh explained Rosenstein’s ties to this probe in his recent program:

It turns out that Rosenstein worked as a Whitewater prosecutor. … This guy was on the prosecution team of Whitewater, which, of course, found the Clintons had done nothing… I mean, you talk about incestuous.

Rosenstein himself interrogated Hillary Clinton on Jan. 14, 1998, in a speedy interview that lasted just 15 minutes. Later, he was appointed by former President Bill Clinton to work for the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Maryland.

The truth comes out
Rosenstein’s wife also has connections to the Clintons, Limbaugh explained:

Rosenstein’s wife then represented Bill Clinton shortly after Rod Rosenstein cleared Hillary in the Whitewater thing.

Rosenstein’s wife is Lisa Barsoomian, and she represented then-President Bill Clinton in a 1998-99 civil case in federal court.

Barsoomian represented Clinton in a civil case filed by Wyoming candidate and political activist Al Hamburg, filed just months after Rosenstein’s interview of the first lady.

Should Hillary Clinton be prosecuted for her crimes?
Yes
No
Next
“Washington hillbillies”
Limbaugh says these intimate political ties should disqualify Rosenstein from overseeing the special counsel investigation. He concluded:

In a way, Washington is like the hillbillies in the mountains. Everybody’s related to everybody. It’s a gigantic revolving door, and they all know each other, and they all work or are married to each other, and they work for the same people over and over and over again.

And this to me is further evidence why this guy, Rosenstein, ought not have any role in the Trump administration at all because the Trump administration is there to drain the swamp, not to promote it.

With Rosenstein in charge of Mueller, a partisan, Clinton loyalist has allowed the special counsel’s investigation to extend far beyond its original mandate of exploring Russia’s ties to the Trump team. Limbaugh noted, “Justice Department regulations require that a crime be named and that that is what the special counsel shall pursue,” although it appears that Mueller has been awarded “free rein” to explore Trump’s business relationships and his ties to just about everyone.

Limbaugh also argued that if the special counsel “encounters something else that is not within the purview of the crime being investigated, he’s gotta go back to the person that appointed him and seek permission to add this newly discovered crime to the investigation.”

However, the conservative pundit observed, “None of that has happened. Mueller has been given free rein by Rod Rosenstein.”
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 53157
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: If Hillary Goes Down So Will Obama

Post  Admin on Fri 23 Mar 2018, 9:42 pm

Report: Obama Used His Power to Help His Friends’ Businesses
March 22, 2018
Report: Obama Used His Power to Help His Friends’ Businesses
Image via Lacy Landre / CCL
We know establishment politicians are corrupt, that is just a gimme in today’s political world.

But, when you have a president that says he is cracking down on the corruption but is actually feeding his friends coffers, well, that just needs to be exposed… and it is exactly what Obama was allegedly doing, according to Lou Dobbs.

Obama Administration Creating Stock Crashes
For most of us, the news a school is or is not included in the GI Bill of Rights is not really all that big of a deal.

However, this is exactly what Peter Schweizer is claiming the Obama Administration did to help out his buddies.

The scam is very simple, but brilliant at the same time.

By excluding and including schools where benefits could be used, Obama and company created momentary crashes to take advantage of for investors.

No, Then Yes
The example Schweizer used was the University of Phoenix.

You have no doubt seen the for-profit university’s commercials on TV.

The administration says the school is no longer supported by the bill, which causes a massive crash.

Obama’s buddy Marty Nesbitt swings in and buys as much stock on the school as he can get his hands on.

Soon after, the administration changes its tune and says the school is now acceptable, causing the stock to blow up, creating a huge profit for Obama’s buddy Nesbitt.

‘It Was Rampant’
According to Schweizer, this was typical of the Obama administration

Schweizer stated, “And that pattern is repeated over and over again in other sectors of the economy. It was rampant.”

Should the Justice Department Open an Investigation on Obama?
Yes
No
Next
If this was true, it is one of the most blatant abuses of power in the history of our country.

Our Justice Department needs to immediately open an investigation into this and once and for all bring justice against Barack H. Obama.

https://www.conservativeinstitute.org/conservative-news/melania-responds-to-critics.htm?Melania Trump responds to her critics at
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 53157
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: If Hillary Goes Down So Will Obama

Post  Admin on Wed 21 Mar 2018, 5:27 pm

Leaked: Clinton/Facebook Document Exposed… Media Narrative Destroyed
https://www.usapoliticstoday.org/clinton-facebook-document-destroyed/
By Gary Maher - March 21, 20180156
Another attack on the Trump presidency is turning into an embarrassment for Democrats.

Since The New York Times report on Saturday that a company with ties to Donald Trump’s presidential campaign had mined the personal information of millions of Facebook users, the media and Capitol Hill have been filled with more accusations about undercover help Trump got before the 2016 vote.

But internal Hillary Clinton campaign emails being published by WikiLeaks show the real scandal is just starting to come out – and the real villains are Democrats and the Hillary campaign, again.

Since the reports about the Trump-linked Cambridge Analytica first appeared, reports have already surfaced that Facebook allowed the Barack Obama re-election campaign wide access to user data back in 2012.

But emails released by WikiLeaks show just how closely Facebook was working with the Hillary Clinton campaign in 2016.

An email exchange between Clinton campaign manager John Podesta and Sheryl Sandberg, Facebook’s chief operating officer, makes it clear the two were political soulmates, dedicated to a Hillary Clinton victory.

“Wishing you a happy new year,” Podesta wrote on Jan. 2, 2016. “2015 was challenging, but we ended in a good place thanks to your help and support. Look forward to working with you to help elect the first woman president of the United States.” (emphasis added)

That might have been a form letter Podesta sent to anyone with an email address on file with Hillary’s campaign. But this is the chief operations officer of Facebook. Imagine if Democrats could find an email from the Trump campaign thanking a heavy-hitter like Sandberg “for your help and support.”

Sandberg’s response was definitely not a form letter.

“I am thrilled at the progress Hillary is making,” Sandberg wrote. “… Onward to a new year and hopefully health and happiness for you and your family.”

Previous emails between the two also show this was not merely a polite exchange between acquaintances. WikiLeaks released a lengthy August 2015 email from Sandberg to Podesta proposing a meeting between Podesta and Facebook co-founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg.

“He wants to meet folks who can inform his understanding about effective political operations to advance public policy goals on social oriented objectives (like immigration, education or basic scientific research),” Sandberg wrote.

(Meanwhile, according to The Hill, lawmakers from both parties want Zuckerberg to appear to answer questions about the 2016 campaign. It’s a good chance some of those questions won’t be what Democrats are expecting.)

And in a June email thanking Podesta for his condolences over the accidental death of Sandberg’s husband, Dave, Sandberg made her political preferences as clear as any corrupt FBI agent.

“And I still want HRC to win badly,” Steinberg wrote. “I am still here to help as I can. She came over and was magical with my kids.”

That’s in response to a note of condolence? Clearly, Steinberg wasn’t letting a little thing like the death of her spouse diminish her passion for politics.

Here’s the thing. So many attacks against Donald Trump and his administration have been turned back on the Democrats that they look like fools for trying.

When the website BuzzFeed published the “Trump dossier” in its entirety even before the inauguration, Democrats and the media hoped it would destroy Trump’s nascent presideny. Instead, the country learned what the Clinton campaign was capable of.

Russia collusion? Not a shred of evidence against Team Trump has become public, but boy did we learn a lot about how Hillary sold out the country with that Uranium One deal.

Trump is accused of attacking the FBI and politicizing law enforcement? Turns out the FBI and the Justice Department were lying to federal judges to obtain surveillance warrants for a Trump campaign volunteer that could well have let the Obama administration spy on the Trump campaign itself.

Now, the media narrative appears to be shifting in the direction that Facebook was in cahoots with the Trump campaign because its users’ data was mined by a company with ties to Trump, and this is somehow wrong.

But the leaked documents show Facebook was in bed with the Clinton campaign going back to when she was still stealing the nomination from Vermont socialist Bernie Sanders.

Really, you’d think they’d have stopped trying by now. The real story behind Facebook and the Clinton campaign is coming out, which will make the Cambridge Analytica story just another media narrative that’s been destroyed. But America started catching on a long time ago.

What do you think this will do to the Democrats’ latest attack on Trump? Scroll down to comment below!
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 53157
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: If Hillary Goes Down So Will Obama

Post  Admin on Tue 20 Mar 2018, 5:56 pm

https://www.usapoliticstoday.org/person-promised-dirt-hillary-clinton-mysteriously-disappears-thin-air-details/
Person Who Promised ‘Dirt’ on Hillary Clinton Mysteriously Disappears Into Thin Air [DETAILS]
By Zack Jefferson - March 19, 20180141
When Bill and Hillary Clinton have a problem, that problem often seems to disappear.

Joseph Misfud was alleged to have ‘dirt’ on Hillary. Now, he’s gone – POOF!

Hmmmm.

Check it out…

From Daily Wire:
The man at the center of a key allegation in the Russian investigation has suddenly “vanished,” according to a new report by CNN. Joseph Mifsud, the academic who supposedly promised former Trump campaign aide George Papadopoulos some “dirt” on Hillary Clinton from Russian sources via leaked emails, “has gone to ground” after publicly denying that he had ever “spoke of secrets regarding Hillary Clinton.”

“Last Thursday [Mifsud] disappeared from the private university in Rome where he teaches,” CNN reports. “Repeated attempts to reach him since have been unsuccessful, though he appears to have read some messages from CNN.”

In its report, CNN details Mifsud’s sketchy dealings, which include several false and exaggerated claims about his own status and connections, and warnings from his associate “about the danger of being played by the Russians.”

Mifsud became a central figure in the Russia investigation after being identified by Papadopoulos as “Foreign Contact 1,” the man with Russian connections that enticed him with offers of damaging information on Clinton. CNN reports:

In the US affidavit, Papadopoulos claims that Mifsud told him in April 2016 that the Russians had “thousands of emails” relating to Hillary Clinton.

Joseph Mifsud met with the Russian ambassador to the UK Alexander Yakovenko in May 2014.

An associate also told CNN that he repeatedly bragged about how Moscow had “compromising material” on the Clinton campaign in spring 2016, contradicting Mifsud’s assertion that he never talked about Russian “dirt” on the Democratic presidential bid.

More, via Western Journalism:

The account was corroborated by Mifsud in an interview last week with Italian newspaper La Repubblica, in which he referred to a discussion held with the FBI.

During the interview with the newspaper, Mifsud refuted the claim regarding the Clinton emails that Papadopoulos made in the affidavit.

“I absolutely exclude the fact that I spoke of secrets regarding Hillary Clinton,” Mifsud said.

Those were the last words Mifsud spoke in public about the subject, with CNN suggesting that the professor’s past actions are coming back full circle.

“Mifsud’s history of exaggerations, and his enthusiasm to be seen as an important player in demand at conferences the world over, may now be coming back to haunt him.”

How does a man associated with the Clintons suddenly disappear?

Any guesses?
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 53157
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

FBI Informant in ‘Uranium One’ Scandal Drops DEVASTATING Info Against Obama (Details)

Post  Admin on Mon 19 Mar 2018, 8:15 pm

https://www.usapoliticstoday.org/informant-uranium-one-scandal-drops-devastating-info-obama-details/
FBI Informant in ‘Uranium One’ Scandal Drops DEVASTATING Info Against Obama (Details)
By Zack Jefferson - March 19, 20180182
Douglas Campbell, the FBI’s informant in the “Uranium One” scandal, gave written testimony to three Congressional committees.

He accuses the Obama administration of aiding the Russians in their attempt to gain power and influence over the United States.

Kind of a big deal.

Here’s the scoop…

From Daily Wire:

The informant, Douglas Campbell, told congressional investigators on Wednesday that Moscow sent millions of dollars to the U.S. with the expectation that it would benefit the Clintons, while Hillary Clinton “quarterbacked a ‘reset’ in US-Russian relations” in her role as Secretary of State during the Obama administration, The Hill reported.

Campbell said: “I was frustrated watching the U.S. government make numerous decisions benefiting Rosatom and Tenex while those entities were engaged in serious criminal conduct on U.S. soil. Tenex and Rosatom were raking in billions of U.S. dollars by signing contracts with American nuclear utility clients at the same time they were indulging in extortion by using threats to get bribes and kickbacks, with a portion going to Russia for high ranking officials.”

Campbell also added: “I remember one response I got from an agent when I asked how it was possible CFIUS would approve the Uranium One sale when the FBI could prove Rosatom was engaged in criminal conduct. His answer: ‘Ask your politics.”

Here are a bunch of key facts:

Campbell participated in closed-door interviews with the Senate Judiciary, House Intelligence and House Oversight and Government Reform committees.

-Campbell said that Russian nuclear officials told him that Moscow hired an American lobbying firm, APCO Worldwide, because it was in a unique position to influence the Obama administration, Hillary Clinton in particular.

-Democrats are aggressively trying to discredit him but are having little success as “the FBI found Campbell’s undercover work valuable enough to reward him with a $50,000 check in 2016.”

-Campbell says that the FBI told him that his work was “briefed to President Obama as part of his daily presidential briefing,” which would mean that Obama was aware of the crimes committed by the Russian officials.

-The FBI forced him to pay $500,000 of his own money to Russian officials as bribes to facilitate his cover, and the bureau never reimbursed him despite their praise of his work and the fact that the ordeal was so stressful that he developed serious, life-threatening illnesses.

Fox News
✔️
@FoxNews
"You always follow the money and you find out that the #Clinton Foundation...always seems to be involved in these messy, murky deals."  - Former member of @FBI Joint Terrorism Task Force Steve Rogers

9:25 AM - Feb 8, 2018
2,320
1,612 people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy
Sara A. Carter has more:

It wasn’t until years later in 2015 that American businessman Daren Condrey, whose company Transportation Logistics International, plead guilty to conspiring to violate the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) and conspiring to commit wire fraud, according to the DOJ.

Russian national Vadim Mikerin, who was a top official of the Russian nuclear arms subsidiary Tenex and would later become president of Tenam the American subsidiary of Rosatom, was also sentenced in December 2015. Mikerin, who only plead guilty to money laundering, was arrested for a racketeering scheme that dated back to 2004. He was sentenced to 48 months in prison.

Continued:

Boris Rubizhevsky, another Russian national from New Jersey, who was president of the security firm NEXGEN Security, was also involved in the conspiracy and plead guilty to conspiracy to commit money laundering in 2015. He served as a consultant to Tenam and to Mikerin. Rubizhevsky was sentenced to prison last year along with three years of supervised release and a $26,500 fine, according to a recent Reuters report.

And Mark Lambert, 54, a co-owner of Transportation Logistics International, was charged this month on an “11-count indictment with one count of conspiracy to violate the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) and to commit wire fraud, seven counts of violating the FCPA, two counts of wire fraud and one count of international promotion money laundering,” as stated in the DOJ press release. Lambert’s charges stem from an alleged scheme to bribe Mikerin in order to secure contracts with TENEX, according to the DOJ release.

YIKES!
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 53157
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: If Hillary Goes Down So Will Obama

Post  Admin on Wed 14 Mar 2018, 9:09 pm

Hillary Clinton says Trump won ‘backwards’ voters who don’t like ‘black people’ – while on foreign soil
March 13, 2018
Hillary Clinton says Trump won ‘backwards’ voters who don’t like ‘black people’ – while on foreign soil
Image via Foreign and Commonwealth Office / CCL
Hillary Clinton has continued her delusions since she was defeated by President Donald Trump in the 2016 presidential election.

This week the former Democrat presidential candidate was in India, on foreign ground, deriding conservatives and others who voted for President Trump.

Deplorables Part Two.
Clinton told her audience that the people who voted for president Trump are sexists, racists and backwards people who, apparently, are too dumb to realize that voting for her was what was in their best interests.

“His whole campaign: ‘Make America Great Again’ was looking backwards,” she told the audience at India Today: Conclave 2018. “You know, ‘You didn’t like black people getting rights? You don’t like women, you know, getting jobs? You don’t want to, you know, see that Indian American succeeding more than you are? Whatever your problem is — I’m going to solve it.”

As if calling people deplorables was not enough of a slap in the face.

She said that America did not deserve the punishment that is President Trump.

“The person who is the most outrageous, the person who says the politically incorrect things, the person who is insulting and attacking drives big ratings. And I think part of what happened in the election is almost an attraction that many people had to the role that was being played by him as a candidate for president,” she said.

Women Are Not Smart.
Part of Clinton’s strategy for winning people to her team is telling women that they are slaves to their husbands and do what they are told.

“We do not do well with white men and we don’t do well with married, white women,” she said. “And part of that is an identification with the Republican Party, and a sort of ongoing pressure to vote the way that your husband, your boss, your son, whoever, believes you should.”

And if you voted for President Trump, according to Clinton, you are a relic of the past.

“I won the places that represent two-thirds of America’s gross domestic product,” Clinton said. “So I won the places that are optimistic, diverse, dynamic, moving forward,” she said.

She lost the election, wrote a book explaining why, and gave every reason other than herself.

Should Hillary Clinton Be Arrested For Her Crimes?
YES
NO
Next
Then she went on a tour of the United States telling people why she did not win the election and, again, it was not her fault.

And now she is taking her “poor me” tour internationally.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 53157
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: If Hillary Goes Down So Will Obama

Post  Admin on Wed 14 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm

Navy sailor pardoned by Trump says Obama used him as ‘scapegoat’
March 11, 2018
Navy sailor pardoned by Trump says Obama used him as ‘scapegoat’
Image via s_bukley / Shutterstock.com
A Navy sailor prosecuted by former President Obama’s administration has plenty to say about how he was treated by the 44th president.

Kristian Saucier, who was pardoned last week by President Donald Trump, said that President Obama used him to take heat off of Hillary Clinton to pave the way for her to become president.

Pardon Me.
Saucier was prosecuted and convicted of national security violations because he took pictures aboard a Navy submarine, but he believes he was really prosecuted to protect Clinton, who wanted to be president.

“The president has pardoned Kristian Saucier, a navy submariner. Mr. Saucier was 22 years old at the time of his offences and has served out his 12-month sentence. He has been recognized by his fellow service-members for his dedication, skill and patriotic spirit. The president is appreciative of Mr. Saucier’s service to the country,” Press Secretary Sarah Sanders during a daily press briefing last week.

Saucier spoke to Fox News reporter Pete Hegseth after his pardon and spoke of being grateful for having his life back.

“We’re very grateful to the president for following through with his promise to help our family out. He is an amazing man and this is just one of the many great things that he’s done in his term. You know, I got to speak with him briefly yesterday and what an amazing guy. Just to be able to take time out of his busy schedule to speak with me and to turn my family’s life around and give us our lives back,” he said.

The Forgotten Man.
Hegseth mentioned that Saucier had felt like a forgotten man until President Trump took action.

“Well, I was at work as a garbage man and my wife texted me and said ‘you’ve been pardoned’ and I kind of thought she was messing with me,” Saucier said. “so I said ‘okay, yeah, sure,’ and then she sent me a picture of the actual signed pardon and I couldn’t believe it.”

“Well its obviously been for somebody like myself whose, you know, patriotic and all I wanted to do was serve my country and I honestly believe the systems that went after me were put in place to protect people like me until I was run through the ringer,” he said. “And it’s unfortunate because, you know, I still love this country. It’s still the greatest country in the world and I believe president is taking it back to that place where it needs to be.

“But you know, it’s unfortunate that one prosecutor and a couple FBI agents really just destroyed my life for no reason,” he said. “This case could have been handled at a much lower level within the military, as it should have been, because I was active duty at the time and I would have taken my punishment the same way — like a man. I made a mistake when I was a young kid, it was a misguided attempt to have some mementos, and it should have never reached the level like it did. And I believe President Trump saw that and he spoke about my case.”

Do You Want President Obama Prosecuted?
YES
NO
CONFIRM VOTE
Why does he think he was prosecuted? Hillary Clinton.
“It was a clear attempt by the Department of Justice… under Obama to use me as a scapegoat to take the heat off Hillary Clinton for mishandling classified information,” he said.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 53157
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: If Hillary Goes Down So Will Obama

Post  Admin on Wed 14 Mar 2018, 12:28 am

WATCH: Hillary Slips Down The Stairs TWICE While Bashing Trump & America In India
https://www.usapoliticstoday.org/video-hillary-slips-stairs-twice-bashing-trump-america-india/
By Zack Jefferson - March 13, 20180133
Hillary Clinton has proven time and again she wasn’t healthy enough to be president.

Everyone remembers the video of her fainting spell on 9/11 right before the 2016 general election.

While bashing President Trump and America overseas in India the other day, super-healthy Hillary nearly slipped down a flight of stairs – twice!

WATCH:
From Daily Caller:

Hillary Clinton reportedly tripped down a flight of stairs twice in India Monday, requiring the help of two aides to make it down , according to a video obtained by the American Mirror.

Hillary Clinton nearly falls down stairs in India -- twice!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=1&v=Rbp3yne4h_4&ab_channel=TheAmericanMirror


Clinton is in the country to participate in the India Today Conclave, where she claimed President Donald Trump only won the election because he go the support of people she famously called “deplorables.”

Clinton was attempting to walk down a flight of stairs without a railing when she nearly went down, twice.

More from Townhall, on Clinton in India:

During an event in Mumbai, India with Bollywood stars, Hillary Clinton was reportedly introduced as the “woman who should have been the president of the United States of America” and she told those gathered that America “did not deserve” President Trump.

She was asked if America deserved Trump after the event’s host remarked “it’s commonly said that countries deserve the governments they get.”

“Well, I would have to say no, we did not deserve that,” Clinton replied.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=3&v=uNc6nKzo73E&ab_channel=MediaWatch

Washington Times has more:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=3&v=uNc6nKzo73E&ab_channel=MediaWatch
“His whole campaign: ‘Make America Great Again’ was looking backwards,” she told attendees at India Today: Conclave 2018. “You know, ‘You didn’t like black people getting rights? You don’t like women, you know, getting jobs? You don’t want to, you know, see that Indian American succeeding more than you are? Whatever your problem is — I’m going to solve it.”

The remarks were posted online by the GOP War Room YouTube channel and blasted as “dismissing America’s Heartland to a foreign audience.”

WOW!
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 53157
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: If Hillary Goes Down So Will Obama

Post  Admin on Sat 10 Mar 2018, 4:38 pm

Hillary Clinton to receive Radcliffe award medal at Harvard
https://www.conservativeinstitute.org/conservative-news/hillary-clinton-medal-harvard.htm?
March 8, 2018

Hillary Clinton to receive Radcliffe award medal at Harvard
JStone / Shutterstock.com
While most Americans have had their fill of liberal elitists praising other liberal elitists from the 90th annual Academy Awards this weekend, those who have a lingering appetite for such hubris should turn to Harvard University on May 25. On this day, former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton will receive the prestigious Radcliffe Medal from the ultra-liberal Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study, celebrating her lifetime of achievement as a “champion for human rights.”

Clinton will receive her award on Radcliffe Day, described by The Harvard Gazette as an “annual gathering to celebrate the institute’s commitment to excellence and inquiry.” The former Obama appointee is being honored for her “transformative impact” on society.

And the winner is …
Radcliffe Dean Lizabeth Cohen issued a stream of flattering adjectives towards Clinton in response to the Institute’s announcement. She called the twice-failed presidential nominee “champion for human rights,” a “skilled legislator,” and “an advocate of American leadership to create a world in which states live up to their responsibilities.”

Of course, America hardly lived up to its global responsibilities while Clinton served as secretary of State. Under her stewardship, Libya was bombed into submission and left in ruins, Iraq was abandoned at a crucial moment, and Syria was neglected enough to give rise to an Islamic terrorist empire.

Clinton’s record on protecting human rights certainly isn’t worth celebrating, either. During her first trip abroad as secretary of State, Clinton intentionally deemphasized China’s atrocious record of human rights abuses, prompting the Boston Globe to write:

[Clinton] gave the impression that the Obama administration is preparing to downgrade human rights and freedom of expression in American foreign policy.

Clinton made another kind of gaffe when she said pressing China on human rights ‘can’t interfere with the global economic crisis, the global climate change crisis, and the security crisis.’

Feminist U
However, Clinton satisfies requirements that are far more important to Harvard than the technical nuances of her actual human rights record. Most importantly, Clinton was born with twin copies of the influential “X” chromosome, making her a candidate for the Radcliffe Award from birth.

Being a woman is not sufficient to win, though. She would also have to stand out as a progressive icon if she wanted to take home the coveted Radcliffe.

Fortunately for Clinton, she passes the liberal smell test with flying colors. According to an analysis of roll call votes by Voteview, Clinton was more liberal than other senators 85 percent of the time — a record not even surpassed by the socialist-leaning Barack Obama’s during his time in the Senate.

Ontheissues.org, a not-for-profit organization whose bipartisan mission is to provide information to voters, concluded that “Hillary Clinton is a Hard-Core Liberal.”

The Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study was certainly impressed by Clinton’s record as a feminist. A legacy from the age of segregated classrooms, Radcliffe College was a means for women to attain a Harvard education until 1999 when it formally merged with the Ivy League school.

Liberals loving liberals
Much of Radcliffe’s feminist student body deplored this integration, even finding the radically leftist Harvard campus too moderately mainstream for their sensibilities. During the merger, Sophia Chang, co-chair of a student group devoted to lesbians, bisexuals, and “questioning women,” recalled:

I came to realize that Harvard was also a white, male institution like any other. In fact, this is the belly of the beast. If there’s any place to be this is it. If you’re fighting the beast, stay in the belly, find out where it goes.

Clinton will fit in well with these militantly vindictive Radcliffe alumni. After her latest disastrous presidential campaign, she insisted that “millions of white people” were to blame, and she called her opponent’s inauguration speech “a cry from the white nationalist gut.”

She fails to stand out in ideology or political persuasion from previous Radcliffe Award winners. This includes a cast of liberal policymakers, including U.S. Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellen, Supreme Court Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright.

Clinton’s nomination from an Ivy League institution where 90 percent of faculty donations went to the Obama campaign in 2012 is hardly surprising. When two-thirds of college professors identify themselves as liberal in comparison to just 10 percent as conservatives, is it any wonder that a remarkably inefficient civic leader like Clinton would be glorified by academics?
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 53157
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

If Hillary Goes Down So Will Obama

Post  Admin on Sat 17 Feb 2018, 12:14 am

If Hillary Goes Down So Will Obama
http://shoebat.com/2018/02/14/if-hillary-goes-down-so-will-obama
by KD on February 14, 2018 in Featured, General
Keith Davies political correspondent
As the truth continues to come out about all the scandals intertwining together, i.e Uranium One, Clinton email scandal, FISA Scandal with illegal spying, framing of Michael Flynn, the phony special counsel and the leaks of classified information in the first few months of the Trump administration; the key information which has not been revealed yet are the private communications between Clinton and Obama on their illegal private emails, while they were in office. The real reason why there was no prosecution of Hillary Clinton is because she and Barrack Obama were communicating both classified information and dastardly schemes to subvert our laws and play the dirty tricks that are now being exposed slowly from Congress and other sources. There is also the Benghazi scandal that involved both Obama and Clinton. The private email conversations/threads between Clinton and Obama will surely give us the true picture of the coverup and lying over the “Video” and what they were doing to coverup their negligent missteps and possibly the illegal arms to terrorists in Syria with Turkey as the conduit (unlikely to see these as they will probably be redacted). The emails will also show how these two so-called public servants plotted to deceive the American people on an ongoing basis.
It is apparent that the law breaking by Obama is just as big or possibly even bigger than Hillary Clinton. After the election both Clinton and Obama panicked and were attempting to cover up the law breaking and dirty tricks they had sown while in power because they knew they would be found out unless they could cover their tracks. It appears Susan Rice the faithful sycophant and former National Security Adviser was playing the loyal soldier in so far that she was playing coverup girl for Obama.

The FISA court applications are a prime example as the warrant was only required to legitimatize the spying on Trump even though the Steele Dossier was weak. The first FISA was turned down in June 2016. It is a good guess that the Obama administration along with a willing DOJ and FBI reintroduced the FISA application in October 2016 hoping to get a different judge who they knew would side with them, so they could legitimize the spying, however, the time line shows that spying was already going on without even the bogus FISA warrant. It looks like FISA Judge Rudolph Contreras was either their patsy or he himself was an eager participant in their scheme by his bias for Obama and against Trump. The FISA transcripts will expose whether this is true or not, or whether the judge was just a fool, as the Steele Dossier on its face was a ridiculous fraud just on its face value.
Federal Judge Rudolph Contreras
One of the issues that the left-wing media dismissed or ignored was a few months before the 2012 reelection bid of Obama on a hot mic (meant to be private conversation) message to the Russian prime minister Dimitri Medvedev saying ‘Give me space, let me win the election first – them I can do what Vladimir wants.’
Was this arms control, international affairs or was it something else? Uranium one was signed off in 2010 couple of years before this meeting but it begs the question was Obama involved also in the Uranium One scandal and was he also one of the financial beneficiaries of the bribes? I think the Feds need to check Obama’s finances and offshore trusts. With Clinton through her Crime Foundation receiving one hundred forty-five million from Vladimir Putin’s cronies, do we think Obama would not want in on the deal? It is hard to believe Clinton and the CFIUS (Investment Security in the Department of the Treasury) committee were not on board unless Obama was going to get some of this cash or a separate bribe. While this is speculation at this stage the current news and evidence suggests that the above is a strong probability and needs to be thoroughly investigated. If this scheme turns out to be true then both Clinton and Obama are guilty of High Treason along with the other members of the CFIUS committee for undermining the security of the United States in return for a bribe.

As the whole picture is revealed and the private emails between Obama and Clinton are exposed it will show both of them not only played dirty tricks with illegal spying and corruption, but also probably committed High Treason. It will be hard based on the facts that come out not to prosecute the two of them for the crimes they committed without subjecting the credibility of the country, do we as a country not believe that the Republic believes in equal justice under the law. If public opinion reaches over 65% that Obama and Clinton did in fact by virtue of information in the public domain committed acts of treason and then no legal action is taken against them with an appropriate punishment if convicted, then our country will be seriously compromised and our constitution will have been shown as a useless document undermined by people who have sworn to uphold it.

The information we have seen so far suggests that the worst of the behavior of the previous administration has not been revealed yet. While your expectations as readers of Shoebat.com will not show surprise of more major malfeasance, on the other hand it will be very shocking for the average American who does not tune into the politics of the country and gets most of their news from the MSM who will try their best to cover for the Democrats even though it will be very hard to do so based on the amount of arrests that will be made. Some of the media might even try to blame Trump for the arrests suggesting he is like the brown shirts rounding up his political opposition. The crimes are so bad and done by so many that it might certainly appear that way when dozens of people are arrested and the public are lied to, with phony reasons served up by the MSM. It will be up to as many of us who believe in the truth to explain to our neighbors and using social media to get the truth out on the scale of the crimes committed, which were not just against Donald Trump but were directed against WE THE PEOPLE.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 53157
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: If Hillary Goes Down So Will Obama

Post  Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 2 of 2 Previous  1, 2

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum