Who is online?
In total there are 11 users online :: 0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 11 Guests :: 1 Bot

None

[ View the whole list ]


Most users ever online was 111 on Thu 12 Dec 2013, 2:28 am
Latest topics
» PROPHESY NEWS WATCH
Today at 9:07 pm by Admin

» Mrs. P's Haven of Refuge Inspirational
Today at 8:51 pm by Admin

»  HONEST REPORTING Defending Israel from Media Bias plz read REGULAR UPDATES
Today at 8:48 pm by Admin

»  BRITAIN NEWS AND ALERT's
Today at 8:41 pm by Admin

» WORLD ISRAEL NEWS
Today at 8:23 pm by Admin

» ISRAEL VIDEO'S
Today at 2:31 pm by Admin

» Delrifkah: HEBREW SAGE MIGHT SAY.
Today at 12:36 pm by Admin

» WORTHY NEWS
Today at 12:13 pm by Admin

» Daily Disciples
Today at 12:10 pm by Admin

» HEAVEN LETTERS
Today at 12:08 pm by Admin

» ENDTIME HEADLINES
Today at 11:41 am by Admin

» WAR DRUMS
Yesterday at 10:39 pm by Admin

» HURRICANE STORMS FLOODING
Yesterday at 10:37 pm by Admin

» BIRTH PANGS – Series of Powerful Earthquakes Volcano's Strike Around the Globe
Yesterday at 10:36 pm by Admin

» JIHAD WATCH
Yesterday at 9:14 pm by Admin

» Saudi Arabia claims Khashoggi died in accidental ‘fistfight’ inside the consulate
Yesterday at 7:58 pm by Admin

» Bayo Afolaranmi (Pastor).
Yesterday at 6:19 pm by Admin

» R.D SOUZA Saved by faith
Yesterday at 6:18 pm by Admin

» NUGGET Today's Devotional
Yesterday at 6:12 pm by Admin

» Democrats' phony compassion.
Yesterday at 5:42 pm by Admin

Navigation
 Portal
 Index
 Memberlist
 Profile
 FAQ
 Search

EU declares intention to end “national sovereignty,” “kill off populist politics”

Go down

Re: EU declares intention to end “national sovereignty,” “kill off populist politics”

Post  Admin on Sun 07 Oct 2018, 3:19 pm

Hi Elaine:
We are moving in the direction of allowing the Antichrist take over whereby globalists ares making preparations for a one world government and one world religion spoken of in the bible about what is to come in the tribulation period.    Don't collaborate with this line of thinking!  Social Justice?  What is that?  Taking from one to give to another, a redistribution of wealth.  What one works for, governments wants to take it from you and give it forcibly to someone else.  Jesus Christ was NOT a socialist.  You cannot equalize society, but you can provide opportunities for those who want to work and provide for themselves and their families.  Open borders is causative to bringing about a world government. 
sparrow
Socialism is a stage on the path to communism. There is very little difference between the two.  Socialism is when a dictatorship government (Congress) takes from each according to their ability (taxes) and gives to each according to their needs. It is a redistribution of wealth. It is also a means to eliminate private ownership of property. Those enslaved in this system receive enough to sustain themselves, but they can never rise above that position in life.  Socialism is hostile to religion and believes it is an illusion.
Marxism is a branch of communism. Karl Marx was a non-believer and an enemy of religion. He basically believed that man creates God, rather than the reverse.  Marxism is in the minds of many people in our government today.  They are taught this in liberal colleges.  “It takes a village” is a term used by Marxists.  They organize the weak, but the weak can never become strong under this type of regime.
Communism is basically the same except the government disappears. Communism takes from each according to their ability and gives to each according to their need.  This is still a forced redistribution of wealth.  Communism rejects religion.
Communism is an economic and political system based on the principle "From each according to their ability, to each according to their need." It stresses that the control of the means of producing economic goods in a society should reside in the hands of those who invest their labor for production. In its ideal form, social classes cease to exist, there are no coercive governmental structures, and everyone lives in abundance without supervision from a ruling class. Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels popularized this theory in their 1848 Communist Manifesto.”
Capitalism is working for what you want.  When what you work for is taken away and forcefully distributed among others, then we have socialism/communism. “Capitalism is an economic theory which stresses that control of the means of producing economic goods in a society should reside in the hands of those who invest the capital for production. It is a system based on the production of goods and services for exchange rather than use. Private ownership and free enterprise supposedly leads to more efficiency, lower prices, and better products. Adam Smith popularized this theory in his 1776 book The Wealth of Nations.
Totalitarianism is going one step further, perhaps you will also recognize totalitarianism creeping into the picture.  This is a form of government in which the ruler is a dictator.  The government is in the hands of a minority who often rule through military might and extreme political repression.  (The health care bill provides for a private police force for the President.)
Fascism is a totalitarian philosophy of government that glorifies the state and nation and assigns to the state control over every aspect of national life with elements of Darwinism and elitism.  Characteristics: Controlled media, human rights are viewed as of little value, disinformation and propaganda, increased police power, fraudulent elections.  The power elite use political corruption to enrich themselves.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 54378
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: EU declares intention to end “national sovereignty,” “kill off populist politics”

Post  Admin on Sun 07 Oct 2018, 3:04 pm

How a secretive elite created the EU to build a world government
Voters in Britain's referendum need to understand that the European Union was about building a federal superstate from day one
Harold Macmillan waves to unseen observers as he stands before a jet airliner with future Prime Minister Edward Heath in 1963
Harold Macmillan, here with Edward Heath, couldn't get a free-trade deal Photo: PA
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/eureferendum/12018877/The-truth-how-a-secretive-elite-created-the-EU-to-build-a-world-government.html
By Prof Alan Sked8:30AM GMT 27 Nov 2015
As the debate over the forthcoming EU referendum gears up, it would be wise perhaps to remember how Britain was led into membership in the first place. It seems to me that most people have little idea why one of the victors of the Second World War should have become almost desperate to join this "club". That's a shame, because answering that question is key to understanding why the EU has gone so wrong.

Most students seem to think that Britain was in dire economic straits, and that the European Economic Community – as it was then called – provided an economic engine which could revitalise our economy. Others seem to believe that after the Second World War Britain needed to recast her geopolitical position away from empire, and towards a more realistic one at the heart of Europe. Neither of these arguments, however, makes any sense at all.

The EEC in the 1960s and 1970s was in no position to regenerate anyone’s economy. It spent most of its meagre resources on agriculture and fisheries and had no means or policies to generate economic growth.

"When we entered the EEC our annual growth rate was a record 7.4 per cent. The present Chancellor would die for such figures"
When growth did happen, it did not come from the EU. From Ludwig Erhard's supply-side reforms in West Germany in 1948 to Thatcher's privatisation of nationalised industry in the Eighties, European growth came from reforms introduced by individual countries which were were copied elsewhere. EU policy has always been either irrelevant or positively detrimental (as was the case with the euro).

Nor did British growth ever really lag behind Europe's. Sometimes it surged ahead. In the 1950s Western Europe had a growth rate of 3.5 per cent; in the 1960s, it was 4.5 per cent. But in 1959, when Harold Macmillan took office, the real annual growth rate of British GDP, according to the Office of National Statistics, was almost 6 per cent. It was again almost 6 per cent when de Gaulle vetoed our first application to join the EEC in 1963.

In 1973, when we entered the EEC, our annual national growth rate in real terms was a record 7.4 per cent. The present Chancellor would die for such figures. So the economic basket-case argument doesn’t work.

What about geopolitics? What argument in the cold light of hindsight could have been so compelling as to make us kick our Second-World-War Commonwealth allies in the teeth to join a combination of Belgium, the Netherlands, Luxembourg, France, Germany and Italy?

Four of these countries held no international weight whatsoever. Germany was occupied and divided. France, meanwhile, had lost one colonial war in Vietnam and another in Algeria. De Gaulle had come to power to save the country from civil war. Most realists must surely have regarded these states as a bunch of losers. De Gaulle, himself a supreme realist, pointed out that Britain had democratic political institutions, world trade links, cheap food from the Commonwealth, and was a global power. Why would it want to enter the EEC?

"Harold Macmillan and his closest advisers were part of an intellectual tradition that saw the salvation of the world in some form of world government"
The answer is that Harold Macmillan and his closest advisers were part of an intellectual tradition that saw the salvation of the world in some form of world government based on regional federations. He was also a close acquaintance of Jean Monnet, who believed the same. It was therefore Macmillan who became the representative of the European federalist movement in the British cabinet.

In a speech in the House of Commons he even advocated a European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC) before the real thing had been announced. He later arranged for a Treaty of Association to be signed between the UK and the ECSC, and it was he who ensured that a British representative was sent to the Brussels negotiations following the Messina Conference, which gave birth to the EEC.

In the late 1950s he pushed negotiations concerning a European Free Trade Association towards membership of the EEC. Then, when General de Gaulle began to turn the EEC into a less federalist body, he took the risk of submitting a full British membership application in the hope of frustrating Gaullist ambitions.

His aim, in alliance with US and European proponents of a federalist world order, was to frustrate the emerging Franco-German alliance which was seen as one of French and German nationalism.

.The French statesman Jean Monnet, (1888 - 1979), who in 1956 was appointed president of the Action Committee for the United States of Europe

Monnet met secretly with Heath and Macmillan on innumerable occasions to facilitate British entry. Indeed, he was informed before the British Parliament of the terms in which the British approach to Europe would be framed.

Despite advice from the Lord Chancellor, Lord Kilmuir, that membership would mean the end of British parliamentary sovereignty, Macmillan deliberately misled the House of Commons — and practically everyone else, from Commonwealth statesmen to cabinet colleagues and the public — that merely minor commercial negotiations were involved. He even tried to deceive de Gaulle that he was an anti-federalist and a close friend who would arrange for France, like Britain, to receive Polaris missiles from the Americans. De Gaulle saw completely through him and vetoed the British bid to enter.

Macmillan left Edward Heath to take matters forward, and Heath, along with Douglas Hurd, arranged — according to the Monnet papers — for the Tory Party to become a (secret) corporate member of Monnet’s Action Committee for a United States of Europe.

According to Monnet’s chief aide and biographer, Francois Duchene, both the Labour and Liberal Parties later did the same. Meanwhile the Earl of Gosford, one of Macmillan’s foreign policy ministers in the House of Lords, actually informed the House that the aim of the government’s foreign policy was world government.

"The Anglo-American establishment was now committed to the creation of a federal United States of Europe"
Monnet’s Action Committee was also given financial backing by the CIA and the US State Department. The Anglo-American establishment was now committed to the creation of a federal United States of Europe.

Today, this is still the case. Powerful international lobbies are already at work attempting to prove that any return to democratic self-government on the part of Britain will spell doom. American officials have already been primed to state that such a Britain would be excluded from any free trade deal with the USA and that the world needs the TTIP trade treaty which is predicated on the survival of the EU.

Fortunately, Republican candidates in the USA are becoming Eurosceptics and magazines there like The National Interest are publishing the case for Brexit. The international coalition behind Macmillan and Heath will find things a lot more difficult this time round — especially given the obvious difficulties of the Eurozone, the failure of EU migration policy and the lack of any coherent EU security policy.

Most importantly, having been fooled once, the British public will be much more difficult to fool again.

Alan Sked is the original founder of Ukip and professor of International History at the London School of Economics. He is presently collecting material for a book he hopes to publish on Britain's experience of the EU
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 54378
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

EU declares intention to end “national sovereignty,” “kill off populist politics”

Post  Admin on Sat 06 Oct 2018, 8:36 pm

   


EU declares intention to end “national sovereignty,” “kill off populist politics”
OCT 4, 2018 9:54 AM BY CHRISTINE DOUGLASS-WILLIAMS 41 COMMENTS
The European Union (EU) must bring an end to national sovereignty over finance with the creation of a “eurozone budget” in order to kill off populist politics within the euro region, according to the Commission.
 https://www.jihadwatch.org/2018/10/eu-declares-intention-to-end-national-sovereignty-kill-off-populist-politics
The European Union is becoming more brazenly Marxist in its advocacy for open borders (enabling the hijrah), which is the biggest threat to democracy today. The EU has already been attempting to bully sovereign states such as Poland and Hungary with threats of sanctions for not accepting its imposed quotas of migrants. Now it’s becoming even more aggressive, accusing so-called “populist” states that seek to keep their countries safe and societies free of being anti-democratic….

Economic affairs chief of the EU’s unelected executive arm, Pierre Moscovici, said that “more progress in European integration” is required to head off populism, which he described as “a major threat for our democracies, for liberal democracies, for the rule of law and for European values”.

Europe has seen the worst breaches of the rule of law since flinging its doors open to indiscriminate immigration. No-go zones (some war-like) have proliferated, as well as jihad attacks, random stabbings, anti-Semitism, and sex assaults.

“Populism” is actually the rise of reason among the people, seeking safety and protection in the face of corrupted politicians who have opted to reshape Europe via the hijrah, as jihadists have also infiltrated the refugee stream. Mosques preaching jihad have proliferated everywhere; many are foreign-funded. Still, the EU openly spreads its propaganda in the hope of keeping its citizens blind. The audacious extent of its falsehoods is well encapsulated by George Soros’ Open Society Foundations website, which declares that “the threat to Liberal Democracy” is “from the backlash against immigration and refugees.”

“Commission: EU Must Curb National Sovereignty to Kill Populism,” by Virginia Hale, Breitbart, September 27, 2018:

The European Union (EU) must bring an end to national sovereignty over finance with the creation of a “eurozone budget” in order to kill off populist politics within the euro region, according to the Commission.

Economic affairs chief of the EU’s unelected executive arm, Pierre Moscovici, said that “more progress in European integration” is required to head off populism, which he described as “a major threat for our democracies, for liberal democracies, for the rule of law and for European values”.

“Having a eurozone budget is absolutely decisive if we want to address the populist challenge, the burning question of inequalities,” he told an interview with Euractiv.

Speaking after a talk at New York’s European American Chamber of Commerce, Moscovici said: “The European crisis is no more an economic crisis. It is an inequality crisis. It is a political crisis. It is a crisis of delivery. We need to deliver more. That is what eurozone reform is about. It is not technical. It is highly political.”

Turning to talk of Italy, where citizens elected a coalition between the Eurosceptic, anti-establishment Five Star Movement and the anti-mass migration League earlier this year, Moscovici warned against the government’s defiance of EU diktats demanding a steep curb to public spending.

The Paris-born Commissioner, who began his political career in France’s Revolutionary Communist League, stated: “My message is that their interest, not only their duty but their interest, is to reduce the structural deficit” and in turn their public debt so they can develop investment in the economy.”….
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 54378
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 73
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: EU declares intention to end “national sovereignty,” “kill off populist politics”

Post  Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum