World Wide Christians Partner with Jesus' Place/
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Who is online?
In total there are 14 users online :: 0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 14 Guests :: 1 Bot

None

[ View the whole list ]


Most users ever online was 115 on Wed 03 Jul 2019, 3:20 pm
Latest topics
» ENDTIME HEADLINES
OBAMA AGAIN  EmptyYesterday at 10:57 pm by Admin

» Donald Trump former POTUS
OBAMA AGAIN  EmptyYesterday at 10:31 pm by Admin

» CHRISTIAN NEWS NETWORK
OBAMA AGAIN  EmptyYesterday at 10:23 pm by Admin

» THE BLAZE
OBAMA AGAIN  EmptyYesterday at 10:05 pm by Admin

» ATLAS SHRUGS - PAMELA GELLER
OBAMA AGAIN  EmptyYesterday at 9:42 pm by Admin

» ISRAEL BREAKING NEWS
OBAMA AGAIN  EmptyYesterday at 9:41 pm by Admin

» ISRAEL VIDEO'S VARIOUS COVERAGES
OBAMA AGAIN  EmptyYesterday at 8:16 pm by Admin

» BIBLE STUDY on VERSE
OBAMA AGAIN  EmptyYesterday at 8:13 pm by Admin

» WORTHY NEWS
OBAMA AGAIN  EmptyYesterday at 8:11 pm by Admin

» Daily Disciples
OBAMA AGAIN  EmptyYesterday at 8:10 pm by Admin

» servant @ TWO LISTENERS
OBAMA AGAIN  EmptyYesterday at 8:08 pm by Admin

»  Chip Brogden CHURCH WITHOUT WALLS
OBAMA AGAIN  EmptyTue 19 Jan 2021, 11:56 pm by Admin

» +Dev+ Michael D. Inman Pastor
OBAMA AGAIN  EmptyTue 19 Jan 2021, 11:55 pm by Admin

» NUGGET Today's Devotional
OBAMA AGAIN  EmptyTue 19 Jan 2021, 11:54 pm by Admin

» Please pray for Molly
OBAMA AGAIN  EmptyTue 19 Jan 2021, 11:49 pm by Admin

» AISH
OBAMA AGAIN  EmptyTue 19 Jan 2021, 9:41 pm by Admin

»  HONEST REPORTING Defending Israel from Media Bias plz read REGULAR UPDATES
OBAMA AGAIN  EmptyTue 19 Jan 2021, 8:48 pm by Admin

» Mitch McConnell, Wife Elaine Chao Financially Tied to the Chinese Government
OBAMA AGAIN  EmptyTue 19 Jan 2021, 8:45 pm by Admin

» Joe Biden Democrats Kamala Harris -Election Fraud
OBAMA AGAIN  EmptyTue 19 Jan 2021, 8:40 pm by Admin

» REVELATION TV Don't miss VIDEO's, Reminders INFO of LIVE programs .
OBAMA AGAIN  EmptyTue 19 Jan 2021, 7:55 pm by Admin

Navigation
 Portal
 Index
 Memberlist
 Profile
 FAQ
 Search

OBAMA AGAIN

Page 1 of 3 1, 2, 3  Next

Go down

OBAMA AGAIN  Empty Re: OBAMA AGAIN

Post  Admin on Wed 06 Jan 2021, 7:26 pm

https://www.israelunwired.com/obama-admin-knowingly-funded-terror-linked-group-heres-the-proof/

OBAMA ADMIN KNOWINGLY FUNDED TERROR-LINKED GROUP – HERE’S THE PROOF
written by Phil Schneider January 6, 2021 2823 views
During the first year or two of the Obama administration, many were trying to figure out if Barack Obama was indeed hostile to the State of Israel or if he simply was not pro-Israel. He barely had any political experience to extrapolate his future policies from. But, very quickly, he made good on his pledge to be a transformative president. He did not want to leave the world as it was by the end of his administration. That is indeed what he did. What he did locally with healthcare, his signature policy within the confines of the United States, he did with the Iran agreement, his most controversial policy outside the borders of the United States.

https://rumble.com/vcbaah-obama-admin.-knowingly-funded-terror-linked-organization.html

When Barack Obama realized that he had much more room to maneuver on foreign policy issues than on domestic issues, Obama unleashed his controversial pro-Muslim ideologies on the Middle East. His speech in Cairo made major waves in the entire Middle East. Egypt’s stable non-radical leadership found themselves suddenly under siege by anti-Government protesters – many of whom were radical Muslim brotherhood members. Ultimately, Egypt was led temporarily by a radical Muslim group. Fortunately, that did not last long and Egypt returned to a more moderate mindset. However, in other countries, especially Syria and Iraq became countries filled with radical Islamic militants fighting incessantly against each other. ISIS became the #1 concern of the entire Middle East. The scary part of this video is that it displays the troubling fact that the Obama administration became the leading funder of terror in the Middle East via the Iran agreement.
Of course, Obama explained this away with language filled with appeasement. But, if anyone needs clarification on this issue, let them just listen to the same refrain that Iranian leaders have been saying for years since Donald Trump’s elections – “Get rid of the sanctions.” The Iranian leadership enjoyed the Obama siesta when they were able to get away with more and more of their nuclear plans. If the Trump administration policies are followed up with further appeasement from the Biden administration, then Israel will have to take matters into their own hands once again. Israel will not sit and allow an existential threat to grow and grow without doing anything about it.
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 67868
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 75
Location : Wales UK

https://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

OBAMA AGAIN  Empty Re: OBAMA AGAIN

Post  Admin on Tue 22 Dec 2020, 9:41 pm

https://www.wnd.com/2020/12/leader-5-year-coup-attempt-puppeteer-barack-obama/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=wnd&utm_campaign=dlvrit&utm_content=2020-12-21&fbclid=IwAR2wYOiAXimNCPR-gfm-xftvg4pdRz72RTyPUqeVEb40TYJmsY43YsJ_vV0
COMMENTARY WND NEWS CENTER
OPERATION SNOW GLOBE
The leader of the 5-year coup attempt: Puppeteer Barack Obama
Exclusive: Lt. Col. James Zumwalt connects the dots in wake of businessman's claim of bribing Hillary
Lt. Col. James Zumwalt By Lt. Col. James Zumwalt
Published December 21, 2020 at 7:45pm
During a 2003 panel discussion on terrorism, the observation was made that, prior to 9/11, America failed to connect the dots leading up to that fateful day. In today's chaotic world, it is easy to miss isolated dots concerning issues we should be connecting. A story revealed just last week – a firsthand account by a most reliable source, Patrick Byrne, billionaire founder of the Internet furniture retailer Overstock.com – suggests we again have failed to do so.

Byrne's story is most disturbing. It details how Hillary Clinton received yet another "get out of jail card" for previously unknown criminal conduct swept under the rug – and the ominous reason why. His claim, when connected to other dots, lends credibility to his story.

Among the dots are the following:
In modern times, U.S. presidents traditionally retire to their home states, having little desire to remain in Washington, D.C. They recognize their time is up and the present president should not feel uncomfortable by a past president's presence in his backyard. It is kind of an unspoken courtesy observed since Woodrow Wilson left the White House in 1921, although a few departing presidents have lived temporarily in Washington, D.C. Two presidents leaving office who subsequently chose to remain permanently were Bill Clinton and Barack Obama. Understandably, the Clintons bought a Washington, D.C. home in 2000 as Hillary had been elected to the Senate. However, Obama's decision to rent, and later buy, a home in Washington, D.C., may, if Byrne's story is true, have been driven by a more sinister motive.
In a recent video interview, Obama made a strange revelation. He said he would be fine running a presidency from the basement of his home, with a way to communicate with a "front" person. He shared, "I used to say, if, if, I could make an arrangement where I had a stand-in, a front man, a front woman and they had an earpiece in and I was in the basement in my sweats … I'd be fine with that." But did he mean during his presidency or after?
Incoming 'Squad' member says 'our current system of capitalism is slavery by another name'
TRENDING: Why so many RINOs have turned on Trump

Earlier this year, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi established a commission to explore the need for Congress to remove a mentally unfit president from office. She said at the time, "This is not about President Trump. … But he shows the need for us to create a process for future presidents." With the numerous gaffes, lapses in thought, etc., presidential candidate Joe Biden displayed, suggesting mental deterioration, could it be Pelosi knew Biden would win the election but then be hard-pressed to lead the country?
There were two individuals with enormous impact on the Biden campaign – Obama and Hungarian-born American multi-billionaire investor and philanthropist George Soros. According to research reports by the Sturgis-Fellowes Institute, both sought to maneuver Sen. Kamala Harris into the White House in 2020. This was why Obama was hesitant, before Biden emerged as the Democratic Party's winner, to endorse him. Soros especially sought a candidate who, like Obama, had broad appeal. He, in fact, enlisted Obama in the effort "to teach Senator Harris how to be silky smooth in her rhetoric and delivery." Primary voters obviously did not agree with Soros as Harris had to drop out of the presidential race. However, clearly these two men influenced Biden to select her as his running mate. Unsurprisingly, among the first to congratulate her after Biden's selection was Soros' son, Alexander.

When Obama initially chose to rent a Washington, D.C., home, it was with the total expectation he would be followed into the Oval Office by Hillary. (More on this is shared by Byrne below.) However, her surprising loss still left Obama well positioned geographically to establish a shadow government. When Rep. John Lewis made it clear Democrats did not view Trump as a legitimate president because of false allegations of Russian collusion, Michele Obama – in a stealthy but subversive tweet – praised Lewis as a civil rights hero in an effort to embrace the speaker of those words without directly embracing the words themselves. She added that "great leaders" like Lewis should be "our call to action." Meanwhile, Barack Obama, in his own subversive tweet, expressed support for the anti-Trump protesters, saying he was "heartened" by them. Left unmentioned was the fact his political network, Organizing for Action, had played a role in promoting the protests. Situated just 2 miles from the White House, the Obamas worked with other Democrats to destroy Trump's presidency to preserve Obama's legacy.
With this year's presidential election over and Biden supporters confident their man will be sworn in on Jan. 20, a noticeable development has occurred among mainstream media (MSM). Before the election, they would not touch the Bidens' questionable dealings with China; but MSM now seems to focus on covering them. Meanwhile, the only person defending the Bidens at this point is Joe. A national defense analyst suggests this sudden media interest may be foreboding – a sign Democrats are setting Joe up for a fall. If so, it obviously would fulfill the goal set by Obama and Soros to seat their "Wonder Woman" – Kamala Harris – in the Oval Office.
With these dots in mind, the following post-election revelation shared by Byrne about Hillary and Barack connects them.

Not only does Byrne's reputation as a successful businessman give credibility to what he says, but so too does the fact he is by no means a Trump supporter – having voted for him neither in 2016 nor 2020. His story will be detailed in more detail in the long-awaited John Durham investigative report. Durham is the Department of Justice attorney assigned by Attorney General William Barr to investigate the origins of the FBI's investigation of contacts between the Trump campaign and Russian state agents.

In a recent bombshell interview, Byrne discusses "Operation Snow Globe." He says, "I facilitated a bribe for Hillary Clinton on January 14, 2016 … on behalf of the FBI." He claims the FBI came to him on Dec. 1, 2015, to disclose that Hillary had previously accepted a $20 million bribe from the Turkish government. They told Byrne they had authorization to set Hillary up in a sting and his services were needed to facilitate it. The sting involved an $18 million bribe from another government (ironically believed to be Russia). Byrne's mission was to get Hillary alone for 10 minutes in a room where that government's representative would meet with her. Hillary discreetly did so, making sure she kept the meeting off her official calendar, and accepted the bribe. Byrne says Attorney General William Barr knows about the sting operation as well as Durham.

What Byrne shared next was what made him go public with what he knows and how, after doing so, people will understand what has been going on in America.

Byrne says three days after the sting, the FBI came back and informed him he would have to forget about what happened. Inquiring why, he was told Hillary was clearly going to win the 2016 presidential election and when she did, she would send her own people over to the FBI to bury the evidence of her bribery. Anyone involved in the investigation would be destroyed, including Byrne. He was told the operation had been scrubbed at the highest level.

While Byrne initially accepted this decision, it did not sit well with him. Three weeks later, he made his frustrations known to the FBI. He said there was ample time before the election for him to appear before a grand jury to testify and for Hillary to be indicted. Again the FBI declined. But what they told him next, Byrne explains, is key to understanding what has been happening in America the past five years. He recounts being told the following:

"President Obama has his people across this federal bureaucracy at this point but especially the Department of Justice. Hillary is going to be president for eight years, and nothing is going to change that."

Advertisement - story continues below

Ads by Revcontent
Last Nights Episode Left Viewers Speechless!
Amz
Shockingly, FBI agents then shared Obama's plan to manipulate Hillary:

"… think of her (Hillary) being a Bunsen burner within the Department of Justice. That evidence about the two bribes … is going to be sitting on the Bunsen burner, and the hand on the Bunsen burner is going to be one of Barack Obama's people. If Hillary is a good girl and defends Obamacare, that flame stays low. If she's a bad girl and thinks for herself, it's going to get turned up high. That way Barack Obama is going to manage Hillary for the eight years she is president, and then she's going to step down and Michelle is going to run. … That's the plan. That came out of the lips of a federal agent. It was confirmed to me this spring that … plan was called Operation Snow Globe. That was Brennan and Obama's name for it. They were trying to get Hillary to step into a snow globe … that any time they wanted they could then pick it up and shake for eight years. My bribe was the bait to get her to step into the snow globe. …

"This isn't a theory. … I'm acknowledging I took part in all this. I thought I was helping them conduct federal law enforcement. It turned out that I was helping them set up Hillary Clinton for the Deep State to control her. … And so I'm saying, this entire thing, this last five years has been a coup from Obama against Hillary that when Trump won in a fluke, it got warped into the Russian collusion delusion. … I'm about as involved in this as you can get, and I promise you this is exactly what happened. And what we are seeing here is the last act to play out. …

"I knew in October 2018 that this was going to happen because in 2018 … a federal agent came to tell me, 'Patrick, you need to understand there are billionaires walking around this world that we made and we're prepared to do the same for you. You just have to stay calm. You have to stay quiet through the election.' And, by that election, I knew they meant the 2020 election. So I've known they were going to hijack this election since October of 2018."

Advertisement - story continues below


Connecting the dots tells us Obama remained in Washington's "swamp" to play the role of a puppeteer. He counted on holding the strings of power for what he believed would be an additional 16-year run, courtesy of Hillary and Michelle – with Hillary a willing puppet due to the bribery charges hanging over her head. In view of Trump's election spoiling Obama's Plan A, does Obama's Plan B now involve using the 25th Amendment to remove Biden from office to get his preferred candidate, Kamala Harris, in? And, as far as Hillary's bribery not coming to light before Byrne's tell-all interview, one assumes a Deep State still influenced by Obama kept it buried. Meanwhile, Biden may unknowingly be serving as a puppet in all this – one controlled by master puppeteer Barack Obama. Others may recognize this as recently suggested by CNN reporter Jeff Zeleny's slip of the tongue comment during an interview with Wolf Blitzer, referring to Biden as "President-elect Joebama," before correcting himself.

Obama's comment suggesting he would "be fine" running the White House from his basement with an earpiece enabling him to communicate with "a front woman" takes on special meaning within the context Byrne has provided. If Byrne's allegations are truthful and/or if massive fraud was involved in the 2020 presidential election, sinister forces have been at work in the shadows to destroy our Republic!

No wonder Obama recently and brazenly declared Republicans to be a "minority party." After all, his actions have sought to make America a one-party system.

Content created by the WND News Center is available for re-publication without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact licensing@wndnewscenter.org.
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 67868
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 75
Location : Wales UK

https://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

OBAMA AGAIN  Empty Re: OBAMA AGAIN

Post  Admin on Mon 21 Dec 2020, 9:02 pm

https://www.jihadwatch.org/2020/12/barack-obamas-revisionist-history-of-israel?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=the_2020_12_21_jihad_watch_daily_digest&utm_term=2020-12-21
Barack Obama’s Revisionist History of Israel
DEC 20, 2020 10:00 AM BY HUGH FITZGERALD10 COMMENTS
In his just-released A Promised Land, Barack Obama describes the Jewish immigrants to  Mandatory Palestine as ready to fight and defeat the Arabs. It’s a fanciful notion. Dov Lipman states:

His [Obama’s] claim that the new immigrants “organized highly trained armed forces to defend their settlements” is also misleading. A more accurate way to describe it would have been: “Because the Arabs in the region mercilessly attacked the Jewish areas, the Jewish refugees had no choice but to take up arms to defend themselves.”

The Jewish immigrants in fact only with great difficulty managed to defend their settlements; the marauding Arabs met little resistance; they attacked Jews before, during, and after World War I. The Jewish Legion – founded by Zev Jabotinsky – which had helped defend Jews from Arab attack during the Palestine Riots of 1920, was disbanded by the British in 1921. It was not until 1938 that the Jews of Palestine could mount an effective defense against the Arabs; this was due to a British officer, Capt. Orde Wingate, who gave Jews military training so that they could join the “Special Night Squads” that did not wait to be attacked by Arab marauders, but went out, at night, to confront them first.

Acknowledging that the Arabs were attacking Jews before there was even a state of Israel is important historical context for understanding the Israeli-Arab conflict….

The Jewish pioneers in Palestine were set upon from their earliest days by violent Arabs intent on driving them from the land. These Arab attacks are scarcely mentioned in Obama’s book; he depicts the Jewish pioneers — who were in fact untrained in war and largely helpless before Arab onslaughts — as powerful, well-organized, and able to prevail against the Arabs; this is the very opposite of the truth.

The description of “Arab nations that were just emerging from colonial rule” is a clear attempt to justify the Arab refusal of the U.N. Partition Plan. Those poor “Arab nations” that have been suffering due to outsiders colonizing their “nations” simply could not accept another “colonial” entity, the Jews, entering the region.

The Arabs in the Middle East turned down the Partition Plan for one reason: they were not prepared to accept a Jewish state, no matter how pitifully small it might be, on land that had once been, and therefore must always be, part of the Dar al-Islam. As for their supposed memory of colonialism, the Middle Eastern Arabs — unlike those in the Maghreb — had never suffered from European colonialists. Their masters were fellow Muslims – the Ottoman Turks. The British were in Iraq and the Emirate of Transjordan not to colonize these places, but to help the indigenous Arabs prepare for statehood; the French were doing the same for the Arabs in Lebanon and Syria. When Obama writes about “Arab nations that were just emerging from colonial rule” he apparently is confusing the Mandates system with colonialism; they are different things. The Mandates represented the very opposite of colonialism: they were meant not to subjugate people, as colonialism does, but to help them to create their own independent states.

But the truth is that with the exception of Egypt, which was not colonized, none of the neighboring countries that rejected the partition plan had been established states before World War I. Yes, the post-war mandates of the League of Nations gave control in the region to the British and the French for a few decades, but this was in place of the Ottoman Empire that had controlled the region for centuries. Thus, the image of countries emerging from long-standing colonial rule as a subtle attempt to justify their objection to the Partition Plan is simply false.

The U.N. partition plan was grossly unfair to the Jews, reducing their promised territory further still from what the Mandate for Palestine became, after 78% of its original area – all of Eastern Palestine — was ripped from it by the Mandatory, Great Britain, to become the Emirate of Transjordan. But the Jews in late 1947 were desperate for a state, no matter how small, in order to provide immediate refuge for the many Jews who were still languishing in DP camps in Europe, or who had tried to reach Palestine by ship and been turned back by the British.

Obama tells the story of the establishment of the State of Israel in two sentences, which are nothing short of outright revisionist history: “As Britain withdrew, the two sides quickly fell into war. And with Jewish militias claiming victory in 1948, the state of Israel was officially born.”

Wow. I don’t even know where to begin. The two sides didn’t “fall into war” when Britain withdrew; the two sides had been fighting for decades, with the Arabs—who rejected more than half-a-century of efforts to establish a Jewish state in the region—attacking the Jews, and the Jews defending themselves. When the British then left the area in May 1948, the Jews made a very difficult decision to declare their independence based on the U.N. Partition Plan, which gave the right for a Jewish state alongside an Arab state.

There were no “Jewish militias claiming victory.” There was a unified Jewish army that formed the Israel Defense Forces, which knew that the surrounding Arab countries would begin an all-out assault to destroy Israel the moment its Jewish leadership declared an independent fledgling Jewish state. And that is exactly what the Arab armies did. The new State of Israel fought off that assault for months, emerging in 1949 both weakened and fragile….

Obama never mentions that the Arab-Israeli war was not a case of Jews and Arabs who somehow, almost inexplicably and passively, “fell into war.”Arabs had been attacking Jewish pioneers nonstop since World War I. The 1948 war began when the armies of seven Arab states simultaneously attacked the nascent state of Israel, the day after the state of Israel had been declared, attempting to snuff out its young life. The Jewish army, not various“militias,” as Obama mistakenly maintains, managed to defeat and push back all of the attackers save for Jordan’s Arab Legion, which seized, and held onto, those parts of Judea and Samaria that in 1950 the Jordanians renamed “the West Bank” – a renaming intended to efface the Jewish connection to that land.

Obama seems to think that Israel and the Arab states that repeatedly attacked it are somehow equally responsible for the conflict. This defies belief. Three times – in 1948, 1967, and 1973 – Israel had to fight wars for its very survival, as Arab states attacked or were on the verge of attacking Israel; three times Israel won those wars. In 1956, after thousands of Israeli civilians in the Negev had been killed in separate attacks by Egyptian fedayeen from the Sinai, Israel finally seized the Sinai in self-defense. It returned that territory to Egypt in 1957, the fedayeen attacks, although they did not end entirely, went way down.

There were two mini-campaigns that Israel fought in Lebanon, first against the PLO terrorists in 1982, driving them out of the country, and then in 2006, against the terror group Hezbollah. Both mini-wars were begun by the Arab side, with repeated terror attacks by both the PLO and Hezbollah, that finally lead to an Israeli response. There were three campaigns against the terror group Hamas in Gaza: Operation Cast Lead (December 2008-January 2009), which began with ongoing rocket fire by Hamas; Operation Pillar of Defense (Nov. 2012), which was again prompted by Hamas’ rocket fire on southern Israel; Operation Protective Edge (July-August 2014), which was started by Hamas after the collapse of American-sponsored peace talks. None of these wars and campaigns are correctly described by Obama who blandly insists that Israel “engaged in a succession of conflicts with its Arab neighbors,” which clearly suggests that all these conflicts were started by the Jewish state.

Obama’s description of the 1967 Six-Day War continues this revisionism: “A greatly outnumbered Israeli military routed the combined armies of Egypt, Jordan and Syria. In the process, Israel seized control of the West Bank and East Jerusalem from Jordan, the Gaza Strip and the Sinai Peninsula from Egypt, and the Golan Heights from Syria.”

Here he fails to address what led up to the war, when all those Arab armies gathered along Israel’s borders and declared their intention to wipe it off the map. He doesn’t describe Israel’s pleading with Jordan not to enter the war, nor that Jordan altogether had no legal rights to the West Bank, which it occupied in 1948 and annexed against international law in 1950.

Obama fails to convey the atmosphere of alarm in Israel in the weeks before the Six-Day War broke out. There was anxiety in Israel as Nasser demanded that U Thant remove the U.N. peacekeeping troops from the Sinai, and then moved 100,000 Egyptian troops and 950 tanks northward in the Sinai toward the border with Israel. Meanwhile, from mid-May on, Nasser addressed cheering crowds in Cairo, telling them of the impending inevitable defeat of the Zionist state. Nasser also declared a blockade the Straits of Tiran, Israel’s maritime lifeline to Asia. He doesn’t mention, either, that the Syrian army mobilized on the Golan Heights, ready to stream into the Galilee when the Egyptians gave the word. Meanwhile France, Great Britain, and the U.S. did nothing to help Israel: no weapons, no diplomatic demarches, and no attempt to enforce the freedom of the seas against Egypt’s claim to blockade the Red Sea. Israel was, in its moment of maximum peril, completely alone. Jordan hesitated to join the Arab coalition, but once the war began, and despite the Israelis pleading with King Hussein not to enter the war, the King was assured by Nasser that the Egyptians were winning and he should join in to share in the victory and the spoils of war. To his great sorrow, the King believed Nasser and sent his troops into battle, where they were trounced by the Israelis, and Jordan lost all of the territory west of the Jordan River that it had occupied since 1948, the so-called “West Bank.” Egypt, Syria, and Jordan were the three aggressors; Israel was only defending its very survival. Obama conveys none of that.
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 67868
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 75
Location : Wales UK

https://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

OBAMA AGAIN  Empty Re: OBAMA AGAIN

Post  Admin on Thu 03 Dec 2020, 8:00 pm

Obama’s Revisionist ‘Promised Land’
Dec 2, 2020
by Dov Moshe Lipman, JNS.orgprint article
Obama’s Revisionist ‘Promised Land’
In his new memoir, the former U.S. president misleads readers in a way that will forever shape their negative perspective of the Jewish state.

I have never criticized former U.S. President Barack Obama publicly – neither during my time in the Knesset nor anywhere else – despite my having disagreed with many of his policies. I am of the strong opinion that Israelis should not engage in or interfere with American politics, and I regularly offer a blanket thank you to all American presidents, including Obama, for their economic and military support for Israel.

However, his memoir, A Promised Land, is filled with historical inaccuracies that I feel the need to address. His telling of Israel’s story (at the beginning of Chapter 25) not only exhibits a flawed understanding of the region – which clearly impacted his policies as president – but misleads readers in a way that will forever shape their negative perspective of the Jewish state.
Obama relates, for example, how the British were “occupying Palestine” when they issued the Balfour Declaration calling for a Jewish state. But labeling Great Britain as an “occupier” clearly casts doubt on its legitimacy to determine anything about the future of the Holy Land, and that wasn’t the situation.

While it is true that England had no legal rights in Palestine when the Balfour Declaration was issued in 1917, that changed just five years later. The League of Nations, the precursor to the United Nations, gave the British legal rights over Palestine in its 1922 “Mandate for Palestine,” which specifically mentions “the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people.”

The League also said that “recognition has thereby been given to the historical connection of the Jewish people with Palestine and to the grounds for reconstituting their national home in that country.”
 
The former president’s noted omission of the internationally agreed-upon mandate for the British to establish a home for the Jews in Palestine misinforms the reader, who will conclude that the movement for a Jewish state in Palestine had no legitimacy or international consent.

“Over the next 20 years, Zionist leaders mobilized a surge of Jewish migration to Palestine,” Obama writes, creating the image that once the British illegally began the process of forming a Jewish state in Palestine, Jews suddenly started flocking there.

Obama should have portrayed the Jews as they were: a persecuted and desperate people searching for safety; not, as he implies, strong conquerors flooding into Palestine.
The truth is that Jews, who maintained a continual presence throughout the 2,000 years that most were exiled from the land, had already been moving to Palestine in large numbers way before then; considerably more than 100,000 immigrants arrived in the late 19th century and beginning of the 20th century. Then, in the 1920s, high numbers fleeing anti-Semitism in Europe could only find safe haven in Palestine due to the United States having instituted quotas in 1924 on the number of Jews who could enter America.

The number of immigrants rose even more in the 1930s when Adolf Hitler rose to power and began his conquest of Europe while the world remained silent.

Historical context is important, and once Obama chose to write about the history, he should have provided the full context and portrayed the Jews as they were: a persecuted and desperate people searching for safety, and not, as he implies, strong conquerors flooding into Palestine.

His claim that the new immigrants “organized highly trained armed forces to defend their settlements” is also misleading. A more accurate way to describe it would have been: “Because the Arabs in the region mercilessly attacked the Jewish areas, the Jewish refugees had no choice but to take up arms to defend themselves.”

Acknowledging that the Arabs were attacking Jews before there was even a State of Israel is important historical context for understanding the Israeli-Arab conflict.

A Promised Land recounts, as well, how the United Nations passed a partition plan for Palestine in November 1947, by dividing the country into a Jewish and Arab state, which the “Zionist leaders,” as he calls them, accepted, but to which the “Arab Palestinians, as well as surrounding Arab nations that were just emerging from colonial rule, strenuously objected.”

Obama’s use of “Zionist leaders” instead of “Jewish leaders” plays right into the current international climate, in which it is politically correct to be “anti-Zionist,” while unacceptable to be anti-Jewish. (In reality, Zionism is the movement for Jews to live in their biblical and historic homeland, so being against that actually is anti-Semitism, but that’s for another discussion.)

The description of “Arab nations that were just emerging from colonial rule” is a clear attempt to justify the Arab refusal of the U.N. Partition Plan. Those poor “Arab nations” that have been suffering due to outsiders colonizing their “nations” simply could not accept another “colonial” entity, the Jews, entering the region.

But the truth is that with the exception of Egypt, which was not colonized, none of the neighboring countries that rejected the partition plan had been established states before World War I. Yes, the post-war mandates of the League of Nations gave control in the region to the British and the French for a few decades, but this was in place of the Ottoman Empire that had controlled the region for centuries. Thus, the image of countries emerging from long-standing colonial rule as a subtle attempt to justify their objection to the Partition Plan is simply false.

Obama tells the story of the establishment of the State of Israel in two sentences, which are nothing short of outright revisionist history.
Obama tells the story of the establishment of the State of Israel in two sentences, which are nothing short of outright revisionist history: “As Britain withdrew, the two sides quickly fell into war. And with Jewish militias claiming victory in 1948, the state of Israel was officially born.”

Wow. I don’t even know where to begin. The two sides didn’t “fall into war” when Britain withdrew; the two sides had been fighting for decades, with the Arabs – who rejected more than half-a-century of efforts to establish a Jewish state in the region – attacking the Jews, and the Jews defending themselves. When the British then left the area in May 1948, the Jews made a very difficult decision to declare their independence based on the U.N. Partition Plan, which gave the right for a Jewish state alongside an Arab state.

There were no “Jewish militias claiming victory.” There was a unified Jewish army that formed the Israel Defense Forces, which knew that the surrounding Arab countries would begin an all-out assault to destroy Israel the moment its Jewish leadership declared an independent fledgling Jewish state. And that is exactly what the Arab armies did. The new State of Israel fought off that assault for months, emerging in 1949 both weakened and fragile.

Obama’s perspective on the formation of the State of Israel no doubt affected his foreign policy regarding the Jewish state. If one sees Israel as a colonial force occupying the land as a result of its armed militias, then it will be treated as an outsider that wronged others to establish itself as a state. The former president misleads others into believing this, as well.

The most disingenuous sentence of Obama’s history of Israel is in his description of what happened during the 30 years following Israel’s establishment: “For the next three decades, Israel would engage in a succession of conflicts with its Arab neighbors ….”

What? I had to read that sentence many times because I could not believe that a president of the United States could write such misleading, deceptive and damaging words about his country’s close ally.

Israel did not “engage” in any conflict with the surrounding Arab countries. The Arab armies and their terrorists attacked Israel again and again, and Israelis fought to defend themselves.

A straightforward history of Middle East wars involving Israel yields this basic truth. Facts are facts, and the former president’s misrepresentation of Israel as a country that sought conflict instead of peace – one that willingly engaged in wars with the Arabs – does an injustice to peace-seeking Israel and riles up anti-Israel sentiment.

Obama’s description of the 1967 Six-Day War continues this revisionism: “A greatly outnumbered Israeli military routed the combined armies of Egypt, Jordan and Syria. In the process, Israel seized control of the West Bank and East Jerusalem from Jordan, the Gaza Strip and the Sinai Peninsula from Egypt, and the Golan Heights from Syria.”

Here he fails to address what led up to the war, when all those Arab armies gathered along Israel’s borders and declared their intention to wipe it off the map. He doesn’t describe Israel’s pleading with Jordan not to enter the war, nor that Jordan altogether had no legal rights to the West Bank, which it occupied in 1948 and annexed against international law in 1950.

Most significantly, Obama fails to mention Israel’s willingness, immediately after the war, to withdraw from all the areas that it won in its defensive battle in exchange for peace; and by extension, he also fails to tell of the Arab League’s “Three No’s” in response to that offer: no peace with Israel, no recognition of Israel and no negotiations with Israel.

This omission serves once again to portray Israel as the aggressive occupier that seeks conflict and not peace.

The former president continues with another outright falsehood, which helps give insight into his policies regarding Israeli settlements in the West Bank.

The “rise of the PLO (the Palestinian Liberation Organization)” was a “result” of the Six-Day War he writes. That makes it seem like the Palestinian liberation movement, including its violent and murderous attacks against Israelis, was only a result of Israel’s taking control over the West Bank, eastern Jerusalem and the Gaza Strip.

It strengthens the message that if only Israel would vacate these areas, there would be peace between Israel and the Palestinians. This is what spurs leaders around the world to suggest that Israeli settlements in these areas are the obstacle to peace in the region.

But there is one flaw with this story and logic. It’s not true. The PLO was established in 1964 – three years before Israel was in control of any of those “occupied” areas and three years before there were any settlements.

What exactly was this Palestinian organization liberating at that time? Is there any conclusion other than the liberation of the Jewish state in its entirety? What other option could there be?

This is why the “Free Palestine” movement chants, “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free.” They are against the existence of Israel anywhere between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea. They see such a state as a colonial enterprise with armed militias grabbing the land of others, just as Obama leads readers to believe when describing the formation of the state.

The false description of the PLO rising after 1967 serves the narrative that the “occupation” and the settlements are the cause of the conflict, and this, no doubt, had a direct impact on Obama’s “not one brick” policy, including freezing settlement construction, in an effort to bring about peace between Israel and the Palestinians.

Obama describes the failed Camp David accords of 2000, in which former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak offered the Palestinians more than 90 percent of what they were asking for. “Arafat demanded more concessions, however, and talks collapsed in recrimination,” he writes. But the talks didn’t simply “collapse.” Sixty-six days later, Arafat unleashed the Second Intifada, in which 1,137 Israeli civilians were murdered and 8,341 were maimed by Yasser Arafat-funded terrorists who blew themselves up in Israeli buses and cafes.

Don’t trust my word on this. Mamduh Nofal, former military commander of the Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine, revealed that following Camp David, “Arafat told us, ‘Now we are going to fight so we must be ready.’”

In addition, Hamas leader Mahmoud al-Zahar said in September 2010 that in the summer of 2000, as soon as Arafat understood that all of his demands would not be met, he instructed Hamas, Fatah and the Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades to begin attacking Israel. And Mosab Hassan Yousef, son of Hamas founder Sheikh Hassan Yousef, has verified that the Second Intifada was pre-planned by Arafat.

Not only does Obama fail to accurately connect the Second Intifada to Arafat’s not receiving everything the Palestinians asked for at Camp David – demands that would have prevented Israel from being able to defend itself against Palestinian terrorism – but he seems to place the blame for the intifada on Israel.

He describes the September 2000 visit of Israel’s opposition leader and subsequent prime minister, Ariel Sharon, to the Temple Mount in Jerusalem as “provocative” and a “stunt” that “enraged Arabs near and far.”

But Obama neglects to mention that Sharon only visited there after Israel’s Interior Ministry received assurances from the security chief of the Palestinian Authority that no uproar would arise as a result of the visit.

In fact, Jibril Rajoub, head of Preventive Security in the West Bank, confirmed that Sharon could visit the sensitive area as long as he did not enter a mosque or pray publicly, rules to which Sharon adhered.

Obama describes the Temple Mount as “one of Islam’s holiest sites,” making no mention that it is the holiest site in Judaism.
Even more incredibly, Obama describes the Temple Mount as “one of Islam’s holiest sites,” making no mention that it is the holiest site in Judaism.

An innocent reader who is unfamiliar with the region and its history reads this and concludes that it was simply wrong for a Jewish leader to walk onto a Muslim religious site. On the other hand, if he or she knew that it is the holiest site for Jews, then they would more likely wonder why there was anything wrong with Sharon’s having gone there – except Obama omits that part, leading anyone to conclude that Sharon was in the wrong.

That omission, together with the exclusion of Arafat’s plans for the intifada right after negotiations at Camp David failed, can only lead one to conclude that Israel was responsible for the five years of bloodshed during the Second Intifada.

Obama’s history lesson continues with the tension between Israel and Gaza. Remarkably, he makes zero mention of the Israeli disengagement from Gaza in 2005, when Israel pulled out all of its troops from the strip while forcing 9,000 Jewish citizens to leave their homes.

Anyone reading the president’s description of the wars between Israel and Hamas would never know that Israel no longer “occupies” Gaza, and that the Palestinians have been free to build a wondrous “Israeli-free” Palestinian state there for the last 15 years. That omission is glaring.

Finally, Obama’s misleading words describing Israel’s response to Hamas rocket fire on its civilian population only serves to inflame and incite anti-Israel sentiment worldwide. That response, he writes, included “Israeli Apache helicopters leveling entire neighborhoods” in Gaza – Apache helicopters that he identifies as coming from the United States, a subtle or not-too-subtle questioning of whether the United States should be providing Israel with military aid if it is used in this manner.

More importantly, what does he mean by “leveling entire neighborhoods,” other than to imply that Israel indiscriminately bombs Gazan neighborhoods, willfully murdering innocent people? And what human being on Earth wouldn’t be riled up to condemn Israel for such inhumane activity?

The problem is that it’s false. Israel targets terrorist leaders and the rockets that they fire into Israeli cities. Tragically, Hamas leaders use innocent Palestinians as human shields by hiding behind them in civilian neighborhoods, and by launching rockets into Israel from there and from hospitals and mosques.

Israel does its best not to kill innocent people, even airdropping leaflets announcing an imminent airstrike, and calls off missions to destroy rocket launchers or kill terrorist leaders when there are too many civilians in the area. Israel most certainly does not launch retaliatory attacks that aimlessly “level” entire neighborhoods.

I have no problem with criticism of Israel. We can debate the issues in intellectually honest discussions, and in the end, we may have to agree to disagree about Israel’s policies. But no one should accept a book that is filled with historical inaccuracies that invariably lead innocent and unknowing readers to reach false conclusions. Such a devastating book has real-life ramifications and consequences.

It is terribly disappointing. I surely would have expected truth, accuracy and fairness from Barack Obama, America’s 44th president. But the falsehoods and inaccuracies in this memoir only feed the theory that Obama was, in fact, anti-Israel. Now, through A Promised Land, he seeks to convince others to join him.
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 67868
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 75
Location : Wales UK

https://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

OBAMA AGAIN  Empty Re: OBAMA AGAIN

Post  Admin on Sat 21 Nov 2020, 9:29 pm

https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2020/11/20/obama-tells-jimmy-kimmel-we-can-always-send-the-navy-seals-to-remove-trump-from-white-house/?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_term=daily&utm_campaign=20201120
Obama Tells Jimmy Kimmel: ‘We Can Always Send the Navy SEALS’ to Remove Trump from White House
27,123
Former US President Barack Obama speaks at a drive-in rally as he campaigns for Democratic presidential candidate former Vice President Joe Biden in Miami, Florida on November 2, 2020. (Photo by CHANDAN KHANNA / AFP) (Photo by CHANDAN KHANNA/AFP via Getty Images)
DAVID NG20 Nov 202020,249
2:18
Former President Barack Obama told ABC’s left-wing late night host Jimmy Kimmel that “we can always send the Navy SEALs” to physically remove President Donald Trump from the White House.

Obama made the remark during an appearance Thursday on Jimmy Kimmel Live! to promote his new memoir A Promised Land. When asked by Kimmel if the White House has any secret spots where “someone could hide” if they don’t want to leave, Obama replied: “Well, I think we can always send the Navy SEALS in there to dig him out.”

Kimmel also asked if it will be weird to call Joe Biden “Mr. President.” “No,” Obama replied, “I’ve already called him Mr. President Elect.”

Earlier in the conversation, Kimmel suggested that it is perhaps too early to assume that Biden won the election. President Trump is contesting the tallies in key swing states and has vowed to fight in court, asserting that there was fraud and that the election was rigged.
“Do you feel that when you congratulated Biden and Senator Harris that you were premature in doing that?” Kimmel asked.
“No, I thought I was right on time,” Obama replied.

Obama also praised former President George W. Bush, whom he called a “patriot.”

“When I came in, we were in the middle of a big crisis, the financial crisis. George W. Bush, he and I had obviously big policy differences, but he’s a good man, he’s a patriot,” Obama said. “And he ordered everybody on his team to work seamlessly with us on the transition. Could not have been more gracious. Could not have been more helpful. And that actually helped us be able to get a head start on trying to stem what could have been a great depression instead of a great recession.”

Jimmy Kimmel recently called for President Trump to be “arrested” after the commander in chief alleged in a November 5 speech that there was voter fraud in battleground states including Pennsylvania and Georgia.

“It was a litany of lies, threats, just a despicable and incoherent attack on democracy in the United States,” Kimmel said. “At the end of that speech, he should have been arrested.”

Follow David Ng on Twitter @HeyItsDavidNg. Have a tip? Contact me at dng@breitbart.com
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 67868
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 75
Location : Wales UK

https://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

OBAMA AGAIN  Empty Re: OBAMA AGAIN

Post  Admin on Wed 18 Nov 2020, 4:22 pm

#FoxNews #Hannity
Sarah Palin respnds to Barack Obama's latest personal attacks
735,785 views•17 Nov 2020
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qZl5l8_1Sz4

Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 67868
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 75
Location : Wales UK

https://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

OBAMA AGAIN  Empty Re: OBAMA AGAIN

Post  Admin on Fri 07 Aug 2020, 9:02 pm

Obama Again NWO
Fall Of The Republic 1/14 HQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_m-WX3xDQJA
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 67868
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 75
Location : Wales UK

https://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

OBAMA AGAIN  Empty Re: OBAMA AGAIN

Post  Admin on Mon 03 Aug 2020, 1:52 pm

Blaze
NEWS AUGUST 02, 2020
Dr. Alveda King rips Obama for politicizing John Lewis' funeral: Leftists will 'grab at any opportunity'
'President Obama, with word play, took us back to the 1960's'
Mark Wilson/Getty Images
 PAUL SACCA
https://www.theblaze.com/news/alveda-king-obama-john-lewis-funeral?utm_source=theblaze-dailyAM&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Daily-Newsletter__AM%202020-08-03&utm_term=TheBlaze%20Daily%20AM%20-%20last%20270%20days
Former President Barack Obama delivered the eulogy at the funeral of John Lewis in Atlanta on Thursday. While paying tribute to the civil rights pioneer at the famed Ebenezer Baptist Church, Obama utilized the widely-viewed platform to take jabs at President Donald Trump.

POLL: Will Joe Biden still be the Democratic Party's presidential candidate when we get to November?
"As we sit here, there are those in power who are doing their darnedest to discourage people from voting by closing polling locations and targeting minorities…even undermining the postal service in the run-up to an election that's going to be dependent on mail-in ballots so people don't get sick," Obama said of mail-in voting, which Trump has been vehemently against.

"George Wallace may be gone, but we can still witness our federal government sending agents to use tear gas and batons against peaceful demonstrators," Obama said, referring to the pro-segregation Democratic governor of Alabama in the 1960s.

Dr. Alveda King, the niece of civil rights icon Martin Luther King Jr., ripped Obama for politicizing the Lewis funeral service.


"Well, I guess we should have expected that the Left, including President Obama, would take that occasion for a political moment," King said during an interview on Fox News' "Fox & Friends." "They'll grab at any opportunity, that's to be understood."

"I have chosen not to politicize the death of congressman Lewis, but to remember him as a peaceful, nonviolent warrior, and encourage everyone to resolve our conflicts peacefully," King said of Lewis, who at the age of 23 was a keynote speaker at 1963's March on Washington, where Martin Luther King Jr. delivered his powerful "I Have a Dream" speech.

"However, President Obama, with word play, took us back to the 1960's, and that was a time when segregation was still on the books, segregation was still legal, and those in power, some of them were trying to enforce that and keep that," King added. "Today, when the National Guard goes in, sent by the president for example, or the state troopers, they're trying to protect the people of America in every community and to save lives and protect people. There is a totally distinct difference."

"Also implying without calling any names, he was very clever not to call any names, saying that there was an effort to undermine the voting process," King said. "You know, actually President Trump is saying, people, please pay attention, we do want you to vote, use your absentee ballots, go to the polls."

"He's even encouraged, you know, people to be poll watchers and poll workers and that kind of thing. President Trump is not trying to suppress the vote," she continued. "As a matter of fact, you can see in my community, I'm telling everybody, make sure you vote, register to vote, pastors and leaders, encourage your people to vote. We do want people to vote safely and we need the voting process to be fair, and so to politicize the funeral of a peaceful warrior, I mean, I guess they grabbed at an opportunity to be political."
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 67868
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 75
Location : Wales UK

https://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

OBAMA AGAIN  Empty Re: OBAMA AGAIN

Post  Admin on Sat 01 Aug 2020, 10:21 am

LIVE: Barack Obama delivers Eulogy at John Lewis Funeral

59,187 views•Streamed live on 30 Jul 2020
WUSA9
51.6K subscribers
Former President Barack Obama will deliver the eulogy for Lewis, who died earlier this month at age 80. Former Presidents Bill Clinton and George W. Bush are also speaking, as well as House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=noPSKqIU2iI

Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 67868
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 75
Location : Wales UK

https://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

OBAMA AGAIN  Empty Re: OBAMA AGAIN

Post  Admin on Tue 16 Jun 2020, 1:25 pm

https://israelunwired.com/famous-african-americans-admit-shocking-facts-about-racism/
Famous African Americans admit shocking facts about racism
By Phil Schneider - June 15, 2020 5373 0
Does racism exist in the United States? Or course – it exists in a country with hundreds of millions of people. Is it a major issue today? Well, actually, no. It is not a major issue in comparison to other issues that are much greater issues. For example, are personal responsibility and family values more important than issues of racism? Absolutely.ESTC
WATCH cnn https://israelunwired.com/famous-african-americans-admit-shocking-facts-about-racism/
The issues today among the young African American population is not systemic racism. This is what so many networks will speak about. But as Roman J. Israel explains, “They are not locking up the 7 year olds.” So, why is this the case? It is because of the breakdown of the family unit in the United States. Is this due to a breakdown of family values in the United States in general? Perhaps. In many big cities today, there are astoundingly high numbers of broken families. This is not due to systemic racism, but due to systemic family breakdown. It is not merely an issue among black people. It is an issue that crosses all races and colors.


The next time that someone says that the United States is a racist country, remember the following facts: The northern states in the United States fought against the Confederacy in order to remove slavery from the United States. This was led by a white president. The United States voted into law the Civil Rights Law in order to change the norms of disrespect and discrimination against black people. This was done by a majority of white voters in Congress and the Senate. Oh and yes, it was enforced by a majority of white men in the police departments across the United States. This had ramifications that brought up the norms of respect and openness to the entire world for black people.


And one more thing, Barack Obama was elected President of the United States – twice. When the African American population deals with their core issues that start in the home, then there won’t be any need for policemen and policewomen – many of whom are African American – to make sure that neighborhoods are not burned down and looted.
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 67868
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 75
Location : Wales UK

https://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

OBAMA AGAIN  Empty Re: OBAMA AGAIN

Post  Admin on Wed 10 Jun 2020, 7:53 pm

https://www.jihadwatch.org/2020/06/obama-used-national-security-to-spy-on-americans-opposed-to-islamic-terrorists?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=the_2020_06_10_jihad_watch_daily_digest&utm_term=2020-06-10
Obama Used National Security to Spy on Americans Opposed to Islamic Terrorists
JUN 9, 2020 8:00 AM BY DANIEL GREENFIELD22 COMMENTS
Obamagate redefined opposition to Islamic terrorism as a national security threat.


We know when Obamagate ended, but we don’t know when the policy of spying on Americans began. The tangled roots of the domestic surveillance of political opponents by the NSA predate the alarmism about Russia. Tracing them back into the fetid swamp takes us not toward Moscow, but to Tehran.
The first public revelation that the White House was spying on high level members of the political opposition came in 2015. Members of Congress had been eavesdropped on as part of an operation to sabotage Prime Minister Netanyahu’s campaign against the Iran Deal. The Israeli leader and his entire country had earlier been targeted by a massive spy campaign to stop Israel from taking out Iran’s nukes.


But the new wave of surveillance was no longer just against a potential Israeli attack on Iran, but was part of a political campaign to win the domestic argument to aid Iran and legalize its nuclear program.


The Wall Street Journal reported that by 2013, surveillance of Netanyahu was focused on protecting the Iran nuclear negotiations. Netanyahu’s invitation to address Congress caught the White House by surprise and the surveillance was not only directed at Israelis or even pro-Israel Americans, but members of Congress who were skeptical that the Islamic terror regime would ever scuttle its nukes.


The Iran Deal ushered in a surveillance shift from monitoring the former allies that Obama wanted to toss overboard, to monitoring Americans who were friendly to those governments, and then leading members of the political opposition, and finally members of an incoming administration. Obama and his associates had redefined national security as the pursuit of his dangerous foreign policy, and the new national security threats were administration critics who were surveilled in order to entrap them.


Surveillance had morphed from spying on Obama’s political opponents to conspiring to lock them up.


General Flynn had been a key opponent of the Iran policy, as detailed by Lee Smith in How Russiagate Began With Obama’s Iran Deal Domestic Spying Campaign. Flynn’s arrival not only threatened the Iran Deal, but the politicized intelligence agencies that had been covering for Iran even during the Bush days. Beyond protecting the Iran Deal and Obama’s legacy, the fake intelligence machine was defending itself.


Flynn had already been forced out once. His return wasn’t supposed to happen and was seen as a threat.


Oubai Shahbandar, who had worked for the DIA and served on the ground in Iraq as a strategic analyst, noted that Flynn had warned Obama that Al-Qaeda in Iraq would make a comeback, “Flynn’s prophetic warnings would play out exactly as he’d warned shortly after he was fired.”


It was bad enough that Obama’s foreign policy vets and intelligence cronies had failed. The prospect of having Flynn return to take advantage of their mistakes and wreck their credibility was unthinkable.


The pretext for taking down Flynn was generated when he called Ambassador Kislyak about an anti-Israel resolution coming up at the UN. The Obama administration had played a key role in generating these shadow resolutions by other countries to pressure Israel. The Jewish State, along with the UAE, the Saudis, and Egypt, and any Trump associates friendly to them, had become targets in a shadow war meant to keep Obama’s foreign policy in place even under the incoming Trump administration.


Obamagate was waged to protect a foreign policy based around Iran and the Muslim Brotherhood.


That was why Walid Phares, a Trump adviser, was also investigated by the FBI and the Mueller team for his friendliness to President Sisi’s anti-Islamist government in Egypt. Flynn and Phares were investigated because they posed a threat to Obama’s pro-Islamist foreign policy. That was Susan Rice’s pretext for unmasking the names of Trump officials meeting with the crown prince of the United Arab Emirates.


The Obama administration had not only redefined support for Islamic terror states as being in our country’s national interest, but it also redefined opposition to Islamic terror as a national security threat.


Flynn and Phares were targeted because they were critics of the Iran Deal and the Brotherhood.


After Obama and his cronies had dismantled counterterrorism and crippled the military, they took national security into an inverted Orwellian world in which terrorism was national security, and national security was terrorism, and members of the incoming Trump administration were the greatest national security threat because they opposed Obama’s foreign policy of aiding Islamic terrorists.


Flynn and Phares, in their own ways, struck at the twin Islamist hearts of that foreign policy.


The Arab Spring and the Brotherhood’s ascendancy had been crucial to Obama’s vision of a new Middle East. Obama had been pushing regime change in Egypt as early as his 2002 Daley Plaza speech, in which he invoked regime change for Egypt and Saudi Arabia, but not, of course, for Iran. The Brotherhood’s collapse across the region had been personally humiliating for Obama and his people hadn’t given up their dreams of a Muslim Brotherhood Reconquista in Egypt. Phares was a threat to those dreams.


Iran was Obama’s last shot at his grand strategy to realign America foreign policy toward Islamist terror states. This was not just one agreement, but a desperate attempt to turn back the clock to the Cairo Speech, before ISIS, the counter-revolutions in Egypt and Tunisia, and the growing tilt of the Saudis and the UAE toward Israel and against the Islamists and Iran. Obama’s entire foreign policy was on the line.


Having Flynn on duty risked sabotaging what Obama saw as his only surviving foreign policy success. And when Flynn directly intervened to stop an Obama shadow UN resolution aimed at Israel, his cronies in the intelligence community struck back hard, taking revenge over Flynn’s effort to protect Israel, and marking their territory from Egypt to Iran, while seeking to hijack the incoming Trump administration.


The peaceful transition that traditionally separated the American political system from those of failed states was coming apart as the Obama administration, no longer content with covert eavesdropping or media leaks, actively went to war over foreign policy with the Trump administration. This was not a mere Watergate. It was a civil war being waged within the limited confines of Washington D.C.


The weapons of the national security state were being used to fight a war over who would be able to define national security with intelligence community figures targeting an incoming intelligence community figure. Conflicts that were once conducted with media leaks had gone well beyond them.


But the pattern of media leaks did suggest a link between Obama’s surveillance of members of Congress and the spying on Flynn.


As Smith notes, “Adam Entous was offered the leak of the Dec. 29 call early on”. Entous was also the writer who ‘broke’ the story of Obama’s spying on Congress and pro-Israel activists for the Wall Street Journal while spinning the material in a way that justified this latter-day Watergate. Washington D.C. operatives usually have favored reporters that they leak stories to for the right political spin.


It seems likely that whoever leaked the Congress surveillance story also leaked Flynn’s phone call.


As I noted in 2018, “Spygate was the warped afterbirth of our failure to meaningfully confront Islamic terrorism. Instead, the political allies of the terrorists and the failed watchmen who allowed them to strike so many times, got together to shoot the messengers warning about the terror threat.”


The Obama administration betrayed America. It sold out the soldiers in the field, and then their commanders, and when it lost power, it went to war against the civilian leadership using the tools that had been traditionally reserved for the terrorists that it had refused to take on and defeat.


Obama didn’t just corrupt our national security system to wage war on his successor administration, he did it to protect the Islamist terrorist enemies of this country: Iran and the Muslim Brotherhood.


Instead of fighting Islamic terrorists, Obama used the national security state to spy on their opponents, beginning with pro-Israel Americans, and concluding with Trump allies in a horrifying act of treason.


Share this: MORE https://www.jihadwatch.org/2020/06/obama-used-national-security-to-spy-on-americans-opposed-to-islamic-terrorists?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=the_2020_06_10_jihad_watch_daily_digest&utm_term=2020-06-10
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 67868
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 75
Location : Wales UK

https://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

OBAMA AGAIN  Empty Re: OBAMA AGAIN

Post  Admin on Wed 27 May 2020, 10:44 pm

https://israelunwired.com/covid-19-and-racism-have-nothing-to-do-with-each-other-unless-youre-obama/
COVID-19 and racism have nothing to do with each other – unless you’re Obama
Wow, this is shocking and not so shocking at the same time - that Obama would say something like this. What kind of commencement speech is this, anyway? Ben Shapiro responds perfectly.
Well, Obama made headlines again. He gave a commencement speech for those graduating. And he somehow got on the topic of COVID-19 and…racism?
By Leah Rosenberg - May 24, 2020 
Why Connect COVID-19 & Racism?
It really makes no sense. COVID-19 has nothing to do with racism. Why even connect the two? Why make something about racism when it is most definitely not? Because that’s what some people do to fuel the fire that should never have existed to begin with.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=57&v=dx_pzAT5yKQ&feature=emb_logo
President Obama Blames Coronavirus Disparities On Systemic Racism; Shapiro Responds
Ben Shapiro responded to former President Barak Obama’s commencement speech perfectly. The commencement speech should have been about something different. Obama had the opportunity to say whatever he wanted, and he chose to badmouth President Trump and talk about racism and coronavirus. There are so many issues with what he did, and Shapiro addresses the problems with the speech.

Lying and saying racism is the reason for coronavirus hitting a certain community harder is not beneficial for anyone – especially not for graduates looking for inspiration for their futures. Instead, it feeds them lies and can breed anger and resentment. There is nothing inspiring and uplifting about that.

Belittling Racism
If you think about it, Obama belittled racism. Because he spread a false narrative about racism and America and created a story about a racist situation where there was none, he undermined situations when there truly IS racism.

How can a former president do such a thing? For people who have experienced real racism, they should be outraged by Obama’s speech. They should really be outraged by Obama in general.


Racism is real. It exists. But America is not a racist country as a whole. And the disparities of those affected by COVID-19 have nothing to do with racism, as Shapiro so brilliantly pointed out.
Let’s all try to make sure we have our facts straight before assuming that a former president is saying something truthful. Because sadly, it seems that his personal agenda is more important than honesty.
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 67868
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 75
Location : Wales UK

https://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

OBAMA AGAIN  Empty Re: OBAMA AGAIN

Post  Admin on Tue 19 May 2020, 11:30 pm

https://israelunwired.com/the-biggest-political-scandal-of-our-lifetime/
The biggest political scandal of our lifetime
By Phil Schneider - May 19, 2020 4083 0

Did President Obama and many of his closest advisors and officials actually plan to destroy Mike Flynn during the transition period between President Trump’s election and the actual inauguration? As of now, it seems that this was indeed an intentional plan to blemish the reputation of President Trump. As Kate McFarlane argued, she and Mike Flynn were just the small fish. But in truth, what Barack Obama and his advisors tried to do was to make sure that President Trump’s reputation would be tarnished from the get-go.
Why OBAMAGATE is Such a HUGE Scandal...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=11&v=etNh2NHJhkM&feature=emb_logo

Donate Today And Promote This Video To Thousands
Is this worse than Watergate, where President Nixon was found to have been aware of an attempt to cheat against the Democrats in the 1972 election? There is definitely grounds to this argument. The Obama administration was an idealistic administration that truly was focused on transforming the United States of America and the whole world. In truth, alot was indeed done in the 8 years under Obama to accomplish this. But when Donald Trump was elected under a platform that was squarely based on undoing most of what President Obama deemed accomplishments, this most certainly bothered Obama and many others.

On the national security front, people like General Mike Flynn, people with seemingly perfect records, were one of the problems that Obama and his advisors saw. They perceived that Donald Trump was building up his reputation based on the credibility of Generals like Flynn. They saw in him the perfect person to take down, and that seems to be exactly what he and his advisors did.


In the end, the Obama administration will probably not be viewed as a corrupt 8 years. It will probably be remembered as the progressive high point of the United States. And where did that bring us? The debates will continue. But the spying on Mike Flynn and the fictional accusation about Russian collusion will probably be judged by Democrat and Republican alike as one big hoax.
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 67868
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 75
Location : Wales UK

https://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

OBAMA AGAIN  Empty Re: OBAMA AGAIN

Post  Admin on Fri 15 May 2020, 4:44 pm

Ben Shapiro just made everyone thankful Obama isn't president anymore
shapiro-obama-email
Ben Shapiro exposes the real corruption that happened in the White House. He calls out Obama's bluff. At least someone is willing to call out Obama, and yes - it still matters today! The mainstream media still praises him!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=10&v=x8QoR6kVRQI&feature=emb_logo

Ben Shapiro Breaks Down #Obamagate
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=10&v=x8QoR6kVRQI&feature=emb_logo
Ben Shapiro slammed Obama for his complete corruption and hypocrisy. It is really absurd the way Obama “can do nothing wrong.”

Boost this video to reach up to 1000 people
Ben Shapiro Calls Out Obama
Obama and his posse like to criticize President Trump. But who will stand up and call out Obama for all of HIS corruption? Who will condemn the Obama administration for its hypocrisy? Ben Shapiro, of course. The mainstream media might ignore the truth, but Shapiro definitely won’t.

Somehow, Obama can do nothing wrong – the media praised and continues to praise him for everything. 
And President Trump, according to the media and the Left, only does wrong. And obviously, according to Obama he is the worst thing to enter the White House.

But what are the facts? Shapiro does an excellent job at breaking down what really has happened throughout the past few years.

What Has Happened to Politics?
Instead of politics being about the American people, it has turned into a game of who can be better. It has turned into a selfish endeavor to be the most powerful. If Obama and his people really cared about Americans, they would not chase after Trump and everyone in the White House who they disagree with. They do not have to agree with everything that President Trump says and does. But what they do is another level, and it is just wrong.

And then Obama acts like he was a perfect president. It is as if Obama did nothing wrong and all his policies saved the world. And the thing is, that cannot be farther from the truth. Obama endangered everyone: Israel, America, and the free world. His administration did many illegal things, yet they are trying to pin corruption on the Trump administration instead.
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 67868
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 75
Location : Wales UK

https://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

OBAMA AGAIN  Empty Re: OBAMA AGAIN

Post  Admin on Sun 10 May 2020, 3:08 pm

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/05/08/michael-flynn-documents-obama-knew-details-call-russian-ambassador/?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_term=daily&utm_campaign=20200508
Documents: Obama Knew Details of Michael Flynn’s Call with Russian Ambassador
51,407
lawsuitAlex Wong/Getty Images
KRISTINA WONG8 May 202010,391
4:31
Then-President Barack Obama was intimately aware of the details of December 2016 intercepted phone calls between President-elect Donald Trump’s incoming National Security Adviser, Michael Flynn, and then-Russian Ambassador Sergei Kislyak, according to court documents released Thursday.

The former president’s knowledge and role in his administration’s investigations of the Trump campaign have long been an open question. The revelation puts the former president right in the center of the last administration’s efforts to investigate and target Flynn, whom the Justice Department just dropped their case against on Thursday. Obama had appointed Flynn as director of the Defense Intelligence Agency but had fired him in 2014, and he had reportedly warned Trump not to hire Flynn.
The newly released documents from the government’s motion to dismiss their case against Flynn show, however, that at a January 5, 2017, Oval Office meeting with then-Vice President Joe Biden, then-CIA Director John Brennan, then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, then-FBI Director James Comey, then-Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates, Obama had asked Comey and Yates to “stay behind.”

Obama told them he had “learned of the information about Flynn” and his conversation with Kislyak, where they discussed sanctions his administration had levied against Russia. (A memo penned by then-National Security Adviser Susan Rice also showed that Biden stayed behind as well.)

Obama “specified he did not want any additional information on the matter, but was seeking information on whether the White House should be treating Flynn any differently, given the information.”

“Yates had no idea what the president was talking about, but figured it out based on the conversation. Yates recalled Comey mentioning the Logan Act, but can’t recall if he specified there was an ‘investigation.’ Comey did not talk about prosecution in the meeting,” the documents said.

“It was not clear to Yates from where the President first received the information. Yates did not recall Comey’s response to the President’s question about how to treat Flynn. She was so surprised by the information she was hearing that she was having a hard time processing it and listening to the conversation at the same time,” the documents said:
Byron York
✔
@ByronYork
The January 5, 2017 meeting in which Sally Yates said she learned of Flynn-Kislyak call from President Obama himself--Susan Rice and VP Joe Biden were in that meeting, too, per Rice's famous memo-to-self.
9:34 PM - May 7, 2020
Twitter Ads info and privacy
7,992 people are talking about this
The documents also showed how the Obama FBI justified an investigation into Flynn beginning August 2016, just a few months before the election. The reasons were that Flynn was “cited as an adviser to the Trump team on foreign policy issues February 2016; he has ties to various state-affiliated entities of the Russian Federation, as reported by open-source information; and he traveled to Russia in December 2015, as reported by open-source information.”

The FBI’s Washington office was prepared to close that investigation due to not finding “derogatory” information, but then-FBI agent Peter Strzok pushed to keep the investigation open.


 
Strzok and another agent interviewed Flynn at the White House on January 24, 2017, to ask him about his phone calls with Kislyak. Recently released notes from the DOJ showed agents discussing whether their goal during that interview was to get him to admit violating the Logan Act or to get him to lie so that he could be prosecuted or fired. The FBI already had transcripts of Flynn’s call, raising questions about if the FBI was simply trying to catch him in a perjury trap.

A handwritten note, presumably from then-head of FBI counterintelligence Bill Priestap, said, “What is our goal? Truth/Admission or to get him to lie, so we can prosecute him or get him fired?”

According to an interview summary by Strzok and the other agent, they did not detect that Flynn was lying or believed he was lying. However, later, special counsel Robert Mueller would charge him with one count of lying to federal prosecutors, and Flynn pleaded guilty as part of a plea deal. Flynn later requested to withdraw that guilty plea, citing pressure from prosecutors.

On Thursday, the DOJ moved to drop the case against Flynn, concluding that an FBI interview of Flynn related to his calls with Kislyak that led to one charge of lying to federal investigators was “conducted without any legitimate investigative basis.”

Follow Breitbart News’s Kristina Wong on Twitter or on Facebook.
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 67868
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 75
Location : Wales UK

https://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

OBAMA AGAIN  Empty Re: OBAMA AGAIN

Post  Admin on Fri 08 May 2020, 10:17 pm

https://gellerreport.com/2020/05/obama-knew-russia-hoax.html/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=facebook
WATCH: Obama KNEW of wiretapped Flynn phone calls, Russia investigation transcripts show
Walls are closing in on Obama.


Mollie
✔
@MZHemingway
"A clearer picture is emerging of the drastic steps that were taken to accomplish Obama’s goal in the following weeks and months... At each major point in the operation, explosive media leaks were a key strategy in the operation to take down Trump." https://thefederalist.com/2020/05/08/obama-biden-oval-office-meeting-on-january-5-was-key-to-entire-anti-trump-operation/#.XrWjhYynQOZ.twitter


Obama, Biden Oval Office Meeting On January 5 Was Key To Entire Anti-Trump Operation
In light of the newly declassified documents, it is clear that understanding what happened in that January 5 Oval Office meeting is essential to understanding the corrupt operation against the Trump...

thefederalist.com
3,968
7:23 PM - May 8, 2020
Twitter Ads info and privacy
2,468 people are talking about this



Russia investigation transcripts show Obama knew of wiretapped Flynn phone calls
May. 08, 2020

Former DOJ official Francey Hakes reacts.


Obama knew details of wiretapped Flynn phone calls, surprising top DOJ official in meeting with Biden, declassified docs show
By Gregg Re, FOX News, May 8, 2020:

President Obama was aware of the details of then-incoming national security adviser Michael Flynn’s intercepted December 2016 phone calls with then-Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak, apparently surprising then-Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates, according to documents released Thursday as exhibits to the government’s motion to dismiss the Flynn case.

Obama’s unexpectedly intimate knowledge of the details of Flynn’s calls, which the FBI acknowledged at the time were not criminal or even improper, raised eyebrows because of his own history with Flynn — and because top FBI officials secretly discussed whether their goal was to “get [Flynn] fired” when they interviewed him in the White House on January 24, 2017.

Obama personally had warned the Trump administration against hiring Flynn, and made clear he was “not a fan,” according to multiple officials. Obama had fired Flynn as head of the Defense Intelligence Agency in 2014; Obama cited insubordination, while Flynn asserted he was pushed out for his aggressive stance on combating lslamic extremism.

READ THE DOJ’S MOTION TO DISMISS W/ EXHIBITS 

On January 5, 2017, Yates attended an Oval Office meeting with then-FBI Director James Comey, then-Vice President Joe Biden, then-CIA Director John Brennan, and then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, according to the newly declassified documents, including an FD-302 FBI witness report. They were discussing Russian election interference, along with national security adviser Susan Rice and other members of the national security council.

After the briefing, Obama asked Yates and Comey to “stay behind,” and said he had “learned of the information about Flynn” and his conversation with Russia’s ambassador about sanctions. Obama “specified that he did not want any additional information on the matter, but was seeking information on whether the White House should be treating Flynn any differently, given the information.”

A previous memo from Rice stated that Biden also stayed behind after the main briefing had ended.

At that point, the documents showed, “Yates had no idea what the president was talking about, but figured it out based on the conversation. Yates recalled Comey mentioning the Logan Act, but can’t recall if he specified there was an ‘investigation.’ Comey did not talk about prosecution in the meeting.”

The exhibit continues: “It was not clear to Yates from where the President first received the information. Yates did not recall Comey’s response to the President’s question about how to treat Flynn. She was so surprised by the information she was hearing that she was having a hard time processing it and listening to the conversation at the same time.”

Yates, who was fired by the Trump administration after taking the extraordinary step of refusing to defend its travel ban executive order in court, would later say that she was concerned Flynn would be vulnerable to blackmail because of his interactions with Russia.

The Logan Act, an obscure statute, has never been used successfully in a criminal prosecution; enacted in 1799 in an era before telephones, it was intended to prevent individuals from falsely claiming to represent the United States government abroad. In its motion to dismiss Flynn’s case on Thursday, the DOJ noted that the law was an unserious dead letter.

Also released as an exhibit Thursday was a head-turning two-page document outlining why the FBI opened its counterintelligence probe into Flynn in August 2016. The FBI offered only three reasons: that Flynn was “cited as an adviser to the Trump team on foreign policy issues February 2016; he has ties to various state-affiliated entities of the Russian Federation, as reported by open-source information; and he traveled to Russia in December 2015, as reported by open-source information.”

The “state-affiliated entities” line was an apparent reference to Flynn’s paid appearance at a Moscow gala for Russian state TV network RT in 2015. Flynn also reportedly received thousands more in expenses covered by the network and in speech fees from other Russian firms, including some payments that he initially didn’t disclose on ethics forms. The payments raised eyebrows on Capitol Hill, although Republicans pointed out that many other prominent officials, including Bill Clinton, have traveled to Russia for highly paid speaking engagements.


Glenn Greenwald
✔
@ggreenwald
I'd still like to understand what was improper about the incoming National Security Advisor of a newly elected administration calling his Russian counterpart to try to tamp down tensions in the weeks before he took office.

3,624
9:27 PM - May 7, 2020
Twitter Ads info and privacy
1,379 people are talking about this
Ex-FBI agent Peter Strzok approved opening a full-fledged national security probe on those apparently weak grounds, according to the FBI document, even though Flynn’s speaking engagements in Russia were public knowledge. DOJ guidelines call for the FBI to open such counterintelligence probes only when there is a reasonable and articulable basis to believe that criminal activity has occurred or that a threat to national security may exist.

Strzok later would intervene and push to keep the Flynn probe open in January 2017, even after the FBI’s Washington office signaled it wanted to close it because no “derogatory” information had been unearthed after consulting with other intelligence agencies in an exhaustive search.

On the recommendation of U.S. Attorney Jeff Jensen, who served as an FBI agent for more than a decade, the Justice Department on Thursday moved to drop its case against Flynn. The stunning development came after internal memos were released raising serious questions about the nature of the investigation that led to Flynn’s late 2017 guilty plea of lying to the FBI as his legal fees mounted.

JAMES GAGLIANO, FMR FBI SWAT OFFICER, CHANGES MIND, NOW SAYS FLYNN WAS ‘RAILROADED’

One of the documents was a top official’s handwritten memo debating whether the FBI’s “goal” was “to get him to lie, so we can prosecute him or get him fired”; other materials showed efforts by Strzok to pursue Flynn on increasingly flimsy legal grounds.


Undercover Huber
@JohnWHuber
 · May 7, 2020
DOJ’s exhibits provide for the first time the FBI’s Electronic Communication (EC) opening a full counterintelligence case against @GenFlynn on Aug 16, 2016

And as expected, it’s a complete joke.


Undercover Huber
@JohnWHuber
Here’s the 2 page “justification” for opening a full CI case against a 30 year combat veteran, general and former Director of an intelligence agency

1. Foreign policy advisor to Trump
2. Unspecified “ties” to “various” “state-affiliated” entities of Russia
3. Travelled to Russia

View image on TwitterView image on Twitter
2,574
8:31 PM - May 7, 2020
Twitter Ads info and privacy
1,486 people are talking about this
The FBI possessed word-for-word transcripts of Flynn’s December 2016 conversations with Kislyak, and publicly admitted to reviewing those transcripts and clearing Flynn of any wrongdoing.

Both during and before the January 24, 2017 White House interview that led to Flynn’s prosecution for one count of lying to the FBI, the bureau acknowledged having those full transcripts, raising the question of why agents would need to ask Flynn about what he said during the calls with Kislyak, except potentially as a pretext to obtain a false statements charge.

Flynn was accused specifically of giving equivocal and evasive answers to FBI agents in the White House during a casual interview concerning those phone calls, but no transcript of the conversation exists. Instead, after-the-fact FBI notes of the interview with Strzok and Joe Pientka were the primary evidence.

DOJ PROSECUTOR BOOTED FROM FLYNN CASE — APPARENTLY DIDN’T COMPLY WITH COURT ORDER TO TURN OVER KEY DOCS

During the interview, Flynn told the agents “not really” when asked if he had sought to convince Kislyak not to escalate a brewing fight with the U.S. over sanctions imposed by the Obama administration, according to a FD-302 witness report prepared by the FBI. Flynn also demurred when asked if he had asked Russia to veto a U.N. Security Council resolution that condemned Israel’s settlements in the West Bank. The Obama administration abstained in that vote.

At various points, Flynn also suggested that such conversations might have happened or that he could not recall them if they did, according to the 302. The 302 indicated that Flynn apparently was aware his communications had been monitored, and at several points he thanked the FBI agents for reminding him of some of his conversations with Russian officials.

The FBI said Flynn had in fact discussed with Kislyak the need for Russia not to escalate the situation in response to sanctions just imposed by the Obama administration. Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report stated that “Flynn requested that Russia not escalate the situation, not get into ‘tit for tat,’ and only respond to the sanctions in a reciprocal manner.” Flynn did not discuss an effort to undo the Obama sanctions, contrary to some media reports.

Strzok later was removed from then-Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s team when his anti-Trump text messages surfaced, and Pientka now has been under scrutiny for his role in various Trump probes.

Pientka has been scrubbed from the FBI website after Fox News asked the bureau about him, and Republican lawmakers (including Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., and GOP Reps. Jim Jordan and Mike Johnson) are seeking to question him. The FBI told Fox News last year that reporting Pientka’s name was irresponsible and endangered his life for no journalistic purpose.

Video
But, Fox News has previously determined that Pientka was also intimately involved in the probe of former Trump aide Carter Page, which the DOJ has since acknowledged was riddled with fundamental errors and premised on a discredited dossier that the bureau was told could be part of a Russian disinformation campaign.

The FBI’s recently released handwritten notes in advance of the Flynn interview — which the FBI’s former head of counterintelligence Bill Priestap wrote after a meeting with Comey and then-FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, Fox News is told — suggested that agents planned in the alternative to get Flynn “to admit to breaking the Logan Act” when he spoke to Kislyak during the presidential transition period.

“What is our goal?” one of the notes read. “Truth/Admission or to get him to lie, so we can prosecute him or get him fired?”
Another note read, “If we get him to admit to breaking the Logan Act, give facts to DOJ + have them decide.” Constitutional law professor Jonathan Turley called the document’s implications “chilling.”

Earlier Thursday, Brandon Van Grack, a top Justice Department prosecutor and former member of Mueller’s team, withdrew from the Flynn case.

DOJ DROPS FLYNN CASE, AFTER HE SOLD HIS HOME, LOST HIS CAREER

Van Grack also was withdrawing from other unrelated cases as well, raising questions about his future at the DOJ. No explanation was given for Van Grack’s abrupt withdrawal from the Flynn case, which was recorded in a brief filing with the court on Thursday. An administration official told Fox News that Van Grack was still at the DOJ and has not resigned.

Van Grack’s removal from the cases came just days after Fox News reported that the explosive, newly unsealed evidence documenting the FBI’s efforts to target Flynn called into question whether Van Grack compli
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 67868
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 75
Location : Wales UK

https://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

OBAMA AGAIN  Empty Re: OBAMA AGAIN

Post  Admin on Sat 25 Jan 2020, 10:55 pm

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/01/23/obama-portraits-tour-country-2021/?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_term=daily&utm_campaign=20200124&utm_content=Final
Obama Portraits to Tour the Country in 2021
20,632
WASHINGTON, DC - FEBRUARY 12: Former U.S. President Barack Obama and former first lady Michelle Obama stand next to their newly unveiled portraits during a ceremony at the Smithsonian's National Portrait Gallery, on February 12, 2018 in Washington, DC. The portraits were commissioned by the Gallery, for Kehinde Wiley to …Mark Wilson/Getty Images
NATE CHURCH23 Jan 20209713
1:38
Portraits of Barack and Michelle Obama will tour the nation from June 2021 through May 2022 so more people can make the “pilgrimage” to see them.

Artists Kehinde Wiley and Amy Sherald are the first black artists ever included in the National Portrait Gallery’s (NPG) official roster of presidential portraits. Their work has proven extremely popular, to the point of National Portrait Gallery director Kim Sajet characterizing visits to see them as a sort of “pilgrimage.”
In a 2019 article for The Atlantic, Sajet wrote: “Viewing these paintings was turning into a form of secular pilgrimage, and the museum was becoming even more popular as a communal gathering place.” According to an NPG security guard, identified only as “Rhonda” in the piece, one woman even fell to her knees and prayed before the pictures.“No other painting gets the same kind of reactions. Ever,” Sajet said she was told.

“Since the unveiling of these two portraits of the Obamas, the Portrait Gallery has experienced a record number of visitors,” Sajet said in a statement, “not only to view these works in person, but to be part of the communal experience of a particular moment in time.”

Sajet described the tour as “an opportunity for audiences in different parts of the country to witness how portraiture can engage people in the beauty of dialogue and shared experience.” Next year’s tour will begin at the Art Institute of Chicago and wrap up the next year at the Museum of Fine Arts in Houston, Texas.
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 67868
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 75
Location : Wales UK

https://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

OBAMA AGAIN  Empty RJC Presents: "Perilous Times"

Post  Admin on Sat 25 Jan 2020, 6:51 pm

https://israelunwired.com/the-prophetic-video-that-predicted-exactly-what-would-happen-to-israel-if-obama-won/
The Prophetic Video That Predicted Exactly what Would Happen to Israel if Obama Won
By Phil Schneider - January 23, 2020 
Barack Obama claimed that he wanted to be a transformational President. He wanted to leave the world a different place than it was when he assumed the Presidency. He succeeded. The world became a much more dangerous place on his watch and for years afterwards. There were some foreign policy blunders that did not have major ramifications, such as everything that had to do with Russia and the Ukraine. But then there were more serious things like the tragedy in Benghazi when four US citizens were killed due to an ineffective response. But the crown jewel of the horrible foreign policy of the Obama administration was the deal with the Iranians.
 
RJC Presents: "Perilous Times"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=257&v=bsvZLiwkMv8&feature=emb_logo
 
Boost this video to reach up to 1000 people
Obama and Israel. It’s not just the Republican Jewish Association. People have noticed the antagonism of the Obama administration towards Israel since Obama took office in 2009. Obama has become notorious for endangering Israel’s very existence at every opportunity possible. The latest, the Iran Nuclear accord, has devastating consequences for the world and for Israel in particular. Even if Iran chooses not to use the nuclear weapons that it will ultimately build, Israel’s ability to deter terrorist activity will be greatly impaired. It seems that Barack Obama is intent on weakening, even annihilating the Jewish state in a diplomatic “politically correct” manner. Thank God, his plans were largely reversed by the Trump administration. But Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu deserves a lot of credit too. He knew how to give in to Obama, and when to confront him, and in the end, Obama is out of power, Netanyahu is hanging in there, and the Iranian regime is dealing with the effects of crippling economic sanctions on it’s economy.
RJC Presents: "Perilous Times"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=257&v=bsvZLiwkMv8&feature=emb_logo
 
WATCH ALSO.


Do Muslims believe sharia law supersedes the Constitution?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pHQWezK1ccY
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 67868
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 75
Location : Wales UK

https://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

OBAMA AGAIN  Empty Re: OBAMA AGAIN

Post  Admin on Thu 23 Jan 2020, 12:07 am

2020-01-21  •  Hugh Fitzgerald
Obama-backed Free Syrian Army top dog: “Inshallah, we will go wherever there is Jihad” for “the Ottoman Caliphate”
Obama-backed Free Syrian Army top dog: “Inshallah, we will go wherever there is Jihad” for “the Ottoman Caliphate”
“We have a Free Syrian Army and a moderate opposition that we have steadily been working with that we have vetted.” — Barack Obama, September 2014 “Commander in the Turkish-Backed Free Syrian Army: We Will Go to Libya, China, and Wherever There Is Jihad; We Are Willing to Sacrifice Our Lives and Our Children for […]
Read more https://www.jihadwatch.org/2020/01/obama-backed-free-syrian-army-top-dog-inshallah-we-will-go-wherever-there-is-jihad-for-the-ottoman-caliphate?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=the_2020_01_22_jihad_watch_daily_digest&utm_term=2020-01-22

Ahmad Shihabi, a commander in the Turkey-backed Free Syrian Army (FSA) was interviewed on the Turkish Akit TV. In the interview, he was asked whether the FSA would send men to Libya, and answered that they would go “wherever there is Jihad” as soon as the FSA is “finished with the injustice” of Syrian President Bashar Al-Assad. He added that they would go to help their brothers in Turkestan (China). Shihabi said that the FSA is grateful to Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan for “what he has done for the Syrian people, on the humanitarian, military, and political levels”. Shihabi concluded that the FSA fighters are willing to sacrifice their lives, their children, and their elderly for the sake of their country and for the sake of the Ottoman caliphate. The interview was aired on January 17, 2020.

Interviewer: Will the Free Syrian Army send men to Libya?

Ahmad Shihabi: Inshallah, we will go wherever there is Jihad. We won’t stop. As soon as we finish with the injustice of Bashar, we will be among the first to go wherever there is injustice. Inshallah, just like we will crush the injustice of Bashar, we will crush the injustice suffered by our brothers in [East] Turkestan.

[…]

We thank the Turkish government and the great Turkish people. We are grateful to President Recep Erdoğan for what he has done for the Syrian people, on the humanitarian, military, and political levels. We have not been treated as Syrians but as brothers. In the words of President Erdoğan: We are the ansar and you are the muhajireen. We are willing to sacrifice our lives, our children, and our elderly for the sake of our country… for the sake of the Ottoman Caliphate.

Share this:
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 67868
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 75
Location : Wales UK

https://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

OBAMA AGAIN  Empty Re: OBAMA AGAIN

Post  Admin on Wed 22 Jan 2020, 12:53 pm

https://www.breitbart.com/2020-election/2020/01/20/joe-bidens-brother-frank-linked-to-projects-receiving-54000000-in-taxpayer-loans-from-the-obama-administration-despite-no-experience/
Joe Biden’s Brother Frank Linked to Projects Receiving $54,000,000 in Taxpayer Loans from the Obama Administration—Despite No Experience
95,124
The Associated PressAP Photo/Frank Franklin II
HARIS ALIC20 Jan 202015576
5:40
Frank Biden, the youngest brother of former Vice President Joe Biden, saw his business interests benefit from millions of dollars in taxpayer loans to Caribbean nations during the Obama years.

The extensive overlap in Frank Biden’s dealings and Obama-Biden foreign policy in Central America is exposed in Peter Schweizer’s new book—Profiles in Corruption: Abuse of Power by America’s Progressive Elite.

Frank Biden first set his sights on the region in 2009, as the Obama administration began to repair the U.S. relationship with Costa Rica. Tensions between the two countries flared under President George W. Bush, most notably on how to deal with drug trafficking.

When President Barack Obama entered the White House, he set out to mend fences in the region in hopes of inaugurating a new era of global cooperation. Leading the charge on that front was Joe Biden, who had long standing ties to the region from his tenure leading the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

Shortly after the new administration took office, Frank Biden began scouting real estate opportunities in Costa Rica. A lawyer by training, Frank was undeterred by his lack of background in international development and decades old legal troubles at home.

As Schweizer notes, despite the professional and personal handicaps, business opportunities were plentiful for Frank, especially after his brother paid a visit to the country.

“Just months after Vice President [Joe] Biden’s visit, in August, Costa Rica News announced a new multilateral partnership “to reform Real Estate in Latin America” between Frank Biden, a developer named Craig Williamson, and the Guanacaste Country Club, a newly planned resort,” Schweizer writes in his book, a copy of which was exclusively obtained by Breitbart News.

The venture—officially sold to investors and the public as an opportunity to protect Costa Rica’s “breathtaking beauty”—amounted to little more than decimating the country’s natural wilderness to build a luxurious resort for wealthy foreigners.

“In real terms, Frank’s dream was to build in the jungles of Costa Rica thousands of homes, a world-class golf course, casinos, and an anti-aging center,” Schweizer notes. “The Costa Rican government was eager to cooperate with the vice president’s brother.”

The project, which is still in the development phase, has made Frank Biden a well connected figure in Costa Rica’s political landscape. A letter the country’s president, Luis Guillermo Solis Rivera, penned praising the project even made its way on the internet in what appears to have been a botched attempt to solicit further investors.

In order to execute a project of such scale, however, Costa Rica would need to update and expand its electrical grid. Located on the Central American Isthmus, more than 51 percent of the country’s landscape is forested, with nearly half of that being land that has not been disturbed by human activity. As such, much of the area suitable for the type of resort Frank Biden wanted to build lacked access to electricity.
Frank, perhaps sensing a chance to make even more money, entered into a partnership with the Costa Rican National Power and Light Company (CNFL) to build a solar power complex in the country’s northwest region. The new facility would provide enough electricity to Frank’s resort, which was to be built in the vicinity.
The partnership with CNFL was secured even though Frank and his company, Sun Fund Americas, had no experience in the energy sector.

“Frank did not have any background in solar energy, but it was quite clear who he was when he pitched the project to investors,” Schweizer writes. “His brother Joe’s name figured prominently in his biography.”
In October 2016, the Costa Rican government signed a letter of intent with Sun Fund Americas to build a solar power facility in the country. The project, which involved a company called GoSolar, specifically earmarked more than $6.5 million in taxpayer-backed loans that had been approved in 2015 by the Obama administration’s Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC).

Having found Costa Rica fertile ground, Frank next turned his attention to other parts of the Caribbean, like Jamaica. Once again Frank’s business pivot coincided with a new development in brother’s political career.

The Obama administration had announced in June 2014 it was launching the Caribbean Energy Security Initiative (CESI) under the direction of Joe Biden. Officially, the program was meant to support energy sustainability projects in the region, with American tax dollars helping put together deals for local projects.
One of those projects was the building of a 20-megawatt solar power plant in Jamaica, for which OPIC had approved a $47.5 million loan. Around the same time that project was announced, Sun Fund Americas confirmed that signed a power “purchase power purchase agreement to build a 20-megawatt solar facility in Jamaica.”

In total, between 2009 and the end of the Obama administration, Frank Biden’s Caribbean projects benefited from more than $54 million in U.S. taxpayer loans.
The loans, though, are not the only example of Frank Biden’s business interests intersecting with his brother’s political influence, as Profiles in Corruption reveals.
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 67868
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 75
Location : Wales UK

https://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

OBAMA AGAIN  Empty Re: OBAMA AGAIN

Post  Admin on Sat 18 Jan 2020, 9:00 pm

https://israelunwired.com/obama-explains-why-he-sold-out-israel-thank-god-he-wont-be-president-again/
Obama explains why he sold out Israel – Thank God he won’t be president again
By Leah Rosenberg - September 12, 2019 54843 0

Obama says it plain and simple. He was never and never will be a friend of Israel. Obama genuinely believes that Israel has no right to determine for itself where it ultimately sees the Land of Israel borders. Obama supports a state for Arabs west of the Jordan River and therefore pressured Israel to succumb to Arab demands. Not one word from Obama about the nature of the Arab leadership west of the Jordan river. Not one word about the strategic threats that this would pose towards the safety of millions of Jews who would live within missile range of a future Arab state.

Arms Support for the State of Israel
The United States has NOT always supported the State of Israel with arms. It began after the Six Day War – not before. For the first 19+ years, the State of Israel procured arms via the French, via the Czechs, and nearly anyone they could buy World War II surplus arms from.

But following the Six Day War, the United States agreed for it’s own national interests to invest in supplying weapons to Israel AND to it’s Arab neighbors in order to have more leverage and control with what happens in the Middle East. Of course, this is also beneficial to weapons manufacturers in the United States. When the State of Israel began to manufacture it’s own aircraft, the Lavi, it was American businessmen, Congressmen, and Senators who bullied Israel into backing down on their own weapons production. The United States supports Israel because it is in their interest. Obama knew that he could not defeat Congress on the arms package issue. So, he allowed that to go through, but radically softened the United States stance against Iran instead. So, he weakened Israel by strengthening their enemies instead.
He was no friend and should always be remembered as a hostile President to the best friend and ally of the United States.
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 67868
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 75
Location : Wales UK

https://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

OBAMA AGAIN  Empty Re: OBAMA AGAIN

Post  Admin on Fri 17 Jan 2020, 4:22 pm

https://gellerreport.com/2020/01/the-gao-ruled-obama-broke-the-law-in-2014-but-no-one-called-for-his-impeachment.html/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=facebook
The GAO Ruled Obama Broke The Law in 2014, But No One Called for His Impeachment
By Pamela Geller - on January 16, 2020
OBAMA'S 2ND TERM

76 Times Obama’s White House illegally and unethically abused its power as documented by Ted Cruz:
No commentary needed, just going to get out of Cruz’ way:

1. Disregarded 1996 welfare reform law in granting broad work waivers for work requirements of Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF).

2. Implemented portions of the DREAM Act, which Congress rejected, by executive action.


3. Ended some terror asylum restrictions, by allowing asylum for people who provided only “insignificant” or “limited” material support of terrorists.

4. Allowed immigrants in the U.S. illegally, who are relatives of military troops and veterans, to stay in the country and get legal status.

5. Extended federal marriage benefits by recognizing, under federal law, same-sex marriages created in a state that allows same-sex marriage even if the couple is living in a state that doesn’t recognize same-sex marriage.


6. Recognized same-sex marriage in Utah, even though the Supreme Court stayed the court order recognizing same-sex marriage in Utah and Utah said it would not recognize same-sex marriages performed before the stay.

7. Refused to prosecute violation of drug laws with certain mandatory minimums.

8. Issued signing statements, refusing to enforce parts of congressional-enacted statutes.


9. Illegally refused to act on Yucca Mountain’s application to become a nuclear waste repository.

10. Falsely portrayed the Benghazi terrorist attack as a spontaneous protest against an anti-Muslim YouTube video, and then lied about the White House’s involvement.

11 Illegally revealed the existence of sealed indictments in the Benghazi investigation.

12. Failed to enforce the Magnitsky Act as required by law, by not adding Russian human rights abusers to a list of people not permitted to travel to or do business in the U.S.

13. Killed four Americans overseas in counterterrorism operations without judicial process.

14. Continued to give Egypt aid after the military took over its government, even though federal law prohibits aid to Egypt in the event of a coup.


15. Granted a “hardship” exemption from the individual mandate for people whose health plans were canceled because their plans weren’t Obamacare compliant.

16. Delayed the individual mandate for two years.

17. Allowed individuals to buy health insurance plans in 2014 that did not comply with Obamacare. Extended this delay until 2016—past the mid-term elections.

18. Extended the deadline to enroll in Obamacare.

19. Illegally granted businesses a waiver from Obamacare’s employer mandate. Twice.

20. Illegally continued the Obamacare employer contribution for congressional staffs.


21. Illegally delayed the Obamacare caps on out-of-pocket healthcare payments.

22. Illegally delayed Obamacare verification of eligibility for healthcare subsidies.

23. Illegally required people to violate their faith via the Obamacare contraception mandate.

24. As of May 2011, over 50% of Obamacare waiver beneficiaries were union members (who account for less than 12% of the American work force).

25. Ordered Boeing to fire 1,000 employees in South Carolina and shut down a new factory because it was non-union.

26. Implemented a moratorium on offshore drilling after the Deepwater Horizon oil spill without statutory authority, and continued to enact new versions after federal courts repeatedly invalidated the moratorium.


27. Treated secured creditors worse than unsecured creditors in the Chrysler bankruptcy.

28. Terminated the pensions of 20,000 non-union Delphi employees in the GM bankruptcy.

29. Had SWAT teams raid a Gibson guitar factory and seize property, on the purported basis that Gibson had broken India’s environmental laws—but no charges were filed.

30. Government agencies are engaging in “Operation Choke Point,” where the government asks banks to “choke off” access to financial services for customers engaging in conduct the Administration does not like—such as “ammunition sales.”

31. Made illegal “recess” appointments to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and the National Labor Relations Board when Congress wasn’t in recess. Ignored the rulings of three federal courts of appeals that held those nominations unconstitutional. 2.

32. Appointed czars to oversee federal policy specifically because czars do not require Senate confirmation, earning criticism from stalwart Democrats such as West Virginia Sen. Robert Byrd and Wisconsin Sen. Russ Feingold.

33. As of January 2012, 36 of the President’s executive office staff owed $833,970 in back taxes.

34. As of 2011, 311,566 federal employees or retirees owed $3.5 billion in taxes.

35. Illegally targeted conservative groups for heightened IRS scrutiny.

36. Circumvented the Freedom of Information Act, by requiring White House Counsel review of all documents to be released under the Freedom of Information Act that the Administration believed pertained to “White House equities”—and then delayed in producing many of these documents by FOIA’s statutory deadline, or didn’t produce them at all.

37. Got secret permission from the FISA Court to reverse restrictions on the National Security Agency’s use of intercepted phone calls and emails, permitting the NSA to search American’s communications in its databases.

38. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is seeking to monitor about 80% of U.S. credit card transactions.


39. Targeted Fox News reporter James Rosen by falsely labeling him a possible “co-conspirator” in a criminal investigation of a new leak.

40. Secretly obtained phone records from staff at the Associated Press.

41. Had meetings with lobbyists in coffee shops near White House to avoid disclosure requirements.

42. Aided drug cartels instead of enforcing immigration laws—as found by a federal judge. Border Patrol agents, multiple times, knowingly helped smuggle illegal immigrant children into the U.S.; “the DHS is encouraging parents to seriously jeopardize the safety of their children.”

43. Illegally sold thousands of guns to criminals, in the operation known as Fast and Furious and then refused to comply with congressional subpoenas about the operation.

44. Dismissed charges filed by Bush Administration against New Black Panther Party members who were videotaped intimidating voters at a Philadelphia polling station during the 2008 election.


45. Argued for expansive federal powers in the Supreme Court, which has rejected the Administration’s arguments unanimously 9 times since January 2012.

46. Sued Louisiana to stop school vouchers and keep low-income minorities trapped in failing schools.

47. Threatened to arrest military priests for practicing their faith during the partial government shutdown.

48. Muzzled the speech of military chaplains.

49. Sued fire departments saying their multiple-choice, open-book written employment tests were racially discriminatory.

50. Gave 23,994 tax refunds worth more than $46 million to aliens here illegally using the same address in Atlanta, GA.

51. Released a mentally ill Guantanamo detainee… who had been a high-risk al Qaeda fighter in jihad combat since the 1980s.

52. Backed release of the Lockerbie bomber, Abdel Baset al-Megrahi.

53. President Obama told NASA administrator to “find a way to reach out to the Muslim world.”

54. Claimed the Fort Hood shooting was “workplace violence” rather than terrorism.

55. Signed a stimulus bill that spent money on bonuses for AIG executives, and then acted shocked and outraged at the bonuses.

56. Gave $535 million to Solyndra, which went bankrupt; Solyndra shareholders and officials made substantial donations to Obama’s campaign.

57. Reneged on a campaign promise to cut the deficit in half by the end of his first term in office.

58. Increased the national debt more in one term than President Bush did in two terms.

59. Extended mortgage assistance to people who bought multiple homes during the housing bubble.

60. Proposed rules that would have decimated family farms, by prohibiting children under 18 from doing many forms of farm work.

61. Former “safe schools czar” has written about his past drug abuse and advocated promoting homosexuality in schools.

62. Nominated Timothy Geithner—who had significant tax issues —to head the Treasury Department, which enforces tax laws.

63. Reneged on campaign promise to broadcast healthcare reform negotiations on C-SPAN.

64. Reneged on a campaign promise to wait five days before signing any non-emergency bill (at least 10 times during first 3 months in office).

65. Unilaterally, increased the minimum wage for federal contract workers from $7.25 to $10.10, via executive order.

66. Cancelled all White House tours after sequestration—purportedly saving $18,000 per week—even though President Obama had spent more than $1 million in tax money to golf with Tiger Woods one weekend a few weeks before.

67. Adopted pro-union “ambush election” rules.

68. Pressured Ford to pull an anti-auto-bailout TV ad.

69. Actively, aided in George Zimmerman protests.

70. Tried to seize a privately owned motel when guests used illegal drugs at the motel.

71. Shut down the Amber Alert website, while keeping up Let’s Move website, during the partial government shutdown.

72. Gave supervised release to a convicted criminal (an alien here illegally) who later killed a nun in a DUI.

73. Shut down an Amish farm for selling fresh unpasteurized milk across state lines.

74. Spent $7 million per household in “stimulus funds” to connect a few Montana households to the Internet.


75. Spent $205,075 in “stimulus” funds to relocate a shrub that sells for $16.

76. Fired an inspector general after investigating an $850,000 AmeriCorps grant received by a nonprofit run by former NBA star and Obama supporter Kevin Johnson (now mayor of Sacramento).

THE GAO RULED OBAMA BROKE THE LAW IN 2014, BUT NO ONE CALLED FOR HIS IMPEACHMENT
By Matt Margolis PJM, January 16, 2020:

Former President Barack Obama speaks at the University of Illinois campus in Urbana, Ill., on Friday, Sept. 7, 2018. (Stephen Haas//The News-Gazette via AP)
On Thursday, The Government Accountability Office (GAO) issued a legal opinion concluding that by withholding aid to Ukraine the Trump administration broke the law because Congress had appropriated those funds and the executive branch, therefore, did not have the right to place any conditions on that aid being delivered.

Now, let’s forget the fact that Ukrainian officials were unaware there was ever any hold on the aid, or that said aid was actually delivered. The Washington Post claims that the foundation of the GOP’s argument against impeachment was “severely undermined” by the GAO ruling, and the left is foaming at the mouth on social media claiming this proves that Trump committed an impeachable offense and the ruling has justified impeachment.

Except, if a GAO legal opinion justifies impeachment, Obama should have been impeached.

That’s right, back in 2014, the GAO ruled that Obama’s prisoner swap of five detainees at Guantanamo Bay prison in exchange for deserter Bowe Bergdahl violated federal law. “The Department of Defense violated section 8111 of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2014 when it transferred five individuals detained at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to the nation of Qatar without providing at least 30-days notice to certain congressional committees,” the GAO explained.

The department also violated another law that prohibits federal employees from spending money not authorized by Congress. “DOD should report its Antideficiency Act violation as required by law,” the GAO said.

At the time of the swap, President Barack Obama defended the move, saying the U.S. has a “sacred rule” not to leave men and women in uniform behind.

“We saw an opportunity,” Mr. Obama said on June 3. “We were concerned about Sgt. Bergdahl’s health. We had the cooperation of the Qataris to execute an exchange, and we seized that opportunity.”

But lawmakers from both sides of the aisle questioned the decision, saying the administration disregarded the 30-day notice provision of the law.

“In this case, the duty to inform Congress could have been easily satisfied and it was not even necessary to violate the law in order to carry out the exchange,” wrote George Washington Law Professor Jonathan Turley at the time the ruling was made. “It seems more likely that this was done for political purposes to avoid opposition in Congress.”


There were no calls for Obama’s impeachment even though he’d broken the law.

But, while we’re talking about GAO rulings, I might as well point out that the GAO also found that Obama had broken the law for failing “to follow its own health reform law in a $5 billion dispute over compensating insurers for high costs from seriously ill patients.” That’s right, Obama did just break the law, he was violating his own law, Obamacare.

So, while the current headlines feel like a gotcha moment for left, the only way it would is if Obama had impeached when the GAO ruled he’d broken the law.

So… impeach Obama? After all, we don’t want there to be a double standard, now do we?

THE TRUTH MUST BE TOLD
Your contribution supports independent journalism
Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 67868
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 75
Location : Wales UK

https://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

OBAMA AGAIN  Empty Re: OBAMA AGAIN

Post  Admin on Mon 13 Jan 2020, 1:28 pm

https://israelunwired.com/how-white-leftists-are-fueling-the-racism-machine/
How White Leftists are Fueling the Racism Machine
By Phil Schneider - January 13, 2020 514 0
To be called a racist is one of the lowest forms of denunciation today, creating divide and shutting down people’s voices. Nobody wants to be called a racist.

This short clip denounces white liberals as part of the problem of what is fueling racism today. Perhaps what is needed is less name-calling, from both sides, less polarization, and more discussion of what we have in common. Perhaps there needs to be more discussion about sidelining the radicals and focusing more on the things that 70-80% of the people agree on. Instead, right-wingers and left-wingers are busy pulling each side more to the right and more to the left. This is a troubling phenomenon.

https://israelunwired.com/how-white-leftists-are-fueling-the-racism-machine/
Boost this video to reach up to 1000 people
Is Donald Trump the cause of polarization?
Well, certainly, the last 2 Presidents of the United States have been polarizing figures. They each – in their own unique way – have not tried to just warm the seat in the Oval office. Former President Barack Obama stated clearly that he wanted to be a transformational President. And President Trump is very loose with his speech that is interpreted as polarizing.

The price of the one-two Obama and Trump presidencies has been a rather deep polarization within American society. It seems that America needs the next President – in 2020 or 2024, no matter what party, to be a more unifying President. The American people need a break from the right-wing bashing and progressive-bashing. They need leaders who will speak in terms of uplifting the silent majority that is not interested in bashing anybody and not interested in clearly taking any side on any issues.

Donald Trump and Barack Obama, and many other politicians dominate the airwaves too much. What is needed is an entertaining, non-controversial spokesman who will transcend much of the conversations that we are used to. This can be transcending on a religious level or transcending in other ways. The original founding fathers were interested in a United States that was focused on financial opportunities and freedom and not on hot button issues like racism and illegal immigration. Of course, racism and illegal immigration are controversial issues that must be dealt with, but they should not dominate. We need to get back to the basics and build up the level of respect between one for the benefit of the USA and the whole freedom-loving world.
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 67868
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 75
Location : Wales UK

https://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

OBAMA AGAIN  Empty Re: OBAMA AGAIN

Post  Admin on Mon 06 Jan 2020, 9:20 pm

Obama stopped Israel from killing Soleimani in 2015, threatened to shoot down IAF strike on Iran
By Robert Spencer on Jan 05, 2020 01:00 pm
Obama stopped Israel from killing Soleimani in 2015, threatened to shoot down IAF strike on Iran
Just whose side was this man on? Yes, of course, he was just trying to avoid a costly war with Iran. That’s why he gave the mullahs billions that they used to finance jihad terrorist groups. “Report: Obama Administration Stopped Israel From Assassinating Soleimani in 2015,” by Tyler O’Neil, PJ Media, January 3, 2020: When […]
Read in browser »
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2020/01/obama-stopped-israel-from-killing-soleimani-in-2015-threatened-to-shoot-down-iaf-strike-on-iran

https://www.jihadwatch.org/2020/01/obama-stopped-israel-from-killing-soleimani-in-2015-threatened-to-shoot-down-iaf-strike-on-iran
Obama stopped Israel from killing Soleimani in 2015, threatened to shoot down IAF strike on Iran
JAN 5, 2020 1:00 PM BY ROBERT SPENCER38 COMMENTS
Just whose side was this man on? Yes, of course, he was just trying to avoid a costly war with Iran. That’s why he gave the mullahs billions that they used to finance jihad terrorist groups.

“Report: Obama Administration Stopped Israel From Assassinating Soleimani in 2015,” by Tyler O’Neil, PJ Media, January 3, 2020:

When President Donald Trump gave the order to kill Iran’s Quds Force leader Qasem Soleimani, he not only made an arguably proportionate response to the invasion of the U.S. Embassy this week but he also reversed a policy of the Obama administration. According to a report from 2018, Israel was “on the verge” of assassinating Soleimani in 2015, but Obama’s officials foiled the plan. In fact, they reached out to Iran with news of Israel’s plans.

The Trump administration, on the other hand, gave Israel a green light to assassinate Soleimani, according to a January 1, 2018 report from the Kuwaiti newspaper Al-Jarida. The paper quoted a source in Jerusalem as saying that “there is an American-Israeli agreement” that Soleimani is a “threat to the two countries’ interests in the region.” According to Haaretz, Al-Jarida is generally assumed to be a platform for the Israeli government to disseminate its message to other Middle Eastern governments.

According to the report, the agreement between Israel and the U.S. came three years after Washington thwarted an Israeli attempt to kill the Iranian general.

“The report says Israel was ‘on the verge’ of assassinating Soleimani three years ago, near Damascus, but the United States warned the Iranian leadership of the plan, revealing that Israel was closely tracking the Iranian general,” Haaretz reported.

The incident “sparked a sharp disagreement between the Israeli and American security and intelligence apparatuses regarding the issue.” That sounds like an understatement.

President Barack Obama frequently snubbed Israel, considered by many to be America’s best ally in the Middle East. Yet the news that the Obama’s administration prevented Israel from assassinating the Quds Force leader seems particularly significant, since the Obama administration also kept a list of approximately 500 American soldiers who were murdered by Iranian IEDs. Since the Quds Force spearheads Iran’s operations outside the Islamic Republic, Soleimani would arguably be responsible for all of those deaths.

When Trump finally gave the order to kill the Quds Force leader, it came after multiple attacks against Americans and American facilities in Iraq — attacks that arguably traced back to Soleimani himself….

There is much more. Read the rest here.

We had this news back in 2015. “‘Obama Threatened to Shoot Down IAF Iran Strike,'” by Mark Langfan, Israel National News, January 3, 2015:

The Bethlehem-based news agency Ma’an has cited a Kuwaiti newspaper report Saturday, that US President Barack Obama thwarted an Israeli military attack against Iran’s nuclear facilities in 2014 by threatening to shoot down Israeli jets before they could reach their targets in Iran.

Following Obama’s threat, Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu was reportedly forced to abort the planned Iran attack.

According to Al-Jarida, the Netanyahu government took the decision to strike Iran some time in 2014 soon after Israel had discovered the United States and Iran had been involved in secret talks over Iran’s nuclear program and were about to sign an agreement in that regard behind Israel’s back.

The report claimed that an unnamed Israeli minister who has good ties with the US administration revealed the attack plan to Secretary of State John Kerry, and that Obama then threatened to shoot down the Israeli jets before they could reach their targets in Iran.

Al-Jarida quoted “well-placed” sources as saying that Netanyahu, along with Minister of Defense Moshe Yaalon, and then-Foreign Minister Avigdor Liberman, had decided to carry out airstrikes against Iran’s nuclear program after consultations with top security commanders.

According to the report, “Netanyahu and his commanders agreed after four nights of deliberations to task the Israeli army’s chief of staff, Benny Gantz, to prepare a qualitative operation against Iran’s nuclear program. In addition, Netanyahu and his ministers decided to do whatever they could do to thwart a possible agreement between Iran and the White House because such an agreement is, allegedly, a threat to Israel’s security.”

The sources added that Gantz and his commanders prepared the requested plan and that Israeli fighter jets trained for several weeks in order to make sure the plans would work successfully. Israeli fighter jets reportedly even carried out experimental flights in Iran’s airspace after they managed to break through radars.

Brzezinski’s idea

Former US diplomat Zbigniew Brzezinski, who enthusiastically campaigned for Obama in 2008, called on him to shoot down Israeli planes if they attack Iran. “They have to fly over our airspace in Iraq. Are we just going to sit there and watch?” said the former national security advisor to former President Jimmy Carter in an interview with the Daily Beast.

“We have to be serious about denying them that right,” he said. “If they fly over, you go up and confront them. They have the choice of turning back or not. No one wishes for this but it could be a ‘Liberty’ in reverse.’”…
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 67868
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 75
Location : Wales UK

https://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

OBAMA AGAIN  Empty Re: OBAMA AGAIN

Post  Admin on Tue 31 Dec 2019, 1:05 am

https://www.dailyconservative.com/sc2/trump-ties-obama-title.htm
Trump ties with Obama for title of America’s most admired man
December 30, 2019
Loading...
Former President Barack Obama just got the devastating news that he now has to share his long-held title of “most admired man in America” with President Donald Trump. 

According to Gallup’s yearly survey, Donald Trump and Barack Obama are tied this year, with each garnering 18 percent of the vote.

This comes as an especially shocking blow because Obama has exclusively held the title for 12 years in a row.

Gallup explains, “Each year since 1948, Gallup has asked Americans to name, in an open-ended fashion, which man and woman living anywhere in the world they admire most. This year’s results are based on a Dec. 2-15 poll.”

The poll noted that the results are “sharply divided along party lines,” with 41 percent of Democrats choosing Obama, and 45 percent of Republicans touting Trump as their most admired figure.

Trump’s rating boasts a 5 percent increase from the 2018 poll — an interesting developing considering how much more intense the attacks against Trump have been in 2019 than the last two years.

Additionally, Gallup goes on to say that Trump is more popular overall than he has been in past years, and his job approval rating has jumped to 45% this year.
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 67868
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 75
Location : Wales UK

https://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

OBAMA AGAIN  Empty Re: OBAMA AGAIN

Post  Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 1 of 3 1, 2, 3  Next

Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum