World Wide Christians Partner with Jesus' Place/
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Who is online?
In total there are 9 users online :: 1 Registered, 0 Hidden and 8 Guests :: 2 Bots

Admin

[ View the whole list ]


Most users ever online was 115 on Wed 03 Jul 2019, 3:20 pm
Latest topics
» Bayo Afolaranmi (Pastor).
CORONAVIRUS  (COVID-19)  EmptyToday at 10:28 pm by Admin

» AISH
CORONAVIRUS  (COVID-19)  EmptyToday at 10:15 pm by Admin

» Keith China Nanjing
CORONAVIRUS  (COVID-19)  EmptyToday at 9:36 pm by Admin

» KEITH NOTES FROM NANJING
CORONAVIRUS  (COVID-19)  EmptyToday at 9:32 pm by Admin

» Daily Disciples
CORONAVIRUS  (COVID-19)  EmptyToday at 8:01 pm by Admin

» ISRAEL VIDEO'S VARIOUS COVERAGES
CORONAVIRUS  (COVID-19)  EmptyToday at 7:55 pm by Admin

» servant @ TWO LISTENERS
CORONAVIRUS  (COVID-19)  EmptyToday at 7:44 pm by Admin

» R.D SOUZA Saved by faith
CORONAVIRUS  (COVID-19)  EmptyToday at 7:41 pm by Admin

»  Chip Brogden CHURCH WITHOUT WALLS
CORONAVIRUS  (COVID-19)  EmptyToday at 7:39 pm by Admin

» Black Lives Matter Riots and MORE
CORONAVIRUS  (COVID-19)  EmptyToday at 7:17 pm by Admin

» BIBLE STUDY on VERSE
CORONAVIRUS  (COVID-19)  EmptyToday at 12:00 am by Admin

» FRANCIS FRANGIPANE MINISTRIES
CORONAVIRUS  (COVID-19)  EmptyYesterday at 9:56 pm by Admin

» NUGGET Today's Devotional
CORONAVIRUS  (COVID-19)  EmptyYesterday at 9:29 pm by Admin

» What Do We Know about Angels in the Bible?
CORONAVIRUS  (COVID-19)  EmptyYesterday at 9:13 pm by Admin

» R.D SOUZA Saved by faith
CORONAVIRUS  (COVID-19)  EmptyFri 25 Sep 2020, 10:35 pm by Admin

» WORTHY NEWS
CORONAVIRUS  (COVID-19)  EmptyFri 25 Sep 2020, 10:12 pm by Admin

» The Cleansing Blood Old Testament and New
CORONAVIRUS  (COVID-19)  EmptyFri 25 Sep 2020, 9:47 pm by Admin

» +Dev+ Michael D. Inman Pastor
CORONAVIRUS  (COVID-19)  EmptyThu 24 Sep 2020, 10:31 pm by Admin

»  HONEST REPORTING Defending Israel from Media Bias plz read REGULAR UPDATES
CORONAVIRUS  (COVID-19)  EmptyThu 24 Sep 2020, 10:28 pm by Admin

»  HOLOCAUST STUDIES
CORONAVIRUS  (COVID-19)  EmptyThu 24 Sep 2020, 10:25 pm by Admin

Navigation
 Portal
 Index
 Memberlist
 Profile
 FAQ
 Search

CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19)

Page 1 of 3 1, 2, 3  Next

Go down

CORONAVIRUS  (COVID-19)  Empty Re: CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19)

Post  Admin on Wed 16 Sep 2020, 9:52 pm

COVID-19
Get the latest information from the NHS about coronavirus.
 See more resources on Google 

#FoxNews #Tucker
Coronavirus whistleblower speaks out about possible COVID origin on 'Tucker'


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qFlqXPl_hZQ&fbclid=IwAR0DRcBDgVP0hT_vF7XmU3DI1rn6SAj_cMW0SkmnLZ3pkDFPOzS4JR_wC1U


Dr. Li-Meng Yan joins Tucker Carlson with insight on 'Tucker Carlson Tonight.' #FoxNews #Tucker


Subscribe to Fox News! bit.ly 2vBUvAS
Watch more Fox News Video: http://video.foxnews.com
Watch Fox News Channel Live: http://www.foxnewsgo.com/

FOX News Channel (FNC) is a 24-hour all-encompassing news service delivering breaking news as well as political and business news. The number one network in cable, FNC has been the most-watched television news channel for 18 consecutive years. According to a 2020 Brand Keys Consumer Loyalty Engagement Index report, FOX News is the top brand in the country for morning and evening news coverage. A 2019 Suffolk University poll named FOX News as the most trusted source for television news or commentary, while a 2019 Brand Keys Emotion Engagement Analysis survey found that FOX News was the most trusted cable news brand. A 2017 Gallup/Knight Foundation survey also found that among Americans who could name an objective news source, FOX News was the top-cited outlet. Owned by FOX Corporation, FNC is available in nearly 90 million homes and dominates the cable news landscape, routinely notching the top ten programs in the genre.
 
Watch full episodes of your favorite shows
The Five: http://video.foxnews.com/playlist/lon...
Special Report with Bret Baier: http://video.foxnews.com/playlist/lon...
The Story with Martha Maccallum: http://video.foxnews.com/playlist/lon...
Tucker Carlson Tonight: http://video.foxnews.com/playlist/lon...
Hannity:  http://video.foxnews.com/playlist/lon...
The Ingraham Angle: http://video.foxnews.com/playlist/lon...
Fox News @ Night: http://video.foxnews.com/playlist/lon...
 
Follow Fox News on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/FoxNews/
Follow Fox News on Twitter: https://twitter.com/FoxNews/
Follow Fox News on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/foxnews/om/
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 66349
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 75
Location : Wales UK

https://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

CORONAVIRUS  (COVID-19)  Empty Re: CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19)

Post  Admin on Tue 01 Sep 2020, 3:55 pm

The whole scam just fell apart: COVID test, overwhelming number of false positives Sep
1
by Jon Rappoport

September 1, 2020

(To join our email list, click here.)

Townhall.com, August 29: “According to The New York Times, potentially 90 percent of those who have tested positive for COVID-19 have such insignificant amounts of the virus present in their bodies that such individuals do not need to isolate nor are they candidates for contact tracing. Leading public health experts are now concerned that overtesting is responsible for misdiagnosing a huge number of people with harmless amounts of the virus in their systems.”

“’Most of these people are not likely to be contagious…’ warns The Times.”

Yes, that’s what the NY Times is confessing (8/29): “Some of the nation’s leading public health experts are raising a new concern in the endless debate over coronavirus testing in the United States: The standard tests are diagnosing huge numbers of people who may be carrying relatively insignificant amounts of the virus. Most of these people are not likely to be contagious…”

“In three sets of testing data…compiled by officials in Massachusetts, New York and Nevada, up to 90 percent of people testing positive carried barely any virus, a review by The Times found.”

Let me break this down for you, because it’s a lot worse than the Times admits. The rabbit hole goes much deeper—and I’ve been reporting on the deeper facts for months.

The issue appears to be the ballooning sensitivity of the PCR test. It’s so sensitive that it picks up inconsequential tiny, tiny amounts of virus that couldn’t harm a flea—and it calls these amounts “positive.”

Therefore, millions of people are labeled “positive/infected” who carry so little virus that no harm would come to them or anyone they come in contact with.

That would be bad enough. But the truth is, the PCR test is not able to produce ANY reliable number that reflects how much virus a person is carrying. A lot, a little, it doesn’t matter.

The test has never been validated, in a large-scale study, for the ability to quantify the amount of virus a person is carrying. I’ve proposed how that study should be done IN THE REAL WORLD, NOT IN THE LAB.

You take 1000 people and remove tissue samples from them. A lab puts these samples through its PCR and announces which virus it found in each case and how much virus it found in each case.

It says: “All right, in patients 23, 46, 76, 89, 265 we found a high amount of virus.”

That should mean these particular patients are visibly sick. They will have obvious clinical symptoms. Why? Because actual illness requires millions of millions of a virus replicating in the body.

So now we unblind these particular patients with high amounts of virus, according to the PCR. Are they, in fact, sick? Or are they running marathons and swimming five miles a day? Let’s see. For real.

THIS VALIDATION OF THE PCR HAS NEVER BEEN DONE.

Therefore, the claim that the PCR can determine how much virus is in a human is completely and utterly unproven. Period.

Therefore, ALL the PCR tests being done on people all over the world reflect NOTHING about illness, infection, contagion, or transmission.

The scam is wall to wall.

But there’s more.

The PCR isn’t even testing for a particular virus in the first place. It’s using a piece of RNA assumed to be part of a virus. The assumption is unproven.

And finally, as I’ve been writing and demonstrating for months, there is no evidence that researchers used proper procedure to discover “a new coronavirus that is causing a pandemic.”

Therefore, the PCR test, as worthless as it already is, aims to show the presence of a germ that has never been shown to exist.

But let’s lock down the planet, destroy economies and untold numbers of lives in the process.

SOURCES:

townhall.com/tipsheet/bronsonstocking/2020/08/29/it-looks-like-a-lot-of-those-positive-covid-tests-should-have-been-negative-n2575305

nytimes.com/2020/08/29/health/coronavirus-testing.html

The Matrix Revealed

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.) http://marketplace.mybigcommerce.com/the-matrix-revealed/
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 66349
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 75
Location : Wales UK

https://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

CORONAVIRUS  (COVID-19)  Empty Re: CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19)

Post  Admin on Tue 25 Aug 2020, 12:49 pm

WELL, WELL, WELL!! Isn’t it just an interesting coincidence that Remdesivir is made by Gilead and is the “CURE” for COVID-19....and here’s where it gets interesting: China holds the patent on the drug through an agreement with Gilead’s drug patent sharing subsidiary branch called UNITAID, who has an office near Wuhan, and you’ll never guess who are the main financial investors in UNITAID....none other than George Soros, Bill & Melinda Gates, and WHO. I know what you’re thinking! It’s just all a coincidence isn’t it! Oh, don’t let me forget the other coincidence, that Gilead and UNITAID were financial supporters of Hillary Clinton. Oh, silly me, I forgot one more coincidence, Fauci was the one authorizing millions to be sent to The Wuhan Institute of Virology specifically for the “study” of Coronaviruses......I sure am thankful it’s all just coincidences! Nothing to see here, just keep moving along....WOW! No wonder Fauci slapped down hydroxychloroquine which has a 92% success rate...he was told to!! Fauci's wife also works for Gilead.
The Best Coincidences are always found when you follow the money..! ! !
I don’t know... does it make you ask questions? Do your own research... could all just be coincidence?!?!
Here is a link to substantiate this….
https://civilianintelligencenetwork.ca/2020/02/12/george-soros-bill-gates-partner-with-china-on-coronavirus-drug/?fbclid=IwAR0WYuZ_kq8ZC9Z9CTIE2ag9UIhaDTdi2dqOgB1kHYxaXRJpVJE3DcD7Zfg
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 66349
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 75
Location : Wales UK

https://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

CORONAVIRUS  (COVID-19)  Empty Re: CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19)

Post  Admin on Sun 23 Aug 2020, 11:03 pm

Videos and photographs of a massive pool party in Wuhan irked news outlets and social media users, but China claims the critics are just bitter about their own nations’ poor handling of the Covid-19 pandemic.
The images from Wuhan, where the virus is believed to have originated, showed partygoers forgoing masks and social distancing guidelines that are still in place in many countries. Footage of the festivities, posted by AFP, quickly went viral, with the news outlet noting that residents had packed the water park as “the city edges back to normal life.” The city was put under strict lockdown, lasting 76 days, when the outbreak began in January. Many said the boisterous scenes from Wuhan gave them hope, arguing that the city had endured harsh restrictions and now appeared to be nearly coronavirus-free. 
https://www.rt.com/news/498525-wuhan-pool-party-sour-grapes-coronavirus/
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 66349
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 75
Location : Wales UK

https://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

CORONAVIRUS  (COVID-19)  Empty Re: CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19)

Post  Admin on Tue 04 Aug 2020, 7:31 pm

https://www.rt.com/news/496801-pharma-not-accountable-vaccine-effect/?fbclid=IwAR1yHsEfjhXixAzrwmVn7oJp86ZM0dSvSMFnBSl7iR1ZiRaLIQWzQ1xNVjs
Bubble indemnity: Big Pharma firms will NOT be held accountable for side effects of Covid vaccine
31 Jul, 2020 17:48 / Updated 3 days ago
Get short URL
Bubble indemnity: Big Pharma firms will NOT be held accountable for side effects of Covid vaccine
By Peter Andrews, Irish science journalist and writer based in London. He has a background in the life sciences, and graduated from the University of Glasgow with a degree in genetics.


A senior executive for pharmaceutical giant AstraZeneca has confirmed that his company cannot face legal action for any potential side effects caused by its Covid vaccine. Those affected will have no legal recourse.
AstraZeneca is one of 25 pharmaceutical companies worldwide already testing their Covid vaccines on humans, in preparation for injecting hundreds of millions of people. These are flush times for Britain’s largest pharmaceutical company, worth something in the order of £70 million. They have just reported bumper profits of $12.6 billion in the last six months alone.


But despite its healthy balance sheet, AstraZeneca is unwilling to be held responsible for any potential side effects of its ‘hopeful’ vaccine candidate. In other words, the company is completely protected, or indemnified, against lawsuits from people who are injected with their vaccine and experience negative effects, regardless of how severe or long-lasting they are.


The firm’s lawyers have demanded that clauses to that effect be put in their contracts with the countries AstraZeneca has agreed to supply with its Covid vaccine. The company says that, without such guarantees of indemnity, they would not be incentivised to produce the drug. And it seems most of the countries have ceded to this demand.


Done in the national interest?
Ruud Dobber, a senior AstraZeneca executive, told Reuters “In the contracts we have in place, we are asking for indemnification. For most countries it is acceptable to take that risk on their shoulders because it is in their national interest’’. For “national interest,” read “government interest.” Whether what is happening is good for the actual people of vaccinated countries is, to put it very mildly, an open question.
Dobber refused to name the countries which have placed orders for the firm’s vaccine, although many major western democracies are likely to be on the list. The UK government has been on a vaccine spending spree, buying 250 million doses from various Big Pharma outfits. America, meanwhile, is way ahead of the curve here – they have a special legal framework in which no pharmaceutical companies face lawsuits for side effects of vaccines in case of ‘public health emergencies’. This legislation, known as the PREP Act, was the product of a massive lobbying effort from the US pharmaceutical industry, and was introduced despite vigorous opposition from consumer groups. Unless the vaccine maker intentionally murders or injures you – willful misconduct – you cannot sue them.


As senior EU officials told Reuters this week, they are locking horns with the vaccine manufacturers over price, payment timelines and, above all, liability. That no one wants to be stuck with liability is hardly surprising. Pump a population full of an experimental vaccine to ‘immunise’ them against a disease that is harmless to most people, and then be held accountable for the consequences? I don’t think so. Big Pharma executives do not earn the seven-figure salaries they do for falling into traps like that.


Dobber also added: “This is a unique situation where we as a company simply cannot take the risk if in ... four years the vaccine is showing side effects.” Oh… okay then. So who does take on the responsibility then? The WHO? Pull the other one. Politicians? Don’t make me laugh. No one? Gotcha.


Who pays?
Because there is a virtual guarantee that in a major vaccination programme some people will be harmed or even killed by the vaccine, some countries have set up special public funds to pay compensation to those affected. The WHO supports this model of taxpayer-funded damages for vaccine claimants.


ALSO ON RT.COM
Feline unwell: Pet cat becomes FIRST UK animal to test positive for Covid-19
The US has such a fund, as do many European countries including the UK, Germany, Sweden and Italy. It might be worth looking up the relevant system in your own country if you are worried about taking the vaccine. One thing is certain though: when it comes to Covid-19, private capital have decided that they want nothing to do with the long-term consequences of their vaccinations.


Like this story? Share it with a friend!
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 66349
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 75
Location : Wales UK

https://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

CORONAVIRUS  (COVID-19)  Empty Re: CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19)

Post  Admin on Mon 03 Aug 2020, 11:55 am

Blaze
NEWS AUGUST 02, 2020
'Wrong!': President Trump clashes with Dr. Fauci over surge of COVID-19 cases
The honeymoon is over
https://www.theblaze.com/news/trump-fauci-coronavirus-surge?utm_source=theblaze-dailyPM&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Daily-Newsletter__PM%202020-08-02&utm_term=TheBlaze%20Daily%20PM%20-%20last%20270%20days
President Donald Trump fiercely rejected Dr. Anthony Fauci's viewpoint on why the U.S. has experienced a new surge of COVID-19 cases.

POLL: Will Joe Biden still be the Democratic Party's presidential candidate when we get to November?
Dr. Fauci testified before the U.S. House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Crisis on Friday. Fauci, a top member of the White House coronavirus task force, gave his explanation as to why new cases of coronavirus in European countries are decreasing while surging in the United States.

"If you look at what happened in Europe when they shut down or locked down or went into shelter-in-place. … They really did it to the tune of about 95-plus percent of the country did that," Fauci said. "When you actually look at what we did, even though we shut down, even though we created a great deal of difficulty, we really functionally shut down only about 50 percent in the sense of the totality of the country."

Trump staunchly responded to a CBS News video of Fauci's comments by saying, "Wrong! We have more cases because we have tested far more than any other country, 60,000,000. If we tested less, there would be less cases. How did Italy, France & Spain do? Now Europe sadly has flare ups. Most of our governors worked hard & smart. We will come back STRONG!"


The U.S. has tested approximately 60 million people for coronavirus. The European country with the most COVID-19 testing is the U.K., with over 16 million. Germany has tested 8 million, total testing for Italy and Spain is nearly 7 million, and France is at 3 million.

The U.S. has the fourth-most COVID-19 tests per one million population among countries most severely impacted by the coronavirus pandemic, trailing Qatar, Russia, and the U.K., which has the highest testing rate in the world.

The U.S. has 4.7 million confirmed COVID-19 cases, the most in the world. The U.S. also has the most novel coronavirus deaths, nearly 158,000.

Trump isn't the only one to clash with the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases over his recent testimony. Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) grilled Fauci during Friday's hearing about the impact that nationwide protests have had on the spread of coronavirus. Trump retweeted the video of the tense exchange between Jordan and Fauci.

"Great job by Jim Jordan, and also some very good statements by Tony Fauci," Trump wrote on Twitter. "Big progress being made!"

Last month, Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) berated Fauci over what he called the politicization of the COVID-19 response, especially the reopening of schools.
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 66349
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 75
Location : Wales UK

https://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

CORONAVIRUS  (COVID-19)  Empty Re: CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19)

Post  Admin on Sat 01 Aug 2020, 10:05 pm

https://www.theblaze.com/news/dutch-government-rejects-mandated-masks?utm_source=theblaze-breaking&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=20200731Trending-HCQDocFired&utm_term=ACTIVE%20LIST%20-%20TheBlaze%20Breaking%20News
NEWS JULY 31, 2020
Dutch government rejects mandated masks, says they could actually increase risk of transmission
'No proven effectiveness of masks'
Photo by Sean Gallup/Getty Images
 SARAH TAYLOR
Dutch Minister for Medical Care Tamara van Ark said the government refuses to require the public to wear masks amid the COVID-19 pandemic.
The government made the announcement Wednesday, insisting that the effectiveness of masks in fighting the spread of coronavirus in the Netherlands remains unproven.

Van Ark made the announcement following recommendations from the country's National Institute for Health.

Instead, the government and its health departments will lean heavily on social distancing to prevent the spread of COVID-19.

In remarks from The Hague, van Ark said, "Because from a medical perspective there is no proven effectiveness of masks, the Cabinet has decided that there will be no national obligation for wearing non-medical masks."

According to a Wednesday Politico report, van Ark said Dutch cities are still independently free to "experiment with a toolbox of measures" — including mandatory masks — in order to tamp down the spread of COVID-19.


National Institute for Health virologist Jaap van Dissel said that the department was not convinced mask-wearing would benefit people of the Netherlands — and, in fact, could be harmful to their health.

According to Reuters, Dissel argued that "wearing masks incorrectly, together with worse adherence to social distancing rules" could actually increase the risk of a person transmitting the deadly virus.

“So we think that if you're going to use masks (in a public setting)," he said, "then you must give good training for it."

What else do we know?
On Friday, Dutch News reported that face masks will be compulsory in areas of Amsterdam and Rotterdam beginning Aug. 5.

Official localities mandated the new rule following the national government's decision to move away from required masks.

Rotterdam Mayor Ahmed Aboutaleb said that he will also enforce strict social distancing measures in conjunction with the mask mandate.

"I want to be able to say to myself that I did everything possible to avoid one Rotterdammer picking up or dying from coronavirus," he said. "In the main, it will get people to keep their distance ... and we think it will increase the sense of urgency."

READ MORE https://www.theblaze.com/news/dutch-government-rejects-mandated-masks?utm_source=theblaze-breaking&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=20200731Trending-HCQDocFired&utm_term=ACTIVE%20LIST%20-%20TheBlaze%20Breaking%20News
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 66349
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 75
Location : Wales UK

https://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

CORONAVIRUS  (COVID-19)  Empty Re: CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19)

Post  Admin on Sat 01 Aug 2020, 9:39 pm

https://www.theblaze.com/news/hydroxychloroquine-touting-doctor-fired?utm_source=theblaze-dailyPM&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Daily-Newsletter__PM%202020-07-31&utm_term=TheBlaze%20Daily%20PM%20-%20last%20270%20days
 
NEWS JULY 31, 2020
HCQ-touting doctor says she has been fired after appearing in viral video touting the drug as a COVID-19 treatment
'I was summarily fired for appearing in what was told to me is an embarrassing video'
Image Source: YouTube screenshot
 PHIL SHIVER
Dr. Simone Gold, the Los Angeles-based physician behind America's Frontline Doctors, a group advocating for hydroxychloroquine to be used in the fight against COVID-19, says she has been fired for expressing her medical opinion.

POLL: Will Joe Biden still be the Democratic Party's presidential candidate when we get to November?
Gold shared the news in an interview with Fox News host Tucker Carlson Thursday night, saying she was removed from her job due to her appearance in a viral video touting the efficacy of hydroxychloroquine.

"I'm a board-certified emergency physician for 20 years, and in fact, it seems like until five minutes ago I was considered a hero and people would be clapping and glad that I was doing what I was doing, and then the video came out and I was summarily fired for appearing in what was told to me is an embarrassing video," Gold told Carlson.

Gold, who graduated from Chicago Medical School in 1989 and completed her residency at Stony Brook University Hospital in New York, appeared in the controversial "White Coat Summit" video earlier this week, organized by her organization and conservative political organization, Tea Party Patriots.

A 40-minute video of a news conference that took place during the summit was posted across social media platforms and quickly garnered millions of views. In the video, one of the doctors, Dr. Stella Immanuel, a Houston pediatrician and religious minister, referred to studies that claim hydroxychloroquine doesn't work as "fake science."

The video was shared widely on Facebook and Twitter by many, including President Donald Trump and his son, Donald Trump Jr.

Shortly after the video was posted, however, it was removed by Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube for allegedly making false and dubious claims related to the coronavirus.

Gold said that in addition to the social media giants censoring the video, website host SquareSpace also shut down her organization's website.


Appearing on Glenn Beck's radio program Thursday, Gold reiterated many of her group's claims about the hysteria and controversy surrounding hydroxychloroquine, which she called a "complete myth."

"Hydroxychloroquine is an analogue or a derivative of quinine, which is found in tree bark. It's the most noncontroversial of medications that there is," she said.

"It's been around for centuries and it's been FDA-approved in the modern version, called hydroxychloroquine, for 65 years," she continued. "In all of that time, [doctors] used it for breast-feeding women, pregnant women, elderly, children, and immune compromised. The typical use is for years or even decades because we give it mostly to RA, rheumatoid arthritis patients and lupus patients who need to be on it, essentially, all of their life. So, we have extensive experience with it ... it's one of the most commonly used medications throughout the world."
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 66349
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 75
Location : Wales UK

https://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

CORONAVIRUS  (COVID-19)  Empty Re: CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19)

Post  Admin on Sun 12 Jul 2020, 10:06 pm

Children Have 0.00% Chance of Dying from COVID but are Harmed for Life by Social Distancing, Which has its Roots in CIA Torture Techniques
Comments by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

California Civil Rights Attorney Leigh Dundas published a video on Facebook this week to show the devastating consequences of isolating children and forcing them to practice “social distancing” at places like school.

Here are some lesser known facts about social distancing and isolation:

• It was developed 70 years ago by the CIA to break down enemies of state.

• It is the equivalent of smoking 15 cigarettes a day AND being an alcoholic.

• It doubles the risk of death, and destroys the part of the brain responsible for learning.

She pointed out that according to the statistics and the CDC:

• A child’s risk of dying from COVID is 0.0%, per the CDC.

• No child has passed on COVID to a family member or third party (they do not transmit).

She goes on to explain the historical origins of practicing Social Distancing, and how the technique was developed by the CIA to torture “enemies of the state.”

Watch the video:



Here is a summary of her research designed to educate school administrators so that they abolish social distancing rules in schools.

Sample Letter to School on Harms from Social Distancing
Legal-Medical Opinion On Possible Changes to 2020-2021 School Year due to COVID

by Attorney Leigh Dundas

I write today to highlight certain factors that will hopefully serve to inform what are likely ongoing embryonic conversations at the District level, relating to COVID and the 2020-21 school year – and further – to urge a particular path of restraint during such conversations based on abundant scientific, medical, neuro-cognitive and legal considerations which have now emerged.

At the beginning of this letter, I want to acknowledge that it is quite obvious that there is a virus, which can be sometimes fatal, particularly to certain demographics. That said, there are also a federal and state constitution – which have been to some degree overlooked by certain states in their rush to contain the virus – as well as data in the form of hard math and hard science, which is now emerging in the context of COVID, and which bears review.

Math on COVID was Wrong
The study that precipitated the lockdown of more than 95% of America’s population (and indeed, the planet’s population) was authored by Neil Ferguson, out of the UK. It predicted deaths in the millions. This alarming conclusion was taken into account by leaders of most nations, and acted on accordingly. America acted by quarantining – not the sick – but the approximately 311 million Americans who were not sick, and putting them under the functional equivalent of house arrest, for an indefinite period of time. Interestingly, after a mere one day of himself being under lockdown in the UK, the study’s author walked back his math a shocking ninety-six percent (96%): his revision of deaths in his own country went from a predicted 500,000 down to 20,000.

At this juncture, allow me to point out the obvious, using an analogy involving my daughter:  if my daughter Katya routinely said the answer to a math problem this year was 100, when it was indeed only 4 – and Katya continued to get her math problems wrong by 96% – she would receive a failing grade in math from Foothill High.  And rightly so:  with such incompetence in basic arithmetic reflected on her transcript, I would hope that she not be hired by anyone, anywhere, in any serious job that required basic math, as such degree of error – in engineering, statistics, or any job – would have fatal consequences (imagine if the degree of slope in a freeway overpass were 96% wrong).
MORE https://vaccineimpact.com/2020/children-have-0-00-chance-of-dying-from-covid-but-are-harmed-for-life-by-social-distancing-which-has-its-roots-in-cia-torture-techniques/?fbclid=IwAR1MR8X-yg3kF6ZGno-YNLTsQDVf2RPXYyFBwme0JViAsoTdogjn8yoDtyM
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 66349
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 75
Location : Wales UK

https://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

CORONAVIRUS  (COVID-19)  Empty Re: CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19)

Post  Admin on Fri 10 Jul 2020, 10:23 am

THE FOLLOWING STATEMENT has been doing the rounds. Since it is anonymous, it cannot be verified, so we post it as is.
Released 08/07/20. I am a consultant at a major regional hospital in Surrey, UK. By major you can take that to indicate that we have an A&E department. I had agreed to give an interview to an anti-lockdown activist in which I would have revealed my identity. I have since changed my mind and only feel able to give an anonymous statement.
I have changed my mind simply because all staff, no matter what grade, at all hospitals have been warned that if they give any media interviews at all, or make any statements to either the mainstream press or smaller, independent press /social media, we may, immediately be suspended without pay. I have a family, dependents, and I simply can’t do it to them. I therefore cannot reveal my identity at this time but wish to state as follows:
In my opinion, and that of many of my colleagues, there has been no COVID Pandemic, certainly not in the Surrey region, and I have heard from other colleagues that this picture is the same throughout the country. Our hospital would normally expect to see around 350,000 out-patients a year. Around 95,000 patients are admitted to hospital in a normal, year and we would expect to see around a similar figure, perhaps 100,000 patients pass through our A&E department.
In the months from March to June (inclusive) we would normally expect to see 100,000 out-patients, around 30,000 patients admitted to hospital, and perhaps 30,000 pass through A&E. This year (and these figures are almost impossible to get hold of) we are over 95% down on all those numbers. In effect, the hospital has been pretty much empty for that entire period.
At the start, staff that questioned this were told that we were being used as ‘redundant’ capacity, kept back for the ‘deluge’ we were told would come. It never did come, and when staff began to question this, comments like, ‘for the greater good’ and to ‘protect the NHS’ came down from above.
Now it’s just along the lines of, ‘Shut up or you don’t get paid’. The few COVID cases that we have had get repeatedly tested, and every single test counted as a new case, meaning the figures reported back to ONS/PHE (Office for National Statistics & Public Health England) were almost exponentially inflated. It could be that COVID cases reported by hospitals are between 5 to 10x higher than the real number of cases. There has been no pandemic, and this goes a long way to explain why figures for the UK are so much higher than anywhere else in Europe.
The trust has been running empty ambulances during lockdown, and is still doing it now. By this I mean ambulances are driving around with their emergency alert systems active (sirens &/or lights) with no job to go to. This I believe has been to give the impression to the public that there is more demand for ambulances than there actually is. Staff only wear face coverings/masks and social distance when interacting with the public. As soon as they are out of public view, the masks come off and social distancing is not observed. Indeed jokes are made about the measures, and I have heard staff express amazement that despite warnings on packets and at point-of-sales telling people masks are totally ineffective and dangerous , the public still buy them, because a politician has told them too.
We have cancelled the vast majority of operations and of these ALL elective surgery has been cancelled. That’s surgery that has been pre-planned/waiting list. Non-elective surgery, this tends to be emergency surgery or that which is deemed urgent, has been severely curtailed. The outcome of this is simple. People are at best being denied basic medical care, and at worst being left to die, in some cases, in much distress and pain.
Regarding death certification. All staff that are responsible for this have been encouraged where possible to put COVID-19 complications as reason for death, even though the patient may have been asymptomatic and also not even tested for COVID. I feel this simply amounts to fraudulently completed death certificates and has been responsible for grossly inflating the number of COVID deaths. The fact is that regardless of what you actually die of in hospital, it is likely that COVID-19 will feature on your death certificate. I have included with my statement the detailed published guidance from Government on Death Certification which shows how COVID-19 as a factor is encouraged to at least feature on a death certificate.
Remember COVID-19 itself cannot kill. What kills is complications from the virus, typically pneumonia-like symptoms. These complications are in reality incredibly rare but have featured on a large number of death certificates issued in recent months. As long as COVID-19 appears on a death certificate, that death is counted as COVID-19 in the figures released by the ONS and PHE.
I genuinely believe that many death certificates, especially amongst the older 65+ demographic have been fraudulently completed so as to be counted as COVID-19 deaths when in reality COVID-19 complications did not cause the death. There have been Thursday nights when I stood alone in my office and cried as I heard people cheering and clapping outside. It sickens me to see all the ‘Thank You NHS’ signs up everywhere and the stolen rainbow that for me now says one word and word only: Fear.
There are many good people in the NHS, and whilst I do not plead forgiveness for myself, I do plead for them. Most are on low pay, they joined for the right reasons, and I did and have been bullied and threatened that if they don’t ‘stay on message’, they don’t eat. I know that if a way could be found to assure staff within the NHS of safety against reprisals, there would be a tsunami of whistleblowers which I have no doubt would help end this complete and brutal insanity.


I am finding it increasingly hard to live with what I have been involved in and I am sorry this has happened. To end, I would simply say this. Politicians haven’t changed, the country has just made a fatal mistake and started trusting them without question.
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 66349
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 75
Location : Wales UK

https://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

CORONAVIRUS  (COVID-19)  Empty Re: CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19)

Post  Admin on Fri 03 Jul 2020, 2:45 pm

[url=high-profile European pathologist is reporting that he and his colleagues across Europe have not found any evidence of any deaths from the novel coronavirus on that continent.]high-profile European pathologist is reporting that he and his colleagues across Europe have not found any evidence of any deaths from the novel coronavirus on that continent.[/url]

HERE


High-profile European pathologist is reporting that he and his colleagues across Europe have not found any evidence of any deaths from the novel coronavirus on that continent.

Dr. Stoian Alexov called the World Health Organization (WHO) a “criminal medical organization” for creating worldwide fear and chaos without providing objectively verifiable proof of a pandemic.

Another stunning revelation from Bulgarian Pathology Association (BPA) president Dr. Alexov is that he believes it’s currently “impossible” to create a vaccine against the virus.

He also revealed that European pathologists haven’t identified any antibodies that are specific for SARS-CoV-2.

These stunning statements raise major questions, including about officials’ and scientists’ claims regarding the many vaccines they’re rushing into clinical trials around the world.

They also raise doubt about the veracity of claims of discovery of anti-novel-coronavirus antibodies (which are beginning to be used to treat patients).

Novel-coronavirus-specific antibodies are supposedly the basis for the expensive serology test kits being used in many countries (some of which have been found to be unacceptably inaccurate).

And they’re purportedly key to the immunity certificates coveted by Bill Gates that are about to go into widespread use — in the form of the COVI-PASS — in 15 countries including the UK, US, and Canada.

Dr. Alexov made his jaw-dropping observations in a video interview summarizing the consensus of participants in a May 8, 2020, European Society of Pathology (ESP) webinar on COVID-19.

The May 13 video interview of Dr. Alexov was conducted by Dr. Stoycho Katsarov, chair of the Center for Protection of Citizens’ Rights in Sofia and a former Bulgarian deputy minister of health. The video is on the BPA’s website, which also highlights some of Dr. Alexov’s main points.

We asked a native Bulgarian speaker with a science background to orally translate the video interview into English. We then transcribed her translation. The video is here and our English transcript is here.

Among the major bombshells Dr. Alexov dropped is that the leaders of the May 8 ESP webinar said no novel-coronavirus-specific antibodies have been found.

The body forms antibodies specific to pathogens it encounters. These specific antibodies are known as monoclonal antibodies and are a key tool in pathology. This is done via immunohistochemistry, which involves tagging antibodies with colours and then coating the biopsy- or autopsy-tissue slides with them. After giving the antibodies time to bind to the pathogens they’re specific for, the pathologists can look at the slides under a microscope and see the specific places where the coloured antibodies — and therefore the pathogens they’re bound to – are located.

Therefore, in the absence of monoclonal antibodies to the novel coronavirus, pathologists cannot verify whether SARS-CoV-2 is present in the body, or whether the diseases and deaths attributed to it indeed were caused by the virus rather than by something else.

It would be easy to dismiss Dr. Alexov as just another crank ‘conspiracy theorist.’ After all many people believe they’re everywhere these days, spreading dangerous misinformation about COVID-19 and other issues.

In addition, little of what Dr. Alexov alleges was the consensus from the May 8 webinar is in the publicly viewable parts of the proceedings.

But keep in mind that whistleblowers often stand alone because the vast majority of people are afraid to speak out publicly.

Also, Dr. Alexov has an unimpugnable record and reputation. He’s been a physician for 30 years. He’s president of the BPA, a member of the ESP’s Advisory Board and head of the histopathology department at the Oncology Hospital in the Bulgarian capital of Sofia.

On top of that, there’s other support for what Dr. Alexov is saying.

For example, the director of the Institute of Forensic Medicine at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf in Germany said in media interviews that there’s a striking dearth of solid evidence for COVID-19’s lethality.

“COVID-19 is a fatal disease only in exceptional cases, but in most cases it is a predominantly harmless viral infection,” Dr. Klaus Püschel told a German paper in April. Adding in another interview:

In quite a few cases, we have also found that the current corona infection has nothing whatsoever to do with the fatal outcome because other causes of death are present, for example, a brain hemorrhage or a heart attack […] [COVID-19 is] not particularly dangerous viral disease […] All speculation about individual deaths that have not been expertly examined only fuel anxiety.”

Also, one of us (Rosemary) and another journalist, Amory Devereux, documented in a June 9 Off-Guardian article that the novel coronavirus has not fulfilled Koch’s postulates.

These postulates are scientific steps used to prove whether a virus exists and has a one-to-one relationship with a specific disease. We showed that to date no one has proven SARS-CoV-2 causes a discrete illness matching the characteristics of all the people who ostensibly died from COVID-19. Nor has the virus has been isolated, reproduced and then shown to cause this discrete illness.

In addition, in a June 27 Off-Guardian article two more journalists, Torsten Engelbrecht and Konstantin Demeter, added to the evidence that “the existence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA is based on faith, not fact.”

The pair also confirmed “there is no scientific proof that those RNA sequences [deemed to match that of the novel coronavirus] are the causative agent of what is called COVID-19.”

Dr. Alexov stated in the May 13 interview that:

the main conclusion [of those of us who participated in the May 8 webinar] was that the autopsies that were conducted in Germany, Italy, Spain, France and Sweden do not show that the virus is deadly.”

He added that:

What all of the pathologists said is that there’s no one who has died from the coronavirus. I will repeat that: no one has died from the coronavirus.”

Dr. Alexov also observed there is no proof from autopsies that anyone deemed to have been infected with the novel coronavirus died only from an inflammatory reaction sparked by the virus (presenting as interstitial pneumonia) rather than from other potentially fatal diseases.

Another revelation of his is that:

“We need to see exactly how the law will deal with immunization and that vaccine that we’re all talking about, because I’m certain it’s [currently] not possible to create a vaccine against COVID. I’m not sure what exactly Bill Gates is doing with his laboratories – is it really a vaccine he’s producing, or something else?”

As pointed to above, the inability to identify monoclonal antibodies for the virus suggests there is no basis for the vaccines, serological testing and immunity certificates being rolled out around the globe at unprecedented speed and cost. In fact, there is no solid evidence the virus exists.

Dr. Alexov made still more important points. For example, he noted that, in contrast to the seasonal influenza, SARS-CoV-2 hasn’t been proven to kill youth:

[With the flu] we can find one virus which can cause a young person to die with no other illness present […] In other words, the coronavirus infection is an infection that does not lead to death. And the flu can lead to death.”

(There have been reports of severe maladies such as Kawasaki-like disease and stroke in young people who were deemed to have a novel-coronavirus infection. However, the majority of published papers on these cases are very short and include only one or only a small handful of patients. Moreover, commenters on the papers note it’s impossible to determine the role of the virus because the papers’ authors did not control sufficiently, if at all, for confounding factors. It’s most likely that children’s deaths attributed to COVID-19 in fact are from multiple organ failure resulting from the combination of the drug cocktail and ventilation that these children are subjected to.)

Dr. Alexov therefore asserted that:

the WHO is creating worldwide chaos, with no real facts behind what they’re saying.”

Among the myriad ways the WHO is creating that chaos is by prohibiting almost all autopsies of people deemed to have died from COVID-19. As a result, reported Dr. Alexov, by May 13 only three such autopsies had been conducted in Bulgaria.

Also, the WHO is dictating that everyone said to be infected with the novel coronavirus who subsequently dies must have their deaths attributed to COVID-19.

“That’s quite stressful for us, and for me in particular, because we have protocols and procedures which we need to use,” he told Dr. Katsarov. “…And another pathologist 100 years from now is going to say, ‘Hey, those pathologists didn’t know what they were doing [when they said the cause of death was COVID-19]!’ So we need to be really strict with our diagnoses, because they could be proven [or disproven], and they could be checked again later.”

He disclosed that pathologists in several countries in Europe, as well as in China, Australia and Canada are strongly resisting the pressure on them to attribute deaths to COVID-19 alone:

I’m really sad that we need to follow the [WHO’s] instructions without even thinking about them. But in Germany, France, Italy and England they’re starting to think that we shouldn’t follow the WHO so strictly, and [instead] when we’re writing the cause of death we should have some pathology [results to back that up] and we should follow the protocol. [That’s because] when we say something we need to be able to prove it.”

(He added that autopsies could have helped confirm or disprove the theory that many of the people deemed to have died of COVID-19 in Italy had previously received the H1N1 flu vaccine. Because, as he noted, the vaccine suppresses adults’ immune systems and therefore may have been a significant contributor to their deaths by making them much more susceptible to infection.)

Drs. Alexov and Katsarov agreed that yet another aspect of the WHO-caused chaos and its fatal consequences is many people are likely to die soon from diseases such as cancer because the lockdowns, combined with the emptying of hospitals (ostensibly to make room for COVID-19 patients), halted all but the most pressing procedures and treatments.

They also observed these diseases are being exacerbated by the fear and chaos surrounding COVID-19.

We know that stress significantly suppresses the immune system, so I can really claim 200% that all the chronic diseases will be more severe and more acute per se. Specifically in situ carcinoma – over 50% of these are going to become more invasive […] So I will say that this epidemic isn’t so much an epidemic of the virus, it’s an epidemic of giving people a lot of fear and stress.”

In addition, posited Dr. Alexov, as another direct and dire result of the pandemic panic many people are losing faith in physicians.

Because in my opinion the coronavirus isn’t that dangerous, and how are people going to have trust in me doing cancer pathology, much of which is related to viruses as well? But nobody is talking about that.”

We emailed Dr. Alexov several questions, including asking why he believes it’s impossible to create a vaccine against COVID-19.

He didn’t answer the questions directly. Dr. Alexov instead responded:


We also emailed five of Dr. Alexov’s colleagues in the European Pathology Society asking them to confirm Dr. Alexov’s revelations. We followed up by telephone with two of them. None responded.

Why didn’t Dr. Alexov or his five colleagues answer our questions?

We doubt it’s due to lack of English proficiency.

It’s more likely because of the pressure on pathologists to follow the WHO’s directives and not speak out publicly. (And, on top of that, pathology departments depend on governments for their funding.)

Nonetheless, pathologists like Drs. Alexov and Püschel appear to be willing to step out and say that no one has died from a novel-coronavirus infection.

Perhaps that’s because pathologists’ records and reputations are based on hard physical evidence rather than on subjective interpretation of tests, signs and symptoms. And there is no hard physical evidence that COVID-19 is deadly.
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 66349
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 75
Location : Wales UK

https://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

CORONAVIRUS  (COVID-19)  Empty Re: CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19)

Post  Admin on Mon 22 Jun 2020, 6:45 pm

Patriotic News Item
Janet Curtis Patriotic News
What? Only 19 pandemic deaths out of 35 million people in a state in India? How did they do it?
Please read the whole article from the Auruma project (6 June 2020), its interesting and informative and certainly seems like the people in this little corner of India ( little if you look at a map) have managed to achieve something wholesome and purposeful in its approach to the c v -and it worked .

Edit: I’ve also added a link in comments to the Hindu who reported on 25 April 2020)
“The third COVID-19-related death in Kerala, of a four-month-old female baby, from Manjeri in Malappuram district, was reported on Friday morning. The infant, with congenital heart disease, and under treatment for pneumonia and respiratory problems, passed away at the Institute of Maternal and Child Health (IMCH), at the Government Medical College Hospital in Kozhikode.”

Homeopathic medical research
Phil Keay It's a forward thinking state in India, with great literacy, and a bit of an activist history. In addition it's the home state in India for Ayurveda, the main Indian health care modality for about 5000 years which is founded on prevention, and teaching people how to stay healthy. The article shows just how powerful a community can be when all sectors get input, and where the powerful listen to the ordinary people on the ground. It's a truly heartwarming article, informative, and should be read by every single health department of every single nation on the planet.

https://aurumproject.org.au/kerala-health-policy-covid/?utm_campaign=shareaholic&utm_medium=facebook&utm_source=socialnetwork&fbclid=IwAR0A0tBBZPz455HXrFEdwgximwvAK-z_-7TT18KVIyKWNo6KpL_H3EpweI4
What? Only 19 pandemic deaths out of 35 million people in a state in India? How did they do it?
June 6, 2020 By Linlee Jordan

19 deaths out of a population of 35 million. How did they do it?
Kerala, in India’s south-west, has achieved what other countries could only dream of. Its Health Policy is simple yet powerful.

Not only do rates of infant mortality keep improving, but life expectancy also keeps getting better. Now, with such success with Covid-19, the world surely must ask: “What are they doing right?” The Kerala Health Policy has been described as respectful, sustainable and harmonious. These are huge adjectives for any public healthcare system.

Quite simply, the government encouraged people’s participation, respectfully listened to what their population asked of them and then acted upon it. It goes without saying, in the midst of this Coronavirus Pandemic, that only 19 deaths is just gobsmacking. (When this blog was first written there were 14, then 15 and now 19 deaths as of 15th June, which I will repeat is still quite incredible.)

The statistics speak of success, even though Kerala faces the challenges of:

High unemployment rates
35 million people in a geographically small state
High proportion of the elderly
Recent financial constraints due to two major floods and Nipah virus outbreaks in 2018 and 2019. 
How they did it
The government’s robust response in the pandemic included many not-so-small efforts designed to support and care for its people:

Each district was asked to dedicate two hospitals to Coronavirus patients, while each medical college set aside 500 beds. Separate entrances and exits were designated
Thousands of shelters for stranded migrant workers were built
Accredited Social Health Activists went house to house checking on people and delivered staples
Distributed millions of cooked meals to those in need
Encouraged the use of homeopathy by distributing millions of preventative medicines
Provided logistical support to quarantined people to access food and supplies
Offered counselling
Negotiated with Internet Service Providers to give better internet data packages for those in isolation.
The state has won praise for its handling of a pandemic that has overwhelmed other health systems in resource-rich countries like Europe and the USA which have suffered high mortality rates. 

Last edited 15/6/2020. The information in the table below is from news.google.com

Covid statistics in the state of Kerala (India) compared to USA, UK and India

See next article. 


https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/coronavirus-four-month-old-dies-in-kerala-2-deaths-in-ap/article31428670.ece?fbclid=IwAR1FDR60HwvGzWjy2YoqFDwDBpmCgwRXEjVGuwUAJ0g0gavi4r8USAtcGcM
Coronavirus | Four-month-old dies in Kerala, 2 deaths in A.P.
SPECIAL CORRESPONDENTTHIRUVANANTHAPURAM/VIJAYAWADA/BENGALURU/HYDERABAD, APRIL 25, 2020 04:51 IST
UPDATED: APRIL 25, 2020 03:10 IST
SHARE ARTICLE 0PRINTA A A
Karnataka’ s new cases come from Ramanagaram jail and Bengaluru labour colony; 13 more test positive in Telangana
The third COVID-19-related death in Kerala, of a four-month-old female baby, from Manjeri in Malappuram district, was reported on Friday morning. The infant, with congenital heart disease, and under treatment for pneumonia and respiratory problems, passed away at the Institute of Maternal and Child Health (IMCH), at the Government Medical College Hospital in Kozhikode.

Two deaths were reported in Andhra Pradesh, from Anantapur and Kurnool districts, taking the toll to 29.

In Karnataka, a total of 29 new COVID-19 cases were reported on Friday raising the total to 474.

The COVID-19 protocol was followed when interring the baby in Kerala. Samples from the child’s parents were sent for tests. Doctors who cared for her in Malappuram were asked to be in quarantine, and work was on to trace the source of infection.

Condoling the death, Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan said it was a matter of concern that the source of the infant’s infection remained unknown. Massive efforts were on to trace the epidemiological links and to do testing on a large scale.

On Friday, three persons tested positive in the State while 15 were declared disease-free, including a 62-year-old at Pathanamthitta who spent 47 days in hospital after testing positive.

All new cases were from Kasaragod and they contracted the disease through imported cases. Kerala had so far reported 450 positive cases. While 116 were in treatment, 331 recovered.

Kannur district has the maximum number of COVID-19 patients, with 56 persons in hospitals. Mr. Vijayan said as a stark warning that “nothing is over yet” on COVID-19. “We are looking at disease transmission projections which say we will have to arrange treatment facilities for several lakhs,” he said, at the media briefing.

A.P. tests more
In Andhra Pradesh, 6,306 samples tested in a day turned up 62 fresh cases, taking the tally to 955. So far, 145 patients had recovered and been discharged, while 29 succumbed to the virus and 781 were under treatment.

Nearly 67% of cases were from Kurnool, Guntur, Krishna and Chittoor districts, the majority from old clusters, said Special Chief Secretary, Health K.S. Jawahar Reddy.


 
Bengaluru police personnel involved in quarantine and surveillance work would undergo testing for COVID-19, Primary and Secondary Education Minister S. Suresh Kumar said.

The latest cases included five from Ramanagaram district jail and 11 from the labour colony at Hongasandra ward, in Bengaluru.

GHMC area in focus
In Telangana 13 more persons tested positive on Friday, and the total was 983. In all, 29 were discharged, a category now totalling 291 people. The State had 667 active cases under treatment.

Health Minister Eatala Rajender said the Hyderabad Municipal (GHMC) area, Vikarabad, Suryapet and Jogulamba Gadwal districts were reporting cases.

A letter from the Editor
Dear reader,

We have been keeping you up-to-date with information on the developments in India and the world that have a bearing on our health and wellbeing, our lives and livelihoods, during these difficult times. To enable wide dissemination of news that is in public interest, we have increased the number of articles that can be read free, and extended free trial periods. However, we have a request for those who can afford to subscribe: please do. As we fight disinformation and misinformation, and keep apace with the happenings, we need to commit greater resources to news gathering operations. We promise to deliver quality journalism that stays away from vested interest and political propaganda.
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 66349
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 75
Location : Wales UK

https://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

CORONAVIRUS  (COVID-19)  Empty Re: CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19)

Post  Admin on Tue 16 Jun 2020, 11:38 pm

https://www.newsweek.com/russian-state-television-pushes-conspiracy-theory-bill-gates-behind-coronavirus-pandemic-1501465?fbclid=IwAR3o68xYDYnkKJcnIb8eKdcqR9Hhv0Nn9OklwhKep0MRm2XIS1KfT0Lq-IM
Russian State Television Pushes Conspiracy Theory Bill Gates Is Behind Coronavirus Pandemic
BY BRENDAN COLE ON 5/1/20 AT 11:45 AM EDT
Pause
Unmute
Current Time 0:50
/
Duration 3:36
 
QualityFullscreen
SHARE
WORLD
RUSSIA
CORONAVIRUS
BILL GATES
The conspiracy theory that Bill Gates is responsible for the coronavirus pandemic has been pushed on Russian state television, with the European Union warning that some state media outlets in Russia are trying to create confusion with bogus theories about the virus.

The prime-time program Man and Law, which is broadcast on the country's Channel 1 network, ran a 15-minute segment in which Gates was described as a billionaire sponsor of the World Health Organization (WHO) who sought to "reduce the population of the planet." Some 51% of Channel 1's shares are owned by representatives of the Russian state.

Radio Free Europe reported that the segment, broadcast on April 24, drew on a number of controversial online sources including a homeopathy website, an anti-vaccination campaigner and a Canadian pro-life, site to smear Gates, who has pledged $250 million to develop a coronavirus vaccine.

Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty
?
@RFERL
Russian state media dedicated prime time to amplifying conspiracy theories that Bill Gates is behind the coronavirus pandemic. An EU report says Russian state media are running a campaign to "sow confusion" about the origins of the virus.

Embedded video
260
5:00 AM - May 1, 2020
Twitter Ads info and privacy
290 people are talking about this
The Russian TV show also referred to a TED Talk that Gates gave in 2015 in which he warned about the dangers of a coming pandemic, suggesting that he knew about the coronavirus in advance. It also insinuated that the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation would profit from the vaccine.

Newsweek has contacted the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation for comment. In a podcast with Vox, the philanthropist said such misinformation was dangerous, "particularly in this type of crisis where people's willingness to believe wild things is heightened."

Such theories linking the Microsoft founder to the coronavirus are not new, with analysis last month by The New York Times and media analytics company Zignal Labs, saying that the link was mentioned more than 1.2 million times on TV and social media between February and April.

However, analysis by the European Commission shows that Russian media has been peddling a number of other conspiracy theories about the coronavirus.
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 66349
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 75
Location : Wales UK

https://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

CORONAVIRUS  (COVID-19)  Empty Re: CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19)

Post  Admin on Mon 15 Jun 2020, 12:32 am

BOOM! Guess Who is Calling the Shots on Human Experimentation?


 https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=9&v=jkYen0g4TRU&feature=emb_logo

Amazing Polly

312K subscribers
I have to set the stage, so BOOM comes at about 10 minutes in.
This is HUGE!  Medical Ethics should be front and center right now what with Big Pharma and NGOs like the Gates Foundation trying to rush an experimental RNA vaccine to market.  In this video I uncover a MASSIVE conflict of interest in the US.  Who is Christine Grady?  
BONUS BOOM near the end.

Thanks for being here! I am honoured to have what I believe to be the best informed, most kind, generous, hilarious and generous audience on youtube and bitchute.  You are the best.  If you can spare it during this most unstable time, I accept 'thank you tips' at my Paypal address here:  https://paypal.me/PollyStGeorge.  OR, if you prefer regular mail, my PO Box address can be found at:  https://amazingpolly.net/contact.
THANK YOU!

My bitchute video backup is here:  https://www.bitchute.com/channel/ZofF...

References:  
Christine Grady NIH: https://clinicalcenter.nih.gov/meet-o...

Fauci head of Gates Vaccine unit: https://philanthropynewsdigest.org/ne...

Fauci on Board of Decade of Vaccines: https://www.gatesfoundation.org/Media...

Fauci Grady Brazil: https://www.newsbreak.com/news/0OYeiT...

Fauci AIDS Vaccine NIH: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11363...

Grady President Comm on Bioethics: https://bioethicsarchive.georgetown.e...

Fauci C=span Project Hope / China: https://www.c-span.org/video/?c486786...

Grady Powerpoint Presentation 2017: https://www.bioethics.nih.gov/courses...

Grady / Emmanuel paper on Bioethics:  https://collab.its.virginia.edu/acces...
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 66349
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 75
Location : Wales UK

https://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

CORONAVIRUS  (COVID-19)  Empty Re: CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19)

Post  Admin on Sun 14 Jun 2020, 4:35 pm

Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 66349
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 75
Location : Wales UK

https://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

CORONAVIRUS  (COVID-19)  Empty Re: CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19)

Post  Admin on Fri 12 Jun 2020, 11:04 pm

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/former-uk-prime-minister-calls-for-coronavirus-digital-ids-to-prove-disease-status
Former UK prime minister calls for coronavirus digital IDs to prove ‘disease status’
'Unless you're able to record some of this data in a way that people can use it's going to be difficult to go back to anything like a near normal in things like transport,' said Tony Blair.
Thu Jun 11, 2020 - 3:28 pm EST

Paul SmeatonBy Paul Smeaton
PETITION: No to mandatory vaccination for the coronavirus! Sign the petition here.

UNITED KINGDOM, June 11, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) — Former U.K. Prime Minister Tony Blair has called for the creation of digital IDs to track “disease status” as part of the plans for restarting international travel after the global coronavirus crisis.

Blair, who now leads the Tony Blair Institute for Global Change, said in a recorded message digital IDs were a “natural evolution of the way that we're going to use technology in any event to transact daily life, and this covid crisis gives an additional reason for doing that.”

“I could be wrong about this, but when I can look at for example how you restart some businesses, how you restart international travel…I think people's disease status, for example have they been tested? What is the result of that test? Have they had the disease? Do they have the disease? I think unless you're able to record some of this data in a way that people can use it's going to be difficult to go back to anything like a near normal in things like transport,” Blair said.

An article published in Forbes last month said that future air travel could involve “no cabin bags, no lounges, no automatic upgrades, face masks, surgical gloves, self-check-in, self-bag-drop-off, immunity passports, on-the-spot blood tests and sanitation disinfection tunnels.”

“Digital technologies and automation will play a critical role in the future of air travel,” Forbes predicted. 

 SUBSCRIBE to LifeSite's daily headlines
Email address
SUBSCRIBE
U.S. Canada World Catholic
“The need to reduce ‘touchpoints’ at airports implies mandatory use of biometric boarding that allows passengers to board planes with only their face as a passport.”

The Forbes article noted that a number of airlines including British Airways, Qantas, and EasyJet are already using the technology.

Earlier this week an article published in The Guardian warned that proof of immunity to the coronavirus could be used to create “a new class system.” 


“Experts predict that if [coronavirus] survivors are found to be immune, they could perform a range of jobs and services – such as volunteering in hospitals and nursing homes, caring for coronavirus patients and working in shops and food processing plants – risk-free,” journalist Miranda Bryant wrote. 

“And, depending on how authorities, business and society at large respond, they could also be entitled to greater freedoms.”

Bryant pointed to Chile issuing “release certificates” to people who “complete quarantine after testing positive” for the coronavirus and comments from Dr. Anthony Fauci and Dr. Ezekiel J Emanuel supporting the idea of immunity “certificates” or “passports.”

Emanuel is advising former Vice President and 2020 candidate Joe Biden. Fauci has been director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases for decades and is one of the top people leading President Donald Trump’s coronavirus response.

Even left-wing groups such as The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) have cautioned against plans to introduce coronavirus “immunity passports.” In an article published last month, senior members of the ACLU argued that immunity passports could “harm public health, incentivize economically-vulnerable people to risk their health by contracting COVID-19, exacerbate racial and economic disparities, and lead to a new health surveillance infrastructure that endangers privacy rights.”

“An immunity passport system is fundamentally different from a regime whereby employers routinely test workers for COVID-19 or screen for symptoms, to ensure that no one with active infection is entering a workplace. In the latter system, only contagious workers are prevented from going to work and only for the period of time in which they are contagious,” the article continues.

“But an immunity passport system would divide workers into two classes — the immune and the non-immune — and the latter might never be eligible for a given job short of contracting and surviving COVID-19 if an immune worker is available to take the slot.”
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 66349
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 75
Location : Wales UK

https://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

CORONAVIRUS  (COVID-19)  Empty Re: CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19)

Post  Admin on Tue 09 Jun 2020, 2:12 pm

https://www.spiked-online.com/2020/05/15/we-could-open-up-again-and-forget-the-whole-thing/?fbclid=IwAR3cHk10mNQHbTTgfWP177UdZVLV6xj1KXByXAtWW3kQSgkxQx9UfMqy2TM#.Xt82T2Dgp91.facebook
‘We could open up again and forget the whole thing’
Epidemiologist Knut Wittkowski on the deadly consequences of lockdown.


SPIKED
15th May 2020
‘We could open up again and forget the whole thing’
Share
TopicsPOLITICS SCIENCE & TECH UK USA WORLD
Governments around the world say they are following ‘The Science’ with their draconian measures to stem the spread of the virus. But the science around Covid-19 is bitterly contested. Many experts have serious doubts about the effectiveness of the measures, and argue that our outsized fears of Covid-19 are not justified. Knut Wittkowski is one such expert who has long argued for a change of course. For 20 years, Wittkowski was the head of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Research Design at The Rockefeller University’s Center for Clinical and Translational Science. spiked spoke to him to find out more about the pandemic.




spiked: Is Covid-19 dangerous?


Knut Wittkowski: No, unless you have age-related severe comorbidities. So if you are in a nursing home because you cannot live by yourself anymore, then getting infected is dangerous.




We had the other extreme in Switzerland, which was hit pretty hard. There was one child that died. People believed that this child was born in 2011. In fact, it was born in 1911, and that was the only child that died. It was a mere coding error. Somebody with the age 108 was coded as aged eight.


spiked: How far along is the epidemic?


‘We cannot sit in our own little bubbles forever’ 
RECOMMENDED
‘We cannot sit in our own little bubbles forever’
SPIKED
Wittkowski: It is over in China. It is over in South Korea. It is substantially down in most of Europe and down a bit everywhere, even in the UK. The UK and Belarus are latecomers, so you do not see exactly what you are seeing in continental Europe. But everywhere in Europe, the number of cases is substantially declining.


spiked: Have our interventions made much of an impact?




Wittkowski: When the whole thing started, there was one reason given for the lockdown and that was to prevent hospitals from becoming overloaded. There is no indication that hospitals could ever have become overloaded, irrespective of what we did. So we could open up again, and forget the whole thing.


I hope the intervention did not have too much of an impact because it most likely made the situation worse. The intervention was to ‘flatten the curve’. That means that there would be the same number of cases but spread out over a longer period of time, because otherwise the hospitals would not have enough capacity.


Libya’s lawless government 
RECOMMENDED
Libya’s lawless government
ASSEM MIHIRIG
Now, as we know, children and young adults do not end up in hospitals. It is only those who are both elderly and have comorbidities that do. Therefore you have to protect the elderly and the nursing homes. The ideal approach would be to simply shut the door of the nursing homes and keep the personnel and the elderly locked in for a certain amount of time, and pay the staff overtime to stay there for 24 hours per day.


How long can you do that for? For three weeks, that is possible. For 18 months, it is not. The flattening of the curve, the prolongation of the epidemic, makes it more difficult to protect the elderly, who are at risk. More of the elderly people become infected, and we have more deaths.




spiked: What are the dangers of lockdown?


Wittkowski: Firstly, we have the direct consequences: suicides, domestic violence and other social consequences leading to death. And then we have people who are too scared to go to the hospitals for other problems like strokes or heart attacks. So people stay away from hospitals because of the Covid fear. And then they die.




spiked: Were hospitals likely to be overrun?


Wittkowski: Germany had 8,000 deaths in a population of 85million. They had 20,000 to 30,000 hospitalisations. In Germany, that is nothing. It does not even show up as a blip in the hospital statistics. In Britain, the highest hospital utilisation was about 60 per cent, if I am not mistaken.




In New York City, it was a bit higher. The Javits Congress Center was turned into a field hospital with 3,000 beds. It treated just 1,000 patients in all. The Navy ship sent to New York by President Trump had 179 patients but it was sent back because it was not needed. New York is the epicenter of the epidemic in the United States, and even here at the epicenter, hospital utilisation was only up a bit. Nothing dramatic. Nothing out of the ordinary. That is what happens during the flu season. People have the flu, and then there are more patients in the hospitals than there otherwise would be.


spiked: Are we on the way to reaching herd immunity?




Wittkowski: All the studies that have been done have shown that we already have at least 25 per cent of the population who are immune. That gives us a nice cushion. If 25 per cent of the population are already immune, we are very quickly getting to the 50 per cent that we need to have what is called herd immunity. We will actually get a bit higher than that. So we have flattened what otherwise would have been a peak, and if we now let it run, even if the number of cases would increase a bit, it would not get as high as it was, because we already have enough immune people in the population. So it is not going to spread as fast as it could have spread in the beginning.


spiked: Should we worry about a second spike?




Wittkowski: This is an invention to justify a policy that politicians are afraid of reversing.


spiked: Should people practice social distancing?


Wittkowski: No.


spiked: Why not?


Wittkowski: Why? What is the justification for that? People need to ask the government for an explanation. The government is restricting freedom. You do not have to ask me for justification. There is no justification. It is the government that has to justify what it is doing. Sorry, but that is how it is.


spiked: How did we get this so wrong?


Wittkowski: Governments did not have an open discussion, including economists, biologists and epidemiologists, to hear different voices. In Britain, it was the voice of one person – Neil Ferguson – who has a history of coming up with projections that are a bit odd. The government did not convene a meeting with people who have different ideas, different projections, to discuss his projection. If it had done that, it could have seen where the fundamental flaw was in the so-called models used by Neil Ferguson. His paper was published eventually, in medRxiv. The assumption was that one per cent of all people who became infected would die. There is no justification anywhere for that.


Let us say the epidemic runs with a basic reproduction rate of around two. Eventually 80 per cent of the population will be immune, because they have been infected at some point in time. Eighty per cent of the British population would be something like 50million. One per cent of them dying is 500,000. That is where Ferguson’s number came from.


But we knew from the very beginning that neither in Wuhan nor in South Korea did one per cent of all people infected die. South Korea has 60million people. It is about the same size as the UK. How many deaths were in South Korea? Did they shut down? No. The South Korean government was extremely proud to have resisted pressure to drop the very basic concepts of democracy.


The epidemic in South Korea was over by March, the number of cases was down by 13 March. In Wuhan they also did not shut down the economy. Wuhan had restricted travel out of the city. They stopped train services and blocked the roads. They did not restrict anything social within the city until very late. We have seen, then, in Wuhan and South Korea, if you do not do anything, the epidemic is over in three weeks.


Knowing that the epidemic would be over in three weeks, and the number of people dying would be minor, just like a normal flu, the governments started shutting down in mid-March. Why? Because somebody pulled it out of his head that one per cent of all infected would die. One could argue that maybe one per cent of all cases would die. But one per cent of all people infected does not make any sense. And we had that evidence by mid-March.


spiked: Just to clarify, cases are different from people infected?


Wittkowski: Cases means people who have symptoms that are serious enough for them to go to a hospital or get treated. Most people have no symptoms at all. But waking up with a sore throat one day is not a case. A case means that someone showed up in a hospital.


spiked: The UK government was also heavily influenced by the situation in Italy. Why did that go so wrong?


Wittkowski: What we saw in Italy was that the virus was hitting those who were both old and had comorbidities, so lots of people died. But the median age of those who died in Italy was around 81 years. It is not that children or working people were dying. It was the elderly in nursing homes – not even the elderly living by themselves mostly. We saw lots of deaths and that scared people. But then, Italy did an illogical thing. It closed schools so that the schoolchildren were isolated and did not get infected and did not become immune. Instead, the virus spread almost exclusively among the old, causing more deaths and a higher utilisation of hospitals. And that is mind-boggling.


Very early on, we knew from China and we knew from South Korea that this is an epidemic that runs its course, and there was nothing special about it. But when it hit Italy, we stopped thinking about it as an age-stratified problem, and instead lumped everyone all together. The idea that if we did not shut down the schools the hospitals would have been overwhelmed does not make any sense. I frankly still cannot fully understand how our governments can be so stupid.


spiked: Governments say they are following the science. Is that really true?


Wittkowski: They have the scientists on their side that depend on government funding. One scientist in Germany just got $500million from the government, because he always says what the government wants to hear.


Scientists are in a very strange situation. They now depend on government funding, which is a trend that has developed over the past 40 years. Before that, when you were a professor at a university, you had your salary and you had your freedom. Now, the university gives you a desk and access to the library. And then you have to ask for government money and write grant applications. If you are known to criticise the government, what does that do to your chance of getting funded? It creates a huge conflict of interest. The people who are speaking out in Germany and Switzerland are all independent of government money because they are retired.


spiked: Did the Swedish scientists get it right?


Wittkowski: Sweden did the right thing. And they had to take a lot of heat for it. Now compare Sweden and the UK. The only difference is that Sweden did fine. They did have a problem. They had a relatively high number of deaths among the nursing homes.They decided to keep society open and they forgot to close nursing homes. Remarkably, the politicians acknowledged that it was a mistake to extend that open concept to nursing homes. The nursing homes should have been isolated to protect the elderly who are at high risk. But I think the Swedish government is doing well to even acknowledge that mistake.


The first death in the United States was in a nursing home in Seattle. And that was by the end of February. So everybody knew that we were expecting the same thing that we had seen in Italy – an epidemic that hits the elderly. But until just this week in New York State, the government told the nursing homes that if they did not take in patients from hospitals, they would lose their funding. So they would have to import the virus from the hospitals.


One third of all deaths in New York State were in nursing homes. One could have prevented 20,000 deaths in the United States by just isolating the nursing homes. After three or four weeks, they could have reopened and everybody would be happy.


That would have been a reasonable strategy. But shutting down schools, driving the economy against the wall – there was no reason for it. The only reason that this nonsense now goes on and on, and people are inventing things like this ‘second wave’, which is going to force us to change society and never live again, is that the politicians are afraid of admitting an error.


spiked: Is this easier to see in hindsight?


Wittkowski: What I am talking about is not hindsight. The epidemics in Wuhan and South Korea were over in mid-March. In March, I submitted a paper to medRxiv, summarising all of that. At least towards the end of March, the data was there, and everybody who wanted to learn from it could.


On 17 April, Robert Redfield, director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, presented data at the coronavirus presidential briefing at the White House. And there was one plot that he presented. And I looked at it and asked why people were not jumping to their feet. Why were people not understanding what they were looking at? The plot was the data from the ILINet. For 15 years, hospitals have counted every person who shows up with an influenza-like illness – fever, coughing, whatever. There were three spikes in the 2019-2020 flu season. The first was in late December – influenza B. The next was in late January – an influenza A epidemic. And then there was one that had a peak in hospital visits around 8 March – Covid-19. For the peak to happen on that day, those patients have to go through a seven-day incubation period and then have symptoms. But they do not go to the hospital with the first symptoms. If it gets worse over three days, only then do they go to a hospital.


Four weeks later, on 8 April, the number of new infections was already down. In time for Easter, our governments should have acknowledged they were overly cautious. People would have accepted that. Two weeks’ shutdown would not have been the end of the world. We would not have what we have now – 30million people unemployed in the United States, for example. Companies do not go bankrupt over a two-week period. Two months is a very different story. If you have to pay rent for two months for a restaurant in New York with no income, you will go bankrupt. We see unemployment, we see bankruptcies, we see a lot of money wasted for economic-rescue packages – trillions of dollars in the United States. We see more deaths and illness than we would otherwise have had.


And it is going on and on and on, just because governments are afraid of admitting an error. They are trying to find excuses. They say they have to do things slowly, and that they have ‘avoided 500,000 deaths’ in the UK. But that was an absurd number that had no justification. The person presenting it pretended it was based on a model. It was not a model. It was the number of one per cent of all people infected dying. And nobody was questioning it. And that is the basic problem.


spiked: People will say that the interventions in South Korea – like contact tracing – were more effective.


Wittkowski: How many orders of magnitude, take us from 500,000 to 256, the number of deaths in South Korea? To have that kind of effect you would have to put everybody in the UK into a negative pressure room. It is totally unrealistic to even consider a reduction from 500,000 to 256.


Knut Wittkowski was talking to Fraser Myers.


Help spiked prick the Covid consensus


So here we are – 11 weeks into Britain’s three-week lockdown. We hope you are all staying sane out there, and that spiked has been of some assistance in that. We have ramped up our output of late, to provide a challenge to the Covid consensus. But we couldn’t have done that without your support. spiked – unlike so many things these days – is completely free. We rely on our loyal readers to fund our journalism. So if you enjoy our work, please do consider becoming a regular donor. Even £5 per month can be a huge help. You can donate here.Thank you! And stay well.


DONATE NOW
To enquire about republishing spiked’s content, a right to reply or to request a correction, please contact the managing editor, Viv Regan.
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 66349
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 75
Location : Wales UK

https://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

CORONAVIRUS  (COVID-19)  Empty Re: CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19)

Post  Admin on Sat 23 May 2020, 9:53 pm

Coronavirus
COVID–19: The Big Pharma players behind UK Government lockdown
Part 2 of 'Who controls the British Government response to Covid–19?'

by Vanessa Beeley
Wednesday, 6th May 2020
"To achieve world government, it is necessary to remove from the minds of men their individualism, loyalty to family tradition, national patriotism, and religious dogmas."
— Dr George Brock Chisholm, who served as the first Director-General of the World Health Organisation (WHO) from 1948 to 1953

In Part One of Who controls the British Government response to Covid–19?, I began an investigation into the individuals and entities that are, effectively, driving the UK Government response to Covid–19. In Part Two, I will expand upon the Big Pharma and Artificial Intelligence (AI) links already identified and will introduce new connections that appear to have considerable bearing upon the UK Government's Covid–19 strategy. I will expand upon the Bill Gates connections to the various organisations that are advocating global immunisation. 

The UK Government chief medical adviser and Chief Medical Officer for England, Chris Whitty, is saying that a return to “normal” in the short-term is “wholly unrealistic”. Whitty is telling us that the “highly disruptive” social distancing policy will be in place “for really quite a long period of time”. “Highly disruptive” is a euphemism for the devastation of the world economy and the horrifying knock-on effect — an estimated 50% of the world workforce are at risk of losing their livelihood.
April 16th headline in Business Insider. Chris Whitty with UK Health Secretary, Matt Hancock.
April 16th headline in Business Insider. Chris Whitty with UK Health Secretary, Matt Hancock.
The UK Government has been promoting the concept of “immunity passports” as a means of loosening the draconian lockdown measures. It is very possible that facial recognition technology may dictate who can exit lockdown and return to work. To get a passport, individuals must upload an image of their face to the app along with their ID (passport or driving licence). They are then tested to ascertain if they have had the virus and developed immunity. The app will then generate a QR code, which the employer will use to verify ID and immunity before allowing the employee back to work. 
MORE https://www.ukcolumn.org/article/covid%E2%80%9319-big-pharma-players-behind-uk-government-lockdown?fbclid=IwAR0wxJ-BWJ7rdGR0TxD6RFFQtLc1D6sU6LMZHeDH1rAv_5Phc27-MhU0kto
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 66349
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 75
Location : Wales UK

https://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

CORONAVIRUS  (COVID-19)  Empty CDC Now Says Coronavirus ‘Does Not Spread Easily’ Through Contaminated Surfaces

Post  Admin on Fri 22 May 2020, 1:11 am

https://www.faithwire.com/2020/05/21/cdc-now-says-coronavirus-does-not-spread-easily-through-contaminated-surfaces/?fbclid=IwAR29PPtC41jhmVooURArVe-7z7lxfLsWCzGvpUytTJXwi4lANXzViFjmEb4

CDC Now Says Coronavirus ‘Does Not Spread Easily’ Through Contaminated Surfaces
By Tré Goins-Phillips
Editor
3 hours ago
Experts with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention are now saying the coronavirus “does not spread easily” through touching surfaces or objects.

While that doesn’t mean it’s OK to stop cleaning things with disinfectant, it does potentially bode well as states and localities around the country begin the process of reopening following stringent lockdown measures.

On March 28, a CDC guidance stated: “It may be possible that a person can get COVID-19 by touching a surface or object that has the virus on it and then touching their own mouth, nose, or possibly their eyes.” Since then, the government organization has moved “surfaces or objects” to a list of ways in which the virus doesn’t easily spread to people.

Mississippi Church Refused to Close Amid Coronavirus Lockdowns. Then It Was Burned to the Ground.

The agency noted the virus also does not spread easily between animals to humans, or vice versa.
“COVID-19 is a new disease and we are still learning about how it spreads. It may be possible for COVID-19 to spread in other ways, but these are not thought to be the main ways the virus spreads,” the CDC stated.

It did, however, note that the main way the coronavirus spreads is via person-to-person contact, stating the infection “is spreading very easily and sustainably between people.”

The CDC, however, has argued its position hasn’t changed, because it has always stated the importance of cleaning surfaces and has likewise maintained that person-to-person contact is the main way the virus spreads.

What Is It Like to Adopt a Child In the Middle of a Pandemic?

“The fact of the matter is that just because you can detect a virus on a surface doesn’t mean it can actually infect someone,” said Dr. Jen Ashton, chief medical adviser for ABC News. “This latest CDC information is just saying that contact surface transmission [is] not the primary route by which people are getting sick. It’s still through the air via talking, coughing, laughing, singing, sneezing. That’s why those masks or face coverings may be playing such an important role in reducing the spread of this virus.”
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 66349
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 75
Location : Wales UK

https://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

CORONAVIRUS  (COVID-19)  Empty Re: CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19)

Post  Admin on Mon 18 May 2020, 4:23 pm

https://gellerreport.com/2020/05/we-could-open-up-again-and-forget-the-whole-thing.html/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=facebook
‘We could open up again and forget the whole thing,’ Dr. Knut M. Wittkowski, Chief of epidemiology and research at Rockefeller University
By Pamela Geller - on May 18, 2020
WUHAN VIRUS: CORONAVIRUS
Big Tech is shutting this expert down.

NYP: Big Tech companies are aggressively tamping down on COVID-19 “misinformation” — opinions and ideas contrary to official pronouncements.

Dr. Knut M. Wittkowski, former head of biostatistics, epidemiology and research design at Rockefeller University, says YouTube removed a video of him talking about the virus which had racked up more than 1.3 million views.

Wittkowski, 65, is a ferocious critic of the nation’s current steps to fight the coronavirus. He has derided social distancing, saying it only prolongs the virus’ existence and has attacked the current lockdown as mostly unnecessary.

Wittkowski, who holds two doctorates in computer science and medical biometry, believes the coronavirus should be allowed to achieve “herd immunity,” and that short of a vaccine the pandemic will only end after it has sufficiently spread through the population.

“With all respiratory diseases, the only thing that stops the disease is herd immunity. About 80% of the people need to have had contact with the virus, and the majority of them won’t even have recognized that they were infected,” he says in the now-deleted video.

“I was just explaining what we had,” Wittkowski told The Post of the video, saying he had no idea why it was removed. The footage was produced by the British film company Journeyman Pictures.

“They don’t tell you. They just say it violates our community standards. There’s no explanation for what those standards are or what standards it violated.”


Pamela Hall
@pakayhall
YouTube censors epidemiologist Knut Wittkowski for opposing lockdown https://nypost.com/2020/05/16/youtube-censors-epidemiologist-knut-wittkowski-for-opposing-lockdown/?utm_source=twitter_sitebuttons&utm_medium=site%20buttons&utm_campaign=site%20buttons … via @nypost


YouTube censors epidemiologist Knut Wittkowski for opposing lockdown
Big Tech companies are aggressively tamping down on COVID-19 “misinformation” — opinions and ideas contrary to official pronouncements. Dr. Knut M. Wittkowski, former head of

nypost.com
11:07 PM - May 16, 2020
Twitter Ads info and privacy
See Pamela Hall's other Tweets
‘We could open up again and forget the whole thing’

Epidemiologist Knut Wittkowski on the deadly consequences of lockdown.

By: Spiked, 15th May 2020:

Governments around the world say they are following ‘The Science’ with their draconian measures to stem the spread of the virus. But the science around Covid-19 is bitterly contested. Many experts have serious doubts about the effectiveness of the measures, and argue that our outsized fears of Covid-19 are not justified. Knut Wittkowski is one such expert who has long argued for a change of course. For 20 years, Wittkowski was the head of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Research Design at The Rockefeller University’s Center for Clinical and Translational Science. spiked spoke to him to find out

spiked: Is Covid-19 dangerous?

Knut Wittkowski: No, unless you have age-related severe comorbidities. So if you are in a nursing home because you cannot live by yourself anymore, then getting infected is dangerous.

We had the other extreme in Switzerland, which was hit pretty hard. There was one child that died. People believed that this child was born in 2011. In fact, it was born in 1911, and that was the only child that died. It was a mere coding error. Somebody with the age 108 was coded as aged eight.

spiked: How far along is the epidemic?


Wittkowski: It is over in China. It is over in South Korea. It is substantially down in most of Europe and down a bit everywhere, even in the UK. The UK and Belarus are latecomers, so you do not see exactly what you are seeing in continental Europe. But everywhere in Europe, the number of cases is substantially declining.

spiked: Have our interventions made much of an impact?

Wittkowski: When the whole thing started, there was one reason given for the lockdown and that was to prevent hospitals from becoming overloaded. There is no indication that hospitals could ever have become overloaded, irrespective of what we did. So we could open up again, and forget the whole thing.

I hope the intervention did not have too much of an impact because it most likely made the situation worse. The intervention was to ‘flatten the curve’. That means that there would be the same number of cases but spread out over a longer period of time, because otherwise the hospitals would not have enough capacity.

‘There is nothing unprecedented about the virus itself’

The United Photos of America: Summing Up Each State in One Photograph
Recommended by
spiked
Now, as we know, children and young adults do not end up in hospitals. It is only those who are both elderly and have comorbidities that do. Therefore you have to protect the elderly and the nursing homes. The ideal approach would be to simply shut the door of the nursing homes and keep the personnel and the elderly locked in for a certain amount of time, and pay the staff overtime to stay there for 24 hours per day.

How long can you do that for? For three weeks, that is possible. For 18 months, it is not. The flattening of the curve, the prolongation of the epidemic, makes it more difficult to protect the elderly, who are at risk. More of the elderly people become infected, and we have more deaths.

spiked: What are the dangers of lockdown?

Wittkowski: Firstly, we have the direct consequences: suicides, domestic violence and other social consequences leading to death. And then we have people who are too scared to go to the hospitals for other problems like strokes or heart attacks. So people stay away from hospitals because of the Covid fear. And then they die.

spiked: Were hospitals likely to be overrun?

Wittkowski: Germany had 8,000 deaths in a population of 85million. They had 20,000 to 30,000 hospitalisations. In Germany, that is nothing. It does not even show up as a blip in the hospital statistics. In Britain, the highest hospital utilisation was about 60 per cent, if I am not mistaken.

In New York City, it was a bit higher. The Javits Congress Center was turned into a field hospital with 3,000 beds. It treated just 1,000 patients in all. The Navy ship sent to New York by President Trump had 179 patients but it was sent back because it was not needed. New York is the epicenter of the epidemic in the United States, and even here at the epicenter, hospital utilisation was only up a bit. Nothing dramatic. Nothing out of the ordinary. That is what happens during the flu season. People have the flu, and then there are more patients in the hospitals than there otherwise would be.

spiked: Are we on the way to reaching herd immunity?

Wittkowski: All the studies that have been done have shown that we already have at least 25 per cent of the population who are immune. That gives us a nice cushion. If 25 per cent of the population are already immune, we are very quickly getting to the 50 per cent that we need to have what is called herd immunity. We will actually get a bit higher than that. So we have flattened what otherwise would have been a peak, and if we now let it run, even if the number of cases would increase a bit, it would not get as high as it was, because we already have enough immune people in the population. So it is not going to spread as fast as it could have spread in the beginning.

spiked: Should we worry about a second spike?

Wittkowski: This is an invention to justify a policy that politicians are afraid of reversing.

spiked: Should people practice social distancing?

Wittkowski: No.

spiked: Why not?

Wittkowski: Why? What is the justification for that? People need to ask the government for an explanation. The government is restricting freedom. You do not have to ask me for justification. There is no justification. It is the government that has to justify what it is doing. Sorry, but that is how it is.

spiked: How did we get this so wrong?

Wittkowski: Governments did not have an open discussion, including economists, biologists and epidemiologists, to hear different voices. In Britain, it was the voice of one person – Neil Ferguson – who has a history of coming up with projections that are a bit odd. The government did not convene a meeting with people who have different ideas, different projections, to discuss his projection. If it had done that, it could have seen where the fundamental flaw was in the so-called models used by Neil Ferguson. His paper was published eventually, in medRxiv. The assumption was that one per cent of all people who became infected would die. There is no justification anywhere for that.

Let us say the epidemic runs with a basic reproduction rate of around two. Eventually 80 per cent of the population will be immune, because they have been infected at some point in time. Eighty per cent of the British population would be something like 50million. One per cent of them dying is 500,000. That is where Ferguson’s number came from.

But we knew from the very beginning that neither in Wuhan nor in South Korea did one per cent of all people infected die. South Korea has 60million people. It is about the same size as the UK. How many deaths were in South Korea? Did they shut down? No. The South Korean government was extremely proud to have resisted pressure to drop the very basic concepts of democracy.

The epidemic in South Korea was over by March, the number of cases was down by 13 March. In Wuhan they also did not shut down the economy. Wuhan had restricted travel out of the city. They stopped train services and blocked the roads. They did not restrict anything social within the city until very late. We have seen, then, in Wuhan and South Korea, if you do not do anything, the epidemic is over in three weeks.

Knowing that the epidemic would be over in three weeks, and the number of people dying would be minor, just like a normal flu, the governments started shutting down in mid-March. Why? Because somebody pulled it out of his head that one per cent of all infected would die. One could argue that maybe one per cent of all cases would die. But one per cent of all people infected does not make any sense. And we had that evidence by mid-March.

spiked: Just to clarify, cases are different from people infected?

Wittkowski: Cases means people who have symptoms that are serious enough for them to go to a hospital or get treated. Most people have no symptoms at all. But waking up with a sore throat one day is not a case. A case means that someone showed up in a hospital.

spiked: The UK government was also heavily influenced by the situation in Italy. Why did that go so wrong?

Wittkowski: What we saw in Italy was that the virus was hitting those who were both old and had comorbidities, so lots of people died. But the median age of those who died in Italy was around 81 years. It is not that children or working people were dying. It was the elderly in nursing homes – not even the elderly living by themselves mostly. We saw lots of deaths and that scared people. But then, Italy did an illogical thing. It closed schools so that the schoolchildren were isolated and did not get infected and did not become immune. Instead, the virus spread almost exclusively among the old, causing more deaths and a higher utilisation of hospitals. And that is mind-boggling.

Very early on, we knew from China and we knew from South Korea that this is an epidemic that runs its course, and there was nothing special about it. But when it hit Italy, we stopped thinking about it as an age-stratified problem, and instead lumped everyone all together. The idea that if we did not shut down the schools the hospitals would have been overwhelmed does not make any sense. I frankly still cannot fully understand how our governments can be so stupid.

spiked: Governments say they are following the science. Is that really true?

Wittkowski: They have the scientists on their side that depend on government funding. One scientist in Germany just got $500million from the government, because he always says what the government wants to hear.

Scientists are in a very strange situation. They now depend on government funding, which is a trend that has developed over the past 40 years. Before that, when you were a professor at a university, you had your salary and you had your freedom. Now, the university gives you a desk and access to the library. And then you have to ask for government money and write grant applications. If you are known to criticise the government, what does that do to your chance of getting funded? It creates a huge conflict of interest. The people who are speaking out in Germany and Switzerland are all independent of government money because they are retired.

spiked: Did the Swedish scientists get it right?

Wittkowski: Sweden did the right thing. And they had to take a lot of heat for it. Now compare Sweden and the UK. The only difference is that Sweden did fine. They did have a problem. They had a relatively high number of deaths among the nursing homes.They decided to keep society open and they forgot to close nursing homes. Remarkably, the politicians acknowledged that it was a mistake to extend that open concept to nursing homes. The nursing homes should have been isolated to protect the elderly who are at high risk. But I think the Swedish government is doing well to even acknowledge that mistake.

The first death in the United States was in a nursing home in Seattle. And that was by the end of February. So everybody knew that we were expecting the same thing that we had seen in Italy – an epidemic that hits the elderly. But until just this week in New York State, the government told the nursing homes that if they did not take in patients from hospitals, they would lose their funding. So they would have to import the virus from the hospitals.

One third of all deaths in New York State were in nursing homes. One could have prevented 20,000 deaths in the United States by just isolating the nursing homes. After three or four weeks, they could have reopened and everybody would be happy.

That would have been a reasonable strategy. But shutting down schools, driving the economy against the wall – there was no reason for it. The only reason that this nonsense now goes on and on, and people are inventing things like this ‘second wave’, which is going to force us to change society and never live again, is that the politicians are afraid of admitting an error.

spiked: Is this easier to see in hindsight?

Wittkowski: What I am talking about is not hindsight. The epidemics in Wuhan and South Korea were over in mid-March. In March, I submitted a paper to medRxiv, summarising all of that. At least towards the end of March, the data was there, and everybody who wanted to learn from it could.

On 17 April, Robert Redfield, director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, presented data at the coronavirus presidential briefing at the White House. And there was one plot that he presented. And I looked at it and asked why people were not jumping to their feet. Why were people not understanding what they were looking at? The plot was the data from the ILINet. For 15 years, hospitals have counted every person who shows up with an influenza-like illness – fever, coughing, whatever. There were three spikes in the 2019-2020 flu season. The first was in late December – influenza B. The next was in late January – an influenza A epidemic. And then there was one that had a peak in hospital visits around 8 March – Covid-19. For the peak to happen on that day, those patients have to go through a seven-day incubation period and then have symptoms. But they do not go to the hospital with the first symptoms. If it gets worse over three days, only then do they go to a hospital.

Four weeks later, on 8 April, the number of new infections was already down. In time for Easter, our governments should have acknowledged they were overly cautious. People would have accepted that. Two weeks’ shutdown would not have been the end of the world. We would not have what we have now – 30million people unemployed in the United States, for example. Companies do not go bankrupt over a two-week period. Two months is a very different story. If you have to pay rent for two months for a restaurant in New York with no income, you will go bankrupt. We see unemployment, we see bankruptcies, we see a lot of money wasted for economic-rescue packages – trillions of dollars in the United States. We see more deaths and illness than we would otherwise have had.

And it is going on and on and on, just because governments are afraid of admitting an error. They are trying to find excuses. They say they have to do things slowly, and that they have ‘avoided 500,000 deaths’ in the UK. But that was an absurd number that had no justification. The person presenting it pretended it was based on a model. It was not a model. It was the number of one per cent of all people infected dying. And nobody was questioning it. And that is the basic problem.

spiked: People will say that the interventions in South Korea – like contact tracing – were more effective.

Wittkowski: How many orders of magnitude, take us from 500,000 to 256, the number of deaths in South Korea? To have that kind of effect you would have to put everybody in the UK into a negative pressure room. It is totally unrealistic to even consider a reduction from 500,000 to 256.
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 66349
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 75
Location : Wales UK

https://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

CORONAVIRUS  (COVID-19)  Empty Re: CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19)

Post  Admin on Sun 17 May 2020, 12:26 am

https://mercola.fileburst.com/PDF/ExpertInterviewTranscripts/Interview-RobertFKennedyJr-PossibleChallengesinCoronavirusVaccineDevelopment.pdf
Bobby Kennedy Jr.:
But it does bring up this other subject that you spoke of before, which is that there's this Pentagon study
from January 2020, so this year, and the Pentagon study is actually two years old. The Pentagon was
looking at, because for the interest of military readiness, the Pentagon does a lot of work with infectious
diseases. And it was trying to do experiments to see whether getting the flu shot would help against
coronavirus, and then what it found surprised them, which was actually when you get the flu shot, it
makes you more susceptible to the coronavirus. So it raised the risk of the coronavirus 36% if you had a
previous flu shot. And that study was not about coronavirus 19 but it was coronavirus. It's a red flag.
Bobby Kennedy Jr.:
That study is not alone. We've found, and I've posted these on my Instagram about, at least 10 other
studies that say, "Yeah, if you get the flu vaccine, you're much more likely to get a non-flu respiratory
viral infection." The risk goes up, on some of those studies, about 600%, and on other of those studies,
less than that, 200%, 300%, 400%. But virtually all of these studies that we found show that the flu
vaccine actually makes you more susceptible to coronavirus, and there maybe reasons for that. It's been
speculated that there maybe coronavirus contamination in the flu vaccines.
Dr. Mercola:
Actually Judy believes it's XMRV in the vaccines.
Bobby Kennedy Jr.:
Yeah. That's what I was going to say. It could be the XMRV. It could be coronavirus.
Dr. Mercola:
Yeah, could be.
Bobby Kennedy Jr.:
You're getting that paradoxical immune response because you've been inadvertently inoculated with
the coronavirus when you get the flu vaccine. So we don't know. The observed effect is very well
documented.
Dr. Mercola:
Yeah. It's very interesting correlation and sad to say. Judy believes also that the more serious nature of
the epidemic in Italy was related to the fact that they were culturing their flu vaccines with a much more
virulent strains. It had higher concentration or penetration of the XMRV, which is why they experienced
what they did. That's her contention.
Bobby Kennedy Jr.:
Yeah. I've seen a lot of anecdotal discussion of the fact that the people, the cohorts that seem to be
getting ill are by and large disproportionally cohorts who you would expect to have been vaccinated. So
senior citizens are of the highest vaccination rates for the flu are the ones who are dying. And then
medical workers... In that Northern Italy, there was a... Right before the outbreak of the virus, there was
a mass vaccination for that very, very powerful flu vaccine. And you're starting to see it now in kids in
this country, and unfortunately we are inoculating a lot of kids with flu vaccines in this country.
Bobby Kennedy Jr.:
But it's anecdotal. There's no proof of it because, of course, the CDC could look at that very easily and
they ought to. As you and I know, they never will because they don't want [inaudible 01:02:55].
Dr. Mercola:
The CDC has a private foundation that essentially is a vaccine company.
Bobby Kennedy Jr.:
Yeah. [crosstalk 01:03:04].
Bobby Kennedy Jr.:
On the board of the CDC foundation are the four big vaccine markers, Glaxo, Merck, XO, and Pfizer.
Dr. Mercola:
Yeah. And you did a brilliant exposé of them when you were on RT recently explaining the history and
the connection and how it's all self perpetuating. They're not the ostensibly public health servants that
they appear to be Bobby Kennedy Jr.:
My phone is going crazy now because people are trying to get me.
Dr. Mercola:
Okay. All right. Well, thank you for your time. I appreciate the opportunity to connect, and thanks for
everything you're doing.
Bobby Kennedy Jr.:
Oh, thank you so much for having me, and keep swinging out there. You're doing an amazing job. Thank
you.
Dr. Mercola:
All right, thanks. Bye now.
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 66349
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 75
Location : Wales UK

https://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

CORONAVIRUS  (COVID-19)  Empty Re: CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19)

Post  Admin on Fri 15 May 2020, 4:41 pm

https://israelunwired.com/94-year-old-holocaust-survivor-beats-covid-19-and-is-greeted-by-this/
94-year-old Holocaust survivor beats COVID-19 and is greeted by this
By Leah Rosenberg - May 11, 2020 2427 0
 
It seems like this Holocaust survivor has the strength to beat anything. He’s a living miracle! First surviving the Holocaust and then a vicious disease!
 
https://israelunwired.com/94-year-old-holocaust-survivor-beats-covid-19-and-is-greeted-by-this/
Boost this video to reach up to 1000 people
The 94-Year-Old Miracle
Humans of Judaism shared this amazing video from Good News Movement.
 
“94-year-old Jack Holzberg survived the Holocaust and he survived COVID-19. He was at NY Presbyterian Cornell Weil and then spent a follow up week at Care One in Whippany, NJ, where he was discharged yesterday—- they rolled out the red carpet for him!
 
 
His granddaughter Erica Wasserman tells Good News Movement, ‘he is like the Mayor because everyone loves him!’ and she said, ‘he personifies strength and grace.’ He is delighted to see his wife of 67 years, his 2 sons, 4 grandchildren, and 5 great grandchildren after weeks of being apart.”
 
Remember to Share the Good News
During this pandemic, there has been a lot of darkness. It seems that the world is sharing more bad news than good news. That is why it is so important to share the good news as well. It is important to count our blessings. We may not know this Holocaust survivor personally, but hearing about recoveries like Jack Holzberg’s revives the lost hope that so many have felt. It gives us a bit of light in all the darkness.
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 66349
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 75
Location : Wales UK

https://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

CORONAVIRUS  (COVID-19)  Empty Free Speech Is COVID’s Latest Casualty:

Post  Admin on Wed 13 May 2020, 11:48 pm

https://www.faithwire.com/2020/05/13/free-speech-is-covids-latest-casualty-doctors-silenced-protests-censored-americans-treated-like-children/?utm_source=FWNL
Free Speech Is COVID’s Latest Casualty: Doctors Silenced, Protests Censored, Americans Treated Like ‘Children’
Photo by Bethany Clarke/Getty Images
By CBN News
Contributor
6 hours ago
By Jennifer Wishon


Freedom of speech is becoming a COVID-19 casualty in America, especially in the public square of social media platforms like Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter. These privately-owned companies are freely censoring certain information.


Pro-Life Activist: GoFundMe Is Withholding Money Raised for Mothers In Urgent Need


Just look at a recent protest at Michigan’s statehouse over re-opening the state’s government. The demonstration is protected by the First Amendment, but a post encouraging people to participate was silenced by Facebook. 


The social media giant reportedly yanking it because the event didn’t urge participants to stay in their cars or wear masks as state guidelines require.
  
Another case involves a video of a press conference given by two California doctors that went viral.


After testing 5,000 patients for COVID-19, Dr. Dan Erickson and his colleague concluded California’s lockdown policies were creating more damage than the disease in their part of the state.


“Do we need to still shelter in place? Our answer is emphatically no,” Erickson said during the press briefing.


They suggested only the vulnerable should be quarantined while other Californians go back to work using guidelines like social distancing, wearing masks, and avoiding large crowds.


Their video garnered more than five million views before YouTube took it down due to content “that explicitly disputes the efficacy of local health authority recommended guidance on social distancing that may lead others to act against that guidance” according to a company statement offered to local media.
  
Dr. Erickson tells CBN News his motivation was to simply discuss the trends his office discovered.


Also, the censoring can often feel one-sided since it’s conservative viewpoints that are routinely shut down.


“Many of these social media organizations are frankly acting as if the American people are children – they are our parents who know better and they should censor what we see and write. I have a lot more faith in the American people,” Spakovsky says.


Dr. Erickson says his goal was and remains to be part of the solution of caring for patients and getting healthy Californians back to work.


“Let’s not bicker amongst each other and rip away our communication. Let’s focus on using a rational approach to get Americans working again,” he says.
  
Prager University sued YouTube for blocking a number of its viral videos. Most recently a federal appeals court in Seattle found YouTube is not a public forum subject to the First Amendment. 


I just wanted to say this is what those of us on the front lines are seeing. I know there’s guys in Washington and they’re using predictive models and that’s fine, but I said locally this is what I’m seeing,” he says.


READ: Anti-Religion Activist Wants Air Force Colonel Muzzled, Punished for ‘Horrific’, ‘Heinous’, ‘Wretched’ Public Worship


Even though platforms like YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter seem like the public squares of our day, they’re not.


“You know, nobody reads the fine print when they sign up and they don’t understand that they’re dealing with a big private company that retains control over its platform,” Hans von Spakovsky with The Heritage Foundation tells CBN News.


In other words, the freedoms Americans have to air their opinions in the real public square don’t always apply here and that’s a problem, especially when it comes to censoring information about the ever-changing pandemic.


“Apparently they’re going by what the World Health Organization is telling them. This is the same World Health Organization of which there’s now substantial evidence based on accusations that they did everything they could to minimize the threat of this virus,” Spakovsky explains.
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 66349
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 75
Location : Wales UK

https://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

CORONAVIRUS  (COVID-19)  Empty Re: CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19)

Post  Admin on Mon 11 May 2020, 7:19 pm

https://jewishnews.timesofisrael.com/tel-aviv-and-london-mayors-warn-against-return-to-business-as-usual-post-virus/
Tel Aviv and London mayors warn against return to ‘business as usual’ post virus
In doing so, they joined mayors representing 33 of the world's mega-cities, including Los Angeles, Athens, Barcelona, Seoul, Hong Kong and Buenos Aires
By MATHILDE FROT
May 11, 2020, 5:02 pm  
Tel Aviv
Tel Aviv’s Ron Huldai and London’s Sadiq Khan have joined dozens of city mayors in warning against a return to “business as usual” should the threat of Covid-19 be vanquished.

The warning was backed by the leaders of 33 of the world’s mega-cities, including Los Angeles, Athens, Barcelona, Seoul, Hong Kong and Buenos Aires.

A statement of principle signed by the group last week pledged “to build a better, more sustainable and fairer society out of the recovery from the COVID-19 crisis.”

Get The Jewish News Daily Edition by email and never miss our top storiesFREE SIGN UP
Among some of the pledges were promises to address “issues of equity that have been laid bare by the impact of the crisis”, investment in protection against future threats such as climate change, and adherence to public health and scientific expertise.

The signatories, who together represent 750 million people, are part of C40, a network of city leaders working together to combat climate change.

Former New York City Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg, board president of the C40 group, said: “This task force is committed to helping city leaders as they work on economic recovery in ways that lead us forward into the future, not back into the past.

“The principles we’ve outlined will guide our efforts to develop a new normal – one that is greener, healthier, and more prosperous for everyone.”
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 66349
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 75
Location : Wales UK

https://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

CORONAVIRUS  (COVID-19)  Empty Re: CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19)

Post  Admin on Fri 08 May 2020, 10:31 pm

The president of Tanzania didn't trust the World Health Organization, so he had fake test samples sent to labs. He took samples from papaya fruits, sheep, goats, and other things. They all came back positive for corona virus.
https://www.facebook.com/bvashram/videos/10159741721923098/

https://theplandemic.wordpress.com/?fbclid=IwAR26QqKcwBDuZcLvMFsQN8ziAr02DLo48V9SdMCadL95vlmrobtf2EhF2Cw
scrol down for section 1
SECTION 1
A TALE OF DECEIT: THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION AND THE DIAGNOSTIC TESTS



https://theplandemic.wordpress.com/?fbclid=IwAR26QqKcwBDuZcLvMFsQN8ziAr02DLo48V9SdMCadL95vlmrobtf2EhF2Cw
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 66349
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 75
Location : Wales UK

https://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

CORONAVIRUS  (COVID-19)  Empty Re: CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19)

Post  Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 1 of 3 1, 2, 3  Next

Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum