ALERT: Hillary Caught In Major New Fraud Scandal

Bill and Hillary Clinton have made at least $240 million since leaving the White House
https://www.conservativeinstitute.org/political-corruption/bill-hillary-made-millions.htm?
February 27, 2018

Bill and Hillary Clinton have made at least $240 million since leaving the White House
a katz / Shutterstock.com
It seems sex scandals and campaign losses haven’t hurt the Clintons as much as we’d like to think.

Since leaving the White House in 2001, Bill and Hillary Clinton have been the subjects of numerous federal investigations and scandals — but all that doesn’t seem to be hurting their pockets. In less than two decades since leaving Washington, the Clintons have made at least $240 million, largely from speeches and book sales.

When they moved out of the White House, the political power couple was $12 million in debt.

Talk about a comeback.

What Happened
An October report from Town and Country magazine maintained that former President Bill Clinton has earned $189 million since leaving office, while his wife, Hillary, has made nearly $51 million. Much of Hillary Clinton’s earnings reportedly come from her book sales.

In 2014, Hillary Clinton received a $14 million advance for her memoir Hard Choices, and experts believe she may have earned at least that much in advance of the release of her most recent book, What Happened, which sold more than 300,000 copies in its first week.

This has all contributed to the former secretary of state’s comfortable net worth, which was estimated by Wealth-X to be more than $18 million, though Fox Business reported in October 2017 that she had a net worth of $45 million.

According to Town and Country, Clinton’s “federal financial disclosure filing in 2015 showed that she had between $11.3 million and $52.7 million in the bank.”

His Life
Regardless of the exact figures, Hillary Clinton’s net worth still pales in comparison to that of her husband. The former president was rumored in June 2017 to have a net worth of a staggering $80 million, earning hundreds of thousands of dollars for every speech he delivers.

But speeches aren’t all that earn Bill Clinton the big bucks. His books, including his bestselling 2014 memoir, My Life, have earned him more than $38 million since he left office.

Forbes further reported:

In addition to the high-profile books and speaking gigs, [Bill Clinton has] quietly earned several million dollars offering consulting to private companies. He made $15 million advising billionaire Ron Burkle’s investment firm Yucaipa and another $24 million consulting for-profit education companies Laureate Education and GMS Education.

With an estimated combined net worth of up to $125 million, Bill and Hillary Clinton certainly aren’t hurting for money — but don’t worry: they’ll keep trying to convince the average American that they understand what it’s like to live paycheck to paycheck. As if.

Investigation into Clinton Foundation launched – and it is getting serious
February 23, 2018
https://www.conservativeinstitute.org/government-corruption/investigation-clinton-foundation-launched.htm?
Investigation into Clinton Foundation launched – and it is getting serious
JStone / Shutterstock.com
The walls are starting to close in on the Clinton family.

Now, more than one government, including the United States, is looking into the dealings of the Clinton Foundation and its possible criminal activities.

A New Investigation
In January, The Hill reported that the Justice Department had opened a new investigation into whether the Foundation engaged in any quid pro quo when Hillary Clinton served as the Secretary of State.

“The officials, who spoke only on condition of anonymity, said the probe is examining whether the Clintons promised or performed any policy favors in return for largesse to their charitable efforts or whether donors made commitments of donations in hopes of securing government outcomes,” The Hill wrote.

“The probe may also examine whether any tax-exempt assets were converted for personal or political use and whether the foundation complied with applicable tax laws, the officials said.

One witness recently interviewed by the FBI described the session to The Hill as “extremely professional and unquestionably thorough” and focused on questions about whether donors to Clinton charitable efforts received any favorable treatment from the Obama administration on a policy decision previously highlighted in media reports,” it said.

Spokesmen for Hillary Clinton and the Clinton Foundation derided the new investigation.

“Let’s call this what it is: a sham,” Hillary Clinton’s spokesman Nick Merrill said. “This is a philanthropy that does life-changing work, which Republicans have tried to turn into a political football. It began with a now long-debunked project spearheaded by Steve Bannon during the presidential campaign. It continues with Jeff Sessions doing Trump’s bidding by heeding his calls to meddle with a department that is supposed to function independently.”

“Time after time, the Clinton Foundation has been subjected to politically motivated allegations, and time after time these allegations have been proven false. None of this has made us waver in our mission to help people,” foundation spokesman Craig Minassian said. “The Clinton Foundation has demonstrably improved the lives of millions of people across America and around the world while earning top ratings from charity watchdog groups in the process.”

Some watchdog groups have given the Foundation a clean bill of health, but other investigators contend it is a pay-for-play scheme and critical part of Clinton empire.

National Review writes:
The Clintons get nothing from the foundation except free travel on chartered jets and first-class airline seats and hotel stays and, oh yes, control over a giant operating budget to steer to the charities and good causes that they prefer. Practically nothing!
The International Connection
First, multiple investigations have been launched into the Foundation because of the many indications that the organization operates primarily to benefit the Clintons. France, for instance, conducted an investigation between 2009-2011 that attempted to determine where millions of dollars of HIV/Aids assistance money (a good portion of which was given to the Clinton Foundation) was spent.

The Clinton Foundation has its tentacles in several nations, including Columbia and Haiti, and during the transition from the Obama administration to President Trump’s administration, it was reported that the new president wanted to pressure foreign governments to investigate.

“A source close to President-elect Donald Trump’s transition team told The Post that the new administration plans to pressure the US ambassadors it will name to bring up the foundation with foreign governments — and suggest they probe its ­financial dealings,” The New York Post reported.

“Haiti and Colombia will be key diplomatic posts for this ­because of all the money ­involved,” a source told The Post.
“In Haiti, recently leaked ­e-mails indicate “Friends of Bill” Clinton may have been given priority by the State Department as it prepared to spend some $10 billion in aid after a devastating earthquake hit the country in 2010. The State Department has denied any special treatment,” The Post reported.

“In Colombia, Canadian mining magnate Frank Giustra pledged $100 million to the foundation in 2005 and later benefited from the foundation’s philanthropic work in the country, where he acquired large parcels of land and set up an oil business, ­according to watchdog groups,” it said.
There are simply too many examples of corruption and the buying of favors to believe that the Clintons were merely operating a good-natured charity.
They can run but they cannot hide forever, and the noose is tightening.

MSNBC unfairly accuses Donald Trump Jr. of pushing conspiracy theories
February 22, 2018
MSNBC unfairly accuses Donald Trump Jr. of pushing conspiracy theories
Image Source: Screenshot
All too often after a national tragedy, conspiracy theories making false claims about the culprit or questioning the authenticity of the victims circulate throughout the web. It happened after the Sandy Hook school shooting when some suggested the massacre was staged; it happened again after last fall’s deadly Las Vegas shooting as a variety of false claims circulated the web.

After student David Hogg, a survivor of last week’s school shooting in Florida, was interviewed by multiple media outlets, rumors began circulating, doubting Hogg’s credibility and labeling him a “crisis actor.” MSNBC proceeded to dispel the rumors, but at the end of their segment network co-hosts contemptuously brought up President Trump and his son, Donald Jr., encouraging them to avoid hitting the “like button.”

But why? Did any Trump family member promote these conspiracies?
MSNBC to Don Jr.: Don’t Spread Fake News
Last week, 17 people died at the hands of a shooter at the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida. The horrific incident naturally garnered enormous media attention and provoked anti-gun backlash: calls for increased gun control, bans on so-called “assault rifles,” demands for mental health investments, and condemnation of the National Rifle Association (NRA) — along with any politicians who’ve received campaign funds from the NRA.

Others reacted by doubting the story — and the witnesses telling it. Theories that several of the survivors and witnesses appearing on camera are paid “crisis actors” working for the deep state quickly spread across social media.

Speaking on CNN’s Anderson Cooper on Tuesday, Hogg confirmed that he is “not a crisis actor”:

These people saying this is absolutely disturbing and I’m not an actor in any sense, way, shape or form. I was a witness to this. I am not a crisis actor. I am somebody that had to witness this and live through this and I continue to have to do that. It’s just unbelievable to me that these people are even saying this.

These admittedly far-fetched conspiracy theories prompted the mainstream media to bash the “fever swamps and extremist fringes of the internet.” And of course, networks expanded this to include the Trump family — who have done nothing to perpetuate these theories.

Case in point, MSNBC’s Ali Velshi, and Stephanie Ruhle dedicated an entire segment on their show to dismiss what Velshi explicitly calls “fake news.” For whatever reason, Velshi moves on to attack President Trump and Donald Jr. — perhaps it’s now just habit:

If Donald Trump Jr. sees this, or you know Donald Trump Jr., please tell him next time to think about hitting the ‘like’ button, undermining the credibility of children who have just experienced unimaginable horror.

Watch the video here:
NBC News

@NBCNews
Students who have called for stronger gun control measures are now the subject of conspiracy theories.@MSNBC​'s Ali Velshi and Stephanie Ruhle debunk these "crisis actor" conspiracies http://nbcnews.to/2HBRIJC

3:30 AM - Feb 22, 2018
666
461 people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy

Even late-night talk show host Jimmy Kimmel got in on the action on Wednesday, saying:
This is our president’s son doing that. Liking a story that directly defames a student that survived a shooting. People like Donald Trump Jr., the president’s least-favorite son, are perpetuating this kind of stuff.

So what are Velshi, Kimmel, and other liberals talking about?

Did Donald Trump Jr. ‘Like’ Conspiratorial Tweets?
Is the media reporting fake news again? It looks to be the case.

A simple search on Don Jr.’s Twitter account shows that he did not “like” any news story or tweet that promoted a conspiracy theory that the shooting was staged in any way or that the witnesses were actors. These are the two tweets which seem to have upset the media:

21 Feb
Andrew Anderson
@androoson
Replying to @TrumpsAlert @wamandajd
This tweet was deleted, what did it say?
The Monopoly Man - Amanda Werner
@wamandajd
pic.twitter.com/ghoqIld73P
7:54 AM - Feb 21, 2018
View image on Twitter
3
See The Monopoly Man - Amanda Werner's other Tweets
https://www.conservativeinstitute.org/media-bias/msnbc-unfairly-accuses-trump.htm?Thomas Paine
@Thomas1774Paine
VIDEO: Outspoken Trump-Hating School Shooting Survivor is Son of FBI Agent; MSM Helps Prop Up Incompetent Bureau http://bit.ly/2ojUGd8

1:17 AM - Feb 20, 2018

VIDEO: Outspoken Trump-Hating School Shooting Survivor is Son of FBI Agent; MSM Helps Prop Up...
You can cut the irony with a chainsaw it is so thick here. The Deep State media strikes again. The kid who has been running his mouth about how Donald Trump and the GOP are teaming to help murder...

truepundit.com
9,062
7,572 people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy
They do not even approach what MSNBC, CNN, and other media outlets are suggesting. What’s worse is that in the process of supposedly exposing fake news, Velshi ironically creates his own false narrative.

The first tweet, which has now been deleted, attempted to “connect the dots” by pondering if David Hogg, whose father is a former FBI agent, is “running cover for his dad” and a bureau that “botched tracking down” the suspect before the shooting. The second tweet alludes to the fact that David Hogg’s father is a former FBI agent, and the article notes that “The Deep State media strikes again.”

It isn’t fake news or a conspiracy to say that the FBI should have acted and was incompetent for failing to do so. It’s also not a conspiracy to say that the media is attempting to cover for the FBI’s incompetence by shifting the narrative from one that naturally implicates their inaction to another that focuses somehow on President Trump and his family.

The media should be ashamed of themselves for failing to inform the American public properly and engaging instead in political demagoguery. After pushing a false narrative about President Trump for over a year, they should be the last people to harp on about conspiracy theories and fake news.

Investigation into Clinton Foundation launched – and it is getting serious
February 23, 2018

Investigation into Clinton Foundation launched – and it is getting serious
JStone / Shutterstock.com
The walls are starting to close in on the Clinton family.

Now, more than one government, including the United States, is looking into the dealings of the Clinton Foundation and its possible criminal activities.

A New Investigation
In January, The Hill reported that the Justice Department had opened a new investigation into whether the Foundation engaged in any quid pro quo when Hillary Clinton served as the Secretary of State.

“The officials, who spoke only on condition of anonymity, said the probe is examining whether the Clintons promised or performed any policy favors in return for largesse to their charitable efforts or whether donors made commitments of donations in hopes of securing government outcomes,” The Hill wrote.

“The probe may also examine whether any tax-exempt assets were converted for personal or political use and whether the foundation complied with applicable tax laws, the officials said.

One witness recently interviewed by the FBI described the session to The Hill as “extremely professional and unquestionably thorough” and focused on questions about whether donors to Clinton charitable efforts received any favorable treatment from the Obama administration on a policy decision previously highlighted in media reports,” it said.

Spokesmen for Hillary Clinton and the Clinton Foundation derided the new investigation.

“Let’s call this what it is: a sham,” Hillary Clinton’s spokesman Nick Merrill said. “This is a philanthropy that does life-changing work, which Republicans have tried to turn into a political football. It began with a now long-debunked project spearheaded by Steve Bannon during the presidential campaign. It continues with Jeff Sessions doing Trump’s bidding by heeding his calls to meddle with a department that is supposed to function independently.”

“Time after time, the Clinton Foundation has been subjected to politically motivated allegations, and time after time these allegations have been proven false. None of this has made us waver in our mission to help people,” foundation spokesman Craig Minassian said. “The Clinton Foundation has demonstrably improved the lives of millions of people across America and around the world while earning top ratings from charity watchdog groups in the process.”

Some watchdog groups have given the Foundation a clean bill of health, but other investigators contend it is a pay-for-play scheme and critical part of Clinton empire.

National Review writes:

The Clintons get nothing from the foundation except free travel on chartered jets and first-class airline seats and hotel stays and, oh yes, control over a giant operating budget to steer to the charities and good causes that they prefer. Practically nothing!

The International Connection
First, multiple investigations have been launched into the Foundation because of the many indications that the organization operates primarily to benefit the Clintons. France, for instance, conducted an investigation between 2009-2011 that attempted to determine where millions of dollars of HIV/Aids assistance money (a good portion of which was given to the Clinton Foundation) was spent.

The Clinton Foundation has its tentacles in several nations, including Columbia and Haiti, and during the transition from the Obama administration to President Trump’s administration, it was reported that the new president wanted to pressure foreign governments to investigate.

“A source close to President-elect Donald Trump’s transition team told The Post that the new administration plans to pressure the US ambassadors it will name to bring up the foundation with foreign governments — and suggest they probe its ­financial dealings,” The New York Post reported.

“Haiti and Colombia will be key diplomatic posts for this ­because of all the money ­involved,” a source told The Post.

“In Haiti, recently leaked ­e-mails indicate “Friends of Bill” Clinton may have been given priority by the State Department as it prepared to spend some $10 billion in aid after a devastating earthquake hit the country in 2010. The State Department has denied any special treatment,” The Post reported.

“In Colombia, Canadian mining magnate Frank Giustra pledged $100 million to the foundation in 2005 and later benefited from the foundation’s philanthropic work in the country, where he acquired large parcels of land and set up an oil business, ­according to watchdog groups,” it said.
There are simply too many examples of corruption and the buying of favors to believe that the Clintons were merely operating a good-natured charity.
They can run but they cannot hide forever, and the noose is tightening.

Hillary Clinton openly discussed receiving election support from foreign leaders
February 17, 2018
https://www.conservativeinstitute.org/government-corruption/hillary-clinton-foreign-entities.htm?Hillary Clinton openly discussed receiving election support from foreign leaders
JStone / Shutterstock.com
For all of the talk about those who allegedly spoke to foreign governments from President Donald Trump’s campaign team, one thing has been overlooked.

There was a presidential candidate in the 2016 election that spoke to foreign governments about helping win the presidency, and that candidate’s name is Hillary Clinton.

An Admission Of Guilt.
Not only did Clinton talk to leaders of foreign governments about the United States’ presidential election, she openly admitted it.

In fact, she bragged about it and said it was a reason to vote for her.

The admission came during a Democrat Town Hall where she squared off with Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders in Columbus, Ohio on March 13, 2016, that aired on CNN.

It was there that a member of the audience named Amit Majmudar asked both candidates which one believed they had the best chance to defeat the Republican candidate for president, Donald Trump.

Majmudar, a poet who wrote a book titled “Dothead,” said that he and his family were “a little uncomfortable here, and frankly, a little bit scared,” of the Republican candidate.

What She Said.
Clinton insisted that she had the best chance, of the two Democrat candidates, to win the presidency and cited her ongoing relationship with foreign powers as the main reason.


“One argument that I am uniquely qualified to bring, because of my service as Secretary of State is what his presidency would mean to our country and our standing in the world,” she said.

“I am already receiving messages from leaders — I’m having foreign leaders ask if they can endorse me to stop Donald Trump,” she bragged.

“I mean, this is up to Americans, thank you very much, but I get what you’re saying,” she said before bragging that some, like the Italian Prime Minister, had already endorsed her publicly.

But then her answer got more sinister.

CNN host Jake Tapper asked her which foreign leaders had contacted her privately and offered to help her win the election.

She told Tapper that she would not answer that question, saying “We’re holding that in reserve too.”

Hiding from the American people a vital piece of information as to which foreign governments offered to help her win the American presidential election.

If special counsel Robert Mueller is searching for proof of collusion, there it is.

Loretta Lynch signed FISA warrant request to spy on Carter Page
February 5, 2018
https://www.conservativeinstitute.org/political-corruption/lynch-signed-fisa-request.htm?utm_source=boomtrain&utm_medium=automated&utm_campaign=CNA_20170715&utm_source=boomtrain&utm_medium=automated&utm_campaign=CNA_20170715
Loretta Lynch signed FISA warrant request to spy on Carter Page
lev radin / Shutterstock.com
Former Attorney General Loretta Lynch has recently made headlines for her likely role in helping Hillary Clinton escape prosecution for illegally using a personal computer for confidential communications. Now, it also appears that Lynch — when she was not talking with former president Bill Clinton on an Arizona tarmac — was an important factor in another area: Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant requests.

As attorney general, Lynch reportedly signed off on almost all of the Obama administration’s FISA warrant requests in 2016, including one to spy on Carter Page, who was a foreign policy adviser at one time for then-presidential candidate Donald Trump’s campaign. The warrant request for Page was based on evidence provided by the infamous Steele dossier — a dossier that was paid for by Trump’s opposition, Hillary Clinton and the DNC — and did not disclose those names to the court, according to the just-released House Intelligence memo.

Memo Provides Details
With the release of the memo, we now know that the FBI and DOJ relied heavily on the ‘unverified’ dossier, compiled by former British spy Christopher Steele and funded by the Hillary Clinton campaign and Democratic National Committee, to obtain a FISA warrant to spy on Page.

In fact, the memo reveals that Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe testified that without the Steele dossier, no FISA warrant would have been sought from the FISA Court.

The FISA application to obtain the warrant against Page, and three subsequent renewals, did not disclose the names of the political entities who funded the Steele dossier to the court, according to the memo.

And as additional evidence to corroborate Steele’s dossier, the FISA application cited a Yahoo News article — which was based on leaks from Steele himself.

The evidence suggests that key members of the Obama-era FBI and DOJ, including FBI Director James Comey, were to blame for these politically-motivated surveillance abuses against a U.S. citizen, and now Attorney General Loretta Lynch can be added to the list, as she would have signed off on the warrant request, which was submitted to the FISA Court in October 2016.

Lynch was appointed as Attorney General on April 27, 2015, and held that position until January 2017.

The FISA Court
The FISA Court is a U.S. federal court that has the legal authority to decide whether electronic surveillance on potential spies should be granted. It is composed of 11 federal judges selected by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court to serve seven-year terms.

Generally, one of the security agencies, such as the FBI, puts together the evidence needed to support the warrant request, and then the attorney general signs off on it before it is submitted to the FISA Court.

An ABC News report in March 2017 detailed the warrant application process:

More than a thousand applications for electronic surveillance, all signed by the attorney general, are submitted each year, and the vast majority are approved. From 2009 to 2015, for example, more than 10,700 applications for electronic surveillance were submitted, and only one was denied in its entirety, according to annual reports sent to Congress. Another one was denied in part, and 17 were withdrawn by the government.

In short, FISA requests are almost always granted — or at least they were during the Obama years. Critics have accused the FISA Court of essentially becoming a “rubber stamp” for government requests.

Troubling Implications
Lynch joins Comey, McCabe, lead FBI agent Peter Strzok, former acting Attorney General Sally Yates, and others on a long list of powerful government officials who appear to have worked behind the scenes to not only protect Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton, but to undermine Republican candidate Donald Trump.

Talk about “collusion” to “meddle” in an election.

https://www.usapoliticstoday.org/trey-gowdy-revealed-source/
Trey Gowdy Just REVEALED the Source of Trump Dossier – It Goes Back to Clinton!
By Gary Maher - February 7, 2018045
Rep. Trey Gowdy dropped a bombshell hint on Fox News Tuesday night. He strongly implied that the information used by former British spy Christopher Steele for false anti-Trump research was provided by longtime Clinton friend Sidney Blumenthal.

Blumenthal, a controversial figure, became central to the U.S. House investigation into the terrorist attack in Benghazi after emails showed Blumenthal consulted then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton on the false allegation that an anti-Islam YouTube video started the attack.

During his work for Clinton, he was also simultaneously employed by David Brock’s far-left organization Media Matters, earning at least $200,000 per year for his political activities. While never formally working for the Obama Administration, he worked in the White House of President Bill Clinton and for the Clinton Foundation during Obama’s tenure.

During the Fox News interview with host Martha MacCallum, Gowdy was asked whether “weeks before the election, somebody in the Obama State Department was feeding information from a foreign source to Christopher Steele.” This was after MacCallum previously asked if Gowdy knew anything about “a source who gave information to an unnamed associate of Hillary and Bill Clinton who then gave information to an unnamed official in the Obama State Department who then gave the information to Steele.”

That’s when Gowdy provided a jaw-dropping response:

“When you hear who the source, one of the sources of that information is, you’re going to think, ‘Oh, my gosh, I’ve heard that name somewhere before. Where could it possibly have been?‘”

After confirming the source was domestic, Gowdy noted, “I’m trying to think of how Secretary Clinton defined him. I think she said he was an old friend who emailed her from time to time.”

When asked directly if the source was Blumenthal, Gowdy replied, “That would be really warm. You’re warm.”

Gowdy’s comments come just a few days after the Republican memo showing how the Justice Department relied on the Clinton-funded dossier from Steele to obtain a FISA warrant against Carter Page, a former campaign adviser to Donald Trump.

It’s already looking like Hillary Clinton essentially purchased the warrant so the Obama-controlled federal government could monitor Team Trump during the heated 2016 campaign.

This is a breaking news story. We will share more details as they become available.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=6&v=10MSuZY3zh4

WATCH: What Hillary Clinton Just Said About Women and ‘Climate Change’ Has America GAGGING
https://www.usapoliticstoday.org/watch-hillary-clinton-just-said-women-climate-change-america-gagging/
By Zack Jefferson - February 6, 20180146
Hillary Clinton just can’t help herself.

She’s so far left she can’t see straight.
According to the twice-failed presidential candidate, ‘women will be primarily burdened by climate change.’
In a nutshell, “global warming” is racist.
From LifeZette:

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton predicted Monday during a human rights event at Georgetown University that climate change will force women to “bear the brunt of looking for the food, looking for the firewood, looking for the place to migrate to …”
Such migration won’t be led by men, she maintained, but rather by women “when all of the grass is finally gone as the desertification moves south and you have to keep moving your livestock or your crops are no longer growing.”

More from Daily Caller:

“So yes, women once again, will be the primary…primarily burdened with the problems of climate change.”

At this same event at Georgetown University, Clinton complained of the sexism and misogyny she believed influenced Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign.

“Some of it was old fashioned sexism and a refusal to accept the equality of women and certainly the equality of women’s leadership,” she said. “And some of it as an outgrowth of all of this anxiety and insecurity that is playing on people and leading them in a hunt for scapegoats.”
This woman is PATHETIC!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RlVlm5UxwrY
.




Breaking News: Clintons Have Been Using the FBI Against Their Enemies for Years
https://www.usapoliticstoday.org/clintons-fbi-agents-enemies-years/
By Gary Maher - February 6, 20180156
It has all the elements of a polarizing scandal, with none other than Hillary Clinton at center stage — plus highly sensitive confidential documents, unexplained actions involving the FBI, and allegations that federal investigators were weaponized for partisan political purposes.

No, this is not the infamous Christopher Steele dossier containing multiple allegations about Donald Trump’s relationships with shadowy Russian business tycoons and spies. Nor is it about the Steele dossier’s deceitful use by rogue FBI executives to put campaign operatives for the 2016 Republican presidential nominee under official surveillance.

That Hillary Clinton/FBI scandal began just last year.

The Hillary Clinton/FBI scandal described in the lead paragraph above began in 1993, only months after she and husband Bill began what turned out to be an eight-year residency in the White House. You see, Bill and Hillary Clinton’s use of the FBI for political gain is nothing new.

Here’s how the Weekly Standard summarized the Clintons’ 1993 “Filegate” scandal when it became the focus of a special counsel investigation in 1996:

The good news is that Whitewater special counsel Kenneth Starr is now looking into the circumstances under which the Clinton White House improperly secured and reviewed highly confidential background information from the FBI on more than 400 Reagan- and Bush-administration employees. A full accounting of this atrocious invasion of privacy may eventually become public.

But the bad news is that, in the meantime, the whole story is being set up to disappear. A separate FBI analysis of the “Filegate” caper has now been released. It is highly critical of the entire enterprise — which seems to have victimized 71 more individuals than had previously been identified.

But the FBI inquiry does not address the question of White House conduct. Were Clinton’s aides on a dirt-digging expedition? Those aides continue to maintain, in the president’s words, that ‘it was just an innocent bureaucratic snafu’: computer glitches and procedural carelessness, with no malign intent and no disclosure of personal information.

In short: no harm, no foul.

That’s long been the Clinton pattern — laws bent, broken or ignored, political opponents smeared, self-righteous protests of innocence when exposed, trusting supporters used and abused, and endless obfuscations, often punctuated by artless evasions, such as Hillary’s bemused response when asked by a reporter if she wiped her server clean: “What, like with a cloth or something?”

With the release Friday of the four-page “Nunes memo” — a summary of classified information obtained by the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and composed by staffers for the panel’s chairman, Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) — one paragraph in particular stands out:

The dossier — compiled by Christopher Steele (Steele dossier) on behalf of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and the Hillary Clinton campaign — formed an essential part of the Carter Page FISA application. Steele was a longtime FBI source who was paid over $160,000 by the DNC and Clinton campaign, via the law firm Perkins Coie and research firm Fusion GPS, to obtain derogatory information on Donald Trump’s ties to Russia.

The dossier, described to Congress by then-FBI Director James Comey as “salacious and unverified,” was the foundational element in the specious narrative peddled by and through the mainstream media since the day after the 2016 election to explain Donald Trump’s astounding defeat of Hillary Clinton. Yeah, that’s the ticket. Trump got his Russian buddies to help him beat Hillary!

And even though an internal FBI unit described the dossier as “minimally corroborated,” the bureau still used it to obtain and maintain a warrant for turning the massive surveillance power of the federal government against private citizens working for — who else? — Trump.

Would that surveillance have happened without the dossier? Not according to then-deputy director of the FBI, Andrew McCabe, who, according to the Nunes memo, told Congress in December 2017 during closed testimony “that no surveillance warrant would have been sought from the [FISA] without the Steele dossier information.” As Comey might say, “That’s it?”

So there we have it yet again: Bill and Hillary Clinton manipulating the administrative, investigative and intelligence powers of the Washington Establishment to benefit themselves and discredit their opponents. Reasonable people wonder if this time the Clintons will, at long last, be held to account.
Remember in 1993 when 400 FBI confidential files on Reagan and Bush appointees turned up in the White House?

Hillary Clinton Breaks Her Silence Amid FISA Memo Firestorm – Implies Trump Using FISA Memo as Scapegoat (VIDEO)
By Gary Maher - February 5, 2018040
On Monday, twice failed Presidential candidate and election rigger, Hillary Clinton spoke for the first time since the damning FISA memo was released Friday.
Hillary Clinton presented the Human Rights Award to Yazidi activist Nadia Murad on Monday at Georgetown University.

When asked about women in global politics, women’s rights and the role of female leadership in the world, Hillary Clinton implied sexism and misogyny played a role for her crushing loss of the 2016 presidential election.

We now know Hillary Clinton attempted to rig the 2016 presidential election with the help of the FBI and DOJ yet she has the nerve to complain about sexism and misogyny.

“Secretary Clinton, you talked about a backlash. How do you see this backlash against women’s rights and what can be done about it?” BBC correspondent Lyse Doucet asked Hillary.

Hillary Clinton then brought the conversation back to her experience as a presidential candidate in the 2016 election.

Not only did Crooked Hillary blame sexism and misogyny for her 2016 election loss, she subtly implied Trump is using the FISA memo as a scapegoat.

“So any of you who’ve read my book about what happened know that I think misogyny and sexism was part of that campaign. It was one of the contributing factors. Some of it was old fashioned sexism and a refusal to accept the equality of women and certainly the equality of women’s leadership and some of it as an outgrowth of all of this anxiety and insecurity that is playing on some people and leading them on a hunt for scapegoats,” Hillary said.

This woman’s arrogance is stunning.

VIDEO:
https://www.usapoliticstoday.org/hillary-clinton-amid-fisa-memo/

https://www.conservativeinstitute.org/government-corruption/donald-trump-issues-warning.htm?Donald Trump says FISA memo proves FBI and DOJ are biased against Republicans – and him
February 3, 2018

Donald Trump says FISA memo proves FBI and DOJ are biased against Republicans – and him
Joseph Sohm / Shutterstock.com
The political world was shaken on Friday when President Donald Trump authorized the public release of a classified memo compiled by House Intelligence Committee Chairman David Nunes (R-Calif.). The memo raises serious concerns about the manner in which the FBI and Department of Justice (DOJ) obtained warrants from the FISA courts. Now, President Trump is weighing in.

Trump criticized the FBI and Department of Justice on Friday for participating in what he believes was a biased political process that favored his opponent, Hillary Clinton, during the 2016 presidential election.

Politicizing Independent Agencies
Trump didn’t hide his feelings about the top-brass in the FBI and DOJ in tweets on Saturday. Hours before releasing the memo, the president criticized the politicization of the two agencies under the Obama administration.

The president tweeted:


Donald J. Trump

@realDonaldTrump
The top Leadership and Investigators of the FBI and the Justice Department have politicized the sacred investigative process in favor of Democrats and against Republicans - something which would have been unthinkable just a short time ago. Rank & File are great people!

11:33 AM - Feb 2, 2018
48,683 48,683 Replies 39,790 39,790 Retweets 134,874 134,874 likes
Twitter Ads info and privacy

Donald J. Trump

@realDonaldTrump
“You had Hillary Clinton and the Democratic Party try to hide the fact that they gave money to GPS Fusion to create a Dossier which was used by their allies in the Obama Administration to convince a Court misleadingly, by all accounts, to spy on the Trump Team.” Tom Fitton, JW

11:49 AM - Feb 2, 2018
42,748 42,748 Replies 50,885 50,885 Retweets 155,327 155,327 likes
Twitter Ads info and privacy
Of course, not everyone agreed with the memo’s release. Former FBI director and political opportunist James Comey made his displeasure known in a Saturday tweet:


James Comey

@Comey
That’s it? Dishonest and misleading memo wrecked the House intel committee, destroyed trust with Intelligence Community, damaged relationship with FISA court, and inexcusably exposed classified investigation of an American citizen. For what? DOJ & FBI must keep doing their jobs.

6:47 PM - Feb 2, 2018
42,809 42,809 Replies 81,412 81,412 Retweets 206,677 206,677 likes
Twitter Ads info and privacy
Top-Brass Corruption?
Despite Comey’s complaints, the president is well within his right to criticize the DOJ. Even without the memo, the text messages between disgraced FBI officials Peter Strzok and Lisa Page paint a damning picture of political bias against Trump in the department — not to mention Strzok’s leadership position in the Hillary Clinton email server investigation, and his participation in changing the legal standard used to exonerate the former secretary of State.

In addition to the texts from Strzok and Page, Andrew McCabe’s connection via his wife to former Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe, a close confidant of the Clintons, is in itself troubling.

Top that off with former Attorney General Loretta Lynch’s meeting with Bill Clinton on a secluded tarmac days before Comey exonerated his wife, and it begins to seem like the fix was in for Mrs. Clinton all along.

As it stands, the memo alleges that the FBI misled the court set up by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) regarding the grounds used to obtain a warrant to surveil Carter Page, President Trump’s former foreign policy adviser. The memo also claims the media was complicit in helping the FBI obtain the warrant.

While the divisive memo raises some serious questions regarding improper conduct from the FBI and DOJ under the Barack Obama administration, the underlying material that was used to compile the memo has not been released, leaving it open to skepticism from the right and left.

But if true, the allegations made by the memo are extremely vexing — and there is undoubtedly more to come.

https://www.conservativeinstitute.org/government-corruption/donald-trump-issues-warning.htm?Donald Trump says FISA memo proves FBI and DOJ are biased against Republicans – and him
February 3, 2018

Donald Trump says FISA memo proves FBI and DOJ are biased against Republicans – and him
Joseph Sohm / Shutterstock.com
The political world was shaken on Friday when President Donald Trump authorized the public release of a classified memo compiled by House Intelligence Committee Chairman David Nunes (R-Calif.). The memo raises serious concerns about the manner in which the FBI and Department of Justice (DOJ) obtained warrants from the FISA courts. Now, President Trump is weighing in.

Trump criticized the FBI and Department of Justice on Friday for participating in what he believes was a biased political process that favored his opponent, Hillary Clinton, during the 2016 presidential election.

Politicizing Independent Agencies
Trump didn’t hide his feelings about the top-brass in the FBI and DOJ in tweets on Saturday. Hours before releasing the memo, the president criticized the politicization of the two agencies under the Obama administration.

The president tweeted:


Donald J. Trump

@realDonaldTrump
The top Leadership and Investigators of the FBI and the Justice Department have politicized the sacred investigative process in favor of Democrats and against Republicans - something which would have been unthinkable just a short time ago. Rank & File are great people!

11:33 AM - Feb 2, 2018
48,683 48,683 Replies 39,790 39,790 Retweets 134,874 134,874 likes
Twitter Ads info and privacy

Donald J. Trump

@realDonaldTrump
“You had Hillary Clinton and the Democratic Party try to hide the fact that they gave money to GPS Fusion to create a Dossier which was used by their allies in the Obama Administration to convince a Court misleadingly, by all accounts, to spy on the Trump Team.” Tom Fitton, JW

11:49 AM - Feb 2, 2018
42,748 42,748 Replies 50,885 50,885 Retweets 155,327 155,327 likes
Twitter Ads info and privacy
Of course, not everyone agreed with the memo’s release. Former FBI director and political opportunist James Comey made his displeasure known in a Saturday tweet:


James Comey

@Comey
That’s it? Dishonest and misleading memo wrecked the House intel committee, destroyed trust with Intelligence Community, damaged relationship with FISA court, and inexcusably exposed classified investigation of an American citizen. For what? DOJ & FBI must keep doing their jobs.

6:47 PM - Feb 2, 2018
42,809 42,809 Replies 81,412 81,412 Retweets 206,677 206,677 likes
Twitter Ads info and privacy
Top-Brass Corruption?
Despite Comey’s complaints, the president is well within his right to criticize the DOJ. Even without the memo, the text messages between disgraced FBI officials Peter Strzok and Lisa Page paint a damning picture of political bias against Trump in the department — not to mention Strzok’s leadership position in the Hillary Clinton email server investigation, and his participation in changing the legal standard used to exonerate the former secretary of State.

In addition to the texts from Strzok and Page, Andrew McCabe’s connection via his wife to former Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe, a close confidant of the Clintons, is in itself troubling.

Top that off with former Attorney General Loretta Lynch’s meeting with Bill Clinton on a secluded tarmac days before Comey exonerated his wife, and it begins to seem like the fix was in for Mrs. Clinton all along.

As it stands, the memo alleges that the FBI misled the court set up by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) regarding the grounds used to obtain a warrant to surveil Carter Page, President Trump’s former foreign policy adviser. The memo also claims the media was complicit in helping the FBI obtain the warrant.

While the divisive memo raises some serious questions regarding improper conduct from the FBI and DOJ under the Barack Obama administration, the underlying material that was used to compile the memo has not been released, leaving it open to skepticism from the right and left.

But if true, the allegations made by the memo are extremely vexing — and there is undoubtedly more to come.

ALERT: Clinton Foundation Makes Sick Announcement – Shut It Down!

October 16, 2017 Frank Spear
The Clinton Foundation is known for their shady practices. The latest accusations levied against them stems from an incident involving big-time Hollywood film producer Harvey Weinstein.

According to The New York Times, Weinstein was paying off people that he was sexually harassing for decades. It was not until recently that he was caught. Weinstein is known for being one of the most prominent Democratic donors out there, and he has donated to the Clinton Foundation. Hillary Clinton finally announced, a week after he was caught, that she was disgusted by his crimes. She then went on to say that she was going to keep all of his donation money, about $250,000, according to Fox News.

The Clinton Foundation announced Sunday that they would not be able to return all of the money anyway because there was a good chunk of it already spent on other projects.

Craig Minassian, a spokesman for the Clinton Foundation, made it clear that an announcement about returning the money was right around the corner. Many people began to see the direction this was going in when Minassian took to Twitter.

“Suggesting @ClintonFdn return funds from our 330,000+ donors ignores the fact that donations have been used to help people across the world,” Minassian’s tweet read.

The call for Clinton to return the money came after the bombshell about Weinstein’s sexual predator behavior came to light. Around 30 women have come forward to admit that they were sexually harassed and/or raped by Weinstein.

Some of the names coming out are huge, and this obviously is drawing a ton of attention. People like Angelina Jolie, Gwyneth Paltrow, and Rose McGowan came forward to talk about their horrific incidents with Weinstein.

Now, Democrats are scrambling to do something with the donor money they received from Weinstein. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, Sen. Elizabeth Warren, and Sen. Al Franken — just to name a few — have vowed to donate the money given to them by Weinstein to charities.

It took Clinton a total of five days to come out and say anything about the incident, despite her reputation among the Left as a champion of women’s rights. Hillary gave a speech wherein she claimed to be “shocked and appalled” by Weinstein’s behavior.

During the 2016 election, Weinstein donated over $46,000 to Clinton’s campaign. This is not including private donations to The Clinton Foundation.

Hillary Clinton announced she is going to keep the money Harvey Weinstein donated to her foundation. Should she return it?

POLL: Should Hillary Donate The Money She Received From Weinstein?

Yes
No
Next
Clinton appeared on CNN and stated, “What other people are saying, what my former colleagues are saying, is they’re going to donate it to charity, and of course I will do that.”

“I give 10% of my income to charity every year, this will be part of that. There’s no – there’s no doubt about it.” Yet, there is no arguing that, after being so close to Weinstein, it is hard to believe that she didn’t have some knowledge of what was going on behind closed doors. It is safe to say that most people are done taking their moral advice from people in Hollywood

NEWS ALERT: Hillary Collapses…
October 17, 2017 Luis Miguel
https://www.christiannewsalerts.com/news-alert-hillary-collapses/?
Hillary Clinton has regularly been the subject of suspicions regarding her health. During the 2016 presidential election, many of Clinton’s detractors used her perceived health issues to argue that she was physically unfit for office.

Now the former Secretary of State is again prompting talk about her health. According to The Daily Mail, Clinton appeared on the BBC’s Graham Norton Show Monday wearing a surgical boot, which she attributed to a broken toe suffered after falling down a flight of stairs.

Clinton’s mishap occurred, she said, as she walked in heels carrying a cup of coffee. The fall caused her to miss appearances on several British shows, including ITV’s This Morning and Woman’s Hour on Radio 4.

The two-time presidential candidate, who was in the UK to promote her new book, What Happened, described her accident: “I was running down the stairs in heels with a cup of coffee in hand, I was talking over my shoulder and my heel caught and I fell backwards.”

“I tried to get up and it really hurt,” she continued. “I’ve broken my toe.” Clinton then went on to praise Britain’s health care system. “I’ve received excellent care from your excellent health service.”

Clinton, who turns 70 this month, had an X-ray done revealing her broken toe prior to appearing on Graham Norton’s popular celebrity talk show. The other British hosts lamented the loss of their much-anticipated guest.

Jane Garvey of Woman’s House apologized to her fans for the cancellation of her Clinton interview: “We’re working very, very hard to get this interview rescheduled and Hillary Clinton is very apologetic….so what can I say? That’s the situation.”

She later said, “I’d read the book and everything. Apologies.” Likewise, This Morning‘s Philip Schofield told his audience “Supposed to be interviewing Hillary Clinton… but she’s fallen over and hurt her foot!! Gutted.”

Interestingly, President Trump took a jab at Clinton Monday morning, writing on Twitter: “I was recently asked if Crooked Hillary Clinton is going to run in 2020? My answer was, ‘I hope so!'” Trump’s famous “Crooked Hillary” moniker has often been seen as an allusion to the ethics issues surrounding the former Secretary of State. However, some have interpreted the nickname as suggestive of Clinton’s supposed health issues.

The Democrat icon has publicly fallen on numerous occasions. Most prominently, Clinton appeared to suffer a fainting spell during a 9/11 ceremony last year, The Daily Beast reported. She was seen slumping, falling over, and eventually helped into a vehicle. One witness, a senior law enforcement official, said: “They threw her in like she was a side of beef.”

Hillary Clinton has had a slew of health issues. Is she fit for any kind of public office if she chooses to stay in politics?

POLL: Would President Trump Beat Hillary In The 2020 Election If She Ran Again?

Yes
No
Next
According to the Clinton campaign, the former Secretary of State had been diagnosed with pneumonia and suffered the effects of dehydration. In another famous case, Clinton tripped while boarding a plane during a State Department trip to Yemen.

The footage was later edited into a gif, which President Trump shared on Twitter. While Democrats censured Trump’s retweet, his supporters saw it as a humorous take on Clinton’s penchant for falling.

Whether Clinton’s instability is due to a health issue, fatigue or incidental, the former Secretary of State does, indeed, suffer some very public and unfortunate health events. These events necessarily result in questions.

ALERT: Hillary Caught In Major New Fraud Scandal
August 15, 2017 Benjamin Welton
https://www.christiannewsalerts.com/hillary-in-major-new-fraud-scandal/?utm_medium=push&utm_source=AP&utm_campaign=onesignal
The more the American public sees Hillary Clinton and her coalition, the more they breathe a sigh of relief that Donald Trump was elected in 2016. Even the pastors in Clinton’s camp seem infected with lying tongue.

The Reverend Matthew Deuel of Winona Lake, Indiana’s Mission Point Community Church told CNN that Reverend Bill Shillady’s new book contains plagiarism. Rev. Shillady, who worked for Clinton’s campaign in 2016, apparently stole words from Deuel’s blog and put them in his forthcoming book Strong For a Moment Like This, according to Newsmax.

Here’s the evidence: In Deuel’s blog post, which was originally published in March of 2016, the Reverend wrote: “For the disciples and Christ followers in the first century, Good Friday represented the day that everything fell apart. All was lost. The momentum and hope of a man, claiming to be the Son of God, the Messiah who was supposed to change everything, had been executed.”

Rev. Shillady’s email submission to Clinton, which was published by CNN, contains the following lines: “For the disciples and Christ’s followers in the first century, Good Friday represented the day that everything fell apart. All was lost. The momentum and hope of a man claiming to be the Son of God, the Messiah who was supposed to change everything, had been executed.”

In the same blog post, Deuel wrote: “Death will be shattered. Hope will be restored. Redemption is coming. But first, we must live through the darkness and seeming hopelessness of Friday.”

Rev. Shillady’s email says: “Death will be shattered. Hope will be restored. But first, we must live through the darkness and seeming hopelessness of Friday.”

Rev. Deuel claims that Rev. Shillady never contacted him, nor cited his blog in his email submissions. If that is the case, then Rev. Shillady is definitely guilty of plagiarism.

Rev. Dr. Bill Shillady has known Clinton for 15 years. According to him, Clinton received the Good Word every day on the campaign trail and imbued her political message with the lessons that she received from the United Methodist church and its traditions.

A fluff piece published by Philly.com claims that Rev. Shillady is not only a large influence on Clinton but that her “deep-seated” faith helped her get through her defeat in November.

Article writer Kristin E. Holmes mused that Clinton could become a Protestant preacher.

All of these gushing articles about Clinton’s faith seem to overlook her unsavory history. On election night, Clinton apparently got drunk and shouted obscenities at everyone around her. The word “meltdown” has been used to describe this particular incident.

During the campaign itself, Mrs. Clinton did not heed Jesus’ warning in the Book of Matthew (“Judge not, that ye not be judged”) when she characterized Trump’s supporters as a “Basket of deplorables.”

Clinton’s supposed Christian faith also did not stop her from saying in 2015: “Deep-seated cultural codes, religious beliefs, and structural biases have to be changed.” This was directed at Christians who do not support the state-sponsored murder of the unborn.

Clinton’s Christian faith also did not preclude an alliance with George Soros, a financier who consistently supports anti-Christian causes throughout the world, and Saudi Arabia, a Sunni Muslim country that does not take in Christian refugees and does not let Christians build churches or outwardly celebrate their religion.

Hillary Clinton does not seem to take her Christianity very seriously, and Rev. Shillady seems to have a problem with the truth.