Who is online?
In total there are 27 users online :: 1 Registered, 0 Hidden and 26 Guests :: 1 BotAdmin
Most users ever online was 386 on Sun 25 Apr 2021, 2:56 pm
Latest topics
RIOTING UK
RIOTING UK
London Riots: Symptom of a deeper malaise.
The rioters are unlikely to have been taught to take responsibility for their actions or to respect authority. They do not mind if they destroy their own communities because they have little to lose. They will have been in schools which lacked discipline and where they learnt that they can behave how they like with few consequences for their actions.
Read more here
http://www.christianconcern.com/blog/london-riots-symptom-of-a-deeper-malaise
The Guardian:
Amelia Gentleman Wednesday 10 August 2011
"Why aren't the parents calling up their children and saying, 'Come back here at once'? They can't. Those days are gone, that authority has gone. A lot of parents are not able to stop their child from going out.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/aug/10/uk-riots-liberal-right-parent
More From
The Guardian
By Philip Johnston
09 Aug 2011
When rioters rampaged through the suburbs of Paris six years ago, Nicolas Sarkozy, then France’s interior minister, called them racaille. While this can mean “rabble” or “riff-raff”, it also translates as “scum”.
You cannot imagine a British politician using that term to describe the youths who have turned London into a war zone. Yet it is the word that will have been on the lips of all decent people as they watched – appalled, shocked and ashamed – while the capital and, later, other cities were trashed by elements of their criminally inclined underclass. Epithets like “rabble” or “riff-raff” are too mild for the lawless, feckless, mindless and amoral thugs who forced passers-by to strip naked while they stole their clothes; or who torched a furniture warehouse that had withstood the Blitz; or who ransacked shops across London. What else do you call them?
For this, we have to thank four decades of politically correct policing, and a gradual breakdown of the informal network of authority figures that once provided an additional element of control over the bad behaviour of young people. Adults are now reluctant, or too scared, to step in and stop things getting out of hand, or to impose a wider moral code – and in any case, they are no longer listened to. Deference to age and authority has been eroded by years of genuflection to the twin gods of multiculturalism and community cohesion.
The police, bludgeoned by criticism for the way they handled the Brixton riots 30 years ago and the Stephen Lawrence murder in 1994, have become more like social workers than upholders of law and order.
Part of the problem is that the breakdown of the family (or an unwillingness to form one) has left a generation of feral adolescents without fathers or any adult males to act as role models. Parents rarely know what their children are doing, and exercise little power or authority over them. Instead, their loyalty is to the gang and to its codes, rather than to the prevailing moral orthodoxies of the majority of the population.
These young people know that if they are caught committing an offence, they are unlikely to be punished, or certainly not as severely as was once the case. If Britain today jailed the same ratio of people relative to the number of the most serious offences – burglary, robbery and violence – as it did in 1954, there would not be 80,000 behind bars, but 300,000. It may well be true, as penal reformers maintain, that there are some people in jail who ought not to be; but by the same token, there are an awful lot who should be who aren’t.
Another big change is the official attitude to crimes against property: they are no longer considered important. Burglaries have a pitifully low clear-up rate. Under the fixed-penalty notice system for shoplifting introduced by the last government, the police are expected to levy a fine of £80 if the items stolen cost less than £200. There was a time when theft was regarded as a serious crime, and it still carries a maximum jail term of seven years on indictment. Yet thieves are now being treated in the same way as motorists whose cars have remained too long in a parking space.
The industrial-scale looting and recreational rioting that have taken place around London are the ultimate expression of this lax attitude.
The rioters are unlikely to have been taught to take responsibility for their actions or to respect authority. They do not mind if they destroy their own communities because they have little to lose. They will have been in schools which lacked discipline and where they learnt that they can behave how they like with few consequences for their actions.
Read more here
http://www.christianconcern.com/blog/london-riots-symptom-of-a-deeper-malaise
The Guardian:
Amelia Gentleman Wednesday 10 August 2011
"Why aren't the parents calling up their children and saying, 'Come back here at once'? They can't. Those days are gone, that authority has gone. A lot of parents are not able to stop their child from going out.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/aug/10/uk-riots-liberal-right-parent
More From
The Guardian
By Philip Johnston
09 Aug 2011
When rioters rampaged through the suburbs of Paris six years ago, Nicolas Sarkozy, then France’s interior minister, called them racaille. While this can mean “rabble” or “riff-raff”, it also translates as “scum”.
You cannot imagine a British politician using that term to describe the youths who have turned London into a war zone. Yet it is the word that will have been on the lips of all decent people as they watched – appalled, shocked and ashamed – while the capital and, later, other cities were trashed by elements of their criminally inclined underclass. Epithets like “rabble” or “riff-raff” are too mild for the lawless, feckless, mindless and amoral thugs who forced passers-by to strip naked while they stole their clothes; or who torched a furniture warehouse that had withstood the Blitz; or who ransacked shops across London. What else do you call them?
For this, we have to thank four decades of politically correct policing, and a gradual breakdown of the informal network of authority figures that once provided an additional element of control over the bad behaviour of young people. Adults are now reluctant, or too scared, to step in and stop things getting out of hand, or to impose a wider moral code – and in any case, they are no longer listened to. Deference to age and authority has been eroded by years of genuflection to the twin gods of multiculturalism and community cohesion.
The police, bludgeoned by criticism for the way they handled the Brixton riots 30 years ago and the Stephen Lawrence murder in 1994, have become more like social workers than upholders of law and order.
Part of the problem is that the breakdown of the family (or an unwillingness to form one) has left a generation of feral adolescents without fathers or any adult males to act as role models. Parents rarely know what their children are doing, and exercise little power or authority over them. Instead, their loyalty is to the gang and to its codes, rather than to the prevailing moral orthodoxies of the majority of the population.
These young people know that if they are caught committing an offence, they are unlikely to be punished, or certainly not as severely as was once the case. If Britain today jailed the same ratio of people relative to the number of the most serious offences – burglary, robbery and violence – as it did in 1954, there would not be 80,000 behind bars, but 300,000. It may well be true, as penal reformers maintain, that there are some people in jail who ought not to be; but by the same token, there are an awful lot who should be who aren’t.
Another big change is the official attitude to crimes against property: they are no longer considered important. Burglaries have a pitifully low clear-up rate. Under the fixed-penalty notice system for shoplifting introduced by the last government, the police are expected to levy a fine of £80 if the items stolen cost less than £200. There was a time when theft was regarded as a serious crime, and it still carries a maximum jail term of seven years on indictment. Yet thieves are now being treated in the same way as motorists whose cars have remained too long in a parking space.
The industrial-scale looting and recreational rioting that have taken place around London are the ultimate expression of this lax attitude.
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Today at 8:42 pm by Admin
» THE BLAZE
Today at 8:19 pm by Admin
» BIBLE STUDY on VERSE
Today at 6:59 pm by Admin
» PROPHESY NEWS WATCH
Today at 6:52 pm by Admin
» JIHAD WATCH
Yesterday at 11:39 pm by Admin
» NUGGET Today's Devotional
Yesterday at 11:35 pm by Admin
» VERY IMPORTANT CHRISTIAN CONCERN
Yesterday at 10:51 pm by Admin
» Chip Brogden CHURCH WITHOUT WALLS
Yesterday at 10:37 pm by Admin
» The Holocaust and Faith
Yesterday at 10:26 pm by Admin
» ISRAEL BREAKING NEWS
Yesterday at 10:21 pm by Admin
» AISH Honest Reporting
Yesterday at 9:52 pm by Admin
» israelAM
Yesterday at 9:43 pm by Admin
» ZAKA Tel Aviv
Yesterday at 9:35 pm by Admin
» HONEST REPORTING Defending Israel from Media Bias plz read REGULAR UPDATES
Yesterday at 7:01 pm by Admin
» KEITH NOTES FROM NANJING
Sun 05 May 2024, 10:07 pm by Admin
» PULSE OF ISRAEL
Sun 05 May 2024, 9:38 pm by Admin
» Israel 365 News
Sun 05 May 2024, 8:06 pm by Admin
» AISH
Sun 05 May 2024, 6:50 pm by Admin
» FRANCIS FRANGIPANE MINISTRIES
Fri 03 May 2024, 11:13 pm by Admin
» Gatestone Institute
Fri 03 May 2024, 9:56 pm by Admin