“PERSECUTED FOR LOVING BRITAIN”

Admin Wed 17 Aug 2016, 10:11 pm

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/britain-first-luton-ban_uk_57b325f2e4b08e6ad8744227
Britain First’s Angry Response To Bedfordshire Police High Court Ruling That Could ‘Finish Them’
“In a way, we are flattered...”
16/08/2016 16:51
290
Chris York Senior Editor, Huffington Post UK
Britain First’s leadership have responded angrily to the High Court ruling that has barred them from the town of Luton for three years and could potentially bankrupt the group.
Leader Paul Golding called the decision anti-democratic, but bragged the decision by Bedfordshire Police to seek the injunction meant authorities were worried by Britain First and considered them a threat.
Golding and deputy leader Jayda Fransen are also barred from all mosques in England and Wales for the same period.
BARCROFT MEDIA VIA GETTY IMAGES
Deputy leader: Jayda Fransen joins British First group protest march at Bury Park on June 27, 2015 in Luton.
Golding, 34, told IBTimes UK: “People who care about democracy should be screaming from the rooftops about this, because a legal political party has been banned from a town centre.
“When has a British police force been this aggressive?
“In a way, we are flattered that the state is spending so much time and money to ban us...they consider us to be worrying.”
Golding had previously stated that legal costs of losing the case could run to “between £50,000 and £100,000”.
The result could spell the end of the group, with Golding explaining in a video message in July that it risked being “bled dry with endless court appearances and injunctions that simply make it impossible for Britain First to continue operating”.
BARCROFT MEDIA VIA GETTY IMAGES
Paul Golding and fellow Britain First activists in Luton in June 2015.
Britain First rely on donations for funding their legal costs and a recent event highly publicised by the group only managed to raise £800 meaning the group are facing financial ruin.
“If we lose this court hearing, as we are dealing with the highest court in the land, the ruling will bind all other courts. Thus, if we lose it becomes ridiculously easy for other police forces to obtain injunctions,” Golding said.
“As this is the High Court in London we simply have to win. If we lose, not only will we face an avalanche of other injunctions being sought but we will probably be liable for the costs of the other side which will run into the tens of thousands of pounds. This is literally all or nothing.
“If we do not win we are finished and I mean that with all seriousness,” Golding concluded.
The group has stayed silent on the issue across their social media but do appear to have addressed it in their newspaper which ran the headline “PERSECUTED FOR LOVING BRITAIN”.

In a statement, Assistant Chief Constable Mike Colbourne told The Huffington Post UK: “Applying for such an order is not a decision we take lightly, however we decided to take action following a number of incidents where these parties came into areas of Luton and caused community tensions.
“Luton is an incredibly diverse and vibrant town and we will not tolerate any individual who seeks to cause disharmony or provoke tensions within our communities.
“I would like to be clear that we would never seek to ban demonstrations or peaceful protest, however we have a duty to protect our communities and will always act in their best interests.”
The ruling extends an interim civil injunction against Golding, and deputy, Jayda Fransen, and forbids them from:
(a) Entering any Mosque or Islamic Cultural Centre or its private grounds within England and Wales without prior written invitation.
(b) Being within a designated exclusion zone in the Bury Park area save unless that person remains at all times within a railway carriage travelling along the railroad adjoining Luton railway station.
(c) Causing, permitting, encouraging or inciting any person to enter or remain in designated exclusion zone in the Bury Park area save unless that person remains at all times within a railway carriage travelling along the railroad adjoining Luton railway station.
(d) Publishing, broadcasting, distributing or displaying, or causing or encouraging to be published, broadcast, distributed or displayed, any images or films showing any person or event, on a date after the making of this order, within designated exclusion zones in the Bury Park and Town Centre areas.
(e) Entering a designated exclusion zone in the Town Centre area save in accordance with paragraph 1 (g) below.
(f) Causing, permitting, encouraging or inciting any person to enter or remain in the designated exclusion zone in the Town Centre area save in accordance with paragraph 1 (g) below.
(g) The Respondents are permitted to enter a designated area in the Town Centre for the purposes of, and only for the purposes of, attending hearings at Luton Magistrates Court and Luton Crown Court at which they are required to attend as defendants in criminal proceedings. They are also permitted to instruct legal representatives to attend such hearings. The Respondents must give the Chief Constable of Bedfordshire Police advanced written notice of all such attendances by 5pm on the working day before the relevant hearing.
In January, Golding and his deputy, Jayda Fransen, led a small contingent of activists through Luton handing out newspapers and confronting local Muslims in what anti-extremist charity Tell Mama said was an “intimidating” fashion aimed at “inflaming” tensions.
Golding was later arrested, charged and fined £450 for “wearing a uniform with political objectives” under the Public Order Act 1936, a law originally enacted to tackle Oswald Mosley’s British Union of Fascists, also known as the ‘Blackshirts’.
Fransen, 30, was also arrested and charged with religiously aggravated harassment over the incident, a separate case that is still ongoing.