Shocking 1995 Video Surfaces Of Obama Revealing Who He REALLY Is

https://www.usapoliticstoday.org/obama-broke-78-laws-list/
Obama Broke 78 Laws As President… Here’s The List
By Gary Maher - January 23, 2018027994
The list is might long, and is a striking record of Obama’s real legacy — the one the media pundits and Democrats will not tell you about:

1) Illegally armed Mexican drug cartels and ISIS militants

In Operation Fast and Furious, the Obama administration facilitated the sale of thousands of guns to Mexican drug cartels and stopped tracking those weapons once they crossed the border so the administration could later blame the Second Amendment.

“The Department of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives apparently ordered one of its own agents to purchase firearms with taxpayer money, and sell them directly to a Mexican drug cartel,” the New York Post reported. “Let that sink in: After months of pretending that ‘Fast and Furious’ was a botched surveillance operation of illegal gun-running spearheaded by the ATF and the US attorney’s office in Phoenix, it turns out that the government itself was selling guns to the bad guys.”

Even more shocking, President Obama authorized a shipment of guns to the Syrian opposition, a.k.a. ISIS-linked militants, on the exact same day he demanded more gun control in response to the Oregon shooting.

“…The President also emphasized to his team that the U.S. would continue to support the Syrian opposition as Russia enters the war-torn country,” CNN reported in October.

But virtually all of the rebels in Syria have pledged allegiance to the Islamic State since at least 2013.

“The Free Syrian Army and the Syrian National Council, the vaunted bulwarks of the moderate opposition, only really exist in hotel lobbies and the minds of Western diplomats,” Journalist Ben Reynolds wrote in November. “There is simply no real separation between ‘moderate’ rebel groups and hardline Salafists allied with al-Qaeda.”

2) Attempting to shut down gun stores outside of law

In a classic case of criminal racketeering, the U.S. Department of Justice was pressuring banks to refuse service to gun stores in a program entitled Operation Choke Point.

Under the program started in 2014 if not before, the DOJ was attempting to shut down legal gun dealers by coercing financial institutions to close the bank and merchant accounts associated with their businesses.

In 2012, Bank of America told a gun company, McMillan Group International, that because the company was expanding into firearms manufacturing, the bank no longer wanted McMillan’s business.

“We have to assess the risk of doing business with a firearms-related industry,” the bank’s representative told operations director Kelly McMillan.

And not long after, BitPay, a U.S.-based bitcoin processor, likewise refused to do business with gun dealer Michael Cargill of Central Texas Gunworks due to a similar policy.

3) Spent tax dollars to re-settle illegals inside U.S.

U.S. Customs and Border Patrol has been purchasing bus tickets and vouchers for illegal immigrants in order to ship them deeper into the country at taxpayers’ expense, according to a McAllen, Texas city official.

“They’re not bringing them here, they’re bringing them to our bus terminals because that’s where the Border Patrol understands that they have transportation to go to the interior,” McAllen, Texas City Attorney Kevin Pagan said in an interview with Infowars. “So they’re dropping them off and it’s our understanding that they were dropped off with tickets or with vouchers for tickets, but it turns out that some of them tonight didn’t have their tickets or their vouchers for tickets, or like I said their buses are tomorrow, so they have no where to stay.”

Several months earlier, Obama ordered the Border Patrol to stand down from protecting the border and enforcing immigration laws.

“We are simply being ordered to stand down and stop tracking and trying to apprehend the criminals,” Shawn Moran, Vice President of the National Border Patrol Council, told Breitbart.

4) Using executive action to restrict Second Amendment

Obama decided to use his “pen and his phone” to enact gun control without Congressional approval.

“Without a Democratic majority in Congress, and faced with a GOP that is firmly against any form of gun control measures, Obama has repeatedly warned that he would act on his own,” Zero Hedge reported.

For one thing, Obama is attempting to require private sellers to conduct background checks.

“The action, officials explained, would include guidance on how the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives will now determine who is “engaged in the business” of selling firearms under federal law and, therefore, who is required to obtain a license to sell firearms,” the Washington Free Beacon reported.

Obama may also try and prevent people on the no-fly list from being able to purchase guns, which violates the Fifth Amendment’s guarantee of due process by allowing the government to deprive people of their rights based only on suspicion.

Additionally, numerous law-abiding Americans have been wrongly placed on the No-Fly list due to false information, clerical errors or political persecution.

“The U.S. government maintains a massive watchlist system that risks stigmatizing hundreds of thousands of people – including U.S. citizens – as terrorism suspects based on vague, overbroad, and often secret standards and evidence,” the ACLU reported. “The consequences of being placed on a government watchlist can be far-reaching; they can include questioning, harassment, or detention by authorities, or even an indefinite ban on air travel.”

5) Illegally targeted conservative groups via IRS

Obama’s IRS had illegally targeted conservative groups for additional “reviews” of their tax status applications.

Organizations with the phrases “tea party” or “patriot” in their names were singled out for harassment, such as requiring them to provide information about their family members, their social media posts and a list of donors.

Obama had met with a key IRS official who was involved in the targeting just two days before the key official told his colleagues how to target conservative groups. The Daily Caller reported:

The Obama appointee implicated in congressional testimony in the IRS targeting scandal met with President Obama in the White House two days before offering his colleagues a new set of advice on how to scrutinize tea party and conservative groups applying for tax-exempt status.

IRS chief counsel William Wilkins, who was named in House Oversight testimony by retiring IRS agent Carter Hull as one of his supervisors in the improper targeting of conservative groups, met with Obama in the Roosevelt Room of the White House on April 23, 2012. Wilkins’ boss, then-IRS commissioner Douglas Shulman, visited the Eisenhower Executive Office Building on April 24, 2012, according to White House visitor logs.

On April 25, 2012, Wilkins’ office sent the exempt organizations determinations unit “additional comments on the draft guidance” for approving or denying tea party tax-exempt applications, according to the IRS inspector general’s report.

During Obama’s first four years as President, IRS commissioner Douglas Shulman made 157 visits to the White House.

“This is more visits to the White House – by a very large margin – than any other cabinet member during Obama’s first term,” Journalist Tim Brown revealed. “By comparison, during the four years that Mark Everson was IRS commissioner when Bush was president, Everson made only one visit to the White House.”

6) Secretly obtained phone records from Associated Press journalists

In May 2013, Associated Press reported:

“The Justice Department secretly obtained two months of telephone records of reporters and editors for The Associated Press in what the news cooperative’s top executive called a “massive and unprecedented intrusion” into how news organizations gather the news.

The records obtained by the Justice Department listed outgoing calls for the work and personal phone numbers of individual reporters, general AP office numbers in New York, Washington and Hartford, Conn., and the main number for AP reporters in the House of Representatives press gallery, according to attorneys for the AP. It was not clear if the records also included incoming calls or the duration of calls.

Like this:

Flashback: Bill Clinton and Barack Obama slam illegal immigration in State of the Union speeches
February 1, 2018
https://www.conservativeinstitute.org/national-sovereignty/illegal-immigration/flashback-state-of-union.htm?utm_source=boomtrain&utm_medium=NS1&utm_campaign=1517517273693&utm_source=boomtrain&utm_medium=NS1&utm_campaign=1517517273591
Flashback: Bill Clinton and Barack Obama slam illegal immigration in State of the Union speeches
JStone / Shutterstock.com
“Real reform means establishing a responsible pathway to earned citizenship, a path that included passing a background check, paying taxes and a meaningful penalty, learning English and going to the back of the line behind the folks trying to come here legally,” the president declared during his State of the Union address, eliciting a show of support from both chambers of Congress. Yet, these were not what liberals would later call the bigoted demands of President Donald Trump — this was the unmistakably firm position of former President Barack Obama.

Ideas that Democratic lawmakers refused to stand and applaud for on Tuesday night were enthusiastically received when they originated from the darlings of the left. In fact, both Obama and President Bill Clinton received standing ovations from their party when they announced realistic immigration policies during their own State of the Union speeches.

Take a look at these speeches from Obama and Clinton, delivered in 2013 and 1996 respectively, via IJR:

VIDEO

Deporters-in-Chief
Despite the outraged objections from Democrats, Trump’s immigration policies are not new or radical proposals — they are common sense reforms approved by a supermajority of informed American voters.

While Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) insist that the “vast majority of Americans” oppose Trump’s “America First” policies, surveys from National Research Inc. and The Polling Company demonstrate that as many as 70 to 80 percent of Americans support Trump’s tough immigration reforms.

The will of the majority is precisely what compelled Bill Clinton to pursue an immigration reform that is practically indistinguishable from Trump’s policies in 2018. Addressing Congress and the American people 22 years ago, Clinton said:

All Americans, not only in the states most heavily affected, but in every place in this country, are rightly disturbed by the large numbers of illegal aliens entering our country. The jobs they hold might otherwise be held by citizens or legal immigrants. The public service they use impose burdens on our taxpayers. That’s why our administration has moved aggressively to secure our borders more by hiring a record number of new border guards, by deporting twice as many criminal aliens as ever before, by cracking down on illegal hiring, by barring welfare benefits to illegal aliens.

Similarly, Obama approved of strict immigration measures during his presidency, and his 2013 State of the Union address reflects his contemporaneous endorsement of Trump’s “America First” vision. Obama spoke to Americans about what he called “real reform:”

Real reform means establishing a responsible pathway to earned citizenship – a path that includes passing a background check, paying taxes and a meaningful penalty, learning English, and going to the back of the line behind the folks trying to come here legally.

And real reform means fixing the legal immigration system to cut waiting periods, reduce bureaucracy, and attract the highly-skilled entrepreneurs and engineers that will help create jobs and grow our economy.

“Send me a comprehensive immigration reform bill in the next few months, and I will sign it right away,” Obama declared. Ironically, Trump asked the same from Democrats, offering an extremely favorable deal that would provide citizenship to 1.8 million so-called Dreamers if they agreed to negotiate on comprehensive immigration reform.

Still Democrats couldn’t get behind the deal.

Strange bedfellows
Policies that were desirable just over one year ago and under a Democratic president are suddenly unacceptable — even racist — today. Apparently, Democrats forget that the “deporter-in-chief,” as immigration activists called Obama, formalized the deportation process, officially removing more illegal immigrants than both Bush and Clinton combined in a streamlined system that helped ensure that these illegal immigrants would not attempt to cross the border again.

Obama was simply echoing policies from his Democratic forebears in the Oval Office. It was Clinton, after all, who established new grounds for deportation, enacted stiff penalties for aliens who repeatedly re-enter the country, mandated sentences for offenders, and a set up a framework for cooperation on immigration between federal and local law enforcement agencies.

As Pelosi and Schumer sat with crossed arms, deploring every last word spoken by President Trump, Americans were reminded of an impetuous child throwing a tantrum when their parent shows too much affection to a sibling. Either congressional Democrats cannot recall their enthusiastic support for comprehensive immigration reform, or they just revealed their hypocritical partisanship during Trump’s State of the Union address.

In either case, 2018 would be a perfect time for these lawmakers to abdicate their congressional authority and make way for fresh, energized representatives who will not succumb to vindictive politicization.

It’s high time for a change.