POLL: Is Partial Birth Abortion Murder?

Teen Vogue Column Instructs 16-Year-Old How to Obtain an Abortion Without Parental Permission
Jun 13, 2019 08:20 pm
Teen Vogue Column Instructs 16-Year-Old How to Obtain an Abortion Without Parental Permission
OPINION (FW) – Teen Vogue, a popular magazine amongst minors, recently published a column instructing a 16-year-old girl how to bypass state laws to receive an abortion. According to Life Site News, the magazine, which often shares harmful advice to its young followers, published a column by Nona Willis Aronowitz in which she responded to a letter from a reader about obtaining an abortion. In

the letter, the reader asks Aronowitz how she can get an abortion without telling her pro-life parents.

Continue reading Teen Vogue Column Instructs 16-Year-Old How to Obtain an Abortion Without Parental Permission at End Time Headlines.
https://endtimeheadlines.org/2019/06/teen-vogue-column-instructs-16-year-old-how-to-obtain-an-abortion-without-parental-permission/

Birth Strikers’ Are Refusing to Have Kids Because of Climate Change
https://www.faithwire.com/2019/06/10/birth-strikers-are-refusing-to-have-kids-because-of-climate-change/?utm_source=FWNL
By Tré Goins-Phillips
Editor

June 10, 2019
A very small group of people are refusing to have children in hopes of preventing what they refer to as an “ecological armageddon.”

The burgeoning “Birth Strikers” movement, which consists of 330 people so far, is made up of men (20 percent) and women (80 percent) who believe their choosing not to reproduce will prevent or delay the end of the earth as a result of climate change, according to a CNN report.

 Embedded video

CNN

@CNN
 Members of BirthStrike, a UK-based group, are refusing to have children, because of the threats posed by climate change http://cnn.it/2HWlpHK 

259
3:20 PM - Jun 5, 2019
384 people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy
One member, a 33-year-old musician named Blythe Pepino, told the news outlet she wants to have a biological child with her partner but said she doesn’t “feel like this is a time that you can do that.”

“Birth Strikers” have determined they can’t have children because climate change is causing bigger wildfires, more droughts, and greater food shortages around the world. So to have kids, they argue, would be counterproductive and cruel.

POWERFUL PHOTOS: Young Mom Who Chose Life Gives Newborn to Adopting Family

“You are gambling with someone else’s life,” 29-year-old member Cody Harrison explained. “If things don’t go well, that human is not going to have a very good life.”

“When climate change gets worse, it multiplies other things. It’s like dominoes that are falling,” said Lori Day, another member of the movement. “It goes beyond sea level rise and storms. It affects food production, migration, resources and war.”

The group is relying heavily on a United Nations study from 2018, which suggested there are only 11 years left to prevent nondescript “irreversible damage from climate change.”

While the “Birth Strikers” group is incredibly small, the kind of thinking that has undergirded the movement is growing. Earlier this year, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez questioned whether it’s morally permissible for people to continue having children.

In an Instagram Live video, the self-avowed Democratic Socialist said, “There’s scientific consensus that the lives of children are going to be very difficult. And it does lead young people to have a legitimate question: is it OK to still have children?”

Wendy’s Encourages Adoption With Genius New Initiative

The truth of the matter is neither Ocasio-Cortez nor the “Birth Strikers” have anything to worry about, because the birth rate in the U.S. has been in a steady decline for seven years. In 2017, the most recent year for which data is available, the nationwide fertility rate was 16 percent below the level necessary to keep the population stable.

All of it, though, is at odds with Scripture, which elevates the importance of giving birth to and adopting children and raising a family. The psalmist described kids as “a heritage from the Lord” and “like arrows in the hand of a warrior.”

And in the New Testament, Jesus himself placed incredible value on children, rebuking his disciples when they assumed he was uninterested in engaging with kids because they were young. After seeing his followers shoo children away from him, Jesus replied, “Let the little children come to me, and do not hinder them, for the kingdom of God belongs to such as these.”

“Truly I tell you, anyone who will not receive the kingdom of God like a little child will never enter it,” he continued, according to Mark 10.

God has given us dominion over the earth, and we need to be better stewards of the blessings he’s given us — there’s no doubt about that. But he also commanded us to multiply. These two tasks are not mutually exclusive, and we’d do well to stop playing god.

Parler

Abortion is ‘a Form of Killing That We Need to Defend’ Feminist Argues
Photo credit: Getty Images

By Lindsay Elizabeth
Author

June 10, 2019
While some abortion supporters couch their language with safe-sounding terminologies like ‘choice’, ‘women’s health’, ‘tough-decision’ and more – others aren’t being so careful.

One such person is Sophia Lewis, whose new book which details abortion as “necessary violence.”

‘Being Pro-Abortion is Not Real Feminism’: Nikki Haley Shreds Pro-Choice Movement

In a new video for Verso Books, Lewis explained the context of her new book “Full Surrogacy Now: Feminism Against Family,” in which she defends abortion as a morally acceptable and even necessary option.

In her book, Lewis describes pregnancy as “gestational work” and abortion as “an acceptable violence” and “a form of killing that we need to be able to defend.”

In the promotional video shared to Twitter, Lewis argued that “We’re facing a really terrible attack on abortion. In the U.S. where I live, in Northern Ireland and elsewhere.”

 Embedded video

Verso Books
@VersoBooks
 Abortion is a form of necessary violence. We need to move away from arguments designed to placate our enemies, and defend abortion as a right to stop doing gestational work | @reproutopia

Sophie Lewis is the author of Full Surrogacy Now: Feminism Against Family

329
2:00 PM - Jun 7, 2019
1,229 people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy
Lewis argued that the pro-choice movement needs to stop conceding to the pro-life movement by admitting that abortion is bad because according to Lewis, it is what it is: “a form of killing that we need to be able to defend.”

“We have very little to lose at the moment when it comes to abortion and I’m interested in winning radically,” Lewis argued. ” I wonder if we could think about defending abortion as a right to stop doing gestational work. Abortion is, in my opinion, and I recognize how controversial this is, a form of killing. It is a form of killing that we need to be able to defend.”

After admitting that abortion is, in fact, killing, Lewis argued that it is a form of killing that we need to defend and accept as a society.

Feminist Activist Gloria Steinem Compares Pro-Lifers to Hitler in Disturbing Interview

Lewis further pointed out that she does not care what is deemed a human life, and can “see the forms of making and unmaking each other as continuous processes.”

“The other end of the spectrum is learning how to die well and hold each other and let each other go at the end of our lives, as well as at the beginning,” she added.

She pointed out that violence is only unacceptable when a women does not want to have an abortion, but when she does its acceptable.

Referring to pregnancy as “gestational work,” Lewis compared aborting a baby to going on strike at work.

“The violence that the gestator meets out to essentially go on strike or exit that workplace is an acceptable violence,” she argued.

In Lewis’s new book “Full Surrogacy Now: Feminism Against Family,” she argued that the family structure itself should be abolished and that the only way humans should reproduce is if they use a surrogate.

Lewis “specifically links family abolition to a radical reconceptualization of pregnancy itself. The act of carrying a child to term, she insists, is work—labor that has long been exploited and overlooked by the academy—and so is mothering,” according to the magazine The Nation.

The responses
The responses on social media were swift. “Openly admitting that abortion is murder that should be accepted is really where we are going as a society..? These are dark times, friends,” one user added.


Verso Books
@VersoBooks
 · Jun 7, 2019
 Abortion is a form of necessary violence. We need to move away from arguments designed to placate our enemies, and defend abortion as a right to stop doing gestational work | @reproutopia

Sophie Lewis is the author of Full Surrogacy Now: Feminism Against Family

 Embedded video

Antoinette Lopes
@AntoinetteLopes
Openly admitting that abortion is murder that should be accepted is really where we are going as a society..? These are dark times, friends.

1,117
8:40 PM - Jun 8, 2019
Twitter Ads info and privacy
100 people are talking about this
Another user tweeted: “if we can defend the right to kill an innocent person, then where does it end?”


Verso Books
@VersoBooks
 · Jun 7, 2019
 Abortion is a form of necessary violence. We need to move away from arguments designed to placate our enemies, and defend abortion as a right to stop doing gestational work | @reproutopia

Sophie Lewis is the author of Full Surrogacy Now: Feminism Against Family

 Embedded video

B for Bendetta
@BenBMalone
if we can defend the right to kill an innocent person, then where does it end?? if every American thought this way it would lead to our destruction.

34
3:59 AM - Jun 10, 2019
Twitter Ads info and privacy
See B for Bendetta's other Tweets

Nurse arrested again over deaths of babies at neo-natal unit 
Georgia Diebelius
Monday 10 Jun 2019 10:05 am 
 Ms Letby has also been arrested in connection with the attempted murder of three more babies
 (Picture: SWNS) A nurse has been re-arrested on suspicion of the murders of eight babies at a hospital neo-natal unit. 

Lucy Letby, 28, was initially arrested last July on suspicion of the murder of eight babies and the attempted murder of six other infants as part of a police inquiry into the deaths of 17 babies at the Countess of Chester Hospital.

 It is understood she was re-arrested on Tuesday based on further evidence that has been gathered by Cheshire Police. Ms Letby has also been arrested in connection with the attempted murder of three more babies. Detectives launched an investigation into infant deaths at the hospital in May 2017, initially looking at the deaths of 15 babies between June 2015 and June 2016. It is understood she was re-arrested on 

Tuesday based on further evidence that has been gathered by Cheshire Police (Picture: Mercury Press & Media) Detectives launched an investigation into the infant deaths at the Countess of Chester hospital in May 2017 (Picture: PA) The probe has since widened and police are currently investigating the deaths of 17 babies and 16 non-fatal collapses between March 2015 and July 2016. 

Today, Cheshire Police Detective Inspector Paul Hughes, who is in charge of the investigation, said: ‘As part of our ongoing investigation we have today re-arrested the healthcare professional on suspicion of murder in relation to the deaths of eight babies and the attempted murder of six babies.

‘She has also been arrested in connection with the attempted murder of three additional babies. ‘The woman is currently in custody helping officers with their enquiries. ‘I would like to reassure people that we are doing everything we can as quickly as we can to identify what has led to these baby deaths and collapses.
 ‘Due to the nature of this investigation it is extremely challenging but it is important to remember that it is very much active and ongoing – there are no set timescales and we remain committed to carrying out a thorough investigation as soon as possible. ‘At this stage, we are unable to go into any further details about the investigation but as soon as we can provide any further updates we will do’.

Read more: https://metro.co.uk/2019/06/10/nurse-arrested-deaths-babies-neo-natal-unit-9882846/?ico=pushly-notifcation-small&utm_source=pushly?ito=cbshare

Twitter: https://twitter.com/MetroUK | Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/MetroUK/

Delaware County Church Vandalized With Abortion Rights Graffiti
May 21, 2019 09:16 am
Delaware County Church Vandalized With Abortion Rights Graffiti
(CBS) – As the abortion battle rages on across the United States, a church in Delaware County was targeted by vandals who tagged it with abortion rights graffiti and more Sunday. Heading into church for Sunday mass, parishioners at Notre Dame de Lourdes parish in Swarthmore were met with black spray paint that said, “You do not have the right to decide how others lives.” “It was very shocking to come up to the church and see that,” Jessica Prince told CBS3.

Continue reading Delaware County Church Vandalized With Abortion Rights Graffiti at End Time Headlines.
https://endtimeheadlines.org/2019/05/delaware-county-church-vandalized-with-abortion-rights-graffiti/

News anchor reveals something alarming about Democrats
By Leah Rosenberg -  April 7, 2019 5679 0
https://israelunwired.com/news-anchor-reveals-something-alarming-about-democrats/
This News anchor reveals the alarming truth about the Democratic Party. The way Congressmen are acting and the policies that are changing the party are taking a toll on American values.

History Will Judge The Cowards
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=54&v=hFeJUBWNd3I&ab_channel=TippingPointWithLizWheeleronOAN

Boost this video to reach up to 1000 people
Democratic Party
The modern-day democratic party was created in 1828 by supporters of Andrew Jackson. The Democrats dominant worldview was once social conservatism and economic liberalism. Since the New Deal Coalition in the 1930s, led by Roosevelt, the Democratic Party has led a socially liberal platform.

The Democratic National Committee is responsible for promoting Democratic campaign activities. It is more focused on campaigns and organizational strategy then party policy. The Chairman for this Committee is a man called Tom Perez, former Labor Secretary.

‘I Love God’: Hollywood Actress Says She Believes in God, Then Misuses the Bible to Promote Abortion
Apr 02, 2019 01:05 pm
‘I Love God’: Hollywood Actress Says She Believes in God, Then Misuses the Bible to Promote Abortion
OPINION (CBN News) – Actress Alyssa Milano is an outspoken pro-abortion advocate who is outraged by Georgia’s “heartbeat” bill. The bill bans abortions as soon as a baby’s heartbeat is detected, which can be as early as six weeks into the pregnancy. Milano is publicly fighting the measure by partnering with other celebrities who vow to boycott Georgia if it is signed into law. On Monday, Milano posted a list of Hollywood celebrities who

refuse to business with the peach state if the pro-life bill passes.

Continue reading 
‘I Love God’: Hollywood Actress Says She Believes in God, Then Misuses the Bible to Promote Abortion at End Time Headlines.
http://www1.cbn.com/cbnnews/entertainment/2019/april/i-love-god-hollywood-actress-says-she-believes-in-god-then-misuses-the-bible-to-promote-abortion?cpid=:ID:-32937-:DT:-2019-04-02-09:32:23-:US:-AB1-:CN:-CP1-:PO:-NC1-:ME:-SU1-:SO:-FB1-:SP:-NW1-:PF:-TX1-

Dems block 'born alive' bill to provide medical care to infants who survive failed abortions
Caleb Parke By Caleb Parke, Gregg Re | Fox News
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/senate-to-vote-on-born-alive-bill-to-protect-infants-who-survive-a-failed-abortion?fbclid=IwAR1HQ3bRqO4gRj3iixqvjukho7uO_zK46ECgjt7WWgNqlkexvSfmd-SZIts
Sasse on pro-life bill defeat: A baby has dignity and worth
Senate Democrats on Monday blocked a Republican bill that would have threatened prison time for doctors who don't try saving the life of infants born alive during failed abortions, leading conservatives to wonder openly whether Democrats were embracing "infanticide" to appeal to left-wing voters.

All prominent Democratic 2020 presidential hopefuls in the Senate voted down the measure, including Bernie Sanders of Vermont, Kamala Harris of California, Cory Booker of New Jersey, Kirsten Gillibrand of New York, Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota and Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts. The final vote was 53-44 to end Democratic delaying tactics -- seven votes short of the 60 needed.

ABORTION SURVIVOR: SENATE DEMS ARE 'WILLING TO SACRIFICE LIVES LIKE MINE TO KEEP ABORTION-ON-DEMAND'

Three Democrats joined Republicans to support the bill -- Joe Manchin of West Virginia, Bob Casey of Pennsylvania and Doug Jones or Alabama. Three Republicans did not vote, apparently because of scheduling issues and plane flight delays -- including Kevin Cramer of North Dakota, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Tim Scott of South Carolina.

The Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act would have required that "any health care practitioner present" at the time of a birth "exercise the same degree of professional skill, care, and diligence to preserve the life and health of the child as a reasonably diligent and conscientious health care practitioner would render to any other child born alive at the same gestational age."
Donald J. Trump

@realDonaldTrump
 · 15h
 Senate Democrats just voted against legislation to prevent the killing of newborn infant children. The Democrat position on abortion is now so extreme that they don’t mind executing babies AFTER birth....
Donald J. Trump

@realDonaldTrump
....This will be remembered as one of the most shocking votes in the history of Congress. If there is one thing we should all agree on, it’s protecting the lives of innocent babies.

156K
1:50 AM - Feb 26, 2019
Twitter Ads info and privacy
62.1K people are talking about this
The bill, which exempted the mother involved in the birth from prosecution, also would have required practitioners to "ensure that the child born alive is immediately transported and admitted to a hospital." It prescribed a possible term of imprisonment of up to five years for violations, not including penalties for first-degree murder that could have applied.

In response, President Trump tweeted late Monday that "This will be remembered as one of the most shocking votes in the history of Congress."

GOP SENATOR SOUNDS ALARM ON TRUMP'S KAVANAUGH REPLACEMENT ON D.C. CIRCUIT -- IS SHE PRO-CHOICE?

"Senate Democrats just voted against legislation to prevent the killing of newborn infant children," Trump wrote. "The Democrat position on abortion is now so extreme that they don’t mind executing babies AFTER birth."

Other Republicans were also incredulous. "I want to ask each and every one of my colleagues whether or not we're OK with infanticide," said the measure's chief sponsor, Sen. Ben Sasse, R-Neb.

Speaking to Fox News' "The Story" after the vote, Sasse said he was "surprised" at each vote against the bill, and charged that opponents had lied "constantly" with "blatant nonsense" about the legislation -- specifically, by claiming the bill "would end abortion" entirely.

At least 20 abortion cases are in the pipeline to the Supreme Court
Constitutional law attorney Jenna Ellis weighs in on the possibility of Roe v. Wade being overturned.

"This is about the most simple thing you can say, which is that a baby is a baby, and they have dignity and worth," Sasse said. "And it's not because they're powerful. It's because they're babies. Today is a sad day in the United States Senate."

Sasse added, "This shouldn't be about politics. ... This should be about having heart."

Other pro-life activists called on the 44 senators who voted against Sasse's bill to resign immediately.

“Senators who could not bring themselves to vote to pass the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act should reconsider whether or not they have what it takes to serve," March for Life President Jeanne Mancini said in a statement. "Senator Sasse’s common sense bill would merely require doctors assist a newborn struggling to survive after a failed attempt on her life. Anyone who lacks the basic level of human compassion needed to vote in favor of this should quickly find another job. We look forward to a vote in the House of Representatives so that Chamber can get on record as well.”

Opponents, noting the rarity of such births and citing laws already making it a crime to kill newborn babies, said the bill was unnecessary. They said it was part of a push by abortion opponents to curb access to the procedure and intimidate doctors who perform it, and said late-term abortions generally occur when the infant is considered incapable of surviving after birth.

“This bill is just another line of attack in the ongoing war on women’s health,” New Hampshire Democratic Sen. Jeanne Shaheen said on the Senate floor.

Sasse's bill would have faced an uphill battle in the House, where Democrats hold the majority.

Pro-life activists protesting outside of the U.S. Supreme Court during the March for Life in Washington last month. (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana, File)
Pro-life activists protesting outside of the U.S. Supreme Court during the March for Life in Washington last month. (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana, File)
A similar 2002 bill, called the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act, was passed unanimously by the Senate in 2002 and signed by then-President George W. Bush.

Sasse attempted to pass the new bill by unanimous consent earlier this month but was blocked. Unanimous consent requires all 100 senators to agree, and Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., objected to Sasse's bill, saying the legislation was unnecessary and amounted to a political stunt.

The legislation was introduced after Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam, a Democrat, endorsed post-birth abortions while discussing The Repeal Act, a state bill which sought to repeal restrictions on third-trimester abortions. Virginia Democratic Del. Kathy Tran, a sponsor of that bill, was asked at a hearing if a woman about to give birth and dilating could still request an abortion.

"My bill would allow that, yes,” Tran said. Northam, in a later interview with a radio station, backed up Tran.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

"When we talk about third-trimester abortions, these are done with the consent of, obviously, the mother, with the consent of the physicians, more than one physician, by the way," Northam said. "And, it's done in cases where there may be severe deformities, there may be a fetus that's non-viable."

Northam continued: "So, in this particular example, if a mother is in labor, I can tell you exactly what would happen. The infant would be delivered. The infant would be kept comfortable. The infant would be resuscitated if that's what the mother and the family desired, and then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother. So, I think this was really blown out of proportion."

Fox News' Martha MacCallum, Alex Pappas and The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Caleb Parke is an associate editor for FoxNews.com. You can follow him on Twitter @calebparke

Tragic: Senate Democrats Block Anti-Infanticide Bill
https://bongino.com/tragic-senate-democrats-block-anti-infanticide-bill/?utm_source=push&utm_medium=push_notifications&utm_campaign=TRAGIC&utm_content=&utm_term=
by Team Bongino
February 5, 2019
A bill proposed by Senate Republicans to protect babies that survived abortions was blocked by Democrats yesterday.
The Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, authored by Sen. Ben Sasse (R-NE), would require abortion doctors to seek medical care for babies that survived abortions and would criminalize the deliberate killing of the child after delivery.

Sasse sought “unanimous consent” for his bill, meaning just one Senator could object and stop the legislation.

Washington Senator, Democrat Patty Murray objected to the bill and prevented it from receiving unanimous consent, claiming the law was unnecessary because there are already laws protecting babies from infanticide.

“This is a gross misinterpretation of the actual language of the bill that is being asked to be considered and, therefore, I object,” she said, before immediately leaving after her objection.
Murray was the only Democrat on the Senate floor last night.

During a speech on the Senate floor last week in support of the bill, Sasse said, “Everyone in the Senate ought to be able to say unequivocally that killing that little baby is wrong. This doesn’t take any political courage. And, if you can’t say that, if there’s a member of this body that can’t say that, there may be lots of work you can do in the world but you shouldn’t be here. You should get the heck out of any calling in public life where you pretend to care about the most vulnerable among us,” he said.

The Senator continued, “There should be no politics here that are right vs. left, or Republican vs. Democrat. This is the most basic thing you could be talking about. We’re talking about a little baby born alive and we have a public official in America defending the idea ‘Well, you could have a debate about killing her.'”

Sasse’s bill came as a response to the disturbing comments made by Virginia Governor Ralph Northam in which he endorsed infanticide in certain circumstances.

Speaking to Fox News, Sasse slammed the governor for his comments and said he should “get the hell out of office.”
“The comments the governor of Virginia made were about fourth-term abortions,” Sasse said to Fox News host Dana Perino. “That’s not abortion, that’s infanticide.”

POLL: Is Partial Birth Abortion Murder?
February 3, 2019
https://www.patriotpollalerts.com/partial-birth-abortion-murder/?utm_source=ppa&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=ppa-1
Ken Wolter / Shutterstock.com
NOTE: To vote in our poll, make sure to read to the bottom. You can answer the poll there and let your voice be heard.

Partial-birth abortion is murder in plain English.

A simple description of the brutal procedure should be enough to convince anyone with a beating heart. As the term “partial-birth” indicates, the procedure involves dilating the mother’s cervix and pulling a baby out feet first except for the head, then puncturing the baby’s head with scissors and sucking its brains out with a vacuum.

This is murder — the willful, deliberate termination of life. While abortionists argue that “partial-birth abortion” is a political rather than a medical term, abortion is a moral matter, not a medical one.

Partial-birth abortion is, basically, a paradox. The only thing distinguishing partial-birth abortion from plain infanticide is that the baby’s head is still inside the uterus.

The abortion industry has peddled all kinds of lies about the procedure to make it sound like it’s essentially a conservative myth. The abortion industry still performs partial-birth abortions, they just lie about it.

One can argue about the circumstances, but this is always how abortionists justify abortion at any stage — circumstantially, in terms of the troubles spared for the mother or society, or in very rare cases, the mother’s life.

But most partial-birth abortions are performed on healthy babies of healthy mothers. The mother’s life is rarely at risk. As with most abortions, partial-birth abortion is usually murder for convenience.

Leftists often try to argue that a baby is not a human before a certain date, or when it’s inside the uterus, but there is no room for splitting hairs when a baby is alive, kicking, and born.

Leftists feel pressured to dismiss partial-birth abortion as a myth because it is a particularly visceral, gruesome procedure that illustrates the ugly reality of all abortion. It’s simple butchery.

Is Partial Birth Abortion Murder?
Yes
No
Next
https://www.patriotpollalerts.com/partial-birth-abortion-murder/?utm_source=ppa&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=ppa-1