Breaking UN Send Nasty Message to Trump -How should he Respond

Trump Turns Up The Heat On N. Korea: ‘Things Will Happen To Them They Never Thought Possible’
http://conservativefighters.com/news/trump-turns-heat-n-korea-things-will-happen-never-thought-possible/
President Trump issued a new warning to North Korea Thursday, upping the ante after the president’s “fire and fury” statement Tuesday.

Trump suggested Thursday that his prior statements on North Korea, which received a great deal of criticism from some observers, were “not tough enough.”

“[Kim Jong Un] has been pushing the world around for a long time,” the president told reporters Thursday.

“I will tell you this, if North Korea does anything in terms of even thinking about attack of anybody that we love or we represent or our allies or us, they can be very, very nervous,” he explained. “They should be very nervous. Things will happen to them like they never thought possible.”

“North Korea better get its act together or they’ll be in trouble like few nations have ever been in trouble in this world,” Trump added.

In response to questions concerning the possibility of a preemptive strike on North Korea, he simply said, “We’ll see what happens.”

The president’s latest statements follow a strong statement Tuesday signaling that the U.S. will no longer tolerate North Korean hostility and aggression as past administrations have.

“North Korea best not make any more threats to the United States,” Trump declared Tuesday. “They will be met with the fire and fury like the world has never seen. He has been very threatening beyond a normal state, and as I said, they will be met with the fire and fury and, frankly, power the likes of which this world has never seen before.”




FLASHBACK 1994: Clinton Says His Deal With North Korea Would Make The World Safer http://conservativefighters.com/news/flashback-1994-clinton-says-deal-north-korea-make-world-safer/
Former President Bill Clinton thought he saved the world from a nuclear North Korea more than two decades ago, but he was wrong.

North Korea now has an intercontinental ballistic missile that can range most of the continental U.S., and a new Defense Intelligence Agency assessment suggests that North Korea has successfully miniaturized nuclear warheads for its missiles. The North is, according to a recent defense intelligence report, expected to be able to field a reliable, nuclear-armed ICBM as early as next year.

In the early 1990s, Clinton faced a growing nuclear threat from North Korea, but he ultimately chose diplomacy and deals over the application of military force.

“I was determined to prevent North Korea from developing a nuclear arsenal, even at the risk of war,” Clinton wrote in his memoirs. He decided to change course after receiving “a sobering estimate of the staggering losses both sides would suffer if war broke out.”

Before North Korea had nuclear weapons, the anticipated casualty count in the event of a renewed conflict on the peninsula was in the hundreds of thousands. Instead of war, Clinton chose the Agreed Framework, promising billions of dollars in aid for a North Korean nuclear freeze.

“This is a good deal for the United States,” he said at the time. “North Korea will freeze and then dismantle its nuclear program. South Korea and our other allies will be better protected. The entire world will be safer as we slow the spread of nuclear weapons.”
WATCH VIDEO BILL CLINTON

NKorea Flashback: Bill Clinton on his deal with North Korea "The world will be safer." Whoops.
9:26 PM - Aug 8, 2017
829 829 Replies 7,580 7,580 Retweets 9,250 9,250 likes
Twitter Ads info and privacy
The North Koreans negotiated in bad faith, however, offering false promises to convince the U.S. to unwittingly subsidize their nuclear program. The country began enriching nuclear material, and North Korea conducted its first nuclear test a little over a decade later. North Korea has since continued its steady march to becoming a fully-armed nuclear power. Evidence suggests that North Korea will achieve its nuclear weapons goals much sooner than analysts and experts previously expected.

North Korea advanced its program throughout the Bush and Obama administrations, bringing the U.S. to the risky situation it now faces.

“North Korea best not make any more threats to the United States,” Donald Trump declared to the White House press pool Tuesday. “They will be met with the fire and fury like the world has never seen. He has been very threatening beyond a normal state, and as I said, they will be met with the fire and fury and, frankly, power the likes of which this world has never seen before.”
While the casualty count in a North Korean crisis might have been high in the 1990s, the cost of a conflict now that North Korea has nuclear weapons would be in the millions.




RUMORS OF WAR: North Korea may strike US targets in South Korea if provoked by Americans
AUGUST 11, 2017
North Korea may well fulfil its threat to hit US targets on South Korean territory if continued pressure by Washington puts Pyongyang at an impasse, Pavel Zolotarev, a retired Russian Major General, told RT. “A US strike against North Korea may go against common logic, but when a country is governed by propaganda – and the United States are going through such a period – political decisions go beyond rational logic, and there we can have consequences that are hard to foresee,”

Zolotarev warned. On Wednesday, US President Donald Trump promised to bring “fire and fury like the world has never seen” on North Korea if it doesn’t stop tests aimed at the developing a nuclear-tipped long-range ballistic missile. Than the next day he went even further to say that the “fire and fury” warning to North Korea may not have been “tough enough.” Increased pressure from Washington may force the North to “be more assertive in terms of retaliatory measures,” with South Korea becoming hostage in this situation, he warned.
READ MORE https://www.rt.com/news/399249-north-korea-us-conflict-missiles/

Pyongyang may hit US targets in S. Korea if provoked by Americans – Russian general to RT
Published time: 10 Aug, 2017 22:45
https://www.rt.com/news/399249-north-korea-us-conflict-missiles/

Pyongyang may hit US targets in S. Korea if provoked by Americans – Russian general to RT
FILE PHOTO: South Korean Army's multiple launch rocket system (MLRS) © Kim Hong-Ji / Reuters
North Korea may well fulfil its threat to hit US targets on South Korean territory if continued pressure by Washington puts Pyongyang at an impasse, Pavel Zolotarev, a retired Russian Major General, told RT.
“A US strike against North Korea may go against common logic, but when a country is governed by propaganda – and the United States are going through such a period – political decisions go beyond rational logic, and there we can have consequences that are hard to foresee,” Zolotarev warned.

Read more
© Zach Gibson / Global Look Press‘Fire and fury’ wasn’t tough enough - Trump on North Korea
On Wednesday, US President Donald Trump promised to bring “fire and fury like the world has never seen” on North Korea if it doesn’t stop tests aimed at the developing a nuclear-tipped long-range ballistic missile. Than the next day he went even further to say that the “fire and fury” warning to North Korea may not have been “tough enough.”

Increased pressure from Washington may force the North to “be more assertive in terms of retaliatory measures,” with South Korea becoming hostage in this situation, he warned.

“Strikes may be carried out, targeting either US facilities in South Korea or the South Korean territory itself,” Zolotarev, who is the Deputy Director of the Institute for US and Canadian Studies at the Russian Academy of Sciences, said.

“One shouldn’t forget that the South Korean capital, Seoul, is within the reach of (North Korean) artillery,” he added.

READ MORE: N. Koreans denounce Trump's 'fire & fury' threat in massive rally (VIDEO)

The expert stressed that claims by Korean People’s Army that they have plans worked out to strike US bases in Guam are “no bluff.”

“Every country’s military have to elaborate deployment strategies for any eventuality. It is politicians – not the military – who decide on whether or not to use such plans… So, if North Korean military talk of such plans, it means they actually have them,” he explained.

If the armed confrontation between the US and the North eventually breaks out, the Americans shouldn’t expect it to be a walk in the park, Zolotarev said.

“The North Korean military may inflict significant damage to US forces during a conventional conflict. Though their equipment is far beyond the American assets, their combat readiness and military morale are much higher,” he said.

‘N Koreans will sell last shirt for ICBM’
No threats from Washington or even the harshest sanctions will make Pyongyang abandon its plan to develop its own intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM), Aleksandr Tsalko, a Russian retired Air Force general, told RT.

“[The North Koreans] will sell the last shirt from their back, but will make [the missile],” Tsalko said.

However, he expressed doubt that Pyongyang currently has the capability to carry out nuclear strikes against American bases in Guam and elsewhere if attacked.

Read more
© KyodoTrump can strike North Korea without approval from Congress - Sen. Graham
https://www.rt.com/usa/399240-trump-north-korea-graham-congress/

“They claim they have one, but having a long-range missile and being capable of delivering a nuclear strike are two different things. They need to make a nuclear warhead that their missile can carry, to learn how to hit a target with it at long range,” the co-founder of the Council for Foreign and Defense Policies said.

“I doubt North Korea now has a guidance system good enough for that. They can make a bang somewhere in the sea, but that’s all,” he added.

Despite the US being serious about North Korean claims that it tested an ICBM, the Russian military insists that its data shows that Pyongyang only fired a mid-range missile.

The former general said that while the US is overwhelmingly more powerful than North Korea, launching an attack at the country would come with a significant cost for America’s allies in the region, namely South Korea and Japan.

“However few short and intermediate-range missiles North Korea has, they are enough to cause unacceptable amount of damage, if a nuclear warhead is used,” he said.

“The Americans should have enough brains not to do it [attack Pyongyang]. As long as they don’t hurt North Korea, it will not take any action in return,” Tsalko said.

----------------------------
Trump can strike North Korea without approval from Congress - Sen. Graham
https://www.rt.com/usa/399240-trump-north-korea-graham-congress/
Published time: 10 Aug, 2017 19:46
Edited time: 10 Aug, 2017 20:09

Trump can strike North Korea without approval from Congress - Sen. Graham
© Kyodo / Reuters
1.2K2
President Donald Trump does not need Congressional authorization to carry out a preemptive strike against North Korea, according to Republican Senator Lindsay Graham.
The Senator from South Carolina said he “violently” disagreed with his colleague Senator Dan Sullivan (R-Alaska), who said that a “pre-emptive war” on the Korean peninsula “would require the authorization of Congress.”

“There’s nothing in the Constitution limiting the ability to use force to protect America,” Graham told radio host Hugh Hewitt on Thursday.

Follow
Lindsey Graham ✔ @LindseyGrahamSC
Cannot allow N Korea's capability to mature that puts every American in crosshairs of a nuclear attack by unstable provocative leader of NK.
4:10 PM - Aug 10, 2017
542 542 Replies 93 93 Retweets 405 405 likes
Twitter Ads info and privacy
He also said that Trump is “mentally” ready to preemptively strike North Korea “if negotiations fail,” based on his conversation with the president.

“I think he’s there mentally,” Graham said. “He has told me this.”

Graham has been a vocal opponent of Trump on many other foreign policy issues, and has sponsored a bill that limited Trump’s ability to waive or lift sanctions against Russia without Congressional approval, which the president called an unconstitutional encroachment on his executive powers.

On Tuesday, Trump warned North Korea that it would “face fire and fury like the world has never seen” if Pyongyang continues threatening the US and its ally South Korea.

Since then, North Korea has threatened to bomb the US Pacific territory of Guam, saying that a plan to fire four missiles near Guam would be ready for Kim Jong-un’s consideration within days.

Follow
RT ✔ @RT_com
N. Korea ponders striking US base in Guam after Trump threatens Pyongyang with ‘fire & fury’ https://www.rt.com/news/399036-guam-strike-north-korea/ …
7:40 AM - Aug 9, 2017
Photo published for N. Korea ponders striking US base in Guam after Trump threatens Pyongyang with ‘fire & fury’ — RT...
N. Korea ponders striking US base in Guam after Trump threatens Pyongyang with ‘fire & fury’ — RT...
Pyongyang said that it has been working on a plan to launch a medium-range ballistic missile at a US airbase in Guam. This comes after US bombers flew over the Korean Peninsula with Korean and...
rt.com
46 46 Replies 189 189 Retweets 138 138 likes
Twitter Ads info and privacy
North Korean state media issued a statement Wednesday, warning Washington that a “preemptive strike is no longer the monopoly of the US.”

On Thursday, Trump doubled down on his earlier comments saying that his “fire and fury” warning to North Korea may not have been “tough enough.”

North Korea should “get their act together” or it will “be in trouble like few nations have ever been,” Trump said when speaking to reporters at his Bedminster, New Jersey golf resort, where he is spending his vacation.

14h
RT America ✔ @RT_America
BREAKING: ‘Fire and fury’ wasn’t tough enough - Trump on North Korea http://on.rt.com/8k1z pic.twitter.com/mb1Z983B54
Follow
RT America ✔ @RT_America
#NorthKorea should “get their act together” or it will “be in trouble like few nations have ever been" - Trump http://on.rt.com/8k1z pic.twitter.com/fvvQRTBtr5
7:49 PM - Aug 10, 2017
View image on Twitter
7 7 Replies 23 23 Retweets 22 22 likes
Twitter Ads info and privacy
While Congress is in recess, some lawmakers, including Senator Bernie Sanders, have blasted Trump over his rhetoric on North Korea, saying it could result in millions of people being killed.

“Trump’s bombastic rhetoric is not appropriate when we are dealing with the possibility of a nuclear war that could kill millions of people,” the senator from Vermont tweeted.

9 Aug
Bernie Sanders ✔ @SenSanders
Trump’s bombastic rhetoric is not appropriate when we are dealing with the possibility of a nuclear war that could kill millions of people. https://twitter.com/CNN/status/895214037126000642 …
Follow
Bernie Sanders ✔ @SenSanders
We need serious people at the @StateDept dealing with the issue of North Korea’s development of nuclear weapons & missile capability.
8:04 PM - Aug 9, 2017
299 299 Replies 1,155 1,155 Retweets 6,397 6,397 likes
Twitter Ads info and privacy
Trump’s threats came on the heels of a report in the Washington Post earlier this week, which said that US intelligence analysts have assessed that North Korea has produced a miniaturized nuclear warhead, which could potentially fit in a missile.

On Thursday, it was reported that the US has a plan for a preemptive strike on North Korean missile sites with bombers stationed in Guam, should Donald Trump order it.

An attack by Rockwell B-1 Lancer supersonic heavy bombers from Andersen Air Force Base in the US territory of Guam makes up a major part of the plan, senior acting and retired military officials told NBC News.

The bomber strikes are “the best of a lot of bad options,” the outlet cited one senior intelligence official as saying.


President Trump Issues Even Harsher Statement Against N. Korea: ‘Things Will Happen to Them’
http://conservativefighters.com/news/president-trump-issues-even-harsher-statement-n-korea-things-will-happen/
After Thursday’s security briefing at his golf club in Bedminster, New Jersey, President Donald Trump told reporters that perhaps his “fire and fury” admonishments to North Korea weren’t “tough enough.”

“They’ve been doing this to our country for a long time, for many years,” Trump continued, speaking of North Korea and their threats of nuclear warfare against the United States. “And it’s about time that somebody stuck up for this country and for the people of other countries.”

Considering the statement he released earlier in the week which said that if North Korea didn’t back off their threats, “they will be met with fire and fury like the world has never seen,” Trump added, “If anything, maybe that statement wasn’t tough enough.”

North Korea claimed earlier in the week that they were “seriously examining the plan for an enveloping strike at Guam through simultaneous fire of four Hwasong-12 intermediate-range strategic ballistic rockets in order to interdirect the enemy forces on major military bases on Guam and to signal a crucial warning to the U.S.”

Thursday saw Trump respond to the country’s threats in kind.

“I will tell you this, if North Korea does anything in terms of even thinking about attack of anybody that we love or we represent or our allies or us, they can be very, very nervous,” Trump promised. “They should be very nervous. Things will happen to them like they never thought possible.”

Speaking directly about Kim Jong-Un, Trump added, “He has disrespected our country greatly. He has said things that are horrific. And with me, he’s not getting away with it.”

“It’s not a dare,” Trump continued. “It’s a statement. It has nothing to do with dare. That’s a statement. He’s not going to go around threatening Guam, and he’s not gonna threaten the United States, and he’s not gonna threaten Japan. He’s not gonna threaten South Korea. No, that’s not a dare, as you say. That is a statement of fact.”

See the president’s full remarks in the video below.
VIDEO 44vmins. https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=103&v=4Gkg0RtVeA0

BREAKING: U.N. Sends Nasty Message to Trump – How Should He Respond?
https://www.christiannewsalerts.com/u-n-sends-nasty-message-to-trump/?utm_medium=push&utm_source=AP&utm_campaign=onesignal
August 6, 2017 Jeff Charles
SHARE TO FACEBOOK  CLICK TO JOIN
There was a meaningless act of virtue signaling on behalf of the United Nations, who have decided that they can tell the United States how to deal with the issues of racism in our country.

A U.N. report published in 2016 found that the United State’s history of slavery and Jim Crow laws warrants reparations for the descendants of African slaves.

The Working Group of Experts on People of African Descent found that the United States’ history of enslavement, segregation, racially-driven violence, and inequality have had a markedly negative impact on black Americans. The report makes comparisons between the lynchings that occurred after slavery was abolished to the police brutality and killings inflicted on blacks at the hands of the police.

Of course, the UN’s recommendations are not binding on the United States — our laws supersede the mandates of the international community. However, their declaration is similar to the many calls for reparations by many people in American society.

The UN states that the reparations could come in the form of health initiatives, educational opportunities, and an official apology for the treatment of black Americans by the United States government. The group also stated that the United States could raise awareness through memorials, education, and monuments. The objective would be to limit the influence of white supremacist ideology.

The views of the American public on this issue are mixed. There are people both on the left and the right who either support or oppose reparations. In a piece for The National Review, Jonah Goldberg argues that reparations might be a positive step if it puts the debate over race relations in the United States to rest. He posits that if we were able to agree upon a number that was acceptable to all parties involved, it could provide a sense of closure. In this way, we could reduce the level of race-baiting and racial tensions in the country.

Of course, there is also the argument that providing reparations for the descendants of slaves would do nothing to curtail racial resentment. Indeed, people on the left would not want to lose one of their favorite weapons: hurling false accusations of racism against their political opponents.


Additionally, the issue of fairness also comes up. Should whites whose descendants did not own slaves have to use their tax dollars to pay for an atrocity their ancestors did not commit?

A United Nations committee has issued a report condemning the US history of slavery and calling for reparations to be paid to descendants of African slaves. Do you support this idea?

Should Americans pay reparations for slavery?

Yes
No
Next