Who is online?
In total there are 18 users online :: 0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 18 Guests

None

[ View the whole list ]


Most users ever online was 115 on Wed 03 Jul 2019, 3:20 pm
Latest topics
» Nolte: 11 Facts that Have Already Unraveled the Ukraine Hoax
OBAMA AGAIN  EmptyToday at 12:39 am by Admin

» Bill & Hillary Clinton
OBAMA AGAIN  EmptyToday at 12:24 am by Admin

» Delrifkah: HEBREW SAGE MIGHT SAY.
OBAMA AGAIN  EmptyToday at 12:23 am by Admin

»  Chip Brogden CHURCH WITHOUT WALLS
OBAMA AGAIN  EmptyToday at 12:20 am by Admin

» R.D SOUZA Saved by faith
OBAMA AGAIN  EmptyToday at 12:19 am by Admin

» My Manna
OBAMA AGAIN  EmptyToday at 12:18 am by Admin

» KEITH NOTES FROM NANJING
OBAMA AGAIN  EmptyToday at 12:05 am by Admin

» BREITBART NEWS
OBAMA AGAIN  EmptyYesterday at 11:59 pm by Admin

» The Threat To The Whole World
OBAMA AGAIN  EmptyYesterday at 10:31 pm by Admin

» BIBLE STUDY on VERSE
OBAMA AGAIN  EmptyYesterday at 8:27 pm by Admin

» servant @ TWO LISTENERS
OBAMA AGAIN  EmptyYesterday at 8:11 pm by Admin

» Pope Francis Agenda for One World Government
OBAMA AGAIN  EmptyYesterday at 8:07 pm by Admin

» PROPHESY NEWS WATCH
OBAMA AGAIN  EmptyYesterday at 10:00 am by Admin

» AISH
OBAMA AGAIN  EmptyYesterday at 9:56 am by Admin

» Daily Disciples
OBAMA AGAIN  EmptyYesterday at 9:53 am by Admin

» Mrs. P's Haven of Refuge Inspirational
OBAMA AGAIN  EmptyYesterday at 9:49 am by Admin

» ENDTIME HEADLINES
OBAMA AGAIN  EmptyYesterday at 9:42 am by Admin

» OBAMA AGAIN
OBAMA AGAIN  EmptySat 19 Oct 2019, 10:40 pm by Admin

» FRANCIS FRANGIPANE MINISTRIES
OBAMA AGAIN  EmptySat 19 Oct 2019, 10:37 pm by Admin

» GLOBAL WARMING FAKE IT IS COLD CLIMATE COMING
OBAMA AGAIN  EmptySat 19 Oct 2019, 10:29 pm by Admin

Navigation
 Portal
 Index
 Memberlist
 Profile
 FAQ
 Search

OBAMA AGAIN

Page 1 of 2 1, 2  Next

Go down

OBAMA AGAIN  Empty Re: OBAMA AGAIN

Post  Admin on Sat 19 Oct 2019, 10:40 pm

https://pjmedia.com/faith/court-strikes-down-obama-rule-forcing-doctors-to-perform-transgender-surgery/?fbclid=IwAR1wqlRTZb4_gZGYnzvxjrt-22XJ4pC92LWLnWItF1YzGSMPfQjB-nB4hdI

Court Strikes Down Obama Rule Forcing Doctors to Perform Transgender Surgery
 BY TYLER O'NEIL OCTOBER 19, 2019CHAT 9 COMMENTS
Barack Obama waves
Former U.S. President Barack Obama waves prior to delivering his speech during the 4th Congress of Indonesian Diaspora Network in Jakarta, Indonesia, Saturday, July 1, 2017. (AP Photo/Achmad Ibrahim)
On Tuesday, a district court judge struck down the Obama administration's since defunct mandate forcing doctors to perform transgender surgery regardless of their religious convictions or conscientious objections. The mandate, handed down by Obama's Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), ironically did not apply to Medicare and Medicaid or to military doctors because the government's own research showed that transgender hormones and surgeries can be harmful.

Under Trump, the HHS finalized rules protecting religious freedom, but the Obama mandate remained on the books.

The ruling in Franciscan Alliance v. Azar struck down that mandate and upheld the religious freedom of doctors who would refuse to administer hormone therapy and sex reassignment surgery. Some doctors have warned that even the hormones — the less invasive "treatment" — give healthy people a disease. The actual surgery often involves sterilizing a patient for life. Mandating such "treatments" would force doctors to violate the Hippocratic oath.


"It is critically important that doctors are able to continue serving patients in keeping with their consciences and their professional medical judgment, especially when it comes to the personal health choices of families and children," Luke Goodrich, vice president and senior counsel at Becket, the law firm representing the Franciscan Alliance, said in a statement. "Doctors cannot do their jobs if government bureaucrats are trying to force them to perform potentially harmful procedures that violate their medical and moral judgment."

"Today marks a major victory for compassion, conscience, and sound medical judgment," Goodrich added. "Our clients look forward to joyfully continuing to serve all patients, regardless of their sex or gender identity, and continuing to provide top-notch care to transgender patients for everything from cancer to the common cold."

Transgender Tragedy: This Baby Died Because the Mother's Medical Records Listed Her as Male
After the Obama administration handed down the mandate, an association of over 19,000 health care professionals, nine states, and several religious organizations filed two lawsuits against it. In December 2016, two different federal courts issued preliminary decisions ruling the policy an unlawful federal overreach and likely a violation of religious freedom.


District Judge Reed O'Connor agreed, ruling that the mandate violated the Administrative Procedures Act (APA) and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA).

Research shows that there are significant risks with sex reassignment surgery, including hearth conditions, increased cancer risk, and loss of bone density. Children with gender dysphoria (the condition of persistently identifying with the gender opposite one's biological sex) are extremely unlikely to continue in that condition after puberty. Many realize they are not transgender, but instead gay or lesbian — like detransitioner Charlotte Evans, who launched a network for formerly transgender people.

This transgender mandate, like many other Obama-era policies, aimed to use the strong arm of the state to enforce what amounts to a new belief system. While a few people have disorders of sex development, most human beings are either male or female from the moment of conception. Men and women have key biological differences from the womb, and no amount of transgender "treatments" can alter a person's DNA, which impacts his or her development throughout life.


Erasing biological sex in order to enshrine transgender identity in medical best practices has real consequences for patients. In one particularly tragic case, a pregnant woman who identified as a man went to a hospital with abdominal pain. Because she identified as male and records listed her as male, doctors discounted the idea that she could be in labor. She did not receive the care she needed and her child died. Had the medical establishment rightly categorized her as female, her baby would have survived. Yet doctors took the opposite lesson, chiding themselves for not considering the ludicrous idea that a man could be pregnant.

The Obama administration attempted to redefine the word "sex" in federal civil rights law to include gender identity, a person's internal sense of self. This is not accurate, linguistically or scientifically. Yet the Obama HHS attempted to force doctors to adopt this view, with no protections for conscientious objectors.

Judge O'Connor was right to strike down the Obama mandate, but Democrats are leaping over one another to pledge their loyalty to the transgender movement. Should a Democrat follow President Donald Trump in the White House, he or she would likely issue a new transgender mandate.

Follow Tyler O'Neil, the author of this article, on Twitter at @Tyler2ONeil.

30K Health Professionals Praise Trump for Restoring Sex Over Gender Identity in Federal Law
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 60994
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 74
Location : Wales UK

http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

OBAMA AGAIN  Empty Re: OBAMA AGAIN

Post  Admin on Fri 18 Oct 2019, 8:12 pm

https://www.conservativeinstitute.org/conservative-news/fusion-steele-dossier-obama.htm?utm_source=dc3&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=dc3-1
Fusion GPS founder says memos from Steele dossier were sent directly to Obama: Report
October 17, 2019

Fusion GPS co-founder Glenn Simpson’s new book reportedly claims that his firm was hired in the fall of 2015 by the Hillary Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee (DNC) to investigate Donald Trump — and that memos about the Christopher Steele dossier which resulted from that investigation were sent directly to then-President Barack Obama.

The money used to hire Fusion GPS was laundered through the law firm Perkins Coie, Simpson said in his soon-to-be-released book, Crime in Progress, according to investigative journalist Paul Sperry.

It is already well-documented that Obama’s Justice Department used information from the now-discredited dossier to get four warrants under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) to spy on Trump campaign official Carter Page — but how involved was Obama really in the attempt to take Trump down using phony information?
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 60994
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 74
Location : Wales UK

http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

OBAMA AGAIN  Empty Re: OBAMA AGAIN

Post  Admin on Tue 15 Oct 2019, 10:52 pm

FISA Report Will Cover MORE Than We Thought, Fox Star Says
October 15, 2019
Mgid

The FISA [Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act] abuse report is coming out soon showing all of the corrupt actions involving Obama’s FBI and DOJ made to hurt Donald Trump in the 2016 presidential election. Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz is the one releasing it. And it’s supposed to be a groundbreaking victory for Trump in exposing how filthy the Obama administration really was.

Fox personality Maria Bartiromo even claims that the report will include even MORE than just FISA abuses. She claims that she learned on her Fox News show, Sunday Morning Futures, that the report will be as thick as a “telephone book” and include tons of information.

According to the Washington Examiner:

“Fox Business anchor Maria Bartiromo says her sources are telling her an extensive report by Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz on alleged Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act abuses by the Justice Department and the FBI will be released by the end of next week.”

If true, this could indeed be a massive victory for President Trump. The more information we have on the Obama administration, the easier it will be to prove that Trump was right in claiming that Obama spied on him using the FBI. It’s only a matter of time until we learn the truth.

You can read the full report on Bartiromo’s findings here. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/maria-bartiromo-doj-inspector-general-report-due-out-friday-and-covers-more-than-just-fisa-abuse?fbclid=IwAR29HxldgwqLpWfDEThdDXc97RhmH9weaQqYwCPoXOW8uHLth8mU3XRA7mw
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 60994
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 74
Location : Wales UK

http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

OBAMA AGAIN  Empty Re: OBAMA AGAIN

Post  Admin on Sat 12 Oct 2019, 9:18 pm

https://www.conservativeinstitute.org/conservative-news/obama-divorce-tabloid-speculates.htm?utm_source=dc3&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=dc3-1

Barack and Michelle Obama could be headed for divorce, tabloid speculates
October 11, 2019
Top-selling tabloid The Globe is reporting that former President Barack Obama and his wife Michelle are consulting top-notch lawyers so they can get a “$150 million divorce.” The Obamas are said to be “feuding” because Michelle wants a celebrity lifestyle, while Barack just wants a quiet retirement
But not everyone is buying this story.
Obamas divorce hoax?
According to The Globe, Barack Obama allegedly threw his wedding ring at his wife, after which they didn’t communicate except through their “people.” He is supposedly refusing to give her alimony or child support for their daughters — both of whom are over the age of 18 — and wasn’t wearing his ring during a speech he gave on Sept. 29.
The article also alleges that Michelle Obama wants to run for president to show up Barack; at the same time, she wants to have her own talk show, like Oprah Winfrey.
Of course, while Michelle Obama could probably do just about anything she wanted to in this political climate, it would be dubious for anyone to simultaneously run for president and start up a talk show. Presidential candidates generally have to stop any ongoing television gigs and other projects to avoid conflicts of interest.
Besides all that, Michelle Obama has repeatedly denied having an interest in running for office. In an August interview, she said there was “zero chance” of her wanting back into the White House, according to The Hill.
Moreover, Gossip Cop and other fact-checking sites have said the claim that the Obamas want to divorce is false. The outlet points to sweet sentiments the Obamas posted about each other and their marriage on social media as they celebrated their anniversary on Oct. 3.
“Twenty-seven years ago, this guy promised me a life full of adventure,” Michelle Obama wrote. “I’d say he’s delivered. Here’s to our next chapter of becoming empty nesters and discovering what’s next — while still feeling the magic that brought us together all those years ago. Happy anniversary, Barack.”
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 60994
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 74
Location : Wales UK

http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

OBAMA AGAIN  Empty Re: OBAMA AGAIN

Post  Admin on Thu 10 Oct 2019, 11:20 pm

James Clapper Just Confessed – BEGS For Mercy…
October 10, 2019
Mgid
https://www.dailyconservative.com/daily-blog/james-clapper-just-confessed-begs-for-mercy.htm
Former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper just confessed on national television. He begged for mercy as the probe into the Obama Administration’s 2016 witch-hunt against then-candidate Trump heats up.

Trading Guru Reveals His Secret How to Become a Millionaire on Trading!
TradeLTD
Ads by Revcontent
Clapper said that “then commander in chief, President Obama, told us … to assemble all the reporting that we could that we had available to us” about the so-called Trump-Russia ‘collusion’ for an investigation.

Clapper dropped this bombshell on CNN, of all channels, and many are wondering whether this way his way of throwing Obama under the bus. It is now a foregone conclusion that the witch-hunt went all the way to the top.

Americans know that Democrats tried to destroy Trump before he even became president, but they couldn’t pull it off. So, they used the power of the federal government to launch a protracted war instead.

As former FBI official Peter Strzok noted in a text message, “The White House is running this.” You can’t get more definitive than this statement, and Obama himself should be forced to testify.


Learn more about RevenueStripe...
President Trump promised to drain the swamp, and that is exactly what he is working hard to do — but the likes of Obama, Clapper, and Comey won’t go without a fight. Trump is ready for them.

See the full story here. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6CuO0i9xNY0
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 60994
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 74
Location : Wales UK

http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

OBAMA AGAIN  Empty Re: OBAMA AGAIN

Post  Admin on Tue 08 Oct 2019, 9:00 pm

https://www.conservativeinstitute.org/conservative-news/book-bromance-obama-biden.htm?utm_source=dc3&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=dc3-1
New book alleges ‘bromance’ between Obama, Biden wasn’t all the media hyped it up to be
October 7, 2019

A much-ballyhooed “bromance” between former President Barack Obama and former Vice President Joe Biden may not have been as strong as the media led Americans to believe, a new book has proposed.

Newsweek reported that Steven Levingston’s new book, Barack and Joe: The Making of an Extraordinary Partnership, pointed out that Obama has refused to endorse Biden in both the 2016 and 2020 election cycles, and has been keeping his distance as Biden campaigns across the country.

Why didn’t Obama endorse Biden?
Indeed, although the media has trumpeted the bromance over the years, it wasn’t always sunshine and rainbows between the two of them. In one instance early on in the pair’s relationship, when Biden gave a long, rambling speech that frustrated Obama, the then-senator reportedly sent his aide a note that read: “Shoot. Me. Now.”

NBC News reports that another awkward moment came in 2007, when Biden, then a senator, suggested that Obama was the first “articulate” and “clean” black candidate to run for the nation’s highest office. Biden later apologized for the comment, but went on to say his remarks were taken out of context.

Levingston’s book also noted the awkwardness between the two during their presidential/vice-presidential tenure. As far as Obama’s refusal to endorse Biden in 2016, Levingston felt that it all came down to something no one could have expected: Biden is an old, white guy.

“Joe, despite his many virtues, was just another white guy, one in a long line of American presidents — hardly the symbol of the Teutonic change that Obama hoped would mark his place in the history books,” Levingston wrote.

Instead, Obama decided he wanted to hand off the presidency to another history-making candidate: Hillary Clinton. “Barack had placed his bet on Hillary, the one he believed would confirm his revolutionary stamp on American’s political culture — the first black president passing the baton to the first woman president,” Levingston suggested.

Obama didn’t count on the public’s widespread distaste for Clinton being too steep to overcome. And although 2016 saw Donald Trump — another old, white guy — take the presidency, Obama still doesn’t seem to think the Democratic Party should take what he sees as a step backward in making Biden the nominee in 2020.


What else did Obama know?
Of course, there’s another possibility for why Obama didn’t want Biden to run. Given the information that recently came to light about Biden withholding aid to Ukraine and the possible connection to his son Hunter’s dealings as a board member of a Ukrainian energy company, it’s also possible that Obama didn’t want that — or any number of other damaging pieces of information — to come to light.

Obama was masterful when he was president at getting the media to look the other way whenever he did anything potentially wrong. Fast and Furious, Benghazi, the IRS targeting of conservative groups, VA healthcare problems, and Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server were all downplayed and eventually dropped by the media in large part.

Obama does not want to see any of the skeletons in his closet dragged out to tarnish his legacy, and Biden’s candidacy represents the best chance for that happening.

But let’s face it: the Obama-Biden bromance was never all that real in the first place. And if it ever existed, it has certainly faded away by now.
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 60994
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 74
Location : Wales UK

http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

OBAMA AGAIN  Empty Re: OBAMA AGAIN

Post  Admin on Sat 05 Oct 2019, 10:09 pm

Ukraine Prosecutor CONFIRMS The Rumors – Biden Is…
October 5, 2019
Mgid

The Ukrainian prosecutor that Joe Biden got fired has now gone on record saying he was ordered to stop investigating Hunter Biden’s energy company in the months before he was fired.


Viktor Shokin said he was told in a meeting with then-Ukrainian president Petro Poroshenko that Biden was holding up one billion dollars in aid because of Shokin’s investigation into Burisma, where Hunter Biden was paid $50,000 per month and reportedly made $1.3 million in just 18 months.

“Mr. Shokin was called into Mr. Poroshenko’s office and told that the investigation into Burisma and the Managing Director where Hunter Biden is on the board, has caused Joe Biden to hold up one billion dollars in U.S. aid to Ukraine,” notes from the meeting read. Shokin also said he made requests for information about Hunter Biden, but nothing was received.

The notes were taken during a phone call with Shokin, during which two translators were used so all parties could understand each other. The notes were distributed to reporters during a White House meeting that many thought would be focused on Trump’s actions, not Biden’s.

No wonder former President Barack Obama reportedly told Joe Biden that he “didn’t have to run” for president. Biden’s candidacy now stands to leave a big stain on Obama’s White House record, even if Obama didn’t know about what was going on, which is unlikely.

Read the full story here.  
https://www.dailywire.com/news/ukraine-prosecutor-that-biden-got-fired-says-he-was-told-to-back-off-investigation-report-says?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=benshapiro
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 60994
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 74
Location : Wales UK

http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

OBAMA AGAIN  Empty Re: OBAMA AGAIN

Post  Admin on Thu 03 Oct 2019, 10:26 pm

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/09/30/book-barack-obama-does-not-endorse-another-white-guy-joe-biden/?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_term=daily&utm_campaign=20190930&utm_content=Final
Book: Barack Obama Does Not Want to Endorse ‘Just Another White Guy’ Joe Biden
3,258
Former U.S. President Barack Obama speaks at the opening of the Bits & Pretzels meetup on September 29, 2019 in Munich, Germany. The annual event brings together founders and startups from across the globe for three days of networking, talks and inspiration. during the "Bits & Pretzels Founders Festival" at …Hannes Magerstaedt/Getty Images
CHARLIE SPIERING30 Sep 2019844
2:04
Former President Barack Obama did not endorse former Vice President Joe Biden for president, according to a new book, because he did not represent the appropriate level of change that he hoped his presidential legacy would represent.
A new book claims that Obama endorsed former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton instead of Biden in 2016 because he was “just another white guy.”

“Joe, despite his many virtues, was just another white guy, one in a long line of American presidents — hardly the symbol of the Teutonic change that Obama hoped would mark his place in the history books,” wrote author Steven Levingston in a new book, according to the Daily Mail.

evingston is the nonfiction editor of the Washington Post, and has authored books about former President John F. Kennedy. His new book, Barack and Joe: The Making of an Extraordinary Partnership is scheduled for release on October 8.

“Barack had placed his bet on Hillary, the one he believed would confirm his revolutionary stamp on American’s political culture – the first black president passing the baton to the first woman president,” he wrote.

The book notes that Obama did not endorse Biden for president in 2020 either, marking a blow to his former vice president who routinely cites Obama’s legacy on the campaign trail.

Biden was also stung by the fact that Obama was meeting with potential presidential candidates such as former Rep. Robert Francis “Beto” O’Rourke, according to Livingston.

The New York Times also reported in August that Obama told Biden, “You don’t have to do this, Joe,” referring to a conversation he had with his former vice president, and asked Biden’s aids to not let the former vice president embarrass himself.

The book also details an anecdote about Obama as a newly elected senator emailing one of his advisers, “Shoot. Me. Now.” as Biden droned on during a speech.
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 60994
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 74
Location : Wales UK

http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

OBAMA AGAIN  Empty Re: OBAMA AGAIN

Post  Admin on Tue 01 Oct 2019, 10:27 pm

https://www.dailyconservative.com/daily-blog/ukraine-bombshell-barack-obama-has-been.htm
Ukraine Bombshell – Barack Obama Has Been…
September 29, 2019
Mgid
To distract from the fact that President Trump has been proven innocent of any wrongdoing by the Ukraine call transcript, Democrats are switching gears.
Now they are saying that the transcript was stored improperly. The only problem what that theory is that the Obama administration had the same policy for storage of transcripts.

The conversation was saved to a secret and highly protected server. While that sounds problematic, especially considering a certain ex-Secretary of State and her separate servers, this is nothing new.

The Obama administration also utilized this server to hold transcripts and other important pieces of information.

Of course, Democrats had no issue with Barack Obama doing this. But when Trump did the same thing suddenly it became a “problem.”
The Democrats think they are exempt from their own rules. If we are talking about legal consequences, it needs to be same for everyone.
Read the full story here.
https://www.dailywire.com/news/obama-administration-saved-call-transcripts-on-same-secret-server-as-trump-administration?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=benshapiro
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 60994
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 74
Location : Wales UK

http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

OBAMA AGAIN  Empty Re: OBAMA AGAIN

Post  Admin on Tue 01 Oct 2019, 10:02 pm

https://www.dailyconservative.com/daily-blog/ukraine-bombshell-barack-obama-has-been.htm
Ukraine Bombshell – Barack Obama Has Been…
September 29, 2019
Mgid
To distract from the fact that President Trump has been proven innocent of any wrongdoing by the Ukraine call transcript, Democrats are switching gears.
Now they are saying that the transcript was stored improperly. The only problem what that theory is that the Obama administration had the same policy for storage of transcripts.

The conversation was saved to a secret and highly protected server. While that sounds problematic, especially considering a certain ex-Secretary of State and her separate servers, this is nothing new.

The Obama administration also utilized this server to hold transcripts and other important pieces of information.

Of course, Democrats had no issue with Barack Obama doing this. But when Trump did the same thing suddenly it became a “problem.”
The Democrats think they are exempt from their own rules. If we are talking about legal consequences, it needs to be same for everyone.
Read the full story here.
https://www.dailywire.com/news/obama-administration-saved-call-transcripts-on-same-secret-server-as-trump-administration?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=benshapiro
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 60994
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 74
Location : Wales UK

http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

OBAMA AGAIN  Empty Re: OBAMA AGAIN

Post  Admin on Sat 14 Sep 2019, 10:23 pm

Obama explains why he sold out Israel – Thank God he won’t be president again
By Leah Rosenberg - September 12, 2019 7318 0
Share on Facebook
Tweet
Obama says it plain and simple. He was never and never will be a friend of Israel. Obama genuinely believes that Israel has no right to determine for itself where it ultimately sees the Land of Israel borders. Obama supports a state for Arabs west of the Jordan River and therefore pressured Israel to succumb to Arab demands. Not one word from Obama about the nature of the Arab leadership west of the Jordan river. Not one word about the strategic threats that this would pose towards the safety of millions of Jews who would live within missile range of a future Arab state.

https://israelunwired.com/obama-explains-why-he-sold-out-israel-thank-god-he-wont-be-president-again/
Boost this video to reach up to 1000 people
Arms Support for the State of Israel
The United States has NOT always supported the State of Israel with arms. It began after the Six Day War – not before. For the first 19+ years, the State of Israel procured arms via the French, via the Czechs, and nearly anyone they could buy World War II surplus arms from.

But following the Six Day War, the United States agreed for it’s own national interests to invest in supplying weapons to Israel AND to it’s Arab neighbors in order to have more leverage and control with what happens in the Middle East. Of course, this is also beneficial to weapons manufacturers in the United States. When the State of Israel began to manufacture it’s own aircraft, the Lavi, it was American businessmen, Congressmen, and Senators who bullied Israel into backing down on their own weapons production. The United States supports Israel because it is in their interest. Obama knew that he could not defeat Congress on the arms package issue. So, he allowed that to go through, but radically softened the United States stance against Iran instead. So, he weakened Israel by strengthening their enemies instead.


He was no friend and should always be remembered as a hostile President to the best friend and ally of the United States.
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 60994
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 74
Location : Wales UK

http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

OBAMA AGAIN  Empty Re: OBAMA AGAIN

Post  Admin on Wed 11 Sep 2019, 12:56 pm

Docs Show Obama State Dept's Frenzied Attempt To Undermine Trump Before Inauguration
President Barack Obama (R) welcomes President-elect Donald Trump(L)to the White House in Washington, D.C., Jan. 20, 2017.Jim Watson / AFP / Getty Images
President Barack Obama (R) welcomes President-elect Donald Trump(L)to the White House in Washington, D.C., Jan. 20, 2017. (Jim Watson / AFP / Getty Images)
https://www.westernjournal.com/obama-state-dept-frenzied/?utm_source=push&utm_medium=westernjournalism&utm_content=2019-09-10&utm_campaign=pushtraffic
By C. Douglas Golden
Published September 10, 2019 at 12:21pm

New documents released after a court battle reveal that the State Department tried to undercut the Trump administration during the transition from former President Barack Obama, according to conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch.

The Tuesday document release implicates some of the highest-ranking Democrats in Congress in the plan.

“Judicial Watch today released 90 pages of heavily redacted U.S. Department of State documents showing Obama State Department officials’ efforts to disseminate classified information to multiple U.S. Senators immediately prior to President Donald Trump’s inauguration,” the group’s media release read.

“The information, which included raw intelligence, purported to show ‘malign’ Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election. Among the senators receiving the classified documents were Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA), Sen. Ben Cardin (D-MD), and Sen. Robert Corker (R-TN).”

Corker was one of the more notable anti-Trump voices among the Republican Senate caucus; he retired in 2018.

TRENDING: Book Claims Team Trump Paid for Karen Pence's Inauguration Gown After Her Concerns About Price

The State Department has long been known as one of the more liberal corners of the U.S. government, mind you, so this isn’t a surprise. What is a surprise is how deep this goes.

“A January 13, 2017, email from Hera Abbasi, a former congressional advisor in the State Department’s Bureau of Legislative Affairs, suggests that the intelligence community was providing ‘raw intel’ to Sen. Warner,” Judicial Watch reported.

“Such an exchange almost certainly would have been coordinated by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI): ‘Yes, that is correct. Warner/raw intel stuff is going thru IC channels.’ (Abbasi previously worked in Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s office and was a 2017 Next Generation National Security Fellow at the liberal Center for a New American Security. Abbasi donated $725 to the Clinton campaign and Act Blue during the 2016 election cycle.)”

Oh, and it gets better. If you’re a Democrat, I mean.

So three days before the inauguration, the principals say this is a major issue.

“Agree this is a priority… and I don’t see why lengthy reviews are required. I would suggest we send up the things that can go immediately, and if there is any concern about specific internal documents, those be adjudicated separately and sent up as a follow-on,” Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Kathleen Kavalec’s email read.

A few days later, Naz Durakoglu, senior advisor to the Assistant Secretary for European and Eurasian Affairs, said in an email that “there is a time sensitivity to these docs.”

Think this couldn’t get any worse?

Here’s part of what’s described as a heavily redacted email by Foreign Service Officer Kerem Bilge on Jan. 13, 2017:

RELATED: Voters File Lawsuit Against California's Desperate Attempt To Hit at Trump over His Tax Returns

“**** Please clear the action memo by noon TUESDAY [Jan. 17],” he wrote.

“**** Please clear on the actual package of documents, if you have not done so already, by noon TUESDAY [Jan. 17]. [Emphasis in original
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 60994
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 74
Location : Wales UK

http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

OBAMA AGAIN  Empty Re: OBAMA AGAIN

Post  Admin on Tue 10 Sep 2019, 10:35 pm

https://gellerreport.com/2019/09/obamas-treason-against-trump.html/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=facebook
New State Department Documents Reveal Last-Minute Efforts by Obama State Department to Undermine President Trump
By Pamela Geller - on September 10, 2019
DEMOCRAT LEADERSHIP: FIFTH COLUMN
1
Facebook
Twitter
Google+
It’s bloody treason. Then and still now.

NEW STATE DEPARTMENT DOCUMENTS REVEAL LAST-MINUTE EFFORTS BY OBAMA STATE DEPARTMENT TO UNDERMINE PRESIDENT TRUMP
By: Judicial Watch, September 10, 2019:

Emails show Hillary Clinton’s supporters’ efforts to get classified documents and raw intelligence on alleged Russia involvement in 2016 election to Capitol Hill before Trump inauguration

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch today released 90 pages of heavily redacted U.S. Department of State documents showing Obama State Department officials’ efforts to disseminate classified information to multiple U.S. Senators immediately prior to President Donald Trump’s inauguration. The information, which included raw intelligence, purported to show “malign” Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election. Among the senators receiving the classified documents were Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA), Sen. Ben Cardin (D-MD), and Sen. Robert Corker (R-TN).

Judicial Watch obtained the documents through a June 2018 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit filed against the State Department after it failed to respond to a February 2018 request seeking records of the Obama State Department’s last-minute efforts to share classified information about Russia election interference issues with Democratic Senator Ben Cardin (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:18-cv-01381)).

A January 13, 2017, email from Hera Abbasi, a former congressional advisor in the State Department’s Bureau of Legislative Affairs, suggests that the intelligence community was providing “raw intel” to Sen. Warner. Such an exchange almost certainly would have been coordinated by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI): “Yes, that is correct. Warner/raw intel stuff is going thru IC channels.” (Abbasi previously worked in Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s office and was a 2017 Next Generation National Security Fellow at the liberal Center for a New American Security. Abbasi donated $725 to the Clinton campaign and Act Blue during the 2016 election cycle.)

The documents uncovered by Judicial Watch show early in the process of gathering and clearing classified information – beginning a day after Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA) formally asked Attorney General John Kerry for “intelligence products” and “raw intelligence” on Russian involvement in the 2016 election – Assistant Secretary of State Julia Frifield brings Senior Advisor and Investigations Counsel Zachary Schram into the loop in a January 5, 2017, email chain, in which she says Schram would help “figure out the best way to get these to the Hill.” Frifield was an Obama appointee who previously served as Maryland Democratic Senator Barbara Mikulski’s Chief of Staff. (Frifield contributed $2,700 to the 2016 Clinton campaign.)

On January 11, 2017, former State Department Senior Congressional Advisor Katherine Harris sends an email to Abbasi; Naz Durakoglu, who was a senior advisor to the Assistant Secretary for European and Eurasian Affairs; Kathleen Kavalec, and others: “If we are not going through our standard CDP [Collection Due Process] process, others in H need to weigh in on how to move these to the Hill.”

In emails written on January 10 and 11, 2017, from Abbasi to Durakoglu and Kavalec, Abassi expresses the need to get the documents cleared “as soon as possible (ASAP).”

On January 17, 2017, three days before Trump’s inauguration, Kavalec emails Abbasi, Durakoglu and others emphasizing, again, that getting the documents to Cardin and Warner is a priority and urges the process to be sped up:

Agree this is a priority… and I don’t see why lengthy reviews are required. I would suggest we send up the things that can go immediately, and if there is any concern about specific internal documents, those be adjudicated separately and sent up as a follow-on.

In a January 18, 2017 email from Naz Durakoglu to Elizabeth Lawrence, Abbasi, Kerem Bilge, and others regarding the processing of the request, Durakoglu writes, “there is a time sensitivity to these docs.”

Shedding additional light on possible irregularities in the release process, a January 17, 2017, email reveals that ODNI, then led by James Clapper, was involved in clearing cables for release to the Hill. State Department official Cody Walsh emails Schram and Lauren Gills that the ODNI is “fine” with the State Department “sharing … cables with the Hill.”

On January 13, 2017, at 10:27 a.m., Durakoglu emails more than a dozen State Department employees, invoking the name of then-State Department Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland to reiterate the need to accelerate the process of getting materials prepared to go to the Hill: “Hi All. This is a priority for our Assistant Secretary…Is there anything we can do to better facilitate the process?”

Two minutes later, Durakoglu emails Kerem Bilge and two others: “Where are we on clearances? Do I need to ask Toria to raise with Julia? The clock is ticking. 😊” Durakoglu, at the time, was a senior adviser to Nuland. Durakoglu currently works for The Atlantic Council. She contributed $1,600 to the Clinton campaign in 2016.

The concluding, unredacted section of an otherwise heavily redacted email sent on Friday, January 13, 2017, by former Foreign Service Officer Kerem Bilge to numerous State employees indicates the intense time pressure under which State officials were operating to beat the Inauguration-Day deadline:

THE TRUTH MUST BE TOLD
Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeard. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 60994
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 74
Location : Wales UK

http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

OBAMA AGAIN  Empty Re: OBAMA AGAIN

Post  Admin on Mon 09 Sep 2019, 7:42 pm

https://www.patriotnewsalerts.com/obama-ripped-trademark-dispute/?utm_medium=ci&utm_source=push&utm_campaign=pna
.Barack and Michelle Obama ripped for ‘deplorable behavior’ in trademark dispute
September 8, 2019 by Jerry McCormick
“When they go low, we go high” — isn’t that what Michelle Obama said? Well, the Obamas clearly have quit on that philosophy.

Barack and Michelle Obama have decided to sue to steal a trademark away from another company — and they are now facing the backlash for what one lawyer called “deplorable behavior,” according to The Hollywood Reporter.

We Go Low
The Obamas started up a film production company called Higher Ground Productions in 2016.

The problem, though, is that someone else already trademarked a similar name — and that is blocking the Obamas from securing a trademark.

From the WebPowered by ZergNet

Post Malone's $3 Million House in Utah is Built for Apocalypse

The Tragic Story of Sylvester Stallone is Just Plain Sad

Family of Tot Who Died During Cruise Makes Surprising Denial
Higher Ground Enterprises is a company run by Hanisya Massey, who has been in the business of helping authors publish e-books since 2008.

But since the Obamas have already moved forward using that production name for their new Netflix projects, they decided to file a complaint with the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office in hopes of appealing their decision — at the expense of Massey and co.

Not How It Works
When you are filing for a trademark or copyright, one of the steps that is generally performed is to do a trademark search. This should have been done prior to the Obamas ever naming their company.

Instead, they moved forward and are now trying to strip the name from a small business owner simply because they did not do their own homework.

“Instead of simply picking another name, the Obamas’ lawyers have now filed a meritless petition to cancel my client’s trademark so they can take it for themselves,” Larry Zerner, the attorney representing the current owner of the trademark, stated. “This is really deplorable behavior.”

The irony in all of this is that the name of the company is an obvious play on Michelle Obama’s quote, but the fact is, they had already filed for a trademark and were rejected.

DIY: Over 16,000 Step-by-Step Woodworking Plans. Now Build Anything Out Of Wood!
Utopian Reports
The former first lady says go high, yet she and her husband are willing to take the business identity away from an innocent small business owner.

The really sad thing in all of this is that the mainstream media is not even reporting on it. If this were President Donald Trump, you’d better believe it would be headline news.
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 60994
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 74
Location : Wales UK

http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

OBAMA AGAIN  Empty Re: OBAMA AGAIN

Post  Admin on Sun 08 Sep 2019, 9:57 pm

https://www.westernjournal.com/even-ex-obama-adviser-warning-people-joe-biden/?utm_source=push&utm_medium=westernjournalism&utm_content=2019-09-07&utm_campaign=pushtraffic
Even Ex-Obama Adviser Is Warning People About Joe Biden
By C. Douglas Golden
Published September 8, 2019 at 9:32am
Either David Axelrod is too honest or very calculating. Whatever the case may be, neither is particularly good news for Joe Biden.

Axelrod was one of the closest advisers to the president during the Obama administration. Like all former political functionaries, Axelrod has found a place in the media. Unsurprisingly, it’s at CNN, where he’s a senior political commentator and hosts a podcast called “The Axe Files.”
“The Axe” isn’t exactly a fan of “The Donald,” mind you. He (now here’s a shocker) believes he’s a conscious racist flanked by a base of voters little better than zombies. However, just because he’s not toot-tooting the Trump train doesn’t mean he can’t see the trainwreck that is the former vice president’s campaign.
In a Thursday tweet, he took aim at Biden’s gaffes and questioned whether there was something deeper at play:
David Axelrod
✔
@davidaxelrod
It’s one thing to have a well-earned rep for goofy, harmless gaffes.  It’s another if you serially distort your own record.  @JoeBiden is in danger of creating a more damaging meme.https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2019/09/joe-biden-iraq-vote-what-now.html …

When Did Joe Biden Start Believing He Had Opposed the Iraq War?
Biden’s claim to have been antiwar is even weirder and more ahistorical than it seems at first.
slate.com
3,782
2:46 AM - Sep 6, 2019
TRENDING: Biden Appears To Completely Forget About Obama, Calls George W Bush 'The Last President'

“It’s one thing to have a well-earned rep for goofy, harmless gaffes,” Axelrod tweeted.

“It’s another if you serially distort your own record. @JoeBiden is in danger of creating a more damaging meme.”

The tweet links to a Slate piece regarding what was then Biden’s latest solecism: “When Did Joe Biden Start Believing He Had Opposed the Iraq War?”

Do you think Joe Biden will be the Democrats’ 2020 nominee?
Yes No
Enter your email
 
Completing this poll entitles you to The Western Journal news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
The piece revolves around a rationale Biden gave NPR for why he supported authorizing force as a senator back in 2002. According to Biden, the reason he authorized it is because he thought it would never be used.

“[Bush] looked me in the eye in the Oval Office. He said he needed the vote to be able to get inspectors into Iraq to determine whether or not Saddam Hussein was engaged in dealing with a nuclear program,” Biden said. “He got them in and before you know it, we had ‘shock and awe.’”

“Immediately, that moment it started, I came out against the war at that moment,” he added.


Except, of course, he didn’t: “Nine months ago, I voted with my colleagues to give the president of the United States of America the authority to use force, and I would vote that way again today,” Biden told the liberal Brookings Institution during a July 31, 2003, speech.

“It was a right vote then, and it’ll be a correct vote today.”

RELATED: O'Rourke Believes Americans Will Willingly Comply with Gun Confiscation, Won't Need Police

There are other inconsistencies in this story, which Ben Mathis-Lilley lays out fairly well in his Slate piece. He notes that Biden seems to have changed his opinion when George W. Bush’s poll numbers “went underwater for good.”

This distortion doesn’t come in a vacuum, of course, as Biden’s gaffes seldom do. There was also the war story gaffe, the one where The Washington Post discovered that a very moving story he told about an Afghan War hero was also very false.

“Biden got the time period, the location, the heroic act, the type of medal, the military branch and the rank of the recipient, as well as his own role in the ceremony” incorrect, The Post reported.

Biden’s “apology” was one of the “sorry not sorry” variety: “The central point is it was absolutely accurate what I said … The story was that he refused the medal because the fella he tried to save, and risked his life saving, died. That’s the beginning, middle and end.”

And as we all know, Uncle Joe chooses truth over facts.

As Mike Brest notes over at the Washington Examiner, Axelrod wasn’t just another employee over at the Obama White House. He was key in helping Obama choose Biden as his running mate. He worked closely with him for eight years. If he’s noting the fact that Biden isn’t exactly living his best life at the moment, that’s pretty significant news.


Biden’s still ahead in the polls, but the gaffes are getting more serious. It’s not just him saying how he loves the “town” of Vermont when he’s in New Hampshire anymore. This is Neil Kinnock territory. If you’ve forgotten who that is, don’t worry. I get the feeling Joe Biden has, too. And that’s why even “The Axe” is getting worried.

We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 60994
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 74
Location : Wales UK

http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

OBAMA AGAIN  Empty Re: OBAMA AGAIN

Post  Admin on Sun 08 Sep 2019, 8:48 pm

https://www.patriotnewsalerts.com/obama-appointment-supreme-court/?utm_medium=ci&utm_source=push&utm_campaign=pna
Asked if he would nominate Obama for the Supreme Court, Biden says ‘yes’
September 7, 2019 by Jerry McCormick
Joe Biden made another play to win over a few more votes this week while making an appearance on “The Late Show with Stephen Colbert.”

When asked by Colbert if he would nominate Barack Obama to the Supreme Court, Biden responded, “Hell … yes.”

“I don’t think he’d do it,” he added, but agreed with Colbert that Obama would be qualified for the position. Watch below:

Pandering for Votes
If there is one thing we have found out about Biden during this presidential campaign, it is that he loves to bring up Barack Obama as much as possible.

From the WebPowered by ZergNet

Serena Williams Is Speaking Out About Her Sister's Murder

Why Melania Trump Has Us More Than a Bit Worried

Another Bizarre Painting Found at Epstein's New Mexico Ranch
Colbert opened the door for Biden to drop his name, asking him if he called his former boss for advice during this campaign.

Biden, of course, said he talks to Obama all the time, the most recent conversation taking place about three or four weeks ago. That must have been the last time Obama told him he really didn’t have to run for office to prove anything to anyone.

Biden also stated that he had asked Michelle Obama to be his vice president, which elicted a rousing cheer, but Biden finally revealed he was only joking.

Not Really Qualified
Saying Obama is qualified for the Supreme Court, though, is a bit of a stretch. Obama is listed as a Constitutional professor at Chicago University, but he has proven during his time as president he has little respect for the Constitution itself.

One need only look at DACA to prove that Obama has no idea what the Constitution allows and does not allow.

If you need more proof, look at how he sidestepped legislative procedures to push through both the Iran deal and Obamacare.

Can you imagine the disaster the Supreme Court would become if someone as far left as Obama was allowed to sit on the bench for the next three decades?

If Biden was truly serious about nominating Obama to the Supreme Court, he has provided us with more than enough proof that he is not fit for the office.
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 60994
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 74
Location : Wales UK

http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

OBAMA AGAIN  Empty Re: OBAMA AGAIN

Post  Admin on Fri 06 Sep 2019, 9:01 pm

Top Democrat walks back support for Barack Obama: ‘He made me promises, which he broke’
September 5, 2019 by Jerry McCormick
Harvard University Law Professor Alan Dershowitz is done with former President Barack Obama.
https://www.patriotnewsalerts.com/top-democrat-walks-back/?utm_medium=ci&utm_source=push&utm_campaign=pna
According to the high-profile attorney and legal pundit, Dershowitz broke his ties with Obama because the former president lied to him about his promise to stand by Israel.

“He made me promises, which he broke, and I broke my relationship with President Obama,” Dershowitz said, according to One America News Network (OANN).

Dershowitz is a lifelong Democrat and was a self-admitted Obama supporter during the 2008 election season. This was in part because he and Obama had discussed at length that Obama would stand by Israel, Dershowitz said in a recent interview.

However, according to Dershowitz, in one of Obama’s last acts as president, he turned on Israel, stabbing both Dershowitz — and the Jewish state — in the back on his way out the door.

That decision was to sit on the sidelines while the U.N. condemned Israel for occupying the Western Wall, a place considered to be the holiest place in all of Judaism.

And after Obama turned his back on Israel, Dershowitz turned his back on Obama.

The Great Divide
The actions of Obama continue to linger in the Democratic Party. Never before have we seen such a level of disrespect toward one of our major allies, but several members of the so-called “Squad” have backed organizations and legislation that openly oppose Israel.

The most recent example is a publicity stunt by Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) and Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-MI), who attempted to visit Israel.

The two were banned after Israel saw their agenda, which the country believed amounted to nothing more than plans to rail against Israel and promote Palestine.

Obama’s actions were clearly infectious, and have taken hold in the younger generation of Democrats. It is for that very reason that people like Dershowitz have walked to the middle of the aisle, and for the first time ever, will consider voting for Republicans come Election Day 2020.
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 60994
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 74
Location : Wales UK

http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

OBAMA AGAIN  Empty Re: OBAMA AGAIN

Post  Admin on Tue 03 Sep 2019, 7:24 pm

https://www.jihadwatch.org/2019/09/suspended-years-ago-by-obama-trial-date-of-9-11-jihad-plotters-finally-set-for-2021
Delayed by Obama, Trial of 9/11 Plotters Finally Set for 2021
SEP 2, 2019 12:00 PM BY ROBERT SPENCER 25 COMMENTS
My latest in PJ Media:

For those of you who weren’t yet born on September 11, 2001, on that day Islamic jihadis killed nearly 3,000 Americans in attacks on the Twin Towers and the Pentagon. A fourth plane was set to murder even more people by crashing into another landmark in Washington, but it was downed in Pennsylvania by its passengers in order to thwart the jihadis’ plans. Even those who don’t remember the day have probably learned about it in school, but few people are aware of the fact that the surviving plotters have not yet been brought to trial.

That is now set to change on January 11, 2021, the day that Air Force Colonel W. Shane Cohen has just set the trial to begin at Camp Justice, at Guantánamo Bay in Cuba.

Why has it taken nearly twenty years for these jihadis to face justice? Largely because of Barack Obama.

The trial will take place nearly nine years after the plotters – Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, Walid bin Attash, Ramzi bin al-Shibh, Ammar al-Baluchi, and Mustafa al-Hawsawi – were arraigned. The Daily Mail reported that “Cohen’s announcement marks the first time that a trial judge in the case actually established a date. Prosecutors had tried to get the ball rolling with two previous judges after the 2012 arraignment.”

The trial will also begin nearly twelve years after Khalid Shaikh Mohammed and the others for all intents and purposes admitted their role in the 9/11 jihad attacks, penning a lengthy Islamic defense for their actions in which they never denied plotting the hijacking of planes in order to commit mass murder of American civilians, but justified their actions by claiming that the U.S. was the greater terrorist. They signed the document “the 9/11 Shura Council.”

This was not a document obtained under torture, but a closely reasoned explanation of why the 9/11 attacks were justified from the standpoint of Islamic doctrine and belief….

There is much more. Read the rest here.

Share this:
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 60994
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 74
Location : Wales UK

http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

OBAMA AGAIN  Empty Re: OBAMA AGAIN

Post  Admin on Tue 27 Aug 2019, 11:20 pm

https://www.patriotnewsalerts.com/internet-blasts-obamas-mansion/?utm_medium=ci&utm_source=push&utm_campaign=pna
Internet blasts Barack and Michelle Obama for purchasing Martha’s Vineyard mansion
August 26, 2019 by Jerry McCormick
For people who preach about income equality and climate change, the Obamas have a funny way of showing their concern.

TMZ recently reported that the Obamas are about to buy a $15 million oceanfront property on Martha’s Vineyard, and internet trolls could not wait to point out the numerous ironies of this purchase.

What About Climate Change?
According to climate change doomsayers, we have a dozen years before the ocean starts to swallow us all up. If someone is a true believer in climate change, they would not invest in oceanfront property, right?

Ironically, that is exactly where the mansion that Obamas are considering purchasing sits. If they truly thought these major problems were on the horizon, why would they be sinking so much money into a property that is about to fall into the ocean?

The following tweet is typical of what the Obamas received on this front:
Amy Curtis
@RantyAmyCurtis
 If I genuinely believed in 12 years coastal areas would be under water, I wouldn’t by a $15 million mansion on...Martha’s Vineyard. 
Call me crazy, but it doesn’t seem like Obama is taking climate change all that seriously. https://twitter.com/tmz/status/1164435551811801088
TMZ
✔
@TMZ
Barack and Michelle Obama Buying Mega-Mansion in Martha's Vineyard http://dlvr.it/RBg5xX 
18K
1:52 AM - Aug 23, 2019 · Milwaukee, WI
Twitter Ads info and privacy
7,598 people are talking about this
What About Income Equality?
When Barack Obama took office, the couple had a net worth of about $1.5 million. The only reason it was that high was because of book advances they had reportedly received.
Now, Obama alone is alleged to have a net worth of more than $40. Together, the couple is reported to have a net worth of more than $100 million.
Adam Ford, who founded the satire site Babylon Bee, also questioned why Obama is not living up to his own expectations of people spreading their wealth around at a certain point.
Adam Ford
@Adam4d
 Obama, 2008: "When you spread the wealth around, it's good for everybody"
Obama, 2010: "At a certain point, you've made enough money"
Obama, 2019: "I'll take the $15 million Martha's Vineyard mansion on 29 beachfront acres" https://twitter.com/TMZ/status/1164435551811801088
TMZ
✔
@TMZ
Barack and Michelle Obama Buying Mega-Mansion in Martha's Vineyard http://dlvr.it/RBg5xX 
13.8K
1:32 PM - Aug 22, 2019
Twitter Ads info and privacy
5,949 people are talking about this
The questions Ford put to Obama could be put to virtually every high-profile Democrat today.
Joe Biden became a very rich man after leaving office. Bernie Sanders is now a multi-millionaire who refuses to spread his wealth around, even though he wants to implement a socialist agenda here in the United States.
The list goes on and on, with politicians like Maxine Waters and Nancy Pelosi having accumulated personal fortunes while serving in Congress.
All these Democrats talk a great game about sharing the wealth and preaching the end of times, but very few of them actually walk the walk to prove they actually believe the nonsense they are spewing, including the golden boy of the Democratic Party, Barack Obama.
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 60994
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 74
Location : Wales UK

http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

OBAMA AGAIN  Empty Re: OBAMA AGAIN

Post  Admin on Sun 25 Aug 2019, 9:18 pm

https://www.conservativeinstitute.org/conservative-news/biden-question-assassination-obama.htm
Biden puzzles audience with bizarre question: Imagine if Obama had been assassinated
August 24, 2019

Democratic presidential hopeful Joe Biden just keeps delivering.

This time, the gaffe-prone former vice president asked his audience to contemplate the hypothetical assassination of former President Barack Obama. 

What if . . .
This all occurred at a town hall event in New Hampshire just before the weekend. The focus of the get-together was supposed to be healthcare, but Biden, unsurprisingly, veered off-script.

“I have one hero who was my dad, but I have two political heroes were Martin Luther King and Bobby Kennedy,” said Biden, who recently claimed inaccurately that both men were killed in the late 1970s. “My senior semester they were both shot and killed.”

What came next is what has everyone scratching their heads.

“Imagine what would have happened if, God forbid, Barack Obama had been assassinated after becoming the de facto nominee,” Biden asked. “What would have happened in America?”

Context?
It’s unclear exactly what he meant, but Biden may have been bringing this up in order to illustrate his own political awakening in the 1960s and 1970s. These decades were a chaotic time in America, which seems to be one of the things that Biden was trying to emphasize.

“An entire generation was energized,” he recalled. “We finally finished the Voting Rights Act. We finally got the Civil Rights Act back on the road.”

The vice president also brought up his role in furthering women’s rights, which he claims earned him the reputation of being gay.

“We finally were in a position where we started to begin the women’s movement and began to treat women — I remember because I was such a big supporter of the E.R.A,” said Biden. “In 1972, quote — to show you how things have changed, thank God — ‘Well, you know why Biden is for the E.R.A., he’s probably gay.’ Not a joke.”

On a roll
This is just the latest of several Biden gaffes made just over the past month. Two others were his remark that “poor kids are just as bright and just as talented as white kids,” and his claim that he was vice president during the Parkland, Florida, school shooting in February 2018 (Biden left office in 2017.)

Nonetheless, the former vice president is still leading the crowd of Democrats vying for the right to go up against President Donald Trump in 2020.
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 60994
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 74
Location : Wales UK

http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

OBAMA AGAIN  Empty Re: OBAMA AGAIN

Post  Admin on Sat 24 Aug 2019, 8:26 pm

Report: The Obamas are buying a $15M estate
August 23, 2019 by Jerry McCormick
The Obamas aren’t even trying to hide it anymore. Being in politics has made them elitists.
https://www.patriotnewsalerts.com/report-obamas-buying-million/?utm_medium=ci&utm_source=push&utm_campaign=pna
The former president who was once worried about getting his credit card declined is now reportedly about to purchase a multi-million dollar estate on the oceanfront at Martha’s Vineyard.

It Pays to be President
Just prior to running for President, Obama’s net worth was estimated to be around $1.3 million, but that was believed to mostly be due to book advances.

Just prior to Obama’s birthday this year, his net worth was reported at roughly $40 million. That is an increase of more than 30 times his net worth in less than three years after having left office.

Obama followed the same game plan as the Clintons did. When Bill Clinton left office, he was reportedly millions of dollars in debt.

Today, the Clintons are very conservatively estimated to be worth about $100 million together, a figure that continues to increase with every new book deal and speaking engagement.

Living the High Life
The Obamas have not been shy about spending their money, either. After all, their bank account seemingly has an endless stream of money with book deals and speaking engagements on the horizon.

After Obama left office, they bought a D.C. mansion worth almost $9 million.

Now, they apparently have a bid in for the summer home of Boston Celtic’s co-owner Wyc Grousbeck. The Obamas reportedly stayed at the Martha’s Vineyard property during the summer and decided to buy it.

While the property is currently valued just shy of $15 million, Obama is reportedly getting the property for about a million less. I guess that is the price of doing business with the darling of the Democrat party.

The mansion is located on 29 acres of beachfront property and is about 6,900 sq. ft.

It has about everything one could ever hope for, so the former president should be more than comfortable living out his retirement years there. In fact, the taxpayer check he gets every year for a little more than $200,000 should be plenty to cover the utilities for the year.
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 60994
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 74
Location : Wales UK

http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

OBAMA AGAIN  Empty Re: OBAMA AGAIN

Post  Admin on Mon 19 Aug 2019, 10:52 am

Report: Obama Warned Biden — ‘You Don’t Have to Do This, Joe’
2,485
President Barack Obama listens to Vice President Joe Biden make remarks before signing the 21st Century Cures Act, Tuesday, Dec. 13, 2016, in the South Court Auditorium in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building on the White House complex in Washington. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais
JOSHUA CAPLAN16 Aug 20191,741
4:12
Former President Barack Obama reportedly wasn’t particularly sold on the idea of Joe Biden, his vice president for eight years, mounting his own bid for the White House in 2020.
“You don’t have to do this, Joe, you really don’t,” Obama told Biden before the 76-year-old formally launched his campaign in April, according to the New York Times.
“Mr. Biden — who thinks he could have defeated Donald Trump four years ago — responded by telling Mr. Obama he could never forgive himself if he turned down a second shot at Mr. Trump,” the Times reports.
The Times states Obama huddled with top Biden aides in March to implore they insure that the former vice president does not “damage his legacy” or “embarrass himself.”
The newspaper further reports Obama and Biden met over lunch last, where the former president urged the White House hopeful to recruit fresher faces to his campaign. “He has communicated his frustration that Mr. Biden’s closest advisers are too old and out of touch with the current political climate — urging him to include more younger aides,” the Times said.

MORE https://www.breitbart.com/2020-election/2019/08/16/report-obama-warned-biden-you-dont-have-to-do-this-joe/?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_term=daily&utm_campaign=20190816&utm_content=Final
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 60994
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 74
Location : Wales UK

http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

OBAMA AGAIN  Empty Re: OBAMA AGAIN

Post  Admin on Sat 17 Aug 2019, 9:17 pm

https://www.patriotnewsalerts.com/obama-security-adviser-comes/?utm_medium=ci&utm_source=push&utm_campaign=pna
Obama National Security adviser comes under heightened scrutiny for the 2017 ‘unmasking’ of Trump officials
August 16, 2019 by Jerry McCormick
In the final days of Barack Obama’s presidency, numerous Trump campaign officials were “unmasked” by then-National Security adviser Susan Rice.

Now, it seems quite clear that the move was both unprecedented and politically motivated, according to One America News Network (OAN).

Peeling off the mask
Typically, during investigations as elaborate and secretive as the one into alleged collusion between the 2016 Trump campaign team and Russia, the identities of individuals being probed are protected.

This is done to protect the individual from being scrutinized prior to the investigation being completed, and to prevent them from being falsely accused, particularly if no indictment ever materializes.

Generally speaking, the number of people who can “unmask” a protected individual is kept to a minimum. However, during the latter part of the Obama administration, all of those protocols seemed to change.

Not only were more officials given the authority to “unmask” the subjects of federal probes, but Trump officials were also unmasked for what seemed to be political reasons, according to OAN.

Take a look:
Breaking it down
At the time of the unmasking by Rice, the Obama administration was investigating back-channel communications between the Trump campaign and the United Arab Emirates. Suspicions had started to arise when Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed al-Nahyan came to New York in December 2016.

Since UAE diplomats did not notify the United States of his travel, as is customary, everyone’s ears went up. So in early 2017, Rice requested that Americans in a related classified report be unmasked.

The overall concern was that the UAE was setting up back-channel communications between Russia and the Trump campaign. But based on the reports of UAE officials, who stated the meeting was nothing more than getting the president-elect’s “view of the region and what the U.S. role should be,” Rice’s unmasking seems completely inappropriate.

Now the question remains: What else did the Obama administration do wrong?
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 60994
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 74
Location : Wales UK

http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

OBAMA AGAIN  Empty Re: OBAMA AGAIN

Post  Admin on Sat 17 Aug 2019, 3:13 pm

https://www.patriotnewsalerts.com/obama-security-adviser-comes/
Obama National Security adviser comes under heightened scrutiny for the 2017 ‘unmasking’ of Trump officials
August 16, 2019 by Jerry McCormick
In the final days of Barack Obama’s presidency, numerous Trump campaign officials were “unmasked” by then-National Security adviser Susan Rice.


Now, it seems quite clear that the move was both unprecedented and politically motivated, according to One America News Network (OAN).
Peeling off the mask
Typically, during investigations as elaborate and secretive as the one into alleged collusion between the 2016 Trump campaign team and Russia, the identities of individuals being probed are protected.


This is done to protect the individual from being scrutinized prior to the investigation being completed, and to prevent them from being falsely accused, particularly if no indictment ever materializes.


Generally speaking, the number of people who can “unmask” a protected individual is kept to a minimum. However, during the latter part of the Obama administration, all of those protocols seemed to change.


Not only were more officials given the authority to “unmask” the subjects of federal probes, but Trump officials were also unmasked for what seemed to be political reasons, according to OAN.


Take a look:
Breaking it down
At the time of the unmasking by Rice, the Obama administration was investigating back-channel communications between the Trump campaign and the United Arab Emirates. Suspicions had started to arise when Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed al-Nahyan came to New York in December 2016.


Since UAE diplomats did not notify the United States of his travel, as is customary, everyone’s ears went up. So in early 2017, Rice requested that Americans in a related classified report be unmasked.


The overall concern was that the UAE was setting up back-channel communications between Russia and the Trump campaign. But based on the reports of UAE officials, who stated the meeting was nothing more than getting the president-elect’s “view of the region and what the U.S. role should be,” Rice’s unmasking seems completely inappropriate.


Now the question remains: What else did the Obama administration do wrong?
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 60994
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 74
Location : Wales UK

http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

OBAMA AGAIN  Empty Re: OBAMA AGAIN

Post  Admin on Thu 15 Aug 2019, 10:45 pm

Thomas W. Ahlf is with Lana Henderson.
July 21, 2015 at 4:17 PM
Quit trashing Obama's accomplishments. He has done more than any other President before him. Here is a list of his impressive accomplishments:

1. First President to be photographed smoking a joint. 
2. First President to apply for college aid as a foreign student, then deny he was a foreigner. 
3. First President to have a social security number from a state he has never lived in. 
4. First President to preside over a cut to the credit-rating of the United States. 
5. First President to violate the War Powers Act. 
6. First President to be held in contempt of court for illegally obstructing oil drilling in the Gulf of Mexico. 
7. First President to require all Americans to purchase a product from a third party. 
8. First President to spend a trillion dollars on "shovel-ready" jobs when there was no such thing as "shovel-ready" jobs. 
9. First President to abrogate bankruptcy law to turn over control of companies to his union supporters. 
10. First President to by-pass Congress and implement the Dream Act through executive fiat. 
11. First President to order a secret amnesty program that stopped the deportation of illegal immigrants across the U.S., including those with criminal convictions. 
12. First President to demand a company hand-over $20 billion to one of his political appointees. 
13. First President to tell a CEO of a major corporation (Chrysler) to resign. 
14. First President to terminate America’s ability to put a man in space. 
15. First President to cancel the National Day of Prayer and to say that America is no longer a Christian nation. 
16. First President to have a law signed by an auto-pen without being present. 
17. First President to arbitrarily declare an existing law unconstitutional and refuse to enforce it. 
18. First President to threaten insurance companies if they publicly spoke out on the reasons for their rate increases. 
19. First President to tell a major manufacturing company in which state it is allowed to locate a factory. 
20. First President to file lawsuits against the states he swore an oath to protect (AZ, WI, OH, IN). 
21. First President to withdraw an existing coal permit that had been properly issued years ago. 
22. First President to actively try to bankrupt an American industry (coal). 
23. First President to fire an inspector general of AmeriCorps for catching one of his friends in a corruption case. 
24. First President to appoint 45 czars to replace elected officials in his office. 
25. First President to surround himself with radical left wing anarchists. 
26. First President to golf more than 150 separate times in his five years in office. 
27. First President to hide his birth, medical, educational and travel records. 
28. First President to win a Nobel Peace Prize for doing NOTHING to earn it. 
29. First President to go on multiple "global apology tours" and concurrent "insult our friends" tours. 
30. First President to go on over 17 lavish vacations, in addition to date nights and Wednesday evening White House parties for his friends paid for by the taxpayers. 
31. First President to have personal servants (taxpayer funded) for his wife. 
32. First President to keep a dog trainer on retainer for $102,000 a year at taxpayer expense. 
33. First President to fly in a personal trainer from Chicago at least once a week at taxpayer expense. 
34. First President to repeat the Quran and tell us the early morning call of the Azan (Islamic call to worship) is the most beautiful sound on earth. 
35. First President to side with a foreign nation over one of the American 50 states (Mexico vs Arizona). 
36. First President to tell the military men and women that they should pay for their own private insurance because they "volunteered to go to war and knew the consequences." 
37. Then he was the First President to tell the members of the military that THEY were UNPATRIOTIC for balking at the last suggestion.

I feel much better now. I had been under the impression he hadn't been doing ANYTHING... Such an accomplished individual... in the eyes of the ignorant maybe.!.
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 60994
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 74
Location : Wales UK

http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

OBAMA AGAIN  Empty Re: OBAMA AGAIN

Post  Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 1 of 2 1, 2  Next

Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum