Who is online?
In total there are 28 users online :: 0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 28 Guests :: 1 Bot

None

[ View the whole list ]


Most users ever online was 115 on Wed 03 Jul 2019, 3:20 pm
Latest topics
» Gatestone Institute
OBAMA AGAIN  - Page 2 EmptyToday at 2:10 pm by Admin

» BREITBART NEWS
OBAMA AGAIN  - Page 2 EmptyToday at 1:18 pm by Admin

» Breaking Bombshell: Elizabeth Warren’s Son-in-Law Produced Film Funded by Iranian Government 55,241
OBAMA AGAIN  - Page 2 EmptyToday at 1:15 pm by Admin

»  Impeachment Hearing 609
OBAMA AGAIN  - Page 2 EmptyToday at 12:56 pm by Admin

» OBAMA AGAIN
OBAMA AGAIN  - Page 2 EmptyToday at 12:53 pm by Admin

» PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP
OBAMA AGAIN  - Page 2 EmptyToday at 12:50 pm by Admin

» First Lady Melania Trump
OBAMA AGAIN  - Page 2 EmptyToday at 12:47 pm by Admin

» ISRAEL VIDEO'S VARIOUS COVERAGES
OBAMA AGAIN  - Page 2 EmptyYesterday at 11:45 pm by Admin

» WHAT HAPPENS WHEN A CHRISTIAN DIES?
OBAMA AGAIN  - Page 2 EmptyYesterday at 11:22 pm by Admin

» JIHAD WATCH
OBAMA AGAIN  - Page 2 EmptyYesterday at 11:13 pm by Admin

» BIRTH PANGS – Series of Powerful Earthquakes Volcano's Strike Around the Globe
OBAMA AGAIN  - Page 2 EmptyYesterday at 10:21 pm by Admin

» ENDTIME HEADLINES
OBAMA AGAIN  - Page 2 EmptyYesterday at 9:05 pm by Admin

» AISH
OBAMA AGAIN  - Page 2 EmptyYesterday at 8:41 pm by Admin

» BIBLE STUDY on VERSE
OBAMA AGAIN  - Page 2 EmptyYesterday at 8:33 pm by Admin

»  HONEST REPORTING Defending Israel from Media Bias plz read REGULAR UPDATES
OBAMA AGAIN  - Page 2 EmptyYesterday at 7:49 pm by Admin

» ATLAS SHRUGS - PAMELA GELLER
OBAMA AGAIN  - Page 2 EmptyYesterday at 7:39 pm by Admin

» Rep. Ilhan Omar AOC SQUAD must go: READ MORE
OBAMA AGAIN  - Page 2 EmptyYesterday at 7:38 pm by Admin

» Questions about Heaven
OBAMA AGAIN  - Page 2 EmptyYesterday at 6:57 pm by Admin

» R.D SOUZA Saved by faith
OBAMA AGAIN  - Page 2 EmptyYesterday at 6:41 pm by Admin

» NUGGET Today's Devotional
OBAMA AGAIN  - Page 2 EmptyYesterday at 6:40 pm by Admin

Navigation
 Portal
 Index
 Memberlist
 Profile
 FAQ
 Search

OBAMA AGAIN

Page 2 of 3 Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

Go down

OBAMA AGAIN  - Page 2 Empty Re: OBAMA AGAIN

Post  Admin on Thu 03 Oct 2019, 10:26 pm

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/09/30/book-barack-obama-does-not-endorse-another-white-guy-joe-biden/?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_term=daily&utm_campaign=20190930&utm_content=Final
Book: Barack Obama Does Not Want to Endorse ‘Just Another White Guy’ Joe Biden
3,258
Former U.S. President Barack Obama speaks at the opening of the Bits & Pretzels meetup on September 29, 2019 in Munich, Germany. The annual event brings together founders and startups from across the globe for three days of networking, talks and inspiration. during the "Bits & Pretzels Founders Festival" at …Hannes Magerstaedt/Getty Images
CHARLIE SPIERING30 Sep 2019844
2:04
Former President Barack Obama did not endorse former Vice President Joe Biden for president, according to a new book, because he did not represent the appropriate level of change that he hoped his presidential legacy would represent.
A new book claims that Obama endorsed former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton instead of Biden in 2016 because he was “just another white guy.”

“Joe, despite his many virtues, was just another white guy, one in a long line of American presidents — hardly the symbol of the Teutonic change that Obama hoped would mark his place in the history books,” wrote author Steven Levingston in a new book, according to the Daily Mail.

evingston is the nonfiction editor of the Washington Post, and has authored books about former President John F. Kennedy. His new book, Barack and Joe: The Making of an Extraordinary Partnership is scheduled for release on October 8.

“Barack had placed his bet on Hillary, the one he believed would confirm his revolutionary stamp on American’s political culture – the first black president passing the baton to the first woman president,” he wrote.

The book notes that Obama did not endorse Biden for president in 2020 either, marking a blow to his former vice president who routinely cites Obama’s legacy on the campaign trail.

Biden was also stung by the fact that Obama was meeting with potential presidential candidates such as former Rep. Robert Francis “Beto” O’Rourke, according to Livingston.

The New York Times also reported in August that Obama told Biden, “You don’t have to do this, Joe,” referring to a conversation he had with his former vice president, and asked Biden’s aids to not let the former vice president embarrass himself.

The book also details an anecdote about Obama as a newly elected senator emailing one of his advisers, “Shoot. Me. Now.” as Biden droned on during a speech.
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 62787
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 74
Location : Wales UK

http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

OBAMA AGAIN  - Page 2 Empty Re: OBAMA AGAIN

Post  Admin on Tue 01 Oct 2019, 10:27 pm

https://www.dailyconservative.com/daily-blog/ukraine-bombshell-barack-obama-has-been.htm
Ukraine Bombshell – Barack Obama Has Been…
September 29, 2019
Mgid
To distract from the fact that President Trump has been proven innocent of any wrongdoing by the Ukraine call transcript, Democrats are switching gears.
Now they are saying that the transcript was stored improperly. The only problem what that theory is that the Obama administration had the same policy for storage of transcripts.

The conversation was saved to a secret and highly protected server. While that sounds problematic, especially considering a certain ex-Secretary of State and her separate servers, this is nothing new.

The Obama administration also utilized this server to hold transcripts and other important pieces of information.

Of course, Democrats had no issue with Barack Obama doing this. But when Trump did the same thing suddenly it became a “problem.”
The Democrats think they are exempt from their own rules. If we are talking about legal consequences, it needs to be same for everyone.
Read the full story here.
https://www.dailywire.com/news/obama-administration-saved-call-transcripts-on-same-secret-server-as-trump-administration?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=benshapiro
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 62787
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 74
Location : Wales UK

http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

OBAMA AGAIN  - Page 2 Empty Re: OBAMA AGAIN

Post  Admin on Tue 01 Oct 2019, 10:02 pm

https://www.dailyconservative.com/daily-blog/ukraine-bombshell-barack-obama-has-been.htm
Ukraine Bombshell – Barack Obama Has Been…
September 29, 2019
Mgid
To distract from the fact that President Trump has been proven innocent of any wrongdoing by the Ukraine call transcript, Democrats are switching gears.
Now they are saying that the transcript was stored improperly. The only problem what that theory is that the Obama administration had the same policy for storage of transcripts.

The conversation was saved to a secret and highly protected server. While that sounds problematic, especially considering a certain ex-Secretary of State and her separate servers, this is nothing new.

The Obama administration also utilized this server to hold transcripts and other important pieces of information.

Of course, Democrats had no issue with Barack Obama doing this. But when Trump did the same thing suddenly it became a “problem.”
The Democrats think they are exempt from their own rules. If we are talking about legal consequences, it needs to be same for everyone.
Read the full story here.
https://www.dailywire.com/news/obama-administration-saved-call-transcripts-on-same-secret-server-as-trump-administration?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=benshapiro
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 62787
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 74
Location : Wales UK

http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

OBAMA AGAIN  - Page 2 Empty Re: OBAMA AGAIN

Post  Admin on Sat 14 Sep 2019, 10:23 pm

Obama explains why he sold out Israel – Thank God he won’t be president again
By Leah Rosenberg - September 12, 2019 7318 0
Share on Facebook
Tweet
Obama says it plain and simple. He was never and never will be a friend of Israel. Obama genuinely believes that Israel has no right to determine for itself where it ultimately sees the Land of Israel borders. Obama supports a state for Arabs west of the Jordan River and therefore pressured Israel to succumb to Arab demands. Not one word from Obama about the nature of the Arab leadership west of the Jordan river. Not one word about the strategic threats that this would pose towards the safety of millions of Jews who would live within missile range of a future Arab state.

https://israelunwired.com/obama-explains-why-he-sold-out-israel-thank-god-he-wont-be-president-again/
Boost this video to reach up to 1000 people
Arms Support for the State of Israel
The United States has NOT always supported the State of Israel with arms. It began after the Six Day War – not before. For the first 19+ years, the State of Israel procured arms via the French, via the Czechs, and nearly anyone they could buy World War II surplus arms from.

But following the Six Day War, the United States agreed for it’s own national interests to invest in supplying weapons to Israel AND to it’s Arab neighbors in order to have more leverage and control with what happens in the Middle East. Of course, this is also beneficial to weapons manufacturers in the United States. When the State of Israel began to manufacture it’s own aircraft, the Lavi, it was American businessmen, Congressmen, and Senators who bullied Israel into backing down on their own weapons production. The United States supports Israel because it is in their interest. Obama knew that he could not defeat Congress on the arms package issue. So, he allowed that to go through, but radically softened the United States stance against Iran instead. So, he weakened Israel by strengthening their enemies instead.


He was no friend and should always be remembered as a hostile President to the best friend and ally of the United States.
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 62787
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 74
Location : Wales UK

http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

OBAMA AGAIN  - Page 2 Empty Re: OBAMA AGAIN

Post  Admin on Wed 11 Sep 2019, 12:56 pm

Docs Show Obama State Dept's Frenzied Attempt To Undermine Trump Before Inauguration
President Barack Obama (R) welcomes President-elect Donald Trump(L)to the White House in Washington, D.C., Jan. 20, 2017.Jim Watson / AFP / Getty Images
President Barack Obama (R) welcomes President-elect Donald Trump(L)to the White House in Washington, D.C., Jan. 20, 2017. (Jim Watson / AFP / Getty Images)
https://www.westernjournal.com/obama-state-dept-frenzied/?utm_source=push&utm_medium=westernjournalism&utm_content=2019-09-10&utm_campaign=pushtraffic
By C. Douglas Golden
Published September 10, 2019 at 12:21pm

New documents released after a court battle reveal that the State Department tried to undercut the Trump administration during the transition from former President Barack Obama, according to conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch.

The Tuesday document release implicates some of the highest-ranking Democrats in Congress in the plan.

“Judicial Watch today released 90 pages of heavily redacted U.S. Department of State documents showing Obama State Department officials’ efforts to disseminate classified information to multiple U.S. Senators immediately prior to President Donald Trump’s inauguration,” the group’s media release read.

“The information, which included raw intelligence, purported to show ‘malign’ Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election. Among the senators receiving the classified documents were Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA), Sen. Ben Cardin (D-MD), and Sen. Robert Corker (R-TN).”

Corker was one of the more notable anti-Trump voices among the Republican Senate caucus; he retired in 2018.

TRENDING: Book Claims Team Trump Paid for Karen Pence's Inauguration Gown After Her Concerns About Price

The State Department has long been known as one of the more liberal corners of the U.S. government, mind you, so this isn’t a surprise. What is a surprise is how deep this goes.

“A January 13, 2017, email from Hera Abbasi, a former congressional advisor in the State Department’s Bureau of Legislative Affairs, suggests that the intelligence community was providing ‘raw intel’ to Sen. Warner,” Judicial Watch reported.

“Such an exchange almost certainly would have been coordinated by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI): ‘Yes, that is correct. Warner/raw intel stuff is going thru IC channels.’ (Abbasi previously worked in Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s office and was a 2017 Next Generation National Security Fellow at the liberal Center for a New American Security. Abbasi donated $725 to the Clinton campaign and Act Blue during the 2016 election cycle.)”

Oh, and it gets better. If you’re a Democrat, I mean.

So three days before the inauguration, the principals say this is a major issue.

“Agree this is a priority… and I don’t see why lengthy reviews are required. I would suggest we send up the things that can go immediately, and if there is any concern about specific internal documents, those be adjudicated separately and sent up as a follow-on,” Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Kathleen Kavalec’s email read.

A few days later, Naz Durakoglu, senior advisor to the Assistant Secretary for European and Eurasian Affairs, said in an email that “there is a time sensitivity to these docs.”

Think this couldn’t get any worse?

Here’s part of what’s described as a heavily redacted email by Foreign Service Officer Kerem Bilge on Jan. 13, 2017:

RELATED: Voters File Lawsuit Against California's Desperate Attempt To Hit at Trump over His Tax Returns

“**** Please clear the action memo by noon TUESDAY [Jan. 17],” he wrote.

“**** Please clear on the actual package of documents, if you have not done so already, by noon TUESDAY [Jan. 17]. [Emphasis in original
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 62787
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 74
Location : Wales UK

http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

OBAMA AGAIN  - Page 2 Empty Re: OBAMA AGAIN

Post  Admin on Tue 10 Sep 2019, 10:35 pm

https://gellerreport.com/2019/09/obamas-treason-against-trump.html/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=facebook
New State Department Documents Reveal Last-Minute Efforts by Obama State Department to Undermine President Trump
By Pamela Geller - on September 10, 2019
DEMOCRAT LEADERSHIP: FIFTH COLUMN
1
Facebook
Twitter
Google+
It’s bloody treason. Then and still now.

NEW STATE DEPARTMENT DOCUMENTS REVEAL LAST-MINUTE EFFORTS BY OBAMA STATE DEPARTMENT TO UNDERMINE PRESIDENT TRUMP
By: Judicial Watch, September 10, 2019:

Emails show Hillary Clinton’s supporters’ efforts to get classified documents and raw intelligence on alleged Russia involvement in 2016 election to Capitol Hill before Trump inauguration

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch today released 90 pages of heavily redacted U.S. Department of State documents showing Obama State Department officials’ efforts to disseminate classified information to multiple U.S. Senators immediately prior to President Donald Trump’s inauguration. The information, which included raw intelligence, purported to show “malign” Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election. Among the senators receiving the classified documents were Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA), Sen. Ben Cardin (D-MD), and Sen. Robert Corker (R-TN).

Judicial Watch obtained the documents through a June 2018 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit filed against the State Department after it failed to respond to a February 2018 request seeking records of the Obama State Department’s last-minute efforts to share classified information about Russia election interference issues with Democratic Senator Ben Cardin (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:18-cv-01381)).

A January 13, 2017, email from Hera Abbasi, a former congressional advisor in the State Department’s Bureau of Legislative Affairs, suggests that the intelligence community was providing “raw intel” to Sen. Warner. Such an exchange almost certainly would have been coordinated by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI): “Yes, that is correct. Warner/raw intel stuff is going thru IC channels.” (Abbasi previously worked in Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s office and was a 2017 Next Generation National Security Fellow at the liberal Center for a New American Security. Abbasi donated $725 to the Clinton campaign and Act Blue during the 2016 election cycle.)

The documents uncovered by Judicial Watch show early in the process of gathering and clearing classified information – beginning a day after Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA) formally asked Attorney General John Kerry for “intelligence products” and “raw intelligence” on Russian involvement in the 2016 election – Assistant Secretary of State Julia Frifield brings Senior Advisor and Investigations Counsel Zachary Schram into the loop in a January 5, 2017, email chain, in which she says Schram would help “figure out the best way to get these to the Hill.” Frifield was an Obama appointee who previously served as Maryland Democratic Senator Barbara Mikulski’s Chief of Staff. (Frifield contributed $2,700 to the 2016 Clinton campaign.)

On January 11, 2017, former State Department Senior Congressional Advisor Katherine Harris sends an email to Abbasi; Naz Durakoglu, who was a senior advisor to the Assistant Secretary for European and Eurasian Affairs; Kathleen Kavalec, and others: “If we are not going through our standard CDP [Collection Due Process] process, others in H need to weigh in on how to move these to the Hill.”

In emails written on January 10 and 11, 2017, from Abbasi to Durakoglu and Kavalec, Abassi expresses the need to get the documents cleared “as soon as possible (ASAP).”

On January 17, 2017, three days before Trump’s inauguration, Kavalec emails Abbasi, Durakoglu and others emphasizing, again, that getting the documents to Cardin and Warner is a priority and urges the process to be sped up:

Agree this is a priority… and I don’t see why lengthy reviews are required. I would suggest we send up the things that can go immediately, and if there is any concern about specific internal documents, those be adjudicated separately and sent up as a follow-on.

In a January 18, 2017 email from Naz Durakoglu to Elizabeth Lawrence, Abbasi, Kerem Bilge, and others regarding the processing of the request, Durakoglu writes, “there is a time sensitivity to these docs.”

Shedding additional light on possible irregularities in the release process, a January 17, 2017, email reveals that ODNI, then led by James Clapper, was involved in clearing cables for release to the Hill. State Department official Cody Walsh emails Schram and Lauren Gills that the ODNI is “fine” with the State Department “sharing … cables with the Hill.”

On January 13, 2017, at 10:27 a.m., Durakoglu emails more than a dozen State Department employees, invoking the name of then-State Department Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland to reiterate the need to accelerate the process of getting materials prepared to go to the Hill: “Hi All. This is a priority for our Assistant Secretary…Is there anything we can do to better facilitate the process?”

Two minutes later, Durakoglu emails Kerem Bilge and two others: “Where are we on clearances? Do I need to ask Toria to raise with Julia? The clock is ticking. 😊” Durakoglu, at the time, was a senior adviser to Nuland. Durakoglu currently works for The Atlantic Council. She contributed $1,600 to the Clinton campaign in 2016.

The concluding, unredacted section of an otherwise heavily redacted email sent on Friday, January 13, 2017, by former Foreign Service Officer Kerem Bilge to numerous State employees indicates the intense time pressure under which State officials were operating to beat the Inauguration-Day deadline:

THE TRUTH MUST BE TOLD
Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeard. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 62787
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 74
Location : Wales UK

http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

OBAMA AGAIN  - Page 2 Empty Re: OBAMA AGAIN

Post  Admin on Mon 09 Sep 2019, 7:42 pm

https://www.patriotnewsalerts.com/obama-ripped-trademark-dispute/?utm_medium=ci&utm_source=push&utm_campaign=pna
.Barack and Michelle Obama ripped for ‘deplorable behavior’ in trademark dispute
September 8, 2019 by Jerry McCormick
“When they go low, we go high” — isn’t that what Michelle Obama said? Well, the Obamas clearly have quit on that philosophy.

Barack and Michelle Obama have decided to sue to steal a trademark away from another company — and they are now facing the backlash for what one lawyer called “deplorable behavior,” according to The Hollywood Reporter.

We Go Low
The Obamas started up a film production company called Higher Ground Productions in 2016.

The problem, though, is that someone else already trademarked a similar name — and that is blocking the Obamas from securing a trademark.

From the WebPowered by ZergNet

Post Malone's $3 Million House in Utah is Built for Apocalypse

The Tragic Story of Sylvester Stallone is Just Plain Sad

Family of Tot Who Died During Cruise Makes Surprising Denial
Higher Ground Enterprises is a company run by Hanisya Massey, who has been in the business of helping authors publish e-books since 2008.

But since the Obamas have already moved forward using that production name for their new Netflix projects, they decided to file a complaint with the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office in hopes of appealing their decision — at the expense of Massey and co.

Not How It Works
When you are filing for a trademark or copyright, one of the steps that is generally performed is to do a trademark search. This should have been done prior to the Obamas ever naming their company.

Instead, they moved forward and are now trying to strip the name from a small business owner simply because they did not do their own homework.

“Instead of simply picking another name, the Obamas’ lawyers have now filed a meritless petition to cancel my client’s trademark so they can take it for themselves,” Larry Zerner, the attorney representing the current owner of the trademark, stated. “This is really deplorable behavior.”

The irony in all of this is that the name of the company is an obvious play on Michelle Obama’s quote, but the fact is, they had already filed for a trademark and were rejected.

DIY: Over 16,000 Step-by-Step Woodworking Plans. Now Build Anything Out Of Wood!
Utopian Reports
The former first lady says go high, yet she and her husband are willing to take the business identity away from an innocent small business owner.

The really sad thing in all of this is that the mainstream media is not even reporting on it. If this were President Donald Trump, you’d better believe it would be headline news.
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 62787
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 74
Location : Wales UK

http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

OBAMA AGAIN  - Page 2 Empty Re: OBAMA AGAIN

Post  Admin on Sun 08 Sep 2019, 9:57 pm

https://www.westernjournal.com/even-ex-obama-adviser-warning-people-joe-biden/?utm_source=push&utm_medium=westernjournalism&utm_content=2019-09-07&utm_campaign=pushtraffic
Even Ex-Obama Adviser Is Warning People About Joe Biden
By C. Douglas Golden
Published September 8, 2019 at 9:32am
Either David Axelrod is too honest or very calculating. Whatever the case may be, neither is particularly good news for Joe Biden.

Axelrod was one of the closest advisers to the president during the Obama administration. Like all former political functionaries, Axelrod has found a place in the media. Unsurprisingly, it’s at CNN, where he’s a senior political commentator and hosts a podcast called “The Axe Files.”
“The Axe” isn’t exactly a fan of “The Donald,” mind you. He (now here’s a shocker) believes he’s a conscious racist flanked by a base of voters little better than zombies. However, just because he’s not toot-tooting the Trump train doesn’t mean he can’t see the trainwreck that is the former vice president’s campaign.
In a Thursday tweet, he took aim at Biden’s gaffes and questioned whether there was something deeper at play:
David Axelrod
✔
@davidaxelrod
It’s one thing to have a well-earned rep for goofy, harmless gaffes.  It’s another if you serially distort your own record.  @JoeBiden is in danger of creating a more damaging meme.https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2019/09/joe-biden-iraq-vote-what-now.html …

When Did Joe Biden Start Believing He Had Opposed the Iraq War?
Biden’s claim to have been antiwar is even weirder and more ahistorical than it seems at first.
slate.com
3,782
2:46 AM - Sep 6, 2019
TRENDING: Biden Appears To Completely Forget About Obama, Calls George W Bush 'The Last President'

“It’s one thing to have a well-earned rep for goofy, harmless gaffes,” Axelrod tweeted.

“It’s another if you serially distort your own record. @JoeBiden is in danger of creating a more damaging meme.”

The tweet links to a Slate piece regarding what was then Biden’s latest solecism: “When Did Joe Biden Start Believing He Had Opposed the Iraq War?”

Do you think Joe Biden will be the Democrats’ 2020 nominee?
Yes No
Enter your email
 
Completing this poll entitles you to The Western Journal news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
The piece revolves around a rationale Biden gave NPR for why he supported authorizing force as a senator back in 2002. According to Biden, the reason he authorized it is because he thought it would never be used.

“[Bush] looked me in the eye in the Oval Office. He said he needed the vote to be able to get inspectors into Iraq to determine whether or not Saddam Hussein was engaged in dealing with a nuclear program,” Biden said. “He got them in and before you know it, we had ‘shock and awe.’”

“Immediately, that moment it started, I came out against the war at that moment,” he added.


Except, of course, he didn’t: “Nine months ago, I voted with my colleagues to give the president of the United States of America the authority to use force, and I would vote that way again today,” Biden told the liberal Brookings Institution during a July 31, 2003, speech.

“It was a right vote then, and it’ll be a correct vote today.”

RELATED: O'Rourke Believes Americans Will Willingly Comply with Gun Confiscation, Won't Need Police

There are other inconsistencies in this story, which Ben Mathis-Lilley lays out fairly well in his Slate piece. He notes that Biden seems to have changed his opinion when George W. Bush’s poll numbers “went underwater for good.”

This distortion doesn’t come in a vacuum, of course, as Biden’s gaffes seldom do. There was also the war story gaffe, the one where The Washington Post discovered that a very moving story he told about an Afghan War hero was also very false.

“Biden got the time period, the location, the heroic act, the type of medal, the military branch and the rank of the recipient, as well as his own role in the ceremony” incorrect, The Post reported.

Biden’s “apology” was one of the “sorry not sorry” variety: “The central point is it was absolutely accurate what I said … The story was that he refused the medal because the fella he tried to save, and risked his life saving, died. That’s the beginning, middle and end.”

And as we all know, Uncle Joe chooses truth over facts.

As Mike Brest notes over at the Washington Examiner, Axelrod wasn’t just another employee over at the Obama White House. He was key in helping Obama choose Biden as his running mate. He worked closely with him for eight years. If he’s noting the fact that Biden isn’t exactly living his best life at the moment, that’s pretty significant news.


Biden’s still ahead in the polls, but the gaffes are getting more serious. It’s not just him saying how he loves the “town” of Vermont when he’s in New Hampshire anymore. This is Neil Kinnock territory. If you’ve forgotten who that is, don’t worry. I get the feeling Joe Biden has, too. And that’s why even “The Axe” is getting worried.

We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 62787
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 74
Location : Wales UK

http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

OBAMA AGAIN  - Page 2 Empty Re: OBAMA AGAIN

Post  Admin on Sun 08 Sep 2019, 8:48 pm

https://www.patriotnewsalerts.com/obama-appointment-supreme-court/?utm_medium=ci&utm_source=push&utm_campaign=pna
Asked if he would nominate Obama for the Supreme Court, Biden says ‘yes’
September 7, 2019 by Jerry McCormick
Joe Biden made another play to win over a few more votes this week while making an appearance on “The Late Show with Stephen Colbert.”

When asked by Colbert if he would nominate Barack Obama to the Supreme Court, Biden responded, “Hell … yes.”

“I don’t think he’d do it,” he added, but agreed with Colbert that Obama would be qualified for the position. Watch below:

Pandering for Votes
If there is one thing we have found out about Biden during this presidential campaign, it is that he loves to bring up Barack Obama as much as possible.

From the WebPowered by ZergNet

Serena Williams Is Speaking Out About Her Sister's Murder

Why Melania Trump Has Us More Than a Bit Worried

Another Bizarre Painting Found at Epstein's New Mexico Ranch
Colbert opened the door for Biden to drop his name, asking him if he called his former boss for advice during this campaign.

Biden, of course, said he talks to Obama all the time, the most recent conversation taking place about three or four weeks ago. That must have been the last time Obama told him he really didn’t have to run for office to prove anything to anyone.

Biden also stated that he had asked Michelle Obama to be his vice president, which elicted a rousing cheer, but Biden finally revealed he was only joking.

Not Really Qualified
Saying Obama is qualified for the Supreme Court, though, is a bit of a stretch. Obama is listed as a Constitutional professor at Chicago University, but he has proven during his time as president he has little respect for the Constitution itself.

One need only look at DACA to prove that Obama has no idea what the Constitution allows and does not allow.

If you need more proof, look at how he sidestepped legislative procedures to push through both the Iran deal and Obamacare.

Can you imagine the disaster the Supreme Court would become if someone as far left as Obama was allowed to sit on the bench for the next three decades?

If Biden was truly serious about nominating Obama to the Supreme Court, he has provided us with more than enough proof that he is not fit for the office.
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 62787
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 74
Location : Wales UK

http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

OBAMA AGAIN  - Page 2 Empty Re: OBAMA AGAIN

Post  Admin on Fri 06 Sep 2019, 9:01 pm

Top Democrat walks back support for Barack Obama: ‘He made me promises, which he broke’
September 5, 2019 by Jerry McCormick
Harvard University Law Professor Alan Dershowitz is done with former President Barack Obama.
https://www.patriotnewsalerts.com/top-democrat-walks-back/?utm_medium=ci&utm_source=push&utm_campaign=pna
According to the high-profile attorney and legal pundit, Dershowitz broke his ties with Obama because the former president lied to him about his promise to stand by Israel.

“He made me promises, which he broke, and I broke my relationship with President Obama,” Dershowitz said, according to One America News Network (OANN).

Dershowitz is a lifelong Democrat and was a self-admitted Obama supporter during the 2008 election season. This was in part because he and Obama had discussed at length that Obama would stand by Israel, Dershowitz said in a recent interview.

However, according to Dershowitz, in one of Obama’s last acts as president, he turned on Israel, stabbing both Dershowitz — and the Jewish state — in the back on his way out the door.

That decision was to sit on the sidelines while the U.N. condemned Israel for occupying the Western Wall, a place considered to be the holiest place in all of Judaism.

And after Obama turned his back on Israel, Dershowitz turned his back on Obama.

The Great Divide
The actions of Obama continue to linger in the Democratic Party. Never before have we seen such a level of disrespect toward one of our major allies, but several members of the so-called “Squad” have backed organizations and legislation that openly oppose Israel.

The most recent example is a publicity stunt by Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) and Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-MI), who attempted to visit Israel.

The two were banned after Israel saw their agenda, which the country believed amounted to nothing more than plans to rail against Israel and promote Palestine.

Obama’s actions were clearly infectious, and have taken hold in the younger generation of Democrats. It is for that very reason that people like Dershowitz have walked to the middle of the aisle, and for the first time ever, will consider voting for Republicans come Election Day 2020.
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 62787
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 74
Location : Wales UK

http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

OBAMA AGAIN  - Page 2 Empty Re: OBAMA AGAIN

Post  Admin on Tue 03 Sep 2019, 7:24 pm

https://www.jihadwatch.org/2019/09/suspended-years-ago-by-obama-trial-date-of-9-11-jihad-plotters-finally-set-for-2021
Delayed by Obama, Trial of 9/11 Plotters Finally Set for 2021
SEP 2, 2019 12:00 PM BY ROBERT SPENCER 25 COMMENTS
My latest in PJ Media:

For those of you who weren’t yet born on September 11, 2001, on that day Islamic jihadis killed nearly 3,000 Americans in attacks on the Twin Towers and the Pentagon. A fourth plane was set to murder even more people by crashing into another landmark in Washington, but it was downed in Pennsylvania by its passengers in order to thwart the jihadis’ plans. Even those who don’t remember the day have probably learned about it in school, but few people are aware of the fact that the surviving plotters have not yet been brought to trial.

That is now set to change on January 11, 2021, the day that Air Force Colonel W. Shane Cohen has just set the trial to begin at Camp Justice, at Guantánamo Bay in Cuba.

Why has it taken nearly twenty years for these jihadis to face justice? Largely because of Barack Obama.

The trial will take place nearly nine years after the plotters – Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, Walid bin Attash, Ramzi bin al-Shibh, Ammar al-Baluchi, and Mustafa al-Hawsawi – were arraigned. The Daily Mail reported that “Cohen’s announcement marks the first time that a trial judge in the case actually established a date. Prosecutors had tried to get the ball rolling with two previous judges after the 2012 arraignment.”

The trial will also begin nearly twelve years after Khalid Shaikh Mohammed and the others for all intents and purposes admitted their role in the 9/11 jihad attacks, penning a lengthy Islamic defense for their actions in which they never denied plotting the hijacking of planes in order to commit mass murder of American civilians, but justified their actions by claiming that the U.S. was the greater terrorist. They signed the document “the 9/11 Shura Council.”

This was not a document obtained under torture, but a closely reasoned explanation of why the 9/11 attacks were justified from the standpoint of Islamic doctrine and belief….

There is much more. Read the rest here.

Share this:
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 62787
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 74
Location : Wales UK

http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

OBAMA AGAIN  - Page 2 Empty Re: OBAMA AGAIN

Post  Admin on Tue 27 Aug 2019, 11:20 pm

https://www.patriotnewsalerts.com/internet-blasts-obamas-mansion/?utm_medium=ci&utm_source=push&utm_campaign=pna
Internet blasts Barack and Michelle Obama for purchasing Martha’s Vineyard mansion
August 26, 2019 by Jerry McCormick
For people who preach about income equality and climate change, the Obamas have a funny way of showing their concern.

TMZ recently reported that the Obamas are about to buy a $15 million oceanfront property on Martha’s Vineyard, and internet trolls could not wait to point out the numerous ironies of this purchase.

What About Climate Change?
According to climate change doomsayers, we have a dozen years before the ocean starts to swallow us all up. If someone is a true believer in climate change, they would not invest in oceanfront property, right?

Ironically, that is exactly where the mansion that Obamas are considering purchasing sits. If they truly thought these major problems were on the horizon, why would they be sinking so much money into a property that is about to fall into the ocean?

The following tweet is typical of what the Obamas received on this front:
Amy Curtis
@RantyAmyCurtis
 If I genuinely believed in 12 years coastal areas would be under water, I wouldn’t by a $15 million mansion on...Martha’s Vineyard. 
Call me crazy, but it doesn’t seem like Obama is taking climate change all that seriously. https://twitter.com/tmz/status/1164435551811801088
TMZ
✔
@TMZ
Barack and Michelle Obama Buying Mega-Mansion in Martha's Vineyard http://dlvr.it/RBg5xX 
18K
1:52 AM - Aug 23, 2019 · Milwaukee, WI
Twitter Ads info and privacy
7,598 people are talking about this
What About Income Equality?
When Barack Obama took office, the couple had a net worth of about $1.5 million. The only reason it was that high was because of book advances they had reportedly received.
Now, Obama alone is alleged to have a net worth of more than $40. Together, the couple is reported to have a net worth of more than $100 million.
Adam Ford, who founded the satire site Babylon Bee, also questioned why Obama is not living up to his own expectations of people spreading their wealth around at a certain point.
Adam Ford
@Adam4d
 Obama, 2008: "When you spread the wealth around, it's good for everybody"
Obama, 2010: "At a certain point, you've made enough money"
Obama, 2019: "I'll take the $15 million Martha's Vineyard mansion on 29 beachfront acres" https://twitter.com/TMZ/status/1164435551811801088
TMZ
✔
@TMZ
Barack and Michelle Obama Buying Mega-Mansion in Martha's Vineyard http://dlvr.it/RBg5xX 
13.8K
1:32 PM - Aug 22, 2019
Twitter Ads info and privacy
5,949 people are talking about this
The questions Ford put to Obama could be put to virtually every high-profile Democrat today.
Joe Biden became a very rich man after leaving office. Bernie Sanders is now a multi-millionaire who refuses to spread his wealth around, even though he wants to implement a socialist agenda here in the United States.
The list goes on and on, with politicians like Maxine Waters and Nancy Pelosi having accumulated personal fortunes while serving in Congress.
All these Democrats talk a great game about sharing the wealth and preaching the end of times, but very few of them actually walk the walk to prove they actually believe the nonsense they are spewing, including the golden boy of the Democratic Party, Barack Obama.
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 62787
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 74
Location : Wales UK

http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

OBAMA AGAIN  - Page 2 Empty Re: OBAMA AGAIN

Post  Admin on Sun 25 Aug 2019, 9:18 pm

https://www.conservativeinstitute.org/conservative-news/biden-question-assassination-obama.htm
Biden puzzles audience with bizarre question: Imagine if Obama had been assassinated
August 24, 2019

Democratic presidential hopeful Joe Biden just keeps delivering.

This time, the gaffe-prone former vice president asked his audience to contemplate the hypothetical assassination of former President Barack Obama. 

What if . . .
This all occurred at a town hall event in New Hampshire just before the weekend. The focus of the get-together was supposed to be healthcare, but Biden, unsurprisingly, veered off-script.

“I have one hero who was my dad, but I have two political heroes were Martin Luther King and Bobby Kennedy,” said Biden, who recently claimed inaccurately that both men were killed in the late 1970s. “My senior semester they were both shot and killed.”

What came next is what has everyone scratching their heads.

“Imagine what would have happened if, God forbid, Barack Obama had been assassinated after becoming the de facto nominee,” Biden asked. “What would have happened in America?”

Context?
It’s unclear exactly what he meant, but Biden may have been bringing this up in order to illustrate his own political awakening in the 1960s and 1970s. These decades were a chaotic time in America, which seems to be one of the things that Biden was trying to emphasize.

“An entire generation was energized,” he recalled. “We finally finished the Voting Rights Act. We finally got the Civil Rights Act back on the road.”

The vice president also brought up his role in furthering women’s rights, which he claims earned him the reputation of being gay.

“We finally were in a position where we started to begin the women’s movement and began to treat women — I remember because I was such a big supporter of the E.R.A,” said Biden. “In 1972, quote — to show you how things have changed, thank God — ‘Well, you know why Biden is for the E.R.A., he’s probably gay.’ Not a joke.”

On a roll
This is just the latest of several Biden gaffes made just over the past month. Two others were his remark that “poor kids are just as bright and just as talented as white kids,” and his claim that he was vice president during the Parkland, Florida, school shooting in February 2018 (Biden left office in 2017.)

Nonetheless, the former vice president is still leading the crowd of Democrats vying for the right to go up against President Donald Trump in 2020.
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 62787
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 74
Location : Wales UK

http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

OBAMA AGAIN  - Page 2 Empty Re: OBAMA AGAIN

Post  Admin on Sat 24 Aug 2019, 8:26 pm

Report: The Obamas are buying a $15M estate
August 23, 2019 by Jerry McCormick
The Obamas aren’t even trying to hide it anymore. Being in politics has made them elitists.
https://www.patriotnewsalerts.com/report-obamas-buying-million/?utm_medium=ci&utm_source=push&utm_campaign=pna
The former president who was once worried about getting his credit card declined is now reportedly about to purchase a multi-million dollar estate on the oceanfront at Martha’s Vineyard.

It Pays to be President
Just prior to running for President, Obama’s net worth was estimated to be around $1.3 million, but that was believed to mostly be due to book advances.

Just prior to Obama’s birthday this year, his net worth was reported at roughly $40 million. That is an increase of more than 30 times his net worth in less than three years after having left office.

Obama followed the same game plan as the Clintons did. When Bill Clinton left office, he was reportedly millions of dollars in debt.

Today, the Clintons are very conservatively estimated to be worth about $100 million together, a figure that continues to increase with every new book deal and speaking engagement.

Living the High Life
The Obamas have not been shy about spending their money, either. After all, their bank account seemingly has an endless stream of money with book deals and speaking engagements on the horizon.

After Obama left office, they bought a D.C. mansion worth almost $9 million.

Now, they apparently have a bid in for the summer home of Boston Celtic’s co-owner Wyc Grousbeck. The Obamas reportedly stayed at the Martha’s Vineyard property during the summer and decided to buy it.

While the property is currently valued just shy of $15 million, Obama is reportedly getting the property for about a million less. I guess that is the price of doing business with the darling of the Democrat party.

The mansion is located on 29 acres of beachfront property and is about 6,900 sq. ft.

It has about everything one could ever hope for, so the former president should be more than comfortable living out his retirement years there. In fact, the taxpayer check he gets every year for a little more than $200,000 should be plenty to cover the utilities for the year.
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 62787
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 74
Location : Wales UK

http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

OBAMA AGAIN  - Page 2 Empty Re: OBAMA AGAIN

Post  Admin on Mon 19 Aug 2019, 10:52 am

Report: Obama Warned Biden — ‘You Don’t Have to Do This, Joe’
2,485
President Barack Obama listens to Vice President Joe Biden make remarks before signing the 21st Century Cures Act, Tuesday, Dec. 13, 2016, in the South Court Auditorium in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building on the White House complex in Washington. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais
JOSHUA CAPLAN16 Aug 20191,741
4:12
Former President Barack Obama reportedly wasn’t particularly sold on the idea of Joe Biden, his vice president for eight years, mounting his own bid for the White House in 2020.
“You don’t have to do this, Joe, you really don’t,” Obama told Biden before the 76-year-old formally launched his campaign in April, according to the New York Times.
“Mr. Biden — who thinks he could have defeated Donald Trump four years ago — responded by telling Mr. Obama he could never forgive himself if he turned down a second shot at Mr. Trump,” the Times reports.
The Times states Obama huddled with top Biden aides in March to implore they insure that the former vice president does not “damage his legacy” or “embarrass himself.”
The newspaper further reports Obama and Biden met over lunch last, where the former president urged the White House hopeful to recruit fresher faces to his campaign. “He has communicated his frustration that Mr. Biden’s closest advisers are too old and out of touch with the current political climate — urging him to include more younger aides,” the Times said.

MORE https://www.breitbart.com/2020-election/2019/08/16/report-obama-warned-biden-you-dont-have-to-do-this-joe/?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_term=daily&utm_campaign=20190816&utm_content=Final
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 62787
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 74
Location : Wales UK

http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

OBAMA AGAIN  - Page 2 Empty Re: OBAMA AGAIN

Post  Admin on Sat 17 Aug 2019, 9:17 pm

https://www.patriotnewsalerts.com/obama-security-adviser-comes/?utm_medium=ci&utm_source=push&utm_campaign=pna
Obama National Security adviser comes under heightened scrutiny for the 2017 ‘unmasking’ of Trump officials
August 16, 2019 by Jerry McCormick
In the final days of Barack Obama’s presidency, numerous Trump campaign officials were “unmasked” by then-National Security adviser Susan Rice.

Now, it seems quite clear that the move was both unprecedented and politically motivated, according to One America News Network (OAN).

Peeling off the mask
Typically, during investigations as elaborate and secretive as the one into alleged collusion between the 2016 Trump campaign team and Russia, the identities of individuals being probed are protected.

This is done to protect the individual from being scrutinized prior to the investigation being completed, and to prevent them from being falsely accused, particularly if no indictment ever materializes.

Generally speaking, the number of people who can “unmask” a protected individual is kept to a minimum. However, during the latter part of the Obama administration, all of those protocols seemed to change.

Not only were more officials given the authority to “unmask” the subjects of federal probes, but Trump officials were also unmasked for what seemed to be political reasons, according to OAN.

Take a look:
Breaking it down
At the time of the unmasking by Rice, the Obama administration was investigating back-channel communications between the Trump campaign and the United Arab Emirates. Suspicions had started to arise when Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed al-Nahyan came to New York in December 2016.

Since UAE diplomats did not notify the United States of his travel, as is customary, everyone’s ears went up. So in early 2017, Rice requested that Americans in a related classified report be unmasked.

The overall concern was that the UAE was setting up back-channel communications between Russia and the Trump campaign. But based on the reports of UAE officials, who stated the meeting was nothing more than getting the president-elect’s “view of the region and what the U.S. role should be,” Rice’s unmasking seems completely inappropriate.

Now the question remains: What else did the Obama administration do wrong?
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 62787
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 74
Location : Wales UK

http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

OBAMA AGAIN  - Page 2 Empty Re: OBAMA AGAIN

Post  Admin on Sat 17 Aug 2019, 3:13 pm

https://www.patriotnewsalerts.com/obama-security-adviser-comes/
Obama National Security adviser comes under heightened scrutiny for the 2017 ‘unmasking’ of Trump officials
August 16, 2019 by Jerry McCormick
In the final days of Barack Obama’s presidency, numerous Trump campaign officials were “unmasked” by then-National Security adviser Susan Rice.


Now, it seems quite clear that the move was both unprecedented and politically motivated, according to One America News Network (OAN).
Peeling off the mask
Typically, during investigations as elaborate and secretive as the one into alleged collusion between the 2016 Trump campaign team and Russia, the identities of individuals being probed are protected.


This is done to protect the individual from being scrutinized prior to the investigation being completed, and to prevent them from being falsely accused, particularly if no indictment ever materializes.


Generally speaking, the number of people who can “unmask” a protected individual is kept to a minimum. However, during the latter part of the Obama administration, all of those protocols seemed to change.


Not only were more officials given the authority to “unmask” the subjects of federal probes, but Trump officials were also unmasked for what seemed to be political reasons, according to OAN.


Take a look:
Breaking it down
At the time of the unmasking by Rice, the Obama administration was investigating back-channel communications between the Trump campaign and the United Arab Emirates. Suspicions had started to arise when Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed al-Nahyan came to New York in December 2016.


Since UAE diplomats did not notify the United States of his travel, as is customary, everyone’s ears went up. So in early 2017, Rice requested that Americans in a related classified report be unmasked.


The overall concern was that the UAE was setting up back-channel communications between Russia and the Trump campaign. But based on the reports of UAE officials, who stated the meeting was nothing more than getting the president-elect’s “view of the region and what the U.S. role should be,” Rice’s unmasking seems completely inappropriate.


Now the question remains: What else did the Obama administration do wrong?
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 62787
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 74
Location : Wales UK

http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

OBAMA AGAIN  - Page 2 Empty Re: OBAMA AGAIN

Post  Admin on Thu 15 Aug 2019, 10:45 pm

Thomas W. Ahlf is with Lana Henderson.
July 21, 2015 at 4:17 PM
Quit trashing Obama's accomplishments. He has done more than any other President before him. Here is a list of his impressive accomplishments:

1. First President to be photographed smoking a joint. 
2. First President to apply for college aid as a foreign student, then deny he was a foreigner. 
3. First President to have a social security number from a state he has never lived in. 
4. First President to preside over a cut to the credit-rating of the United States. 
5. First President to violate the War Powers Act. 
6. First President to be held in contempt of court for illegally obstructing oil drilling in the Gulf of Mexico. 
7. First President to require all Americans to purchase a product from a third party. 
8. First President to spend a trillion dollars on "shovel-ready" jobs when there was no such thing as "shovel-ready" jobs. 
9. First President to abrogate bankruptcy law to turn over control of companies to his union supporters. 
10. First President to by-pass Congress and implement the Dream Act through executive fiat. 
11. First President to order a secret amnesty program that stopped the deportation of illegal immigrants across the U.S., including those with criminal convictions. 
12. First President to demand a company hand-over $20 billion to one of his political appointees. 
13. First President to tell a CEO of a major corporation (Chrysler) to resign. 
14. First President to terminate America’s ability to put a man in space. 
15. First President to cancel the National Day of Prayer and to say that America is no longer a Christian nation. 
16. First President to have a law signed by an auto-pen without being present. 
17. First President to arbitrarily declare an existing law unconstitutional and refuse to enforce it. 
18. First President to threaten insurance companies if they publicly spoke out on the reasons for their rate increases. 
19. First President to tell a major manufacturing company in which state it is allowed to locate a factory. 
20. First President to file lawsuits against the states he swore an oath to protect (AZ, WI, OH, IN). 
21. First President to withdraw an existing coal permit that had been properly issued years ago. 
22. First President to actively try to bankrupt an American industry (coal). 
23. First President to fire an inspector general of AmeriCorps for catching one of his friends in a corruption case. 
24. First President to appoint 45 czars to replace elected officials in his office. 
25. First President to surround himself with radical left wing anarchists. 
26. First President to golf more than 150 separate times in his five years in office. 
27. First President to hide his birth, medical, educational and travel records. 
28. First President to win a Nobel Peace Prize for doing NOTHING to earn it. 
29. First President to go on multiple "global apology tours" and concurrent "insult our friends" tours. 
30. First President to go on over 17 lavish vacations, in addition to date nights and Wednesday evening White House parties for his friends paid for by the taxpayers. 
31. First President to have personal servants (taxpayer funded) for his wife. 
32. First President to keep a dog trainer on retainer for $102,000 a year at taxpayer expense. 
33. First President to fly in a personal trainer from Chicago at least once a week at taxpayer expense. 
34. First President to repeat the Quran and tell us the early morning call of the Azan (Islamic call to worship) is the most beautiful sound on earth. 
35. First President to side with a foreign nation over one of the American 50 states (Mexico vs Arizona). 
36. First President to tell the military men and women that they should pay for their own private insurance because they "volunteered to go to war and knew the consequences." 
37. Then he was the First President to tell the members of the military that THEY were UNPATRIOTIC for balking at the last suggestion.

I feel much better now. I had been under the impression he hadn't been doing ANYTHING... Such an accomplished individual... in the eyes of the ignorant maybe.!.
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 62787
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 74
Location : Wales UK

http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

OBAMA AGAIN  - Page 2 Empty Re: OBAMA AGAIN

Post  Admin on Wed 14 Aug 2019, 6:41 pm

https://nypost.com/2015/02/18/obama-defends-the-true-peaceful-nature-of-islam/?fbclid=IwAR0OAXCt_YyAQFx_5rqKrVN_g_ssPGQiy2x6X0qWPUMJFM3yC3WRGQHLaTY
Obama defends the ‘true peaceful nature of Islam’
By Chris Perez February 18, 2015 | 10:10am
Enlarge Image
ISIS prepares to behead 21 Coptic Christians -- or, as the terrorists label them, "people of the cross" -- on the beach in Libya.
ISIS prepares to behead 21 Coptic Christians -- or, as the terrorists label them, "people of the cross" -- on the beach in Libya.
President Obama defended the “true peaceful nature of Islam” on Wednesday — saying terrorist groups like ISIS promote a “twisted interpretation of religion that is rejected by the overwhelming majority of the world’s Muslims.”

In an op-ed published in the Los Angeles Times, the commander-in-chief provided a possible preview of a speech later at a White House Summit on Countering Violent Extremism, in which community leaders from across the country gathered to discuss how to protect people from “extremist ideologies.”

“The world must continue to lift up the voices of Muslim clerics and scholars who teach the true peaceful nature of Islam,” Obama wrote.

“We can echo the testimonies of former extremists who know how terrorists betray Islam. We can help Muslim entrepreneurs and youths work with the private sector to develop social media tools to counter extremist narratives on the Internet.”

“This week, we’ll be joined by people of many faiths, including Muslim Americans who make extraordinary contributions to our country every day,” he added.

“It’s a reminder that America is successful because we welcome people of all faiths and backgrounds.”

The president once again refused to utter phrases such as “Islamic terrorism” or “Islamic extremist” — instead referring to ISIS militants as “individuals from various religions” who practice “hateful ideologies.”

“Our campaign to prevent people around the world from being radicalized to violence is ultimately a battle for hearts and minds,” Obama said.

“With this week’s summit, we’ll show once more that — unlike terrorists who only offer misery and death — it is our free societies and diverse communities that offer the true path to opportunity, justice and dignity.”

When describing the cold-blooded murder of three young Muslim students near the University of North Carolina last week, Obama explained that Americans of all religions must “insist that no one should ever be targeted because of who they are, what they look like, or how they worship.”

Authorities have claimed that the primary motive for the killing stemmed from an argument about a parking space, but the father of two of the victims called the slayings a “hate crime.”

In his op-ed, Obama said “we do not yet know why” the students were killed.

“We know that many Muslim Americans across our country are worried and afraid,” Obama wrote. “Americans of all faiths and backgrounds must continue to stand united with a community in mourning.”

The president says that while the US has “decimated the core al Qaeda leadership, strengthened homeland security and worked to prevent another large-scale attack like 9/11,” the only way groups such as ISIS can be brought to justice for barbaric killings and ruthless acts is if the world can “stand united internationally.”

“We know that military force alone cannot solve this problem,” Obama wrote. “Nor can we simply take out terrorists who kill innocent civilians. We also have to confront the violent extremists — the propagandists, recruiters and enablers — who may not directly engage in terrorist acts themselves, but who radicalize, recruit and incite others to do so.”

Obama’s op-ed was a more carefully crafted version of a message that State Department spokeswoman Marie Harf tried to deliver Tuesday, when she drew fire for saying on CNN that jobs were at the core of the global terror threat.

“But we cannot win this war by killing [terrorists],” she said. “We cannot kill our way out of this war. We need in the medium to longer term to go after the root causes that leads people to join these groups, whether it’s a lack of opportunity for jobs or …,” she trailed off.
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 62787
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 74
Location : Wales UK

http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

OBAMA AGAIN  - Page 2 Empty Re: OBAMA AGAIN

Post  Admin on Wed 14 Aug 2019, 4:44 pm

https://nypost.com/2015/02/18/obama-defends-the-true-peaceful-nature-of-islam/?fbclid=IwAR0OAXCt_YyAQFx_5rqKrVN_g_ssPGQiy2x6X0qWPUMJFM3yC3WRGQHLaTY
Obama defends the ‘true peaceful nature of Islam’
By Chris Perez February 18, 2015 | 10:10am
Enlarge Image
ISIS prepares to behead 21 Coptic Christians -- or, as the terrorists label them, "people of the cross" -- on the beach in Libya.
ISIS prepares to behead 21 Coptic Christians -- or, as the terrorists label them, "people of the cross" -- on the beach in Libya.
President Obama defended the “true peaceful nature of Islam” on Wednesday — saying terrorist groups like ISIS promote a “twisted interpretation of religion that is rejected by the overwhelming majority of the world’s Muslims.”

In an op-ed published in the Los Angeles Times, the commander-in-chief provided a possible preview of a speech later at a White House Summit on Countering Violent Extremism, in which community leaders from across the country gathered to discuss how to protect people from “extremist ideologies.”

“The world must continue to lift up the voices of Muslim clerics and scholars who teach the true peaceful nature of Islam,” Obama wrote.

“We can echo the testimonies of former extremists who know how terrorists betray Islam. We can help Muslim entrepreneurs and youths work with the private sector to develop social media tools to counter extremist narratives on the Internet.”

“This week, we’ll be joined by people of many faiths, including Muslim Americans who make extraordinary contributions to our country every day,” he added.

“It’s a reminder that America is successful because we welcome people of all faiths and backgrounds.”

The president once again refused to utter phrases such as “Islamic terrorism” or “Islamic extremist” — instead referring to ISIS militants as “individuals from various religions” who practice “hateful ideologies.”

“Our campaign to prevent people around the world from being radicalized to violence is ultimately a battle for hearts and minds,” Obama said.

“With this week’s summit, we’ll show once more that — unlike terrorists who only offer misery and death — it is our free societies and diverse communities that offer the true path to opportunity, justice and dignity.”

When describing the cold-blooded murder of three young Muslim students near the University of North Carolina last week, Obama explained that Americans of all religions must “insist that no one should ever be targeted because of who they are, what they look like, or how they worship.”

Authorities have claimed that the primary motive for the killing stemmed from an argument about a parking space, but the father of two of the victims called the slayings a “hate crime.”

In his op-ed, Obama said “we do not yet know why” the students were killed.

“We know that many Muslim Americans across our country are worried and afraid,” Obama wrote. “Americans of all faiths and backgrounds must continue to stand united with a community in mourning.”

The president says that while the US has “decimated the core al Qaeda leadership, strengthened homeland security and worked to prevent another large-scale attack like 9/11,” the only way groups such as ISIS can be brought to justice for barbaric killings and ruthless acts is if the world can “stand united internationally.”

“We know that military force alone cannot solve this problem,” Obama wrote. “Nor can we simply take out terrorists who kill innocent civilians. We also have to confront the violent extremists — the propagandists, recruiters and enablers — who may not directly engage in terrorist acts themselves, but who radicalize, recruit and incite others to do so.”

Obama’s op-ed was a more carefully crafted version of a message that State Department spokeswoman Marie Harf tried to deliver Tuesday, when she drew fire for saying on CNN that jobs were at the core of the global terror threat.

“But we cannot win this war by killing [terrorists],” she said. “We cannot kill our way out of this war. We need in the medium to longer term to go after the root causes that leads people to join these groups, whether it’s a lack of opportunity for jobs or …,” she trailed off.
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 62787
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 74
Location : Wales UK

http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

OBAMA AGAIN  - Page 2 Empty Re: OBAMA AGAIN

Post  Admin on Mon 12 Aug 2019, 9:26 pm

https://www.conservativeinstitute.org/conservative-news/ohr-302s-obama-officials.htm
Bruce Ohr’s 302s reveal Trump research was being shared with top Obama officials
August 10, 2019

Notes from a 2016 conversation between the FBI and former Deputy Associate Attorney General Bruce Ohr have been released. Known as Form 302’s, they summarize what was said during the interview.

That’s bad news for Obama administration officials. On November 22, Ohr told agents that “reporting on Trump’s ties to Russia were going to the [Hillary] Clinton campaign, Jon Winer at the U.S. State Department and the FBI.” At the time, Winer was serving as a senior aide to then-Secretary of State John Kerry.

Tying it all together
The documents provide more evidence to confirm what Republicans have long alleged — that the Obama administration was involved in the partisan targeting of Donald Trump. Fox News host Sean Hannity commented on Thursday:

Without any question or ambiguity at all, these 302s show that the FBI, Fusion GPS, who was working on behalf of the Clinton campaign, she was paying for it, Christopher Steele, the Obama State Department, the Obama DOJ, all of them working together to dig up dirt on all things Donald Trump before and after the election.

Ohr, Fusion GPS, Steele, Clinton
Ohr worked to distribute anti-Trump material that was contained within the “Steele Dossier” — a body of salacious and unverified allegations that former British spy Christopher Steele had purportedly compiled from unknown Russian sources.

While Steele asserted that the Trump campaign had colluded with the Russian government to win the election, a two-year investigation by Special Counsel Robert Mueller produced no evidence that any such collusion occurred.

Steele had compiled the dossier at the behest of the research firm Fusion GPS, which had itself been contracted by the Clinton campaign to gather dirt on then-candidate Donald Trump. Ohr’s wife Nellie was employed by the company, a fact that he failed to disclose and which lead to his removal in 2017. He was later reassigned and given a raise.

Ohr also said Steele was “desperate that Donald Trump not get elected and was passionate about him not being the U.S. President.” Steele’s work was ultimately used by the FBI in obtaining warrants to spy on Trump campaign, although FISA courts were never informed of its dubious origins.

“Unprecedented and irregular effort”
The documents were obtained by the conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch via a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit. Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton put out a statement upon their release.

“These new Bruce Ohr FBI 302s show an unprecedented and irregular effort by the FBI, DOJ, and State Department to dig up dirt on President Trump using the conflicted Bruce Ohr, his wife, and the Clinton/DNC spies at Fusion GPS,” Fitton stated.

“The FISA courts weren’t informed of this corrupted process when they were asked to approve and reapprove extraordinary spy warrants targeting President Trump,” he added.

Top Obama admin officials implicated
This isn’t the only dubious behavior on Ohr’s part; he admitted in his Congressional testimony to have met and communicated with disgraced FBI agent Peter Strzok. Strzok and his lover, FBI lawyer Lisa Page, exchanged numerous anti-Trump text messages, including one in which Strzok promised to “stop” Trump from becoming president.

This information further confirms that top Obama officials used unethical and illegal means to target the Trump campaign. How far up the wrongdoing went remains to be seen.
https://www.conservativeinstitute.org/conservative-news/ohr-302s-obama-officials.htm
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 62787
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 74
Location : Wales UK

http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

OBAMA AGAIN  - Page 2 Empty Re: OBAMA AGAIN

Post  Admin on Thu 25 Jul 2019, 10:50 pm

Obama’s absurd deal with Iran just got blasted by the president
By Leah Rosenberg -  July 25, 2019 1241 0
6
Share on Facebook
Tweet
Was Barack Obama’s deal with Iran the worst political deal of the 21st century? One can certainly argue that it was. It certainly makes the Top 5 list. There is no question that President Obama viewed what he was doing as a transformation. His goal was to shift the balance of power in the Middle East in order to weaken Israel and bring a more balanced approach as to how the United States viewed the Israeli – Arab conflict.

Trump: Iran Nothing But Trouble
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V6_zYG2AIYM&ab_channel=i24NEWSEnglish

Boost this video to reach up to 1000 people
Appeasement as a Strategy
In truth, President Obama was outwitted by the Iranian Mullahs. They understood well that all they needed to do was to buy time in order to complete their nuclear building plans. As long as they had another 5-10 years of quiet, they would be able to reach the critical point they strived for. That was the point of nuclear blackmail. Iran understands well that nobody wants a nuclear war, and nobody wants to be the one to destroy a nuclear reactor. But Iran was willing to threaten the world in ways that no other country was willing to because of their willingness to play the game of brinkmanship.

Irresponsibility is a very strong part of negotiation in the Middle East. That strengthens the hand against responsible leaders who cannot take the chance of being accused that they are leading their country into a dangerous battle with a powerful enemy. President Trump understands how to make deals. Even his most strident foes understand that this is perhaps his best strength. He looked at the Iranian deal and could not find anything positive that the United States got out of the deal. He only saw an upside for the Iranian side.

But that is the nature of the appeasers. They kick the can down the road and hope that somehow, things will just sort of work themselves out. That is foolhardy at best, but usually much worse than that. It was the Iranian plan that led to the description of Obama as the modern-day Neville Chamberlain who appeased Germany before World War II. That description has unfortunately proven to be accurate.
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 62787
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 74
Location : Wales UK

http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

OBAMA AGAIN  - Page 2 Empty Re: OBAMA AGAIN

Post  Admin on Sun 21 Jul 2019, 11:23 am

NEWS
https://nypost.com/2016/09/07/us-payment-of-1-7-billion-to-iran-made-entirely-in-cash/?
US payment of $1.7 billion to Iran made entirely in cash
By Associated Press September 7, 2016 | 4:10am
Enlarge Image
US payment of $1.7 billion to Iran made entirely in cash
Barack Obama Reuters
MORE ON:
IRAN
British foreign secretary warns of 'serious consequences' over Iran seizing oil tanker
Iran: British tanker seizure follows 'rule of reciprocal action'
British tankers seized by Iran in Strait of Hormuz
Iran denies that US shot down its drone in the Strait of Hormuz
WASHINGTON — The Obama administration is acknowledging its transfer of $1.7 billion to Iran earlier this year was made entirely in cash, using non-U.S. currency, as Republican critics of the transaction continued to denounce the payments.

Treasury Department spokeswoman Dawn Selak said in a statement late Tuesday that the cash payments were necessary because of the “effectiveness of U.S. and international sanctions,” which isolated Iran from the international finance system.

The $1.7 billion was the settlement of a decades-old arbitration claim between the U.S. and Iran. An initial $400 million of euros, Swiss francs and other foreign currency was delivered on pallets Jan. 17, the same day Tehran agreed to release four American prisoners.

The Obama administration had claimed the events were separate, but recently acknowledged the cash was used as leverage until the Americans were allowed to leave Iran. The remaining $1.3 billion represented estimated interest on the Iranian cash the U.S. had held since the 1970s. The administration had previously declined to say if the interest was delivered to Iran in physical cash, as with the principal, or via a more regular banking mechanism.

Earlier Tuesday, officials from the State, Justice and Treasury departments held a closed-door briefing for congressional staff on the payments, according to a Capitol Hill aide familiar with the session. The officials said the $1.3 billion was paid in cash on Jan. 22 and Feb. 5. The aide was not authorized to speak publicly and requested anonymity.

The money came from a little-known fund administered by the Treasury Department for settling litigation claims. The so-called Judgment Fund is taxpayer money Congress has permanently approved in the event it’s needed, allowing the president to bypass direct congressional approval to make a settlement. The U.S. previously paid out $278 million in Iran-related claims by using the fund in 1991.

SEE ALSO 
 
State Dept.: $400M to Iran was contingent on US prisoners' release
Republicans have decried the payments as ransom, a charge the Obama administration has rejected. On Tuesday, a group of Republican senators announced their support for legislation that would bar payments from the Judgment Fund to Iran until Tehran pays the nearly $55.6 billion that U.S. courts have judged that it owes to American victims of Iranian terrorism.

“President Obama’s disastrous nuclear deal with Iran was sweetened with an illicit ransom payment and billions of dollars for the world’s foremost state sponsor of terrorism,” said Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., the bill’s primary sponsor.

Rep. Ed Royce, R-Calif., the chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, also introduced a bill that prohibits cash payments to Iran and demands transparency on future settlements.

“All of this was done in secret, hidden from the American people and from Congress,” Royce said of the cash payments to Iran.

Both the House and Senate are planning to hold hearings on the payments.
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 62787
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 74
Location : Wales UK

http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

OBAMA AGAIN  - Page 2 Empty Re: OBAMA AGAIN

Post  Admin on Fri 19 Jul 2019, 5:47 pm

Obama officials caught advising Iran how to defeat U.S. foreign policy
One America News Network
Published on 5 Jun 2019
New reports are shedding light on the role the Obama administration is currently playing in regards to the conflict between the U.S. and Iran. One America's Jack Posobiec has the details. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZHiXfWGhPvU&feature=share&fbclid=IwAR02wFhVs9fOiA_Mxy4QB_nWgeuBy-nacQ3ahhYLOkbMjLxTJJNk8Q_YPiI&app=desktop
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 62787
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 74
Location : Wales UK

http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

OBAMA AGAIN  - Page 2 Empty Re: OBAMA AGAIN

Post  Admin on Sun 23 Jun 2019, 11:40 pm

https://www.teaparty247.org/obama-gets-media-pass-as-allegations-surface-he-deleted-tens-of-thousands-of-national-archive-documents/
Obama Gets Media Pass As Allegations Surface He Deleted Tens Of Thousands Of National Archive Documents

(Tea Party 247) – The Democrats have a real problem with corruption and the mainstream media is happy to play along and assist when necessary. The leaders of the Left have made it a habit to just destroy evidence that could prove they aren’t the innocent, pro-American politicians their voter base thinks they are. Clinton deleted over 30,000 emails and still has yet to be held accountable and now it appears Obama destroyed tens of thousands of record from the National Archives.

You won’t find this story being reported by the likes of “news” networks like CNN or MSNBC. Blatant corruption going unreported. We should be used to it by now.

In a report last year, by the Western Journal:

“Lipscomb wrote that “the accumulation of recent congressional testimony has made it clear that the Obama administration itself engaged in the wholesale destruction and ‘loss’ of tens of thousands of government records covered under the act as well as the intentional evasion of the government records recording system by engaging in private email exchanges.”

…”In 2014 President Obama signed the Presidential and Federal Records Act Amendments. For the first time electronic government records were placed under the 1950 Federal Records Act. The new law also included updates clarifying “the responsibilities of federal government officials when using non-government email systems” and empowering “the National Archives to safeguard original and classified records from unauthorized removal.” Additionally, it gives the Archivist of the United States the final authority in determining just what is a government record.”

So in other words, Obama signed an amendment to an existing law that protects federal records to include electronic records. Now it seems as though Obama himself has been “deleting” records just like his good friend Hillary Clinton. The law dictates that the Archivist of the United States gets to determine what is a government record but apparently Obama decided to take the liberty of deciding himself.

It is very interesting, in light of this information, when we look back and recall Obama saying that his administration didn’t have any embarrassing scandals.

“Former President Barack Obama, speaking off-the-record, talked about the drama-free nature of his White House and said it was a “low bar” now to avoid embarrassing presidential scandals..” (Reason, Feb.27, 2018)

Could that be because the evidence of any scandals was destroyed? How is the media not in a frenzy over this? If Trump had destroyed a fraction of what Obama did he would have been hung up and left to dry by the media, Congress would be holding special hearings, the FBI would be indicting him, and Nancy Pelosi and Maxine Waters would be foaming at the mouth as they pursued impeachment.

Yet Obama gets radio silence. Nothing from the media at all. What obvious double standards.

According to a report by RealClearPolitics,

“Clearly, America’s National Archives is facing the first major challenge to its historic role in preserving the records of the United States. What good is the National Archives administering a presidential library, like the planned Obama library in Chicago, if it is missing critical records of interest to scholars? And what’s to prevent evasion of the entire federal records system by subsequent administrations to suit current politics rather than serve scholars for centuries to come?

Isn’t that the crux of the issue? The Dems are so desperate to change history they will do anything. They change history to suit their narratives and policy goals and now they are attempting to delete history because it implicates them in all manner of corruption.

What more is it going to take for people to wake up and see just how corrupt the Left really is?
Admin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 62787
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 74
Location : Wales UK

http://worldwidechristians.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

OBAMA AGAIN  - Page 2 Empty Re: OBAMA AGAIN

Post  Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 2 of 3 Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum