World Wide Christians Partner with Jesus' Place/
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Who is online?
In total there are 9 users online :: 0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 9 Guests :: 2 Bots


[ View the whole list ]

Most users ever online was 115 on Wed 03 Jul 2019, 3:20 pm
Latest topics
ATLAS SHRUGS - PAMELA GELLER - Page 6 EmptyYesterday at 10:01 pm by Admin

» R.D SOUZA Saved by faith
ATLAS SHRUGS - PAMELA GELLER - Page 6 EmptyYesterday at 8:26 pm by Admin

ATLAS SHRUGS - PAMELA GELLER - Page 6 EmptyYesterday at 8:24 pm by Admin

» Daily Disciples
ATLAS SHRUGS - PAMELA GELLER - Page 6 EmptyYesterday at 8:19 pm by Admin

ATLAS SHRUGS - PAMELA GELLER - Page 6 EmptyYesterday at 8:16 pm by Admin

ATLAS SHRUGS - PAMELA GELLER - Page 6 EmptyYesterday at 8:07 pm by Admin

ATLAS SHRUGS - PAMELA GELLER - Page 6 EmptyYesterday at 7:47 pm by Admin

» servant @ TWO LISTENERS
ATLAS SHRUGS - PAMELA GELLER - Page 6 EmptyYesterday at 7:40 pm by Admin

»  HONEST REPORTING Defending Israel from Media Bias plz read REGULAR UPDATES
ATLAS SHRUGS - PAMELA GELLER - Page 6 EmptyYesterday at 1:49 pm by Admin

» Bayo Afolaranmi (Pastor).
ATLAS SHRUGS - PAMELA GELLER - Page 6 EmptySun 18 Oct 2020, 8:52 pm by Admin

»  So You Think You Can Lose It?
ATLAS SHRUGS - PAMELA GELLER - Page 6 EmptySun 18 Oct 2020, 8:27 pm by Admin

ATLAS SHRUGS - PAMELA GELLER - Page 6 EmptySun 18 Oct 2020, 8:20 pm by Admin

ATLAS SHRUGS - PAMELA GELLER - Page 6 EmptySun 18 Oct 2020, 8:15 pm by Admin

» Joe Biden Smoking Gun
ATLAS SHRUGS - PAMELA GELLER - Page 6 EmptySun 18 Oct 2020, 8:09 pm by Admin

ATLAS SHRUGS - PAMELA GELLER - Page 6 EmptySun 18 Oct 2020, 5:44 pm by Admin

ATLAS SHRUGS - PAMELA GELLER - Page 6 EmptySat 17 Oct 2020, 9:31 pm by Admin

ATLAS SHRUGS - PAMELA GELLER - Page 6 EmptySat 17 Oct 2020, 9:20 pm by Admin

» NUGGET Today's Devotional
ATLAS SHRUGS - PAMELA GELLER - Page 6 EmptySat 17 Oct 2020, 9:18 pm by Admin

» +Dev+ Michael D. Inman Pastor
ATLAS SHRUGS - PAMELA GELLER - Page 6 EmptySat 17 Oct 2020, 9:15 pm by Admin

ATLAS SHRUGS - PAMELA GELLER - Page 6 EmptySat 17 Oct 2020, 3:48 pm by Admin



Page 6 of 16 Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7 ... 11 ... 16  Next

Go down


Post  Admin on Mon 16 Jan 2017, 3:00 pm
Obama Slams Israel for Stalling Talks on ‘Effective, Contiguous Palestinian State’
By Cheryl Chumley - on January 16, 2017
President Obama, in what’s very likely his last televised interview on “60 Minutes” on CBS News, denied any sort of U.S.-Israeli breakdown in warm relations under his administration – but then slammed the Jewish state for what he described as tossing away any chance for peace with the Palestinian people.
President Obama in one of his final television interviews turned critical eyes toward Israel and faulted the Jewish state for settlement building.
Specifically, Obama said Israel’s settlements have “gotten so substantial” that they are preventing any chance to forge an “effective, contiguous Palestinian state,” he said.

The Daily Mail has the story:

“Speaking to CBS’ 60 Minutes, Obama dismissed the idea that there is a ‘major rupture’ in the relationship between the United States and Israel after last month’s decision by the U.S. to abstain from a United Nations vote condemning Israeli settlements.

“‘Because of our investment in the region, and because we care so deeply about Israel, I think (the U.S.) has a legitimate interest in saying to a friend, ‘This is a problem,’ Obama said.

“‘It would have long-term consequences for peace and security in the region, and the United States.'”
Israel’s settlements are on land captured after the Six-Day War in 1967 with Egypt, Jordan and Syria and the armies of Lebanon.

The United Nations, pressed by Palestinians and governments unfriendly to Israel, has since maintained a political view the Jewish state does not rightly belong on the property.

Again, from the Daily Mail:

“Most countries view the settlements as an obstacle to peace. Israel disagrees, citing a biblical, historical and political connection to the land, as well as security interests. Washington considers the settlement activity illegitimate.

“The Obama administration clashed with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government in late December after the US broke with a longstanding approach of diplomatically shielding Israel.

“The US abstained on a UN Security Council resolution that declared Israeli settlements in the West Bank criminal in nature. It passed with 14 countries in favor and none against.

“In response, Netanyahu accused the Obama administration of not just abandoning its customary U.N veto, but authoring the resolution.”
Donald Trump, meanwhile, has taken a decided stance in favor of Israel. He’s tweeted support for the Jewish state, telling Israelites to “stay strong” and reminding January 20 and his rise to the White House “is fast approaching” and reminding Obama’s on his way out.

Posts : 66613
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 75
Location : Wales UK

Back to top Go down


Post  Admin on Sun 15 Jan 2017, 11:17 pm

UN: Target Islamic Terror NOT Israel Protest- NYC
By Pamela Hall - on January 15, 2017
Thursday, January 12 at 12:30 PM and the Stand United With Israel demonstration outside the French
Mission to the UN was protesting the upcoming January 15 Paris “peace” conference. A crowd of 100’s UNited
with Israel, sending a strong message prior to the Mid- East Summit in Paris being held on January 15th.

“We will NOT allow the UN and her gang of Israel haters to target Israel unjustifiably!”

“NO MORE anti-Israel documents or resolutions!”“The UN’s attempt to revise and erase Jewish history is

“We call on the UN to focus on REAL issues such as Syrian
Genocide and Global Islamic Terror instead of vilifying
Israel unjustly.”

Leading the event was Hillary Markowitz, who after brief comments, introduced Jeffrey Wiesenfeld. I wasn’t able to stay for all of the speakers , but Wiesenfled led the way with a an impassioned but eloquent speech.

An excerpt from AFSI Co-Executive Director Helen Freedman comments at the rally:

Let me tell you how the Israelis are handling the despicable UNSC 2334, Kerry’s speech, the upcoming Paris Conference and the threatened action in the UN next Tuesday. I just returned from a trip to Israel with Governor Huckabee which was an affirmation of Israel’s rights as a Sovereign nation. We went to the Old City of Jerusalem, to Amona, Maaleh Adumim, Hebron, and Sderot, the so-called “occupied” places that are blamed for the failure of the “peace process”. Concern that declaring sovereignty over Judea and Samaria, and moving the US embassy to Jerusalem would be “burying the prospects of a PA state” is ignorant and meaningless, at the same time that Israel buries its young victims of terror and the PA world celebrates.

The Israelis are understandably counting the days and minutes until the Trump inauguration.

“Support Israel – Freedom and Democracy- NOT ISLAMIC TERRORISM!”
And one last statement from Helen Freedman ( and her Letter to the Editor
at the NY Post on “Undoing UN Resolution 2334”

The Post’s Jan. 9 “Fast Take” on “How Trump Can Undo Kerry’s Jerusalem Damage”
is right on the money. Eugene Kontorovich lists five ways of negating Security Council
Resolution 2334, which condemns Israel for just about everything – and Kerry’s speech
which labels Israel the great “occupier.” In order to erase these blights, the Trump
administration should follow through on its promises regarding Israel.

First and foremost is the recognition that Israel is not “occupying” its own land, that the
communities in Judea and Samaria are legal. The Edmond Levy report is just one legal
paper with those findings. The ongoing effort in Israel today is to apply sovereignty to
all of Israel so as to put an end to claims of illegal “occupation.”

Despite Kerry’s warning that moving the U.S. Embassy to Jerusalem would inflame the
Middle East, giving tacit encouragement to Israel’s enemies, the U.S. embassy should
certainly join those of Costa Rica and El Salvador in Israel’s capital city. As Kontorovich
suggests, in addition it should be moved to “a few hundred meters over the imaginary
line across which the UN says Jews may not go,” thereby straddling eastern and western
Jerusalem and tacitly proclaiming that the city is undivided and will remain that way.

Kontorovich makes other excellent suggestions, all of which strengthen Israel and invalidate
much of the UN’s venom. My suggestion is that the U.S. remove all funding from the U.N.
and encourage it to leave NYC. It would be great to have that beautiful waterfront property
returned to New Yorkers.

Posts : 66613
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 75
Location : Wales UK

Back to top Go down


Post  Admin on Sat 14 Jan 2017, 11:20 pm

Army deployed’ as massive anti-terror police launch raid in Molenbeek, Belgium
By Pamela Geller - on January 14, 2017
Mollebeek, a Muslim enclave and a hotbed of jihad terrorism. These enclaves continue to increase and populate countries all across Europe.

It was in Molenbeek that the Paris jihad mass murderers hid out safely for weeks, shielded by the Islamic terror underground.

By Joey Millar, The Express, Jan 14, 2017

While it is unclear how many officers are involved in the raid, a police helicopter is currently hovering over the area.

Several streets remain closed by police following the start of the raid at around 6.15pm local time (7.15pm GMT).

Belgian historian Pieter Van Ostaeyen reported the army has been deployed in the area.
Related articles

He tweeted: “#Molenbeek Brussels 4 or more houses searched by police forces. Increased presence of military and police reported #Belgium”

Brussels police, however, refused to say who they were targetting in the raids.

A spokeswoman said: “Several raids are being carried out as part of an investigation into terrorist activities.”

The neighbourhood in Brussels has become asssociated with extremism in recent years.
Three terrorists believed to be involved in the Paris attacks of November 2015 had grown up and lived in the area.

Salah Abdeslam, one of the suspects, was captured in March last year in a shoot-out with police.

Damage seen inside the departure terminal following the March 22, 2016 bombing at Zaventem Airport.

Posts : 66613
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 75
Location : Wales UK

Back to top Go down


Post  Admin on Fri 13 Jan 2017, 11:12 pm
MI5 Hunts Syrian Scientist Posing as Refugee and Plotting Chemical Attack
By Cheryl Chumley - on January 10, 2017
Britain’s intelligence agents are hunting a Syrian scientist who came to the country under the guise of being a refugee but who is now believed to be plotting a chemical attack on a seaside town.

From the UK Daily Mail:
“Counter-terrorism police raided a migrant centre in Berlin the day after the Christmas market truck massacre and are said to have recovered documents detailing the planned attack.

“They allegedly contained detailed of various chemical agents and included the name of two English towns.

“The suspect, said to be in his early 30s, has gone off the radar and it is feared he could be in the UK, according to the Sunday Express.”
Investigators apparently discovered documents during a Tempelhof airport raid that were so serious MI5 were called to the scene.

Tempelhof has been closed to house refugees and serve as the city’s largest camp.
Tempelhof airport has been closed for some time.
Again, from the UK Daily Mail:

“It is thought officers are searching both named targets, and one of them is described as a ‘seaside town on the south coast’.

“Potential targets could include Brighton and Hove, Dover, Bournemouth or Torquay.

“US authorities have been following the man since he left Damascus, according to the Sunday Express, and it has been claimed British officials were told previously about a Syrian scientist posing as a migrant.

“The paper claims the scientist went rogue having been a a vital cog in President Assad’s chemical attacks.”

Posts : 66613
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 75
Location : Wales UK

Back to top Go down


Post  Admin on Mon 19 Dec 2016, 8:15 pm

Muslim Group Recruiting for ISIS SUES Germany Over Quran Distribution Ban
By Pamela Geller - on December 19, 2016
The Muslim group that is suing the German government is a jihadi organization inciting to holy war. A couple of weeks ago German authorities launched a counter-terror operation against this Islamic group. Their members were recruiting young Muslims to the Islamic State. Last month, police swooped on around 200 apartments, offices, mosques and a warehouse – where they seized numerous pieces of evidence.

As is their wont, this jihadi group, “True Religion,” registered as a social work entity, zakat (charity), typical of Islamic deceit (see Holy Land Foundation). The work of this “charity” was distributing the Quran in pedestrianized areas and public squares across the country, “bridging the gap between the West and Islam.”

“The organization brings Islamic jihadists together under the pretext of the harmless distribution of the Quran,” German Interior Minister Thomas de Maizière told reporters in Berlin. He added that the ban had “nothing to do with the alleged freedom of religion.”

Now they are suing the German government. Litigation jihad. We know it well. And we know how liberal judges rule.

Especially when policy is incoherent: “Handing out the Koran is not banned, since it’s like handing out the bible, but misusing this practice to propagate Islamism is banned.”



Pallets of Qurans stored in warehouse of ISIS grup

Muslim group to SUE over Koran ban after being accused of recruiting ISIS jihadist

THE HEAD of a German organisation has lashed out against a ban prohibiting members from distributing copies of the Koran after authorities accused it of recruiting jihadists to fight with Islamic State (ISIS).

By Vickiie Oliphant and Monika Pallenberg, The Express, December 18, 2016
The group, which calls itself True Religion (DWR), began distributing free copies and translations of the Islamic religious book alongside the slogan ‘LIES’ in 2011, but have been active for as long as 11 years.
Set up by Palestinian-preacher Ibrahim Abou Nagie, the organisation advocates a return to the “true Islam” and members have been recorded publicly denouncing democracy as the enemy to Islamic values.
But four weeks ago, the group was banned by German interior minister Thomas de Maiziere after he accused the organisation of radicalising young members .
The group began handing out free copies of the Quran in 2011
True Religion has not been accused of any links to terrorism in Germany or on European soil.But it has faced allegations that it has deliberately set out to radicalise young German men and women, and encourage them to travel to Syria and Iraq to join ISIS and other extreme jihadist groups.As many as 140 youths have already left for the Middle East to join the extremists after becoming involved with True Religion, according to the interior minister.
As many as 140 members have already left for the Middle East to join ISIS
Mr de Maiziere made it clear the True Religion ban was not a ban on Muslim groups or the Quran
Mr de Maiziere said: “We don’t want terrorism in Germany, and we don’t want to export terrorism.”Last month, police swooped on around 200 apartments, offices, mosques and a warehouse – where they seized numerous pieces of “evidence”, although no one was arrested during the raids.The interior minister stressed the ban is not a move to ban Islamic beliefs, nor distribution of the Koran.
He said: “The ban is not for the Islam belief in general, muslim life has a secure place in German society, freedom of religion is for everyone.

“Handing out the Koran is not banned, since it’s like handing out the bible, but misusing this practice to propagate Islamism is banned.”

One of the places stormed during the raid’s was an apartment in a high-rise building in Bonn where the sect’s leader Mr Abou-Nagie, 52, lives.

He was hauled out of bed and off for questioning along with hate preacher Said El Emrani 34, who goes by the name Abu Dujana.

Posts : 66613
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 75
Location : Wales UK

Back to top Go down


Post  Admin on Mon 12 Dec 2016, 11:43 am

Robert Spencer: The SPLC’s “Terror from the Right” Deception
By Robert Spencer - on December 11, 2016
SPLCPulse club Orlando Florida

The Daily Caller reported Thursday that “the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) considers the Orlando nightclub shooting, an ISIS-inspired attack that left 49 dead, a right-wing plot, along with the shootings of police officers by anti-white terrorists.”

The SPLC’s list, “Terror from the Right,” claims to be “a synopsis of radical-right terrorist plots, conspiracies and racist rampages,” but it includes Islamic jihadist Omar Mateen’s massacre at the Pulse nightclub in Orlando.

As Mateen was doing his killing, he paused several times to call 911. Among his statements as he was murdering 49 people: “I pledge my allegiance to [unidentifiable name] on behalf of the Islamic State…Call me Mujahideen…my name is Islamic soldier.”

As far as the Southern Poverty Law Center is concerned, that’s “Terror from the Right.” Remember that the next time you hear someone say that attacks from “right-wing extremists” are more common than attacks from Islamic jihadists.

What’s ironic is that it was the Orlando jihad massacre that exploded the common lie (which still circulates) that “right-wing extremists” are responsible for more murders in the United States than Islamic jihadists. Georgetown University professor Engy Abdelkader recently appeared on Tucker Carlson’s Fox show and made the outlandish claim that the FBI had said that “white supremacist groups” were more of a terror threat than Islamic jihadists.

The FBI made no such claim; in reality, it originated with far-Left pressure groups. Back in June 2015, the George Soros-funded New America Foundation published a study that garnered enthusiastic international publicity, as it purported to demonstrate that “right-wing extremists” and “white supremacists” were a larger threat to the U.S. than Islamic jihadis.

The mainstream media was thrilled. Mediaite crowed: “White Americans Are Biggest Terror Threat in U.S.” The New York Times exulted: “Homegrown Extremists Tied to Deadlier Toll Than Jihadists in U.S. Since 9/11.” The Huffington Post cheered: “White Supremacists More Dangerous To America Than Foreign Terrorists, Study Says.” NPR rejoiced: “Right-Wing Extremists More Dangerous Than Islamic Terrorists In U.S.” TruthDig was thrilled: “White Right-Wing Terrorists Are Biggest Threat to Americans, Study Finds.” And on and on.

The media delight stemmed from the fact that the study confirmed its biases and relentless endeavor to downplay and deny the jihad threat. Thus the New York Times and NPR and the rest were not in the least interested in the fact that the New America Foundation study was obviously skewed, as it was based on the number of those killed by jihadis and by right-wing extremists since September 12, 2001, leaving out 9/11. The study also ignored the many, many foiled jihad plots, and the fact that jihadis are part of an international movement that has killed many thousands of people, while right-wingers and white supremacists are not. It stated that right-wing extremists had killed 48 people from September 12, 2001 to June 2015, while Islamic jihadists had killed only 26 people in the U.S. in that span. If 9/11 had been added, the tally would have been 3,032 killed by Islamic jihadists and 48 by purported right-wing extremists.

But all right, let’s play by the New America Foundation’s rules.

Posts : 66613
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 75
Location : Wales UK

Back to top Go down


Post  Admin on Thu 08 Dec 2016, 7:42 pm
Obama Defends Islam, Blames America for Fueling ‘Terrorist Narrative’
By Cheryl Chumley - on December 8, 2016

President Obama tipped his delusionary hat during a speech in Tampa, Florida, this week, telling the assembled crowd that Islam ought not to be slandered as a religion that fosters terrorism, and in fact, it’s America’s failures to recognize “good patriotic Muslims” that’s fueling violence.

Some in the saner world of thinking might say tying the two together is calling a spade a spade, as based on historical evidence.

It'd be nice if President Obama would stop blaming America for fueling terrorism and finally admit, before he leaves office, that Islam actually promotes such violence.
It’d be nice if President Obama would stop blaming America for fueling terrorism and finally admit, before he leaves office, that Islam actually promotes such violence.
But not Obama.

As Breitbart reported:
“Obama said, ‘We are fighting terrorists who claim to fight on behalf of Islam. but they do not speak for over a billion Muslims around the world. And they do not speak for American Muslims, including many who wear the uniform of the United States of America’s military. If we stigmatize good patriotic Muslims, that just feeds the terrorist narrative. It fuels the same false grievances that they use to motivate people to kill.'”
Can this man leave office soon enough?

He wasn’t done with his admonitions yet. Again, Breitbart:

“‘If we act like this is a war between the United States and Islam, we’re not just going to lose more Americans to terrorist attacks, but we’ll also lose sight of the very principles we claim to defend,’ he continued. ‘So let me final words to you as your commander in chief, be a reminder of what it is you’re fighting for, what it is that we are fighting for. The United States of America is not a country that imposes religious tests as a price for freedom. We’re a country that was founded so that people could practice their faiths as they choose. The United States of America is not a place where some citizens have to withstand greater scrutiny or carry a special ID card or prove that they’re not an enemy from within.'”

Posts : 66613
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 75
Location : Wales UK

Back to top Go down


Post  Admin on Sun 04 Dec 2016, 11:42 pm

Robert Spencer: If Trump Proposal Had Been In Place, OSU Jihad Attack Wouldn’t Have Happened
By Robert Spencer - on December 4, 2016
MUSLIM IMMIGRATIONabdul-ohio-state
Muslim “refugee” and Ohio State University student Abdul Razak Ali Artan last week set off a fire alarm on campus, the drove his car into the crowd of students evacuating the building. Then he jumped out of his car and began stabbing people with a butcher knife. This latest jihad attack on American soil vindicates President-elect Trump on Muslim immigration.

After the attack, Trump tweeted: “ISIS is taking credit for the terrible stabbing attack at Ohio State University by a Somali refugee who should not have been in our country.” Indeed, not only should Artan not have been in the country, but if the proposals that Trump has advanced regarding Muslim immigration had been in place, he would not have been, and the attack at Ohio State University would never have happened.

Trump has called for a temporary moratorium on immigration from countries that are hotbeds of jihad terror activity. reported that “Artan was a Somali refugee and Ohio State student who left his homeland with his family in 2007. They lived in Pakistan before coming to the U.S., where Artan became a permanent resident in 2014.”

Somalia and Pakistan: two epicenters of the global jihad. If Trump had been President and his ban had been in place, Abdul Razak Ali Artan would never have entered the United States at all.

This sensible approach to Muslim immigration is long overdue. Back in 2008, I wrote this in my book Stealth Jihad, among my proposals for how the jihad, both violent and stealthy, could be stymied in the United States:

End Muslim immigration to the United States. This is a simple matter of national security. Immigration policy must work toward the integration of all immigrants, and the all-encompassing societal program of sharia makes the integration of pious Muslims ultimately impossible. While there are undoubtedly millions of Muslims who have no interest in jihad either by violence or stealth, no Islamic authorities anywhere in the world have declared heretical or in any way unacceptable the idea that non-Muslims must be fought against by various means and subjugated under the rule of Islamic law. Unless and until that begins to happen, no one can be sure of the sentiments of any individual believer. Consequently, simply to protect ourselves, there should be an end to Muslim immigration, combined with a clear notice to Muslims in the United States that any action on behalf of sharia supremacism is unacceptable.

But ending Muslim immigration to America must be considered a long-term goal, since such a measure is impossible in today’s political climate. The proposal would inevitably be denounced as “racist,” despite the fact that jihadist supremacism is not a race. But at the very least, immigration officials should immediately adopt a program to screen Muslims entering the United States for jihadist sentiments. This will provide grounds for deportation if an entrant renounces some aspect of sharia supremacism on his immigration application and then works for it once in the country.
At the time, this proposal was greeted with derision, or worse. Even in FrontPage Magazine, which is singular in recognizing the nature and magnitude of the jihad threat, then-managing editor Ben Johnson wrote: “Analyzing the problem is one thing; solving it is another. Spencer’s prescriptions on what to do will rankle some and lead to his further character assassination. He is at his best when calling for the government to impose existing laws – and most gets to the point when he calls for a revival of patriotism, the self-assurance necessary to deny Islamic encroachment, white liberal guilt, and multiculturalist recriminations of the greatest nation in the history of the world. He is at his most questionable in calling on the government to ‘End Muslim immigration into the United States.’”

Trump has changed all that, to the extent that now, even the tired, pusillanimous, cowardly “conservative” establishment, late to the party as always, as always leading from behind, is catching up. Back in January 2016, National Review denounced Trump for, among other things, his suggestion that there should be a temporary moratorium on Muslim immigration: “Not since George Wallace has there been a presidential candidate who made racial and religious scapegoating so central to his campaign. Trump launched his campaign talking about Mexican rapists and has gone on to rant about mass deportation, bans on Muslim immigration, shutting down mosques, and building a wall around America. America is an exceptional nation in large part because we’ve aspired to rise above such prejudices and guarantee life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness to everyone.”

But after the OSU jihad attack, National Review published an article entitled “It’s Time for Honest Talk about Muslim Immigrationm,” saying: “Some immigrants from jihad zones will be involved in murdering Americans. Is this an acceptable price for compassion?”

That was always the concern. The time for National Review’s previous tardy and pallid me-tooism is long past. Abdul Razak Ali Artan proved that. How many more of them must there be before sane immigration policies are implemented?

Robert Spencer is the director of Jihad Watch and author of the New York Times bestsellers The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades) and The Truth About Muhammad. His latest book is The Complete Infidel’s Guide to Iran.

Posts : 66613
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 75
Location : Wales UK

Back to top Go down


Post  Admin on Sat 03 Dec 2016, 11:08 pm
More fake news found on CBS Nightly News
By Larry Estavan - on December 2, 2016
CBS Nightly News shows what appears to be a staged incident brought by way of the White Helmets: “Syrian military continues assault on Aleppo,” CBS News, November 30, 2016.

The White Helmets is a faux NGO that is in reality a propaganda arm of the al Nusra Front. Although the White Helmets are presented as a humanitarian organization, there is massive evidence of them collaborating with al Nusra. The White Helmets have been discussed on The Geller Report here, but they have also been exposed by Global Research, Counter Punch, and Vanessa Beeley.

That’s right, the very same people who blubber about the Palestinians, and “institutionalized racism” in America, hate the White Helmets. That’s how bad they are.

And how bad is the Nusra Front? Nusra was among the “rebels” who hid in the Palestinian refugee camp in Syria. The Syrian government surrounded the camp in Yarmouk in response. The Nusra Front choose to continue hiding in the camp, and let the Palestinians starve to death as a result.

Palestinians starved to death by al Nusra Front
That’s how bad they are.

Yet, despite this, CBS has failed to get the memo. It is getting hard to accept this is just an accident. CBS’ bias in favor of the Muslim Brotherhood and jihad is becoming hard to ignore. There was the CBS piece praising the Muslim Brotherhood–connected Scout leader,

another burnishing the image of the man who mocked the Charlie Hebdo murders,
as well as one endorsing BLM rhetoric, and a lot about the White Helmets.

Will CBS learn its lesson about reporting fake news, Muslim Brotherhood propaganda, and sympathy for jihadists? The answer appears to be as long as Obama remains in office, they will continue to push for aid to al Qaeda in Syria, which is what al Nusra is.

What CBS News does during a Trump presidency remains to be seen, but as Pamela Geller points out here, the internet may very well kill the network news star.

Posts : 66613
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 75
Location : Wales UK

Back to top Go down


Post  Admin on Sat 03 Dec 2016, 2:57 pm
Trump makes history with phone call to longtime ally, Taiwan
By Pamela Geller - on December 2, 2016
rump’s call to Taiwan was magnificent. I never cottoned to Nixon throwing our great ally Taiwan under the bus at the command of communist China. It was wrong. This call is long overdue. Viva la Trump!

It’s a gorgeous move — and the left is frothing at the mouth, of course.
Trump risks showdown with China after call with Taiwan

CNN International
Donald Trump risks China rift with Taiwan call
Financial Times
Trump Speaks With Taiwan’s Leader, an Affront to China
By Mark Lander, NY Times, DEC. 2, 2016
President-elect Donald J. Trump at the Carrier plant in Indianapolis on Thursday. Credit Doug Mills/The New York Times

WASHINGTON — President-elect Donald J. Trump spoke by telephone with Taiwan’s president on Friday, a striking break with nearly four decades of diplomatic practice that could precipitate a major rift with China even before Mr. Trump takes office.

Mr. Trump’s office said he spoke with the Taiwanese president, Tsai Ing-wen, “who offered her congratulations.”

President Tsai Ing-wen of Taiwan. Credit Ritchie B. Tongo/European Pressphoto Agency
He is believed to be the first president or president-elect who has spoken to a Taiwanese leader since 1979, when the United States severed diplomatic ties with Taiwan after its recognition of the People’s Republic of China.

In the statement, Mr. Trump’s office said the two leaders noted that “close economic, political, and security ties” exist between Taiwan and the United States. The statement also said Mr. Trump “congratulated President Tsai on becoming president of Taiwan earlier this year.”

The White House was not told about Mr. Trump’s call until after it happened, according to a senior administration official. The official spoke on ground rules of anonymity to discuss sensitive diplomatic relations.

But the potential fallout from the conversation was significant, the administration official said, noting that the Chinese government issued a bitter protest after the United States sold weapons to Taiwan as part of a well-established arms agreement.

Mr. Trump’s call with President Tsai is a far bigger provocation, though the Chinese government did not issue an immediate response. Beijing views Taiwan as a breakaway province and has adamantly opposed the attempts of any country to open official relations with it.

Posts : 66613
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 75
Location : Wales UK

Back to top Go down


Post  Admin on Sun 20 Nov 2016, 10:46 pm
Canada Muslim teen wrote on Twitter: “Use a bomb, a knife, a gun or car hashtag ISIS”
By Pamela Geller - on November 20, 2016
While the enemedia inundates us with fake news about “white nationalists,” this is what is really happening, all over North America and Europe.
“‘I regret what I’ve done’: Manitoba teen charged in terrorism case,” by Josh Crabb, CTV News, November 15, 2016:

Chilling details of a Manitoba teen’s support for the terrorist group ISIS were heard in a Brandon courtroom Tuesday morning.

The teen is charged with a terrorism offence. In September, the teen pleaded guilty in Winnipeg to a charge of counselling the commission of an indictable offence for the benefit of, at the direction of or in association with a terrorist group….

A news reporter from the CBC contacted RCMP with a tip about a Twitter account indicating a teenager was planning to leave Canada to fight with ISIS.

Mahon told court the Twitter account provided was later found to belong to the youth.

Court heard the account contained messages of support for Hijrah, which involves migration to Syria or Iraq.

Court also heard the account contained a post which asked anyone who couldn’t make Hijrah to “strike from within.”

Mahon described the post in court; “It doesn’t matter how you do it, use a bomb, a knife, a gun or car hashtag ISIS.”

A search of the youth’s computer resulted in the discovery of terrorist images and propaganda.

Court heard the youth had also been in contact with a fighter from ISIS and that he had searched for the ISIS flag, ISIS video and ISIS messages on the computer….

Initially, the youth denied the Twitter account belonged to him, but later acknowledged to investigators it was his.

“He indicated he was planning to leave Canada to fight for the Islamic State,” Mahon told court. “He indicated if he was unable to travel, he would strike from within.”

“He was going to target government buildings, monuments, infrastructure such as electrical grids and federal employees.”

Mahon told court the youth indicated he conducted research to do this, and drawings and notebooks were seized by investigators….

When asked in court by the judge if he had anything to say the teen said, “I regret what I’ve done.”

“I was struggling with my identity. I’d like to apologize to my family for the stress that I’ve caused them, also to the Crown and police for using their resources and also for causing a stir in the community.”…
New FBI Stats 2015: Hate crimes against Jews 664; against Muslims 257
By Pamela Geller - on November 20, 2016
ADVANCING ISLAMIC LIESrefugee camps antisemitism
There is nothing in the establishment propaganda media about Jewish hate crimes, yet they’re over half of the total. All the enemedia tells us about is a supposed spike in “Islamophobia.” The actual statistics reveal the falsity of their propaganda narrative.

islamic jew hatred2

“2015 Hate Crime Statistics,” FBI (thanks to Christian):

…By bias motivation (Based on Table 1.)

An analysis of data for victims of single-bias hate crime incidents showed that:

59.2 percent of the victims were targeted because of the offenders’ bias against race/ethnicity/ancestry.

19.7 percent were victimized because of bias against religion.

17.7 percent were targeted because of bias against sexual orientation.

1.7 percent were victims of gender-identity bias.

1.2 percent were targeted because of bias against disability.

0.4 percent (30 individuals) were victims of gender bias….

Religious bias (Based on Table 1.)

Of the 1,402 victims of anti-religious hate crimes:

52.1 percent were victims of crimes motivated by their offenders’ anti-Jewish bias.

21.9 percent were victims of anti-Islamic (Muslim) bias.

4.3 percent were victims of anti-Catholic bias.

4.1 percent were victims of bias against groups of individuals of varying religions (anti-multiple religions, group).

3.6 percent were victims of anti-Eastern Orthodox (Russian, Greek, Other) bias.

3.4 percent were victims of anti-Protestant bias.

1.3 percent were victims of anti-Other Christian bias.

0.6 percent were victims of anti-Mormon bias.

0.4 percent were victims of anti-Hindu bias.

0.4 percent were victims of anti-Sikh bias.

0.1 percent were victims of anti-Jehovah’s Witness bias.

0.1 percent were victims of anti-Buddhist bias.

0.1 percent were victims of anti-Atheist/Agnostic bias.

7.6 percent were victims of bias against other religions (anti-other religion)….

Shocking Video - Radical Islams Children
Published on 21 Jul 2015
This horrific video precedes ISIS, warning the world of how cheap a child's life is in radical Islams fight with the West. Today we see ISIS Children trained with automatic weapons and groomed as suicide bombers. ISIS and radical Islams vision for children goes against every American instinct and value.

Posts : 66613
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 75
Location : Wales UK

Back to top Go down


Post  Admin on Sat 19 Nov 2016, 8:27 pm
Saudi Arabia warns Trump on blocking oil imports
By Pamela Geller - on November 18, 2016
The Saudis were planning on having another paid-for stooge in the White House. Instead, they have a President coming in who has vowed to create “complete energy independence” for the U.S. And so they’re already resorting to “warnings,” i.e., veiled threats.


“Saudi Arabia warns Trump on blocking oil imports,” by Pilita Clark, Financial Times, November 15, 2016:

Saudi Arabia has warned Donald Trump that the incoming US president will risk the health of his country’s economy if he acts on his election promises to block oil imports.

In a sign of the difficulties Mr Trump faces over his campaign pledges to create “complete American energy independence” from “our foes and the oil cartels”, Saudi Arabia’s energy minister pointedly reminded the president-elect that the US “benefits more than anybody else from global free trade”, adding, “energy is the lifeblood of the global economy”.

“At his heart President-elect Trump will see the benefits and I think the oil industry will also be advising him accordingly that blocking trade in any product is not healthy,” Khalid al-Falih, who is also chairman of Aramco, the state-run oil company, told the Financial Times in Marrakesh, where he is leading Saudi Arabia’s delegation in UN climate talks….

Posts : 66613
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 75
Location : Wales UK

Back to top Go down


Post  Admin on Thu 10 Nov 2016, 5:25 pm
“I’m disappointed because Hillary Clinton is good for Pakistan and Muslims all over the world”
By Pamela Geller - on November 9, 2016
This says it all. Why would Muslims not rejoice in a candidate who has vowed to combat jihad terror? Could it be they support it?

This article is just one of the many Muslims-are-victims pieces to which the defeated mainstream media propagandists are treating us today. None of them contain any suggestions for containing or rolling back the jihad threat, or any recognition that people are suspicious of Islam because of jihad terror, not because of Donald Trump’s rhetoric.

“I am disappointed to see Donald Trump winning because Hillary Clinton is a good woman, she is good for Pakistan and Muslims all over the world.”

The problem is that what is good for the Islamic Republic of Pakistan is not necessarily good for free people, anywhere in the world.


Horror and fear swept through Muslim countries after Donald Trump was confirmed as President of the Unites States after months of anti-Islamic rhetoric.

The Republican made his most controversial remarks about Islam in December last year, sparking anger among the world’s 1.5billion followers of Islam when he called for a ban on Muslims entering the U.S. after a mass shooting in California.

Muslims across Asia were struggling this morning to accept the news the populist candidate will take office in the White House, saying that ISIS would be happy he won the presidency race.

‘Americans have just screwed the world yet again,’ said Syed Tashfin Chowdhury, a Bangladeshi who has several close friends in the US.

Thousands in the country watched in shock as the results rolled in and Facebook lit up with horrified reactions.

‘I’m very afraid, will there be more wars? Will America attack Muslim countries again?’ asked Indonesian activist Alijah Diete as Donald Trump edged closer to a shock victory in the US election….

Zuhairi Misrawi, an Islamic scholar from moderate Indonesian Islamic organisation Nahdlatul Ulama, reacted to the news by saying it would be seen as a powerplay for terrorists across the globe.

‘When the United States uses hard power, extremists gain a momentum,’ he said.

‘Those who will be the happiest when Trump wins are ISIS.’…

A teacher at a school in the United Arab Emirates told MailOnline when he broke the news of the result to his class, children told him they would never be able to go to America again.

He said: ‘It’s so sad. They are genuinely worried.

‘I didn’t think it would have this sort of affect.’

A senior Pakistani government official, speaking anonymously, called the news ‘absolutely atrocious and horrifying’ while others in the country also lamented the results.

‘I am disappointed to see Donald Trump winning because Hillary Clinton is a good woman, she is good for Pakistan and Muslims all over the world,’ said Ishaq Khan, 32, speaking at an Islamabad market.

‘She was talking about world peace – but Trump was talking about fighting against Muslims.’…

In Indonesia, the world’s most populous Muslim-majority country, there was growing nervousness about how the relationship with traditional ally the United States would shape up, and how a Trump presidency would affect relations between America and the Muslim world.

‘I am very concerned that the relationship between the US and Muslim countries will become tense again,’ said the female Muslim activist Diete, 47.

Nikken Suardini, who works for a law firm in the capital Jakarta, was concerned about the proposed Muslim ban, saying: ‘If he is elected president he will block Muslims from entering the US – well, that’s just not fair.’…

Tahir Ashrafi, a senior Pakistani government cleric, said: ‘We hope that Trump’s remarks against Muslims were only to boost his campaign and he will realise that Muslims are a large population in the U.S.’

A spokesman for Indonesian hardline group the Islamic Defenders’ Front said: ‘Muslims are foreigners to him.’

Posts : 66613
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 75
Location : Wales UK

Back to top Go down


Post  Admin on Sun 06 Nov 2016, 10:11 pm

Click address bar link below for map graphic and more
The Clinton Axis of Evil
ByPAMELA GELLER on November 5, 2016
Clinton Circle: MIT just released a fantastic tool based on the Wikileaks emails. This is what Clinton’s ‘circle of trust’ looks like from her emails.

The MIT Media Lab created a visualization showing connections between the tens of thousands of emails sent by the candidate from a private server when she was secretary of state.

Clinton Circle, a new analysis made by the Macro Connections group from MIT Media Lab is the first graphic proposal that shows the relationships behind email interactions and also, facilitates reading these emails. Using a tool they had previously created called Immersion, researchers loaded nearly 30,000 private mails sent or received from the Hillary Clinton email address–which have already been published by WikiLeaks.

Click here for live map:

The MIT Media Lab professor who launched this project is shocked that the media is ignoring, censoring the story. Shocked.

Cesar A. Hidalgo
With words I work. Faculty @ The MIT Media Lab
What I learned from visualizing Hillary Clinton’s emails
It all started early last week. Kevin Hu, one of my senior grad students, told me that a friend of his asked if we could use Immersion — an email visualization tool we had released in 2013 — to visualize Clinton’s Wikileaks email dataset.

The timing was not ideal for us. Kevin asked me this question when the Media Lab member event was getting started, which is a particularly busy time of the year. So my first question to Kevin was: “Can we?”

What made the project possible, besides Kevin’s amazing talents, was that we had reactivated the Immersion project a few weeks ago together with Jingxian Zhang, a new grad student in the group. Immersion had been paralyzed for two years since the students who had worked on it graduated. But Jingxian was now working to help complete the original vision of this project, and with her software engineering skills, visualizing the Wikileaks Clinton email dataset in Immersion was a possibility. So now that I knew we could do it, the question was: Should we?

Should questions are tough, especially when you need to consider a number of different variables. But before I tell you why I decided to move ahead with the project, I’ll try to make sure we are all on the same page about why this dataset is relevant.
The answer is quite simple, but also, not the one that you hear most often. Clinton’s emails are not relevant because they expose an alleged circle of corruption, or wrongdoing, as many conservatives claim. Her emails are also not irrelevant because they do not expose corruption or wrongdoing, as many liberals claim. These emails are relevant because Clinton was a person in charge of doing a security job, and anyone working on a security job is not supposed to communicate using an unsecured or unauthorized channel. This should be obvious, since each extra channel of communication increases the vulnerability of the system by increasing the probability that messages are intercepted. So the reason why Clinton’s emails are a big deal is because a person in charge of security should not be using an insecure channel, and those who argue from that perspective have a valid point.

Now, did Clinton actually reveal sensitive information? Whether she did or didn’t is a separate point from the one above, but also, one that we need to consider. Also, how are people supposed to learn about what was revealed in these messages? Should they blindly trust what the media tells them, or should they be allowed to evaluate this information themselves? And in a world where this information is already publicly available, but hard to digest, should we silence efforts that make this primary source of data available to citizens, or should we embrace them, as these efforts allow us to make our own conclusions by personally browsing the data?

For years I have created teams with unique capacities to make large datasets easy to understand. Earlier this year we released Data USA, the most comprehensive visualization of US public data. In 2013, we released a project visualizing the entire formal sector economy of Brazil ( My group also has been hosting a very popular tool to visualize international trade data ( since 2011 (see for a full list of projects). So in this environment, where I lead groups with the ability to make data easily digestible, and have a commitment to making data accessible so that people can explore it directly and make their own decisions, I decided that improving people’s ability to navigate a politically relevant dataset that was already publicly available was the right choice. My intuition was that, if you were going to spend 1, 5, or 10 minutes looking directly at these emails, you would get a slightly deeper understanding of what was in them if you used our interface rather than the ones that were presently available. I believe that these potential increases in depth, together with the creation of tools that allow people to explore primary sources of data directly, are a contribution. You may disagree with my choice, but I hope you at least understand it.

So what did we learn by making this dataset accessible?

We learned a few things about what Clinton’s emails said, about how the media works, and about how people interpreted the project.

We made publicly available last Friday night (October 28, 2016). We launched with a single story, written by Alejandra Vargas from Univision.

My intuition was that the story was likely to get picked up by other news sources. After all, the tool facilitated people’s ability to read and understand the content of these emails, and the connections of the people involved in them. But I was wrong—it has been nearly a week since we released the project and no other major news source has picked up the story, despite having been viewed by more than 300,000 people in less than a week.

So how did we get so much traffic without any news coverage? The answer is social media. So far, the tool has been shared widely on Twitter, Facebook, and for a brief but intense time, on Reddit. Its spread has been fueled by different motives, and also, has been battled in different ways.

Many reporters shared the news on their personal accounts understanding that the tool represents a different form of data reporting, or data journalism: one where people are provided with a tool that facilitates their ability to explore a relevant dataset, instead of being provided with a story summarizing a reporter’s description of that dataset.

Another group of people that shared the news were interface designers, who understand that there is a need to improve the tabular interface of present day email clients, and that the inbox we presented in this project was an attractive new alternative.

But many people also shared our site claiming that this was evidence of Clinton’s corruption, and that the site supported Trump. More on that later.

But the spread of the site was not without its detractors. A few hours after we released the site I received a message from a friend telling me that what I had done was “a huge mistake” and that I should have waited to post this until “later in the year.”

A few days later, outside my lab, a member of a neighboring research group called me a “Trump supporter” and told me that I should have only made that site available if it also included Trump’s emails. I told him that I would be happy to include them, but I had no access to the data. In haste, this colleague began emailing me news articles, none of which provided access to the alleged public dataset of Trump emails.

Later, a friend of one of my students posted the news on Reddit, where it went viral. And I mean really viral. It became the top story of the Internetisbeautiful subreddit, and made it to Reddit’s front page. It collected more than 3,000 upvotes and 700 comments. But as the story peaked, a moderator single-handedly removed it in an authoritarian move, and justified this unilateral silencing of the post by adding a rule banning “sites that serve a political agenda or that otherwise induce drama.” Of course, the rule was added AFTER the post was removed

So when it comes to media, social or not, I learned that providing information directly to people so that they can inspect it and evaluate it, is a value that many people consider second to supporting their preferred electoral choice. The twist is that I don’t support Trump. In fact, I don’t support him at all. I think he is potentially a threat to global security, and also, a candidate that has shown repeatedly to be a dividing rather than unifying force. He has failed to respect contracts numerous times, defrauding contractors; and he certainly has shown little respect for people’s development by creating a fraudulent university. So I think he is ill prepared for most jobs, including a difficult one like that of being president.

I support Clinton in this election, and even though I don’t get to vote (As a green card holder I just pay taxes), I want her to win next Tuesday. I really do. But I understand that this is my own personal choice, a choice that I want to make sure is informed by my ability to evaluate information about the candidates directly, and by a media that is more transparent than the one we now have. Trust me, if I had Trump’s tax records, I would also think it is a good idea to make a tool that makes them more easily digestible. But my reason to make that tool, once again, would not come from my support for Clinton, or my opposition to Trump. It would come from my support for a society where people have direct access to relevant sources of information through well-designed data visualization tools.

So what did I learn about Clinton’s emails? One of the advantages of helping design a data visualization tool is that you get an intimate understanding of the data you are visualizing. After all, you have to explore the data and use the tool to make dozens of design decisions. In this case, the development cycle was particularly fast, but nevertheless I got to learn a few things about the data.

Of course, the whole point of making this tool is that you can use it to come up with your own interpretation of the data. That said, you might be curious about mine, so I’ll share it with you too.

What I saw on Clinton’s emails was not surprising to me. It involved a relatively small group of people talking about what language to use when communicating with other people. Also, it involved many unresponded-to emails. Many conversations revolved around what words to use or avoid, and what topics to focus on, or how to avoid some topics, when speaking in public or in meetings. This is not surprising to me because I’ve met many politicians in my life, including a few presidents and dozens of ministers and governors, so I know that what work means to many people in this line of work, on a daily basis, is strategizing what to say and being careful about how to say it. I am sure that if we had access to Trump’s emails we would see plenty of the same behavior.

So what I got from reading some of Clinton’s email is another piece of evidence confirming my intuition that political systems scale poorly. The most influential actors on them are spending a substantial fraction of their mental capacity thinking about how to communicate, and do not have the bandwidth needed to deal with many incoming messages (the unresponded-to emails). This is not surprising considering the large number of people they interact with (although this dataset is rather small. I send 8k emails a year and receive 30k. In this dataset Clinton is sending only 2K emails a year).

Our modern political world is one where a few need to interact with many, so they have no time for deep relationships — they physically cannot. So what we are left is with a world of first impressions and public opinion, where the choice of words matters enormously, and becomes central to the job. Yet, the chronic lack of time that comes from having a system where few people govern many, and that leads people to strategize every word, is not Clinton’s fault. It is just a bug that affects all modern political systems, which are ancient Greek democracies that were not designed to deal with hundreds of millions of people.

On another note, this exercise also helped me reaffirm my belief that the best way to learn about the media is not by reading the news, but by being news. I’ve had the fortune, and misfortune, to have been news many times. This time, I honestly thought that we had a piece of content that some media channels would be interested in and that it would get picked up easily. I have many reporter friends who are enthusiastic about new forms of data journalism, and that actually have been positive and encouraging this week. So I imagined that there was a good chance that a reporter would see the site, go to his or her editor, and say: “Hey, I have an interactive data visualization of all Clinton’s emails. Can I write a story on it?” and the editor would say: “Of course, make it quick.” I don’t know if these conversations actually happened, but given the large volume of traffic our project received I would be surprised if they didn’t. I learned that the outcome was not the one I intuited.

And this brings me to my final point, which is that while I support Clinton in this election, and I think Trump is a bad choice for president (a really bad one), I still think that we should work on the creation of tools that improve the ability of people to personalize scrutinize politically relevant information. I now understand that much of the U.S. media may not share that view with me, and that I think this is an important point of reflection. I hope the media takes some time to think about this on November 9 (or the week after).

Also, the large number of people who were unable to interpret our tool as anything but an effort to support or oppose a political candidate — and that was true for both liberals and conservatives — speaks to me about an ineffective public sphere. And that’s something I think we should all be concerned about. This polarization is not just a cliché. It is a crippling societal condition that is expressed in the inability of people to see any merit, or any point, in opposing views. That’s a dangerous, and chronic, institutional disease that is expressed also in the inability of people to criticize their own candidates, because they fear being confused with someone their peers will interpret as a supporter of the opposing candidate. If you cannot see any merit in the candidate you oppose, even in one or two of the many points that have been made, you may have it.

So that’s how this election has muddled the gears of democracy. When we cannot learn from those we oppose, or agree when they have a valid point, our learning stops. We keep on talking past each other. I know that this election has made learning from those we oppose particularly difficult, but the difficult tests are the ones that truly show us what we are really made of. These are the situations that push us to see past all of the things that we don’t like, or don’t agree on, so we can rescue a lesson. You may not agree with me, but I hope at least I gave you something to think about.

César A. Hidalgo is associate professor of media arts and sciences at the MIT Media Lab and the author of Why Information Grows: The evolution of order from atoms to economies. He has also lead the creation of data visualization sites that have received more than 100 million views, including,,,,,, and others (see for more details).
- See more at:

Posts : 66613
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 75
Location : Wales UK

Back to top Go down


Post  Admin on Fri 04 Nov 2016, 12:48 pm

Security Guard Wounded In Garland ISIS Attack: “FBI RESPONSIBLE”
ByPAMELA GELLER on November 4, 2016
moe garland
The FBI was willing to allow Americans to be murdered. This is confirmation of the suspicions in an article at Breitbart last August:

It’s hard to escape the conclusion that the Obama FBI wanted me and the other speakers at the event dead. Dutch freedom fighter Geert Wilders was the keynote speaker; he has been living with armed guards for years for supposedly “insulting Islam.” My colleague Robert Spencer has received numerous death threats from Muslims. Cartoon contest winner Bosch Fawstin drew Muhammad. Did Obama’s pro-Islam FBI want us all dead?

What other conclusion can be reached?

I’ve been trying to get my mind around this thing. What was Obama trying to do? Teach Americans a lesson? Enforce the edict that he enunciated in the wake of the Benghazi jihad slaughter, that “the future must not belong to those to slander the prophet of Islam”?

If people had died at our Garland event, the murders would have had a blood-chilling effect on the freedom of speech in America. That, in my view, appears to have been what the Obama administration wanted — and certainly that’s what the enemedia wanted in the wake of our event, as it gleefully and relentlessly blamed us for violating Sharia blasphemy laws and getting shot at.


“Security Guard Wounded In ISIS Attack: ‘FBI Responsible,’” by J. D. Miles,, November 3, 2016 (thanks to Gage):

GARLAND (CBSDFW.COM) – The security guard who survived last year’s ISIS terrorist attack on the Culwell Center in Garland said not only are the terrorists responsible but so is the FBI for his injuries and the attack itself.

“I feel like they are not coming clean,” said Bruce Joiner about the FBI.

Joiner, 59, was the Garland school district security officer, shot in the leg by Elton Simpson and Nadir Soofi. The two ISIS recruits drove to the Culwell Center and started firing before they were killed by Garland Police. Joiner managed to help them stop Simpson and Soofi before they ever got close to the ballroom with about 200 people at a contest for cartoons of the Muslim prophet Muhammad. Joiner was treated at a hospital and released hours after suffering a lower leg wound.

But Joiner said there’s more to what happened that day. He has now claimed that three officers told him an undercover FBI agent was following terrorists in another vehicle.

“I know that there was a third person. I know he had his life saved by claiming he was an FBI agent,” said Joiner.

Joiner said Garland officers had guns pointed at the man dressed in Middle Eastern attire and quickly taken away by federal agents.

“He was detained put in the back of a squad car,” said Joiner. “They put a bag over his head and took him away to another location.”

But both the FBI and Garland Police have refused to confirm or deny that account.

Still Joiner is using that information as the basis for a possible lawsuit, accusing the FBI of allowing the violent plot to go forward.

“I think they allowed it to go too far,” said Joiner.

“They are responsible… they have an intentional tort on their hands,” said Trent Roberts, Joiner’s attorney.

Roberts said the government has stonewalled him about its undercover activities before the attack.

The FBI arrest affidavit stated that an undercover agent was tracking the terrorists for weeks even sending a text urging them to quote “tear up Texas.”

FBI Director James Comey said Garland was sent a bulletin three hours before the attack warning that someone could be on their way.

Joiner believes and may soon try to prove in court that the FBI could have stopped it but chose not to.

“I don’t know of any undercover agent that can allow their fellow officers and citizens to be fired upon in the course of an investigation you have to stop that before that happens,” said Joiner.

Joiner said were it not for the quick thinking of Garland SWAT officers he believes the FBI would have blood on its hands….

- See more at:

Posts : 66613
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 75
Location : Wales UK

Back to top Go down


Post  Admin on Wed 02 Nov 2016, 11:45 pm

Hillary Got $12 Million for Clinton Foundation As Quid Pro Quo For Meeting King of Morocco Who Also Gave $1 Million to Bill Clinton and Now Aids Paris Rapist
ByPAMELA GELLER on November 2, 2016
hillary hijab77
The Clintons: a deeply corrupt crime family bent on profit for themselves, and America be damned. If she becomes President, it will be disaster upon disaster.

“King of Morocco offers to pay legal costs of Arabic pop star accused of raping a woman at a Paris hotel,” by Hannah Al-othman, Mailonline, November 1, 2016 (thanks to Phil):

The Moroccan king has vowed to cover the legal fees of a pop singer who has been imprisoned in France charged with aggravated rape.

Saad Lamjarred, 31, a star in Morocco who is well known on the Arab pop music scene, was charged on Friday after he allegedly attacked a woman in his hotel room.

Following the star’s arrest, King Mohammed VI has said he will cover Lamjarred’s legal costs, Morocco’s official MAP news agency reported.

According to the Moroccan Embassy in Paris, the king wants French lawyer Eric Dupond Moretti, who is known for securing his clients’ acquittals, to defend the pop star, and has promised to pick up the bill.

The 20-year-old woman claims that Lamjarred attacked her in his hotel room near the Champs Elysees in Paris.

Lamjarred, who had been due to perform in Paris on Saturday, has been imprisoned in France while the investigation continues.

He was reportedly under the influence of both alcohol and drugs at the time of the alleged attack….

“WIKILEAKS: Hillary Got $12 Million for Clinton Charity As Quid Pro Quo For Morocco Meeting,” by Richard Pollock, Daily Caller, October 20, 2016 (thanks to Phil):

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton arranged a $12 million donation from Moroccan King Mohammed VI to her family’s charity in 2014 in return for the Clinton Global Initiative hosting its international meeting in the North African Muslim nation, according to an email made public Thursday by Wikileaks.

The Moroccan monarch’s funds went to the Clinton Foundation’s endowment and to CGI. The Jan. 18, 2015, email was included in Wikileaks’ latest batch of communications to and from Clinton’s presidential campaign chairman, John Podesta.

The email from Huma Abedin, Clinton’s Deputy Chief of Staff at the State Department, was addressed to Podesta and campaign manager Robby Mook. Hillary Clinton was a director of the foundation at the time.

Singapore and Hong Kong officials reportedly were also vying to convene the CGI meeting in their countries, but the North African nation ultimately hosted it in a five-star hotel in Marrakesh, Morocco, in 2015. Abedin told Podesta and Mook that Morocco was not CGI’s “first choice.”

The actual meeting was paid for by OCP, the Moroccan-government-owned mining company that has been accused of serious human rights violations. Clinton vigorously supported the Moroccan King when she was Secretary of State and the U.S.-financed Export-Import Bank gave OCP a $92 million loan guarantee during her tenure as Secretary of State.

The mining company also contributed between $5 million to $10 million to the Clinton Foundation, according to the charity’s web site.

Abedin described the arrangement in the email as having been organized by her boss. Hillary Clinton “created this mess and she knows it,” she told Podesta and Mook.

She said the Moroccan deal was entirely dreamed up by her boss. “This was HRC’s idea, our office approached the Moroccans and they 100 percent believe they are doing this at her request. The King has personally committed approx. $12 million both for the endowment and to support the meeting.” HRC stands for Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Abedin said Clinton’s attendance at the CGI event was a condition of the $12 million contribution. “Just to give you some context, the condition upon which the Moroccans agreed to host the meeting was her participation. If hrc was not part if it, meeting was a non-starter,” Abedin said.

Politico in 2015 reported that Clinton “was seen by Rabat as among its most ardent supporters in the Obama administration.” Rabat is the capital of Morocco.

The Robert F. Kennedy Center for Justice charged OCP with “serious human rights violations,” including exploitation of workers by not “adequately compensating the impoverished people who live there.”

Mohamed Yeslem Beisat, the Washington envoy for the Polisaro Front, as reported by AL-Monitor, a Middle East news site in 2015 that “OCP is the first beneficiary of the war and the first beneficiary of the occupation — it is the one that is cashing in on the misery of thousands of refugees and hundreds of political detainees for the past 40 years.”

Polisaro claims to lead a Moroccan government-in-exile based in Tindouf, Algeria.

“They’re doing this because they know Hillary has some chances of being president of the United States. And they want her to support their brutal occupation of Western Sahara,” Beisat charged….

- See more at:

Posts : 66613
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 75
Location : Wales UK

Back to top Go down


Post  Admin on Thu 27 Oct 2016, 5:07 pm
Israel Publishes 7th Century BCE Hebrew Text About Jerusalem After UNESCO Resolution Denying Jewish Ties to Jerusalem
ByPAMELA GELLER on October 27, 2016
This UNESCO resolution is ridiculous on its face. The Jewish connection to Jerusalem is as obvious as any people’s connection to any land, and goes back farther than most. This is a case of Muslims at the UN strong-arming others into doing their bidding. In fact, the Palestinian Authority and Jordan warned the 21 member states of UNESCO’s World Heritage Committee not to oppose or abstain from the Jerusalem resolution on Wednesday in Paris — or else.


“Is Jerusalem A Jewish Holy Site? Ancient Hebrew Text Discovery Cited By Israel After UNESCO Muslim Resolution,” by Clark Mindock, International Business Times, 10/26/16 (thanks to Lookmann):

On the same day that UNESCO, the United Nation’s world heritage organization, voted to adopt a controversial resolution that Israel claims deletes Jewish ties to Jerusalem holy sites, Israeli archaeologists made a fragment of an ancient text available Wednesday that shows the earliest known Hebrew reference to the city important to Christians, Jews and Muslims.

The text fragment, on an 11 centimeter by 2.5 centimeter piece of papyrus, dates back to the 7th century B.C.E, long before the Bible was written, according to the Israel Antiquities Authority. The paper was presented in Jerusalem shortly after the UN resolution passed, Reuters reported. The Hebrew script reportedly details the payment of taxes or transfer of goods to storehouses in Jerusalem.

“From the king’s maidservant, from Na’arat, jars of wine, to Jerusalem,” the papyrus reads.

The script was discovered after robbers plundered a cave and the Antiquities Authority says that the document is “the earliest extra-biblical source to mention Jerusalem in Hebrew writing.”

RTX2QIOD Fragments of a papyrus bearing the word “Jerusalem”, which the Israel Antiquities Authority said on Wednesday is written in ancient Hebrew and is the earliest reference to Jerusalem in an extra-biblical document dating back to the time of the First Temple period or 7th century BCE, is seen on display after an Israel Antiquities Authority news conference in Jerusalem Oct. 26, 2016. Photo: Reuters

The script is seen by Jewish officials as contradictory to the UNESCO resolution, which refers to areas around an important Jerusalem compound with significance to both the Jewish and Muslim religions as only a “Muslim holy site of worship.” Jewish people know the central site as Temple Mount and Muslims know it as Haram al-Sharif.

“Hey UNESCO, an ancient papyrus dating to the 1st Temple 2700 yrs ago has been found. It bears the oldest known mention of Jerusalem in Hebrew,” Ofir Gendelman, a spokesman for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, wrote on Twitter after the papyrus was publicly released.

The issue of what to call the holy site has had implications across the globe and politicians internationally have weighed in. Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton has said that it is “disappointing and wrong” that UNESCO was “considering a resolution on Jerusalem that fails to recognize and respect the deep and historic ties of the Jewish people to Jerusalem and its holy sites.” Her main rival, Republican Donald Trump, has also criticized the effort.

Posts : 66613
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 75
Location : Wales UK

Back to top Go down


Post  Admin on Wed 26 Oct 2016, 8:17 pm
Wikileaks: Bill Clinton BOASTS of Hillary’s ‘Working Relationship’ with Terrorist Organization
ByPAMELA GELLER on October 26, 2016
The bombshells about this criminal are now breaking daily. It’s not a question of Trump, it is an imperative that Hillary be defeated. If the people choose Hillary, then they must and will be punished.

“Wikileaks: Bill Clinton Boasts of Hillary’s ‘Working Relationship’ with Muslim Brotherhood,” By John Hayward, Breitbart, October 26, 2016:
In a speech Bill Clinton gave at the home of Mehul and Hema Sanghani in October 2015, revealed to the public for the first time by WikiLeaks, former President Bill Clinton touted Hillary Clinton’s “working relationship” with the Muslim Brotherhood’s Mohamed Morsi in Egypt as an example of her diplomatic skills.President Clinton also gave his wife a lot of credit for negotiating the Iran nuclear deal, in a passage that began with the standard Democrat “stuff happens” shrugging defense for foreign policy failures:
Finally, we live in a world, as I said, that’s full of good news and bad news. The United States cannot control it all, but we need a president who’s most likely to make as many good things happen as possible, and most likely to prevent big, bad things from happening. You can’t keep every bad thing from happening; who’s most likely to be able to get people involved in a positive way. Even the people who don’t like the Iran nuclear agreement concede it never would have happened if it hadn’t been for the sanctions. Hillary negotiated those sanctions and got China and Russia to sign off – something I thought she’d never be able to do. I confess. I’m never surprised by anything she does, but that surprised me. I didn’t think she could do it. The Chinese and the Russians to see past their short-term self-interest to their long-term interest and not sparking another nuclear arms race.
And when the Muslim Brotherhood took over in Egypt, in spite of the fact that we were (inaudible), she developed a working relationship with the then-president and went there and brokered a ceasefire to stop a full-scale shooting war between Israel and Hamas in Gaza, which on top of what was going on in Syria and the (inaudible) Jordan would have been a calamity for the world.
And when we were trying to reset our relations with Russia under President Medvedev, she and her team negotiated a New START Treaty, which limits warheads and missiles. And she lobbied it through the Senate. She had to get 67 votes, which means a lot of these Republicans who say that they don’t like her now are just kidding for election season. They trusted her, and she got it passed. You can’t get 67 votes in the Senate without a lot of Republican support. And I don’t know about you, but with all this tension and Mr. Putin trying to affect the outcome of the conflict in Syria, I think it’s a very good thing that we’re in a lower risk of any kind of accidental nuclear conflict with the Russians. She did that.
You’ll rarely find a more tortured political framing of the Iran debacle than Bill Clinton boasting that the sanctions Barack Obama lifted were super-awesome, as even those who don’t think those sanctions should have been lifted agree.
Mr. Clinton’s version of the Iran sanctions leaves out a few details, such as Russia’s keen financial interest in keeping Iranian energy out of the European market, and China’s desire to use Iran sanctions as a geopolitical bargaining chip.
But the part about the Muslim Brotherhood is most interesting. If anything, he is selling Hillary Clinton’s “working relationship” with Egyptian Islamists short, because she used American diplomatic leverage for Morsi’s benefit even before he got elected, warning Egyptians about “backtracking” to a military regime at a key moment of the post-Mubarak campaign, when Morsi was running against a former member of Hosni Mubarak’s military. There have long been rumors that more subtle forms of U.S. “pressure” were used to secure Morsi’s office, as well.
Then again, in public pronouncements, Clinton called Hosni Mubarak’s tottering regime “stable” and cautioned her Obama Administration colleagues against “pushing a longtime partner out the door.”
A few days ago, declassified State Department documents revealed Clinton’s talking points for a 2012 meeting with Morsi hailed his election as a “milestone in Egypt’s transition to democracy,” and stated that she was to offer the Muslim Brotherhood leader “technical expertise and assistance from both the U.S. government and private sector to support his economic and social programs.”
Clinton was also supposed to privately offer Morsi assistance with his police and security forces, which would be conducted “quite discreetly.”
After Morsi was gone, she declared herself exasperated with Egyptian political culture and declared herself a cynical “realist.” That is pretty much the opposite of what everyone in the Obama Administration was saying while the “Arab Spring” was in the midst of springing its little surprises on autocratic but America-aligned (or at least America-fearing) regimes, which we were all supposed to feel guilty about selfishly supporting for so long.
As for Clinton’s superb working relationship with Morsi, that eventually ended with Morsi’s wife railing against Clinton for supposedly dismissing him as “a simpleton who was unfit for the presidency,” and threatening to publish letters from Clinton to Morsi that would damage the former U.S. Secretary of State. Meanwhile, Mohammed Morsi is developing a solid working relationship with the Egyptian penitentiary system.
Egypt has one of those icky military governments again, and while it won’t have fond memories of Hillary Clinton’s support for the Muslim Brotherhood regime, it will most likely work with whoever wins the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Therefore, a prospective President Hillary Clinton probably won’t suffer too much from Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s appalling lapses in judgment.

Posts : 66613
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 75
Location : Wales UK

Back to top Go down


Post  Admin on Mon 24 Oct 2016, 4:39 pm
VIDEO: Rampaging Muslim migrant hordes RIOT on Greek island
ByPAMELA GELLER on October 24, 2016
The lovely, once idyllic island of Lesbos is paradigmatic of all Europe.

Perhaps they want to demonstrate what peace loving Muslims they are.

Of course Western elites and media monsters will blames us.

LESBOS IN FLAMES: Rampaging migrant mob STORMS asylum support offices on Greek island,” By  Simon Osborne, The Express, Oct 24, 2016

RIOTS have broken out on the Greek island of Lesbos where migrants have stormed European Asylum Support Office (EASO) buildings.

Police said a mob of around 70 people, most from Pakistan and Bangladesh, threw rocks and burning blankets at EASO containers inside the Moria migrant camp.

EASO Spokesman Jean-Pierre Schembri said protesters had hurled petrol bombs while interviews with asylum-seekers were taking place.

Staff have now evacuated the camp and the processing of asylum claims has been suspended
Video thanks to Amnesty International
Mr Schembri said: “They burnt our offices this morning. The process will not resume for the time being.”We have to evaluate security issues and in our view we need more presence of Greece police to be in place.”


Migrants detained in the Moria migrant camp on the Greek island of Lesbos

More than 15,000 asylum-seekers are living in overcrowded camps on Greek islands close to Turkey, stranded by a European deal with Ankara to seal the main route into the continent for a million refugees and migrants last year.Asylum-seekers wait for weeks or months for their claims to be processed.There are nearly 6,000 asylum-seekers on Lesbos alone, nearly double the capacity its two camps can handle. Violence and protests at the conditions there are frequent.
More than 15,000 asylum-seekers are living in overcrowded camps on Greek islands close to Turkey, stranded by a European deal with Ankara to seal the main route into the continent for a million refugees and migrants last year.

Asylum-seekers wait for weeks or months for their claims to be processed.

There are nearly 6,000 asylum-seekers on Lesbos alone, nearly double the capacity its two camps can handle. Violence and protests at the conditions there are frequent.
Asylum support staff were forced to flee their offices at the Moria camp on Lesbos

Posts : 66613
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 75
Location : Wales UK

Back to top Go down


Post  Admin on Sun 16 Oct 2016, 2:28 pm
LIBYA roiled as Clinton’s jihadis attempt COUP of UN-backed government
ByPAMELA GELLER on October 15, 2016
More of Hillary’s handiwork. In the run-up to the Libyan coup, Hillary Clinton was convinced that overthrowing Gaddafi would lead to a democracy, according to multiple sources interviewed by The New York Times.

Former Secretary of Defense Robert Gates said Clinton was a major influence in President Barack Obama’s decision to go to war. Gates recounted Obama once telling him a debate in the Oval Office on the issue was split “51-49.”more here

It led to the brutal murder of Qaddafi in the streets of Libya, complete chaos and  the rise of ISIS in Libya.

Today’s coup is led by by Khalifa al-Ghwell, former prime minister of the national salvation government, which was displaced by the GNA — Libya’s United Nations-backed government — seizing key state buildings and a TV station and pledging they are ready to fight to take power.when it arrived in the capital in March. In its statement, the plotters declared the GNA was now “void” and had been replaced by the salvation government.

Libya Dawn backs Ghwell’s Tripoli-based government, which says it is a revival of the post-revolutionary GNC. Aljazeera descibesLibya Dawn this way: ” Muslim Brotherhood supporters, armed groups such as Ansar al-Sharia and patchwork of conservative Misratan businessmen.”

Conservative in media-speak means jihadi – devout Muslims.


Now more disaster looms from Hillary’s jihadis:

“Coup attempt reported in Libya as militias try to seize power from UN-backed government,” By David Millward, Telegraph, 15 October 2016:

Militias have attempted to overturn Libya’s United Nations-backed government it has been reported.

According to the Guardian the militias have seized control of the central Rixos hotel, which houses the government’s state council.

The plotters issued a statement saying that the coup was an “historic initiative to rescue Libya”. However the presidency asserting that it remained in control has ordered the arrest of the plotters.

Led by Khalifa al-Ghwell, former prime minister , the two sides confronted each other at the Rixos with forces loyal to the Government of National Accord pulling back.

Supporters of the coup appeared to have gained control of the Rixos complex and the whereabouts of the presidency remained unclear.

The political situation has been unstable in Libya, despite the United Nations ordering an orderly handover of power to a unity government headed by Fayez al-Sarraj in March.

It had been hoped the deal, brokered by the United Nations last December, would enable the establishment of a government of national unity.

However last month forces from the elected parliament in Tobruk, which is hostile to the authorities in Tripoli, captured four key oil ports last month.

The regime Colonel Muammar Gaddafi who ruled the country with an iron first for decades was deposed with help of Nato air power in 2011.

Posts : 66613
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 75
Location : Wales UK

Back to top Go down


Post  Admin on Sun 16 Oct 2016, 2:23 pm
UK: Two teachers in ‘Trojan horse’ school who fed pupils a ‘diet of Islam’ allowed BACK into classrooms by High Court judge
ByPAMELA GELLER on October 16, 2016
UK school takeover
This makes it clear that the whole “Trojan Horse” investigation was a sham. The UK is fine with the Islamization of its schools. And that will be only the beginning.


“Two teachers in ‘Trojan horse’ school who fed pupils a ‘diet of Islam’, segregated assemblies and ignored sex education are allowed BACK into classrooms by a High Court judge,” by Jenny Awford, MailOnline, October 13, 2016:

Two teachers who were struck off for feeding pupils a ‘diet of Islam’ at a school linked to the ‘Trojan horse’ scandal are being allowed back into the classroom.

Inam Anwar and Akeel Ahmed, who taught at Park View in Birmingham and were part of WhatsApp group ‘Park View Brotherhood’, were banned in February.

But a High Court judge found the teachers were treated ‘unfairly’ and he overturned the ban today.

They claimed they were targeted after the ‘Trojan Horse’ letter was published in 2013 – which detailed a plot to introduce hardline Muslim teaching into schools.

Both men were struck off this year after a National College of Teaching and Leadership (NCTL) panel found they exercised ‘undue religious influence’ on pupils.

The panel heard the pupils at the 600-strong secondary school were never taught about safe sex, relationships or contraception.

Anwar, the head of modern languages, and Ahmed, in charge of religious studies, were accused of changing the curriculum so sex education was not taught.

NCTL officials also said Ahmed organised religious assemblies where boys were segregated from girls.

He was also said to have encouraged prayer during the school day through posters and a call to prayer on the school’s loudspeaker system.

Both men were also accused of taking part in a WhatsApp chat that discussed the murder of soldier Lee Rigby and the Boston Marathon bombings.

They were cleared of distributing or using leaflets, promoting the view that a married man has an ‘entitlement’ to have sex with his wife.

The NCTL said their misconduct was serious and Education Secretary, Nicky Morgan, agreed that they should be banned from teaching in England indefinitely.

But Mr Justice Phillips today ruled at London’s High Court that the men’s treatment had been ‘unjust’.

He accepted that important evidence had not been disclosed to the pair and there had been ‘serious procedural impropriety’ in the NCTL’s fact-finding process.

Upholding the pair’s judicial review challenge, he ruled their treatment had been ‘unfair’ and they were reinstated back into the profession….

Posts : 66613
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 75
Location : Wales UK

Back to top Go down


Post  Admin on Wed 12 Oct 2016, 10:47 pm
ISIS Weaponizes Drones: ‘This Is the Stuff Everyone Has Been Terrified About’
ByCHERYL CHUMLEY on October 12, 2016
ISIS has figured out how to weaponize the drones its members have been using for surveillance, and so has Hezbollah and other terror groups – and they’re starting to send them into battle against each other, particularly in Syria.

From the Associated Press:

“A video belonging to an AL Qaeda offshoot, Jund al-Aqsa, purportedly shows a drone landing on Syrian military barracks. In another video , small explosives purportedly dropped by the Iran-backed Shiite militant group Hezbollah target the Sunni militant group Jabhat Fatah al-Sham, formerly known as the Nusra Front.

“A U.S. military official, who spoke anonymously because he wasn’t authorized to discuss the matter publicly, said the U.S. military is aware of the development. Commanders have warned troops to take cover if they see what they might have once dismissed as a surveillance drone, he said.

“[Chris Woods] The head of the Airwars project, which tracks the international air war in Iraq, Syria and Libya, said the weaponized drones are clumsy but will scare people.”

And Woods didn’t pull punches about the possible ramifications of such technology in the hands of terrorists.

“There are a million ways you can weaponize drones — fire rockets, strap things in and crash them,” Chris Woods said, then adding, “This is the stuff everyone has been terrified about for years, and now it’s a reality.”

The videos haven’t been authenticated by independent U.S. military sources. But another U.S. military official, also anonymous, who spoke to the AP said by all appearances, the videos seemed genuine.

From AP:

“‘It’s not going to change the overall balance of power in the region, but it matters by the very fact that these are things that are normally beyond the capability of insurgents or terrorists groups,’ said Peter Singer, author of the book “Wired for War: The Robotics Revolution and Conflict in the 21st Century,” and a senior fellow at the New America Foundation. …

“There is no question the militant groups are outmatched in the sky. But as cells linked to the Islamic State group pop up across Europe and the United States, the real concern is the potential impact these experimental small, flying bombs could have if launched over crowded cities.

“‘You already see things happening in Ukraine, gangs in Mexico are using drones, and in Ireland, gangs there are using surveillance,’ said Wim Zwijnenburg, a security and disarmament policy adviser at Netherlands-based PAX for Peace. ‘Add a small amount of explosives to a small drone, and even the psychological factor is pretty significant.'”

COMMENT  With a near 80% illiteracy rate in the Muslim general population  I'm thinking they might have had some outside help with this one? For an organisation with no manufacturing capability they seem pretty well armed don't they?

Posts : 66613
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 75
Location : Wales UK

Back to top Go down


Post  Admin on Wed 12 Oct 2016, 10:42 pm
WikiLeaks: Hillary Clinton Says Vetting Refugees Is Impossible
ByPAMELA GELLER on October 11, 2016
So she knows, and still pledges to increase Muslim migrants by 550%.

WikiLeaks: Hillary Clinton Says Vetting Refugees Is Impossible, Breitbart, October 11, 2016:

Hillary Clinton regards vetting refugees as impossible, according to email released by WikiLeaks.

For his part, Donald Trump says his immigration plan does not ban Muslims, but instead requires “extreme vetting” for Muslims arriving from countries with documented problems of Islamic terrorism—consistent with the U.S. Constitution.

Regarding policy, Americans will decide between the sharply contrasting visions of Trump and Clinton—one focusing explicitly on security and America’s interests, the other saying behind closed doors that she believes in “open borders” but does not say so publicly, and that national leaders can have a private position that is different from their public positions.
Apologists for Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton say that Trump’s immigration plan is both bad policy and unconstitutional, and that one type of immigrant—Syrian refugees—should be admitted in far greater numbers.

But hacked emails released by Wikileaks show Clinton thinks vetting Syrian refugees is “impossible.” Michael Patrick Leahy reports that Clinton acknowledged this reality for refugees pouring into Jordan.

Director of National Intelligence James Clapper already admitted that the U.S. cannot vet these refugees, so this may be an instance of Clinton telling the public a different position than you take in private.

Emails also show Clinton’s inner circle caught in an echo chamber when it comes to constitutional rights for aliens (legal or illegal, not just refugees). Mandy Grunwald writes of wanting to “whack” a Republican “for trying to change the Constitution to deny babies born here the right to American citizenship if their parents aren’t citizens? (basically get rid of the 14th Amendment).”

To the contrary, the Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment does not guarantee citizenship to the children of foreigners, whether they are in the United States legally or not. Congress chooses to grant citizenship very broadly in the Immigration and Nationality Act, but the Constitution does not require it except for the children of American citizens born on American soil.

This is not exclusively a conservative idea; in addition to constitutional conservative stalwarts like Prof. John Eastman, noted judicial activist Judge Richard Posner on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit has declared that the Fourteenth Amendment does not confer birthright citizenship, calling the idea “nonsense.”

Moreover, in 1993 now-Democratic Senate Leader Harry Reid introduced a bill (the Immigration Stabilization Act) that would change current law, denying citizenship to the children of illegal immigrants. Since the Fourteenth Amendment was ratified in 1868, the constitutional contours of this issue have not changed from 1993 through 2016—only the politics of a cynical attempt to create millions of Democratic voters for those who racially stereotype foreigners from certain countries.

All this goes back to the famous line of Justice Robert Jackson that the Constitution is not a “suicide pact.” It is a document that ensures several fundamental principles of fairness and justice—like due process and equal protection—to all persons, whether citizens or not. But for the most part, it is a document predicated upon American exceptionalism, and showcasing an “America First” paradigm. The Constitution frames issues like national security and immigration in terms of what is best for America.

The Supreme Court seemed split on what the Constitution requires when it comes to immigrants, including refugees. Liberal justices refer to constitutional limits on immigration laws, while conservative justices say that the Constitution gives Congress complete discretion and full authority to determine who can cross the U.S. border and who can stay in this country.

On issues of immigration, refugees, and the Constitution, Trump and Clinton are worlds apart—presenting voters with a clear choice.

Posts : 66613
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 75
Location : Wales UK

Back to top Go down


Post  Admin on Sat 08 Oct 2016, 7:27 pm
German police hunt Muslim migrant after raid exposes airport bomb plot, 3 arrested
ByPAMELA GELLER on October 8, 2016
Angela Merkel has brought this down on her people. And Hillary vows to increase the Muslim migration into the USA by 500%.

“German police hunt Syrian bomb plot suspect after Chemnitz raid,” SKY News, October 8, 2016:
Three people are arrested as local media reports they are investigating a plan to bomb an airport.

German police are hunting for a suspected Syrian bomb plotter after raiding a building in the eastern city of Chemnitz.

The suspect was identified as Jaber Albakr from Damascus and police urged anyone with information about his whereabouts to come forward.

Police say two people have been arrested in the main station in Chemnitz and another arrested in Fritz Heckert area, but it is not clear how they are related to the inquiry.

Tom Bernhardt, spokesman for the state criminal police, urged caution.

A tweet from Saxony Police said: “The manhunt is under way looking for the suspect. Currently, we do not know where he is and what he’s wearing. Be careful.”

An image released by police showed a dark-haired man wearing a hooded sweatshirt. He was said to have been wearing similar clothes when he was last seen.


Police raided an apartment in the Fritz-Heckert-Gebiet neighbourhood after a tip-off from the domestic intelligence service.

A blast was heard as armed police forced their way inside.

“The explosion heard was an access measure by the police. A relevant person could not be found,” Saxony police said on Twitter.

They later said that “several hundred grams” of explosives was found in the raided apartment and added that they had been forced to evacuate the surrounding area as a precaution.

The luggage of the pair that were detained at the station was seized and is currently being examined by “special forces”, a police statement said.

Focus news magazine reported Albakr was planning an attack on a German airport.

Traces of explosives were found at the scene, according to police.

Focus cited security sources as saying the suspect he had come to Germany with Syrian refugees during the past year.

Hundreds of police are involved in the manhunt in Chemnitz
There is a heavy police presence outside the building, with hundreds of officers in the neighbourhood.

“Please remain in your apartments within the cordoned off area and follow the instructions of the police here and on site,” police said.

Islamic State claimed two attacks in Germany in July in which asylum seekers hurt 20 people – on a train near Wuerzburg and at a music festival in Ansbach.

Posts : 66613
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 75
Location : Wales UK

Back to top Go down


Post  Admin on Mon 26 Sep 2016, 12:40 pm

Muslim Teacher SUES School Over 9/11 Film
ByPAMELA GELLER on September 25, 2016
SEPTEMBER THE 11TH 81 Comments
Mind you, this is only 15 years after 9/11. Considering how fast Western elites are caving and submitting to Islamic demands, how many more years do you think it will take before all mention of Allah, jihad and Islam are scrubbed from 9/11 histories? Five? Ten at most.

The last martyrdom letters of the 9/11 jihadis invoked Allah over 90 times — how many people are aware of that salient fact?

Muslim teacher is suing a school for ‘race discrimination’ after she was sacked for objecting to a video of 9/11 being shown to 11-year-olds
Suriyah Bi was assisting the class at Heartlands Academy in Birmingham
The pupils were shown the horrifying video which was rated for over-18s
Ms Bi said the clip was inappropriate as it could distress the youngsters
She claims she was dismissed after expressing concerns to headteacher

By Alex Matthews For Mailonline, 25 September 2016:

Muslim teacher is suing a school for ‘race discrimination’ after she was sacked for objecting to a video of 9/11 being shown to 11-year-olds

Suriyah Bi was assisting the class at Heartlands Academy in Birmingham
The pupils were shown the horrifying video which was rated for over-18s
Ms Bi said the clip was inappropriate as it could distress the youngsters
She claims she was dismissed after expressing concerns to headteacher

By Alex Matthews For Mailonline

Teaching assistant Suriyah Bi claims she was sacked for objecting to children being shown a clip of the 9/11 attacks

Teaching assistant Suriyah Bi claims she was sacked for objecting to children being shown a clip of the 9/11 attacks

A Muslim teacher is taking legal action against a school over claims she was sacked for objecting to children being shown a video of the 9/11 terror attacks.

Suriyah Bi, 24, lost her job at Heartlands Academy in Birmingham, after just a week of being a teaching assistant in a year seven class there.

She claims that she was shown the door after she complained it was not appropriate for the 11 and 12-year-olds in her class to watch the ‘X-rated’ clip – that showed the horrors of the attacks on World Trade Center in New York, in September 2001.

Ms Bi, an Oxford University Graduate, from Yardley in Birmingham, is now pursuing claims against the school for unfair dismissal and religious discrimination.

The video was not mentioned in detail during the brief preliminary hearing which dealt with technical and legal matters.

But outside the hearing, Ms Bi said: ‘It was shown to some 30 children during class. I understand the video was shown without the permission of the authorities.

‘It raised questions about what safeguards there are in schools to protect children.

‘These were children aged 11, of whom many knew little, or nothing, about the 9/11 horror.

‘They were subjected to graphic scenes and some were shocked and upset. The video not only showed the plane crashing into the Twin Towers but also showed people committing suicide by jumping to their deaths from the tower blocks.

‘Such young children should not been shown things like that because it is well-known that it can play on their minds and even induce them to kill themselves.


Ms Bi, an Oxford University Graduate, from Yardley in Birmingham, is now pursuing claims against Heartlands Academy for unfair dismissal and religious discrimination
Ms Bi said footage of the 9/11 attacks was too upsetting to show the year 7 class she was helping at Heartlands (stock picture of the tragic incident)

 Ms Bi said footage of the 9/11 attacks was too upsetting to show the year 7 class she was helping at Heartlands (stock picture of the tragic incident)
‘I was in the classroom when the video was shown and I quickly objected. Later, I was told to leave the school.

‘There was an investigation into the matter but I was dismissed for making a whistle blowing complaint.’

Ms Bi said she believed no action was taken against the teacher who screened the video, but some people regarded the showing as ‘misguided’.

The class had been studying a poem called Out of the Blue, by Simon Armitage, about a victim of the 9/11 terrorist attack. The poem is part of the AQA GCSE syllabus.

E-Act, who run the Heartlands Academy, told the tribunal judge Ron Broughton that the teacher left because she no longer wanted to work for themE-Act, who run the Heartlands Academy, told the tribunal judge Ron Broughton that the teacher left because she no longer wanted to work for them
E-Act, who run the academy,  told the tribunal judge Ron Broughton that the teacher no longer wanted to work for them.

They complained there had been no need for the preliminary hearing and were considering making a claim for costs against Suriyah for causing delays.

Mr Broughton said she could go ahead with her legal claims at a full hearing later this year and he would not consider a claim for costs at this stage.

- See more at:

Posts : 66613
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 75
Location : Wales UK

Back to top Go down


Post  Sponsored content

Sponsored content

Back to top Go down

Page 6 of 16 Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7 ... 11 ... 16  Next

Back to top

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum