HILARY CLINTON PRESIDENTIAL RACE

https://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/11/hillary-receives-thousands-from-islamic-supremacists-after-she-was-revealed-as-leading-recipient-of-jihad-terror-tied-cash
Hillary receives thousands from Islamic supremacists AFTER she was revealed as leading recipient of jihad terror-tied cash
NOVEMBER 1, 2016 9:54 AM BY ROBERT SPENCER 29 COMMENTS

She knows she need not worry: her base is much more concerned about “right-wing extremists” than about Islamic jihad terrorists.
hillary-clinton
An update on this story. “Hillary Clinton Continues to Receive Islamist Campaign Contributions,” Algemeiner, October 31, 2016:

JNS.org – Hillary Clinton has received an additional $12,061 in campaign contributions from Islamist sources since the Middle East Forum (MEF) released its top-10 recipients of Islamist money list Oct. 20, the think tank reported.

Clinton was ranked first on the group’s 2015-2016 “Islamist Money in Politics” list of politicians who accepted funds from prominent Islamists with ties to terrorist organizations.

The new figures follow recently released Federal Election Commission filings from August and September.

The Democratic presidential nominee has accepted $53,226 from prominent Islamists, including $16,216 from associates of the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC), a group with “deep ties to the Muslim Brotherhood,” MEF reported. Salam al-Marayati, MPAC’s president, was “kicked off a congressional commission in 1999 when his defense of terrorist groups came to light,” according to MEF….

While the donations are relatively small, the information “holds politicians accountable for accepting funds from soiled sources, signals the Islamist lobby’s affections and intentions and tells voters who takes money from individuals linked to enemies of the United States and its allies,” the MEF reported.

http://www.nationalinsiderpolitics.com/2016/10/21/boom-wikileaks-drops-1-last-bomb-hillary-folks-can-quit-now/
Boom! Wikileaks Drops 1 Last Bomb On Hillary, It’s Over Folks, She Can Quit Now, This Is It!
By National Insider Politics -  October 21, 2016 7032
SHARE Facebook Twitter  
Hillary wants Obamacare to fail!

Yep! The biggest project of Barack Obama, her biggest supporter at this moment!

And why she wanted that? So that can be replaced with more socialist program called single-payer program where there will be no private business in US healthcare, everything will be centralized and made by government agencies, imagine that horror?!?!

Well, we have it on paper, thanks to WikiLeaks!

According to Angry Patriot Movement:

It would appear there is no honour among thieves. Wikileaks still has some aces up its sleeve, even though the site probably got its power cut by Democrat operatives. The latest email release shows yet another Clinton revelation.

RELATED GREAT NEWS: Trump LEADS In Polling In Virginia, Florida, Iowa, Ohio, North Carolina And Pennsylvania

Hillary Clinton actually wanted the Affordable Care Act, better known as “Obamacare,” to fail so that she could implement single-payer, government-controlled healthcare, perLifezette.com. Her cynical desire for this is outlined in an email sent to her regarding the “Cadillac Tax.”

The chain begins with Clinton and senior policy adviser Ann O’Leary, titled, “Memo on Cadillac Tax for HRC.” Surprise, surprise, Clinton said she is open to changing her position on the Cadillac Tax, noting her desire to see the ACA destroyed almost as an afterthought:

“Given the politics now w bipartisan support including Schumer, I’ll support repeal w ‘send of the Senate’ that revenues would have to be found,” Clinton wrote. “I’d be open to a wide range of options to do that, but we have to be careful that the R version passes, which begins the unravelling of the ACA.”

Of course, given the lip service Hillary Clinton paid to the theme of the ACA on the campaign trail, it would definitely raise some eyebrows how she feels about it in private. Apparently, Clinton only claimed to be in support of it just to get votes.

Moreover, Clinton wouldn’t be able to achieve her goals of single-payer without the complete collapse of Obamacare. Get ready for much, much higher taxes if Clinton is elected president!

Americans are facing skyrocketing costs for healthcare, and they continue to go up. A single-payer system is not the answer, but don’t tell that to Hillary Clinton. Her plan has always been the same.

Clinton is just quietly biding her time until the opportunity presents itself to push this ideology on the American people. She will do it when the stakes for the entire health system are at their highest.

The first time Clinton tried this was in 1993 when her husband put her in charge of healthcare reform. Her health plan was dubbed “Hillary Care” by its detractors, and it was met with stiff opposition.

Even if Hillary is elected, all is not lost, however. There is one thing that will stop her dead in her tracks, and that is your vote. Your support of GOP representatives and senators will have an important effect on Clinton.

It will stop her dead in her tracks yet again. Socialized medicine will not be able to take effect and ruin this country.

She is nuts! We could not have this woman in the White House!

America will stop existing if we do that!

If you agree, please share and comment below.

By sharing this story, you are helping Donald J. Trump to become our new US president.

==> NEXT PAGE see  TRUMP THREAD

Hillary Got $12 Million for Clinton Foundation As Quid Pro Quo For Meeting King of Morocco Who Also Gave $1 Million to Bill Clinton and Now Aids Paris Rapist
ByPAMELA GELLER on November 2, 2016
CLINTON CORRUPTION LATEST NEWS 2 Comments
    
hillary hijab77
The Clintons: a deeply corrupt crime family bent on profit for themselves, and America be damned. If she becomes President, it will be disaster upon disaster.

clinton-kingofmorocco
“King of Morocco offers to pay legal costs of Arabic pop star accused of raping a woman at a Paris hotel,” by Hannah Al-othman, Mailonline, November 1, 2016 (thanks to Phil):

The Moroccan king has vowed to cover the legal fees of a pop singer who has been imprisoned in France charged with aggravated rape.

Saad Lamjarred, 31, a star in Morocco who is well known on the Arab pop music scene, was charged on Friday after he allegedly attacked a woman in his hotel room.

Following the star’s arrest, King Mohammed VI has said he will cover Lamjarred’s legal costs, Morocco’s official MAP news agency reported.

According to the Moroccan Embassy in Paris, the king wants French lawyer Eric Dupond Moretti, who is known for securing his clients’ acquittals, to defend the pop star, and has promised to pick up the bill.

The 20-year-old woman claims that Lamjarred attacked her in his hotel room near the Champs Elysees in Paris.

Lamjarred, who had been due to perform in Paris on Saturday, has been imprisoned in France while the investigation continues.

He was reportedly under the influence of both alcohol and drugs at the time of the alleged attack….

“WIKILEAKS: Hillary Got $12 Million for Clinton Charity As Quid Pro Quo For Morocco Meeting,” by Richard Pollock, Daily Caller, October 20, 2016 (thanks to Phil):

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton arranged a $12 million donation from Moroccan King Mohammed VI to her family’s charity in 2014 in return for the Clinton Global Initiative hosting its international meeting in the North African Muslim nation, according to an email made public Thursday by Wikileaks.

The Moroccan monarch’s funds went to the Clinton Foundation’s endowment and to CGI. The Jan. 18, 2015, email was included in Wikileaks’ latest batch of communications to and from Clinton’s presidential campaign chairman, John Podesta.

The email from Huma Abedin, Clinton’s Deputy Chief of Staff at the State Department, was addressed to Podesta and campaign manager Robby Mook. Hillary Clinton was a director of the foundation at the time.

Singapore and Hong Kong officials reportedly were also vying to convene the CGI meeting in their countries, but the North African nation ultimately hosted it in a five-star hotel in Marrakesh, Morocco, in 2015. Abedin told Podesta and Mook that Morocco was not CGI’s “first choice.”

The actual meeting was paid for by OCP, the Moroccan-government-owned mining company that has been accused of serious human rights violations. Clinton vigorously supported the Moroccan King when she was Secretary of State and the U.S.-financed Export-Import Bank gave OCP a $92 million loan guarantee during her tenure as Secretary of State.

The mining company also contributed between $5 million to $10 million to the Clinton Foundation, according to the charity’s web site.

Abedin described the arrangement in the email as having been organized by her boss. Hillary Clinton “created this mess and she knows it,” she told Podesta and Mook.

She said the Moroccan deal was entirely dreamed up by her boss. “This was HRC’s idea, our office approached the Moroccans and they 100 percent believe they are doing this at her request. The King has personally committed approx. $12 million both for the endowment and to support the meeting.” HRC stands for Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Abedin said Clinton’s attendance at the CGI event was a condition of the $12 million contribution. “Just to give you some context, the condition upon which the Moroccans agreed to host the meeting was her participation. If hrc was not part if it, meeting was a non-starter,” Abedin said.

Politico in 2015 reported that Clinton “was seen by Rabat as among its most ardent supporters in the Obama administration.” Rabat is the capital of Morocco.

The Robert F. Kennedy Center for Justice charged OCP with “serious human rights violations,” including exploitation of workers by not “adequately compensating the impoverished people who live there.”

Mohamed Yeslem Beisat, the Washington envoy for the Polisaro Front, as reported by AL-Monitor, a Middle East news site in 2015 that “OCP is the first beneficiary of the war and the first beneficiary of the occupation — it is the one that is cashing in on the misery of thousands of refugees and hundreds of political detainees for the past 40 years.”

Polisaro claims to lead a Moroccan government-in-exile based in Tindouf, Algeria.

“They’re doing this because they know Hillary has some chances of being president of the United States. And they want her to support their brutal occupation of Western Sahara,” Beisat charged….

- See more at: http://pamelageller.com/2016/11/hillary-got-12-million-for-clinton-foundation-as-quid-pro-quo-for-meeting-king-of-morocco-who-also-gave-1-million-to-bill-clinton-and-now-aids-paris-rapist.html/#sthash.WKi9GLAg.dpuf
https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/168663/signatures/new

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3890588/CNN-cuts-ties-Democratic-Party-chief-Donna-Brazile-hacked-email-shows-leaked-SECOND-debate-question-Hillary-s-campaign.html?ito=social-facebook
CNN cuts all ties with Democratic Party chief Donna Brazile after hacked email shows she leaked a SECOND debate question to Hillary's campaign
Interim Democratic Party Chairwoman Donna Brazile no longer has a job as a paid commentator on CNN
WikiLeaks has published an email showing she leaked a CNN Democratic primary debate question to senior Hillary Clinton aides a day in advance
The question, about lead poisoning in the Flint, Michigan water supply, was asked in the debate where Clinton squared off against Bernie Sanders 
Brazile also wrote one of the Clinton staffers with a death-penalty question from a CNN-hosted town hall one day ahead of time
'From time to time I get the questions in advance,' she wrote, later claiming Russian hackers had set her up
CNN now says: 'We are completely uncomfortable with what we have learned about her interactions with the Clinton campaign'

CNN has cut all ties with Interim Democratic Party Chairwoman Donna Brazile, following revelations that she shared at least two questions with Hillary Clinton's campaign in advance of CNN-hosted Democratic debates and town hall broadcasts.
'We are completely uncomfortable with what we have learned about her interactions with the Clinton campaign while she was a CNN contributor,' the network's PR department said in a statement.
Brazile's actions were uncovered in emails released by WikiLeaks after a hacker penetrated the Gmail account of Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta.
On Monday the anti-secrecy group published a March 5 email showing Brazile tipping off Podesta and Clinton communications director Jennifer Palmieri about a question that an audience member would ask a day later during a debate against rival Bernie Sanders.
SHE'S OUT: CNN has cut all ties with Donna Brazile, the Democratic Party's interim chairwoman, after WikiLeaks emails established that she cheated by giving Hillary Clinton's campaign at least two debate and town hall questions ahead of the CNN-hosted events 
SMOKING GUN: Brazile gave Clinton's senior advisers a heads-up on March 5 about a question she would be asked the next night during a debate against Bernie Sanders
SEEYA She tweeted a farewell to CNN on Monday and then disappeared behind a press statement she made nearly three weeks ago
UNFAIR? Clinton (left) knew ahead of time about at least one question she and Bernie Sanders (right) would face in a CNN-hosted Democratic primary debate on March 6
The event, hosted in water-poisoned Flint, Michigan, was moderated by CNN anchors Don Lemon and Anderson Cooper.
'One of the questions directed to HRC tomorrow is from a woman with a rash,' Brazile wrote.
'Her family has lead poison and she will ask what, if anything, will Hillary do as president to help the ppl [people] of Flint.'
A woman named Lee-Anne Walters ended up asking the question.
'After my family, the city of Flint and the children in D.C. were poisoned by lead, will you make a personal promise to me right now that, as president, in your first 100 days in office, you will make it a requirement that all public water systems must remove all lead service lines throughout the entire United States, and notification made to the citizens that have said service lines?' Walters asked.
Brazile told Megyn Kelly on Fox two weeks ago that the hacked emails  had been altered, saying she was being 'persecuted'
+6
Brazile told Megyn Kelly on Fox two weeks ago that the hacked emails had been altered, saying she was being 'persecuted'

Republicans' hackles shot up last month when a Wikileaks email dated March 12 showed Brazile sending Palmieri a question about death penalty politics, which an exonerated death row inmate asked her the next night – almost verbatim – during a CNN-hosted town hall.
'From time to time I get the questions in advance,' Brazile wrote, according to the WikiLeaks-released email.
CNN employed Brazile as a paid commentator. She frequently advocated for Democratic candidates on the network until she took over the helm of the Democratic National Committee following the resignation of chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz – who was forced out amid charges of anti-Sanders partisanship.
When the death penalty email became public on October 14, she voluntarily 'suspended' her CNN contract, according to two network sources.
At the same time, she vehemently denied sending the March 12 email, telling Fox News anchor Megyn Kelly that she was being 'persecuted' over an email Russian hackers had likely inserted to embarrass her.
'I am not going to try to validate falsified information,' she declared.
STRIKE ONE: Brazile was on defense earlier this month when this WikiLeak-ed email showed her giving the Clinton campaign a CNN town hall question about the death penalty ahead of time
 PLAYER: Brazile has been a long-time Demorcatic Party insider but her future is now in doubt
CNN's statement on Monday claimed the network 'accepted Donna Brazile's resignation as a CNN contributor' on October 14.
The network denied ever giving her 'access to any questions, prep material, attendee list, backgroud information or meetings in advance of a town hall or debate.
Just before noon on Monday, Brazile tweeted: 'Thank you @CNN. Honored to be a Democratic Strategist and commentator on the network. Godspeed to all my former colleagues.'
On Sunday afternoon, seeming to anticipate more headaches, she tweeted: 'Please, God, let this end soon.'
Brazile referred media questions to a statement she issued on October 11, in which she claimed that 'as a longtime political activist with deep ties to our party, I supported all of our candidates for president. I often shared my thoughts with each and every campaign, and any suggestions that indicate otherwise are simply untrue.'
'As it pertains to the CNN Debates, I never had access to questions and would never have shared them with the candidates if I did,' she said then.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3890588/CNN-cuts-ties-Democratic-Party-chief-Donna-Brazile-hacked-email-shows-leaked-SECOND-debate-question-Hillary-s-campaign.html#ixzz4OhpXo6a1 
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

FOUND ON FACEBOOK.
Did you know??
Some Clinton connection I just discovered. 

So Chelsea is married to George SOROS nephew. 

Also, about 6 months before the Iran deal went through, John Kerry's daughter married an Iranian

Muslim; meaning his daughter is now in Islam and their grandchildren will be Islamic. 

Hillary's three top aides are Muslims and two are connected to the Muslim brotherhood. 

Are we getting the picture yet and what will happen unless Trump is elected?

The Clinton - Mezvinksy - Soros Connection
Edward Mezvinsky was born January 17, 1937.
Then you'll probably say, "Who is Ed Mezvinsky?" Well, he is a former Democrat congressman who represented Iowa's 1st congressional district in the United States House of Representatives for two terms, from 1973 to 1977. He sat on the House Judiciary Committee that decided the fate of Richard Nixon.
He was outspoken saying that Nixon was a crook and a disgrace to politics and the nation and should be impeached.
He and the Clintons were friends and very politically intertwined for many years.
Ed Mezvinsky had an affair with NBC News reporter Marjorie Sue Margolies and later married her after his wife divorced him.
In 1993, Marjorie Margolies-Mezvinsky, then a freshman Democrat in Congress, cast the deciding vote that got President Bill Clinton's controversial tax package through the House of Representatives.
In March 2001, Mezvinsky was indicted and later pleaded guilty to 31 of 69 counts of bank fraud, mail fraud, and wire fraud. Ed Mezvinsky embezzled more than $10 million dollars from people via both a Ponzi scheme and the notorious Nigerian e-mail scams. He was found guilty and sentenced to 80 months in federal prison. After serving less than five years in federal prison, he was released in April 2008 and remains on federal probation.
To this day, he still owes $9.4 million in restitution to his victims.
About now you are saying, "So what!"
Well, this is Marc and Chelsea Mezvinsky.
That's right; Ed Mezvinsky is Chelsea Clinton's father-in law. Clintons staying at Soros Family home during Chelsea’s wedding Now Marc and Chelsea are in their early thirties and purchased a 10.5 million dollar NYC apartment (after being married in George Soros' mansion).
Has anyone heard mention of any of this in any of the media? {And now you have a brief insight into how the Committee's billionaire elite control the politics and direction of nations - Ed.}
If this guy was Jenna or Barbara Bush's, or better yet, Sarah Palin's daughter's father-in- law, the news would be an everyday headline and every detail would be reported over and over. And yet liberals say there are no double standards in political reporting. 
And people are already talking about Hillary as our next President!

http://endingthefed.com/just-read-the-law-hillary-is-disqualified-from-holding-any-federal-office.html
Just Read the Law: Hillary is Disqualified from Holding Any Federal Office
POLITICSSeptember 22, 2016 A+A-EMAILPRINT

We’re so used to complicated problems that we occasionally overlook the obvious.  Like fiddling around with some gadget, trying to get it to work when all you needed to do is plug it in.

Could the solution to the “problem” of Hillary running for president be just that simple?  Did she really break the law — and would the penalty for breaking that law disqualify her from being president?  The answers to those two questions are “yes,” and “yes.”

If someone were to ask you if there is a law that Hillary has broken that should end her campaign for president right now, you’d probably answer that the laws broken by Hillary are innumerable.  But could you mention a specific law?  Well, now you can, and it was hidden in plain sight. If we laypersons can figure it out, it sort of makes you wonder what the FBI was doing when investigating Hillary’s email server.

Apparently, the FBI forgot to visit the Cornell Law Library. Word for word from the Cornell Law Library Former United States Attorney General Michael Mukasey tells MSNBC that not only is Hillary Clinton’s private email server illegal, it “disqualifies” her from holding any federal office. Very specifically points to one federal law, Title 18. Section 2071.

So here’s the one law you need to know that should terminate her presidential campaign:

For those of us who do not have United States Code committed to memory, here’s what it says:”(a) Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both. (b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States. As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States.”

Yes, it explicitly states “shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States.”

So, yes, it really is that simple.  Hillary is “disqualified from holding any office under the United States.”  So the only question left really should be, who is going to replace her on the Democrat ticket?

Very specifically points to one federal law, Title 18. Section 2071. COMMENT For those of us who do not have United States Code committed to memory, here’s what it says:”(a) Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both. (b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States. As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States.”

Yes, it explicitly states “shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States.”

http://www.frontpagemag.com/point/264510/cair-poll-muslims-back-hillary-72-over-trump-4-daniel-greenfield#.WAEm-detDs0.gmail
CAIR POLL: MUSLIMS BACK HILLARY 72% OVER TRUMP 4%
October 14, 2016  Daniel Greenfield  35
Share to Facebook3.1KShare to TwitterShare to More149Share to Print

Muslim settlers in this country have a candidate. And her name is Hillary.

A new survey confirms what many have long suspected: An overwhelming majority of Muslim Americans favor Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton over Republican nominee Donald Trump.

The nationwide survey released Thursday (Oct. 13) by the Council on American-Islamic Relations found that 86 percent of all registered Muslim voters intend to vote on Nov. 8, and 72 percent say they will cast their vote for Clinton.

Only 4 percent of the survey’s 800 respondents said they would vote for Trump. Three percent plan to vote for Jill Stein, and 2 percent said they would vote for Gary Johnson.

The only confusing thing is why Jill Stein isn't doing any better. Granted she doesn't have her own Huma Abedin, but she's Hillary on steroids.

Sure, Hillary is anti-Israel. But Jill Stein supports BDS. Hillary may be pro-Islamist, but Jill Stein would have refused to kill Osama bin Laden. And yet poor Jill gets no Muslim love. Perhaps Muslim anti-Semitism is just stronger than Muslim anti-Americanism.

Hillary Clinton: CHRISTIANS IN AMERICA Must ABANDON FAITH IN CHRIST, Adhere To NEW LIBERAL LAWS
By World News Politics -  September 18, 2016 50680
Democratic presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton has recently stated that Christians have to deny their belief with the enforcement of laws, by claiming that the Christian faith in being anti-abortion, and pro-life, has to be altered and this process ought to be carried out through policies.

VIA Viral Liberty 

If Christians must change Christian teachings in regards to abortion, then what Hilary Clinton is essentially saying is that Christians must deny their Faith. Hillary Clinton, speaking at the Women in the World Summit on April 23, made the statement:

Far too many women are denied access to reproductive health care and safe childbirth, and laws don’t count for much if they’re not enforced. Rights have to exist in practice — not just on paper. Laws have to be backed up with resources and political will. And deep-seated cultural codes, religious beliefs and structural biases have to be changed.

Notice that she says that the change of Christian beliefs is the “unfinished business of the 21st century,” which means she wants to persecute Christians.

God willing, Donald Trump will vanquish this witch in the elections.

The most horrific persecution of Christians is happening right now. Christians are being killed and tortured in the most demonic and cruel ways you can imagine, and its happening in Mexico.

Myriads of people killed, thousands of other innocent souls pressured under the most tyrannic oppression, but all is not lost, because thousands of Christians are being supplied with weapons and are returning the blow.

See the clip below.
http://www.worldnewspolitics.com/2016/09/hillary-clinton-christians-america-must-abandon-faith-christ-adhere-new-liberal-laws/

http://endingthefed.com/this-three-minute-video-of-hillary-just-cost-her-the-election-spread-this-now.html
POLITICSOctober 1, 2016 
There are plenty of reasons why Hillary Clinton should be kept away from the White House. Thankfully, the following video sums up every mistake and crime that Hillary made and sums it up in three minutes.
Hillary Clinton has been in the public eye for decades, but the more we learn about her, the more we realize how little we actually know. As the former First Lady attempts another run for President, let's uncover exactly who she is before it's too late.

The video, entitled “Who is Hillary Clinton?” has quickly gone viral. In a matter of minutes, it runs through Clinton’s biggest scandals, ranging from her email controversy to her desperate attempts to wipe her server clean.

Watch the video below and tell us what you think. Is Clinton a serious criminal?
This Three Minute Video Of Hillary Just Cost Her The Election… Spread This Now!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=4&v=pOWebCMpSio

http://www.angrypatriotmovement.com/wikileaks-exposes-hillarys-russia-deal/
BREAKING – WikiLeaks Exposes Hillary’s TREASONOUS Deal With Russia, It’s TERRIFYING

Hillary Clinton and her liberal pundit pals reference Russia about every other sentence. They blame Vladimir Putin’s country for email hacking and a myriad of other misdeeds and then try to convince voters he and Donald Trump are embroiled in an epic bromance. Their tactic just backfired—big league!

The hacked emails from Hillary’s campaign manager, John Podesta, courtesy of WikiLeaks, revealed a thread of emails detailing an intricate, intimate series of actions between members of Hillary’s election staff, the Clinton Foundation, and representatives of Russia! One of their interactions appears to have involved a quickly processed deal on uranium deposits. Iowa Senator Charles Grassley raised concerns about the deal least June.

The uranium deal, which involved 25 percent of Russia’s deposits, was discussed in an email conversation between Clinton Foundation communications head, Maura Pally, and Clinton campaign chief, John Podesta, Breitbart reports.

“Putting on all of your radars that Grassley sent a letter to AG Lynch (dated June 30th though we just saw it) asking questions about contributions to the Clinton Foundation and the Uranium One deal. Letter is attached. Craig is connecting with comms team to be sure they are aware as well,” the email said.

“Clinton Foundation’s ties to a number of investors involved in a business transaction that resulted in the acquisition of Uranium One, owner of U.S. based uranium assets, by Atomredmetzoloto (ARMZ), a subsidiary of Rosatom, a Russian government owned company. The transaction raised a number of national security concerns because it effectively ceded 20% of U.S. uranium production capacity to the Russian government,” said an excerpt from Grassley’s letter.

The original message was also sent to Hillary’s former shadow, Huma Adedin. She has not been spotted on the campaign trail since her husband’s latest sexting scandal, which included him making lewd comments and sending photos of himself in his underwear that also showed their toddler son laying next to him.

Minutes after receiving the email, John Podesta forwarded it to jpalmieri@hillaryclinton.com, kschake@hillaryclinton.com, tcarrk@hillaryclinton.com, creynolds@hillaryclinton.com. The deep connection between the State Department and the Clinton Foundation has never been clearer – or more terrifying.

Jennifer Palmeiri was Barack Obama’s communications director before she joined the Hillary Clinton campaign. Kristian Schake is a deputy communications director, Tony Caark is a research director, and Christina Reynolds was a deputy campaign director.

“During critical stages of the acquisition approval, interested parties made large donations – some in the millions of dollars – to the Clinton Foundation while Ms. Hillary Clinton held the position of secretary of state,” Senator Grassley’s letter also said.

It continues, “When millions of dollars flow to decision makers who have substantial discretion to provide support for or against approval of controversial transactions, public confidence in the integrity of the process requires a commitment to transparency and responsiveness to oversight inquiries.”

Around this same time, John Podesta’s company reportedly accepted a $35 million investment from a Russian company.

The FBI had already warned against engaging in dealings with this particular company because it was allegedly attempting to steal American intellectual property and technology.


-------
http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2016/10/11/wikileaks-clinton-bragged-putin-taking-private-inner-sanctum/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social
Wikileaks: Hillary Clinton Bragged About Being Invited to Putin’s ‘Inner Sanctum’
Vladimir-Putin-Hillary-Clinton-APAP Photo/Mikhail Metzel
by FRANCES MARTEL11 Oct 2016659
SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER
Shortly after being relieved of her duties as Secretary of State, Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton reportedly gave a series of speeches in which she described Russian President Vladimir Putin as a “very interesting conversationalist” who she had gotten to know, including a visit to his “private inner sanctum” to discuss wildlife conservation.
Clinton, who approved a deal granting Russia control of 20 percent of America’s uranium assets, has criticized rival Donald Trump for allegedly wanting to “support Putin.”

In paid remarks to private groups, Clinton boasted of having a personal relationship with Putin, according to excerpts released by the organization Wikileaks this weekend. Democratic operatives, including vice presidential nominee Tim Kaine, have neither confirmed nor denied the authenticity of the Wikileaks document.

In a speech to the Jewish United Fund Of Metropolitan Chicago in October 2013, the Wikileaks document cites Clinton as telling a story of bonding with Putin over the conservation of tiger populations.

“I said, ‘You know, Mr. Prime Minister, we actually have some things in common. We both want to protect wildlife, and I know how committed you are to protecting the tiger,’” Clinton reportedly told the audience. “I mean, all of a sudden, he sat up straight and his eyes got big and he goes, ‘You care about the tiger? I said, ‘I care about the tiger, I care about the elephant, I care about the rhinoceros, I care about the whale.'”

Then, she said, Putin invited her to what she described as his “private inner sanctum.”

Success After Failed Arkansas Bridge Implosion

Autoplay: On | Off
“So we go down the stairs, we go down this long hall, we go into this private inner sanctum. All of his, you know, very beefy security guys are there, they all jump up at attention, you know, they punch a code, he goes through a heavily-armed door,” she reportedly narrated. “And then we’re in an inner, inner sanctum with, you know, just this long, wooden table, and then further back, there’s a desk and the biggest map of Russia I ever saw. And he starts talking to me about, you know, the habitat of the tigers and the habitat of the seals and the whales.”

Earlier that year, Clinton reportedly dismissed the possibility of Putin’s military buildup being a threat to the United States. “I last saw [Putin] in Vladivostok where I represented President Obama in September for the Asia Pacific economic community,” she allegedly said in remarks at Sanford Bernstein. “I sat next to him. He’s an engaging and, you know, very interesting conversationalist.”

“We talked about a lot of issues that were not the hot-button issues between us, you know, his view on missile defense, which we think is misplaced because, you know, we don’t believe that there will be a threat from Russia,” she continued.

Clinton reportedly discussed the possibility of a “more positive” relationship with Putin.

“And finally on Afghanistan and Russia. Look, I would love it if we could continue to build a more positive relationship with Russia,” she reportedly said in a June 2013 speech to Goldman Sachs, claiming that Russia was “helpful” in Afghanistan. In that same speech, Clinton said that, while Putin was “asserting himself in a way now that is going to take some management on our side,” she still hoped the U.S. could “have a positive relationship with Russia.”

At the time, Putin had “asserted himself” in Georgia five years previous, usurping parts of the breakaway regions of Abkhazia and South Ossetia, and had reportedly begun planning for the subsequent invasion and colonization of Ukraine.

http://pamelageller.com/2016/10/clinton-mocks-catholics-and-evangelicals.html/
WikiLeaks Podesta Emails: Top Clinton Aides Mock Catholicism, Evangelical Christianity, call for “Catholic Spring”
ByPAMELA GELLER on October 12, 2016
“They must be attracted to the systemic thought and severely backward gender relations.”

What religion do you think these quislings are talking about?

It’s to laugh, it’s to cry. In the third round of releases of the Wikileaks John Podesta emails, Clinton’s senior apparatchiks are calling for  a “Catholic Spring.” No, this is not the Onion. They are deadly serious. Mind you, with the millions murdered in the cause of Allah, no such reformation of Islam is even hinted at.

John Podesta like George Soros seems eerily similar to Ayn Rand’s character of Ellsworth Toohey in The Fountainhead. Ellsworth Monkton Toohey embodies everything evil about mankind. He is irredeemably corrupt and evil. Toohey never tries to win friends or influence people, Toohey’s power lies entirely in his ability to control weaker minds and souls.

According to the latest Atlantic poll, Clinton holds a majority of Catholic voter support, by a 55-34 margin. And over half of America is going to vote for our executioners? Then we are indeed finished.

screen-shot-2016-10-12-at-12-37-07-pm

A newly leaked email shows Hillary Clinton’s current campaign chairman John Podesta and a Left-wing activist casually discussing fomenting “revolution” in the Catholic Church.

“There needs to be a Catholic Spring, in which Catholics themselves demand the end of a middle ages dictatorship and the beginning of a little democracy and respect for gender equality in the Catholic Church,” Sandy Newman, president and founder of the progressive nonprofit Voices for Progress, writes to Podesta in an email titled “opening for a Catholic Spring? just musing.”

A Catholic Spring – as millions of Christians are slaughtered by Muslim fighters.

In response, Podesta assures Newman to rest easy for he and his progressive pals have already created organizations explicitly designed to infiltrate the Catholic Church with progressive ideology, though he cautions that the time may not be right for full revolution — just yet.

“We created Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good to organize for a moment like this. But I think it lacks the leadership to do so now. Likewise Catholics United. Like most Spring movements, I think this one will have to be bottom up,” Podesta writes.

catholics-in-alliance-for-the-common-good

Soros funds Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good.

“WikiLeaks Dump: Top Clinton Aides Mock Catholicism, Evangelical Christianity,” Fox News, Ocotober 11, 2016;

New revelations from the latest WikiLeaks dump has key Hillary Clinton aides and allies taking heat after they are caught attacking two major faith groups–evangelicals and Catholics-– in email correspondence.

The 2011 email chains are between Communications Director Jennifer Palmieri, Campaign Chairman John Podesta and John Halpin from the Center for American Progress.

Halpin characterizes some members of the Catholic church as being engaged in an “amazing bastardization of the faith.”

Halpin continues, criticizing 21st Century Fox Chairman Rupert Murdoch, CEO of Fox News, and NewsCorp Chairman Robert Thomson for raising their children Catholic, Gallagher reported:

“They must be attracted to the systemic thought and severely backward gender relations,” he writes.

Podesta, a Catholic, does not directly respond in the correspondence.

“I imagine they think it the is the most socially acceptable, politically conservative religion–their rich friends wouldn’t understand if they became evangelicals” Palmieri says of the two men.

The Catholic League slammed those involved, saying it “makes one wonder what else Clinton’s chiefs… are saying about Catholics and Catholicism.”

Karl Rove called the remarks “thinly-veiled bigotry,” suggesting that “Donald Trump…take a whack at these comments [instead of Paul Ryan]” in the coming days.

Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council, said  that these are the same folks who believe in Clinton’s “basket of deplorables” characterization of Trump supporters.

“They believe that people who actually want to live by their faith are backwater people. [They see religion as a] glorified social club–if you want to…live your life according to [Scripture], you’re going to run into trouble with Hillary Clinton.”

According to the latest Atlantic poll, Clinton holds a majority of Catholic voter support, by a 55-34 margin.

https://sharylattkisson.com/the-clearest-no-spin-summary-of-fbi-report-on-hillary-clinton-email/
The Clearest (No Spin) Summary of FBI Report on Hillary Clinton Email
by sattkisson    on September 30, 2016 in Benghazi, News
3kgV0RJE
Since this article refers to both President and Mrs. Clinton, they are sometimes referred to by their first names for clarity.
Most of the information is from the FBI report. Some contextual facts and dates have been added.
The Takeaways. The Players. The Timeline.
The Takeaways
The FBI could not review all of the Hillary Clinton emails under investigation because:
The Clintons’ Apple personal server used for Hillary Clinton work email could not be located for the FBI to examine.
An Apple MacBook laptop and thumb drive that contained Hillary Clinton email archives were lost, and the FBI couldn’t examine them.
2 BlackBerry devices provided to FBI didn’t have their SIM or SD data cards.
13 Hillary Clinton personal mobile devices were lost, discarded or destroyed. Therefore, the FBI couldn’t examine them.
Various server backups were deleted over time, so the FBI couldn’t examine them.
After State Dept. notified Hillary Clinton her records would be sought by House Benghazi Committee, copies of her email on the laptops of her attorneys Cheryl Mills and Heather Samuelson were wiped with BleachBit, and the FBI couldn’t review them.
After her emails were subpoenaed, Hillary Clinton’s email archive was also permanently deleted from her then-server “PRN” with BleachBit, and the FBI couldn’t review it.
Also after the subpoena, backups of the PRN server were manually deleted.
Even though the FBI did not have a complete record of Hillary Clinton’s emails on three unclassified personal servers, it found:
2,093 emails State Dept. currently classifies as Confidential or Secret. (State Dept. did not address what their classification was at the time they were sent.)
193 emails (81 separate email conversations) that were classified at the time they were sent, ranging from “Confidential” to “Top Secret/Special Access Program.”
68 of the 81 email chains remain classified today.
8 were Top Secret.
37 were Secret.
36 were Confidential.
7 were Special Access Program.
3 were Sensitive Compartmentalized Information.
36 were Not Releasing to Foreign Governments.
2 were Releasable Only to Five Allied Partners.
12 of the suspect email chains were not provided by Hillary’s attorneys. The FBI found them other ways.
The email chains contained classified information from 5 other agencies: CIA, DOD, FBI, NGA and NSA.
The Players (as they surface in timeline)
Justin Cooper: President Bill Clinton aide
Bryan Pagliano: Computer technician from Hillary Clinton ‘08 campaign
Huma Abedin: Hillary Clinton aide
Eric Boswell: State Dept. Assistant Secretary for Diplomatic Security
John Bentel: State Dept. Information Technology official who handled Hillary Clinton’s issues
Jake Sullivan: Hillary Clinton aide
Cheryl Mills: Hillary Clinton chief of staff and attorney
Raymond Maxwell: Former State Dept. Deputy Assistant Secretary
Monica Hanley: Hillary Clinton aide
Sid Blumenthal: Hillary Clinton friend and adviser
Heather Samuelson: Hillary Clinton campaign worker and attorney
David Kendall of Williams & Connolly: Hillary Clinton attorney
3 Known Clinton Private Servers: Apple, “Pagliano,” and Platte River Networks (PRN)
The Timeline
2007: Hillary Clinton announces run for President. Bill Clinton aide Justin Cooper buys an Apple server for a new email system to be located in the Clintons’ Chappaqua, NY residence.
June 2008: Hillary drops out of Presidential race. Cooper sets up the Apple server.
Fall 2008: Hillary aide Huma Abedin contacts Hillary campaign computer tech Bryan Pagliano to build 2nd server because the Apple—in use for just a few months—is “antiquated.”
Hillary Clinton
Hillary Clinton as secretary of state
Jan. 2009: Hillary begins transitioning from her personal BlackBerry.net email to a clintonemail.com account on the “antiquated” Apple server.
Jan. 11, 2009: Increase in cyberattack attempts on State Dept. employee personal email accounts.
Jan. 21, 2009: Hillary becomes secretary of state. She declines a State Dept. email address and instead uses her personal BlackBerry in office.

Feb. 2009: Hillary travels to Asia, her first overseas trip as secretary of state.
March 2, 2009: Security memo warns Hillary and Chief of Staff Cheryl Mills that it\u2019s risky to use their personal email and BlackBerry devices.
I cannot stress too strongly\u2026that any unclassified BlackBerry is highly vulnerable in any setting to remotely and covertly monitoring conversations, retrieving e-mails, and exploiting calendars. \u2013State Dept. memo from Eric Boswell of Diplomatic Security 3/2/2009.
March 11, 2009: Hillary is told there\u2019s \u201Cintelligence concerning this vulnerability during her recent [Feb.] trip to Asia.\u201D She acknowledges to Boswell that she \u201Cgets it.\u201D
March 2009: State Dept. official handling Hillary computer security issues, John Bentel, reportedly receives memo showing that Hillary\u2019s private server was set to be installed at her NY home. Bentel would later tell FBI he didn\u2019t know Hillary was using a personal account or server.
March 18, 2009: The server installed by Pagliano replaces the Apple, but Pagliano later tells FBI he didn\u2019t transfer Hillary\u2019s clintonemail.com account. The FBI could never locate or examine Apple server to determine facts.
Feb. 9, 2011: State Dept. staff again raises concerns about Hillary and staff using electronic devices in their offices.
March 2, 2011: State Dept. detects malicious cyber activity aimed at senior officials.
April 2011: Hillary\u2019s immediate staff is briefed again on cybersecurity threats.
May 2011: Hillary\u2019s immediate staff is briefed again.
Aug. 30, 2011: Hillary requests a government device to replace her broken BlackBerry. After she\u2019s told it would be subject to Freedom of Information Act records searches, no government device is issued.
2011: Memo from Hillary cautions State Dept. employees about security and records retention, and advises not to use personal email for government business.
Sept. 11, 2012: Islamic extremist terrorists attack Americans in Benghazi, Libya.
Nov. 2012: State Dept. Accountability Review Board convenes to investigate Benghazi. Hillary aides Cheryl Mills and Jake Sullivan are reportedly seen at allegedly improper Benghazi \u201Cdocument sorting\u201D session in State Dept. basement.
Week of Dec. 9, 2012: Hillary faints and falls, suffering a concussion. State Dept. keeps it secret for several days.
Dec. 4, 2012:
Congressional investigators try to schedule interview with Bentel, Hillary\u2019s State Dept. information technology officer.
He declines.
He retires from State Dept. in December.
Dec. 15, 2012: Hillary postpones her Congressional testimony on Benghazi due to illness.
Dec. 30, 2012: State Dept. discloses discovery of \u201Cblood clot\u201D in Clinton\u2019s head from the concussion.
Early 2013: Pagliano plans to seek other work. Clinton staff begins searching for vendor to manage a new, 3rd Clinton email server.
Jan. 2, 2013: Platte River Networks of Denver (PRN) wins contract for new Clinton server.
Jan. 7, 2013: Hillary returns to work.
Jan. 23, 2013: Hillary testifies to Congress on Benghazi attacks.
Presidential nominee, Democrat Hillary Clinton
Presidential nominee, Democrat Hillary Clinton
Feb. 1, 2013: Hillary\u2019s last day as secretary of state. She fails to produce her federal records as required by law.
Spring 2013:
Hillary aide Monica Hanley and Cooper put Hillary email archive on an Apple MacBook laptop and thumb drive.
But Hanley later tells FBI she forgot to give laptop and thumb drive to Hillary\u2019s staff.
The laptop and thumb drive are lost and the FBI cannot examine.
March 14, 2013: Hillary confidant Sid Blumenthal\u2019s AOL email is hacked by Romanian cyber hacker \u201CGuccifer,\u201D uncovering a memo to Hillary with classified \u201Cconfidential\u201D information.
June 2013: According to a book later written by Bill, Hillary finally recovers from her Dec. 2012 illness about now.
June 23, 2013: Pagliano server is moved to Equinix datacenter, NJ which \u201Cserves the world\u2019s largest financial, media, and enterprise companies.\u201D
Read: The Definitive Hillary Email Timeline (prior to FBI report)
June 30, 2013: Pagliano server email accounts are transferred to the new PRN server.
July 18, 2013: Clintons sign formal deal with PRN for new email server.
Early 2014: Hanley says she finds Apple MacBook laptop from Spring of 2013 at her home and tries, but fails, to remotely transfer Hillary email archive to PRN server.
Feb. 2014:
Hanley ships Apple MacBook laptop to unidentified person who transfers Hillary email archive to Gmail address, then to PRN server.
Hanley instructs unidentified person to delete and/or wipe Hillary email archive from Apple MacBook and Gmail.
Unidentified person ships Apple MacBook via US Postal Service or UPS to unidentified female Hillary associate who later tells FBI she never received it.
Nobody can find the Apple MacBook or thumb drive containing Hillary archive email.
May 8, 2014: House Benghazi committee is established.
Summer of 2014: State Dept. notifies Hillary aide Cheryl Mills that it will be requesting Hillary\u2019s work emails.
July 23, 2014: Congressional Benghazi committee reaches agreement with State Dept. on production of records.
July 2014:
Mills initiates review of any Hillary work emails with .gov addresses that were transferred from Pagliano server to PRN server.
The emails don\u2019t include the Jan-March 2009 emails lost on the missing Apple server.
The .gov work emails are put in a file on laptops of Mills and Hillary attorney Heather Samuelson.
These laptop email files would later be wiped using BleachBit so they could never be recovered. The FBI was unable to review them.
August, 2014: State Dept. provides House Benghazi Committee with eight emails to or from Clinton that show her use of a private email account.
Sept. 15, 2014: Sharyl Attkisson reports on State Dept. official who said he witnessed Benghazi document sorting session with Hillary aides in State Dept. basement in 2013.
Late Sept. 2014:
Mills and Samuelson review the rest of the available Hillary emails, besides the .gov.
These email files would later be wiped using BleachBit so they could never be recovered. The FBI was unable to review them.
Selected emails are printed in Mills\u2019 office and reviewed again by attorneys Samuelson, Mills and Hillary attorney David Kendall of Williams & Connolly.
\u201CNon-work\u201D emails are shredded.
\u201CWork\u201D emails were printed and provided on USB drive to Kendall.
Dec. 2014: Hillary and Abedin begin using new email accounts on the domain hrcoffice.com.
Dec. 5, 2014: Hard copies of Hillary work emails are given to State Dept.
Dec. 2014: Hillary instructs her staff she no longer needs to keep the remaining \u201Cpersonal\u201D emails.
Dec. 2014 or Jan. 2015:
Mills and Samuelson request unidentified person to delete the Hillary email files from their laptops.
Software called \u201CBleachBit\u201D is used so it can never be recovered.
Unknown Hillary staffer also wants Hillary email archive removed from PRN server.
Mills asks for shortened email retention for clintonemail.com account because Hillary decides she no longer needs emails older than 60 days.
July 10, 2015: FBI begins investigation Hillary email situation after U.S. Intelligence Community Inspector General refers the case of possible improper handling of classified information.
March 2, 2015:
NYT article exposes fact that Clinton used personal email account exclusively for state business.
PRN technicians conduct work on Pagliano server at Equinix datacenter.
Mills later tells FBI they were working on the server because she asked them to conduct an equipment inventory.
March 3, 2015: House Benghazi committee requests Hillary attorneys at Williams & Connolly to preserve and produce all documents and media related to her two clintonemail.com known addresses.
March 4, 2015: House Benghazi committee privately subpoenas all Hillary emails related to Benghazi terrorist attacks. Clinton does not disclose the subpoenas but tweets, \u201CI want the public to see my email. I asked State to release them. They said they will review them for release as soon as possible.\u201D
March 9, 2015: Mills emails PRN and makes reference to the preservation request from Congress. A PRN technician would later tell FBI he doesn\u2019t remember seeing it.
March 10, 2015: Clinton answers questions about her email practices for the first time. She tells reporters:
It was more convenient to use the private server.
\u201CI wanted to use just one device for both personal and work emails instead of two.\u201D
Last year, she deleted nearly 31,000+ emails that were \u201Cprivate.\u201D
She will not turn over her personal email server.
She \u201Cfully complied\u201D with the law.
She has turned over to the State Dept. 55,000 pages of work-related emails.
There were 62,320 emails in her account: 30,490 were public business; 31,830 were private.
March 25, 2015:
PRN has conference call with Bill Clinton\u2019s staff.
PRN technician later tells FBI that, at this point, he realized he\u2019d forgotten to shorten Hillary\u2019s email retention (that Mills requested in Dec. 2014), so he now deletes the Clinton archive mailbox from PRN and uses BleachBit to permanently delete files holding the emails.
FBI says one PRN technician gave three conflicting stories but acknowledged that, when he made deletions, he knew of Congress\u2019 preservation request and knew he should not delete Hillary\u2019s email data on PRN server.
The FBI says somebody also manually deleted backups of the PRN server during this time frame. Clinton and Mills say they were unaware of these deletions.
March 31, 2015: There\u2019s a conference call among PRN, Kendall and Mills. Later, PRN would exert attorney-client privilege and refuse to comment on conversation. This means Hillary\u2019s attorneys are representing the PRN technician, too.
May 27, 2015: In a Freedom of Information (FOI) lawsuit, the court orders State Dept. to post emails on FOI website on a monthly schedule to complete by Jan 29, 2016. (State completes Feb 29, 2016.)
July 28, 2015: Hillary revises her statement regarding classified email to say she is confident she never sent or received emails that were classified at the time. Later, the FBI would find Hillary sent or received 193 emails (81 separate email conversations) that were classified at the time they were sent, ranging from \u201CConfidential\u201D to \u201CTop Secret/Special Access Program.\u201D
July 31 2015: The federal judge in a Judicial Watch FOI suit, Emmet Sullivan, orders State Dept. to request that Mills and Abedin confirm, under penalty of perjury, that they have produced all government records in their possession, return any other government records immediately, and describe their use of Hillary\u2019s email server to conduct government business.
Aug. 5, 2015: State Dept. sends letter to Hillary including Judge Sullivan\u2019s order.
Aug. 6, 2015: Mills\u2019 attorney tells Judicial Watch that it has instructed Mills to \u201Cdelete any and all electronic copies [of potential federal records] in her possession\u201D after her anticipated production of records on Aug. 10. Judicial Watch files an emergency request to block the destruction.
Aug. 11, 2015: Inspector General report to the Senate contradicts Hillary claims; some emails, says the IG, contained information that was classified at the time.
Aug. 19, 2015: Hillary\u2019s personal lawyer tells a Senate committee that all data, including emails, was erased from her server prior to it being turned over to the FBI. Hillary tells reporters the investigation surrounding her server \u201Chas nothing to do with me.\u201D She contradicts the Inspector General by reiterating that she never sent or received classified material.
Aug. 2015:
FBI obtains Pagliano server.
Williams & Connolly doesn\u2019t disclose that there\u2019s other related equipment, and that Hillary emails had been transferred to PRN server.
PRN says, at this time, it realizes it\u2019s accidentally backing up its Hillary server on the cloud rather than just locally as the Clintons had directed. It discontinues the cloud backups.
Aug. 27, 2015: Hillary tells an Iowa audience that using a personal email server \u201C\u2026clearly wasn\u2019t the best choice..I take responsibility\u2026\u201D She repeats her modified statement, \u201CI never sent nor received any e-mail that was marked classified.\u201D
Sept. 10, 2015: Pagliano pleads the fifth before House Benghazi committee.
October, 2015: Previously withheld Hillary emails reveal she told daughter Chelsea almost immediately that terrorists were behind the Benghazi attacks, yet told the public they were prompted by a protest over a YouTube video.
Oct. 3, 2015: After learning about additional Pagliano server equipment, and that Hillary emails had been transferred to PRN server, FBI obtains equipment and PRN server.
Oct. 14, 2015: Hillary attorneys at Williams & Connolly review an iMac of Hillary\u2019s and assure the Justice Dept. that no work emails were found on it.
Oct. 16, 2015: Williams & Connolly provides 2 Hillary Blackberry devices to FBI but forensics finds no evidence they were ever connected to her personal servers. They do not contain their SIM cards or SD secure digital cards.
Oct. 28, 2015: State Dept. sends formal request to Hillary and other former secretaries asking for their work-related emails. Hillary directs attorneys Kendall and Mills to oversee.
Jan. 7, 2016: FBI interviews Sid Blumenthal, who sent at least 24 memos currently classified \u201Cconfidential\u201D and at least one email classified as \u201CSecret\u201D at the time and currently to Hillary on unclassified system.
Feb. 9, 2016: Justice Dept. requests all of Hillary\u2019s 13 mobile devices.
Feb. 22, 2016: Williams & Connolly tells DOJ it cannot locate any of the devices, so FBI was unable to examine the 13 mobile devices.
Feb 27, 2016: Jake Sullivan is interviewed by FBI. He says he\u2019s not concerned emails with classified information that he sent to Hillary on unclassified system.
March 2016: Bentel declines to testify to Senate committee.
March 31, 2016: Guccifer is extradited from Romania to US.
April 5, 2016: FBI interviews Huma Abedin who sent at least one email classified as \u201Cconfidential\u201D to Hillary on her unclassified system.
April 9, 2016: Cheryl Mills is interviewed by FBI. She refuses to answer some questions under attorney-client privilege. She says she\u2019s not concerned by her decision to send Hillary emails with information later deemed \u201Cclassified\u201D on her unclassified system.
May 25, 2016:
State Dept. Inspector General (IG) says under Foreign Affairs Manual, employees are required to conduct day to day operations using authorized information system.
IG says there\u2019s \u201Cno evidence\u201D Clinton sought approval to use her personal email account or private servers despite her obligation to do so.
June 22, 2016: Pagliano pleads the fifth 125 times in deposition with conservative watchdog Judicial Watch.
June 27, 2016: Attorney General Loretta Lynch meets privately with President Clinton. The two say it was a purely social visit.
July 2, 2016: FBI interviews Hillary Clinton.
July 4, 2016: Hillary indicates that, as President, she would likely keep Lynch as attorney general.
July 5, 2016: FBI Director James Comey recommends no prosecution in Hillary email case.
Read the FBI documents

http://www.nowtheendbegins.com/hidden-wires-mechanism-kind-clearly-seen-hillary-clintons-jacket/
NTEB EXCLUSIVE: HIDDEN WIRES AND MECHANISM OF SOME KIND CLEARLY SEEN UNDER HILLARY’S JACKET
A hidden microphone system would go a long way to explaining Hillary's very robotic answers, as if she was listening to the answers she was giving split seconds before verbalizing them. So you look at the photo and decide for yourself what that is. A microphone, a defib machine...what? Whatever it is, she was trying to keep it from the public.

SHORT VIDEO
VIDEO FOOTAGE CAPTURES MOMENT HIDDEN WIRES ARE REVEALED UNDER HILLARY CLINTON’S PANTSUIT JACKET.
For quite a while now, Hillary watchers have been baffled by her wearing of thick, bulky pantsuits and jackets even when it is very hot outside. Some have speculated that they hid a catheter or colostomy bag as a result of her various medical conditions like Parkinson’s Disease. This speculation is fueled largely because of lot of her outfits are obviously bulky and not form-fitting as if she was intentionally trying to keep something concealed. Remember sneaking outside candy and sodas into the movie theatre when you were younger, under a bulky sweater even though it was summertime? This is the impression Hillary gives you when you see her odd outfits and weird styling choices.


But at last night’s presidential debate with Donald Trump, as she bent over to shake someone’s hand, a wiring system attached to some kind of pod could clearly been seen under her jacket.

A hidden microphone system would go a long way to explaining Hillary’s very robotic answers, as if she was listening to the answers she was giving split seconds before verbalizing them.

So you look at the photo and video and decide for yourself what that is. A microphone, a defib machine…what? Whatever it is, she was trying to keep it from the public. If it’s a medical device that’s one thing – but – I think the American voting public needs to know if it was a hidden microphone or not

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The dark and dangerous side of Hillary Clinton - URGENT message from Pat Matrisciana
VIDEO 7 Min
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dj17YfQZN24


Published on 11 Apr 2016
http://jeremiahfilms.com/shop/dark_an...

URGENT message from Pat Matrisciana - the dark and dangerous side of Hillary Clinton. Larry nichols, Star Parker, Joseph Farah, and Bill Garaway will all be featured in upcoming episodes. Patrick Matrisciana, founder of Jeremiah Films explains how the FBI is covering up for the Clintons and the true story about Vince Foster.
Hillary clinton, in 2012 was secretary when there were the benghazi attack (disaster), she was secretary of state at that time. The controversy, regarding the clinton, secretary of state emails, and email server, the benghazi house select committee, emailgate, and many other controversies.

https://truthkings.com/leaked-hillary-podium-photo-shows-medical-delivery-device-inside/#

hillarypodiumzoom
LEAKED Hillary Podium Photo Shows Medical Delivery Device Inside
  
September 26, 2016 by Gary BarnesPolitics
Tomorrow night, Democratic Presidential nominee Hillary Clinton will face off in a historic debate against GOP Presidential nominee, Donald Trump. In what is likely to be the most viewed presidential debate in television history, both candidates look to separate themselves from the other. The race has been extraordinarily tight, something the DNC has been somewhat bitter about, causing them an extreme level of motivation to assure that “everything goes right.”
Hillary Clinton’s health is a primary concern with the DNC. They fully understand that any public health issues could result in losing the election entirely. This will be the biggest stage in the world, Hillary needs to stand and, well, remain standing.
The question now is, has the DNC found a way to help make sure Hillary doesn’t fall down? Some suspect the photo below shows a medical delivery device that would pump medications directly to Hillary Clinton while she stands at the podium.
ADVERTISEMENT
A newly posted image might hold the answer. On the left is Donald Trump’s podium, the right allegedly being Hillary Clinton’s.
podium
Let’s take a closer look at Hillary’s podium.
hillarypodiumzoom
Why does her podium appear to have a device inserted that’s not present in her rival’s? It is likely a device which could deliver medications to her so that she can avoid long bathroom breaks, which served her poorly in prior debates. In one of her previous debates with Senator Bernie Sanders, Clinton famously vanished for over 20 minutes on what was called a “bathroom” break. Later in the debate schedule, she refused to do the last debate in what many say was due to medical issues associated with her staying unattended so long. The DNC realizes Trump won’t be shy in calling out any unordinary behavior on the part of Hillary, so they need to keep her standing for as long as humanly possible. Being able to remotely deliver meds at the first sign of trouble would do exactly that.
Some explain the image as a “box to stand on,” which is possible, but what are the wires / tubes for? One thing is for sure, photos such as this one going viral prove that Hillary has no level of trust amongst the public at large. Tomorrow night will be an interesting evening, that’s for sure.
Image Source Rita Cosby/WABC Radio

http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-clinton-donor-chagoury-20160828-snap-story.html
He was a billionaire who donated to the Clinton Foundation. Last year, he was denied entry into the U.S.
Gilbert Chagoury
Gilbert Chagoury, a major donor to the Clinton Foundation, was denied entry to the U.S. last year by the State Department. (Getty Images)
Joseph Tanfani
 
Nigerian billionaire Gilbert Chagoury, one of Africa’s richest men, has built a reputation as a giant of global philanthropy.

His name is on a gallery at the Louvre and a medical school in Lebanon, and he has received awards for his generosity to the Catholic Church and St. Jude’s Children’s Hospital. He owns a seven-bedroom hilltop mansion in Beverly Hills, and he has a high-level network of friends from Washington to Lebanon to the Vatican, where he serves as an ambassador for the tiny island nation of St. Lucia. His website shows him shaking hands and laughing with Pope Francis.

“I never imagined what the future would hold for me,” Chagoury once said of his boyhood in Nigeria. “But I knew there was a vision for my life that was greater than I could imagine.… I consider it a duty to give back.”

Since the 1990s, Chagoury has also cultivated a friendship with the Clinton family — in part by writing large checks, including a contribution of at least $1 million to the Clinton Foundation.

By the time Hillary Clinton became secretary of State, the relationship was strong enough for Bill Clinton’s closest aide to push for Chagoury to get access to top diplomats, and the agency began exploring a deal, still under consideration, to build a consulate on Chagoury family land in Lagos, Nigeria.

But even as those talks were underway, bureaucrats in other arms of the State Department were examining accusations that Chagoury had unsavory affiliations, stemming from his activities and friendships in Lebanon. After a review, Chagoury was refused a visa to enter the U.S. last year.

Chagoury is a prominent example of the nexus between Hillary Clinton’s State Department and the family’s Clinton Foundation, which has come under renewed scrutiny during her presidential run. The organization, founded as a way for the Clintons to tap their vast network for charitable works, has tackled some of the steepest challenges in the developing world, including rebuilding Haiti and fighting AIDS in Africa. It has also come under fire for its willingness to accept money from foreign governments with interest in swaying U.S. policy during Clinton’s time as secretary of State, and the controversial histories of some donors.

Part of a dictator’s inner circle

Chagoury was born in 1946 in Lagos to Lebanese parents, and as a child attended school in Lebanon. He sold shoes and cars in Nigeria, according to a biography on his website, before marrying the daughter of a prominent Nigerian businessman.

During the rule of Gen. Sani Abacha, who seized power in Nigeria in 1993, Chagoury prospered, receiving development deals and oil franchises.

Election 2016 | Live coverage on Trail Guide | Sign up for the newsletter

In the 1990s, Chagoury portrayed himself as an Abacha insider as he tried to influence American policy to be more friendly to the regime. Soon after President Clinton named Donald E. McHenry a special envoy to Nigeria in 1995, Gilbert and brother Ronald Chagoury visited McHenry in his office at Georgetown University in Washington. The U.S. was pushing for the return of democratic rule in Nigeria; Abacha, meanwhile, was eager to have his country taken off a U.S. list of nations that enabled drug trafficking, McHenry said.

“Their effort was to try and influence anyone who they thought could influence the U.S. government,” McHenry said, adding that the approach was heavy-handed. “They tried every key on the piano.”

Abacha turned out to be “one of the most notorious kleptocrats in memory,” stealing billions in public funds, acting Assistant Atty. Gen. Mythili Raman later said.

After Abacha’s death in 1998, the Nigerian government hired lawyers to track down the money. The trail led to bank accounts all over the world — some under Gilbert Chagoury's control. Chagoury, who denied knowing the funds were stolen, paid a fine of 1 million Swiss francs, then about $600,000, and gave back $65 million to Nigeria; a Swiss conviction was expunged, a spokesman for Chagoury said.

Ties to the Clintons

In the years afterward, Chagoury’s wealth grew. His family conglomerate now controls a host of businesses, including construction companies, flour mills, manufacturing plants and real estate.

He has used some of that money to build political connections. As a noncitizen, he is barred from giving to U.S. political campaigns, but in 1996, he gave $460,000 to a voter registration group steered by Bill Clinton’s allies and was rewarded with an invitation to a White House dinner. Over the years, Chagoury attended Clinton's 60th birthday fundraiser and helped arrange a visit to St. Lucia, where the former president was paid $100,000 for a speech. Clinton’s aide, Doug Band, even invited Chagoury to his wedding.

Chagoury also contributed $1 million to $5 million to the Clinton Foundation, according to its list of donors. At a 2009 Clinton Global Initiative conference, where business and charity leaders pledge to complete projects, the Chagoury Group’s Eko Atlantic development — nine square kilometers of Lagos coastal land reclaimed by a seawall — was singled out for praise. During a 2013 dedication ceremony in Lagos, just after Hillary Clinton left her post as secretary of State, Bill Clinton lauded the $1-billion Eko Atlantic as an example to the world of how to fight climate change.

“I especially thank my friends Gilbert and Ron Chagoury for making it happen,” he said.
VIDEO 2.22

-------------------

http://endingthefed.com/fox-news-exposed-massive-fraud-at-clinton-foundation-huge-panic-in-hillarys-camp.html#.V-mvZWnS1UE.facebook
Breaking: Fox News Exposed MASSIVE Fraud At Clinton Foundation… HUGE Panic IN Hillary’s CAMP
POLITICSSeptember 26, 2016 A+A-EMAILPRINT

Shocking details about the Clinton Foundation were uncovered this morning by Fox News.

While Hillary Clinton’s supporters in the liberal media are busy attacking Donald Trump, we’re learning that the State Department sought a major land deal with a Nigerian firm with ties to the Clinton Foundation. Of course, this happened while Hillary was President Obama’s Secretary of State.

This is a bombshell report:

Shortly after Hillary Clinton left the Obama administration, the State Department quietly took steps to purchase real estate in Nigeria from a firm whose parent company is owned by a major donor to the Clinton Foundation, records obtained by Fox News show.

On March 20, 2013, William P. Franklin, an “international realty specialist” at the State Department, emailed Mary E. Davis, an American diplomat stationed in Africa, instructing her to “put on Post letterhead” an “expression of interest” by the department in purchasing property at Eko Atlantic, a massive real estate development off the coast of Lagos. Franklin further instructed that the signed letter was to be “delivered to Ronald Chagoury.”

The draft letter, also obtained by Fox News, was undated and addressed to Chagoury care of his firm South Energyx Nigeria Limited, a subsidiary of the larger Chagoury Group that is spearheading the Eko Atlantic real estate venture. The State Department letter sought, among other things, to confirm that the department could proceed with “acquisition of the real property…[at] the asking price of $1,250 per square meter.”

Overtures to real estate developers from State Department officials scouting locations for embassies, consulates and other diplomatic facilities would ordinarily not arouse interest. But in this case, the budding transaction – never completed, the department now says – raised eyebrows because Ronald Chagoury is the brother and business partner, in the Chagoury Group, of Gilbert Chagoury, a Lebanese-born businessman whom federal records show has donated between $1 and $5 million to the Clinton Foundation.

Indeed, Gilbert Chagoury’s friendship with the Clintons can be traced back to the Clinton presidency. In the mid-1990s, Chagoury donated nearly $500,000 to a voter-registration drive designed to help Democratic candidates, attended a White House dinner for premium donors, and met with high-ranking officials in the Clinton White House – including Susan Rice, now President Obama’s national security adviser – who were shaping U.S. policy toward Nigeria.

More recently, the Chagourys’ close ties to the Clintons generated headlines when a separate series of emails from 2009 – between Doug Band, an aide to former President Clinton and Huma Abedin, an aide to Secretary Clinton – revealed the eagerness of the State Department to oblige a request for Chagoury to be granted access to senior officials working on Lebanon.

The State Department’s outreach to the Chagoury family, looking to buy property from the brothers, came less than a month after former President Clinton himself toured the Eko Atlantic project – for the second time. The first occasion was the ground breaking, in 2009, in which the former president participated. By all accounts, Eko Atlantic represents a staggeringly ambitious undertaking: the dredging of millions of tons of sand from the sea floor off Victoria Island and the creation of an estimated 3.5 square miles of new land, on which the Chagourys aim to establish what they call a “21st century city … for residential, commercial, financial and tourist development.”

Mr. Clinton toured the Eko Atlantic site for the second time on February 21, 2013 – twenty days after his wife left the State Department – to celebrate the Chagourys’ reclamation of 5 million square meters of land, a critical juncture in the project.

Via Fox News

There is no doubt that the Clinton Foundation’s entire purpose for existing is to allow the Clinton family the change to cash in on their political power. This scale of political corruption has never been seen before in America.

Should Hillary Clinton be disqualified for the Presidency after the corruption revelations surrounding the Clinton Foundation?

http://www.lifezette.com/polizette/new-fbi-notes-uncover-lies-free-passes/
New FBI Notes Uncover More Lies, More Free Passes
Giuliani suggests investigation rigged from the start, designed for the 'purpose' of giving immunity
by Edmund Kozak | 24 Sep 2016 at 5:22 PM
The newest revelation to come out of the FBI investigation into Hillary Clinton’s private email server is that President Obama may have lied about knowing of its existence.

The batch of documents released Friday night includes Huma Abedin’s April 5, 2016 FBI interview, in which she was shown an email Obama had sent to Clinton using a pseudonym, suggesting the president knew she was using a private server.

“To immunize basically all the key players in the case kind of sounds like a case you’re trying to make go away”
But this isn’t the only lie exposed by the release of documents pertaining to the FBI investigation. Indeed, in Abedin’s April 5 interview, she claimed, like Obama, to not have known of the existence of Clinton’s private server until it was revealed in the news.

But this claim is belied entirely by the testimony of Justin Cooper, one of Clinton’s IT men. “Cooper recalled having conversations with Huma Abedin pertaining to Hillary Clinton moving away from an AT&T provided email account to establishing an email domain on the [private] Apple server. Cooper and Abedin discussed a covert email domain versus a domain name including the Clinton name.”

And of course, multiple lies of Hillary’s were also exposed. Clinton claimed she didn’t have any classified material on her private server. The FBI investigation proved this false. Clinton claimed her private email servers were “allowed” by State Department policy. The FBI investigation proved this false.

VIDEO 1.19 mins  OF THE LIES. 

Clinton claimed she initially turned over all of her work-related emails to the State Department in 2014. The FBI investigation proved this false. She also claimed there were no security breaches of her private servers. The FBI investigation proved this false.

The staggering number of lies uncovered throughout the FBI’s investigation led many to assume Clinton would face indictment and prosecution — many who were then shocked when FBI Director Comey announced that they would not recommend indictment.


But in a conference call with reporters Saturday, Trump surrogates Rudy Giuliani and Victoria Toensing, former Deputy Asst. Attorney General under Reagan, said it was the inevitable conclusion of an investigation which was initiated with the purpose of clearing Clinton.

Giuliani noted that the investigation uncovered the "destruction of classified or confidential government information, obstruction of justice, and related crimes" and that the perpetrators "were given immunity."

"When you read the totality so far of the FBI material … it looks like they were conducting an investigation for the purpose of giving immunity, as opposed to the purpose of determining criminality, since immunity was given to some of the key players that carried out the scheme to destroy government information," Giuliani said.

Giuliani also said it was troubling that two of the five lawyers present with Clinton during her interview, were Cheryl Mills and Heather Samuelson, who had already been witnesses in the case.

"The ADA canon of ethics rule 3.2 basically says that a lawyer can’t act as an advocate and a witness," Giuliani said. The only way that Mills and Samuelson could arguably have been involved in representing her … is if they knew she wasn’t going to be prosecuted — because the rule relates to not being able to be an advocate for someone in a case in which you’re going to be a witness," he said.

"Allowing lawyers with immunity to sit with the target of the investigation is just unheard of," Toensing added. Toensing also said the investigation featured a "seminal violation of prosecutorial protocol" from the start.

Related Content

PoliZette
Obama Used a Pseudonym to Email Clinton
New FBI notes suggest president may have misled public about when he learned of private server
"Why was there no GJ in this case?" she asked rhetorically. "All the documents the FBI complains of (being unable to obtain) ... you know how you get those? You issue a subpoena from a grand jury," she said.

"Mils would not have had to be given immunity if you had just subpoenaed her computer. All of [this] not getting docs, not getting evidence, having to grant immunity are directly related to there not being a grand jury," Toensing explained.

"To immunize basically all the key players in the case kind of sounds like a case you’re trying to make go away as opposed to one you’re trying to make in terms of a criminal case," said Giuliani. "Generally the idea of a criminal investigation is not to end up giving immunity to everyone at the end."

A FRIEND POSTED COMMENT In Watergate The actual people participating in the break in James McCord, Howard hunt and G Gordon Liddy were forced to deal with Judge John Sirica by the special counsel's office.
They were former CIA agents who kept their mouth shut until Judge Sirica started hitting them with potential 25 years sentences... Immediately they started singing like canaries and involved the White House staff John Ehrlichman , Bob Haldeman and John Dean. The FBI wasn't going to make that mistake this time. By granting immunity and covering for the actual culprits who destroy the evidence, they insured that nobody would be trading up to the real criminals like Hillary Clinton, Cheryl mills & Huma Abedin.. There was a consensus in 1972 that America was worth saving by honest government and insuring no matter what party one belong to the right thing would be done.... That is different now. There is rampant corruption at the highest levels of our government. And whether you are a democrat or a republican you should be afraid because if this is the way this country is governed into the future then we are nothing more than a banana republic

Where is Hillary Clinton? Campaign ‘Postpones’ North Carolina Fundraiser
http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/09/20/hillary-clinton-campaign-postpones-north-carolina-fundraiser/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social
by CHARLIE SPIERING20 Sep 20166,443
The Clinton campaign is postponing a fundraiser in North Carolina for unexplained reasons, while Hillary Clinton remains absent from the campaign trail.
Hillary Clinton postponed a lunch fundraiser in Chapel Hill with some of the state’s wealthiest and most prominent Democrats.

No reason was given for postponement of the Clinton event, according to CBS North Carolina. It was expected to take place at the home of Betty Craven and Michael Warner.

The event was billed as “lunch with Hillary Rodham Clinton” and costs ranged from $2,700 to $100,000.

A Clinton spokesman did not respond to a request from Breitbart News for comment.

Clinton appeared on the Tonight Show with Jimmy Fallon on Monday night, but it was previously taped in New York City on Friday.

Nothing else is on Hillary Clinton’s public campaign schedule for Tuesday, and she may be at home in Chappaqua, New York.

Clinton has a rally scheduled for Wednesday in Orlando, Florida but no public events scheduled for Thursday or Friday.

The first presidential debate takes place at Hofstra University in Hempstead, New York on Monday, September 26.

President Michelle Obama!! Hillary is Very Sick! She Will Not Make it To the Debates!!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ad_0kifMieU

Published on 14 Sep 2016
In my last few videos I said that I thought Hillary was being “thrown under the bus”. You cannot deny that she is really being tossed. I think this whole health issue is a way for her to escape from the reality of the situation. She may fake her own death to escape what she knows is coming! It may seem unusual for someone to fake their death, but when they know the alternative is justice and in her case jail or worse. It may be her best option. Hitler did it so why not Hillary!!!!

I Have been following Roger Stone for more than a year now. I didn’t want to judge him because I knew nothing about him. I have done a lot of research over the past 12 months and it turns out that Stone has been dead on in almost every area. When I heard him come out and say that the DNC will nominate Michelle Obama for president, I thought it was a joke, but he is not joking! It actually made me step back and think, is it even possible? Why would Stone say this? It’s not like him unless he is pretty certain his information is good! The whole idea becomes surreal. It definitely would achieve many of the goals of Obama. He gets a 3rd and 4th term. I just can’t see Trump and Michael going head to head in the debates. At this point I don’t see anyone that could go head to head with Trump. The DNC and the elites must be panicking! I really hope that Trump is being protected!

This is out of left field, but it’s coming from a guy that has been dead on and was part of Trump's campaign in the past. It just keeps getting more and more bizarre!!!!

Hillary Clinton's Illness Revealed
Hillary Clinton's Illness Revealed
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zr1IDQ2V1eM

I received this video from a trusted friend...neither of us like conspiracy theories...specualtion or conjecture....however, this makes perfect sense. Something is very wrong. PARKINSON'S DISEASE is cruel...no decent human being delights in the suffering of another.
I lost a dear friend last Fall who suffered with this disease..
The obvious health issues of Hillary are of concern...should be of concern. Since we can be sure the Democrats are covering for her and the liberal media...one has to ask....what is their plan??? I could never vote for Hillary, but not knowing who will actually be making the decisions she might be unable to make is concerning.
Again, despite my political differences with Hillary Clinton(and those differences are many) , I am sorry she is ill. I can, however, pray for her and have compassion without losing sight of how grave this situation could be for our nation. This just takes the habitual lying of liberals to another level...if possible.

Published on 29 Aug 2016
Videos constructed from public sources that show the true Hillary Clinton. All video used under the doctrine of FAIR USE.
I received this video from a trusted friend...neither of us like conspiracy theories...specualtion or conjecture....however, this makes perfect sense. Something is very wrong. PARKINSON'S DISEASE is cruel...no decent human being delights in the suffering of another.
I lost a dear friend last Fall who suffered with this disease..
The obvious health issues of Hillary are of concern...should be of concern. Since we can be sure the Democrats are covering for her and the liberal media...one has to ask....what is their plan??? I could never vote for Hillary, but not knowing who will actually be making the decisions she might be unable to make is concerning.
Again, despite my political differences with Hillary Clinton(and those differences are many) , I am sorry she is ill. I can, however, pray for her and have compassion without losing sight of how grave this situation could be for our nation. This just takes the habitual lying of liberals to another level...if possible.

Published on 29 Aug 2016
Videos constructed from public sources that show the true Hillary Clinton. All video used under the doctrine of FAIR USE.

http://www.jewsnews.co.il/2016/09/02/hell-yeah-what-this-black-pastor-just-said-to-hillary-clinton-will-lose-her-every-black-vote-in-america.html
HELL YEAH! What This Black Pastor Just Said to Hillary Clinton Will Lose Her EVERY Black Vote in America!
SEP 02, 2016by ADMINin DIASPORA

Pastor Mark Burns, one of Donald Trump’s most vocal black supporters, just Dropped a truth bomb on Hillary Clinton that will decimate her pyramid of LIES and RACISM!

After getting attacked by a liberal reporter who was trying to LIE to the world by falsely accusing both Trump and Pastor Burns of racism, Mark Burns was out for blood.

Not the blood of the punk blogger who tried to paint the Christian leader as racist. No, burns is out for CLINTON BLOOD!

He is tired of Hillary Clinton pretending ANYONE who supports Donald Trump is a racist since that could not be further from the truth. In fact, tons of people from ALL races want Donald to win.

“They (minorities) understand that with the Democratic Party, they have been getting a bad deal,” Burns added.

Hillary and her cronies don’t want to see America UNITED. They need us to divide based on race and religion since that is how Democrats conquer people.

“Hillary Clinton is continuously using the race-baiting objective to divide and conquer. Put blacks in one place, put Hispanics in one place. Put other ethnic groups in one place and instead of bringing us together as the United States of America, they’re consistently

FOR ENTIRE ARTICLE CLICK LINK  http://newsrcnn.thepoliticmanager.com/13842601/bpaz

http://endingthefed.com/hillarys-camp-freaking-out-as-this-video-goes-viral-no-way-to-stop-it-now.html
Hillary’s Camp Freaking Out As This Video Goes Viral… ‘No Way To Stop It Now’
POLITICSMarch 18, 2016 A+A-EMAILPRINT

Just a few (25) of the scandals, lies, and criminal activity of Hillary Clinton.

The Clintons were despicable; so were the Bushes; so is Obama. All presidents have been despicable, and the congress has always been, as Mark Twain observed, “The best money can buy.”

The fault lies with the gullible, ignorant, and stupid voters.

And in 2016 they’re ready again to vote another charlatan into office. The voters always look for a messiah to save them, because they want something for nothing. The next 8 years will be more war —perhaps a limited nuclear war; more erosion of liberty; more immigration; more outsourcing of jobs; more for the rich, less for the rest; more environmental pollution; more police brutality; more censorship; a major false-flag event; etc., etc., etc… Now, here’s sports!
Hillary Clinton: A Career Criminal
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kypl1MYuKDY
Over 8 million have viewed this video

https://conservativedailypost.com/breaking-wiki-leak-email-found-showing-secret-memo-to-obama-from-isis/

BREAKING: Wiki Leak Email Found Showing Secret Memo To Obama From ISIS
AUGUST 16, 2016 MARTIN WALSH NEWS
Assange Promises To Prove She Funded, Supplied, And Equipped ISIS
Assange Promises To Prove She Funded And Equipped ISIS In “October Surprise”
Barack Hussein Obama and Hillary Clinton continue to act clueless when it comes to ISIS. They act clueless about when they formed, where they are today, and how can we defeat them. They are lazy, but they are also severely incompetent.

Last week, Donald Trump asserted that Hillary Clinton and Obama “founded ISIS.” Trump didn’t literally mean they sat down and discussed how to create this group from scratch–or did he?

Trump’s statement is 100% accurate, and a leaked memo from the State Department proves it to be true!
Another Surprise From Assange Linking Hillary To ISIS
A month ago, it was released that Hillary Clinton received classified intelligence stating that Obama was supporting Al Qaeda in Iraq (AQI), the group that changed their name to ISIS. So, Obama is the founder of ISIS, and Hillary quickly became the co-captain of this dangerous team in 2012.

The leaked memo made it abundantly clear that AQI used Muhammad Al Adnani as their spokesman. Guess what, he is now the spokesman for ISIS. Barack Hussein Obama was literally paying them money! This is not even close to a joke or a theory. The leaked memo proves it to be factual.

Obama’s plan was to support the terrorist group until they overthrew Syrian dictator Bashar al Assad. Toppling dictators and supporting terrorist groups has NEVER worked, but Hillary continues to think so. She was a heavy proponent of this idea. Keep that point in mind.

In an August 2012 “SECRET” classified memo made its way to Hillary Clinton AND Obama.

They Used This Exact Plan We See Today And It Backfired Badly
Farrell confirmed that the report was read by Hillary Clinton via the recipient marking “RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHINGTON DC.”

The document is very lengthy and some portions are still classified, so we pieced together certain aspects to show the exact memo Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama saw.

THE GENERAL SITUATION:

A. THE SALAFIST, THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD, AND AQI ARE THE MAJOR FORCES DRIVING THE INSURGENCY IN SYRIA.

B. THE WEST, GULF COUNTRIES, AND TURKEY SUPPORT THE OPPOSITION; WHILE RUSSIA, CHINA, AND IRAN SUPPORT THE REGIME.
This report primarily discusses the background of AQI, their methods, capabilities, and that they use the spokesman of the Islamic State of Iraq Muhammad Al Adnani. Clearly there are already signs of bad things, but Hillary and Obama push even harder on this.
The Two Founders Of ISIS, Memo PROVES IT
The report continues:

AL QAEDA – IRAQ (AQI):

A. AQI IS FAMILIAR WITH SYRIA. AQI TRAINED IN SYRIA AND THEN INFILTRATED INTO IRAQ.

B. AQI SUPPORTED THE SYRIAN OPPOSITION FROM THE BEGINNING, BOTH IDEOLOGICALLY AND THROUGH THE MEDIA. AQI DECLARED ITS OPPOSITION OF ASSAD’S GOVERNMENT BECAUSE IT CONSIDERED IT A SECTARIAN REGIME TARGETING SUNNIS.
The intelligence report from 2012 also predicts that segments of Al Adnani’s AQI group will break off and join ISIS, making them much stronger:

THIS CREATES THE IDEAL ATMOSPHERE FOR AQI TO RETURN TO ITS OLD POCKETS IN MOSUL AND RAMADI, AND WILL PROVIDE A RENEWED MOMENTUM UNDER THE PRESUMPTION OF UNIFYING THE JIHAD AMONG SUNNI IRAQ AND SYRIA, AND THE REST OF THE SUNNIS IN THE ARAB WORLD AGAINST WHAT IT CONSIDERS ONE ENEMY, THE DISSENTERS. ISI COULD ALSO DECLARE AN ISLAMIC STATE THROUGH ITS UNION WITH OTHER TERRORIST ORGANIZATIONS IN IRAQ AND SYRIA, WHICH WILL CREATE GRAVE DANGER IN REGARDS TO UNIFYING IRAQ AND THE PROTECTION OF ITS TERRITORY.
Remember when American Kayla Mueller was taken hostage by ISIS and was kept as a sex slave for ISIS leader Abu Bakr Al Baghdadi? Had ISIS been destroyed from the beginning like a leaked memo warned, this atrocity wouldn’t have happen to an American!

Brave American That Was Sadly Killed In Iraq Under ISIS
Both Obama and Hillary Clinton knew ISIS was going to carry out all of the plans in all of the locations before it happened. Did they stop them? No.

This memo leaked proves Obama and Hillary saw this information in 2012, which was just before ISIS rose to their prominence in 2014. So, yes, Mr. Trump, they are the founders of ISIS. They paid them and allowed them to do whatever they wanted in the Middle East.

Here is a former Obama Pentagon official admitting Trump is right:

This report accurately predicted that ISIS would take over Mosul, Raqqa, and Ramadan. Obama and Hillary say Trump lacks the mental capacity, yet these two weak leaders paid ISIS and allowed them to grow into the world’s largest jihadi network. Who lacks the mental fortitude now?

Assange says that he plans to release an “October surprise” that he guarantees will lead to Hillary’s criminal trial, but we have come across an issue. Assange has been receiving thousands of death threats. It is reported that the higher ups are working to take him out before he can release the documentation.

If we don’t continue to share these leaks, he can’t accomplish justice like he is risking his life to. We have reports of social media censoring these type of posts, but they can’t stop them if they are heavily shared. Please show this to everyone! Obama and Hillary are the founders of ISIS.

Trump was 100% correct and leaked classified memo’s prove it to be true. If elected, Hillary may give rise to ISIS 2.0, and we will never be able to stop them.

http://www.breitbart.com/video/2016/08/24/hillary-lot-of-smoke-but-no-fire-with-clinton-foundation/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social
Hillary: ‘Lot of Smoke,’ But ‘No Fire’ With Clinton Foundation
On Wednesday’s broadcast of CNN’s “AC 360,” Democratic presidential nominee former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton argued that with the Clinton Foundation, “there’s a lot of smoke and there’s no fire.” And that recently announced changes to the Clinton Foundation’s practices that will be implemented if she’s elected are due to “unique circumstances” that didn’t exist during her tenure at the State Department.

Clinton was asked, “Why was it okay for the Clinton Foundation to accept foreign donations when you were secretary of state, but it wouldn’t be okay if you were president?”

She answered, “Well, what we did when I was secretary of state, as I said, went above and beyond anything that was required, anything that any charitable organization has to do. Now, obviously, if I am president, there will be some unique circumstances, and that’s why the foundation has laid out additional, unprecedented –.”

Host Anderson Cooper then followed up, “But didn’t those unique circumstances exist when you were secretary of state?”

Hillary responded, “No, no. You know, look, Anderson, I know there’s a lot of smoke and there’s no fire. This AP report, put in it context, this excludes nearly 2,000 meetings I had with world leaders, plus countless other meetings with US government officials when I was secretary of state. It looked at a small portion of my time, and it drew the conclusion, and made the suggestion that my meetings with people like the great Elie Wiesel, or Melinda Gates, or the Nobel Prize winner Muhammad Yunus were somehow due to connections with the foundation, instead of their status as highly respected global leaders. That is absurd. These are people I was proud to meet with, who any secretary of state would have been proud to meet with, to hear about their work, and their insights.”

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-us-2016-37168505?ocid=socialflow_facebook&ns_mchannel=social&ns_campaign=bbcnews&ns_source=facebook
US election: Why is Clinton's foundation so controversial?
Anthony Zurcher
North America reporter
23 August 2016
 From the section US Election 2016
Chelsea and Bill Clinton watch Hillary Clinton at a meeting of the Clinton Global InitiativeImage copyrightGETTY IMAGES
The Clinton Foundation's value is in the eye of the beholder. It has been lauded as force for good in the world. It has also been condemned as a "slush fund" for the Clinton family and a front for official corruption. Either way, it has become a growing source of discomfort for a Hillary Clinton presidential campaign that would much rather have voters and the media focus on Donald Trump and his finances.
So what is the Clinton Foundation, anyway?
The Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation is an international charitable organisation founded in 1997, originally to establish the Bill Clinton presidential library.
Unlike personally endowed "private foundations" that serve as a pass-through for donations to other groups that do the on-the-ground work, the Clinton Foundation is an "operating foundation" - which means it primarily conducts its own charitable activities.
The organisation's goal, as stated on its website, is decidedly grand: "We build partnerships between businesses, NGOs, governments, and individuals everywhere to work faster, leaner and better; to find solutions that last; and to transform lives and communities from what they are today to what they can be, tomorrow."
The foundation has 11 major programmes focusing on agriculture in Africa, combating childhood obesity, economic development in South America, earthquake relief in Haiti, reducing the cost of Aids drugs and mitigating climate change.
Bill Clinton in Tanzania in 2007Image copyrightGETTY IMAGES
Image caption
The foundation's work on HIV took Bill Clinton to Tanzania in 2007
It also operates the Clinton Global Initiative, an annual gathering of political leaders, business executives, non-profit officials and celebrities that discuss solutions to international problems.
The foundation reports that it has raised $2bn (£1.5bn), employs more than 2,000 workers and maintains an annual budget of more than $223m (£170m).
The rating group Charity Watch gives the Clinton Foundation an "A" and reports that 88% of the money the foundation brings in goes to its programmes, with the rest spent on overheads - surpassing the benchmark for reputable charity groups.
In an extensive profile, the Washington Post details the rather unorthodox way the foundation evolved into its current sprawling, multibillion-dollar form.

"It was not designed as a master plan but rather has grown, one brainstorm at a time, in accordance with the ambitious, loyal, restless and often scattered nature of its primary namesake," the Post reporters write. "Many programs were sparked by chance encounters in Bill Clinton's life."
They describe Mr Clinton as a "convener who wrangles rich people's money for poor people's problems".
Who are these "rich people" donors?
The Clinton Foundation's list of donors who have given more than a million dollars is a hodgepodge of international aid organisations, national governments, corporations and wealthy international elites.
There's the usual collection of prominent charitable groups, such as the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Children's Investment Fund, the Rockefeller Foundation and the Pritzker Family Foundation.
Bill Clinton listens as Digicel head Dennis O'Brien speaks at a Clinton Initiative event.Image copyrightGETTY IMAGES
Image caption

Digicel head Dennis O'Brien has contributed more than $10m to the Clinton Foundation
The contributor roll also includes some heavy-hitting FOBs (friends of Bill, as they're often called) with a decided entertainment-industry tilt, such as American media mogul Fred Eychaner, Ukrainian steel executive Victor Pinchuk, Irish communications billionaire Denis O'Brien and Egyptian investor Haim Saban.
Canadian mining entrepreneur and film-producer Frank Giustra has contributed more than $100m to the foundation's various enterprises and is on its board of directors.
The governments of the Netherlands, Kuwait, Norway, Australia and Saudi Arabia also are big-money donors, as are the companies Exxonmobil, Cisco, Booz Allen Hamilton, Anheuser-Busch, Coca-Cola, Barclay's bank and Tracfone Wireless.
All in all, more than half of the million-dollar-plus contributors are from outside the US.
Why has the foundation been controversial?
An organisation that brings in billions of dollars in donations from around the world and is operated by an ex-president and a possible future president who served at a high level in another presidency creates all sorts of possible conflicts of interest.

It's something the Obama White House was keenly aware of when it vetted Mrs Clinton for the secretary of state job in 2009. Before she was offered the Cabinet-level position White House adviser Valerie Jarrett negotiated an ethics agreement with Bruce Linsey, then the head of the Clinton Foundation, that set out a separation between the charity organisation and the State Department.
Mrs Clinton signed a document in which she promised to remove herself from participation in any matter that could have a "direct and predictable effect" on the foundation unless she had a written waiver from the administration.
Despite these paper pledges, Clinton critics assert that the foundation created the possibility that donors could unduly influence Mrs Clinton's official actions and provide individuals with special access to her.
What kind of actions or access are we talking about?
The 2015 book Clinton Cash by Peter Schweizer laid out numerous examples of Clinton Foundation donations that were followed by S
tate Department actions that were favourable to the donor.
The New York Times, in an April 2015 article, took a detailed look at one such instance.
In 2010 the State Department approved a move by the Russian state-owned company Rosatom to purchase a Canadian mining company with uranium mineral rights on US soil after a bank with ties to the Russian company paid Mr Clinton $500,000 for a speaking engagement in Moscow. The Canadian company in question was founded by million-dollar foundation donor Frank Giustra.
The Clinton campaign has been quick to point out that the State Department wasn't the only US government agency that had to sign off on the deal and that there was no evidence that Mrs Clinton did anything improper.
Hillary Clinton and her top aide Huma Abedin in New York.Image copyrightGETTY IMAGES
Image caption
Huma Abedin was in regular email communication with Clinton Foundation officials

There have been no clear quid-pro-quo connections found in any of Schweizer's list of alleged transgressions.
Questions about special access for donors surfaced in August 2016, when emails on the private server Mrs Clinton maintained while secretary of state revealed that the firewall between the foundation and State Department wasn't always impregnable.
For instance, foundation executive Doug Band contacted top Clinton State Department official Huma Abedin - who also was also paid as an independent contractor by the foundation - about arranging special government meetings for donors such as Crown Prince Salman of Bahrain, weight-loss drink executive S Daniel Abraham and Lebanese-Nigerian Gilbert Chagoury.
"We need Gilbert Chagoury to speak to the substance person re Lebanon," Band wrote to Abedin and Clinton aide Cheryl Mills in one email. "As you know, he's a key guy there and to us and is loved in Lebanon. Very imp[ortant]."

Clinton campaign officials have said that many of the meetings never happened and, in any event, Mrs Clinton never took actions based on contributions to the foundation.

That hasn't stopped another round of questions about the foundation, however.
"The Clintons' cosy relationship with their foundation's global patrons was a problem when Hillary was secretary of state and it is a problem now that she's running for president," writes Slate's Josh Vorhees.
Kevin Drum of the liberal Mother Jones magazine is unimpressed, however, saying Mrs Clinton ran the department with "a surprisingly high level of integrity".

"Lots of people talked to Huma Abedin to try to set up meetings with Hillary Clinton," he writes. "Generally speaking, Abedin treated them politely but told them to get lost. That's about it."
On 23 August, the Associated Press reported that during the first two years of Mrs Clinton's tenure as secretary of state, more than half the non-governmental, non-foreign individuals Mrs Clinton had official meetings or phone calls with were donors to the Clinton Foundation.
"The frequency of the overlaps shows the intermingling of access and donations, and fuels perceptions that giving the foundation money was a price of admission for face time with Clinton," Stephen Braun and Eileen Sullivan write.
The Clinton campaign called the AP report "outrageous" and that Mrs Clinton had around 1,700 meetings in her first two years in office, of which only 85 were with foundation donors - some of whom were Nobel Prize laureates and leaders of major charity groups, like Melinda Gates.
There have been enough doubts raised about the nature of the ties between the foundation and the State Department, however, that the Federal Bureau of Investigation considered opening a public corruption investigation into the matter.
FBI Director James Comey testifies before Congress on Hillary Clinton's private email serverImage copyrightGETTY IMAGES
Image caption

FBI Director James Comey has refused to comment on whether there is an investigation into the Clinton Foundation.
Why didn't the FBI investigate the foundation?
According to press reports, earlier in 2016 three FBI field offices recommended launching a formal probe into the possibility of criminal conflict of interest between the foundation and the State Department after a bank informed the bureau of "suspicious activity" by an unnamed foreigner who gave money to the foundation.
The Justice Department, which had conducted its own review of allegations made in Schweizer's Clinton Cash book, reportedly told the FBI that it concluded there were no grounds for a formal investigation.
Jump media playerMedia player helpOut of media player. Press enter to return or tab to continue.
Media captionClinton defended her email use in March 2015
According to conservative writer Noah Rothman of Commentary magazine, it is "almost impossible to divorce the Obama Justice Department's transparently political handling of the Clinton email saga with its transparently political handling of the Clinton Foundation woes".

There are some reports in conservative media that the federal attorneys are conducting a separate investigation into the Clinton foundation, although there has been no confirmation from any of the parties involved.
Clinton campaign spokesman Brian Fallon has called these stories "baseless".
The Clinton campaign isn't concerned?
Even as the Clinton team denies the various allegations and rumours swirling around the Clinton Foundation, it has taken some concrete steps to try to defuse the situation.
On 18 August, Mr Clinton announced that the foundation would no longer accept foreign or corporate donations if Mrs Clinton were to be elected president. In addition he said he would stop giving paid speeches for the duration of the campaign, end the annual Clinton Global Initiative meetings and step down from the organisation's board of directors during his wife's time in the White House.
The move doesn't apply to the Clinton Health Access Initiative, which works to lower the cost of Aids drugs in developing nations. It has a separate board of directors and will consider a similar move at a later date.
Former Pennsylvania Governor Ed Rendell speaks in Washington, DC.Image copyrightGETTY IMAGES
Image caption

Former Pennsylvania Governor Ed Rendell thinks the Clinton Foundation should be shuttered

Mr Clinton's announced steps may not be enough to assuage concerns about the possibility of conflicts of interest, however.
Earlier in the week the Boston Globe's editorial board urged the foundation to stop accepting donations of any kind for the remainder of the campaign and shut down entirely if Mrs Clinton is elected president.
"If the foundation's donors are truly motivated by altruism, and not by the lure of access to the Clintons, then surely they can find other ways to support the foundation's goals," the editors write. "And in four or eight years, the Clinton family could always form a new foundation and re-establish their charitable efforts."
New York magazine's Jonathan Chait echoed this call, writing that the foundation is "hardly a large or unique source of corruption", but is "a source of grubby, low-level access headaches".

Former Pennsylvania Governor Ed Rendell, who served as chair of the Democratic National Committee during the last year of Mr Clinton's presidency, said it would be "impossible to keep the foundation open without at least the appearance of a problem".
In June Mr Clinton said that the foundation would make "some changes" if his wife were elected president, but "we'll just have to cross that bridge when we come to it".
Given the level of uproar, however, the bridge may be underfoot.
So what does Donald Trump have to say about all this?
Unsurprisingly, the Republican nominee isn't holding back when it comes to lobbing charges of criminality against his Democratic opponent. He has repeatedly called the Clinton Foundation a "pay to play" scheme that allowed Mrs Clinton to influence-peddle while at the State Department.

At a rally on 22 August Mr Trump called for a special prosecutor to investigate the Clinton Foundation, adding that the Justice Department and the FBI can't be trusted to "quickly or impartially investigate Hillary Clinton's new crimes".
Earlier that day, the campaign released a statement calling for the foundation to be shut down immediately.
Donald Trump speaks in Fredericksburg, Virginia.Image copyrightGETTY IMAGES
Image caption

Donald Trump is calling for an independent investigation into the Clinton Foundation
"It is now clear that the Clinton Foundation is the most corrupt enterprise in political history," Mr Trump said in the release. "What they were doing during crooked Hillary's time as secretary of state was wrong then, and it is wrong now."
The swirls of controversy around the Clinton Foundation have given Mr Trump and his campaign surrogates the opportunity to go on the attack against Mrs Clinton after weeks of unforced errors and sinking poll numbers.
Mrs Clinton already suffers from negative ratings for her honesty and integrity in opinion surveys, so many Americans may be predisposed to believe the allegations of improper behaviour while secretary of state are valid.
Mr Trump has serious favourability issues of his own, of course, but it seems like the strategy for the duration of the campaign will be to try to drag Mrs Clinton down as low as possible - and his campaign seems convinced the foundation is a key point of weakness.