Tommy Robinson: for The Rebel Media

UK: Tommy Robinson reportedly transferred to maximum security prison described as “jihadi training camp”
By Robert Spencer on Jul 16, 2019 03:00 pm
UK: Tommy Robinson reportedly transferred to maximum security prison described as “jihadi training camp”
A maximum security prison rife with unchecked jihad activity — clearly British authorities want Tommy Robinson dead, and they don’t care who knows it. They have set their nation on the path to suicide, and they’re bent on keeping it there. “Tommy Robinson Reportedly Transferred to Prison Described as ‘Jihadi Training Camp,’” by Jack Montgomery, […]
MORE https://www.jihadwatch.org/2019/07/uk-tommy-robinson-reportedly-transferred-to-maximum-security-prison-described-as-jihadi-training-camp


Islamic Republic of Pakistan: Efforts intensify to protect Islamic law, including blasphemy laws
By Christine Douglass-Williams on Jul 16, 2019 02:00 pm
Islamic Republic of Pakistan: Efforts intensify to protect Islamic law, including blasphemy laws
Imprisonment and/or death for blasphemy is an aspect of criminal law in Pakistan, as per the Sharia. Even false accusations of blasphemy can result in harsh punishments — from jail to death — usually against Christians. And Pakistan is making no apologies for this, just as Western dhimmis continue to apologize for their freedom of […]
MORE https://www.jihadwatch.org/2019/07/pakistan-efforts-intensify-to-protect-islamic-law-including-blasphemy-and-finality-of-prophethood


Hamas walks back call to murder all Jews: “These statements do not represent the movement’s official positions”
By Robert Spencer on Jul 16, 2019 01:00 pm
Hamas walks back call to murder all Jews: “These statements do not represent the movement’s official positions”
After Fathi Hammad was a bit too forthright, Hamas is now once again busy trying to deceive the Infidels. Its Charter, which is still in force, says this: “The Prophet, Allah bless him and grant him salvation, has said: ‘The Day of Judgement will not come about until Moslems fight the Jews (killing the Jews), […]
MORE https://www.jihadwatch.org/2019/07/pakistan-efforts-intensify-to-protect-islamic-law-including-blasphemy-and-finality-of-prophethood


Palestinian Authority doubles Pay-For-Slay salary of jihad murderer of three Israeli teenagers
By Christine Douglass-Williams on Jul 16, 2019 12:00 pm
Palestinian Authority doubles Pay-For-Slay salary of jihad murderer of three Israeli teenagers
Western donations to the Palestinian territories are helping to support the Palestinian Authority’s rewarding of those who commit jihad attacks against Israelis. Under the Palestinian Authority’s “pay for slay” program, a jihadi prisoner’s monthly salary increases the longer he stays in jail for murdering Israelis. Three Israeli teen boys were kidnapped and murdered five years […]
MORE  https://www.jihadwatch.org/2019/07/pay-for-slay-salary-doubles-for-jihadist-in-kidnap-murder-of-three-israeli-teens

Robert Spencer video: The hard truth about Islam
By Robert Spencer on Jul 16, 2019 11:00 am
Robert Spencer video: The hard truth about Islam
From YAFTV: When Islamic terror strikes our country, we’re told by the Left that Islam is just a “religion of peace that has occasionally been hijacked by extremists.” But is it? Here’s the truth, courtesy of Robert Spencer: Islam is the opposite of a religion of peace. In fact, Islam is the only religion which […]

MORE https://www.jihadwatch.org/2019/07/robert-spencer-video-the-hard-truth-about-islam



The Once and Future Biafra? (Part 2)
By Hugh Fitzgerald on Jul 16, 2019 10:00 am
The Once and Future Biafra? (Part 2)
Ethnic and religious tensions go at least as far back, in modern Nigeria, to 1945, when Muslim Hausa-Fulani people killed 300 Christian Ibos in Jos. It was described thus: “At Jos in 1945, a sudden and savage attack by Northerners took the Easterners [Christian Ibos] completely by surprise, and before the situation could be brought […]
MORE https://www.jihadwatch.org/2019/07/the-once-and-future-biafra-part-2



BBC’s Islamic propaganda: UK TV show features character converting to Islam “and its positive impact on his life”
By Robert Spencer on Jul 16, 2019 09:00 am
BBC’s Islamic propaganda: UK TV show features character converting to Islam “and its positive impact on his life”
My latest in the Geller Report: Here is the latest item in the ongoing dumpster fire of Britain’s cultural and civilizational collapse: according to the MailOnline, the British TV drama EastEnders will feature a character who is in prison for killing his sister converting to Islam “to Islam to find peace after leaving prison.” The […]
MORE https://www.jihadwatch.org/2019/07/robert-spencer-uk-tv-show-to-feature-jailed-character-converting-to-islam-and-its-positive-impact-on-his-life


Huffington Post: “Muslim women subject to harassment when swimming while wearing less-than-revealing swim attire”
By Christine Douglass-Williams on Jul 16, 2019 08:30 am
Huffington Post: “Muslim women subject to harassment when swimming while wearing less-than-revealing swim attire”
A new declaration of victimhood: a Huffington Post report states that “over the last decade, Muslim women across the globe have been subject to an increasing amount of harassment when swimming while wearing less-than-revealing swim attire.” Muslim women facing opposition when wearing “less-than-revealing swim attire” in pools has nothing to do with their being Muslim. […]
MORE https://www.jihadwatch.org/2019/07/muslim-women-deemed-discriminated-against-in-their-fight-to-wear-clothing-in-pools


Russia: Seven Muslims plotted to stage a collision on high-speed railway between Moscow and St. Petersburg
By Robert Spencer on Jul 16, 2019 08:00 am
Russia: Seven Muslims plotted to stage a collision on high-speed railway between Moscow and St. Petersburg
Everywhere around the world it’s the same story: “Islamophobia” breaking out all over. “7 IS Suspects Jailed for Plot Against Russian High-Speed Train,” Moskva News Agency, July 12, 2019: Seven men believed to be supporters of the Islamic State terror group have been sentenced to lengthy prison terms in Russia on Friday for attempting to […]
MORE  https://www.jihadwatch.org/2019/07/russia-seven-muslims-plotted-to-stage-a-collision-on-high-speed-railway-between-moscow-and-st-petersburg

France: Muslim who murdered Jewish woman while screaming “Allahu akbar” not responsible because he smoked marijuana
By Robert Spencer on Jul 16, 2019 07:30 am
France: Muslim who murdered Jewish woman while screaming “Allahu akbar” not responsible because he smoked marijuana
Imagine (although this would never happen) if this had been a Jew or Christian who smoked pot, screamed about his religion, and killed a Muslim. Would he be found “not criminally responsible”? Of course not. But in France today, as all over Western Europe, the primary job of the courts and law enforcement authorities is […]
MORE https://www.jihadwatch.org/2019/07/france-muslim-who-murdered-jewish-woman-while-screaming-allahu-akbar-not-responsible-because-he-smoked-marijuana

Tommy Robinson on trial shows the death of free speech in the UK
https://israelunwired.com/tommy-robinson-on-trial-shows-the-death-of-free-speech-in-the-uk/
It is almost too shocking to believe. All of this in the UK? What happened to Western values? Democracy? Free speech? This is NOT good!
Tommy Robinson on trial shows the death of free speech in the UK
By Phil Schneider -  July 15, 2019 3343 0
Tommy Robinson is one controversial person. He has been labeled all kinds of horrible things by so many news outlets. However, he is actually not as radical as most of his detractors think. Yes, it is true that he speaks about things that are completely politically incorrect. But, is it true that he poses a danger in society? I don’t think so. He is no more dangerous than an activist in the United States who speaks loudly about the dangers of illegal immigration. It is totally reasonable to disagree with his opinions, and even more, with his manner of speaking. However, he should not be shut up. His opinions should be argued against, and let the masses decide. He does not call for violence against proponents of the Islamic faith. He does not pose a danger to the world. But, the people who he warns against pose the main danger to our way of life.

This Might Be Tommy Robinson's Last Interview I Wilkow
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1wdRhZV3Ofc

BlazeTV
Premiered on 10 Jul 2019
UK activist and citizen journalist Tommy Robinson is on trial this week for “contempt of court” and may end up in prison again. In his interview with Andrew Wilkow, Tommy speaks out about the death of free speech in England and the real-life consequences: “Tomorrow I will be sent to prison for the crimes of journalism. … I genuinely believe I will be killed in this prison sentence.” 

Full Interview airs Friday on https://get.blazetv.com/wilkow/.
https://facebook.com/BlazeMedia
Boost this video to reach up to 1000 people
Does the Muslim minority threaten Great Britain?
The answer is a resounding yes. Any group that creates a form of “safe space” poses a major threat to the country they are in. There are neighborhoods in London that one should be scared of walking around in. Shariah Law is not the official law of the area, but it is the unofficial norm. This is a red flag that cannot be allowed to continue. How should one who sees a major threat to their country act? Should they not speak out proudly about the rights and freedoms that are under attack? Of course it is good that people should be able to speak up about it. Free speech must be protected for situations just like this. And it is just as important for his opposition to be able to speak up against his opinions.

The goal should not be to silence anyone, but to expose those with dangerous views. Let the debates begin. We have so much more to fear from the suppression of opinions than from exposure to dangerous opinions. Tommy Robinson may or may not have dangerous opinions. Therefore, he should be exposed in daylight – not put behind bars.


Tommy Robinson’s Long Walk - to court and to prison - with Katie Hopkins
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z4NSpTvb3hI&ab_channel=KatieHopkinsOFFICIAL

Katie Hopkins OFFICIAL
Published on 14 Jul 2019
“I am doing this for our children. All our children”. 
Still in disbelief that the government would send him to court, I walked Tommy to court with his

Tommy Robinson has hit out at being banned on Facebook and Twitter as he suffered a humiliating defeat in the European elections. The former English Defence League leader, who was hit with several milkshakes during the campaign, played down his chances of winning while speaking at the count in Manchester. He said he had faced a ‘near impossible task’ in attempting to win one of the eight seats available. Robinson said it was not a fair campaign as he was unable to get across his message on social media platforms. ‘I am not allowed social media,’ he said. ‘I am not able to interact with the public.’ He added: ‘But more than anything every community I have gone to – every working class estate – I have so felt loved, (more) than I have ever felt in my life.’ Tommy Robinson says he's 'gutted' in video confessional Play Video Loaded: 0% 0:00Progress: 0% PlayMute Current Time 0:00 / Duration Time 1:21 Fullscreen MP Afzal Khan, who represents Labour in Manchester Gorton, tweeted: ‘Tommy Robinson defeated in the North West in the European Parliament. The North West rejected Fascism and chose #HopeNotHate.’ Speaking as the North West results came in, Nahella Ashraf from Manchester Stand Up To Racism said: ‘We have shown that there is no place in mainstream politics for a fascist. ‘I’d like to thank the hundreds of activists that came out across the North West to make this happen. Laughs as Tommy Robinson fails to get enough votes in the North West Play Video Loaded: 0% 0:00Progress: 0% PlayMute Current Time 0:00 / Duration Time 1:05 Fullscreen ‘The campaign Stand Up To Racism ran shows that we can pull people together regardless of how they voted in the referendum. ‘However, we cannot be complacent. We know that all the candidates running for the Tory leadership campaign will use racism to score political points. ‘We also know that the Tory austerity agenda gives the far right space to grow. We will continue to stand up to racism wherever it rears its ugly head.’
Read more: https://metro.co.uk/2019/05/27/tommy-robinson-blames-facebook-ban-admits-defeat-european-elections-9695004/?utm_source=pushly?ito=cbshare

Twitter: https://twitter.com/MetroUK | Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/MetroUK/

The most revealing conversation with a Jihadi
By Leah Rosenberg -  October 7, 2018 9724 0
This is indeed a revealing conversation.  There are people who support Shariah Law who walk around on our streets just like we do.  It is one thing to have different opinions.  Hear straight from this Muslim who was once a Christian and now believes that he is a superior person.  He believes in violence to achieve the goals of the Muslim religion, and he hides nothing.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=23&v=tLU5bWj40IA&ab_channel=RebelMedia


Violent Jihad
This spokesman believes that America has no moral ground to stand on.  He believes that Muslims should have Shariah Law in England.  Does he believe that Shariah Law should take over England?  Yes.  Does he want Shariah Law to take over in a peaceful manner?  Yes.

This man does not believe that Muslim terrorists should be criticized for their attacks against innocent civilians in England.

All he has to say is that Tommy Robinson is bad for England, and that the media is biased against Muslims.

Shariah Law
If the UK was run by Shariah Law, then people like Tommy Robinson would be charged for blasphemy.  The punishment would be the same as the punishment for killing or rape.  That is quite radical.

If anybody who insults the Muslim religion is a blasphemer, then we need to understand the ramifications of that thought.  That means that anybody who is not a Muslim would be in enormous danger.

We need to understand that there is a real and present danger to our way of life as we know it.

The Rebel
Dear Elaine, 

I’m standing outside the Old Bailey, the central criminal court of London, where the most serious crimes in the UK are tried — terrorism, murder and the like.

And, bizarrely, today that court heard the minor civil contempt of court case against Tommy Robinson. 

This is Tommy's fourth court hearing in that ongoing saga — and the only result of today’s briefing hearing was to schedule yet another hearing — a month from now.

So the contempt of court case still hangs over him.

Nothing about Tommy Robinson’s case is right. His improper conviction in Leeds in May; his abusive treatment in prison; the Attorney General’s obsession with getting him a second time. 

It was depressing for that reason. But it was incredibly encouraging because of what was happening outside the court: 1,500 cheering Tommy supporters. And after Tommy left the courtroom, he stayed outside for hours, talking to everyone he could.



I’ve filed several video reports about today’s events — especially the crowds outside.

To see all of my reports, visit www.TommyTrial.com. 

I promise I’ll keep reporting the truth about Tommy, just as long as the mainstream media keeps lying about him! 

Yours truly,

Ezra Levant

P.S. I’ll be back in court on October 23rd — I don’t trust the mainstream media to tell the truth about Tommy. If you can please help me cover the cost of my airfare and hotel, I’d be grateful — you can do that at www.TommyTrial.com.
 
MORE https://www.therebel.media/ezra_levant_interviews_tommy_robinson_outside_london_courtroom?utm_campaign=el_tommy_trial_sept27&utm_medium=email&utm_source=therebel

Ezra Levant interviews Tommy Robinson outside London courtroom
EZRA LEVANT
REBEL COMMANDER
 
I flew to London today at Tommy Robinson's request, to cover his retrial in a London courtroom. However, the "trial" only lasted about 20 minutes, and the judge rescheduled it for October 23.

WATCH you tube 4.28mins 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7lNdYCLTDIk&ab_channel=RebelMedia


After leaving the courtroom, Tommy greeted over a thousand supporters. Many had come from as far away as Hong Kong and Australia, so he told me he was determined to shake hands with every single one of them before going home.

SEE ALL my reports on today's events at TommyTrial.com

PLEASE HELP COVER THE COST of Ezra's reporting. Donate in Canadian dollars here, or in British pounds here.

The Rebel
Ezra Levant

Dear Elaine,

Tommy Robinson just phoned me.

He’s supposed to be having a quiet vacation with his family.

But he can’t.

He’s had to go to the hospital twice, because of the physical abuse he suffered in prison.

They starved him. He lost 40 pounds in two months. He clearly has a form of post-traumatic stress, too, from being locked up in solitary confinement for so long, and being constantly threatened with violence from Muslim prison gangs.

You can see that just by watching the video of him when he was released. He’s not quite himself yet.

He will get better.

Even just being out of prison, and playing with his kids, will help him heal.

But Tommy told me the bad news: they want to send him back to prison.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fn23rYG-5js&ab_channel=RebelMedia



Three weeks from now. September 4.

It’s outrageous.

Just last week the Court of Appeal confirmed that Tommy was improperly tried, improperly convicted, improperly sentenced, and improperly imprisoned. That’s why they set him free. It was a total vindication of everything Tommy had said.

But now the UK government wants to do it all over again.

Here, watch this short video, I’ll explain:



They’re not done with Tommy.

They want to put him through a second trial — for the exact same thing, his Facebook livestream that day back in May, in Leeds.

They want to put him in prison again.

That will probably kill him.

You saw him after two months in solitary confinement. Now imagine him after 13 months.

Tommy is in jeopardy. So Tommy phoned me and asked me to help him one more time.

Just until he’s better.

And I told him I would.

He needs help to pay for the lawyers — because they’ve got to prepare for that September hearing.

So I’ve talked to the lawyers. They’re already working on it.

And I’ve set up the SaveTommy.com crowdfunding page again.

The British government has unlimited funds. I think they’re trying to break Tommy — physically, psychologically and now financially.

There’s no way he can do this by himself. But if enough of us stand together with him, we’ve got a chance.

Can you please go to SaveTommy.com to help? 100% of the funds will go to pay for the lawyers. Any surplus will go to Tommy’s wife and kids.

I thought we were done last week. But we’re not. The UK government wants to fight with Tommy — now that they think he’s weakened.

Well, they forgot about one thing — they forgot about us, didn’t they?

Please go to SaveTommy.com — and let’s help our friend one last time.

Yours truly,

Ezra Levant

P.S. Please help with Tommy’s legal fees. His lawyers need to prepare for the case immediately. You can do that here.https://savetommy-therebeluk.nationbuilder.com/save_tommy_robinson_again

P.P.S. We’re also starting a massive petition, that we will personally deliver to the new Attorney General, demanding that they suspend their persecution of Tommy. He’s already served two months in prison improperly — it’s astounding that the UK government wants him to serve more time. Please sign our petition here. https://www.therebel.media/save_tommy_robinson_petition?utm_campaign=el_save_tommy_again_uk&utm_medium=email&utm_source=therebel

The Rebel · Box 61056 Eglinton/Dufferin RO, Toronto, ON M6E 5B2, Canada .
You can also keep up with The Rebel Media on Twitter.

https://www.therebel.media/exclusive_tommy_robinson_tells_ezra_levant_about_prison_treatment_thanks_supporters?utm_campaign=el_tommy_interview&utm_medium=email&utm_source=therebel

The Rebel

Dear Elaine,

Last night I went to visit Tommy Robinson after he was released from prison.

It was glorious to see him reunited with his beautiful wife and three lovely children. Those kids — who missed their dad so painfully — had smiles on their faces that I will never forget.

Tommy invited me to join the family for dinner, but I didn’t want to intrude in their private time. But I did ask him to sit down with me for ten minutes, to tell the world how he was doing.

And as I listened, my joy turned to sorrow, and then to rage.

Because Tommy was physically and psychologically abused in prison.

You can see it in his face. His appearance is shocking — he lost 40 pounds of weight in just two months.

If he were to have stayed in prison much longer, I fear his very life would have been in danger.

Here is the video of my interview:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=15&v=QoAxe0J3k3c


WATCH https://www.therebel.media/exclusive_tommy_robinson_tells_ezra_levant_about_prison_treatment_thanks_supporters?utm_campaign=el_tommy_interview&utm_medium=email&utm_source=therebel

I met with Tommy again this morning to talk about his next steps, now that he’s free. I’m sure he’ll have much more to say later — but for now, he’s going on a vacation with his family, to reconnect with the ones he loves.

But watch this video and answer me this:

Doesn't the government’s treatment of Tommy Robinson meet the legal definition of torture?

Yours truly,

Ezra Levant

P.S. Tommy told me he was so grateful to our Rebel viewers for crowdfunding his legal defence. We have now paid off Tommy’s last legal bill. Thank you.

P.P.S. We will continue to support Tommy — by reporting on his case, and in other ways that he may request. If you wish to help cover the costs of our reporting of his legal appeal over the past few weeks (i.e. two flights to London) you can click here — thank you.

The Rebel · Box 61056 Eglinton/Dufferin RO, Toronto, ON M6E 5B2, Canada
You can also keep up with The Rebel Media on Twitter.

Dear Elaine,
I’m in London, at the Royal Courts of Justice. And moments ago, Tommy Robinson won his appeal!
The court of appeal, led by the Lord Chief Justice himself, ruled that Tommy’s conviction of contempt of court, back in May in Leeds, was legally improper.
I have now had a chance to go through the court’s detailed reasons. They are stunning. It is an absolute vindication of Tommy — and a devastating rebuke to the injustices he has suffered!
The court found that:

* Tommy should not have been put on trial that same day
* Tommy’s lawyer did not have proper time to prepare his case
* the judge in Leeds never clearly presented what Tommy had allegedly done wrong
* the judge did not watch the entire video of Tommy, that supposedly was proof of his contempt
* the judge did not follow the criminal procedure rules
* the sentence was disproportionate; and
* Tommy’s treatment in prison was inappropriate

It was staggering. Everything Tommy has ever said about the system being unfairly rigged against him was proved true — by no-one less than the Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales!

The court said the entire Leeds contempt hearing has to be done again — but it’s not certain that the Attorney General will even choose to do that, given how badly they’ve been trounced today.

I will continue to file reports about this at www.TommyTrial.com, and I expect to interview Tommy himself later today or tomorrow — obviously I want to let him reconnect with his family, first.

But let me thank you for your support — I’m so proud that our Rebel viewers crowdfunded Tommy’s legal fees. This victory today is in part due to you!

Tommy is free today.

And the rest of us are all a little bit freer too.

Yours truly,

Ezra Levant

P.S. Yesterday I paid the last of Tommy’s legal fees — thank you for that. Any surplus will go to Tommy’s family. We will now shut down the crowdfunding project to pay for those costs.

P.P.S. If you feel like helping me cover the costs of my trip to London — that’s a separate fund — please click here. It’s not much — the cost of my hotel and flight, and some cab fare, but I’d appreciate it. Click here to help with that, if you like my news reports.

The Rebel UK · United Kingdom

https://www.theobjectivestandard.com/2018/06/tommy-robinsons-right-to-free-speech-morally-trumps-all-laws-that-violate-it-even-that-one/
Tommy Robinson’s Right to Free Speech Morally Trumps All Laws That Violate It. (Even That One.)
Craig Biddle   June 9, 2018  
Much debate has erupted regarding the recent jailing of British activist Tommy Robinson. This case is telling, not only in regard to the current culture in Britain, but also in regard to the culture in the United States, where many people are unaware of the principles that morally govern the situation.

On May 25, 2018, Robinson was arrested, tried, convicted, and sentenced to thirteen months in prison. He was arrested reportedly for “breaching the peace” by livestreaming outside the Leeds Crown Court, where a trial is underway in which twenty-seven Muslim men and two Muslim women are alleged to have raped, trafficked, drugged, and sexually exploited more than one hundred girls as young as eleven years old.

During his seventy-five minute livestream (which I recommend watching), Robinson mostly talked quietly to himself and his viewers about the widespread problem of Muslims raping children throughout England. He also spoke to some of the defendants as they arrived at the courthouse, asking, “How are you feeling about your verdict?” and noting, “You’ve got your prison bag with you.” Robinson stayed off court property, as by the letter of the law he was required to do. He gave the police no reason to arrest him.1

Even so, shortly after Judge Geoffrey Marson peered down on him from a courthouse window, Robinson was arrested allegedly for “breaching the peace.” He reportedly pleaded guilty to a charge of “contempt of court” for reporting information that could “prejudice” the ongoing trial, which is being conducted in three parts, the second of which was coming to a conclusion the week of Robinson’s arrest. Within a few hours, Marson convicted Robinson and sentenced him to thirteen months in prison for the alleged contempt of court.

If we look at the full context of relevant facts surrounding this case, however, we can see that the real reason Robinson was arrested and jailed is that he has spoken out vociferously against jihad, Sharia law, Islam-inspired child rape, and mass Islamic immigration into England.

Whether Robinson is right or wrong about any of that is beside the point here. People have a moral right to speak their minds regardless of whether they are right or wrong (so long as they do not incite violence, commit fraud, or the like). As Ayn Rand put it, “The principle of free speech is not concerned with the content of a man’s speech and does not protect only the expression of good ideas, but all ideas. If it were otherwise, who would determine which ideas are good and which are forbidden? The government?”2 (Alas, in the UK, apparently, yes.)

Nor is our present concern whether Robinson broke British law.3 Contrary to the utterly disappointing positions taken by Daniel Hannan and Nigel Farage on this matter, the mere fact that someone broke a law says nothing about whether his actions are moral or immoral, rights respecting or rights violating, worthy of support or of condemnation.4

Many laws throughout history and today—in Britain, the United States, and other countries—were or are immoral, many obscenely so. For instance:

In Nazi Germany, citizens were required by law to turn Jews over to the Gestapo.
In Iran today, citizens are required to report homosexuals to the Islamic government for punishment in accordance with Sharia law.
In North Korea, it is illegal to criticize the government at all.
In the United States in the 1850s, Northerners were required by law to return escaped slaves to their Southern “owners.”
In 1955 Alabama, it was illegal for Rosa Parks to refuse to give her bus seat to a white person.
In the United States today, it’s illegal to consume certain drugs that might enhance, extend, or save your life, unless the FDA gives you permission.
And so on.

Just as genuine advocates of individual rights do not argue that an “illegal” immigrant who has done nothing to violate anyone’s rights should be imprisoned or deported because “he broke the law,” so, too, we do not argue that an individual who engages in “illegal” yet perfectly rights-respecting speech should be jailed because “he broke the law.”

People are not morally required to uphold or obey rights-violating laws. And when someone breaks an egregiously rights-violating law (such as a censorship law) in an effort to expose an important truth (as Robinson has), he deserves praise and moral defense, not excoriation and legal myopics.

Of course, there are contexts in which it is morally right to obey laws that are morally wrong. For instance, generally speaking, it is morally right to pay your taxes, because refusing to pay them will land you in jail. But when a law is an obscene violation of rights, violating it may be perfectly moral or even morally mandatory.

In the case of Robinson, the law he (allegedly) broke—a law prohibiting him from speaking his mind or reporting about a trial involving Muslims accused of mass child rape—is a violation of his right to freedom of speech. If he violated that law, and if he did so because he recognized the fundamental importance of free speech and the rights-violating nature and grave danger of censorship, then he was morally justified in violating it.

We are not talking here about the right to smoke pot or to drive without a seat belt or to sell beer on Sunday. We are talking about the right to freedom of speech—the one right that stands between human beings in a state of civilization and human beings in a state of war against or enslavement to a rogue government. We are talking about the right whose recognition and protection constitutes the essential difference between the United States and North Korea. We’re talking about the last leg of a free (or semi-free) society.

We’re talking about that right.

Likewise, we are not talking about a trial in which the defendants are alleged to have stolen a car or defrauded someone or refused to bake a cake. We’re talking about a trial in which the defendants are alleged to have repeatedly gang-raped eleven- to eighteen-year-old girls for years on end—while English politicians, police, social workers, and journalists ignored or covered up the atrocities.

Because the horrors involved are nearly impossible to imagine, and because the nature and extent of the horrors justify the urgency with which Robinson has acted, let’s put some examples on the table to help us understand the situation. And because Robinson’s reasons for reporting on this particular trial include the fact that the UK government has tried for decades—and continues trying—to sweep the nationwide, Islam-inspired, child-rape epidemic under the rug, we’ll cite examples indicating that broader context.

The current trial in Leeds concerns just one of many (alleged) child-rape gangs (which the Brits euphemistically call “grooming gangs”) that consist mostly of Muslim men and that have been destroying young girls’ lives throughout England for decades.

As The Telegraph reports, in Rochdale several years ago, as many as fifty children were “passed around” and raped by a gang of Muslim men (euphemistically referred to as “Asians”).

One 13 year-old victim became pregnant and had the child aborted while another was forced to have sex with 20 men in one night. . . . [Another girl, aged fifteen] told police that she had been raped and provided DNA evidence from her attacker, however the CPS [Crown Prosecution Service] twice decided not to prosecute him. The 15 year-old’s abuse continued and at its height she was being driven to flats and houses to be raped by up to five men a night, four or five days a week.5

As reported by the BBC, in Oxfordshire, girls aged between eleven and fifteen “were drugged and suffered sadistic abuse.”

[V]ictims were plied with alcohol and drugs before being forced to perform sex acts. . . . [G]irls were tied up, burnt, suffocated, bitten, scratched and urinated upon. . . . [M]ost of the victims chose to take vast quantities of hard drugs to deaden their senses, particularly when they knew they were being hired out to a large group of men for gang abuse sessions that could go on for days.6

Douglas Murray elaborates:

The barbarism, which was carried out by local men of what is erroneously described as “Asian” origin, included branding one of the girls with an “M” on her body. The abuser’s name was “Mohammed” and the Mohammed in question wanted people to know that this girl “belonged” to him and as such was his property. . . .

[O]ne of the girls was drugged and raped by a gang of men. She managed to escape and hail a taxi which drove her to the care home she lived in. Staff at the care home refused to pay the taxi fare, so the taxi driver took the girl straight back to the property from which she had just escaped, where the gang then raped her again. . . .

Families of some of the abused girls related that they had tried consistently to raise the alarm over what was happening to their daughters but that every door of the state was closed in their faces.7

In Rotherham, as Helen Raleigh reports,

gangs have groomed, raped, beaten, and trafficked more than 1,500 victims, including 1,300 females (some were as young as 11 years old) for nearly two decades. The type of abuse seen in Rotherham only makes up a fraction of sexual exploitation in the U.K. More than 700 women and girls have been identified as potential victims of sexual exploitation by similar grooming gangs in New Castle in the North East U.K.8

Again, that’s just an indication. This nightmare has haunted and violated young girls for decades throughout England—from Leeds to Oxford to Canterbury, Liverpool, Manchester, Aylesbury, Bristol, Dewsbury, Keighley, London, Newcastle, Rochdale, Rotherham, Telford, and beyond.

What is worse is that politicians, police, social workers, and journalists have swept the atrocity under the rug. Why? Because they are afraid of being called “racist” (as if Islam were a race, and as if educated Brits couldn’t defend the fact that Islam is not a race but a religion if they put their Eton- and Oxford-trained minds to it).

In regard to the aforementioned child-raping Muslims in Rochdale, a former Labour MP for Keighley, Ann Cryer, explains that social workers and police ignored the crimes because they didn’t want to be accused of racism: “This is an absolute scandal. They were petrified of being called racist and so reverted to the default of political correctness. They had a greater fear of being perceived in that light than in dealing with the issues in front of them.”9

Maajid Nawaz (a self-described Muslim Brit) elaborates:

For too long in this country, we media—the establishment, society, the chattering classes, the liberal elite, whatever term you want to use—have ignored the issue of grooming gangs and of young, vulnerable teenage girls, who have been victimized, drugged, raped, and abused. . . .

Both the prosecutor in the Rotherham case, British Pakistani Muslim Nazir Afzal, and indeed the official inquiry into why it took so long for these young, vulnerable, underage girls to get justice—both concluded that fears of racism prevented us from coming to the defense of vulnerable underage girls.

“Fears of racism”—meaning that the state was scared that it would be accused of being racist if it rightly arrested and prosecuted British Pakistani—largely British Pakistani Muslim—men in their abuse of underage white teenage girls. And so, from fear of appearing racist, there was silence across the country—as multiple cases of grooming gangs [i.e., rape gangs] emerged up and down the country. . . .

If we hadn’t all been silent—if we had all addressed this issue head-on when it needed to be addressed, when it was time to address it—then the void would not have emerged for populist agitators to fill that gap. . . .10

[This] should have been the concern of every right-minded citizen in this country. Unfortunately, it takes a bit of courage to address something that people will hurl abuse at you for talking about. I know. On this show—on my own show, on the weekends—I’ve tried to book certain MPs to come on and address the issue of grooming gangs. And multiple times, they’ve had to back away for fear of the backlash. . . .

I just wish that those young girls had seen justice served for them as fast as the judge served Tommy Robinson. . . . It’s very easy for us to pick on “the bogeyman.” But, actually, the truth is that our silence over decades in this country is the real bogeyman.

That’s the real thing we should despise—our own cowardice . . . our conspiracy of silence.11

Whatever flaws Tommy Robinson may have—and my research reveals remarkably few—he has been trying to shed light on this atrocity, while the English “chattering classes” and “liberal elites” have opted instead to ensure that they are not called “racist.”

Douglas Murray points out that this cowardice is not limited to the establishment in England. It is rampant throughout the West:

Most of the press in free Western countries are cowards . . . most of our artistic establishment are cowards . . . most of our politicians are cowards. . . . [I]ndustries that spend much of their year in award ceremonies patting themselves and each other on the back for their bravery, stop when an actual act of bravery may be required. . . . [T]he entire liberal class of artists and writers and thinkers stop just at the point where bravery is needed.12

Tommy Robinson is not a coward. He speaks the truth about Islam, about Muslim child-rape gangs, about young girls who have been abused by sub-animals motivated by “the religion of peace,” and about cowards who refuse to acknowledge, much less stop, this life-destroying abomination.

For this, Robinson has been jailed for thirteen months, during which time he quite possibly will be murdered by Muslim inmates. (Reportedly, when jailed for an unrelated charge, Robinson was assaulted by eight Muslims who brutalized him and knocked out all his front teeth. According to The Spectator, “The only reason he didn’t die, he says, is because they didn’t have any ‘shivs’ [bladed weapons]).”13

One common refrain of alleged “justification” for the government’s silencing of Robinson is that the trial is being conducted in three parts, that the second part was just concluding when he was livestreaming outside the courthouse, and that his reporting on the trial could prejudice the jury and thus cause an unfair trial or even a mistrial.

This claim does not withstand scrutiny.

For one thing, as Brian Doherty points out,

jurors can be instructed, as they generally are in the U.S., to judge based on the evidence presented in court, not on something they heard some guy with a camera scream. Jurors apt to reach verdicts based on “but I heard a guy shouting in the hall he was guilty” have problems no amount of secret and draconian speech restrictions can solve.14

Some people (and British law) apparently regard jurors as incapable of following such elementary instructions—instructions that jurors in other Western countries follow every day.

But the claim that Robinson’s reporting could prejudice the jury is even more ridiculous than Doherty implies. In the livestream video for which Robinson was arrested, he doesn’t say anything about the defendants being guilty. He discusses the widespread problem of child rape at the hands of Muslims throughout England, reads names of and charges against some of the defendants in this particular case, asks the defendants (as they arrive at the courthouse) how they feel about their verdict, and notes that they have their prison bags in hand. None of this can reasonably be regarded as potentially “prejudicing” the trial.

Further, although under British law a trial is regarded as “active” and thus under reporting restrictions as soon as a suspect is arrested, many other British citizens and journalists who have reported on “active” trials by filming defendants arriving at the courthouse, naming the defendants, and asking them questions have not been arrested for breaching the peace or jailed for contempt of court or accused of prejudicing the trial.15

For instance, below are pictures of Max Clifford and Rolf Harris entering or exiting the courthouse for their respective sexual misconduct trials in England. Observe that reporters are all over the place—right there on court property—operating cameras, video cameras, and microphones. These reporters were not arrested, and no one claimed that their reporting would render a prejudiced jury, an unfair trial, or a mistrial.


Rolf Harris leaving Southwark Crown Court. Photograph: Neil Hall/Reuters (fair use).


Max Clifford arriving at Southwark Crown Court. Photograph: Roland Hoskins (fair use).

Even more revealing, however, are a series of video clips (see below) that Ezra Levant put together, showing other British citizens and reporters, one year earlier, filming the same defendants whom Robinson filmed, from the same trial, with the same judge, going into the same courthouse. In their commentary, some of these citizens and reporters do not refer to the defendants as “alleged offenders” or “alleged perpetrators” as Robinson did. Instead, they refer to the defendants as “rapists.” Some of these commentators are not filming and reporting from the street, as Robinson was, but are filming and reporting while standing on court property—in some cases at the courthouse door. Some are not speaking with calm voices and asking journalistically appropriate questions, as Robinson did (e.g., “How are you feeling about your verdict?”), but rather are screaming at the defendants, calling them “pedophile!” and “child rapist!” as they enter the courthouse. Some of these (non-Robinson) reporters are not using a small camera or cell phone to video the defendants, but rather are using full-blown, large, mainstream-media TV cameras on tripods and large, bright-colored microphones. Were any of them arrested for breaching the peace or contempt of court or even accused of prejudicing the trial? They were not.

Before we get to Levant’s compilation video, I want to emphasize, as he does, that the point of showing these clips is not to imply that these other citizens or journalists should be arrested for “breaching the peace” or “contempt of court” or the like. The point is not that everyone who reports on these trials should be silenced. The point is that no one should be silenced—and that there is a clear-as-day double standard when it comes to Robinson. Watch the video, or even just a few minutes of it, and you’ll see.16 (Then be sure to continue reading below, as the most important points are yet to come.)
LIVE with Ezra: SHOCK VIDEO shows other journalists filming same trial as Tommy Robinson
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=350&v=w0B6FWyiQWI


As you can see, not only have various other citizens and journalists done what Robinson allegedly was arrested and jailed for doing, but many have done it without the care Robinson exercised to remain calm, to stay off court property, and to uphold the presumption of innocence until proven guilty.

But the double standard gets even clearer.

On May 11, 2017, more than a year before Robinson’s recent arrest and imprisonment, The Sun, one of the UK’s largest, most widely read media outlets, published an article about the Leeds child-rape trial.17 The article includes a full list of the twenty-nine defendants and the charges against each, as well as fourteen pictures of defendants being escorted into the courthouse and of citizens and reporters on court property photographing, filming, and questioning the defendants as they arrived and entered. (Other British media published similar articles with full lists of the defendants’ names, charges, and pictures, too.)18 Here’s how The Sun reported their names and charges:

WHO’S CHARGED? THE FULL LIST OF 29 DEFENDANTS

The first group are set to go on trial on January 8 next year.

Amere Singh Dhaliwal, 34, from Huddersfield, West Yorks., is accused of 54 charges, including 21 charges of rape and 14 charges of trafficking with a view of sexual exploitation.

Dhaliwal is accused of charges against eleven different girls from 2004 to 2011.

Irfan Ahmed, 32, from Huddersfield, West Yorks., was charged with nine offences including making an indecent image of a child.

Zahid Hassan, 28, from Huddersfield, West Yorks., was charged with 20 offences including six charges of raping a girl aged 13 or under.

Mohammed Kammer, 32, from Huddersfield, West Yorks., was charged with two offences including rape of a girl under 15.

Mohammed Aslam, 29, from Huddersfield, West Yorks., was charged with two offences including rape of a girl under 15.

Abdul Rehman, 30, from Sheffield, South Yorks., was charged with seven offences including raping a girl under 15.

Raj Singh Barsran, 32, from Huddersfield, West Yorks., was charged with three offences including sexual touching of a girl over 13.

Nahman Mohammed, 31 from Huddersfield, West Yorks., was charged with three counts including trafficking a person for sexual exploitation.

Zubair Ahmed, 30, from Huddersfield, West Yorks., was charged with two offences including raping a girl under the age 15.

Hamzha Saleem, 37, from Old traddford, Gtr Mancs., was charged with three counts including human trafficking.

The second group are set to stand trial on April 16 2018. The trial is provisionally set to last for six weeks.

Mansoor Akhtar, 25, from Huddersfield, West Yorks., was charged with three offences including attempted rape of a girl under the age of 13.

Mohammed Asaf Akram, 31, from Huddersfield, West Yorks., was charged with 14 offences including four charges of raping a girl of thirteen or under and one charge of threatening to kill.

Wiqas Mahmud, 36 from Huddersfield, West Yorks., was charged with three offences of rape of a girl under 15.

Nasarat Hussain, 28, from Huddersfield, West Yorks., was charged with five offences including rape of a girl under 15.

Sajid Hussain, 32, from Huddersfield, West Yorks., was charged with five offences including rape of a girl under 15.

Mohammed Irfraz, 28, from Huddersfield, West Yorks., was charged with eight offences including false imprisonment.

Faisal Nadeem, 30 from Huddersfield, West Yorks., was charged with three counts including raping a woman 16 or over.

Mohammed Azeem, 31, from Bradford, West Yorks., was charged with three offences including rape of a girl under 15.

Zulquarnian Dogar, 29, from Huddersfield, West Yorks., was charged with two offences including sexual touching of a female aged 13 or over.

Manzoor Hassan, 37, from Huddersfield, West Yorks., was charged with four offences including inciting the sexual exploitation of a child aged between 13-17.

The third group are set to face trial on 3 September 2018. The trial is set to last for six weeks.

Niaz Ahmed, 53, from Huddersfield, West Yorks., was charged with three offences including sexual assault on a female.

Mohammed Imran Ibrar, 32, from Huddersfield, West Yorks., was charged with four offences including arranging the commission of a child sex offence.

Asif Bashir, 32, from Huddersfield, West Yorks., was charged with five offences, including three counts of raping a woman 16 or over.

Everton la Bastide, 50, from Huddersfield, West Yorks., was charged with two offences including sexual touching a girl of 13 or over.

Saqib Raheel, 30, from Dudley was charged with two offences including trafficking for sexual exploitation.

Usman Khalid, 29, from Huddersfield, West Yorks., was charged with three offences including assaulting a girl under 13.

Aleem Javaid, 27, from Huddersfield, West Yorks., was charged with two offences including supply of a class B drug.

Mrs Naveeda Habib, 38, from Huddersfield, West Yorks., was charged on one count of neglect of a child.

Mrs Shahnaz Malik, 55 from Huddersfield, West Yorks., was charged with one count of neglecting a child.

Were The Sun or its reporters charged with breaching the peace or contempt of court or prejudicing the trial? They were not.

But Tommy Robinson was.

We could go on, but the point is clear: The law was not applied objectively, equally, fairly. It was applied subjectively, unequally, unfairly. And the ease with which a judge can apply it this way is baked into the law by means of its utter vagueness.

As Brian Doherty relays,19 the NYU Law Review published an article showing that, in the relevant law, the UK’s Contempt of Court Act 1981, “both the definition of contempt and the extent of the public affairs exemption are unworkably vague.” Joanna Armstrong Brandwood, the author of the detailed critique, writes:

Wide discretion granted to authorities increases both the uncertainty for publishers and the dangers of selective enforcement. This has a chilling effect on free speech, and, not surprisingly, the amount of information published in Britain about the courts and criminal cases noticeably has declined since 1981. . . . From an American perspective, the British law of contempt unnecessarily and inadvisably restricts freedom of the press. While the media might interfere with criminal defendants’ fair trial rights, it also has an important role in securing those rights. According to the United States Supreme Court, a “responsible press has always been regarded as the handmaiden of effective judicial administration, especially in the criminal field.” The British law of contempt limits the effectiveness of the press as a guarantor of individual liberties, thereby potentially compromising the very values it seeks to protect.20

As Levant’s video and the other evidence provided above show, “the uncertainty for publishers and the dangers of selective enforcement” with respect to this law are on full and vivid display in the case of Tommy Robinson.

Importantly, however, the problem at hand is not merely one vague, non-objective British law. The problem is that various politicians, police, social workers, and journalists in the UK (and elsewhere) are hell-bent on silencing Robinson, who has exposed their cowardice, their coverups, and their complicity (via their silence) in, among other things, Islam-motivated mass child rape.

As Douglas Murray notes, “it is by now abundantly clear that every arm of the British state has been out to get Tommy Robinson from the moment he emerged on the scene in Luton a decade ago.”

The problem—as I said in 2015—is that any challenge Robinson presents is all a secondary issue. The primary issue is that for years the British state allowed gangs of men to rape thousands of young girls across Britain. For years the police, politicians, Crown Prosecution Service, and every other arm of the state ostensibly dedicated to protecting these girls failed them. As a number of government inquires [sic] have concluded, they turned their face away from these girls because they were terrified of the accusations of racism that would come their way if they did address them. They decided it wasn’t worth the aggravation.

By contrast, Tommy Robinson thought it was worth the aggravation, even if that meant having his whole life turned upside down.21

All evidence points to the fact that the British government has targeted Robinson because he is critical of Islam and of the government’s penchant for turning a blind eye to atrocities committed by Muslims.

Whatever anyone thinks or feels about Robinson’s views is irrelevant here. (For the record, I regard him as mostly correct and truly heroic.) Robinson, like everyone else, has a moral right to express his views so long as his doing so does not involve incitement to violence or some other form of (genuine) rights violation.22

If Robinson broke a rights-violating British law by expressing his views, then that “problem” is the moral fault of the rights-violating law and of the people who support it. In no case is the irrationality, inefficacy, or incompetence of the British legal system a legitimate excuse for violating anyone’s right to freedom of speech. The only moral purpose of government is to protect rights—and the one right that separates a semi-civilized society from a wholly uncivilized society is the right to freedom of speech. This right can never justly be violated.

Just as we cannot save the free market system by abandoning free market principles (à la George W. Bush), so, too, we cannot protect the principle of individual rights by abandoning that principle.

Tommy Robinson morally must be freed. Immediately. And everyone who understands the importance of individual rights, freedom of speech, and objective law morally must demand it.

Islamic Preacher Arrives in UK With Police Escort
Paul Joseph Watson
Published on 13 Feb 2015
This strange video shows an Islamic preacher being escorted by British police through Birmingham airport, while his followers greet his arrival with rhythmic chanting.
Weird Video: Islamic Preacher Arrives in UK With Police Escort
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZQGfDkuU42w&feature=youtu.be

Watch: Muslims go crazy as a British woman preaches against Islam in public
https://www.freespeechtime.net/2018/04/watch-muslims-go-crazy-as-british-woman.html
A courageous British woman took to the streets to protest against Sharia law and against rape gangs in Britain, "Liberal elite does not care when Islamists rap our kids!" 
According to sharia laws: 
– There is no freedom of religion or freedom of speech. 
– There is no equality between people (the non-Muslim is not equal to the Muslim). 
– There are no equal rights for men and women. 
– There is no democracy or a separation between religion and state politics. 
Sharia is incompatible with Western values. 
The Western world must close its borders, deport illegal immigrants, and ban the Sharia laws.



London:The situation is becoming every day more and more dangerous. 
London has overtaken New York City for number of murders for the first time in over 200 years under the mayoralty of Labour’s Sadiq Khan. 
According to British media, London is now more dangerous than New York City. According to crime statistics, crime across the U.K. was up 13%, with much of it in London. 
Rape, robbery, Acid attacks, honor killings and violent offenses have surged dramatically. 
Shari'a honor killing is very common in the Muslim world, but it also happens in the West, there are 12 honour killings in the UK each year. 
Figures like these have risen in many European countries, with Sweden becoming “Europe’s rape capital,” Germany’s steep rise in violent and crimes, and Paris’s frequent terror attacks. Is this what multiculturalism looks like? 

Liberals and leftists in the West use the made up term "Islamophobia" to portray anyone who criticizes Islam as a "racist". 
Radical Muslim terrorists all over the world carry out terror attacks "in the name of Allah".
They justify their violence by quoting verses from the Quran. 
Islamophobia is a made up word created by the Muslim Brotherhood specifically to silence debate. 
Liberals and leftists ignore the fact that Islam is an ideology that has nothing to do with race. 
Islamophobia is a neologism created to silence any possible debate about the problems Islamic extremism has got with modernity, with the intention of using the collective post-colonial "guilt" to exempt a particular set of beliefs from scrutiny, analysis and criticism. 
It's a buzzword used in an attempt to silence anyone, whenever had legit questions or criticisms about the religion. 
Islam is not a race. It's a religion.
There is an attempt in the West to impose a sharia-blasphemy law to criminalize criticism of Islam. 
It started when Saudi Arabia and Muslim countries tried to pass a UN resolution to force Western states to criminalize criticism of Islam. 
The Parliament in Canada passed "Motion M-103" to condemn the so-called "Islamophobia (Fear of Islam)" in a preparation for a blasphemy law in Canada. 
According to the sharia blasphemy law anyone who criticizes Islam or the Prophet Muhammad should be killed. 
Under Sharia blasphemy law in Saudi Arabia and Iran Muslims are executed if they are accused of blasphemy. 
In Pakistan, the situation is even worse, radical Muslims use the blasphemy law to persecute the Christian minority. 
Is this the law the liberals in the West want to adopt? 
If you think Sharia blasphemy law has no place in the West, share this post!

Watch: Muslims go crazy as a British woman preaches against Islam in public
https://www.freespeechtime.net/2018/04/watch-muslims-go-crazy-as-british-woman.html
A courageous British woman took to the streets to protest against Sharia law and against rape gangs in Britain, "Liberal elite does not care when Islamists rap our kids!" 
According to sharia laws: 
– There is no freedom of religion or freedom of speech. 
– There is no equality between people (the non-Muslim is not equal to the Muslim). 
– There are no equal rights for men and women. 
– There is no democracy or a separation between religion and state politics. 
Sharia is incompatible with Western values. 
The Western world must close its borders, deport illegal immigrants, and ban the Sharia laws.

London:The situation is becoming every day more and more dangerous. 
London has overtaken New York City for number of murders for the first time in over 200 years under the mayoralty of Labour’s Sadiq Khan. 
According to British media, London is now more dangerous than New York City. According to crime statistics, crime across the U.K. was up 13%, with much of it in London. 
Rape, robbery, Acid attacks, honor killings and violent offenses have surged dramatically. 
Shari'a honor killing is very common in the Muslim world, but it also happens in the West, there are 12 honour killings in the UK each year. 
Figures like these have risen in many European countries, with Sweden becoming “Europe’s rape capital,” Germany’s steep rise in violent and crimes, and Paris’s frequent terror attacks. Is this what multiculturalism looks like? 

Liberals and leftists in the West use the made up term "Islamophobia" to portray anyone who criticizes Islam as a "racist". 
Radical Muslim terrorists all over the world carry out terror attacks "in the name of Allah".
They justify their violence by quoting verses from the Quran. 
Islamophobia is a made up word created by the Muslim Brotherhood specifically to silence debate. 
Liberals and leftists ignore the fact that Islam is an ideology that has nothing to do with race. 
Islamophobia is a neologism created to silence any possible debate about the problems Islamic extremism has got with modernity, with the intention of using the collective post-colonial "guilt" to exempt a particular set of beliefs from scrutiny, analysis and criticism. 
It's a buzzword used in an attempt to silence anyone, whenever had legit questions or criticisms about the religion. 
Islam is not a race. It's a religion.
There is an attempt in the West to impose a sharia-blasphemy law to criminalize criticism of Islam. 
It started when Saudi Arabia and Muslim countries tried to pass a UN resolution to force Western states to criminalize criticism of Islam. 
The Parliament in Canada passed "Motion M-103" to condemn the so-called "Islamophobia (Fear of Islam)" in a preparation for a blasphemy law in Canada. 
According to the sharia blasphemy law anyone who criticizes Islam or the Prophet Muhammad should be killed. 
Under Sharia blasphemy law in Saudi Arabia and Iran Muslims are executed if they are accused of blasphemy. 
In Pakistan, the situation is even worse, radical Muslims use the blasphemy law to persecute the Christian minority. 
Is this the law the liberals in the West want to adopt? 
If you think Sharia blasphemy law has no place in the West, share this post!

Man thrown out after confronting London Muslim mayor over his right to criticize Islam
Facebook 18.1k      
https://www.freespeechtime.net/2018/05/man-thrown-out-after-comforting-london.html
Malaysian man asks Sadiq Khan interesting questions. Gets thrown out. 
There is an attempt in the West to impose a sharia-blasphemy law to criminalize criticism of Islam. 
According to the sharia blasphemy law anyone who criticizes Islam or the Prophet Muhammad should be killed. 
In Pakistan, radical Muslims use the blasphemy law to persecute the Christian minority. 
If you think Sharia blasphemy law has no place in the West, share this post!

Liberals and leftists in the West use the made up term "Islamophobia" to portray anyone who criticizes Islam as a "racist". 
Radical Muslim terrorists all over the world carry out terror attacks "in the name of Allah". 
They justify their violence by quoting verses from the Quran. 
Islamophobia is a made up word created by the Muslim Brotherhood specifically to silence debate. 
Liberals and leftists ignore the fact that Islam is an ideology that has nothing to do with race. 
Islamophobia is a neologism created to silence any possible debate about the problems Islamic extremism has got with modernity, with the intention of using the collective post-colonial "guilt" to exempt a particular set of beliefs from scrutiny, analysis and criticism. 
It's a buzzword used in an attempt to silence anyone, whenever had legit questions or criticisms about the religion. 
Islam is not a race. It's a religion.
There is an attempt in the West to impose a sharia-blasphemy law to criminalize criticism of Islam. 
It started when Saudi Arabia and Muslim countries tried to pass a UN resolution to force Western states to criminalize criticism of Islam. 
The Parliament in Canada passed "Motion M-103" to condemn the so-called "Islamophobia (Fear of Islam)" in a preparation for a blasphemy law in Canada. 
According to the sharia blasphemy law anyone who criticizes Islam or the Prophet Muhammad should be killed. 
Under Sharia blasphemy law in Saudi Arabia and Iran Muslims are executed if they are accused of blasphemy. 
In Pakistan, the situation is even worse, radical Muslims use the blasphemy law to persecute the Christian minority. 
Is this the law the liberals in the West want to adopt? 
If you think Sharia blasphemy law has no place in the West, share this post!

https://voiceofeurope.com/2017/10/tommy-robinson-interview-the-elite-are-clearly-in-the-process-of-islamizing-the-west/

Tommy Robinson interview: ‘The elite are clearly in the process of Islamizing the West.’
 By VOICE OF EUROPE  17 October 2017

Tommy Robinson is a journalist for The Rebel Media and the author of an autobiography, called “Enemy of the State”. We interview him about his new book: “Mohammed’s Koran: Why Muslims Kill For Islam”, co-authored by Peter McLoughlin.
 
VoE: Your social media accounts have exploded, you’ve became a reporter for the Rebel and you have a family: where did you find the time to write a book?

Robinson: As you probably know, the British state stitched me up and sent me to prison. Confined to a cell (in conditions in which they wouldn’t have put a Muslim terrorist) gave me plenty of time to read the Koran. But before that, in the early days of the English Defence League, we had many well-informed apostates telling us the ins and outs of Islam. And Peter is a good researcher and an imaginative thinker, so between the two of us we managed to come up with a revolutionary way to explain the Koran to ordinary people. My wife and kids don’t get nearly enough time with me, but I try to juggle many different demands. My book “Enemy of the State” shows just how hard it is for me to live a normal family life.

We ended up producing a truly revolutionary approach to the Koran.
VoE: What was your motivation to write this book?

Robinson: We could see that there were dozens and dozens of really great books on Islam around, so for years it seemed to us that there was no angle that others had missed. But as we looked back on many years of debates which failed to explain what was going on with Islam and terrorism, we realised that the key intervention was to focus on the Koran. In debate Muslims would claim they rejected the barbarities found in books on Sharia law or the hadiths. But they would never reject what was found in the Koran. Because the Koran was turgid, verbose and shapeless (Winston Churchill’s words), Muslims and their quisling allies could find some passage that seemed to reject violence, and in this way they could deceive the public in debate. Debates on why Muslims killed for Islam would just go round in circles, with politicians, academics, clergy and journalists doing nothing to help the public grasp this civilizational threat. So what was needed was to prove that any such supposedly peaceful verses were cancelled by later violent commands from “Allah”.


Tommy Robinson / Facebook

But now we were looking at trying to get the public to understand Koranic scholarship, which is a tall order (even we’d rather we never had to learn anything about Koranic scholarship). We knew it was a matter of life and death for us to get through to the very people who would have the least interest in this boring subject. We concluded that it all came down to presentation – the only way this would work is if we got the presentation right. We knew ourselves how confusing it was to look at tables cross-comparing the standard order of Koranic verses with tables where the verses were put in chronological order. We also knew that books on abrogation were few and far between, and even then the key text on this subject was in itself challenging to understand when someone managed to find it.

So, we knew we had to take what was an accepted, mainstream translation of the Koran and present the proper chronology and all the instances of abrogation in the clearest possible way. And we had to pull out from the thousands of verses those verses which are of most importance to non-Muslims. Finally, we decided to highlight just how obsessed Islam is with unbelief and unbelievers. We ended up producing a truly revolutionary approach to the Koran. Whilst there have been chronological Korans before (as we prove in the Introduction, these books became concealed as the West started to import Islam). No scholar has ever put the final words of Mohammed first, no scholar has ever crossed-out all the abrogated verses. Within five minutes of looking at this Koran the ordinary citizen can see that why Muslims find the Koran an inspiration for terrorists. Anyone who is given some “peaceful” verse from the Koran can look it up in our book and see immediately if all or even part of that verse has been cancelled by later commands to violence.

As George Orwell says in his book 1984, if there’s any hope it will come from the working class.
VoE: Do you think this book can change anything (and why)?

Robinson: As George Orwell says in his book 1984, if there’s any hope it will come from the working class. Many people think the problem is that politicians and journalists are ignorant about the doctrines and history of Islam. We needed to prove that it was not possible for people to be ignorant who have hundreds of staff and the best education that money can buy. We could see that all the evidence showed that for more than 150 years the educated elite have known what Islam is. We could also see that their only response to jihadi terrorism was to give our countries more Islam. So we wanted a book that would speak to the ordinary voter, proving in the strongest possible way what Islam is and making ordinary people realise they cannot leave this problem to the elite to sort out – because all the evidence shows the elite are clearly in the process of Islamizing the West.
We did test runs before the book was published, where it would be given out in batches in ordinary towns, and then key people would feed back to us how the public reacted to the book. Based on that information, the book was adapted to try and make it appeal to the widest possible readership. But even more importantly, we were told months later that these books were still circulating in these towns, with ordinary people actively seeking out a copy of this book on the Koran. Even before the book went on sale this gave us hope that the presentation worked.


Tommy Robinson / Facebook

That Introduction to Mohammed’s Koran exists to prove to the ordinary citizen that the elite are on the side of Islam not on the side of non-Muslims. These quislings in power in the UK, Germany, France, etc. won’t be removed from power until most of an electorate is left in no doubt that the jihadis are the shock troops of Islam, and that what Muslims are doing is what Islam has always done. The front cover of Mohammed’s Koran bears a verse from the Koran explaining why the jihadis are the shock troops. The back cover of the book bears a verse from the Koran explaining why the behaviour of “moderate Muslims” is also part of the battle plan of Islam. The entire ideology of Islam is rotten to the core, and like national socialism and communism it has to be exposed for what it is, before it is too late. Our book was designed to be a taken down to the pub to be discussed among friends. If ordinary people don’t look out for the future of their children and grandchildren the politicians absolutely will not.

The first print run of Mohammed’s Koran went straight to No.1 at Amazon and stayed there until it sold out just 4 days later. It is probably unheard of in the publishing industry for a book on theology to go to No.1 like that. But even though it is my second best-seller, the quisling media did not even report this. So the public’s response to the book gives us hope. Weeks since it was launched, with no PR campaign and no advertising, this book on Koranic scholarship is still in the top 100 books. The public want to understand why every time Muslims kill our people for Islam, our politicians go on TV to lie to us that “Islam is a religion of peace”. That contradiction has not escaped the public’s notice.

All the indicators are that children born now in Western countries will live out their days under the rule of Muslims.
VoE: How do you look at the future of the UK and Europe?

Robinson: The future is bleak unless we can wake up the masses. Already in 2004 and 2006 Professor Lewis — the West’s 20th century expert on Islam — was predicting (probably with a heavy heart) that by the end of this century the whole of Europe will have fallen to Islam. There are many books pointing out that demography is destiny, but even if these books did not exist it’s twenty years since the UN published their plans for “replacement migration” in the West. All the indicators are that children born now in Western countries will live out their days under the rule of Muslims.


MikeDotta / Shutterstock.com

We have no more than a couple of decades to bring about a democratic revolution and remove these quisling elites from power. If we don’t use what limited freedom of speech and limited democracy we have to remove them, then we shouldn’t complain when Muslims do come to power and impose Sharia law on us, as professor Lewis predicted. If we fail to speak out and fail to use our votes, then Europe will probably descend into civil war as Muslims increase their violent assault on our freedoms. Already the senior politicians in countries such as France have warned of a coming civil war. That France has been under a state of emergency for years, shows that we are already in the early stages of this civil war. We now see that the globalist corporations (Google, Facebook, Twitter, etc.) are willingly implementing policies imposing political correctness and restricting freedom of speech. The alliance of big business and governments to restrict freedom of speech to control populations is the very essence of Fascism.

VoE: Any ideas about a next book?

Robinson: We’re kicking round other ideas of ways to wake up the general public. This book isn’t the last shout. We’re looking at subjects that will demonstrate how governments will sacrifice their citizens to Islam. Something along the lines of what Peter did with “Easy Meat”, his book on the 30 year cover-up by the British state of Muslim gangs who rape and prostitute English schoolgirls on an industrial scale.

VoE: Where can people buy your book?

Robinson: Mohammed’s Koran is available at Amazon sites, where there are many great reviews of the book (within three weeks of the book being available to buy, Amazon’s UK site contained hundreds of 5 star reviews).

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Mohammeds-Koran-Muslims-Kill-Islam/dp/0995584907

https://www.amazon.com/Mohammeds-Koran-Muslims-Kill-Islam/dp/0995584907

But the book is also available at Amazon’s Indian, German, French, etc. sites. People can just search using the words “Mohammed’s Koran” and they should find links where they can buy the book.

Soon there will be a website online with a huge amount of supplementary material related to the book. We are determined to make sure that the Western world understands what Islam is like, just as 50 years ago people in the West knew what Islam was like. Sadly we don’t have 50 years in which to undo the deliberate deception of the public.

INTERVIEW TOMMY ROBINSON UK