JUST IN: Governor of Guam Rises Up, Issues Shocking Trump Message

https://www.christiannewsalerts.com/gov-of-guam-issues-message/?utm_medium=push&utm_source=AP&utm_campaign=onesignal
JUST IN: Governor of Guam Rises Up, Issues Shocking Trump Message
August 11, 2017 Ben Baker
Democrats have been widely critical of Trump’s warnings to North Korea this week. Some have claimed that his rhetoric will do more to incite war than solve it and others believe Trump is simply bluffing.

But according to the Independent Journal Review, the governor of Guam, one of the potential target areas, said if any nation wants to attack Guam he wants a president who will say, “they will be met with hell and fury.” With this statement, Eddie Calvo, governor of Guam, conveyed what his people think, and how they stand with the president.

The leader of North Korea, Kim Jong-un, has been taking his hostility to an entirely new level since it was discovered he could potentially strike at the US with nuclear-tipped missiles.

On Wednesday, Kim even went so far as to claim he would attack the “waters near Guam by mid-August,” adding that Trump’s threats were nonsense and needed to be dealt with through “absolute force.”

Trump’s declaration came Tuesday when the potential capabilities of North Korea were revealed. As reported by the Independent Journal Review, Trump stated, “North Korea best not make any more threats to the United States. They will be met with fire and fury like the world has never seen. He [Kim Jong-un] has been very threatening beyond a normal statement. And as I said, they will be met with fire, fury, and frankly power, the likes of which this world has never seen before.”

Defense Secretary James Mattis reaffirmed the president’s statements, according to Fox News, saying “The DPRK should cease any consideration of actions that would lead to the end of its regime and the destruction of its people.”

While many have been supportive of the Trump administration’s efforts to show strength in the face of North Korea’s hostility while seeking to resolve it diplomatically, many Democrats have been critical of the rhetoric. Some have even attempted to undermine it.

According to Breitbart, Representative Maxine Waters (D-CA), described Trump’s words as nothing but a bluff. “I think there are some things that they want from us, and we have to find out whether or not we can work with them on the things that they’re asking for,” Waters demurred. “And so this is something we should be very concerned about. But this is not the time to go bluffing and threatening. This is a time for diplomacy.”

NBC News reported that Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer (D-NY) was similarly critical of Trump’s words “We need to be firm and deliberate with North Korea, but reckless rhetoric is not a strategy to keep America safe.”

It should be noted, however, that Guam’s Gov. Calvo, a man who among 160,000 others are living where North Korea reportedly intends to strike first, is supportive of Trump’s words.

After assuring the residents of Guam that proper contingencies were being taken in the event of a missile launch, he said of Trump, “As far as I’m concerned, as an American citizen, I want a president that says that if any nation such as North Korea attacks Guam, attacks Honolulu, attacks the West Coast, that they will be met with hell and fury.”

In the face of hostility, America needs to present a strong, united front while seeking to resolve the matter peacefully. It doesn’t help when Democrats seek to undermine and criticize our leader when another nation seeks to do us harm.

Well well well. New report suggests DNC was not hacked by the Russians but by …
http://conservativefighters.com/news/well-well-well-new-report-suggests-dnc-not-hacked-russians/
A new report from The Nation suggests the DNC hack was actually a leak, and not a hack from Russia.

There has been a long effort to counter the official narrative we now call “Russiagate.”

This effort has so far focused on the key events noted above, leaving numerous others still to be addressed. Until recently, researchers undertaking this work faced critical shortcomings, and these are to be explained. But they have achieved significant new momentum in the past several weeks, and what they have done now yields very consequential fruit.

Forensic investigators, intelligence analysts, system designers, program architects, and computer scientists of long experience and strongly credentialed are now producing evidence disproving the official version of key events last year.

Their work is intricate and continues at a kinetic pace as we speak. But its certain results so far are two, simply stated, and freighted with implications:

There was no hack of the Democratic National Committee’s system on July 5 last year—not by the Russians, not by anyone else. Hard science now demonstrates it was a leak—a download executed locally with a memory key or a similarly portable data-storage device. In short, it was an inside job by someone with access to the DNC’s system.

This casts serious doubt on the initial “hack,” as alleged, that led to the very consequential publication of a large store of documents on WikiLeaks last summer.

Forensic investigations of documents made public two weeks prior to the July 5 leak by the person or entity known as Guccifer 2.0 show that they were fraudulent: Before Guccifer posted them they were adulterated by cutting and pasting them into a blank template that had Russian as its default language.

Guccifer took responsibility on June 15 for an intrusion the DNC reported on June 14 and professed to be a WikiLeaks source—claims essential to the official narrative implicating Russia in what was soon cast as an extensive hacking operation. To put the point simply, forensic science now devastates this narrative.