If Hillary Goes Down So Will Obama

https://www.patriotnewsalerts.com/hillary-clinton-election-tough/
Hillary Clinton warns 2020 election will be ‘tough’ for Democrats
December 20, 2019 by Ben Marquis
Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton made a shocking prediction in a recent interview.

The twice-failed presidential candidate said in a recently published podcast that the 2020 election would be particularly “tough” for Democrats and could even be “complicated” by the impeachment of President Donald Trump, Fox News reported Thursday.

An interview in London
Clinton’s remarks came during a discussion with former Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard during a “World Questions” event at King’s College London in mid-November. The conversation between the two women was recently released on Gillard’s personal podcast — and what Clinton had to say about the upcoming 2020 election has sparked renewed attention to the month-old interview.

The former first lady’s prediction of a “tough” election in 2020 was centered on the fact that the country is currently so divided politically. That polarization is made even “more complicated” by the impeachment of President Trump in an election year, which will only serve to harden the president’s base of support, Clinton says.

“I think that it’s going to be a very tough election, as they seem to be these days, probably closer than one would like or expect,” Clinton told Gillard, according to The Washington Times. “In part, because we are so divided.”

She went on: “I mean, we are really a divided nation, and our partisanship stands for many other things. It stands for acceptance or rejection of all kinds of cultural changes. It stands for divides between urban and rural, between fast-growing, knowledge-based economies and stagnant, agriculture, and manufacturing-based economies.”

With regard to the current crop of Democrat candidates vying for the party’s nomination in 2020, Clinton said: “It’s all pretty bunched up in the top four or five people.”

Clinton’s same old excuses
As is typical for any interview involving Clinton, she also delved into how “devastated” she was following the 2016 election and how much of a “shock” the end result was to her, the Times reported.

“I can’t even describe to you how it made no sense. It’s why I wrote a book called ‘What Happened,’ because I was trying to figure out what happened,” she explained.

Fox noted that Clinton did admit to having made mistakes in her failed campaign, but as usual, she also cast blame upon “unprecedented interventions” such as Russian interference and public announcements by then-FBI Director James Comey, among other things.

Meanwhile, there has been plenty of speculation over whether Clinton is planning to make a late entry into the 2020 presidential race, and her constant interviews are only fueling the flames. And for her part, the former secretary of State has failed to put the rumors to rest.

Could these comments suggest she’s thinking of throwing her hat in the ring? Only time will tell.

Hillary Clinton claims ’10-year-olds’ are hacking U.S. election system
October 24, 2019
Mgid
Hillary Clinton is showing herself to be a bit of a conspiracy nut in recent days. From claiming that 2020 Democratic presidential candidate Tulsi Gabbard is a “Russian asset” (a similar claim to one she made about Jill Stein) to her belief that President Donald Trump is somehow owned by the Russian President, Hillary is not inspiring a lot of confidence in her mental stability.

13x More Efficient Than Solar Panels? New Invention Takes U.s by Storm!
DIY Tricks
Ads by Revcontent
In fact, she seems to be going the opposite direction. Secretary Clinton now claims that, “10-year-olds are hacking our voting systems and the networks that connect them.”

But it gets worse. “Every, you know, every Hackathon that happens, you know, 10-year-olds are hacking our voting systems and the networks that connect them,” said Clinton.

There’s just one problem with Clinton’s assertion: it isn’t true.

USA Today reported on one 11-year-old who, in a hacking competition, hacked a replica presentation website (which did not actually change any voting results). It’s hard to imagine that Clinton does not know this.
.
It’s pretty clear that this is the basis of her accusation. And that makes it all the more clear that she is a fundamentally dishonest person. This is humiliating for her, and should end her career for good. But we know that it will not — the media will never fully hold her to account.

Hillary Clinton has no business being anywhere near the Oval Office. But if recent reports are true, she may be considering another run in 2020. Voters should be aware that she has no changed from her days of pathological lying and deceit. The Hillary Clinton of 2020 is back — and more dishonest than ever.

Read the full story here. https://www.dailywire.com/news/hillary-clinton-on-a-conspiracy-roll-claims-10-year-olds-are-hacking-our-voting-systems

US strategist hired by Netanyahu’s rival told Hillary not to talk about Israel
 July 11, 2019
US strategist hired by Netanyahu’s rival told Hillary not to talk about IsraelThen-Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton speaks during a campaign rally in Raleigh, N.C., Nov. 8, 2016. (AP /Gerry Broome)
   Email  Print 43 Comments
“Why would we call out Israel in public events now? The only voters elevating foreign policy at all are Republican primary voters,” said Benenson.
By World Israel News Staff 
Joel Benenson, the American strategist and pollster recently hired by Benny Gantz of the Blue and White party, Netanyahu’s main rival, warned Hillary Clinton, who he worked for during her 2016 U.S. presidential campaign, to limit her comments about Israel on the campaign trail.
Benenson’s advice to Clinton in the form of emails, were revealed by Wikileaks in October 2016. They have made headlines again this week with the announcement that Benenson will be joining Blue and White’s campaign ahead of the September election.
The email thread, dated May 17, 2015, deals with “talking points” for Clinton on the stump.
Campaign manager Robby Mook writes: “I’m with Joel [Benenson]. We shouldn’t have Israel at public events. Especially Democrat activists.”
Jake Sullivan, a senior policy adviser to Clinton, questions that logic, noting that Clinton had served as secretary of state and therefore foreign policy, presumably, should be considered a strong point for the candidate’s campaign.
But Benenson himself then counters: “Why would we call out Israel in public events now? The only voters elevating foreign policy at all are Republican primary voters. To me, we deal with this in stride when and if we are asked about foreign policy.”
Sullivan persists: “I think good to have Israel too.”
Mandy Grunwald, political consultant and media adviser for the Democratic Party, seems to then suggest that Israel would be a good subject for fundraisers, in other words, when Clinton is speaking to donors, but questions whether the Democratic presidential hopeful should be raising the issue of the State of Israel at “public events.”
The underlying logic of these comments appears to be that Clinton donors are more likely to be sympathetic to Israel than the broad base of Democratic voters.
MORE https://worldisraelnews.com/us-strategist-hired-by-gantz-told-hillary-not-to-talk-about-israel/?

https://israelunwired.com/the-video-that-proves-just-how-wrong-clinton-was/
The video that proves just how wrong Clinton was
video-clinton-email
Can you imagine what would have happened if Hillary Clinton ended up winning? It would have been a disaster if she got into power! Here is all the proof you need.

To what extent are Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama close? Are they close from the angle of ideology or pure political expediency? How did the strategy of the Obama administration in Iraq reshape the world?

In a nutshell, her policies led to the creation of ISIS, an Islamic caliphate in the heart of the Middle East. But more than that, it encouraged the Islamic radical militants around the world to raise their heads and commit acts of terror. The foreign policy strategy that Hillary Clinton led as Secretary of State in the Obama administration was basically one large failure.
Libya
Libya was led by Qaddafi for decades. It was a country that did not live freely. Qaddafi was resented by many. But since Ronald Reagan bombed Libya, they did not pose a danger to other countries. But, once the Clinton policy of allowing ISIS threats to spread in the Middle East continued to grow, Libya became a target. The United States did not intervene when Qaddafi was threatened by ISIS. Clinton didn’t even lift a finger when her Consulate called, desperately asking for better security measures. Ultimately, her inaction directly led to the deaths of several people in the Consulate. And, of course, she did not take responsibility. It was just “normal” for dangerous things to happen in dangerous places. But actually, a beefed up security move would have saved their lives. This was not a major conflagration. It was a minor part of the battle for Middle East stability. But, it was indicative of the failed foresight, failed planning, and poor execution of basic policy that Hillary led as Secretary of State. She was clearly angling for a presidential run more than she was busy running the foreign policy of the country.

We are all better off without Hillary in the lead of this country. She may have or may not have continued the Obama administration policies. We’ll never know. Things probably would have been even worse on certain levels.

https://hannity.com/media-room/breaking-now-new-strzok-page-emails-show-gaps-in-clinton-probe-special-treatment-for-hillarys-attorney/
Hillary’s Attorney
posted by Hannity Staff - 16 hours ago
Recently obtained emails exchanged between Peter Strzok and Lisa Page show the FBI aimed to accommodate requests from Hillary Clinton’s lawyers leading up to the 2016 race for the White House.

“Internal FBI emails released Monday show FBI officials in 2016 sought to ‘expeditiously’ accommodate a request for information from then-Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s lawyer, in what a conservative watchdog group claimed is evidence of ‘special treatment,’” reports Fox News.

“Judicial Watch – a group that routinely sues for government records – obtained and released 218 pages of emails between former FBI officials Peter Strzok and Lisa Page. Many of the emails have to do with the bureau’s investigation into whether Clinton improperly used a private email server as secretary of state to discuss classified information,” adds the article.

“The emails released Monday, meanwhile, show then-FBI General Counsel James Baker writing that he spoke with Clinton’s lawyer, David Kendall, in August 2016 and promised that the FBI would work to hand over a copy of the 302 from Clinton’s interview ‘expeditiously,’” writes Fox.

Clinton’s email probe was thrust again into the national spotlight last week when former Attorney General Loretta Lynch contradicted James Comey’s Congressional testimony regarding the investigation.

“So you do not believe you ever instructed him to call it a matter?” one lawmaker asked Lynch.

“I did not. I have never instructed a witness as to what to say specifically. Never have. Never will,” fired-back the former Attorney General.

Lynch’s comments directly refute Comey’s Congressional testimony.

QUESTION: And then you made a comment earlier about the Attorney General, previous AG [Lynch] asking you about the investigation on the Clinton emails, saying that you were asked not to call it an ‘Investigation’ anymore, but to call it a ‘Matter.’ And you said that confused you. Can you give us additional details on that?

COMEY: Well, it concerned me, because we were at the point where we refused to confirm the existence of an investigation –as we usually do– for months,. And it was getting to a place where that looked silly, because the campaigns were talking about interacting with the FBI in the course of our work.

The Clinton campaign at the time was using all kinds of euphemisms, ‘security review,’ ‘matter.’ Things like that.

For what was going on. We were getting to a place where the Attorney General and I were going to have to testify and talk publicly about it, and I wanted to know if she would authorize us to confirm we had an investigation. And she said yes, but don’t call it that, call it a ‘Matter.’ And I said why would I do that? And [Lynch] said just call it a ‘Matter.’

Read the full report at Fox News.

https://hannity.com/media-room/not-a-joke-hillary-clinton-says-no-one-in-the-united-states-of-america-is-above-the-law/
NOT A JOKE: Hillary Clinton Says No One in the United States of America is ‘Above the Law’
posted by Hannity Staff - 13 hours ago
Hillary Clinton posted her latest lecture to America on social media Monday; bizarrely asserting that nobody in the US is “above the law” months after avoiding prosecution for her mishandling of classified material on her private email server.

“I don’t know who needs to hear this, but the president is not above the law,” posted the twice-failed presidential candidate on Twitter.
Hillary Clinton

@HillaryClinton
 I don't know who needs to hear this, but the president is not above the law.

246K
5:59 PM - Jun 3, 2019
Twitter Ads info and privacy
87.9K people are talking about this
Clinton’s comments come days after a cyber defense firm confirmed the former Secretary of State will be a keynote speaker at their conference on network and digital security.

“We are pleased to announce that Former U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton will be a featured keynote at our #FireEyeSummit in October! Secretary Clinton will engage in an intimate Q&A keynote discussion with Kevin Mandia,” posted the group’s social media account.
FireEye

@FireEye
 We are pleased to announce that Former U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton will be a featured keynote at our #FireEyeSummit in October! Secretary Clinton will engage in an intimate Q&A keynote discussion with Kevin Mandia. 
>> Learn more at http://summit.fireeye.com  pic.twitter.com/l96yOkADLf
1:10 PM - May 30, 2019
Twitter Ads info and privacy
View image on Twitter
11.4K people are talking about this
Clinton’s email probe was thrust again into the national spotlight last week when former Attorney General Loretta Lynch contradicted James Comey’s Congressional testimony regarding the investigation.

“So you do not believe you ever instructed him to call it a matter?” one lawmaker asked Lynch.

“I did not. I have never instructed a witness as to what to say specifically. Never have. Never will,” fired-back the former Attorney General.

Lynch’s comments directly refute Comey’s Congressional testimony.

QUESTION: And then you made a comment earlier about the Attorney General, previous AG [Lynch] asking you about the investigation on the Clinton emails, saying that you were asked not to call it an ‘Investigation’ anymore, but to call it a ‘Matter.’ And you said that confused you. Can you give us additional details on that?

COMEY: Well, it concerned me, because we were at the point where we refused to confirm the existence of an investigation –as we usually do– for months,. And it was getting to a place where that looked silly, because the campaigns were talking about interacting with the FBI in the course of our work.

The Clinton campaign at the time was using all kinds of euphemisms, ‘security review,’ ‘matter.’ Things like that.

For what was going on. We were getting to a place where the Attorney General and I were going to have to testify and talk publicly about it, and I wanted to know if she would authorize us to confirm we had an investigation. And she said yes, but don’t call it that, call it a ‘Matter.’ And I said why would I do that? And [Lynch] said just call it a ‘Matter.’

https://hannity.com/media-room/breaking-now-new-strzok-page-emails-show-gaps-in-clinton-probe-special-treatment-for-hillarys-attorney/
BREAKING NOW: New Strzok-Page Emails Show ‘Gaps’ in Clinton Probe, ‘Special Treatment’ for Hillary’s Attorney
posted by Hannity Staff - 3 hours ago
Recently obtained emails exchanged between Peter Strzok and Lisa Page show the FBI aimed to accommodate requests from Hillary Clinton’s lawyers leading up to the 2016 race for the White House.

“Internal FBI emails released Monday show FBI officials in 2016 sought to ‘expeditiously’ accommodate a request for information from then-Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s lawyer, in what a conservative watchdog group claimed is evidence of ‘special treatment,’” reports Fox News.

“Judicial Watch – a group that routinely sues for government records – obtained and released 218 pages of emails between former FBI officials Peter Strzok and Lisa Page. Many of the emails have to do with the bureau’s investigation into whether Clinton improperly used a private email server as secretary of state to discuss classified information,” adds the article.

“The emails released Monday, meanwhile, show then-FBI General Counsel James Baker writing that he spoke with Clinton’s lawyer, David Kendall, in August 2016 and promised that the FBI would work to hand over a copy of the 302 from Clinton’s interview ‘expeditiously,’” writes Fox.

Clinton’s email probe was thrust again into the national spotlight last week when former Attorney General Loretta Lynch contradicted James Comey’s Congressional testimony regarding the investigation.

“So you do not believe you ever instructed him to call it a matter?” one lawmaker asked Lynch.

“I did not. I have never instructed a witness as to what to say specifically. Never have. Never will,” fired-back the former Attorney General.

Lynch’s comments directly refute Comey’s Congressional testimony.

QUESTION: And then you made a comment earlier about the Attorney General, previous AG [Lynch] asking you about the investigation on the Clinton emails, saying that you were asked not to call it an ‘Investigation’ anymore, but to call it a ‘Matter.’ And you said that confused you. Can you give us additional details on that?

COMEY: Well, it concerned me, because we were at the point where we refused to confirm the existence of an investigation –as we usually do– for months,. And it was getting to a place where that looked silly, because the campaigns were talking about interacting with the FBI in the course of our work.

The Clinton campaign at the time was using all kinds of euphemisms, ‘security review,’ ‘matter.’ Things like that.

For what was going on. We were getting to a place where the Attorney General and I were going to have to testify and talk publicly about it, and I wanted to know if she would authorize us to confirm we had an investigation. And she said yes, but don’t call it that, call it a ‘Matter.’ And I said why would I do that? And [Lynch] said just call it a ‘Matter.’

Read the full report at Fox News.

NOT A JOKE: Hillary Clinton Says No One in the United States of America is ‘Above the Law’
BUSTED: New Hillary Emails Show Clinton's 'Pay-to-Play' Scheme with Donors
'NOT HELPFUL': Secret Email Shows Strzok ‘WORRIED’ About Hillary Probe
BIAS ALERT: FBI Agents ‘PRESSURED’ to END Hillary Probe After Trump Nomination

https://www.conservativeinstitute.org/conservative-news/obama-officials-talking-iran.htm
Former Obama officials go behind Trump’s back in talks with Iran, Democrats: report
June 1, 2019

Former Obama officials go behind Trump’s back in talks with Iran, Democrats: report
John Gress Media Inc / Shutterstock.com
A bombshell report from the Daily Beast reveals that former Obama administration officials are quietly advising Iran on how to respond to the Trump administration.

Three former Obama officials admitted that they are talking with Iranian government officials, and have also spoken with Democrats in Congress about the Iran situation.

U.S.-Iran tensions
In recent weeks, tensions rose between the United States and Iran. May 28th marked the one-year anniversary since President Trump withdrew from the Iran Nuclear Deal, the “horrible” accomplishment of former President Barack Obama.

Unlike his predecessor, Trump has taken a hardline stance with Iran, telling its leaders that “they cannot have nuclear weapons.” Accustomed to the more conciliatory approach of Obama, a furious Iran responded with the threats of stockpiling enriched uranium and of further violations.

Find Out More >
65,074
Trump responded by sending 1,500 troops to the Middle East as a cautionary measure.

But now, some Republicans fear that Trump’s strategy to contain a dangerous Iran might be being undermined.

Obama officials still in talks with Iran
Three Obama administration officials are said to have been holding “normal” conversations with members of the Iranian government. These individuals additionally recently briefed Democrats in Congress about how to handle the Iran situation.

According to the Daily Beast, at least one official’s message to Iran was: “Don’t take Trump’s bait. Stay calm.” Other officials “are trying to keep the roots of the Iran nuclear deal alive by taking the pulse of lawmakers on Capitol Hill to gauge whether they are in favor of restarting talks in the future.”

 Ads by Revcontent
Undermining U.S. stance toward Iran
As one Republican aide told the Daily Beast, this is concerning — particularly if they are taking a position different from that of the Trump administration.

“It’s not just about what they were saying to the Iranians,” said the aide. “It’s about what they were saying to their political allies back here in the U.S. Their strategy was to divide and isolate the Trump administration just as the Trump administration was trying to re-establish deterrence with Iran. In the current highly partisan political environment, the only safe course is to signal national unity — and they contributed to eroding that at home and abroad.”

“This would explain how they all ended up echoing the same talking points about Bolton and warmongering at the same time. Obama administration officials have been shuttling between the Hill and Iranian officials to help make sure everybody is on the same page,” a Republican staffer told the Washington Examiner.

Breaking the rules
You would think that there would be a rule against a former government official talking to members of a foreign government — and there is.

The Logan Act, passed in 1799, makes illegal the diplomatic talks of private citizens with a foreign government without authorization. The problem, however, is that it is rarely asserted, and no one has ever been found to have violated it.

Nonetheless, if former Obama officials really are undermining Trump’s efforts, something needs to be done. Obama’s administration has already caused enough trouble in Iran.

FBI Conveniently LOSES Notes from Clinton Probe Meeting
by Team Bongino
May 9, 2019
https://bongino.com/fbi-conveniently-loses-notes-from-important-clinton-email-meeting/?utm_source=push&
Newly released FBI documents reveal the FBI lost notes from a 2015 meeting with members of the Intelligence Community Inspector General’s (ICIG) office regarding the Hillary Clinton email investigation, according to the Epoch Times.
The news–according to the publication–raises concerns that information about an “explosive lead” from the ICIG to the FBI may be lost.

The Times writes:

The lost notes memorialized a meeting that took place on Aug. 3, 2015, less than a month after the ICIG made a referral to the FBI that classified information may have been disclosed in an unauthorized manner to a foreign power because Clinton conducted State Department business through an email hosted on an insufficiently secured server in her basement.

The ICIG-FBI meetings hold special significance because it was allegedly several of these meetings where the ICIG officials passed a lead to the FBI about anomalies in the metadata of the emails indicating that a copy of nearly every email was sent to an agent of a foreign power.

The latest FBI documents were released by the bureau on Monday and reveal email communications from February 5 between an intelligence analyst and an FBI staffer:

“I know this is a shot in the dark, but do you still have the meeting notes that you wrote up concerning an 8/3/2015 MRE meeting at FBIHQ? I think [redacted] correct me if I’m wrong) that this meeting was with the ICIG, if that helps matters.”  The analyst said the notes “never made it to the file.” 

“I actually remember turning over my original notes for the file for this (it was right at the beginning of the case),” the staffer responded. “I gave them to [redacted] who was running the file then.”

A document from February 12 reveals the FBI considered the notes missing after the special agent who was to receive the notes from the staffer said he “documented all relevant case material before leaving the case and did not retain any notes or other case materials.”

For the full report, click HERE.https://www.theepochtimes.com/fbi-lost-notes-from-clinton-probe-meeting-significant-to-concerns-over-foreign-exfiltration-lead_2912428.html

vFmr FBI Official: Clinton Emails Found in Obama White House
by Team Bongino
April 24, 2019
TwitterFacebookEmailLinkedInRedditPrintShare
Fmr FBI Official: Clinton Emails Found in Obama White House 2
A former top FBI official claims the bureau found messaegs to and from Hillary Clinton’s private email server in the Obama White House, according to the Epoch Times.

Bill Priestap–the FBI’s former assistant director for counterintelligence–also admitted that the FBI found nearly 49,000 emails from the private Clinton email system on disgraced Anthony Weiner’s laptop.

**LISTEN: Dan discusses the troubling new revelations about Obama’s role in the Hillary email scandal**
https://unitedwithisrael.org/watch-idf-destroys-home-of-samaria-terrorist/?utm_source=pushengage&utm_medium=pushnotification&utm_campaign=pushengage
WATCH: IDF Destroys Home of Samaria Terrorist
Apr 24, 2019
Related:
Achiad Ettinger
Gal Keidan
Omar Abu Laila
Palestinian education
Palestinian terror
“This morning, we demolished his residence,” the IDF stated on Wednesday.
On March 17, 2019, a 19-year-old terrorist carried out two attacks in Samaria at the Ariel and at Gitai Avishar junctions, respectively, killing Staff Sgt. Gal Keidan and Rabbi Achiad Ettinger, a father of 12.
The terrorist, Omar Abu Laila, was honored by the Palestinian Authority for his “martyrdom” by having a square in the Arab village of Abuyon, near Ramallah, named after him. He has become a role model for Palestinian youth.
In an overnight mission in the wee hours of Wednesday morning, the IDF demolished his home.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=27&v=hxS9zha4ZjE&ab_channel=ArutzShevaTV
In January, a federal judge ordered Priestap and other Obama-Clinton officials to answer written questions from government watchdog, Judicial Watch, under oath.
The Epoch Times writes: In the first of 10 questions in the interrogatory, Judicial Watch asked Priestap to identify all former Clinton aides and government agencies where the FBI found the messages to and from her private email system.
In addition to the Executive Office of the President in the Obama White House, Priestap said such emails were found from the State Department, the Secret Service, and the Williams & Connolly LLP law firm, as well as Clinton aides Bryan Pagliano, Cheryl Mills, Heather Samuelson, Jacob Sullivan, and Justin Cooper.

Priestap noted that his list was not comprehensive and that emails to and from other agencies and individuals may have been found but he could not recall them at the time.


For the full report, click HERE.https://www.theepochtimes.com/fbi-exec-tells-judicial-watch-clinton-emails-were-found-in-obama-white-house_2891711.html



https://www.theepochtimes.com/fbi-exec-tells-judicial-watch-clinton-emails-were-found-in-obama-white-house_2891711.html
Former FBI Official: Clinton Emails Found in Obama White House
BY MARK TAPSCOTT
April 23, 2019 Updated: April 23, 2019 Share

WASHINGTON—E.W. “Bill” Priestap, the FBI’s former assistant director for counterintelligence, admitted that messages to and from former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton on her private email system were found in the Obama White House, government watchdog Judicial Watch announced April 23.

Priestap also admitted that the FBI found nearly 49,000 emails from the private Clinton email system on the laptop computer owned by former Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-N.Y.), the husband of Huma Abedin, Clinton’s deputy chief of staff and a longtime close personal aide.

“This astonishing confirmation, made under oath by the FBI, shows that the Obama FBI had to go to President Obama’s White House office to find emails that Hillary Clinton tried to destroy or hide from the American people,” Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said in a statement announcing Priestap’s admission.

“No wonder Hillary Clinton has thus far skated—Barack Obama is implicated in her email scheme,” Fitton added.

Priestap included the “Executive Office of the President” on a list he provided in writing and under oath by Judicial Watch in a written interrogatory that a federal court ordered the former FBI executive to answer.

In the first of 10 questions in the interrogatory, Judicial Watch asked Priestap to identify all former Clinton aides and government agencies where the FBI found the messages to and from her private email system.

In addition to the Executive Office of the President in the Obama White House, Priestap said such emails were found from the State Department, the Secret Service, and the Williams & Connolly LLP law firm, as well as Clinton aides Bryan Pagliano, Cheryl Mills, Heather Samuelson, Jacob Sullivan, and Justin Cooper.

Priestap said the list he provided was not comprehensive and that messages from other individuals and government agencies also may have been found but he didn’t recall them at the time of the interrogatory.

Priestap’s combative responses to the 10 questions from Judicial Watch required 17 pages and included multiple objections, some to minute points, such as whether a question had one or two parts.

The former FBI executive’s responses, as well as those from a number of other individuals, were ordered on Jan. 15, 2019, by U.S. District Court Judge Royce C. Lamberth in a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit first filed by Judicial Watch in 2014.

Lamberth has previously blasted both the Department of Justice and the State Department for acting in “bad faith” regarding the Judicial Watch suit.

Lamberth then ordered the parties to confer and agree on a discovery schedule to determine “whether Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email while Secretary of State was an intentional attempt to evade FOIA; (b) whether the State Department’s attempts to settle this case in late 2014 and early 2015 amounted to bad faith; and (c) whether State has adequately searched for records responsive to Judicial Watch’s requests.”

The discovery of thousands of Clinton emails on the Weiner laptop was first made public by then-FBI Director James Comey in October 2016, shortly before the nation chose between Democrat Clinton and Republican nominee Donald Trump to be president. Nothing of significance was found during a week-long examination of those emails, Comey said afterward.

Priestap told Judicial Watch in his interrogatory that 48,982 emails from the Clinton private email system were found on Weiner’s laptop.

Priestap was involved in both the FBI’s Clinton email investigation and the bureau’s probe of allegations that Trump campaign aides were involved with elements linked to Russian intelligence in an effort to swing the election to the eventual winner.

Contact Mark Tapscott at mark.tapscott@epochtimes.nyc

https://bongino.com/crooked-hillary-says-trump-should-have-been-indicted-in-mueller-probe/
Crooked Hillary Says Trump Should Have Been Indicted in Mueller Probe
by Team Bongino
April 23, 2019
TwitterFacebookEmailLinkedInRedditPrintShare
Crooked Hillary Says Trump Should Have Been Indicted in Mueller Probe 2
Email-deleting, Blackberry-smashing Hillary Clinton said that President Trump should have been indicted for obstruction of justice based on the Mueller probe’s findings.

“I think there’s enough there that any other person who had engaged in those acts would certainly have been indicted. But because of the rule in the Justice Department that you can’t indict a sitting president, the whole matter of obstruction was very directly sent to the Congress,” said the former Secretary of State at the Time 100 summit in New York City
TIME

@TIME
 “I think there is enough there that any other person who had engaged in those acts would certainly have been indicted.” @HillaryClinton on whether Donald Trump obstructed justice or not at the #TIME100 Summit http://mag.time.com/7jBzlRZ 
139
7:46 PM - Apr 23, 2019
108 people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy
Clinton said that Congress should continue to investigate the president, but cautioned Democrats on impeachment discussions.

**LISTEN: Dan discusses the astonishing comments by the liberal presidential candidates at CNN’s town hall last night**

https://kerrypicket.com/sanders-slammed-lying-truth-agents-often-spouted-frustration-comey-clinton-investigation/
Sanders Slammed For ‘Lying,’ But The Truth Is Agents Often Spouted FRUSTRATION About Comey And The Clinton Investigation 1 Former FBI Director James Comey
Reports of rank and file FBI agents’ dissatisfaction over then-FBI Director James Comey’s handling of the Clinton-email probe were circulated by the media in late 2016, despite the media’s current amnesia that such news reports ever existed.

White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders weathered criticism by the media in the last week, which claimed she lied when she previously told reporters in May 2017 that Comey was fired because he lost the confidence of President Donald Trump, the Department of Justice and members of both parties in Congress. (RELATED: Prior Reporting Confirmed That Some FBI Agents Were Fed Up With Comey)

The special counsel’s report released last week showed she clarified her statement to Mueller investigators.

“Sanders told this Office that her reference to hearing from ‘countless members of the FBI’ was a ‘slip of the tongue,’” it said.

In a subsequent interview on Fox News last Thursday, Sanders said she should not have used the word “countless” when describing the quantity of FBI agents. Media outlets, though, accused Sanders of making up the entire story itself. CNN’s April Ryan went as far as to call for Sanders to be fired for lying about the issue.

Comey has singlehandedly ruined the reputation of the organization…

But media outlets and media personalities received multiple leaks from FBI employees, including agents themselves about the frustrations they had with Comey — particularly when it came to the email probe and the Clinton Foundation investigation.

CNN’s Pamela Brown reported in 2016, just six days before the election, that she and Evan Perez spoke to “more than a dozen officials and agents” and found that FBI agents wanted to investigate the Clinton Foundation much earlier that year but were continually stifled because the “roadblocks” from the Justice Department were “politically driven.”

In 2016, Comey faced criticism from Clinton opponents for not indicting anyone within the Clinton campaign for mishandling classified material from her private e-mail server and delivering his decision on the matter in a July 5 press conference.

Additionally, questions arose about why investigators granted Clinton and her counsel more privileges than most witnesses would have during such a sensitive probe, including granting immunity deals to Clinton lawyers Heather Samuelson and Cheryl Mills in exchange for their laptops.

Months later Comey faced further criticism from Clinton supporters when he sent a letter to Congress just days before the election saying the bureau would need to look into the Clinton e-mail probe again as a result of sexually charged messages found on Anthony Weiner’s laptop. Weiner was married to Clinton’s top aide, Huma Abedin, at the time.

The New York Post reported on October 6 about agents who were angered with Comey over the “whitewashing” of the Clinton investigation. Agents told the Post that Comey essentially tied their hands and restricted what they could do during the e-mail probe.

“In my 25 years with the bureau, I never had any ground rules in my interviews,” retired agent Dennis V. Hughes, the first chief of the FBI’s computer investigations unit, told the Post at the time.

“Comey has singlehandedly ruined the reputation of the organization,” retired FBI agent Michael M. Biasello concurred.

Around the same time, The Wall Street Journal reported an “internal feud” at the FBI over the Clinton e-mail probe. In the piece, the Journal reported of Comey:

The new investigative effort, disclosed by FBI Director James Comey on Friday, shows a bureau at times in sharp internal disagreement over matters related to the Clintons, and how to handle those matters fairly and carefully in the middle of a national election campaign.

On October 31, 2016, The Washington Post’s Dana Milbank joined the criticism of Comey when he questioned why the then-FBI director felt the need to re-open Clinton e-mail probe 11 days before the election.

Amid different suggestions of ways Comey could explain his actions, he referenced the upheaval in New York FBI field office at the time using Comey’s voice. Milbank wrote FBI “agents in the New York office were nearing mutiny.

“It was getting harder to keep them in line. Then, last week, they jammed me. They sat on the new information for weeks, then dumped it on me 12 days before the election,” he added.

Despite the sarcastic tone of Milbank’s writing, Yahoo News asked if a “mutiny” was started by career agents at the New York FBI office, upset at Comey’s decision not to indict Clinton, who used the Weiner sexting scandal to pressure Comey to send the letter to Congress.

Rudy Giuliani, a supporter of the Trump campaign and former federal prosecutor as well as former mayor of New York City, made an appearance on television two days before the election. He claimed his sources within the bureau said agents were upset over the way the Clinton e-mail probe was led.

Sanders Slammed For ‘Lying,’ But The Truth Is Agents Often Spouted FRUSTRATION About Comey And The Clinton Investigation 2

“I’m not part of it at all. All I heard were former FBI agents telling me that there’s a revolution going on inside the FBI and it’s now at a boiling point,” Giuliani said on November 4 on “Fox & Friends” when asked if he knew anything about Comey re-opening the e-mail probe before the letter was sent to Congress.

“I think they kept getting stymied looking for subpoenas, looking for records. I did nothing to get it out, I had no role in it… did I hear about it? You’re darn right I heard about it and I can’t even repeat the language that I heard from the former FBI,” Giuliani added.

Comey told Congress two years later in a closed-door hearing about agents in the New York FBI field office leaking information related to the Clinton e-mail probe to Giuliani.

“I was concerned that there appeared to be in the media a number of stories that might have been based on communications reporters or non-reporters like Rudy Giuliani were having with people in the New York field office,” he said.

The Clinton email investigation was scrutinized by the Justice Department’s Inspector General in a 500-page report in 2018. The IG blasted Comey’s handling of the investigation in several areas.

Comey “engaged in ad hoc decision-making based on his personal views, even if it meant rejecting longstanding Department policy or practice,” the IG report said.

The report also described FBI rank and file employees who appeared to not follow their own leadership.

“We identified numerous FBI employees, at all levels of the organization and with no official reason to be in contact with the media, who were nevertheless in frequent contact with reporters,” the IG report stated. “We have profound concerns about the volume and extent of unauthorized media contacts by FBI personnel that we have uncovered during our review.”
Kerry's Must Watch

Rush Limbaugh: ‘Zilch, zero, nada’ dispute about Hillary Clinton’s ties to Steele dossier
April 17, 2019
https://www.conservativeinstitute.org/conservative-news/rush-limbaugh-hillary-dossier.htm?utm_source=aimtell&utm_campaign=automated_push&utm_medium=push
Rush Limbaugh: ‘Zilch, zero, nada’ dispute about Hillary Clinton’s ties to Steele dossier
Image Source: Screenshot
Conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh provided evidence on his Tuesday morning show tying Hillary Clinton to the infamous Steele dossier that was used as a legal predicate to spy on the Trump presidential campaign.  

“There’s no dispute — zilch, zero, nada– that this phony, uncorroborated, unconfirmed, unverifiable dossier was a work of art that was ordered and commissioned by the Hillary Clinton campaign through Fusion GPS, which was paid by a cutout law firm,” Limbaugh said, describing the chain of responsibility tying Clinton to the dossier.

The “three-headed beast”
Responding to questions from a caller, Limbaugh connected the dots establishing Clinton as the chief financier who tried to take down Donald Trump using a dossier filled with unverified facts and salacious allegations.

“The dossier was actually paid for by the Clinton campaign, run through a cutout company called Fusion GPS, which hired Steele,” Limbaugh said, referring to former British spy Christopher Steele. “Fusion GPS is Glenn Simpson. The paying entity was actually a law firm, Perkins Coie. So there’s a three-level or three-headed beast here. But the Washington Post, Randy, is the ultimate source for this.”

Pain Relief Shoe Insole
Liveyourexpression
Ads by Revcontent
Find Out More >
79,666
Limbaugh reconstructed the complex trail of law firms and research agencies leading straight back to Clinton:

A lawyer who represented the campaign, meaning the Hillary campaign, retained Fusion GPS. It was Fusion GPS that hired Steele to then create the dossier. The Clinton campaign hired Fusion. Fusion knew Steele from work done together long ago. They hired Steele to go out and dig up dirt on Trump. All of this, by the way, was confirmed in a story in the Washington Post, Randy. That’s how we all learned about this. The Washington Post confirmed this route.

The bottom line
Although Fusion GPS was originally hired by Republicans, Limbaugh explained how the firm’s mission evolved once the Clinton campaign became involved.


“Clinton lawyer Marc Elias then retained Fusion GPS in April of 2016 and paid for them to continue their work until just days before the presidential election,” he said.

“So the bottom line is, the dossier’s origins begin with the Hillary Clinton campaign. There is no dispute about this. This is why everybody is so mind boggled that this thing was used to get FISA warrants,” Limbaugh added.

 Ads by Revcontent
19 Prom Photos We Couldn't Believe Were Taken. Try Not to Gasp at #7
Ready Set Health
Susan Boyle is So Skinny Now and Actually Looks Gorgeous
Ready Set Health
Sweden Stuns the EU Votes Down Euro in Referendum
Hammingtons
Spygate
Citing a recent New York Post article by former federal prosecutor and National Review editor Andy McCarthy, Limbaugh explained how the Steele dossier was then used as the pretense to electronically monitor Trump aide Carter Page and implant spies within the campaign. “But the big takeaway is that there was never any evidence of collusion,” the conservative pundit said.

McCarthy’s report, summarized by Limbaugh, clarifies how it was Trump, and not just “a few potential bad actors in the campaign’s orbit,” who was the target of the Obama administration’s spy operation. The former prosecutor revealed the shocking details of how Obama’s intelligence and law enforcement chiefs convened a meeting just before Trump took office in 2017 to discuss how to hide the details of the FBI’s ongoing Russia investigation from the president-elect.


“That only makes sense if the Obama administration’s premise was that Donald Trump himself was a Russian agent,” McCarthy wrote, disputing Democratic claims that the Obama administration was conducting a counterintelligence operation, and not a spy campaign against a political rival.

Limbaugh agreed. “The origins are not in the intelligence community,” he said. “They are not from spies calling Americans and saying, ‘My God, we’ve learned what our own government’s doing trying to tamper with your election.’ None of that. This is made-up stuff.”

Report: Ken Starr believed Hillary Clinton helped drive Vince Foster to suicide
April 11, 2019
Report: Ken Starr believed Hillary Clinton helped drive Vince Foster to suicide
https://www.conservativeinstitute.org/conservative-news/hillary-clinton-vince-foster.htm?utm_source=dc2&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=dc2-1
Although the Clinton family has been accused of their fair share of bizarre and absurd conspiracies — from cat murder to kiddy porn — one long-held allegation was just given a boost of credibility.

Author Ronald Kessler says that former independent counsel Ken Starr has admitted for the first time that he believed then-First Lady Hillary Clinton may have driven deputy White House counsel Vince Foster to take his own life.

Pushed to the brink
Appointed as independent counsel in 1994, Starr was investigating the Clintons’ role in the 1970s Whitewater scandal when FBI agents discovered that Hillary Clinton publicly humiliated Foster just one week before his suicide in 1993. 

Writing for DailyMail.com, Kessler said he approached Starr following an event during the 2019 Annapolis Book Festival and “asked Starr why he omitted the damaging FBI finding” from his 1998 congressional report.

Ads by Revcontent
Find Out More >
57,493
He said Starr was initially reluctant to indulge his questions and pointed to well-established facts surrounding Foster’s suicide. The Clinton legal aide had a long history of depression and was having difficulty adjusting to life in Washington.

After Kessler pressed him on the subject, however, he says Starr eventually admitted that he omitted details of Clinton’s behavior from the report because he “did not want to inflict further pain” on the first lady. One week after Clinton excoriated Foster in front of his coworkers, the counselor shot himself at Fort Marcy Park along the Potomac River

Kessler also interviewed some of the FBI agents who investigated the circumstances leading up to Foster’s suicide while writing his New York Times bestselling book, The First Family Detail.

“Hillary put him down really, really bad in a pretty good-size meeting,” Coy Copeland, a federal agent, told Kessler. “She told him he didn’t get the picture, and he would always be a little hick town lawyer who was obviously not ready for the big time.”

 Ads by Revcontent
Foster wasn’t accustomed to life in Washington after spending the majority of his life in his native Arkansas. Unlike many of his colleagues, he lacked experience in national politics and campaigning and was struggling with emotional instability.

“Foster was profoundly depressed, but Hillary lambasting him was the final straw because she publicly embarrassed him in front of others,” former FBI agent Jim Clemente told Kessler.

“Hillary blamed him for failed nominations, claimed he had not vetted them properly, and said in front of his White House colleagues, ‘You’re not protecting us’ and ‘You have failed us,'” Clemente told Kessler. “That was the final blow.”

Jekyll and Hyde
While it is easy to dismiss most of the far-fetched Clinton conspiracies, this account matches the testimony of other eyewitnesses who described Hillary Clinton as “erratic, uncontrollable, and occasionally violent” with her staff.

Gary Byrne, a former secret service officer who worked outside the Oval Office during Bill Clinton’s presidency, described the first lady as having a “Jekyll and Hyde” personality that frightened staff members.

“When I first met her, we were given specific instructions: don’t look at her, don’t look at her general direction and if you need to talk to her, keep it short and stay out of her way,” an unnamed agent told the New York Post in 2016.

In fact, Clinton apparently treated her security detail so poorly that when she broke her elbow in 2009, they laughed at her misfortune. “We sort of got the last laugh. It was kind of like payback: You’re treating us like s***. Hey karma is a b****! We were smiling to ourselves,” the anonymous agent said.

If only Starr would have shared his thoughts with Congress in 1998, future employees working for Hillary Clinton could have been spared her tyrannical management style. Indeed, if Starr would have spilled the beans, perhaps America could have been spared the experience of Benghazi, an email scandal and coverup, and two failed presidential runs.

https://bongino.com/documents-reveal-cover-up-discussions-relating-to-clinton-email-scandal/
Documents Reveal “Cover-up” Discussions Relating to Clinton Email Scandal
by Team Bongino
April 10, 2019

Conservative Watchdog group Judicial Watch has uncovered 422 pages of FBI documents showing evidence of “cover-up” discussions from the IT company, Platte River Networks, which managed Hillary Clinton’s email server.
FBI notes of an interview with an unidentified Platte River Networks employee in February 2016 show that the IT company “gave someone access to live HRC archive mailbox at some point.”

The notes go on to show an email from Dec 11, 2014 which reads, ““Hillary cover up operation work ticket archive cleanup.”

The unidentified employee said that the “cover up operation” email “probably related to change to 60 day [sic] email retention policy/backup.” The subject indicated that he didn’t “recall the prior policy.” The notes also indicated, “[Redacted] advised [redacted] not to answer questions related to conv [conversation] w/DK [David Kendall] document 49 – based on 5th amendment.”

Other documents uncovered by Judicial Watch include:

A Platte River Networks email between redacted parties on December 11, 2014: “Its [sic] all part of the Hillary coverup operation I’ll have to tell you about it at the party”
An Email from Platte River Networks in August 2015: “So does this mean we don’t have offsite backups currently? That could be a problem if someone hacks this thing and jacks it up. We will have to be able to produce a copy of it somehow, or we’re in some deep sh*t. Also, what ever [sic] came from the guys at Datto about the old backups? Do they have anyway [sic] of getting those back after we were told to cut it to 30 days?”
In March 2015, Platte River Networks specifically discusses security of the email server: [Redacted] is going to send over a list of recommendations for us to apply for additional security against hackers. He did say we should probably remove all Clinton files, folders, info off our servers etc. on an independent drive.
Documents show the IT company also used BleachBit on Clinton’s email server which was downloaded from a vendor called SourceForge at 11:42 am on March 31, 2015 and was used to delete files from Clinton’s server.

Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton says, “Judicial Watch uncovered new ‘cover-up’ records on the illicit Clinton email system that further demonstrate the sham nature of the FBI/DOJ ‘investigation’ of hee. These shocking new documents show that various Obama agencies were protecting Hillary Clinton from the consequences of her misconduct. It is well past time for the DOJ to stop shielding Hillary Clinton and hold her fully accountable to the rule of law.”


For the full report, click HERE. https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-uncovers-cover-up-discussions-in-latest-production-of-clinton-email-documents/?utm_source=t.co&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=press%20release


Judicial Watch Uncovers ‘Cover-Up’ Discussions in Latest Production of Clinton Email Documents
APRIL 08, 2019
https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-uncovers-cover-up-discussions-in-latest-production-of-clinton-email-documents/?utm_source=t.co&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=press%20release
Email PrintText Size
Intelligence IG Details ‘Hundreds’ of Classified Emails and Suggests Entire ‘Collection’ Could Be Classified

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that it uncovered 422 pages of FBI documents showing evidence of “cover-up” discussions related to the Clinton email system within Platte River Networks, one of the vendors who managed the Clinton email system. The documents also show Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG) Charles McCullough forwarding “concerns” about classified information in former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s emails.

The new documents uncovered by Judicial Watch also contain Clinton’s 2009 classified information Non-Disclosure Agreement bearing her signature.

An October 2016 Judicial Watch Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of Justice (No. 1:16-cv-02046)) forced the release of the new FBI documents.  Judicial Watch lawsuit filed after the Justice Department failed to comply with a July 7, 2016, FOIA request seeking:

All FD-302 forms prepared pursuant to the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s investigation of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s use of a private e-mail server during her tenure.
All records of communications between any agent, employee, or representative of the Federal Bureau of Investigation regarding, concerning, or related to the aforementioned investigation. This request includes, but is not limited to, any related communications with any official, employee, or representative of the Department of Justice, the Executive Office of the President, the Democratic National Committee, and/or the presidential campaign of Hillary Clinton.
All records related to the meeting between Attorney General Lynch and former President Bill Clinton on June 27, 2016.
FBI notes of an interview with an unidentified Platte River Networks official in February 2016 (almost a year after the Clinton email network was first revealed) show that Platte River “gave someone access to live HRC archive mailbox at some point.” The same notes show that an email from December 11, 2014, exists that reads “Hillary cover up operation work ticket archive cleanup.” The interviewee said that the “cover up operation” email “probably related to change to 60 day [sic] email retention policy/backup.” The subject indicated that he didn’t “recall the prior policy.” The notes also indicated, “[Redacted] advised [redacted] not to answer questions related to conv [conversation] w/DK [David Kendall] document 49 – based on 5th amendment.”

The subject said that “everyone @ PRN has access to client portal.”

A December 11, 2014, Platte River Networks email between redacted parties says: “Its [sic] all part of the Hillary coverup operation I’ll have to tell you about it at the party”

An August 2015 email from Platte River Networks says: “So does this mean we don’t have offsite backups currently? That could be a problem if someone hacks this thing and jacks it up. We will have to be able to produce a copy of it somehow, or we’re in some deep shit. Also, what ever [sic] came from the guys at Datto about the old backups? Do they have anyway [sic] of getting those back after we were told to cut it to 30 days?”

In March 2015, Platte River Networks specifically discusses security of the email server.

[Redacted] is going to send over a list of recommendations for us to apply for additional security against hackers. He did say we should probably remove all Clinton files, folders, info off our servers etc. on an independent drive.

Handwritten notes that appear to be from Platte River Networks in February 2016 mention questions concerning the Clinton email system and state of back-ups

The documents show Platte River Networks’ use of BleachBit on the Clinton server. The BleachBit program was downloaded from a vendor called SourceForge at 11:42am on March 31, 2015, according to a computer event log, and over the next half hour, was used to delete the files on Hillary’s server.

The documents also contain emails and handwritten notes written in June and July 2015 from the Office of the Intelligence Community Inspector General discussing “concerns” over classified information. A redacted sender writes to State Department Official Margaret “Peggy” Grafeld that “inadvertent release of State Department’s equities when this collection is released in its entirety — the potential damage to the foreign relations of the United States could be significant. ICIG McCullough forwards the concern, saying: “Need you plugged in on this.”

From: [Redacted]

Sent: Saturday, June 27, 2015 2:46 PM

To: Grafeld, Margaret P [Peggy]

Subject: Concerns about the HRC Review …

While working with this inspector, I have personally reviewed hundreds of documents in the HRC collection. I can now say, without reservation, that there are literally hundreds of classified emails in this collection; maybe more. For example, there are comments by Department staff in emails relating to the Wikileaks unauthorized disclosures; many of the emails relating to this actually confirm the information in the disclosures. This material is the subject of FOIA litigation, and the emails will now have to be found, reviewed and upgraded. Under the EO 13526, it would be in in our right to classify the entire HRC collection at the Secret level because of the “mosaic effect.” While there may be IC equities in the collection, I am very concerned about the inadvertent release of State Department’s equities when this collection is released in its entirety — the potential damage to the foreign relations of the United States could be significant.

***

            From: Chuck Mccullough [sic]

Sent: Monday, June 29, 2015 11:16 AM

To: [Redacted]

Subject: FW: SBU FW: Concerns about the HRC Review …

[Redacted]

Need you plugged in on this. Need to coordinate w/ State’s WB person.

In an August 2015 classified memo prepared by the FBI Counterintelligence Division regarding the findings of the ICIG with respect to Hillary’s email server, the FBI noted that the ICIG had found that in a sampling of only 40 of Hillary’s 30,000 emails, four classified emails were found. A subsequent letter sent by Sen. Richard Burr (R-NC) to ODNI Clapper regarding this sample of Clinton’s emails noted that they were all classified at the secret level.

In an August 2015 internal FBI memo, the FBI notes that Hillary Clinton had signed a June 28, 2011, official correspondence advising all State Department employees that, “due to ‘recent targeting of personal e-mail accounts by online adversaries,’ State employees should ‘avoid conducting official Department business from (their) personal e-mail accounts.” The same FBI memo noted that Under Secretary of State for Management Patrick Kennedy had sent a memo to all senior State Department officials on August 28, 2014, in which Kennedy included excerpts from the Foreign Affairs Manual that said that “classified information must be sent via classified e-mail channels only…”

The documents uncovered by Judicial Watch also show infighting between State Department Under Secretary Patrick Kennedy and the ICIG over the processing of the potentially compromised Clinton email communications.

A June 15, 2015, memo for the record prepared by the ICIG regarding the State Department’s review of Hillary Clinton’s emails indicates among other things that the retired foreign service officers that State was using to review Hillary’s emails were not “not optimal.”

Evaluation of other agencies’ equities is not optimal. State Department is currently relying on retired senior Foreign Service Officers to review for other agencies’ equities in FOIA cases. For example, a review of the first set of 296 emails received from former-Secretary Clinton and released on the State Department FOIA website identified material that should have been referred to IC FOIA officials for review prior to release. Recommend State Department FOIA Office request staff support from IC FOIA offices to assist in the identification of intelligence community equities. [Emphasis in original]

***

According to State FOIA personnel, during the State Department Legal Office’s review, four of the Bl [national security] exemptions were removed and· changed to “B5” FOIA exemptions (Privileged Communications). Recommend State Department FOIA Office seek classification expertise from the interagency to act as a final arbiter if there is a question regarding potentially classified materials. [Emphasis in original]

It is unclear if the Department of Justice is reviewing the emails before FOIA release. Former-Secretary Clinton’s emails are the subject of numerous FOIA requests and multiple FOIA lawsuits. It may be prudent to integrate the Department of Justice into the FOIA process review to ensure the redactions can withstand potential legal challenges. If not already being done, recommend the State Department FOIA Office incorporate the Department of Justice into the FOIA process to ensure the legal sufficiency review of the FOIA exemptions and redactions.  [Emphasis in original]

An August 4, 2015, interview by the FBI of State Department IG Steven Linick mentions an incident on “May 13, 2011 2:28 am Huma – Phil Rein potential hack.”

On October 15, 2012, Clinton’s IT technician Bryan Pagliano, sent to Bill Clinton’s aide Justin Cooper a bill indicating that on July 28-29, 2012, Pagliano had to address the issue of “Mailbox Corruption” of Hillary Clinton’s email server, spending a total of 5.5 hours on the problem. Other invoices show that he had to “fix corruption in justin’s [Cooper’s] mailbox; ” have a “conference call with security team;” “Blocked spamer [sic] smtp address for Viagra message;” “virus investigation and cleanup;” “clean up virus from bb [BlackBerry] profile;” and multiple “brute force attacks” against Hillary Clinton’s server, requiring him to “reset password.” The documents show that Pagliano was paid $40,337.86 over four years by the Clinton Executive Service Corp.

In a 2016 deposition in a separate Judicial Watch lawsuit, Pagliano repeatedly invoked his Fifth Amendment right to not answer questions regarding IT support he provided to the Clinton email system.

An August 2015 letter from the United States Secret Service to the Counterintelligence Division of the FBI, addressing a request regarding preservation of records in connection with Clinton’s email system. The letter also cites Judicial Watch’s litigation concerning preservation of her email server records. The Secret Service writes that its searches “did not reveal any responsive documents … [n]otwithstanding, the Secret Service will send out a preservation request for the Agency records listed in your correspondence …”

A July 2015 letter from the National Archives requests information from the State Department regarding “the training, procedures and other controls” employed by the State Department to ensure key record management directives were implemented regarding “the management of email and other electronic records of senior agency officials.” Also, the Archives requests “that the Department contact the representatives of former Secretary Clinton to secure the native electronic versions with associated metadata” of the 55,000 hard copies of emails provided to the State Department.

November 2012 classified emails from Jake Sullivan, Clinton’s top foreign policy adviser, discuss a “Report of arrests – possible Benghazi connection” with her.

A request for travel dated November 2015 shows that the FBI dispatched special agents to Spain and Bahrain to conduct interviews in the “Midyear Exam” regarding a “sensitive investigative matter.”

Other released materials include letters from Clinton’s personal lawyer David Kendall throughout the production. On June 24, 2015, Kendall writes to the State Department Inspector General that the State Department is in possession of “all Secretary Clinton’s work-related … emails:” He continues that, as Hillary’s personal counsel, “We continue to retain a preservation copy of the .pst file containing the electronic copies of those e-mails, on a thumb drive that is stored in a secured safe at the offices of Williams and Connolly …”

I note at the outset that the Department of State is in possession of all of Secretary Clinton’s work-related and potentially work-related e-mails. Specifically, in response to an October 2014 letter request from the Department of State, Secretary Clinton’s counsel identified all work-related or potentially work-related e-mail in her possession, custody, or control. In total, 30,490 e-mails, all of which were from her @clintonemail.com account, were identified and provided in hard copy to the Department of State in _December 2014. A3 her personal counsel, we continue to retain a preservation copy of the .pst file containing the electronic copies of those e-mails, on a thumb drive that is stored in a secured safe at the offices of Williams & Connolly LLP, 725 12th Street NW, Washington DC 20005. The only two persons authorized to access that thumb drive are me and my law partner, Katherine Turner.

“Judicial Watch uncovered new ‘cover-up’ records on the illicit Clinton email system that further demonstrate the sham nature of the FBI/DOJ ‘investigation’ of her,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “These shocking new documents show that various Obama agencies were protecting Hillary Clinton from the consequences of her misconduct. It is well past time for the DOJ to stop shielding Hillary Clinton and hold her fully accountable to the rule of law.”

In a different lawsuit Judicial Watch previously released 186 pages of records from the DOJ that include emails documenting an evident cover-up of a chart of potential violations of law by former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

And, in a separate lawsuit, Judicial Watch uncovered 215 pages of records from the DOJ revealing former FBI General Counsel James Baker discussed the investigation of Clinton-related emails on Anthony Weiner’s laptop with Kendall. Baker then forwarded the conversation to his FBI colleagues.

Judicial Watch has previously released numerous instances of classified information distributed through Clinton’s unsecure, non-government email system. For example, see here, here and here.

And, Judicial Watch is currently conducting depositions of senior Obama-era State Department officials, lawyers, and Clinton aides.

Mark Levin calls for probe of Obama administration’s role in Russia collusion narrative
March 27, 2019

Mark Levin calls for probe of Obama administration’s role in Russia collusion narrative
Image Source: Screenshot
Mark Levin came out swinging over the weekend against the Obama administration officials who promoted the now-discredited Trump-Russia collusion hoax. 

Speaking on his Fox News show on Sunday, the nationally syndicated radio host called for an investigation into the Obama government for its role in spying on now-President Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign and getting the Russia collusion probe, headed by Robert Mueller, off the ground.

Mueller’s investigation concluded Friday with the special counsel recommending no new indictments, and his subsequent report dealt a profound blow to the left’s central political narrative of the last two years.  With Russigate falling apart in spectacular fashion, Levin said that the real collusion has been exposed: between the Obama intelligence community, the Democrats, and the media.

Levin calls for accountability in Russia hoax
“You have collusion — between the Democratic Party, the media, and the Obama administration,” Levin said on Sunday. “The Democratic Party is not a pro-America party. They act like a third-world party because they want to destroy this presidency. It is time to focus on the Democrats in the House. It is time to focus on the media, the Hillary campaign, the DNC, Barack Obama — this was Barack Obama’s government that did all this when interfering in our election.”

As the Russia hoax saturated headlines for almost two years, mostly conservative journalists and outlets have uncovered what the smoke from Russiagate obscured: the Democrats and the Clinton campaign paid for political opposition research provided by Fusion GPS, contained in the infamous Christopher Steele Dossier, which the Obama administration then used to launch an investigation into the Trump campaign.

The Obama Justice Department used the allegations in that dossier — now proven beyond a shadow of a doubt to be false — to obtain warrants under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) to spy on an unsuspecting, low-ranking Trump campaign official, Carter Page. That spying marked the inception of the Russia collusion investigation that dogged Trump for the first half of his first term in office.
MORE https://www.conservativeinstitute.org/conservative-news/levin-probe-obama-russia.htm?utm_source=aimtell&utm_campaign=automated_push&utm_medium=push

https://www.hannity.com/media-room/mueller-who-hillary-clinton-returns-after-no-collusion-report-to-comment-on-climate-change/
MUELLER WHO? Hillary Clinton Returns After ‘No Collusion’ Report to Comment on ‘Climate Change’
posted by Hannity Staff - 60 mins ago
Twice-failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton re-emerged Monday just hours after Robert Mueller’s summary on ‘Russian Collusion’ was released to Congressional leaders; ignoring the special counsel’s report and warning Americans of the dangers posed by climate change.

“Two realities we must confront:
1. Climate change won’t just affect the coasts.
2. Climate change is a national security issue,” posted Clinton on social media.

https://www.hannity.com/media-room/mueller-who-hillary-clinton-returns-after-no-collusion-report-to-comment-on-climate-change/
Hillary Clinton

@HillaryClinton
 Two realities we must confront: 
1. Climate change won't just affect the coasts. 
2. Climate change is a national security issue. https://nbcmontana.com/news/nation-world/floods-show-national-security-threat-posed-by-climate-change …

27.4K
7:53 PM - Mar 25, 2019
Twitter Ads info and privacy

Floods show national security threat posed by climate change
OFFUTT AIR FORCE BASE, Neb. (AP) — The Missouri River floodwater surging on to the air base housing the U. S. military's Strategic Command overwhelmed round-the-clock sandbagging by airmen and...

nbcmontana.com
14.6K people are talking about this
Two realities we must confront: 
1. Climate change won't just affect the coasts. 
2. Climate change is a national security issue. https://t.co/q32xFMjyUn

— Hillary Clinton (@HillaryClinton) March 25, 2019

The former Secretary of State has largely blamed Russian-Collusion on her 2016 defeat to Donald Trump; claiming outside factors led to her historic loss in swing-states across the country.

Sen. Lindsey Graham calls for new investigation into Hillary Clinton
March 24, 2019 by Jerry McCormick
Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) just about brought the house down at a fundraiser at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort over the weekend.
https://www.patriotnewsalerts.com/graham-calls-for-clinton/?utm_medium=ci&utm_source=push&utm_campaign=pna
With Robert Mueller’s investigation into alleged Trump-Russia collusion finally over, Graham said it’s time to launch an investigation into Hillary Clinton over the infamous Christopher Steele dossier.

It didn’t take long for the crowd to erupt into chants: “Lock her up!”

Time To Go
Now that the focus is off Trump colluding with the Russians, the document that started this mess is coming under even more scrutiny.

The Steele dossier was originally ordered by a Trump enemy. But when he stopped financing it, Clinton’s campaign and the Democratic National Committee (DNC) chipped in so the dossier could be completed.

We now know the dossier was completed largely using a CNN research tool called iReport.

Once completed, the dossier forwarded to the Justice Department — in part thanks to the late Sen. John McCain — where it was used to convince a judge to grant a warrant to surveil a 2016 Trump campaign staffer.

Yet, no one has been held accountable for this. What gives?

Lock Her Up
One of the things we learned throughout the several investigations into Trump and his team is that the FBI investigation into Hillary Clinton may have been conducted with bias.

Time and time again, we have seen proof that former FBI Director James Comey and several members of his investigative team did more to protect Clinton than they did to actually uncover any wrongdoing.

Learn more about RevenueStripe...
Comey clearly thought Clinton was going to win, so it is fairly reasonable to assume he was conducting that investigation to protect his job.

The dossier mentioned above was actually debunked by Comey, and he still used it when filing for the warrants.

The fact that the dossier was financed by Clinton then ended up in the hands of Comey is, in itself, a reason for concern.

As Graham said, it’s time someone to start looking into all of this. Someone needs to be held accountable.

Hillary Clinton says Stacey Abrams should be governor of Georgia during ‘Bloody Sunday’ speech
March 5, 2019 by Jerry McCormick
https://www.patriotnewsalerts.com/hillary-claims-abrahams-should/?utm_medium=ci&utm_source=push&utm_campaign=pna
Image via K2 images / Shutterstock.com
Hillary Clinton simply cannot accept that she and some of her fellow Democrats were defeated in elections.

While making an appearance for the anniversary of “Bloody Sunday,” Hillary stated, “Stacy Abrams should be governor, leading that state right now.”

Bloody Sunday
Clinton was invited to speak at the reenactment of the march from Selma to Montgomery near the Edmund Pettis Bridge.

This has become a highly-politicized event, with high-profile Democrats often grabbing some camera time to promote themselves or other candidates.

On this day, though, Hillary Clinton, who once vowed to try to help unite the country after her defeat, blatantly accused the current administration of racism.

Hillary also claimed Abrams was robbed of her victory because of discrimination that prevented minorities from getting out to vote.

Clinton stated, “We know, don’t we, that candidates both black and white lost their races because they had been deprived of the votes they otherwise would have gotten.”

“And the clearest example is from Georgia. Stacey Abrams should be governor, leading that state right now,” Clinton added.

No, Hillary, Abrams lost by more than 50,000 votes because the majority of Georgians did not want her as their governor, period.

False Narrative to Stir the Pot
Additionally, Hillary is just flat-out wrong. She claimed fewer voters were on the rolls in 2016 than in 2012.

The fact is, active voter registration went up by roughly 15,000 people during that time span (inactive and active combined were up by more than 500,000).

Furthermore, there were more than 200,000 additional votes cast in 2016 in the state than there were in 2012. These numbers are not even debatable, as they come directly from the official site of Georgia.

So, Hillary blatantly lies to push a bogus narrative, yet nobody calls her out on it.T hat probably has something to do with why her trust ratings were so low and she is a twice-failed presidential candidate.

Twice-failed candidate Hillary Clinton officially closed-the-door on rumors of a potential third bid for the White House this week; saying she’s “not running” after rumors swirled of another presidential campaign.
https://www.hannity.com/media-room/failure-to-launch-hillary-clinton-says-shes-not-running-for-president-in-2020/
Clinton was speaking with local Westchester News12 when she was asked if she was considering another run for the Democratic nomination.
 Embedded video
Sky News

@SkyNews
 Former presidential candidate Hillary Clinton has confirmed she will not contest the 2020 US election, but also said she's 'not going anywhere'
For more, head here: http://po.st/ToIJO7 
77
2:30 PM - Mar 5, 2019
73 people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy
“I’m not running, but I’m going to keep working and speaking and standing-up for what I believe,” said Clinton.
“I want to be sure that people understand I’m going to keep speaking out. I’m not going anywhere,” she added.
According to Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas’ Fatah Party, Jews deserved to be killed by the Nazis because of “who they are.”
By: United with Israel Staff, with files from Palestinian Media Watch
On Facebook, Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas’ Fatah Party posted photos from World War II together with a false account it presented as historically accurate.
According to Fatah’s tall tale, Jews eagerly consented to bury alive a group of Russian civilians to save their own lives at the behest of the Nazis. According to the Fatah post, a Nazi soldier “stopped [the Jews] and took [the Russians] out,” shouting at the Russians ‘I just wanted you to know who the Jews are and why we are killing them!'”

The post was reported by Palestinian Media Watch (PMW), which noted, “Fatah chose to post the text without comment. It did not condemn this story for portraying Jews as evil, selfish, and ungrateful. Nor did it distance itself from the Nazi commander’s justification of the murder of Jews in the Holocaust based on the anti-Semitic libel that Jews are defined by these character traits.”
PMW explained, “Fatah’s antisemitic story justifying the murder of Jews in the Holocaust does bear some similarities to a historical account documented by a JTA news release on Nov. 27, 1942. However, in reality, Jews and Ukrainians all acted heroically by refusing to bury each other alive, and therefore were all murdered by the Nazis.”

This Facebook post is only the latest example of virulent anti-Semitism promoted by Fatah and the Palestinian Authority (PA).
For example, PMW exposed a sermon broadcast on official PA TV a few months ago in which Sheikh Osama Al-Tibi declared, “These are the Jews who expose their fangs whenever they get the chance. They are causing devastating corruption throughout the land. … Always fighting, always corrupting, always scheming, and always plotting against humanity – not just against the Muslims, but rather against all humanity.”

‘Lock her up!’: President Trump rallies supporters with Hillary Clinton joke at CPAC
March 3, 2019 by Jerry McCormick
https://www.patriotnewsalerts.com/trump-rallies-supporters-hillary/?
Image Source: Screenshot
President Donald Trump’s appearance at CPAC is quickly becoming a thing of legend.

The crowd at the Conservative Political Action Conference erupted in chants of “Lock her up!” after the president joked about a line he first said in 2016 about Hillary Clinton and the Kremlin.

“I’ve learned, because with the fake news, if you tell a joke, if you’re sarcastic, if you’re having fun with the audience,” Trump said. “If you say something like ‘Russia, please if you can, get us Hillary Clinton’s emails, please, Russia, please, please get us the emails.”

Can’t Joke Around
When Trump said that he cannot say a single word in jest without being slammed by the media, he was not kidding.

Today’s media breaks down every word and every aspect of his body language when he takes the microphone.

Well, he really gave them all something to pick apart when he was giving his speech at CPAC. It sounded more like a Trump rally than it did a conservative convention!

Trump has clearly won over a significant part of conservative America. Will that be enough to win him re-election, though?

Some general polls now have him almost 10 points behind a generic Democrat candidate, but he has fought off bigger odds than that before.

Cohen Lies
Much of the scrutiny Trump currently faces is because of Michael Cohen’s recent public testimony before Congress.

Cohen has taken out this big bag of lies and absolutely shredded Trump.

Those with common sense believe Cohen is continuing to make things up to evoke empathy for his own case, but liberals and Democrats in office are eating it up.

One of Cohen’s tales involved a conversation between Trump and Roger Stone about the WikiLeaks email dump during the campaign.

But Both Stone and Wikileaks have debunked Cohen’s version. Even Robert Mueller has come out against Cohen!

Yet, through it all, people like New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez refuse to even question a single word coming out of Cohen’s mouth.

Get ready for the ride of your life Mr. President, because it is not going to get any easier once election season really kicks in.

CLIMATE? SOCIALISM? Hillary Staffers Say Bernie Demanded PRIVATE JETS Throughout 2016 Campaign
posted by Hannity Staff - 21 hours ago
https://www.hannity.com/media-room/climate-socialism-hillary-staffers-says-bernie-demanded-private-jets-throughout-2016-campaign/
A senior insider with Hillary Clinton’s failed 2016 presidential bid shed new light on the relationship between her campaign and Sen. Bernie Sanders this week; saying the Vermont socialist demanded private jets while stumping for the former Secretary of State.

“I’m not shocked that while thousands of volunteers braved the heat and cold to knock on doors until their fingers bled in a desperate effort to stop Donald Trump, his Royal Majesty King Bernie Sanders would only deign to leave his plush D.C. office or his brand new second home on the lake if he was flown around on a cushy private jet like a billionaire master of the universe,” former Clinton campaign rapid response director Zac Petkanas told Politico.

“We would try to fight it as much as possible because of cost and availability of planes, but they would request [a jet] every time,” another staffer told Politico. “We would always try to push for commercial. … At the campaign, you’re constantly trying to save like 25 cents.”

“In the two years following the presidential election, Sanders continued his frequent private jet travel, spending at least $342,000 on the flights,” adds Politico.

Read the full report at Politico.

Ep. 921 Justice is Dead
by Team Bongino
February 21, 2019
LISTEN 
https://bongino.com/ep-921-justice-is-dead/?utm_source=push&utm_medium=push_notifications&utm_campaign=Justice%20Is%20Dead&utm_content=&utm_term=

In this episode I address the stunning new revelations by an FBI lawyer about the efforts to cover up this Obama/Clinton scandal. I also discuss the efforts by Andrew McCabe to fabricate an obstruction case against President Trump. Finally, I address bizarre comments by Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez about Amazon.

News Picks:

Was there another dirty dossier used to attack the Trump team?
Why can’t Andrew McCabe keep his story straight?
Andrew McCabe continues to conjure up reasons for his witch-hunt investigations.
This key player in the FBI believed Hillary Clinton should have been charged with a crime.
Mike Pompeo shuts the door on the ISIS bride.

Report: FBI coverup over potential Hillary Clinton violations
February 16, 2019 by Jerry McCormick
https://www.patriotnewsalerts.com/fbi-coverup-clinton-violations/?utm_medium=ci&utm_source=push&utm_campaign=pna
NDU Audio Visual / CCL
The FBI under the care of James Comey and Andrew McCabe was a disgraceful institution.

Judicial Watch has just added to what we know about the disaster, reporting that they have uncovered emails discussing a chart of potential violations by Hillary and the reasons NOT to prosecute.

Bias is Clear
In a normal case, it is reasonable to assume if a chart such as this were to be made, it would be the points to be made for prosecution, not against.

However, with Trump-hater Peter Strzok being at the heart of the email chain, it is no wonder the investigative team was looking for reasons NOT to prosecute rather than find guilt when it came to Hillary Clinton.

What is worse, though, is the language makes it seem as though it was quite apparent the individuals had no intention of actually going after Hillary. In fact, they even used the phrase “keep these in his hip pocket.”

Now, if that phrasing does not sound shady, what does?

Reopen the Investigation
If there was ever a case to have this investigation reopened, this is it.

Clearly, the team working on this investigation was more interested in proving or creating a case where Hillary was not guilty rather than simply looking at the facts.

Mueller has been able to carry on his investigation for two years and has yet to uncover a single shred of evidence of actual collusion between Trump and the Russians.

Anyone watching the press conference Comey held is still scratching their head as to how Comey decided not to move forward with the case against Hillary.

Even before we knew all the facts of the investigation, it was clear Comey was protecting Hillary Clinton.

All kinds of legal experts had chimed in at the time that Comey had overstepped his authority by deciding the case against her was not strong enough for a conviction.

With this latest Judicial Watch report, our new Attorney General William Barr would be derelict in his duties if he did not consider opening up a new investigation with unbiased investigators to once and for all find out if Hillary is guilty or not.