If Hillary Goes Down So Will Obama

New documents shed light on FBI response to inquiry about ‘quid pro quo’ for Clinton emails
February 15, 2019
https://www.conservativeinstitute.org/conservative-news/fbi-state-clinton-scandal.htm?utm_source=aimtell&utm_campaign=automated_push&utm_medium=push
New documents shed light on FBI response to inquiry about ‘quid pro quo’ for Clinton emails
Alex Hanson / CCL
Hillary Clinton has just been launched into the news cycle again. More than two years since the FBI exonerated Clinton of misusing her private e-mail server, newly-released documents shed new light on the bureau’s handling of the e-mail probe.

Top FBI officials scrambled to respond to a Fox News inquiry about a potential quid pro quo agreement with Obama’s State Department to change one of Clinton’s emails “from classified to something else,” according to a new batch of Justice Department e-mails obtained by Judicial Watch.

FBI sought quid pro quo with State
Fox initially reported in the weeks before the 2016 election that a quid pro quo was discussed between the FBI and State Department, but new e-mails, released Monday, confirm that the FBI was interested in the arrangement, although it appears it never went through.

The DOJ released the e-mails to Judicial Watch in response to a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit. An October 13, 2016 email sent by former FBI attorney Lisa Page shows that the quid pro quo was discussed by the top brass of the FBI while the bureau was responding to another FOIA request from Judicial Watch.


The State Department requested that the FBI hide the classification status of at least one Clinton e-mail in exchange for more legal attaché positions, Page wrote:

Jason Herring will be providing you with three 302s of current and former FBI employees who were interviewed during the course of the Clinton investigation. These 302s are scheduled to be released to Congress in an unredacted form at the end of the week, and produced (with redactions) pursuant to FOIA at the beginning of next week. As you will see, they describe a discussion about potential quid pro quo arrangement between then-DAD in IOD [deputy assistant director in International Operations Division] and an Undersecretary at the State Department whereby IOD would get more LEGAT [legal attaché] positions if the FBI could change the basis of the FOIA withhold re a Clinton email from classified to something else.

Page’s e-mail was part of a chain prompted by an inquiry about the quid pro quo by Fox journalist Catherine Herridge that October, when Fox originally reported that FBI interview files, called 302s, were released to the House Government Oversight and Intelligence Committees and revealed that Undersecretary for Management Patrick Kennedy was lobbying the FBI to mark a classified e-mail as unclassified in exchange for State department perks.
One of those documents read, “[REDACTED] advised that, in exchange for marking the email unclassified, STATE would reciprocate by allowing the FBI to place more Agents in countries where they are presently forbidden.”

Then-Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) said at the time, “In return for altering the classification, the possibility of additional slots for the FBI at missions overseas was discussed.”

Ready Set HealthNew documents shed light on FBI response to inquiry about ‘quid pro quo’ for Clinton emails
February 15, 2019

New documents shed light on FBI response to inquiry about ‘quid pro quo’ for Clinton emails
Alex Hanson / CCL
Hillary Clinton has just been launched into the news cycle again. More than two years since the FBI exonerated Clinton of misusing her private e-mail server, newly-released documents shed new light on the bureau’s handling of the e-mail probe.

Top FBI officials scrambled to respond to a Fox News inquiry about a potential quid pro quo agreement with Obama’s State Department to change one of Clinton’s emails “from classified to something else,” according to a new batch of Justice Department e-mails obtained by Judicial Watch.

FBI sought quid pro quo with State
Fox initially reported in the weeks before the 2016 election that a quid pro quo was discussed between the FBI and State Department, but new e-mails, released Monday, confirm that the FBI was interested in the arrangement, although it appears it never went through.

The DOJ released the e-mails to Judicial Watch in response to a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit. An October 13, 2016 email sent by former FBI attorney Lisa Page shows that the quid pro quo was discussed by the top brass of the FBI while the bureau was responding to another FOIA request from Judicial Watch.


The State Department requested that the FBI hide the classification status of at least one Clinton e-mail in exchange for more legal attaché positions, Page wrote:

Jason Herring will be providing you with three 302s of current and former FBI employees who were interviewed during the course of the Clinton investigation. These 302s are scheduled to be released to Congress in an unredacted form at the end of the week, and produced (with redactions) pursuant to FOIA at the beginning of next week. As you will see, they describe a discussion about potential quid pro quo arrangement between then-DAD in IOD [deputy assistant director in International Operations Division] and an Undersecretary at the State Department whereby IOD would get more LEGAT [legal attaché] positions if the FBI could change the basis of the FOIA withhold re a Clinton email from classified to something else.

Page’s e-mail was part of a chain prompted by an inquiry about the quid pro quo by Fox journalist Catherine Herridge that October, when Fox originally reported that FBI interview files, called 302s, were released to the House Government Oversight and Intelligence Committees and revealed that Undersecretary for Management Patrick Kennedy was lobbying the FBI to mark a classified e-mail as unclassified in exchange for State department perks.

One of those documents read, “[REDACTED] advised that, in exchange for marking the email unclassified, STATE would reciprocate by allowing the FBI to place more Agents in countries where they are presently forbidden.”

Then-Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) said at the time, “In return for altering the classification, the possibility of additional slots for the FBI at missions overseas was discussed.”

FBI rushed to respond
The e-mails further reveal that top FBI and DOJ brass were looped in as the agencies scrambled to respond to Herridge’s request.

“Here we go. Lisa: where did we end up on how far we would go as to how we addressed the issue? TX M,” wrote the FBI’s then-head of public affairs Michael Kortan to Page.


There appears to have been a sense of urgency as Page e-mailed, called, and texted McCabe to get his OK on the department’s response.

There is no evidence that the quid pro quo went through, but the new e-mails contradict an official statement from the FBI in 2016 which denied that there was any discussion about any such arrangement. The FBI then said that they discussed an already pending request for more overseas positions abroad by coincidence as part of a conversation with the State Department about the classified e-mail, explaining that the FBI had difficulty getting a hold of the official and wanted to discuss the request while they had the opportunity.

“Having been previously unsuccessful in attempts to speak with the senior State official [about the request], during the same conversation, the FBI official asked the State Department official if they would address a pending, unaddressed FBI request for space for additional FBI employees assigned abroad,” the FBI said.

“Following the call, the FBI official consulted with a senior FBI executive responsible for determining the classification of the material and determined the email was in fact appropriately classified at the Secret level. The FBI official subsequently told the senior State official that the email was appropriately classified at the Secret level and that the FBI would not change the classification of the email. The classification of the email was not changed, and it remains classified today. Although there was never a quid pro quo, these allegations were nonetheless referred to the appropriate officials for review.”

Clinton probe weighed on FBI
The newly released e-mails show that Clinton’s e-mail investigation continued to be a concern at the FBI and DOJ even after James Comey cleared Clinton that July.

The quid pro quo was not the only issue related to the Clinton probe that the FBI and DOJ rushed to respond to in the weeks leading up to the election. When Comey re-opened the e-mail probe just weeks before the election on October 28, Clinton lawyer David Kendall demanded a phone call “ASAP” with top brass. His request was apparently satisfied as the FBI rushed to respond with a conference call set up by Peter Strzok, and days later Comey again closed the investigation with no charges against Clinton.

“It is big news that, just days before the presidential election, Hillary Clinton’s personal lawyer pressured the top lawyer for the FBI on the infamous Weiner laptop emails,” said Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton. “These documents further underscore that the fix was in for Hillary Clinton. When will the Justice Department and FBI finally do an honest investigation of the Clinton email scandal?”

Hillary Clinton declares that there is no emergency at the Mexico border
February 10, 2019 by Jerry McCormick
https://www.patriotnewsalerts.com/hillary-clinton-declares-that-there-is-no-emergency-at-the-mexico-border/?
Photo via Youtube Video
Surprise, surprise, Hillary Clinton is against a Trump platform issue.
When asked about the possibility of President Trump declaring a national emergency if an agreement is not in place before February 15, Clinton stated, “There’s no national emergency” on the southern border.
Watch below:_
Hillary Clinton: “There’s No National Emergency At Our Border” | THE CIRCUS | SHOWTIME
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YaVsw1NfYC8&ab_channel=TheCircusonSHOWTIME
What Do You Consider an Emergency?
If Hillary does not think there is an emergency going on at the southern border, one would have to question what qualifies as an emergency to her.

Is a full third of the women making the journey being raped considered an emergency? Is the fact children are being dragged across this terrain without proper medical care or nutrition considered an emergency?

Is the fact far too many of these children and women are actually part of a human trafficking scheme a national emergency? What about the fact gangs such as MS-13 and terrorist groups regularly use immigrant crossings as a way to sneak members into this country?

Democrats will no doubt counter those last two points by saying out of 10,000 immigrants, maybe one or two might be a terrorist. Even if we concede those numbers, we know how problematic just one or two individuals can be.

Less than a dozen individuals killed thousands of Americans during 9/11. And how many people were hurt during the Boston bombing? An attack that was carried out by just two individuals.

Stop the Politics
It was not so long ago Democrats demanded more border security.

The original wall legislation was proposed by Democrats.

Schumer, Obama, and both Hillary and Bill Clinton, among others, are all on video demanding more border security to prevent illegals from entering the United States.

Democrats only started to oppose illegal immigration when Trump used it as an anchor issue on his presidential platform.

If a Democrat were in the White House making the same claims as Trump, you could rest assured Hillary would say this was a national emergency. On this issue, in particular, it is time for Democrats to stop playing politics and actually do what is right to protect ALL Americans.

James Comey says there’s ‘zero chance’ Hillary Clinton will be prosecuted over email scandal
February 6, 2019
https://www.conservativeinstitute.org/conservative-news/comey-zero-chance-clinton.htm?utm_source=aimtell&utm_campaign=automated_push&utm_medium=push
mark reinstein / Shutterstock.com
Former FBI director James Comey said Monday that there’s “zero chance” that Hillary Clinton will ever be prosecuted for her misuse of a private email server.
The Trump foe was speaking at a town hall in Sarasota, FL, where he said that the FBI under his lead had no bias in favor of Clinton, the facts simply didn’t support charges against her.

“There is zero chance, zero chance, on the facts in the Clinton case, that she would be prosecuted,” Comey said.
No evidence
Trump allies have long criticized Comey’s handling of the Clinton email case over his apparently biased and premature decision to exonerate Clinton. Comey authored a draft memo clearing Clinton that pre-dates his July 2016 interview with the former presidential candidate.

Moreover, at least two agents on the case, Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, exchanged vicious anti-Trump text messages that critics say showed bias which may have tainted the probe. But Comey claimed at the Monday town hall event that there was nothing untoward about the bureau’s decision-making under his wing.

“You are out of your mind if you don’t think the FBI wanted to make a case if we could,” Comey said. “The facts weren’t there. Period. Full stop.”
However, Comey’s original draft memo listed evidence of possible felony mishandling of classified information. References to possible criminal wrongdoing were scrubbed by subordinates and the memo was updated to lessen the characterization of the severity of the allegations against Clinton from “grossly negligent” to “extremely careless.”

Despite that finding, Comey ended up publicly exonerating Clinton of any statutory wrongdoing in July 2016, even as he admitted that “this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences.” Comey later made a stunning about-face when his agents discovered another batch of Clinton emails on the laptop of disgraced former New York representative Anthony Weiner, the estranged husband of top Clinton aide Huma Abedin.

Comey briefly reopened the investigation into Clinton’s emails two weeks before election day only to close the inquiry again days before voters went to the polls. Clinton has since blamed Comey, along with Russian trolls and miscellaneous causes, for her election upset.

Deep State
Trump and his allies have accused the Justice Department under Comey of rigging its investigations into Clinton and Trump in favor of the Democrat. While there was apparently nothing unusual about the FBI and DOJ’s decision to not prosecute Clinton, the agencies sought warrants under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) to spy on an unassuming Trump campaign worker, Carter Page, on the basis of an unverified Russian dossier paid for by the Clinton campaign.


Trump has often attacked the Justice Department for not prosecuting Clinton aggressively while going after him and his associates with a political “Witch Hunt” investigation. In August, Trump threatened that he “may have to get involved!” after a report emerged that the FBI glossed over tens of thousands of Clinton’s emails because of a glitch.

Trump has also often attacked Clinton, to whom he has referred as “Crooked Hillary” or even simply “Crooked,” over the email controversy and threatened to appoint a special prosecutor to investigate her at one of their presidential debates. Although Comey said there’s “zero chance” of Clinton facing charges, watchdog groups like Judicial Watch have continued the pursuit and a federal judge recently ruled that Clinton has more questions to answer about the scandal, the Daily Caller reported.

Lamenting his “celebrity”
Trump fired Comey in May 2017, triggering the appointment of Special Counsel Robert Mueller to oversee the investigation of alleged collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign. Comey has claimed that Trump pressured him to make a pledge of loyalty to him, a story he repeated at the town hall.

“An effective leader never asks for loyalty,” Comey said.

The former FBI director — who is known for his petty tweets and pompous, grandiose rhetoric about public service — has been hitting the anti-Trump media circuit for months to trash Trump and promote a memoir about his life, A Higher Loyalty: Truth, Lies, and Leadership. Indeed, Comey has made it a personal mission to criticize Trump, and even told his audience that his former boss is “one of the worst listeners as a leader that I’ve ever seen.”

Comey also made his transformation into a political celebrity sound like something he didn’t really want on Monday. Though he’s not exactly known for keeping his views to himself, Comey said that he would have rather stayed out of the media spotlight, but that he had to answer the call of duty to speak out against Trump in glossy studios and on book tour stops.

“I thought the easiest thing for me to do would be to be quiet,” he said. “I don’t love my life as a semi-employed celebrity, but I would be a coward if I didn’t speak. I’m really worried about the impact this president has on our values that we all have in common.”

Top FBI Lawyer to Congress: Hillary Clinton Should Have Been Charged in Email Scandal
by Team Bongino
January 21, 2019
https://www.theepochtimes.com/transcripts-of-former-top-fbi-lawyer-detail-pervasive-abnormalities-in-trump-probe_2771370.html

Transcripts of former FBI General Counsel James Baker’s October testimony to Congress reveal that he believed Hillary Clinton should have been charged for her “alarming, appalling” mishandling of classified information, according to the Epoch Times.
Baker told Congress he argued with other members of the FBI, including disgraced former director, James Comey about the Clinton investigation.

“My original belief … after having conducted the investigation and towards the end of it, then sitting down and reading a binder of her materials, I thought that it was alarming, appalling, whatever words I said, and argued with others about why they thought she shouldn’t be charged,” he said.

Baker also seemed to take issue with the handling of the Trump-Russia investigation.

The Epoch Times writes:
Confronted with a damning summary of abnormalities, bias, and omissions, which transpired during the investigation, Baker told Congress that the investigation indeed was “highly unusual.”
“I had a jaundiced eye about everything, yes. I had skepticism about all this stuff. I was concerned about all of this. This whole situation was horrible, and it was novel and we were trying to figure out what to do, and it was highly unusual,” Baker told lawmakers.

**LISTEN: Dan breaks down the explosive revelations from Baker’s testimony**

Baker resigned from the FBI in May 2018 and it was recently revealed that he is the subject of a criminal leak investigation.
During his October testimony, Baker’s attorney, Daniel Levin told lawmakers, “You may or may not know, [Baker has] been the subject of a leak investigation … a criminal leak investigation that’s still active at the Justice Department.”
Baker’s congressional testimony made headlines last fall when it was revealed that he believed Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein was “serious” when telling colleagues he wanted to secretly record President Trump.

While Baker himself was not in the room with Rosenstein when he made the comments, two of his associates were: FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe and FBI lawyer, Lisa Page. Both McCabe and Page allegedly took Rosenstein seriously and conveyed that to Baker.

For the full story from the Epoch Times–which includes even more shocking revelations–click here

Hillary Clinton and DNC behind anti-Trump ‘Cohen in Prague’ allegation
JANUARY 8, 2019 BY BEN MARQUIS
https://www.dailychristiannews.com/clinton-dnc-cohen-prague/
If you’ve been following the evolving anti-Trump story surrounding the Steele dossier and alleged Russian collusion by then-candidate Donald Trump’s campaign, you’ve no doubt heard about an alleged visit to Prague in the Czech Republic by former Trump attorney Michael Cohen.

Except, despite the same allegations re-emerging in the media every few months for the past two years, there is still no independent evidence to support it, and the origin of that story has been traced back to the opposition research team hired by the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and then-candidate Hillary Clinton’s campaign in 2016.

The Washington Times just published a sort of timeline of events with regard to the Cohen in Prague tale, which was most recently pushed in an anonymously-sourced McClatchy DC article on Dec. 27. The McClatchy story claimed — but didn’t show — that evidence existed of Cohen’s phone pinging off a cell tower near Prague in 2016.

But no other media outlets have been able to confirm the report’s claims, and “the McClatchy reporters have made it clear that they have no corroborating evidence of their claims and that some of their sources are indirect at best,” the Daily Beast summarized.

The Dec. 27 story was really just an embellished rehash of a similarly anonymously-sourced McClatchy article in April, which in turn had merely been a rehash of the initial claim against Cohen that was included in the Steele dossier. In essence, it claims that Cohen allegedly traveled to Prague in August 2016 to meet with Russian agents and pay them off for hacking and disseminating Democrat emails ahead of the election.

Cohen story originated in Steele dossier
Rewind to the spring of 2016, when the DNC and Clinton campaign — via the law firm Perkins Coie — hired opposition research group Fusion GPS to help dig up dirt against Trump.

Fusion GPS proceeded to contract with former British intelligence agent Christopher Steele, who compiled a collection of questionably-sourced and still unverified memos outlining supposed Trump/Russia collusion throughout 2016 that eventually became known as the Steele dossier.

Elements of the dossier — including the Cohen in Prague claim — had been strategically leaked to media prior to the 2016 election, until Buzzfeed published the entire anti-Trump dossier in Jan. 2017, little more than a week ahead of President Trump’s inauguration.

Repeatedly debunked allegation
Despite the persistence of the Cohen in Prague tale, there is no evidence to support the claim, as opposed to plenty of evidence suggesting it never happened.

Cohen himself has repeatedly denied ever traveling to Prague, his passport shows no stamp for the Czech Republic and he has produced evidence showing he was actually in California at the same time that he was allegedly halfway around the world in Prague.

Making matters worse for those who still cling to the Cohen in Prague claim is that the allegation isn’t mentioned or even hinted at in any of the several legal filings against Cohen as part of the criminal investigations of him by Robert Mueller’s special counsel team or New York prosecutors.

Are you tired of hearing the debunked Cohen in Prague story repeated by the media?
Yes
No
NEXT
Considering the Cohen in Prague claim is a central plank of the entire Trump/Russia collusion narrative, its complete absence in the criminal cases against Cohen is telling, as it would undoubtedly be featured front-and-center as prima facie evidence of alleged collusion … the entire premise of the Mueller investigation in the first place, in case anybody forgot.

Report: Leaked Hillary memo resulted in half a million deaths
January 12, 2019 by Jerry McCormick
Report: Leaked Hillary memo resulted in half a million deaths
Image via K2 images / Shutterstock.com
Hillary Clinton’s actions in the State Department are once again in the spotlight.
https://www.patriotnewsalerts.com/hillary-memo-resulted-in-deaths/?utm_medium=ci&utm_source=push&utm_campaign=pna
As writer Daniel Lazare explains, one particular leaked memo reveals that Hillary’s advice may have ended up costing more than 500,000 people their lives.

Take out Assad
The memo, which became publicly available when Wikileaks published it in 2016, addressed the U.S.’s approach on how to deal with the problems in Syria at the time.

The dates on the memo were off, but according to events Clinton mentioned in the text, it can be reasonably dated to April 2012.

The major focus of the memo was whether or not to use force to oust Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.

According to Clinton, if Assad was taken out, everything else would fall neatly into place.

It worked in Libya, right?
For precedent, she pointed to the similar invention in Libya, which — only a few months after Gaddafi had been ousted — showed “no long-lasting consequences for the region.” (The Libya intervention eventually turned into what Barack Obama later called his “worst mistake.”)

A common refrain throughout the memo was that Hillary Clinton thought all the United States needed to do was flex a little and everything would “fall neatly into place,” as Lazare wrote.

She was wrong.

Tragedy in Syria
The cost for Syria, Lazare writes, was immense and continues to this day.

More than 560,000 people have been killed.

More than half the population has been displaced.

Syria has been decimated, creating hundreds of billions of dollars in damage to the area.

Do You Hold Hillary Clinton Responsible for the United States Still Remaining in Syria?
Yes
No
Next
This is the mess that Trump has been trying to clean up since he took office.

A mess that was literally created by the Obama administration and more specifically, then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

Hillary Clinton declares 2018 a ‘dark time’ in New Year’s Eve Instagram post
January 3, 2019
https://www.conservativeinstitute.org/conservative-news/clinton-2018-dark-time.htm?utm_source=aimtell&utm_campaign=automated_push&utm_medium=push
Hillary Clinton declares 2018 a ‘dark time’ in New Year’s Eve Instagram post
Evan El-Amin / Shutterstock.com
Hillary Clinton bid farewell to 2018 with a message that was about as gloomy as you’d expect from a twice-failed presidential candidate who spent the last two years bitterly complaining about her election loss. In an Instagram post, Clinton called 2018 a “dark time” for the United States and thanked activists and journalists for bringing some “light.” 
 
Her grim, out-of-touch characterization of the country overlooks the historically low unemployment rates for minorities, wage increases and the defeat of ISIS.
 
Clinton out of touch: “dark times”
Clinton shared the New Year’s Eve message in a caption to a throwback photo on her Instagram that showed the family watching fireworks after Bill’s second election victory in 1996. Looking back on another year of political turmoil and “resistance” against the Trump administration, Clinton thanked a saintly group that read like a progressive litany of the elect, including protesters, journalists, activists, and voters who “brought light” to an otherwise depressing year.
 
“In many ways, 2018 was a dark time for our country. As it ends, I’m grateful to everyone who brought light into it: activists who protected kids at the border, journalists who stood up for truth, organizers who mobilized voters for the 2018 elections, candidates who ran races with grit and inspiration, voters who made their voices heard, and absolutely everyone who marched, donated, called, and protested to fight for the values we share,” she wrote.
 
She concluded, “Here’s to more light in 2019, and to a shared commitment to make it as bright as possible. Happy New Year.”
 
Bad year for left, good one for USA
Clinton’s message would have sounded more appropriate in a year that didn’t see a booming economy, the defeat of a barbarous Islamic caliphate, increased jobs for minorities and a peace deal with an unstable dictator that few thought was possible before Trump took office. Clinton and the left only seem to be happy when Trump is losing and the country is miserable and divided.
 
2018 was a bad year for the left and a good year for America. A columnist for the Washington Times called it the “year of the worker.” Despite a stock market wipe, the economy continued to grow and unemployment reached nearly half-century lows of 3.8 percent, with decade-lows for minorities.
 
There are millions more jobs than workers to fill them. After decades of stagnation, wages had their biggest increases in years and millions of workers received bonuses after a Trump tax cut that gave an adrenaline shot to the economy. It’s not surprising that Clinton, who told manufacturing workers that their jobs would never come back, is feeling the blues.
 
On foreign policy, President Trump succeeded where his predecessors failed by getting Kim Jong Un to cool off and promise to destroy his nuclear weapons. The once fearful ISIS caliphate is a smoldering ruin in a corner of the Euphrates Valley.
 
And just before the holidays, Trump followed through on another campaign promise to pull troops out of Syria and Afghanistan. The decision was not well received by Clinton or her friends in the “Swamp,” but it was exactly what the people elected Trump to do.
 
Do you disagree with Hillary Clinton's assessment of 2018?
Yes
No
Next
Hillary 2020?
Clinton’s New Year message echoed the bitter, gloomy tone she’s reflected ever since losing her election. She spent 2018 complaining about her defeat and aligning herself further with the progressive left at speaking engagements and in interviews, even encouraging her followers to abandon civility at one point. Many speculate that she is contemplating a presidential run in 2020.
 
Clinton has said that she would still like to be president and she has not ruled out the possibility of running. “It’s somewhere between highly unlikely and zero,” longtime Clinton aide Philippe Reines told Politico in October, “but it’s not zero.”
 
If she does run, she could be overshadowed by newcomers like Texas Democrat Beto O’Rourke — and she’ll face plenty of push-back from progressives who haven’t gotten over her epic blow-out in 2016. But it looks like Clinton is doing her utmost to pander to the “resistance.”
 
Apparently, Clinton thinks it’s “dark” when the president fights for the country and only finds glimmers of hope when activists stand up for illegal immigrants instead. It’s not surprising to see Clinton lamenting the state of the country when it’s doing great without her, but that’s just another reason to be glad that she’s not in charge.

Hillary Clinton loses position as America’s ‘most admired woman’
December 28, 2018 by Jerry McCormick
https://www.patriotnewsalerts.com/americas-most-admired-woman/?utm_medium=ci&utm_source=push&utm_campaign=pna
Photo via The American Mirror Youtube Video
Hillary Clinton has finally been removed from her mantle as the “most admired woman” in America.

She has been replaced at the top of the list by Michelle Obama.

Most-Admired Woman
This poll has been conducted for more than seven decades.

Each year, Gallup asks Americans which man and which woman they most admire in this country.

In recent years, Hillary Clinton has been atop that list.

Despite her legal problems, despite the fact she was responsible for four deaths in Benghazi, and despite her email scandal, Americans have voted for her.

Second on that list was usually former First Lady Michelle Obama.

But this year, Mrs. Obama overtook the former secretary of State to become America’s most admired woman.

So Much for Standards
Other women who earned top spots on the list included Oprah Winfrey and Ellen DeGeneres.

But even these giveaway-giving women couldn’t overcome Michelle Obama, who — by the way — seems to be on a campaign of demeaning other world leaders, including other women.

We shouldn’t be surprised, though.

Hillary Clinton won the prize even at the height of the controversies surrounding her.

Meanwhile, our current first lady, Melania Trump, has done amazing things for children over her two years in the White House, but to no avail.

Indeed, 15 percent of Americans chose Michelle Obama over Mrs. Trump.

And not so surprisingly, Barack Obama was voted the man most admired by Americans.

Do you admire Melania Trump?
Yes
No
Next
These respondents should look and see who has really helped improve their lives before voting next year.

If they do, we’ll probably find Mr. and Mrs. Trump on the top of the list.

But we aren’t holding our breath.

Poll: Hillary Clinton holds ‘highest unfavorable score’ among Dems’ potential 2020 contenders
December 20, 2018

https://www.conservativeinstitute.org/conservative-news/hillary-highest-unfavorable-score.htm?utm_source=aimtell&utm_campaign=automated_push&utm_medium=push
Image Source: Video Screenshot
Twice-failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton refuses to count herself out of the 2020 election, even admitting in an October interview that she’d “like to be president.” But as a Quinnipiac University Poll published on Wednesday demonstrates, Clinton is definitely speaking for herself when she imagines herself in the White House. 

When it comes to public disapproval ratings, Clinton leads the pack in a survey of top Democratic presidential contenders, with nearly two-thirds of registered voters expressing distaste for the aspiring president.

Leading the pack
“Former Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton has the highest unfavorable score on the list, a negative 32 [to] 61 percent favorability,” the independent pollster explained in a Dec. 19 press release.

Quinnipiac has been tracking Clinton’s popularity since at least July 2015, and the latest findings represent a record low-point for the former secretary of State. Registered Republicans find Clinton especially off-putting, with 93 percent of these respondents harboring negative views of the New York Democrat.

Demographically, Clinton polls the worst among voters aged 35 to 49, and 77 percent of white men from any political disposition hold unfavorable views of her. These numbers reflect Clinton’s struggles on the campaign trail, where she failed to motivate the same groups in several critical Midwestern swing states.

Man-hater
If Clinton hopes to rehabilitate her image and improve her standing among male voters, she is doing an abysmal job of it. Stumbling and mumbling her way through India in March, Clinton blamed men for forcing their wives to vote for Trump in 2016.

“We do not do well with white men and we don’t do well with married, white women,” Clinton told a star-struck audience in Mumbai. “And part of that is an identification with the Republican Party, and a sort of ongoing pressure to vote the way that your husband, your boss, your son, whoever, believes you should.”

The former first lady loves to remind people that she took home the consolation prize in 2016 by winning the popular vote. She even monetized these endless reminders by turning her exhaustive list of excuses for losing to President Donald Trump into a blame-all book tour.

But it doesn’t take a doctorate degree in political science to understand why Clinton is so universally despised. Rather than acknowledge the multitude of faults that plagued her misguided campaign, Clinton chose to project her failings onto the electorate while blaming everyone from domineering husbands and ignorant voters to Russia, the FBI, and even the Electoral College.   

Mean-streak
Moreover, anyone who ventures to reason that Clinton’s vindictive animosity would have subsided by now is sorely mistaken. During former President George H.W. Bush’s solemn funeral service earlier this month, the habitual campaign failure couldn’t even muster the dignity to acknowledge President Trump and First Lady Melania Trump, who were seated nearby.

And Clinton isn’t the only veteran Democratic politician who just won’t go away. Former Vice President Joe Biden commanded the highest favorability in the same Quinnipiac poll, with 53 percent of Americans saying that they view Biden favorably.

Rep. Beto O’Rourke (D-TX), who lost big to Ted Cruz in his state’s Senate race in November, was recognized in the same poll for his public insignificance, with 55 percent of respondents admitting that they “haven’t heard enough about” the Hollywood favorite.

Would you like to see Hillary Clinton retire from public life?
Yes
No
Next
With any luck, Clinton will refuse to slink away into retirement and face the music in 2020, turning a second term for President Trump into a sure thing. But based on her potential replacements on the campaign trail, the Republican president’s chances are looking good all around.

Hillary Clinton writes letter to little girl who lost class president election to a boy
December 16, 2018 by Jerry McCormick
https://www.patriotnewsalerts.com/hillary-clinton-writes-letter/?utm_medium=ci&utm_source=push&utm_campaign=pna
Photo via The Late Show Youtube Video
Hillary Clinton is once again trying to create a divide — but this time, it is at a grade school.

After hearing about a little girl that lost a class election to a boy, Clinton penned a letter to console the girl, writing: “As I know too well, it’s not easy when you stand up and put yourself in contention for a role that’s only been sought by boys.”

What?!
To have a high-profile politician pay attention to your class election and send you a letter has to be the experience of a lifetime for a child.

Indeed, this could have been such a positive experience for everyone all the way around — but even on this case, Hillary had an agenda.

Hillary is now a confirmed a man-hater, but who can really blame her?

(Her husband isn’t exactly a stand-up guy.)

That was hardly the tone that should have been taken with this little girl, though.

Are you glad Hillary Clinton lost in 2016?
Yes
No
Next
Creating Divide
Instead of building this girl up and saluting her for her accomplishment in running a great campaign (and only falling one vote short), Hillary managed to pit girls against the boys in a situation where it was not warranted.

It is quite apparent that Hillary is still very bitter about losing to Trump and failing to become the first female president in the history of our country.

We hate to break it to you Hillary, but you losing had nothing at all to do with you being a woman.

It was more about your character and the fact that nobody trusted you to have the best interests of Americans in mind.

We were also a little worried about the wares in the White House, considering that you and Bill walked out with a truck full of them last time you lived there. (Just saying.)




BREAKING: Hillary's Latest Meltdown Caught on Camera

[Show Any Liberal This Disturbing Footage -- Watch Their Face at 0:27!]
https://pro.hsicures.com/p/HSI180214A/LHSIUC79/?h=true
https://pro.hsicures.com/p/HSI180214A/LHSIUC79/?h=true 


A Washington insider just posted this brand new footage of Hillary after Trump's Inauguration... and I have to warn you: it's downright disturbing.

It turns out Hillary wasn't done scheming the day Trump took his oath. In fact, this intense meltdown is living proof she has cruel plans for him…

Plans that could have devastating consequences for all of us. Full Story Here.

-Kelly
 
[Click here for the GRAPHIC footage.]
https://pro.hsicures.com/p/HSI180214A/LHSIUC79/?h=true

Clinton Foundation CFO: ‘I know where all the bodies are buried’
December 8, 2018 by Jerry McCormick
https://www.patriotnewsalerts.com/clinton-foundation-cfo/?utm_medium=ci&utm_source=push&utm_campaign=pna
Image via K2 images / Shutterstock.com
A meeting between an investigator and a high-ranking Clinton official may have just turned the tide against Bill and Hillary Clinton.

Andrew Kessel, the CFO of the Clinton Foundation, stunned an MDA Analytics investigator, reportedly stating, “I know where all the bodies are buried in this place.” The “bodies” to which Kessel was referring are apparently the evidence of unscrupulous accounting and spending by the Clinton Foundation.

Kessel’s statement was recorded in a memo from an interview in November 2016, a memo which is part of hundreds of pages of evidence collected by MDA Analytics LLC, reports the Hill’s John Solomon.

Taking Down the Clintons
MDA says it was created for one purpose and one purpose only… to investigate the wrongdoings of charities like the Clinton Foundation.

The idea is that if wrongdoing was found, MDA would be rewarded with a portion of any tax dollars recovered by the government against the Clinton Foundation.

Without knowing the foundation was under investigation, Kessel had sat down with someone he believed was trying to work with the foundation.

Kessel allegedly made some incriminating statements about the foundation, specifically the out of control spending habits of Bill Clinton.

According to the report, Bill regularly spent Clinton Foundation funds as though they were his own, combining personal and professional expenses.

According to an MDA memo, Solomon reports, Kessel allegedly said, “There is no controlling Bill Clinton. He does whatever he wants and runs up incredible expenses with foundation funds.”

Denials
The Clinton Foundation is already trying to cover its tracks.

It is claiming Kessel was misled and that he never actually made the statements MDA is claiming he made.

A foundation spokesperson stated, “Mr. Kessel believed he was meeting an old professional acquaintance who was looking for business from the foundation.”

The denial is holding little water right now, though, as there are other facts to back up the alleged statements made to MDA.

In 2008, the Clinton Foundation actually conducted an internal investigation which also happened to uncover the same practices described by Kessel to the MDA investigator.

The attorney hired to conduct the investigation, Kumiki Gibson, expressed concerns over the same commingling of personal and foundation expenses by the Clintons.
Do You Think the Clintons Will Ever Be Brought to Justice?
Yes
No
Next

This report does not bode well at all for Bill and Hillary.
Trump’s nominee for Attorney General, Bill Barr, seems like someone who might be willing to investigate the Clintons.
https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/12/william-barr-attorney-general-nominee-excellent-choice/

And a House committee is preparing for a hearing next week to look into the Clinton Foundation’s shady financial practices and allegations of quid-pro-quo against Hillary Clinton.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/clinton-foundation-whistleblowers-have-come-forward-with-hundreds-of-pages-of-evidence-meadows-says
Could this finally be the beginning of the end for the most corrupt couple in our country’s history?

JOIN THE MOVEMENT.
Add your best email address below to start receiving Patriot News Alerts.

Enter your email address.
 Sign Up

Written by 
Jerry McCormick 
An accomplished writer for Patriot News Alerts.

Latest News
Millennials are causing the divorce rate to drop

Trump says his lawyers are already 87-pages deep into their response to Mueller

Report: Chelsea Clinton and Ivanka Trump are no longer friends

Clinton Foundation CFO: ‘I know where all the bodies are buried’

Fox News’ Janice Dean suggests canceling Oscars: ‘Would anyone really miss it?’

December 7, 2018
FBI raid on Clinton Foundation whistleblower draws bipartisan condemnation
Hillary for America / CCL
A Clinton Foundation whistleblower is receiving bipartisan support after the FBI raided his office last month despite legal protection. 
https://www.conservativeinstitute.org/crime-criminal-justice/crime-stories/fbi-raid-clinton-whistleblower.htm?utm_source=aimtell&utm_campaign=automated_push&utm_medium=push
The home of ex-FBI contractor Dennis Cain was searched after he shared documents alleging misdeeds by the Clintons and their philanthropy with Inspector General Michael Horowitz, who passed the files along to Congress.

Cain reportedly has dirt on the Uranium One deal, the foundation, and former secretary of state Hillary Clinton. Republican lawmakers are demanding answers from the Justice Department about the raid.

Dems, GOP condemn FBI raid on whistleblower
The Daily Caller broke the story last month that 16 feds kicked in the door of Cain’s Maryland home on Nov. 19. The agents rifled through Cain’s personal belongings for six hours despite protection granted him by Horowitz, who had already passed along the files to the House and Senate Intelligence Committees over the summer, lawyer Michael Soccaras said.

The documents showed that the Justice Department failed to investigate possible wrongdoing involving Hillary Clinton and the Clinton Foundation, and that then-FBI Director Robert Mueller did not investigate possible crimes involving the Russian company Rosatom that bought the Canadian mining company Uranium One, according to a document that the Daily Caller reviewed.

But liberal and conservative lawyers and watchdog groups told the Daily Caller that Cain was following federal whistleblower law and questioned whether the raid was necessary, legal, or even constitutional.

“This isn’t how we should be treating whistleblowers who are coming forward with information about high-level wrongdoing,” Nick Schwellenbach, the investigations director for independent watchdog group the Project on Government Oversight, told the Daily Caller. “It sends a very strong message that you will be treated as a criminal even though what you’re trying to do is expose crime or a potential crime.”

“Extremely troublesome” actions
Former Attorney General Jeff Sessions first asked U.S. Attorney John Huber to open an investigation of alleged conflicts of interest involving the Clinton Foundation last year. The foundation has been accused of arranging “pay to play” schemes like that involving Uranium One, which was sold to a Russian company as the foundation received millions in donations from Russian entities with a stake in the sale, and while Hillary Clinton was sitting on the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, which approves foreign business deals with national security implications.

Apparently hoping to find information on this, federal magistrate Stephanie A. Gallagher issued a court order last month for the raid, but relevant documents have not been made available to reporters. However, several lawyers have expressed concern that the Justice Department was dishonest about Cain’s status as a whistleblower when asking for a warrant and said that the documents justifying the raid should be released.

“If they did not fully advise the court of his whistleblower status, then I would find that to be extremely troublesome,” said Cleta Mitchell, a conservative attorney who specializes in ethics law. “The main question is whether or not they properly informed the court that this individual is a whistleblower and that he had gone through the procedures to receive whistleblower status.”

Stuart Baggish, a Texas defense lawyer, noted that the search could be a violation of the Fourth Amendment, which protects against unreasonable search and seizure, arguing:

If the search warrant for Mr. Cain’s property was based on an affidavit that purposely or recklessly omitted his whistleblower status, like my client’s case against the Smith County Sheriff [in Texas], the search could be ruled unreasonable and hence a Fourth Amendment violation.

Continuing support
Cain has also received backing from Republican Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA), who asked in a Nov. 30 letter to the FBI whether they knew about Cain’s whistleblower status before raiding his house. Grassley, who gave the FBI a deadline of Dec. 12, also asked FBI Director Christopher Wray to explain whether the bureau knew that Cain already handed over documents to Horowitz and whether they took other documents during the search.

He asked Horowitz to provide updates on “the FBI’s treatment of Mr. Cain’s disclosures.”

Do you believe that the Clinton Foundation engaged in unethical or illegal dealings?
Yes
No
Next
The raid comes as Rep. Mark Meadows (R-NC) claims that three whistleblowers have handed him “hundreds” of pages of evidence of wrongdoing by the foundation, including alleged quid-pro-quo schemes with donors when Clinton was Secretary of State.

Meadows, leader of the House Freedom Caucus and chairman of the House Oversight Subcommittee on Government Operations, is set to lead a hearing next week about the investigation into the foundation.

https://bongino.com/federal-judge-opens-discovery-into-clinton-private-email-system/
Federal Judge Opens Discovery into Clinton Private Email System
by Team Bongino
December 7, 2018
TwitterFacebookEmailLinkedInRedditPrintShare


A federal judge has ruled that the U.S. State Department and Department of Justice must submit a schedule for discovery into Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server and whether the State Department acted in “bad faith” for failing to disclose knowledge of the server, according to Judicial Watch.
U.S. District Court Judge Royce C. Lamberth called Clinton’s use of a private email system, “one of the gravest modern offenses to government transparency,” and ruled:


… the Court ORDERS the parties to meet and confer to plan discovery into (a) whether Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email while Secretary of State was an intentional attempt to evade FOIA; (b) whether the State Department’s attempts to settle this case in late 2014 and early 2015 amounted to bad faith; and (c) whether State has adequately searched for records responsive to Judicial Watch’s requests.


Lamberth also slammed the Obama State and Justice Departments, saying they “fell far short:”


… his [President Barack Obama’s] State and Justice Departments fell far short. So far short that the court questions, even now, whether they are acting in good faith. Did Hillary Clinton use her private email as Secretary of State to thwart this lofty goal [Obama announced standard for transparency]? Was the State Department’s attempt to settle this FOIA case in 2014 an effort to avoid searching – and disclosing the existence of – Clinton’s missing emails? And has State ever adequately searched for records in this case?
…At best, State’s attempt to pass-off its deficient search as legally adequate during settlement negotiations was negligence born out of incompetence. At worst, career employees in the State and Justice Departments colluded to scuttle public scrutiny of Clinton, skirt FOIA, and hoodwink this Court.
The judge also said the current Department of Justice “made things worse:”


The current Justice Department made things worse. When the government last appeared before the Court, counsel claimed, ‘it is not true to say we misled either Judicial Watch or the Court.’ When accused of ‘doublespeak,’ counsel denied vehemently, feigned offense, and averred complete candor. When asked why State masked the inadequacy of its initial search, counsel claimed that the officials who initially responded to Judicial Watch’s request didn’t realize Clinton’s emails were missing, and that it took them two months to ‘figure [] out what was going on’… Counsel’s responses strain credulity. [citations omitted]


Discovery was granted because the judge believes the government’s response to Judicial Watch’s Benghazi FOIA request “smacks of outrageous conduct.”
Lamberth cited an email discovered from Judicial Watch’s lawsuit in which Clinton acknowledged Benghazi was a terrorist attack immediately after it happened and asked, “Did State know Clinton deemed the Benghazi attack terrorism hours after it happened, contradicting the Obama Administration’s subsequent claim of a protest-gone-awry?”
Lamberth’s questions continued: 


Did the Department merely fear what might be found? Or was State’s bungling just the unfortunate result of bureaucratic redtape and a failure to communicate? To preserve the Department’s integrity, and to reassure the American people their government remains committed to transparency and the rule of law, this suspicion cannot be allowed to fester.


Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton called the court ruling “historic” and says it “raises concerns about the Hillary Clinton email scandal and government corruption that millions of Americans share.”


“Judicial Watch looks forward to conducting careful discovery into the Clinton email issue and we hope the Justice Department and State Department recognize Judge Lamberth’s criticism and help, rather than obstruct, this court-ordered discovery,” he said.
VIDEO BREAKING NEWS ON CLINTON EMAIL SCANDAL--Federal Judge Opens Discovery Into Clinton Email Usage
22,526 views
Judicial Watch
Published on 6 Dec 2018
READ THE FULL STORY: http://jwatch.us/7QXHHT
 
Judicial Watch announced today that, in a ruling excoriating both the U.S. Departments of State and Justice, U.S. District Court Judge Royce C. Lamberth has ordered both agencies to join Judicial Watch in submitting a proposed schedule for discovery into whether Hillary Clinton sought to evade the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) by using a private email system and whether the State Department acted in “bad faith” by failing to disclose knowledge of the email system.


Stay tuned for more updates...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=11&v=DtyejLE0Drc&ab_channel=JudicialWatch

Popup said: Clinton Enemy dead.
https://www.patriotnewsalerts.com/robert-mcnair-dies/?utm_medium=ci&utm_source=push&utm_campaign=pna
Texans owner and GOP contributor Robert McNair dies at age 81
November 28, 2018 by Jerry McCormick
Texans owner and GOP contributor Robert McNair dies at age 81
Image via K2 images / Shutterstock.com
The NFL truly lost one of the good guys this past week.

Houston Texans owner and longtime GOP backer Robert McNair passed away at the age of 81.

Brilliant Legacy
McNair has been battling leukemia and squamous cell carcinoma for years.

On Friday, that fight came to a sad conclusion.

McNair left behind a magnificent legacy that will not soon be forgotten.

In 1996, Houston lost its beloved football team and the city was in complete despair.

Then, in 1998, McNair took to the first steps in rectifying that situation by forming Houston NFL Holdings.

In 1999, the NFL awarded Mr. McNair its 32nd NFL franchise, which was set to begin play in 2002.

McNair’s team president, Jamey Rootes, said McNair “was the reason professional football returned to Houston and he [led] our franchise with a laser focus on honesty, integrity, and high character.”

Rootes added: “He was an amazing champion for Houston and worked hard to make sure our city received maximum value from the presence of the Texans and the NFL.”

GOP Backer
McNair made a major splash in the political world during the 2012 presidential election.

In this years leading up to the election, it was reported that McNair had donated more than $3 million to Republicans.

Much of that money was earmarked for super PACs backing Mitt Romney.

McNair made no secret about his political affiliations, either.

He once stated: “I support candidates that support the free-enterprise system and believe in free trade. Most of the people who support those policies are people in the Republican Party.”

Democrats in Texas were so opposed to his politics that Texas Monthly published a scathing article about the NFL owner in October 2015 warning fans spending money at Texans games was like putting money directly into the pockets of Republicans.

That same publication published nothing in kind of big money donors to the Democrat party.

This was an early sign that liberals were losing their marbles and demonizing conservatives at all costs.

Did You Know McNair Was Such a Huge Backer of the GOP?
Yes
No
Next
Regardless of how Texas Monthly feels, though, most Texans believe they truly lost one of the good guys last week.

Rest in peace, Mr. McNair. You will be missed.

https://www.patriotnewsalerts.com/clinton-foundation-donations-drop/?utm_medium=ci&utm_source=push&utm_campaign=pna
Clinton Foundation donations drop by almost 60 percent amid federal investigation
November 28, 2018 by Jerry McCormick
Clinton Foundation donations drop by almost 60 percent amid federal investigation
Image via a katz / Shutterstock.com
Since Hillary Clinton lost in 2016, donations for her family’s very questionable charity are significantly down.

All of this is happening as the Justice Department conducts its own investigation into the Clinton Foundation for improper activity.

Even President Donald Trump chimed in, hinting that the Clintons were involved in peddling political influence.

Bad Days Ahead
While Barack Obama was in office, Hillary Clinton had a gold-plated Get-Out-Of-Jail-Free card.

But during his 2016 campaign, Donald Trump promised the American people that Clinton would be brought to justice.

That day may soon be approaching with this current investigation.

The release of tax documents has both the Justice Department and the American people asking some very serious questions about the activity at the Clinton Foundation.

President Trump also has a few questions of his own:

Donald J. Trump

@realDonaldTrump
 Clinton Foundation donations drop 42% - which shows that they illegally played the power game. They monetized their political influence through the Foundation. “During her tenure the State Department was put in the service of the Clinton Foundation.”  Andrew McCarthy

121K
8:39 PM - Nov 25, 2018
Twitter Ads info and privacy
65.3K people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy
While making his point, President Trump apparently got his figures a little mixed up. (In 2017, the Clinton Foundation only received $26.6 million in donations, which is 42.2 percent of the 2016 total of $62.9 million.)

Either way, with Obama no longer in office and Clinton no longer involved with our government, donors clearly no longer see the need to donate to the “charity.”

Pay-to-Play
And Trump is not alone in his assumption. Several high-ranking Republicans have brought their concerns to light as well.

Rep. Mark Meadows (R-NC) said the sudden drop in donations “raises grave concerns their operations were not above board.”

While the investigation started back in January, the Justice Department expects to hold hearings on the Clinton Foundation in early December.

Do you think the Clinton Foundation has been dishonest in its dealings?
Yes
No
Next
If the allegations end up being true, any momentum Democrats had from midterm elections will quickly be lost.

Their so-called “Blue Wave” will quickly be put down, and Republicans will no doubt use this to shred Democrats once the 2020 campaign season kicks in.

We can’t wait.

MEET THE CLINTONS: Bill and Hillary Play to Half Empty Arena, Tickets for as Low as $6.55
posted by Hannity Staff - 16 hours ago
Bill and Hillary Clinton kicked-off their multi-city world tour in Toronto Wednesday night, speaking to a “half empty” arena and discussing a wide range of issues including climate change, America’s “compromised” leadership under President Trump, and more.

According to the Daily Mail, tickets were going for just $6.55 moments before the duo took the stage.
“Bill and Hillary Clinton launched their 13-city paid speaking tour in a Canadian hockey arena Tuesday evening, where there were banks of empty seats and the power couple accused President Trump of joining a Saudi ‘cover-up,’” writes the Daily Mail.

Hillary Clinton suffers massive coughing fit during first tour stop
The former Secretary of State suffered a ‘major coughing fit’ at one point of the interview, prompting the top Obama official to put down her microphone and reach for water.

Read the full story here. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6436001/Bill-Hillary-kick-13-city-Evening-Clintons-paid-speaking-tour-CANADA.html

https://bongino.com/hillary-clinton-issues-scathing-attack-on-fox-news/
Hillary Clinton Issues Scathing Attack on Fox News
by Team Bongino
November 23, 2018
TwitterFacebookEmailLinkedInRedditPrintShare
Hillary Clinton blasted Fox News in an interview with the Guardian published Friday, calling the network “superb propaganda” and mocking its news coverage.
“You watch Fox News, it’s always, ‘Something terrible is about to happen’, ‘Something terrible did happen’, ‘These people are doing all these awful things’. It is totally divorced from reality, but it is superb propaganda, she said. “I don’t know the best way to puncture that. You have to hope that reality catches up with politics and entertainment at some point.”

She also called number one-rated news network a “wholly owned subsidiary of Trump and the Republican Party.”

Citing research on fascism by former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, Clinton said “various populist, rightwing, fascist, authoritarian movements and leaders destroy a common base of fact and evidence, creating an ‘alternative reality’.”

“One of the ways you do that is by consistently attacking the press,” said the former Democratic presidential candidate.
“Now [Trump] doesn’t attack Fox News, because they’re like a wholly owned subsidiary of Trump and the Republican party now. So he attacks the press and the broadcast media that raise questions about him, that don’t give him fidelity and loyalty,” she said.


https://www.patriotnewsalerts.com/cardi-cut-your-veins/?utm_medium=ci&utm_source=push&utm_campaign=pna
Rapper Cardi B tells haters to ‘cut your veins’
November 23, 2018 by Jerry McCormick
Rapper Cardi B tells haters to ‘cut your veins’
wellphoto / Shutterstock.com
One of Hillary Clinton’s liberal entertainer buddies is getting ripped on social media for suggesting her trolls should kill themselves.
Rapper Cardi B and fellow artist Nicki Minaj — and their fans — have been engaged in a very public feud for months. Apparently infuriated by Minaj fans who were razzing her younger sister online, Cardi B lost it, telling them to “Throw yourself off a $!@@ balcony.”
Sticking with the suicide theme, she also said on Instagram Live, “You need to cut your $#@! veins. You people need help.”
Funny, Cardi B tells people they need help, yet she is the one publishing dark threats against the very people she is criticizing.
The Backlash
It did not take long for social media to react after Cardi B sent out her horrific message.
Dozens of followers immediately called her out for her comments.
Twitter user @LOSINGGRlP said, “Cardi B encouraging suicide and self harm… disgusting behaviour from someone with such a large sphere of influence”
daniel
@LOSINGGRlP
 Cardi B encouraging suicide and self harm... disgusting behaviour from someone with such a large sphere of influence
11
6:30 PM - Oct 28, 2018
Twitter Ads info and privacy
See daniel's other Tweets
Twitter Ads info and privacy
Twitte user @korrinator wrote, “does it matter if they were being serious or not? like truly? jokes still hurt people. every day. it takes one suicide “joke” to push somebody over the edge. cardi has a huge following, u don’t think anybody’s gonna hear that and think “ya know what? maybe i should””
korri but jollier

Are Clinton Foundation Whistleblowers About to Speak Out?
by Team Bongino
November 21, 2018
https://bongino.com/are-clinton-foundation-whistleblowers-about-to-speak-out/?utm=hpush

Freedom Caucus chairman Rep. Mark Meadows (R-N.C.) told the Hill that there are whistleblowers who could have damaging information about the Clinton Foundation and that he hopes to secure their testimonies for an upcoming House Oversight Committee hearing.
Meadows’ revelation came Tuesday after he told Hill.Tv’s “Rising” that he is planning on holding a hearing on Dec. 5 with Attorney John Huber, who was appointed by then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions to investigate the Clinton Foundation and allegations of FBI misconduct. 

“Mr. Huber with the Department of Justice and FBI has been having an investigation — at least part of his task was to look at the Clinton Foundation and what may or may not have happened as it relates to improper activity with that charitable foundation..,” he said.

Meadows said his committee is working on getting testimonies from whistleblowers who “would indicate that there is a great probability of significant improper activity that’s happening in and around the Clinton Foundation.”

**LISTEN: Dan talks about the upcoming hearing with Huber and the real Clinton scandal**
The Hill reports that “Meadows…said the committee plans to delve into a number of Republicans concerns surrounding the foundation, including whether any tax-exempt proceeds were used for personal gain and whether the foundation complied with IRS laws.”
The Clinton Foundation has a long history of troubling dealings, many of which are outlined in the bestselling book by Peter Schweizer, Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich.

Consider the below list as a small example of some of the questionable behavior of the Clinton Foundation as laid out by Breitbart:

Hillary’s Foundation Hid a $2.35 Million Foreign Donation from the Head of the Russian Govt’s Uranium Company that Had Business Before Hillary Clinton’s State Dept.—a Clear Violation of the Memorandum of Understanding with the Obama Administration
Bill Clinton Bagged $500,000 for a Speech in Moscow Paid for by a Kremlin-linked Bank
Hillary’s Brother Sits on the Board of a Mining Company that Scored an Extremely Rare “Gold Exploitation Permit” in Haiti as Hillary and Bill Clinton Disbursed Billions of U.S. Taxpayer Dollars in Haiti
Hillary’s Approval of the Russian Takeover of Uranium One Transferred 20% of All U.S. Uranium to the Russian Govt.
At Least $26 Million of the Clintons’ Wealth Comes from Speaking Fees by Companies and Organizations that are Also Major Clinton Foundation Donors

https://www.hannity.com/media-room/day-of-reckoning-house-committee-subpoenas-comey-lynch-over-botched-hillary-probe/?utm=pushnami
DAY OF RECKONING: House Committee Subpoenas Comey, Lynch over Botched Hillary Probe
posted by Hannity Staff - 9 hours ago
Outgoing Rep. Trey Gowdy unloaded on former FBI chief James Comey Monday; blasting the disgraced bureau boss over his demands for a “public hearing” regarding his botched investigation into Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server.
 
“House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.) notified colleagues last week that he will subpoena Comey for a closed-door deposition Nov. 29 and Lynch for Dec. 5, as part of the investigation into the FBI and DOJ’s handling of the Hillary Clinton email probe and the Russia investigation,” writes Fox News.
“House Republicans can ask me anything they want but I want the American people to watch, so let’s have a public hearing. Truth is best served by transparency. Let me know when is convenient,” responded Comey.
James Comey
?
@Comey
 House Republicans can ask me anything they want but I want the American people to watch, so let’s have a public hearing. Truth is best served by transparency.  Let me know when is convenient.
 
133K
11:43 PM - Nov 16, 2018
Twitter Ads info and privacy
37.6K people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy
“Did he interview Hillary Clinton in public? Did he interview George Papadopoulos in public? Did he interview Michael Flynn in public? Did he interview Huma Abedin, Cheryl Mills — has the FBI ever conducted an interview in public? And has the FBI ever conducted an interview where you’re limited to five minutes, which is what happens in congressional hearings?” Gowdy fired-back. 
http://insider.foxnews.com/2018/11/19/trey-gowdy-james-comey-calling-public-hearing-congress-lack-transparency-former-fbi-chief
Gowdy Rips Comey's Request for Public Hearing: 'Did He Interview Hillary Clinton in Public?' VIDEO

Report: Masterminds who assassinated famous anti-Clinton journalist in car bomb explosion have been identified
November 18, 2018 by Jerry McCormick
https://www.patriotnewsalerts.com/masterminds-assassinated-journalist-identified/?utm_medium=ci&utm_source=push&utm_campaign=pna
Image via Foreign and Commonwealth Office / CCL
In October 2017, journalist Daphne Caruana Galizia was killed via a car bomb, which led to some rather horrific comments from Hillary Clinton, who Galizia had been critical of during her career.

As it turns out, Galizia actually had ties to anti-Hillary documents — and her killers have reportedly been identified as “more than two” Maltese nationals.

Ties to Clinton
Galizia was the journalist that published the Panama Papers linked to Clinton.

The papers exposed corruption in Malta while also implicating several members of the Obama administration, including Hillary Clinton.

When Galizia was killed, it spurred Clinton to make the comment that she had hoped President Donald Trump had not started to order the deaths of journalists.

She was trying to use Trump’s war with the media to cover the fact the death of this particular journalist benefited her significantly.

Once described as a “one-woman Wikileaks,” Galizia’s information brought yet another scandal to the scandal-free administration of Barack Obama.

The Investigation
While it has taken more than year, authorities now believe they are dialed in to who carried out the attack against Galizia.

A recent report from the Times of Malta claims the car bombing has now been tied into two or more Maltese nationals.

Nothing is official yet, and the family, according to reports, has yet to be notified of these findings.

One source stated: “We have a large amount of data that requires analyzing and partners like Europol have the necessary experience and expertise to help facilitate this process.”

The three individuals believed to be linked to the attack are Alfred Degiorgio, George Degiorgio, and Vincent Muscat.

Do You Think Hillary Had Something To Do with Galizia’s Death?
Yes
No
Next
All three of them have been in custody since December of last year.

So far, all three men have claimed their innocence, but investigators are hopeful with the help of Europol, this case will be cracked wide open very soon.

https://www.patriotnewsalerts.com/lindsey-graham-pledges-investigate/?utm_source=dc&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=dc-1
Lindsey Graham pledges to investigate Hillary Clinton email matter if tapped to head Senate Judiciary Committee
November 15, 2018 by Ben Baird
Lindsey Graham pledges to investigate Hillary Clinton email matter if tapped to head Senate Judiciary Committee
JStone / Shutterstock.com
President Donald Trump could use some allies in the Senate after Democrats took the House of Representatives this month and promised to unleash a “subpoena cannon” on the Trump administration.

South Carolina Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham could be just the advocate Trump needs in the coming months after he said he would “totally” investigate the FBI’s handling of the Russia probe and Hillary Clinton’s email scandal if he becomes head of the Senate Judiciary Committee.

“The oversight function will be very much front and center,” Graham promised in an appearance on CNN.

Presidential advocate
The South Carolina legislator, who has emerged as one of Trump’s most ardent defenders in the Senate since Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation hearings, is set to replace the current chairman of the judiciary committee, Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA), if Grassley decides to lead the Senate Finance Committee instead. Graham has gone on the record several times suggesting that a second special counsel should be appointed to examine allegations of bias among federal investigators.

Questions about Clinton’s use of an unauthorized homebrew server remain more than two years after an investigation into the matter ended, such as the status of 33,000 missing emails that the former secretary of State deleted or destroyed after learning that the FBI was interested in her communications. Despite evidence of abuse and corruption among FBI and Justice Department leadership in that case, a subsequent inspector general report failed to find bias among investigators because of impossibly rigid standards for doing so.

The FBI’s investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 presidential race has been similarly troubled by partisanship. Based on the thinnest of pretenses, the Obama White House sent undercover informants to spy on the Trump campaign, and investigators at the FBI and DOJ used uncorroborated opposition research paid for by the Clinton campaign to convince secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court judges to allow agents to electronically monitor members of the Trump team.
Dirty agent
The common denominator in both cases is a single, crooked FBI agent. Special Agent Peter Strzok initiated the clandestine investigation of the Trump campaign in the summer of 2016, just after his role as head agent-in-charge of the Clinton email scandal was ending.

Thousands of text messages between Strzok and his mistress at the bureau show that he was an outspoken critic of Trump and wanted to “stop” him from getting elected. Strzok’s communications also demonstrate that he concealed some “VERY inflammatory things” from Congress and planned to use an “insurance policy” in the event that Trump won the election.

Graham pressed Inspector General Michael Horowitz for details related to Strzok’s latter statement in a June 2018 letter, writing: “I believe it would be of grave consequence if the Deputy Director of the FBI [Andrew McCabe] met with the lead investigator of the Clinton Email and Russia investigations to talk about ‘an insurance policy’ against Donald Trump’s victory in the 2016 election.”

Protecting their own
Democrats worry that President Trump may seek to fire Robert Mueller, the special counsel prosecutor appointed in May 2017 to take over the Russia interference investigation. But while Graham said he would support legislation to protect Mueller’s appointment, he said he doesn’t believe there’s a need for it.

“This is a manufactured problem,” Graham said on Fox News. “Trump is not going to fire Mueller. He’s going to be allowed to do his job.” Trump has repeatedly stated that although he thinks he has the authority to fire the special counsel, he would respect the process since he claims that he is innocent of any collusion charges.

Still, progressive lawmakers have revamped calls to codify the special counsel’s legitimacy since Trump fired Attorney General Jeff Sessions after the midterm elections. They fear that his temporary replacement, acting Attorney General Matthew Whitaker, could undermine Mueller’s authority.

Before his appointment, Whitaker penned an op-ed arguing that Mueller had exceeded his original mandate to investigate Russia collusion and that the scope of his investigative powers should be limited.

Should the Senate Judiciary Committee revisit the Hillary Clinton email matter?
Yes
No
Next
While Graham doesn’t think that Trump will get rid of the special counsel, he does see some practical application for legislation protecting Mueller’s role.

“I don’t see any movement to get rid of Mueller,” he said on Tuesday. “But it probably would be good to have this legislation in place just for the future.”

Judge says Hillary Clinton must answer additional questions about emails
November 16, 2018 by Jerry McCormick
Judge says Hillary Clinton must answer additional questions about emails
https://www.patriotnewsalerts.com/judge-says-hillary-has/?utm_medium=ci&utm_source=push&utm_campaign=pna
Could there possibly be justice on the horizon for Hillary Clinton?

After a federal judge ordered that Hillary Clinton must now answer additional questions about her email set up when she was Secretary of State, conservatives are chomping at the bit.

Hard Work
Thanks to a massive effort on the part of conservative watchdog Judicial Watch, Americans may finally learn the truth about Hillary’s emails.

The organization has been repeatedly thwarted by our own Justice Department, so they took their case to the courts.

While a judge denied them access to video depositions given by Hillary’s aides, the court did agree to Hillary having to answer additional questions about her email set up.

View image on Twitter
View image on Twitter

Tom Fitton

@TomFitton
 Breaking: Court rules late today Hillary Clinton must answer more email questions -- including key q's about the setting up of her email system. Court denied our request to unseal vid depositions of Clinton aides. Great work by Michael Bekesha! https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-federal-court-hearing-to-compel-testimony-from-hillary-clinton-and-make-video-depositions-public/ …

5,723
12:03 AM - Nov 15, 2018
3,400 people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy
The Questions
While Judicial Watch clearly wanted access to more information, they were able to get the judge to order Hillary to answer two specific questions she had previously refused to answer:

Question #1

Describe the creation of the clintonemail.com system, including who decided to create the system, the date it was decided to create the system, why it was created, who set it up, and when it became operational.

Question #2

During your October 22, 2015 appearance before the U.S. House of Representatives Select Committee on Benghazi, you testified that 90 to 95 percent of your emails “were in the State’s system” and “if they wanted to see them, they would certainly have been able to do so.” Identify the basis for this statement, including all facts on which you relied in support of the statement, how and when you became aware of these facts, and, if you were made aware of these facts by or through another person, identify the person who made you aware of these facts.

A question Hillary will not have to answer, however, is why she continuously ignored warnings to stop using her Blackberry.

The former Secretary of State had been warned numerous times by her own State Department security team.

Additionally, Judicial Watch inquired about the dual status of Huma Abedin.

Do You Think We Will Ever Bring Hillary Clinton to Justice?
Yes
No
Next
For some reason, while employed as Hillary’s Chief of Staff, she was also able to secure outside employment, presenting security risks.

This may not be the complete transparency Americans expected from the Obama administration and Hillary Clinton, but it is a start.

Monica Lewinsky delves into painful details in ‘The Clinton Affair’
November 15, 2018
https://www.conservativeinstitute.org/sex-scandals/lewinsky-details-affair-clinton.htm?utm_source=aimtell&utm_campaign=automated_push&utm_medium=push
Former White House intern Monica Lewinsky recounts the difficult details of her affair with former President Bill Clinton in an upcoming A&E documentary series titled “The Clinton Affair,” describing the “slow emotional unraveling” and “guilt” she experienced during her relationship with the president.

New details
Despite feeling “uncomfortable” discussing the details, Lewinsky provided an in-depth account of the events that led to Clinton’s impeachment on December 19, 1998, for lying under oath about the recently-ended affair. 

Arriving at the White House as a fresh-faced 21-year-old intern in July 1995, Lewinsky was in awe of the president. “I was struck in a way that he had this ability to hold everybody that was there,” she remembered. “Everybody is sort of starry-eyed in his presence. I kind of have to laugh at my younger self. But that was when my crush started.”

Lewinsky confessed that she developed a crush for Clinton, and it wasn’t long before they had the first of many “flirtatious encounters” when Clinton took her into a back room at the White House and asked if he could kiss her. Many other “intimate encounters” followed as the pair met “almost weekly” in Clinton’s “private personal office.”

Although they met regularly, Lewinsky said that Clinton controlled how often they would meet and speak. “If he called me, I couldn’t call him back,” she said. “I was completely at his mercy in that way. But it’s really sad to me when I look back on it. I was this 22-year-old girl working in the White House… I should have been out on the weekends, meeting people my own age and enjoying myself. And instead, I very often stayed in my office on Saturdays and Sundays, hoping he would call.”

Emotionally broken
When she was suddenly transferred to the Pentagon, Lewinsky worried that she “would never see Bill again,” even though he assured her that he would have her transferred back to the White House if he won re-election. The infamous former intern recalled feeling “so deflated and so desperate” during this time.

“I just broke emotionally,” Lewinsky said as she waited for Clinton to follow through with his promise.

In May 1997, Lewinsky said she started receiving mixed messages from Clinton, who wanted to end the affair “because he was struggling to step outside his marriage and leading a secret life.” When she wrote to the president explaining that she planned to tell her parents about the affair, Clinton responded by being “angry” with her when the two saw each other on July 4.

Clinton’s reaction startled Lewinsky. She said the president “started yelling at me” that “‘it is illegal to threaten the president of the United States of America.’” Lewinsky remembered the encounter:

He was so angry. And I started to cry. I never threatened to go public. I threatened to tell my parents. He immediately softened and he was affectionate … It was a roller coaster of a relationship [that] led to a slow emotional unraveling on my part.

Not long after, in January 1998, she was confronted by FBI agents and Office of the Independent Counsel prosecutors who played a tape of her conversations with the president. “I felt so much guilt,” Lewinsky remembered of the difficult time. She continued:

And I was terrified. There was a point for me … where I would be hysterically crying and then I would just shut down. And in the shutdown period, I remember looking out the window and thinking that the only way to fix this was to kill myself … I was scared.

“I was mortified and afraid of what this was going to do to my family,” Lewinsky continued. “And I still was in love with Bill at the time. So I felt really responsible.”

Does Monica Lewinsky deserve an apology from Bill and Hillary Clinton?
Yes
No
Next
Lesson learned
In a recent Vanity Fair article, Lewinsky recalled how difficult it was to hear Clinton refer to her as “that woman” in statements denying the affair. She hopes that the six-part documentary series will discourage young women from becoming trapped in a similar relationship.

Clinton used the unequal power dynamics of his relationship with Lewinsky to take advantage of her. Thanks to her testimony 20 years later, Americans are finally receiving a full accounting of Clinton’s despicable behavior during his sordid affair with an impressionable intern.

The A&E docuseries premieres on Sunday, November 18.